Home › Castle court records / Old sources › The hearth-tax registers 1775–1794 › Zdany
Hearth Tax Registers of the Łuków Land 1775–1794
Zdany
Parish of Zbuczyn, łukowski county.
Dear reader, remember that this is an AI study, that it may contain errors; treat it as indicative and verify it for yourself.
Offices: Suffczyńska Marianna (wife of the standard-bearer of Łuków (chorążyna łukowska)
spellings on the cards: Zdany, Zdary, Zdanach (loc.)
district of łukowski · parish of Zbuczyn · cards 1), 2), 3), 4), 5), 6), 7)
noble holdings [O83 (IX)]
| Year | Source | Entries | Hearths |
|---|---|---|---|
| T75 | Hearth tax register 1775 | 14 | 26 |
| T89 | Hearth tax register 1789 | 9 | 20 |
| T90 | Hearth tax register 1790 | 11 | 26 |
| T94 | Hearth tax register 1794 | 10 | 24 |
Caveats on the years' registers (7)
What the compiler noted beside the entry itself, and what the table above does not show:
- T75 — T75 occupies two cards: 569 (card 1, entries 1-10) and 570 (card 2, entries 11-14, with the addition „T75 - c.d.”). The total from the card: „Razem dymów 26” (26 underlined twice). The entries give 22 + 4 = 26 — IT AGREES. The siglum is written „T.75.”, and immediately after it stands a word thoroughly struck out with a thick horizontal stroke, illegible even under sevenfold magnification (by its outline it looks like a struck-out name of the village). No entry breaks the buildings down into hearths, and so the field the breakdown of buildings is everywhere empty; the words „propinacja” and „karczma” are not in this extract, the word „Browar” stands once, in entry 1.
- T89 — The extract begins on card 3 (entries 1–2) and ends on card 4 (entries 3–9, „c.d. T89 –”) with the summing „Razem 20 dymów.”. On card 3, higher up, stands a separate, one-line note: „T89 zob. Pruszyn” — a cross-reference to the village of Pruszyn, where the holding of Zdany belonging to that estate is recorded (cf. T90, entry K, „częś. do dóbr Pruszyn – dziedz.” and the closing of T94 „i zob. Pruszyn”). The whole of the buildings of T89 in this village are manor houses alone — not a single inn, brewery or mill.
- T₀89 — The list of possessors of 1789 runs through three cards: 4 (one entry, Maryanna Suffczyńska, with the cross-reference „Zob. Błogoszcz.”), 6 (a heading line + two columns of 11 lines each = 23 entries) and 7 („T₀89 – c.d.”, 2 entries). Together 26 entries; the list gives no hearths, and so the hearths figure and the total from the card are empty by design. THE ORDER: card 6 is written in two columns. A reading by columns has been adopted — first the whole left-hand column (entries 3–13), then the whole right-hand one (entries 14–24). The card does not number the entries, and so an order by lines (alternately left–right) is formally possible; the choice of columns follows from the fact that the brace takes in a continuous block of lines EXCLUSIVELY in the right-hand column. THE BRACE: on card 6, below the line „cz. Adama Izdebskiego”, a horizontal stroke has been drawn, and from it a vertical stroke runs downwards separating the right-hand column — together a frame taking in the last six lines of the right-hand column (entries 19–24). Along the right-hand edge of the card, vertically, stands the inscription „nie wysiewają 10 korcy”. On card 7 the same words are repeated horizontally beside the brace joining the two entries there (25–26). The reach of the brace: 8 entries — 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24 (card 6) and 25 and 26 (card 7). Entries 1–18 are NOT taken in by the brace. In the whole list there is not a single mention of propination, of a brewery, of an inn or of a pledge. REPETITIONS: four forenames of the Zdanowskis occur in the list twice — Tomasz (entries 13 and 19), Szymon (17 and 20), Mateusz (11 and 24) and Wawrzeniec (9 and 26). The card distinguishes them in no way; these may be two different men of the same forename or one possessor of two holdings. I do not resolve it. A COMPARISON: T₀89 names 13 Zdanowskis, T94 and T90 12 each, T89 ten. In T₀89 there is no Kasper (he is in T90 and T94), but there are two Wawrzeńcy — a forename which in T94 appears only as a patronymic („Szymona po Wawrzyńcu”). There appear as well two possessors absent from every register of this village: Grzegorz Chromiński and Stanisław Jezowski.
- T90 — T90 occupies two cards: 570 (card 2, entries A-J) and 571 (card 3, entry K with the addition „c. d. T90.”). The card gives the total TWICE: on card 2, below entry J, stands „Razem 24 dymów wiejskich 2giej klasy;” (24 underlined twice) — this is a partial total, closing 3+1+2+1+1+1+1+1+1+12 = 24; on card 3, after entry K) = 2 hearths has been added, stands the final total „Razem 26 dymów wiejskich 2giej kl.” (26 underlined twice). In the field the total from the card I have recorded 26, because that is the total of the whole extract; the entries give 24 + 2 = 26 — IT AGREES. The entries are lettered A)-K), not numbered. This extract HAS NONE of the marks „/pł. of./”, „/n. pł. of./” or „/p. of./” — on the right-hand side there stands instead of them a column with the class of the hearth, at all the entries and in both summing lines the same: THE SECOND („dymy wiejskie 2giej klasy”). T90 does not break the buildings down into hearths. The words „propinacja”, „browar” and „karczma” are not in this extract.
- T94 — The whole extract fits on card 5 and ends with the summing „Razem 24 dymy; i zob. Pruszyn;” — the last words are a cross-reference to the village of Pruszyn, where the holding of Zdany belonging to that estate is recorded; by that holding the total of 24 is incomplete. No entry names an inn, a brewery or propination.
- S87 — The 1787 census in a single line, at the very top of card 1: „S87 - Zdary - 70 l. + 8 ż: razem 78 l.”; the figure „78 l.” underlined. The name of the village stands here in the form „Zdary” — through an „r”, and not „Zdany” as in the heading of the card and in all four cartographic lines; the reading checked from a sevenfold magnification, the letter „r” beyond doubt. I do not smooth the discrepancy away — „Zdary” goes to the recorded variants. The card names no dissenters. The parish of Zbuczyn is not covered by the printed edition of Fr. B. Kumor (ABMK 39/1979 covers the parish of Trzebieszów), and so of a second, independent check of the figure of the population THERE IS NONE. The figures are recorded in the village's the 1787 census field.
