the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Michał, Jastrzębski Benedykt, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Krzysztof, Jastrzębski Jakób, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Maciej, Jastrzębski Wojciech, Jastrzębski Fabjan, Jastrzębski Maciej, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Jan14 persons on 14 hearths
Home › Castle court records / Old sources › The hearth-tax registers 1775–1794 › Surnames › Jastrzębski
Hearth Tax Registers of the Łuków Land 1775–1794
Jastrzębski
separate records 97 · places 32 · registers 1775, 1789, 1790, 1794
Dear reader, remember that this is an AI study, that it may contain errors; treat it as indicative and verify it for yourself.
„Separate entries for persons” means: separate entries of a given name with a surname and a byname, not persons proved to have existed. The same man recorded in four registers is one entry, but two namesakes from the same village are sometimes impossible to tell apart, and over twenty years a parcel could pass to a son of the same name. The hearths given at a collective entry are an equal division among those named — a calculation, not a reading.
| Year | Source | Entries | Persons | Hearths |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1775 | Hearth tax register 1775 | 49 | 49 | 115,0 |
| 1789 | Hearth tax register 1789 | 45 | 43 | 104,0 |
| 1789 | List of possessors of holdings of 1789 | 48 | 44 | — |
| 1790 | Hearth tax register 1790 | 47 | 46 | 96,0 |
| 1794 | Hearth tax register 1794 | 49 | 47 | 96,0 |
The year 1789 stands twice in the table, and rightly so: these are two different sources. The register gives the hearths, the list of parcel-holders does not — which is why the list carries a dash and not a zero, and the hearths of 1789 are not counted twice.
Where the surname occurs
The localities in which the card file records this surname, with the number of entries and of the hearths falling to it in each village.
- Borki-KosiorkiZbuczynrecords 81 · hearths 64,0
- Borki-KosyZbuczynrecords 5 · hearths 4,0
- Borki-PaduchyZbuczynrecords 9 · hearths 7,0
- Borki-SołdyZbuczynrecords 6 · hearths 5,0
- CelinyTrzebieszówrecords 8 · hearths 6,0
- ChojaZbuczynrecords 3 · hearths 10,0
- ChromnaZbuczynrecords 4 · hearths 7,0
- CielemęcZbuczynrecords 7 · hearths 54,0
- CzerślŁukówrecords 8 · hearths 3,0
- CzuryłyZbuczynrecords 1 · hearths 8,0
- GołaszynŁukówrecords 5 · hearths 4,0
- GrodziskZbuczynrecords 6 · hearths 77,0
- JasionkaZbuczynrecords 9 · hearths 7,0
- Wólka KamiennaZbuczynrecords 5 · hearths 40,0
- ŁęcznowolaTrzebieszówrecords 5 · hearths 32,0
- SmolankaTrzebieszówrecords 1 · hearths 3,0
- Wólka KonopnaTrzebieszówrecords 6 · hearths 4,0
- ZaolszynieTrzebieszówrecords 1
- KurówTrzebieszówrecords 6 · hearths 10,0
- Ługi WielkieZbuczynrecords 1 · hearths 1,0
- ŁukówŁukówrecords 2
- Stare OkninyZbuczynrecords 12 · hearths 12,0
- OlędyZbuczynrecords 1 · hearths 5,0
- Radomyśl SędkiZbuczynrecords 1 · hearths 3,0
- Radzików-StopkiZbuczynrecords 1 · hearths 9,0
- RoleŁukówrecords 18 · hearths 13,0
- RzązewZbuczynrecords 2 · hearths 2,0
- TarczeZbuczynrecords 5 · hearths 7,0
- Tchórzew-PlewkiZbuczynrecords 15 · hearths 7,0
- ZabłocieZbuczynrecords 1 · hearths 3,0
- ZarzeczeŁukówrecords 4 · hearths 3,0
- ZdanyZbuczynrecords 1 · hearths 1,0
bynames used with this surname Dworczyk
offices and dignities commissioner of the Łuków Land (komisarz ziemi łukowskiej) land chamberlain of the Łuków Land (komornik ziemi łukowskiej) registrar of the castle court of Łuków, regent grodzki łukowski judge of the Łuków Land (sędzia ziemi łukowskiej) land judge and civil-military commissioner of Łuków (sędzia ziemski i komisarz cywilno-wojskowy łukowski) land judge of Łuków (sędzia ziemski łukowski) deputy castle court officer of Łuków (vicesgerent grodzki łukowski) deputy castle court officer of Łuków (wicesgerent grodzki łukowski) deputy castle court officer of Łuków (wicesgerent łukowski)
establishments recorded with this surname brewery Cielemęc Grodzisk Łęcznowola Wólka Kamienna inn Cielemęc Grodzisk Łęcznowola Wólka Kamienna propination (the right to sell drink) Cielemęc Grodzisk Łęcznowola
The card-index entries
All the extracts for this surname in the wording of the cards. One block is one occurrence: this person, in this register. In a collective entry the same text of the card stands beside every person named — because the card names them together, and they must not be separated.