- V48 — The cartographic lines of the village of Zdany in full: card 1 — „P. Zdany.”, „Top. Zdany.”, „Held. Zdany.” (and a fainter addition „por. Pruszyn.” [reading uncertain] to the right of the „Top.” line); card 3 — „V48 - Zdany.”. All four give the same, present-day form of the name.
The card-index entries
Every extract for this locality in the wording of the cards, year by year. One block is one occurrence: this person, in this year. At a collective item the same card text stands beside every person named — because the card names them together and they must not be separated. The hearths given at a collective item are an equal division among those named, not a reading.
1775 T75Hearth tax register 1775
The surname on card 1 is written MORE BRIEFLY than elsewhere and cannot be resolved into letters with certainty: after „Siestrz” two humps and a tall loop without a crossbar can be seen, then „owskiego” — I read „Siestrzuhowskiego” [reading uncertain]. On card 2 (T90 entry B), where the same hand writes more slowly, stands the full „Siestrzewitowskiego” with a distinct „t” with a long crossbar; the same on card 4 (T89). The forename in both places is Krzysztof, and the entry the same (1 hearth), so in the surname I give „Siestrzewitowski”; the form of card 1 remains literally in the text of the extract.
The card gives no forename — the surname alone in the genitive, so the given name and the recorded form of the name are empty (this is not a husband-derived form). The surname „Kozłowczyka” [reading uncertain]: after „Ko” the loop of a „z”, then an „ł” with a distinct crossbar, then „owczyka”. Neither the form „Kozłowczyk” nor any close to it is in `SLOWNIK-OKOLICY.md` — this is a surname new in this neighbourhood.
The surname [reading uncertain]. The ligature „Chr” is the same as in „Chromieńskiego” on card 4, further there are visible „a”, „n”, „o”, „w”, „skiego” — without a „z” after the „r”, so I read „Chranowskiego”. The dictionary of the neighbourhood knows, however, „Chrzanowski”, and the village itself has Chromińskis (T90 entry H). I leave the reading of the card and report it.
the same entry also names: Jasiński Paweł2 persons on 2 hearths
The card writes „Jasinskich” (without a stroke over the „n”); in the surname I give the unified „Jasiński”. The same family returns in T90 entry C) — there too „Jasińskich”. On card 6 (T₀89, the assignment of colleague B) stands in turn „cz. Pawła Jasienskiego”, that is the side form „Jasieński”.
the same entry also names: Jasiński Ignacy2 persons on 2 hearths
The card writes „Jasinskich” (without a stroke over the „n”); in the surname I give the unified „Jasiński”. The same family returns in T90 entry C) — there too „Jasińskich”. On card 6 (T₀89, the assignment of colleague B) stands in turn „cz. Pawła Jasienskiego”, that is the side form „Jasieński”.
the same entry also names: Radzikowski Wojciech2 persons on 2 hearths
the same entry also names: Radzikowski Ludwik2 persons on 2 hearths
the same entry also names: Izdebski Franciszek2 persons on 2 hearths
The card writes the surname in the SINGULAR — „Izdebskiego” — although the persons are two and although in entries 4 and 5 the same hand uses the correct plural („Jasinskich”, „Radzikowskich”). The reading checked at sixfold magnification: the ending „-kiego”, not „-kich”. I do not smooth the discrepancy away; to both persons I give the surname in the nominative „Izdebski”.
the same entry also names: Izdebski Adam2 persons on 2 hearths
The card writes the surname in the SINGULAR — „Izdebskiego” — although the persons are two and although in entries 4 and 5 the same hand uses the correct plural („Jasinskich”, „Radzikowskich”). The reading checked at sixfold magnification: the ending „-kiego”, not „-kich”. I do not smooth the discrepancy away; to both persons I give the surname in the nominative „Izdebski”.
The card writes the surname „Jzowskiego” — after the capital „J” there follows at once the tall loop of a „z”, without a vowel; checked at eightfold magnification and compared with „Józefa” in entry 3 (there between the „J” and the loop stands a distinct „ó”) and with „Jasinskich” in entry 4. The letters are therefore certain, but „Jzowski” is not a possible form of a surname. In the surname I give „Jezowski”, because the same village has Jezowskis in T90 entry I) („Tomasza Jezewskiego”), in T89 („Tomasza Jezowskiego”) and in T94; the form of the card remains literally in the text of the extract. [reading uncertain — the resolution of the surname, not of the letters]. Left to the decision of the owner.
the same entry also names: Zdanowski Stanisław, Zdanowski Wawrzyniec, Zdanowski Bar[tłomiej], Zdanowski Tomasz, Zdanowski Mateusz, Zdanowski Mateusz, Zdanowski Jakób, Zdanowski Łukasz9 persons on 9 hearths
Nine persons, nine hearths — the reckoning closes. „2 Mateuszów” are two namesakes, entered as two persons. The abbreviation „Bar.” I expand as „Bar[tłomiej]”, because Bartłomiej Zdanowski stands with his full forename in T90 entry J) of the same village; „Bar. Tomasza” are therefore two persons (Bartłomiej and Tomasz), not one — otherwise the entry would give eight forenames against nine hearths. The entry runs over two lines; at the beginning of the second line, before „Jakóba”, stands a small sign, probably a struck-out or corrected number, illegible.
the same entry also names: Zdanowski Stanisław, Zdanowski Wawrzyniec, Zdanowski Antoni, Zdanowski Tomasz, Zdanowski Mateusz, Zdanowski Mateusz, Zdanowski Jakób, Zdanowski Łukasz9 persons on 9 hearths
Nine persons, nine hearths — the reckoning closes. „2 Mateuszów” are two namesakes, entered as two persons. The abbreviation „Bar.” I expand as „Bar[tłomiej]”, because Bartłomiej Zdanowski stands with his full forename in T90 entry J) of the same village; „Bar. Tomasza” are therefore two persons (Bartłomiej and Tomasz), not one — otherwise the entry would give eight forenames against nine hearths. The entry runs over two lines; at the beginning of the second line, before „Jakóba”, stands a small sign, probably a struck-out or corrected number, illegible.
the same entry also names: Zdanowski Stanisław, Zdanowski Wawrzyniec, Zdanowski Antoni, Zdanowski Bar[tłomiej], Zdanowski Tomasz, Zdanowski Mateusz, Zdanowski Mateusz, Zdanowski Łukasz9 persons on 9 hearths
Nine persons, nine hearths — the reckoning closes. „2 Mateuszów” are two namesakes, entered as two persons. The abbreviation „Bar.” I expand as „Bar[tłomiej]”, because Bartłomiej Zdanowski stands with his full forename in T90 entry J) of the same village; „Bar. Tomasza” are therefore two persons (Bartłomiej and Tomasz), not one — otherwise the entry would give eight forenames against nine hearths. The entry runs over two lines; at the beginning of the second line, before „Jakóba”, stands a small sign, probably a struck-out or corrected number, illegible.
the same entry also names: Zdanowski Stanisław, Zdanowski Wawrzyniec, Zdanowski Antoni, Zdanowski Bar[tłomiej], Zdanowski Tomasz, Zdanowski Mateusz, Zdanowski Mateusz, Zdanowski Jakób9 persons on 9 hearths
Nine persons, nine hearths — the reckoning closes. „2 Mateuszów” are two namesakes, entered as two persons. The abbreviation „Bar.” I expand as „Bar[tłomiej]”, because Bartłomiej Zdanowski stands with his full forename in T90 entry J) of the same village; „Bar. Tomasza” are therefore two persons (Bartłomiej and Tomasz), not one — otherwise the entry would give eight forenames against nine hearths. The entry runs over two lines; at the beginning of the second line, before „Jakóba”, stands a small sign, probably a struck-out or corrected number, illegible.
the same entry also names: Zdanowski Stanisław, Zdanowski Wawrzyniec, Zdanowski Antoni, Zdanowski Bar[tłomiej], Zdanowski Tomasz, Zdanowski Mateusz, Zdanowski Jakób, Zdanowski Łukasz9 persons on 9 hearths
Nine persons, nine hearths — the reckoning closes. „2 Mateuszów” are two namesakes, entered as two persons. The abbreviation „Bar.” I expand as „Bar[tłomiej]”, because Bartłomiej Zdanowski stands with his full forename in T90 entry J) of the same village; „Bar. Tomasza” are therefore two persons (Bartłomiej and Tomasz), not one — otherwise the entry would give eight forenames against nine hearths. The entry runs over two lines; at the beginning of the second line, before „Jakóba”, stands a small sign, probably a struck-out or corrected number, illegible.
the same entry also names: Zdanowski Stanisław, Zdanowski Wawrzyniec, Zdanowski Antoni, Zdanowski Bar[tłomiej], Zdanowski Tomasz, Zdanowski Mateusz, Zdanowski Jakób, Zdanowski Łukasz9 persons on 9 hearths
Nine persons, nine hearths — the reckoning closes. „2 Mateuszów” are two namesakes, entered as two persons. The abbreviation „Bar.” I expand as „Bar[tłomiej]”, because Bartłomiej Zdanowski stands with his full forename in T90 entry J) of the same village; „Bar. Tomasza” are therefore two persons (Bartłomiej and Tomasz), not one — otherwise the entry would give eight forenames against nine hearths. The entry runs over two lines; at the beginning of the second line, before „Jakóba”, stands a small sign, probably a struck-out or corrected number, illegible.
the same entry also names: Zdanowski Wawrzyniec, Zdanowski Antoni, Zdanowski Bar[tłomiej], Zdanowski Tomasz, Zdanowski Mateusz, Zdanowski Mateusz, Zdanowski Jakób, Zdanowski Łukasz9 persons on 9 hearths
Nine persons, nine hearths — the reckoning closes. „2 Mateuszów” are two namesakes, entered as two persons. The abbreviation „Bar.” I expand as „Bar[tłomiej]”, because Bartłomiej Zdanowski stands with his full forename in T90 entry J) of the same village; „Bar. Tomasza” are therefore two persons (Bartłomiej and Tomasz), not one — otherwise the entry would give eight forenames against nine hearths. The entry runs over two lines; at the beginning of the second line, before „Jakóba”, stands a small sign, probably a struck-out or corrected number, illegible.
the same entry also names: Zdanowski Stanisław, Zdanowski Wawrzyniec, Zdanowski Antoni, Zdanowski Bar[tłomiej], Zdanowski Mateusz, Zdanowski Mateusz, Zdanowski Jakób, Zdanowski Łukasz9 persons on 9 hearths
Nine persons, nine hearths — the reckoning closes. „2 Mateuszów” are two namesakes, entered as two persons. The abbreviation „Bar.” I expand as „Bar[tłomiej]”, because Bartłomiej Zdanowski stands with his full forename in T90 entry J) of the same village; „Bar. Tomasza” are therefore two persons (Bartłomiej and Tomasz), not one — otherwise the entry would give eight forenames against nine hearths. The entry runs over two lines; at the beginning of the second line, before „Jakóba”, stands a small sign, probably a struck-out or corrected number, illegible.
the same entry also names: Zdanowski Stanisław, Zdanowski Antoni, Zdanowski Bar[tłomiej], Zdanowski Tomasz, Zdanowski Mateusz, Zdanowski Mateusz, Zdanowski Jakób, Zdanowski Łukasz9 persons on 9 hearths
Nine persons, nine hearths — the reckoning closes. „2 Mateuszów” are two namesakes, entered as two persons. The abbreviation „Bar.” I expand as „Bar[tłomiej]”, because Bartłomiej Zdanowski stands with his full forename in T90 entry J) of the same village; „Bar. Tomasza” are therefore two persons (Bartłomiej and Tomasz), not one — otherwise the entry would give eight forenames against nine hearths. The entry runs over two lines; at the beginning of the second line, before „Jakóba”, stands a small sign, probably a struck-out or corrected number, illegible.
the same entry also names: Zdanowski Mateusz2 persons on 2 hearths
A separate entry, although the Zdanowskis have already occurred in entry 8 (there among others „2 Mateuszów”). The card reckons these holdings separately; I merge persons neither between the entries nor between the years.
the same entry also names: Zdanowski Joachim2 persons on 2 hearths
A separate entry, although the Zdanowskis have already occurred in entry 8 (there among others „2 Mateuszów”). The card reckons these holdings separately; I merge persons neither between the entries nor between the years.
The first entry on card 2, preceded by the addition „T75 - c.d.”. The card writes „Wysokinskiego” without a stroke over the „n”.
The card writes „Lipinskiego”; in T90 entry A) the same person already has 3 hearths.