Borki-KosiorkiZbuczyn parish
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Michał, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Krzysztof, Jastrzębski Jakób, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Maciej, Jastrzębski Wojciech, Jastrzębski Fabjan, Jastrzębski Maciej, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Adam, Jastrzębski Jan14 persons on 14 hearths
Fourteen forenames, fourteen hearths — it agrees with „po 1 dymie”. Repeated forenames: Ignacy twice, Maciej twice, Marcin twice — this is no slip of reading; each stands in a different place in the list and each carries a hearth of its own (14 persons = 14 hearths). The surname „Jastrzębskich” is added at the end of the third line, by the right-hand edge, in smaller writing and with a turn downwards (there was not room enough). In the line with the total the author wrote the word „dymów” twice — before the figure and after it („dymów 14 dymów”); the figure 14 underlined. I transcribe it literally.
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Michał, Jastrzębski Benedykt, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Krzysztof, Jastrzębski Jakób, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Maciej, Jastrzębski Wojciech, Jastrzębski Maciej, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Adam, Jastrzębski Jan14 persons on 14 hearths
Fourteen forenames, fourteen hearths — it agrees with „po 1 dymie”. Repeated forenames: Ignacy twice, Maciej twice, Marcin twice — this is no slip of reading; each stands in a different place in the list and each carries a hearth of its own (14 persons = 14 hearths). The surname „Jastrzębskich” is added at the end of the third line, by the right-hand edge, in smaller writing and with a turn downwards (there was not room enough). In the line with the total the author wrote the word „dymów” twice — before the figure and after it („dymów 14 dymów”); the figure 14 underlined. I transcribe it literally.
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Michał, Jastrzębski Benedykt, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Krzysztof, Jastrzębski Jakób, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Maciej, Jastrzębski Wojciech, Jastrzębski Fabjan, Jastrzębski Maciej, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Adam, Jastrzębski Jan14 persons on 14 hearths
Fourteen forenames, fourteen hearths — it agrees with „po 1 dymie”. Repeated forenames: Ignacy twice, Maciej twice, Marcin twice — this is no slip of reading; each stands in a different place in the list and each carries a hearth of its own (14 persons = 14 hearths). The surname „Jastrzębskich” is added at the end of the third line, by the right-hand edge, in smaller writing and with a turn downwards (there was not room enough). In the line with the total the author wrote the word „dymów” twice — before the figure and after it („dymów 14 dymów”); the figure 14 underlined. I transcribe it literally.