The last entry of T75. Jastrzębski appears at Zdany here only — in T90 this surname is no longer present.
1789 T89Hearth tax register 1789
the same entry also names: Zdanowski Tomasz, Zdanowski Bartłomiej, Zdanowski Szymon, Zdanowski Mateusz, Zdanowski Mateusz †, Zdanowski Joachim, Zdanowski Łukasz, Zdanowski Maciej, Zdanowski Mateusz10 persons on 10 hearths
ten persons, ten manor houses, 10 hearths — it agrees. A NOTE ON THE SYNTAX: „sukcesorów” stands twice in this enumeration (before „Antoniego” and before „Mateusza”); it has been assumed that each time it governs only the nearest forename, as throughout the card index („sukc. Józefa, sukc. Wojciecha…”). If it governed the whole group that follows, the number of persons would still come to 10, so the card's total does not settle it — the resolution is conventional, not drawn from the source. T90 and T94 have in this place 12 Zdanowskis, T89 only 10.
the same entry also names: Zdanowski Tomasz, Zdanowski Antoni †, Zdanowski Szymon, Zdanowski Mateusz, Zdanowski Mateusz †, Zdanowski Joachim, Zdanowski Łukasz, Zdanowski Maciej, Zdanowski Mateusz10 persons on 10 hearths
ten persons, ten manor houses, 10 hearths — it agrees. A NOTE ON THE SYNTAX: „sukcesorów” stands twice in this enumeration (before „Antoniego” and before „Mateusza”); it has been assumed that each time it governs only the nearest forename, as throughout the card index („sukc. Józefa, sukc. Wojciecha…”). If it governed the whole group that follows, the number of persons would still come to 10, so the card's total does not settle it — the resolution is conventional, not drawn from the source. T90 and T94 have in this place 12 Zdanowskis, T89 only 10.
the same entry also names: Zdanowski Tomasz, Zdanowski Bartłomiej, Zdanowski Antoni †, Zdanowski Szymon, Zdanowski Mateusz, Zdanowski Mateusz †, Zdanowski Łukasz, Zdanowski Maciej, Zdanowski Mateusz10 persons on 10 hearths
ten persons, ten manor houses, 10 hearths — it agrees. A NOTE ON THE SYNTAX: „sukcesorów” stands twice in this enumeration (before „Antoniego” and before „Mateusza”); it has been assumed that each time it governs only the nearest forename, as throughout the card index („sukc. Józefa, sukc. Wojciecha…”). If it governed the whole group that follows, the number of persons would still come to 10, so the card's total does not settle it — the resolution is conventional, not drawn from the source. T90 and T94 have in this place 12 Zdanowskis, T89 only 10.
the same entry also names: Zdanowski Tomasz, Zdanowski Bartłomiej, Zdanowski Antoni †, Zdanowski Szymon, Zdanowski Mateusz, Zdanowski Mateusz †, Zdanowski Joachim, Zdanowski Maciej, Zdanowski Mateusz10 persons on 10 hearths
ten persons, ten manor houses, 10 hearths — it agrees. A NOTE ON THE SYNTAX: „sukcesorów” stands twice in this enumeration (before „Antoniego” and before „Mateusza”); it has been assumed that each time it governs only the nearest forename, as throughout the card index („sukc. Józefa, sukc. Wojciecha…”). If it governed the whole group that follows, the number of persons would still come to 10, so the card's total does not settle it — the resolution is conventional, not drawn from the source. T90 and T94 have in this place 12 Zdanowskis, T89 only 10.
the same entry also names: Zdanowski Tomasz, Zdanowski Bartłomiej, Zdanowski Antoni †, Zdanowski Szymon, Zdanowski Mateusz, Zdanowski Mateusz †, Zdanowski Joachim, Zdanowski Łukasz, Zdanowski Mateusz10 persons on 10 hearths
ten persons, ten manor houses, 10 hearths — it agrees. A NOTE ON THE SYNTAX: „sukcesorów” stands twice in this enumeration (before „Antoniego” and before „Mateusza”); it has been assumed that each time it governs only the nearest forename, as throughout the card index („sukc. Józefa, sukc. Wojciecha…”). If it governed the whole group that follows, the number of persons would still come to 10, so the card's total does not settle it — the resolution is conventional, not drawn from the source. T90 and T94 have in this place 12 Zdanowskis, T89 only 10.
the same entry also names: Zdanowski Tomasz, Zdanowski Bartłomiej, Zdanowski Antoni †, Zdanowski Szymon, Zdanowski Mateusz †, Zdanowski Joachim, Zdanowski Łukasz, Zdanowski Maciej, Zdanowski Mateusz10 persons on 10 hearths
ten persons, ten manor houses, 10 hearths — it agrees. A NOTE ON THE SYNTAX: „sukcesorów” stands twice in this enumeration (before „Antoniego” and before „Mateusza”); it has been assumed that each time it governs only the nearest forename, as throughout the card index („sukc. Józefa, sukc. Wojciecha…”). If it governed the whole group that follows, the number of persons would still come to 10, so the card's total does not settle it — the resolution is conventional, not drawn from the source. T90 and T94 have in this place 12 Zdanowskis, T89 only 10.
the same entry also names: Zdanowski Tomasz, Zdanowski Bartłomiej, Zdanowski Antoni †, Zdanowski Szymon, Zdanowski Mateusz, Zdanowski Mateusz †, Zdanowski Joachim, Zdanowski Łukasz, Zdanowski Maciej10 persons on 10 hearths
ten persons, ten manor houses, 10 hearths — it agrees. A NOTE ON THE SYNTAX: „sukcesorów” stands twice in this enumeration (before „Antoniego” and before „Mateusza”); it has been assumed that each time it governs only the nearest forename, as throughout the card index („sukc. Józefa, sukc. Wojciecha…”). If it governed the whole group that follows, the number of persons would still come to 10, so the card's total does not settle it — the resolution is conventional, not drawn from the source. T90 and T94 have in this place 12 Zdanowskis, T89 only 10.
the card: „Mateusza po Pawle” — the son of Paweł (likewise T94: „Tomasza po Jakóbie”, „Szymona po Wawrzyńcu”)
the same entry also names: Zdanowski Tomasz, Zdanowski Bartłomiej, Zdanowski Antoni †, Zdanowski Szymon, Zdanowski Mateusz, Zdanowski Joachim, Zdanowski Łukasz, Zdanowski Maciej, Zdanowski Mateusz10 persons on 10 hearths
ten persons, ten manor houses, 10 hearths — it agrees. A NOTE ON THE SYNTAX: „sukcesorów” stands twice in this enumeration (before „Antoniego” and before „Mateusza”); it has been assumed that each time it governs only the nearest forename, as throughout the card index („sukc. Józefa, sukc. Wojciecha…”). If it governed the whole group that follows, the number of persons would still come to 10, so the card's total does not settle it — the resolution is conventional, not drawn from the source. T90 and T94 have in this place 12 Zdanowskis, T89 only 10.
the same entry also names: Zdanowski Tomasz, Zdanowski Bartłomiej, Zdanowski Antoni †, Zdanowski Mateusz, Zdanowski Mateusz †, Zdanowski Joachim, Zdanowski Łukasz, Zdanowski Maciej, Zdanowski Mateusz10 persons on 10 hearths
ten persons, ten manor houses, 10 hearths — it agrees. A NOTE ON THE SYNTAX: „sukcesorów” stands twice in this enumeration (before „Antoniego” and before „Mateusza”); it has been assumed that each time it governs only the nearest forename, as throughout the card index („sukc. Józefa, sukc. Wojciecha…”). If it governed the whole group that follows, the number of persons would still come to 10, so the card's total does not settle it — the resolution is conventional, not drawn from the source. T90 and T94 have in this place 12 Zdanowskis, T89 only 10.
the same entry also names: Zdanowski Bartłomiej, Zdanowski Antoni †, Zdanowski Szymon, Zdanowski Mateusz, Zdanowski Mateusz †, Zdanowski Joachim, Zdanowski Łukasz, Zdanowski Maciej, Zdanowski Mateusz10 persons on 10 hearths
ten persons, ten manor houses, 10 hearths — it agrees. A NOTE ON THE SYNTAX: „sukcesorów” stands twice in this enumeration (before „Antoniego” and before „Mateusza”); it has been assumed that each time it governs only the nearest forename, as throughout the card index („sukc. Józefa, sukc. Wojciecha…”). If it governed the whole group that follows, the number of persons would still come to 10, so the card's total does not settle it — the resolution is conventional, not drawn from the source. T90 and T94 have in this place 12 Zdanowskis, T89 only 10.
the same entry also names: Jasiński Paweł2 persons on 2 hearths
the card writes „Jasinskich”, without the mark of palatalization; in the database the pattern form is Jasiński
the same entry also names: Jasiński Ignacy2 persons on 2 hearths
the card writes „Jasinskich”, without the mark of palatalization; in the database the pattern form is Jasiński
a woman — the surname in the feminine form, as on the card; the same person in T90 (entry F) and in T94
the card writes here „Chromienskiego” (on card 5 in T94 and on card 6 in T₀89 — „Chrominskiego”); the pattern form is Chromiński, the variant „Chromieński” is already in nazwiska.json
„Jezowskiego” — after „Jez” a distinct „o”; on card 5 (T94) the same man is written „Jezewskiego”. The discrepancy is left as it stands on the cards
here „Marka”; T94 has in this place „Marcina Wysokinskiego” — a discrepancy of the forename between the registers
the same entry also names: Izdebski Franciszek2 persons on 2 hearths
the same entry also names: Izdebski Adam2 persons on 2 hearths
1789 T₀89List of possessors of holdings of 1789
a woman — the surname in the feminine form, as on the card. The abbreviation „chor. łukow.” has been expanded as chorążyna łukowska, the wife of the standard-bearer of Łuków (the feminine form, as attested in the card index in „chorążyna ziemi mielnickiej”) — the expansion itself is a grammatical conjecture, the card gives the abbreviation alone. „Zob. Błogoszcz.” [reading uncertain — a place name from outside the corpus hitherto]; the addition „(wymieniona jest pod par. Pruszyn)” says that this possessor (a woman) is described by the card index under the parish of Pruszyn
the last entry BEFORE the brace — the upper stroke of the frame runs just below this line, so the annotation „nie wysiewają 10 korcy” no longer takes it in
the first entry covered by the brace — covered by the brace with the vertical inscription „nie wysiewają 10 korcy” — on card 6 the brace has the form of a frame taking in the last six entries of the right-hand column, on card 7 of an ordinary curly bracket beside both entries
the heading line of card 6 is at the same time the first entry of the list; the card writes „Jassenskiego” (a form attested in nazwiska.json as a variant of the surname Jasiński)
covered by the brace with the vertical inscription „nie wysiewają 10 korcy” — on card 6 the brace has the form of a frame taking in the last six entries of the right-hand column, on card 7 of an ordinary curly bracket beside both entries
covered by the brace with the vertical inscription „nie wysiewają 10 korcy” — on card 6 the brace has the form of a frame taking in the last six entries of the right-hand column, on card 7 of an ordinary curly bracket beside both entries
Stanisław Jezowski appears in none of the registers of this village — only in the list of possessors of 1789 — covered by the brace with the vertical inscription „nie wysiewają 10 korcy” — on card 6 the brace has the form of a frame taking in the last six entries of the right-hand column, on card 7 of an ordinary curly bracket beside both entries
covered by the brace with the vertical inscription „nie wysiewają 10 korcy” — on card 6 the brace has the form of a frame taking in the last six entries of the right-hand column, on card 7 of an ordinary curly bracket beside both entries
the last line of card 6; the brace runs on, onto card 7 — covered by the brace with the vertical inscription „nie wysiewają 10 korcy” — on card 6 the brace has the form of a frame taking in the last six entries of the right-hand column, on card 7 of an ordinary curly bracket beside both entries
the card writes „Krzysztfa” — without the „o”; on cards 4 and 5 the same forename is written in full as „Krzysztofa”
Grzegorz Chromiński appears in none of the registers of this village (T75, T89, T90, T94) — he appears only in the list of possessors of 1789
the card writes „Jasienskiego”
the card writes „Jasienskiego”
the card: „Wawrzenca” (the genitive of Wawrzeniec)
covered by the brace with the vertical inscription „nie wysiewają 10 korcy” — on card 6 the brace has the form of a frame taking in the last six entries of the right-hand column, on card 7 of an ordinary curly bracket beside both entries
the last entry of the list; beside it stands the resolution of the brace — the inscription „nie wysiewają 10 korcy.” — covered by the brace with the vertical inscription „nie wysiewają 10 korcy” — on card 6 the brace has the form of a frame taking in the last six entries of the right-hand column, on card 7 of an ordinary curly bracket beside both entries
1790 T90Hearth tax register 1790
The only entry beside which the class of the hearth is written out in full; beside all the following ones the card repeats it with marks of repetition („ ” „). In T75 entry 13 the same Antoni Lipiński has 1 hearth — in 1790 already 3.