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Michał, Jastrzębski Benedykt, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Krzysztof, Jastrzębski Jakób, Jastrzębski Maciej, Jastrzębski Wojciech, Jastrzębski Fabjan, Jastrzębski Maciej, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Adam, Jastrzębski Jan14 persons on 14 hearths
Fourteen forenames, fourteen hearths — it agrees with „po 1 dymie”. Repeated forenames: Ignacy twice, Maciej twice, Marcin twice — this is no slip of reading; each stands in a different place in the list and each carries a hearth of its own (14 persons = 14 hearths). The surname „Jastrzębskich” is added at the end of the third line, by the right-hand edge, in smaller writing and with a turn downwards (there was not room enough). In the line with the total the author wrote the word „dymów” twice — before the figure and after it („dymów 14 dymów”); the figure 14 underlined. I transcribe it literally.
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Michał, Jastrzębski Benedykt, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Krzysztof, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Maciej, Jastrzębski Wojciech, Jastrzębski Fabjan, Jastrzębski Maciej, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Adam, Jastrzębski Jan14 persons on 14 hearths
Fourteen forenames, fourteen hearths — it agrees with „po 1 dymie”. Repeated forenames: Ignacy twice, Maciej twice, Marcin twice — this is no slip of reading; each stands in a different place in the list and each carries a hearth of its own (14 persons = 14 hearths). The surname „Jastrzębskich” is added at the end of the third line, by the right-hand edge, in smaller writing and with a turn downwards (there was not room enough). In the line with the total the author wrote the word „dymów” twice — before the figure and after it („dymów 14 dymów”); the figure 14 underlined. I transcribe it literally.
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Michał, Jastrzębski Benedykt, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Krzysztof, Jastrzębski Jakób, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Maciej, Jastrzębski Wojciech, Jastrzębski Fabjan, Jastrzębski Maciej, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Adam14 persons on 14 hearths
Fourteen forenames, fourteen hearths — it agrees with „po 1 dymie”. Repeated forenames: Ignacy twice, Maciej twice, Marcin twice — this is no slip of reading; each stands in a different place in the list and each carries a hearth of its own (14 persons = 14 hearths). The surname „Jastrzębskich” is added at the end of the third line, by the right-hand edge, in smaller writing and with a turn downwards (there was not room enough). In the line with the total the author wrote the word „dymów” twice — before the figure and after it („dymów 14 dymów”); the figure 14 underlined. I transcribe it literally.
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Michał, Jastrzębski Benedykt, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Jakób, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Maciej, Jastrzębski Wojciech, Jastrzębski Fabjan, Jastrzębski Maciej, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Adam, Jastrzębski Jan14 persons on 14 hearths
Fourteen forenames, fourteen hearths — it agrees with „po 1 dymie”. Repeated forenames: Ignacy twice, Maciej twice, Marcin twice — this is no slip of reading; each stands in a different place in the list and each carries a hearth of its own (14 persons = 14 hearths). The surname „Jastrzębskich” is added at the end of the third line, by the right-hand edge, in smaller writing and with a turn downwards (there was not room enough). In the line with the total the author wrote the word „dymów” twice — before the figure and after it („dymów 14 dymów”); the figure 14 underlined. I transcribe it literally.
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Michał, Jastrzębski Benedykt, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Krzysztof, Jastrzębski Jakób, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Wojciech, Jastrzębski Fabjan, Jastrzębski Maciej, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Adam, Jastrzębski Jan14 persons on 14 hearths
Fourteen forenames, fourteen hearths — it agrees with „po 1 dymie”. Repeated forenames: Ignacy twice, Maciej twice, Marcin twice — this is no slip of reading; each stands in a different place in the list and each carries a hearth of its own (14 persons = 14 hearths). The surname „Jastrzębskich” is added at the end of the third line, by the right-hand edge, in smaller writing and with a turn downwards (there was not room enough). In the line with the total the author wrote the word „dymów” twice — before the figure and after it („dymów 14 dymów”); the figure 14 underlined. I transcribe it literally.