Here the surname is written in its full, legible form — „Siestrzewitowskiego” — and it is this form that settles the uncertain reading of T75 entry 10.
the same entry also names: Jasiński Paweł2 persons on 2 hearths
The same two as in T75 entry 4, in the same order and with the same number of hearths. The card writes here „Jasińskich” with a stroke over the „n”.
the same entry also names: Jasiński Ignacy2 persons on 2 hearths
The same two as in T75 entry 4, in the same order and with the same number of hearths. The card writes here „Jasińskich” with a stroke over the „n”.
In T75 entry 6 Adam Izdebski stands together with Franciszek (2 hearths); in 1790 the card names Adam alone, with one hearth. I do not merge persons between the years.
A WOMAN — a forename of her own and the feminine form of the surname, both legible beyond doubt; the surname I leave in the feminine form, as on the card. The forename written „Marjanny”, with a „j”. In T75 the Radzikowskis are Wojciech and Ludwik (entry 5).
Card 4 (T89, the assignment of colleague B) has the same person in the form „Michała Chromieńskiego”.
The card writes here „Jezewskiego” with an „e”; on card 4 (T89) the same person is „Tomasza Jezowskiego”. The form of the card remains in the surname.
the same entry also names: Zdanowski Joachim, Zdanowski Kasper, Zdanowski Maciej, Zdanowski Mateusz, Zdanowski Mateusz, Zdanowski Łukasz, Zdanowski Szymon, Zdanowski Szymon, Zdanowski Tomasz, Zdanowski Tomasz, Zdanowski Walenty12 persons on 12 hearths
Twelve persons, twelve hearths — the reckoning closes. The card distinguishes the namesakes by the father: „Szymona” and „Szymona syna Wawrzyńca”, „Tomasza” and „Tomasza syna Jakóba”; these additions I have entered in the the status field, because they are neither a byname nor an office. „2 Mateuszów” are two namesakes without any distinction. The entry runs over two lines. Wawrzyniec and Jakób, named here as fathers, stand in their own right in T75 entry 8; I do not merge persons between the years.
the same entry also names: Zdanowski Bartłomiej, Zdanowski Kasper, Zdanowski Maciej, Zdanowski Mateusz, Zdanowski Mateusz, Zdanowski Łukasz, Zdanowski Szymon, Zdanowski Szymon, Zdanowski Tomasz, Zdanowski Tomasz, Zdanowski Walenty12 persons on 12 hearths
Twelve persons, twelve hearths — the reckoning closes. The card distinguishes the namesakes by the father: „Szymona” and „Szymona syna Wawrzyńca”, „Tomasza” and „Tomasza syna Jakóba”; these additions I have entered in the the status field, because they are neither a byname nor an office. „2 Mateuszów” are two namesakes without any distinction. The entry runs over two lines. Wawrzyniec and Jakób, named here as fathers, stand in their own right in T75 entry 8; I do not merge persons between the years.
the same entry also names: Zdanowski Bartłomiej, Zdanowski Joachim, Zdanowski Maciej, Zdanowski Mateusz, Zdanowski Mateusz, Zdanowski Łukasz, Zdanowski Szymon, Zdanowski Szymon, Zdanowski Tomasz, Zdanowski Tomasz, Zdanowski Walenty12 persons on 12 hearths
Twelve persons, twelve hearths — the reckoning closes. The card distinguishes the namesakes by the father: „Szymona” and „Szymona syna Wawrzyńca”, „Tomasza” and „Tomasza syna Jakóba”; these additions I have entered in the the status field, because they are neither a byname nor an office. „2 Mateuszów” are two namesakes without any distinction. The entry runs over two lines. Wawrzyniec and Jakób, named here as fathers, stand in their own right in T75 entry 8; I do not merge persons between the years.
the same entry also names: Zdanowski Bartłomiej, Zdanowski Joachim, Zdanowski Kasper, Zdanowski Maciej, Zdanowski Mateusz, Zdanowski Mateusz, Zdanowski Szymon, Zdanowski Szymon, Zdanowski Tomasz, Zdanowski Tomasz, Zdanowski Walenty12 persons on 12 hearths
Twelve persons, twelve hearths — the reckoning closes. The card distinguishes the namesakes by the father: „Szymona” and „Szymona syna Wawrzyńca”, „Tomasza” and „Tomasza syna Jakóba”; these additions I have entered in the the status field, because they are neither a byname nor an office. „2 Mateuszów” are two namesakes without any distinction. The entry runs over two lines. Wawrzyniec and Jakób, named here as fathers, stand in their own right in T75 entry 8; I do not merge persons between the years.
the same entry also names: Zdanowski Bartłomiej, Zdanowski Joachim, Zdanowski Kasper, Zdanowski Mateusz, Zdanowski Mateusz, Zdanowski Łukasz, Zdanowski Szymon, Zdanowski Szymon, Zdanowski Tomasz, Zdanowski Tomasz, Zdanowski Walenty12 persons on 12 hearths
Twelve persons, twelve hearths — the reckoning closes. The card distinguishes the namesakes by the father: „Szymona” and „Szymona syna Wawrzyńca”, „Tomasza” and „Tomasza syna Jakóba”; these additions I have entered in the the status field, because they are neither a byname nor an office. „2 Mateuszów” are two namesakes without any distinction. The entry runs over two lines. Wawrzyniec and Jakób, named here as fathers, stand in their own right in T75 entry 8; I do not merge persons between the years.
the same entry also names: Zdanowski Bartłomiej, Zdanowski Joachim, Zdanowski Kasper, Zdanowski Maciej, Zdanowski Mateusz, Zdanowski Łukasz, Zdanowski Szymon, Zdanowski Szymon, Zdanowski Tomasz, Zdanowski Tomasz, Zdanowski Walenty12 persons on 12 hearths
Twelve persons, twelve hearths — the reckoning closes. The card distinguishes the namesakes by the father: „Szymona” and „Szymona syna Wawrzyńca”, „Tomasza” and „Tomasza syna Jakóba”; these additions I have entered in the the status field, because they are neither a byname nor an office. „2 Mateuszów” are two namesakes without any distinction. The entry runs over two lines. Wawrzyniec and Jakób, named here as fathers, stand in their own right in T75 entry 8; I do not merge persons between the years.