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Michał, Jastrzębski Benedykt, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Krzysztof, Jastrzębski Jakób, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Maciej, Jastrzębski Wojciech, Jastrzębski Fabjan, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Adam, Jastrzębski Jan14 persons on 14 hearths
Fourteen forenames, fourteen hearths — it agrees with „po 1 dymie”. Repeated forenames: Ignacy twice, Maciej twice, Marcin twice — this is no slip of reading; each stands in a different place in the list and each carries a hearth of its own (14 persons = 14 hearths). The surname „Jastrzębskich” is added at the end of the third line, by the right-hand edge, in smaller writing and with a turn downwards (there was not room enough). In the line with the total the author wrote the word „dymów” twice — before the figure and after it („dymów 14 dymów”); the figure 14 underlined. I transcribe it literally.
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Michał, Jastrzębski Benedykt, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Krzysztof, Jastrzębski Jakób, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Maciej, Jastrzębski Wojciech, Jastrzębski Fabjan, Jastrzębski Maciej, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Adam, Jastrzębski Jan14 persons on 14 hearths
Fourteen forenames, fourteen hearths — it agrees with „po 1 dymie”. Repeated forenames: Ignacy twice, Maciej twice, Marcin twice — this is no slip of reading; each stands in a different place in the list and each carries a hearth of its own (14 persons = 14 hearths). The surname „Jastrzębskich” is added at the end of the third line, by the right-hand edge, in smaller writing and with a turn downwards (there was not room enough). In the line with the total the author wrote the word „dymów” twice — before the figure and after it („dymów 14 dymów”); the figure 14 underlined. I transcribe it literally.
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Michał, Jastrzębski Benedykt, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Krzysztof, Jastrzębski Jakób, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Maciej, Jastrzębski Wojciech, Jastrzębski Fabjan, Jastrzębski Maciej, Jastrzębski Adam, Jastrzębski Jan14 persons on 14 hearths
Fourteen forenames, fourteen hearths — it agrees with „po 1 dymie”. Repeated forenames: Ignacy twice, Maciej twice, Marcin twice — this is no slip of reading; each stands in a different place in the list and each carries a hearth of its own (14 persons = 14 hearths). The surname „Jastrzębskich” is added at the end of the third line, by the right-hand edge, in smaller writing and with a turn downwards (there was not room enough). In the line with the total the author wrote the word „dymów” twice — before the figure and after it („dymów 14 dymów”); the figure 14 underlined. I transcribe it literally.
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Benedykt, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Krzysztof, Jastrzębski Jakób, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Maciej, Jastrzębski Wojciech, Jastrzębski Fabjan, Jastrzębski Maciej, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Adam, Jastrzębski Jan14 persons on 14 hearths
Fourteen forenames, fourteen hearths — it agrees with „po 1 dymie”. Repeated forenames: Ignacy twice, Maciej twice, Marcin twice — this is no slip of reading; each stands in a different place in the list and each carries a hearth of its own (14 persons = 14 hearths). The surname „Jastrzębskich” is added at the end of the third line, by the right-hand edge, in smaller writing and with a turn downwards (there was not room enough). In the line with the total the author wrote the word „dymów” twice — before the figure and after it („dymów 14 dymów”); the figure 14 underlined. I transcribe it literally.
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Michał, Jastrzębski Benedykt, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Krzysztof, Jastrzębski Jakób, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Maciej, Jastrzębski Fabjan, Jastrzębski Maciej, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Adam, Jastrzębski Jan14 persons on 14 hearths
Fourteen forenames, fourteen hearths — it agrees with „po 1 dymie”. Repeated forenames: Ignacy twice, Maciej twice, Marcin twice — this is no slip of reading; each stands in a different place in the list and each carries a hearth of its own (14 persons = 14 hearths). The surname „Jastrzębskich” is added at the end of the third line, by the right-hand edge, in smaller writing and with a turn downwards (there was not room enough). In the line with the total the author wrote the word „dymów” twice — before the figure and after it („dymów 14 dymów”); the figure 14 underlined. I transcribe it literally.
The addition „— zob. Dziewule;” in black ink, the rest of the line in blue. The two hearths ENTER into the card's own total: 2+16+3+1+1+1 = 24 = „Razem 24 dymy”. This entry is answered by the reference mark „F) zob. Dziewule.—” in T90 on the same card, there already without a number of hearths.