the same entry also names: Zdanowski Bartłomiej, Zdanowski Joachim, Zdanowski Kasper, Zdanowski Maciej, Zdanowski Mateusz, Zdanowski Łukasz, Zdanowski Szymon, Zdanowski Szymon, Zdanowski Tomasz, Zdanowski Tomasz, Zdanowski Walenty12 persons on 12 hearths
Twelve persons, twelve hearths — the reckoning closes. The card distinguishes the namesakes by the father: „Szymona” and „Szymona syna Wawrzyńca”, „Tomasza” and „Tomasza syna Jakóba”; these additions I have entered in the the status field, because they are neither a byname nor an office. „2 Mateuszów” are two namesakes without any distinction. The entry runs over two lines. Wawrzyniec and Jakób, named here as fathers, stand in their own right in T75 entry 8; I do not merge persons between the years.
the same entry also names: Zdanowski Bartłomiej, Zdanowski Joachim, Zdanowski Kasper, Zdanowski Maciej, Zdanowski Mateusz, Zdanowski Mateusz, Zdanowski Łukasz, Zdanowski Szymon, Zdanowski Tomasz, Zdanowski Tomasz, Zdanowski Walenty12 persons on 12 hearths
Twelve persons, twelve hearths — the reckoning closes. The card distinguishes the namesakes by the father: „Szymona” and „Szymona syna Wawrzyńca”, „Tomasza” and „Tomasza syna Jakóba”; these additions I have entered in the the status field, because they are neither a byname nor an office. „2 Mateuszów” are two namesakes without any distinction. The entry runs over two lines. Wawrzyniec and Jakób, named here as fathers, stand in their own right in T75 entry 8; I do not merge persons between the years.
the same entry also names: Zdanowski Bartłomiej, Zdanowski Joachim, Zdanowski Kasper, Zdanowski Maciej, Zdanowski Mateusz, Zdanowski Mateusz, Zdanowski Łukasz, Zdanowski Szymon, Zdanowski Tomasz, Zdanowski Tomasz, Zdanowski Walenty12 persons on 12 hearths
Twelve persons, twelve hearths — the reckoning closes. The card distinguishes the namesakes by the father: „Szymona” and „Szymona syna Wawrzyńca”, „Tomasza” and „Tomasza syna Jakóba”; these additions I have entered in the the status field, because they are neither a byname nor an office. „2 Mateuszów” are two namesakes without any distinction. The entry runs over two lines. Wawrzyniec and Jakób, named here as fathers, stand in their own right in T75 entry 8; I do not merge persons between the years.
the same entry also names: Zdanowski Bartłomiej, Zdanowski Joachim, Zdanowski Kasper, Zdanowski Maciej, Zdanowski Mateusz, Zdanowski Mateusz, Zdanowski Łukasz, Zdanowski Szymon, Zdanowski Szymon, Zdanowski Tomasz, Zdanowski Walenty12 persons on 12 hearths
Twelve persons, twelve hearths — the reckoning closes. The card distinguishes the namesakes by the father: „Szymona” and „Szymona syna Wawrzyńca”, „Tomasza” and „Tomasza syna Jakóba”; these additions I have entered in the the status field, because they are neither a byname nor an office. „2 Mateuszów” are two namesakes without any distinction. The entry runs over two lines. Wawrzyniec and Jakób, named here as fathers, stand in their own right in T75 entry 8; I do not merge persons between the years.
the same entry also names: Zdanowski Bartłomiej, Zdanowski Joachim, Zdanowski Kasper, Zdanowski Maciej, Zdanowski Mateusz, Zdanowski Mateusz, Zdanowski Łukasz, Zdanowski Szymon, Zdanowski Szymon, Zdanowski Tomasz, Zdanowski Walenty12 persons on 12 hearths
Twelve persons, twelve hearths — the reckoning closes. The card distinguishes the namesakes by the father: „Szymona” and „Szymona syna Wawrzyńca”, „Tomasza” and „Tomasza syna Jakóba”; these additions I have entered in the the status field, because they are neither a byname nor an office. „2 Mateuszów” are two namesakes without any distinction. The entry runs over two lines. Wawrzyniec and Jakób, named here as fathers, stand in their own right in T75 entry 8; I do not merge persons between the years.
the same entry also names: Zdanowski Bartłomiej, Zdanowski Joachim, Zdanowski Kasper, Zdanowski Maciej, Zdanowski Mateusz, Zdanowski Mateusz, Zdanowski Łukasz, Zdanowski Szymon, Zdanowski Szymon, Zdanowski Tomasz, Zdanowski Tomasz12 persons on 12 hearths
Twelve persons, twelve hearths — the reckoning closes. The card distinguishes the namesakes by the father: „Szymona” and „Szymona syna Wawrzyńca”, „Tomasza” and „Tomasza syna Jakóba”; these additions I have entered in the the status field, because they are neither a byname nor an office. „2 Mateuszów” are two namesakes without any distinction. The entry runs over two lines. Wawrzyniec and Jakób, named here as fathers, stand in their own right in T75 entry 8; I do not merge persons between the years.
1794 T94Hearth tax register 1794
the card gives the forename and the surname in the NOMINATIVE („Antoni Lipinski”), otherwise than all the remaining entries (the genitive) — recorded as it stands
a woman — the surname in the feminine form, as on the card
the same entry also names: Zdanowski Tomasz, Zdanowski Mateusz, Zdanowski Kasper, Zdanowski Joachim, Zdanowski Mateusz, Zdanowski Tomasz, Zdanowski Walenty, Zdanowski Szymon, Zdanowski Łukasz, Zdanowski Maciej, Zdanowski Szymon12 persons on 12 hearths
twelve forenames, twelve hearths — it agrees; T90 (entry J) has just as many Zdanowskis, while T89 records ten of them
the same entry also names: Zdanowski Bartłomiej, Zdanowski Tomasz, Zdanowski Mateusz, Zdanowski Kasper, Zdanowski Mateusz, Zdanowski Tomasz, Zdanowski Walenty, Zdanowski Szymon, Zdanowski Łukasz, Zdanowski Maciej, Zdanowski Szymon12 persons on 12 hearths
twelve forenames, twelve hearths — it agrees; T90 (entry J) has just as many Zdanowskis, while T89 records ten of them
the same entry also names: Zdanowski Bartłomiej, Zdanowski Tomasz, Zdanowski Mateusz, Zdanowski Joachim, Zdanowski Mateusz, Zdanowski Tomasz, Zdanowski Walenty, Zdanowski Szymon, Zdanowski Łukasz, Zdanowski Maciej, Zdanowski Szymon12 persons on 12 hearths
twelve forenames, twelve hearths — it agrees; T90 (entry J) has just as many Zdanowskis, while T89 records ten of them
the same entry also names: Zdanowski Bartłomiej, Zdanowski Tomasz, Zdanowski Mateusz, Zdanowski Kasper, Zdanowski Joachim, Zdanowski Mateusz, Zdanowski Tomasz, Zdanowski Walenty, Zdanowski Szymon, Zdanowski Maciej, Zdanowski Szymon12 persons on 12 hearths
twelve forenames, twelve hearths — it agrees; T90 (entry J) has just as many Zdanowskis, while T89 records ten of them
the same entry also names: Zdanowski Bartłomiej, Zdanowski Tomasz, Zdanowski Mateusz, Zdanowski Kasper, Zdanowski Joachim, Zdanowski Mateusz, Zdanowski Tomasz, Zdanowski Walenty, Zdanowski Szymon, Zdanowski Łukasz, Zdanowski Szymon12 persons on 12 hearths
twelve forenames, twelve hearths — it agrees; T90 (entry J) has just as many Zdanowskis, while T89 records ten of them
the same entry also names: Zdanowski Bartłomiej, Zdanowski Tomasz, Zdanowski Kasper, Zdanowski Joachim, Zdanowski Mateusz, Zdanowski Tomasz, Zdanowski Walenty, Zdanowski Szymon, Zdanowski Łukasz, Zdanowski Maciej, Zdanowski Szymon12 persons on 12 hearths
twelve forenames, twelve hearths — it agrees; T90 (entry J) has just as many Zdanowskis, while T89 records ten of them
the same entry also names: Zdanowski Bartłomiej, Zdanowski Tomasz, Zdanowski Mateusz, Zdanowski Kasper, Zdanowski Joachim, Zdanowski Tomasz, Zdanowski Walenty, Zdanowski Szymon, Zdanowski Łukasz, Zdanowski Maciej, Zdanowski Szymon12 persons on 12 hearths
twelve forenames, twelve hearths — it agrees; T90 (entry J) has just as many Zdanowskis, while T89 records ten of them
the same entry also names: Zdanowski Bartłomiej, Zdanowski Tomasz, Zdanowski Mateusz, Zdanowski Kasper, Zdanowski Joachim, Zdanowski Mateusz, Zdanowski Tomasz, Zdanowski Walenty, Zdanowski Łukasz, Zdanowski Maciej, Zdanowski Szymon12 persons on 12 hearths
twelve forenames, twelve hearths — it agrees; T90 (entry J) has just as many Zdanowskis, while T89 records ten of them
the same entry also names: Zdanowski Bartłomiej, Zdanowski Tomasz, Zdanowski Mateusz, Zdanowski Kasper, Zdanowski Joachim, Zdanowski Mateusz, Zdanowski Tomasz, Zdanowski Walenty, Zdanowski Szymon, Zdanowski Łukasz, Zdanowski Maciej12 persons on 12 hearths
twelve forenames, twelve hearths — it agrees; T90 (entry J) has just as many Zdanowskis, while T89 records ten of them
the card: „Szymona po Wawrzyńcu” — the son of Wawrzyniec (T90: „Szymona syna Wawrzyńca”)
the same entry also names: Zdanowski Bartłomiej, Zdanowski Mateusz, Zdanowski Kasper, Zdanowski Joachim, Zdanowski Mateusz, Zdanowski Tomasz, Zdanowski Walenty, Zdanowski Szymon, Zdanowski Łukasz, Zdanowski Maciej, Zdanowski Szymon12 persons on 12 hearths
twelve forenames, twelve hearths — it agrees; T90 (entry J) has just as many Zdanowskis, while T89 records ten of them
the card: „Tomasza po Jakóbie” — the son of Jakób (T90: „Tomasza syna Jakóba”)
the same entry also names: Zdanowski Bartłomiej, Zdanowski Tomasz, Zdanowski Mateusz, Zdanowski Kasper, Zdanowski Joachim, Zdanowski Mateusz, Zdanowski Walenty, Zdanowski Szymon, Zdanowski Łukasz, Zdanowski Maciej, Zdanowski Szymon12 persons on 12 hearths
twelve forenames, twelve hearths — it agrees; T90 (entry J) has just as many Zdanowskis, while T89 records ten of them
the same entry also names: Zdanowski Bartłomiej, Zdanowski Tomasz, Zdanowski Mateusz, Zdanowski Kasper, Zdanowski Joachim, Zdanowski Mateusz, Zdanowski Tomasz, Zdanowski Szymon, Zdanowski Łukasz, Zdanowski Maciej, Zdanowski Szymon12 persons on 12 hearths
twelve forenames, twelve hearths — it agrees; T90 (entry J) has just as many Zdanowskis, while T89 records ten of them
the same entry also names: Jasiński Paweł2 persons on 2 hearths
the card writes „Jasinskich”
the same entry also names: Jasiński Ignacy2 persons on 2 hearths
the card writes „Jasinskich”
A DISCREPANCY: here „Marcina”, whereas T75 (entry 11), T90 (entry D), T89 (card 4) and T₀89 (card 6) have in this place „Marka Wysokinskiego”. The reading „Marcina” checked under magnification; I do not smooth it away
the card: „Chrominskiego” (in T89 on card 4 — „Chromienskiego”)
„Jezewskiego” [reading uncertain]: over the letter after „Jez” stands a dot, so just as well „Jeziewskiego”, and if the dot is read as the mark over a z — „Jeżewskiego”. The same man in T89 (card 4) and in T₀89 (card 6) is written „Jezowski”. Both forms, Jezowski and Jezewski, are already attested in the card index
This locality in the full edition of the hearth-tax registers — together with a search across all persons, a modern map, Perthées’s engraving of 1786 and a statistical summary.