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Tomasz, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Michał, Jastrzębski Paweł, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Szymon, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Maciej «Dworczyk», Jastrzębski Fabian, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Mateusz, Jastrzębski Józef, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Marcin †, Jastrzębski Teresa16 persons on 16 hearths
Sixteen persons, sixteen hearths. The first forename of the line — „Jana” — is STRUCK OUT with a clear zigzag (unlike in T90 of the same card, where the same word is merely crossed through once and still counts toward the total) and does not enter into the sixteen; without it there come out exactly 16 forenames, and the card's own total closes. The figure „6” in „16” is corrected in black ink — the card's total (24) confirms the reading of 16. THE UNIT „d. dwor.”: I do not expand the abbreviation and therefore do NOT fill in the breakdown of buildings. The card index sometimes has the record „(każdy po 1 dworze) = 7 d.”, which divides the hearths among manor houses — here the card writes „po 1 d.” (per hearth) and only then furnishes the total with the abbreviation „d. dwor.”, so I am not certain whether this means „dymów dworskich” (a hearth class, as with „dymy wiejskie 2giej klasy” in T90) or „dworów” (a type of building). I will not guess — a matter for the owner to decide, described in the report.
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Tomasz, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Michał, Jastrzębski Paweł, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Szymon, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Maciej «Dworczyk», Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Mateusz, Jastrzębski Józef, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Marcin †, Jastrzębski Teresa, Jastrzębski Adam16 persons on 16 hearths
Sixteen persons, sixteen hearths. The first forename of the line — „Jana” — is STRUCK OUT with a clear zigzag (unlike in T90 of the same card, where the same word is merely crossed through once and still counts toward the total) and does not enter into the sixteen; without it there come out exactly 16 forenames, and the card's own total closes. The figure „6” in „16” is corrected in black ink — the card's total (24) confirms the reading of 16. THE UNIT „d. dwor.”: I do not expand the abbreviation and therefore do NOT fill in the breakdown of buildings. The card index sometimes has the record „(każdy po 1 dworze) = 7 d.”, which divides the hearths among manor houses — here the card writes „po 1 d.” (per hearth) and only then furnishes the total with the abbreviation „d. dwor.”, so I am not certain whether this means „dymów dworskich” (a hearth class, as with „dymy wiejskie 2giej klasy” in T90) or „dworów” (a type of building). I will not guess — a matter for the owner to decide, described in the report.
the wording on the card is closer to „Fobiana”; I read „Fabiana”, because the same person stands in T90 on the same card as „Fabiana” [reading uncertain as to the vowel]
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Tomasz, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Michał, Jastrzębski Paweł, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Szymon, Jastrzębski Maciej «Dworczyk», Jastrzębski Fabian, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Mateusz, Jastrzębski Józef, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Marcin †, Jastrzębski Teresa, Jastrzębski Adam16 persons on 16 hearths
Sixteen persons, sixteen hearths. The first forename of the line — „Jana” — is STRUCK OUT with a clear zigzag (unlike in T90 of the same card, where the same word is merely crossed through once and still counts toward the total) and does not enter into the sixteen; without it there come out exactly 16 forenames, and the card's own total closes. The figure „6” in „16” is corrected in black ink — the card's total (24) confirms the reading of 16. THE UNIT „d. dwor.”: I do not expand the abbreviation and therefore do NOT fill in the breakdown of buildings. The card index sometimes has the record „(każdy po 1 dworze) = 7 d.”, which divides the hearths among manor houses — here the card writes „po 1 d.” (per hearth) and only then furnishes the total with the abbreviation „d. dwor.”, so I am not certain whether this means „dymów dworskich” (a hearth class, as with „dymy wiejskie 2giej klasy” in T90) or „dworów” (a type of building). I will not guess — a matter for the owner to decide, described in the report.
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Tomasz, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Michał, Jastrzębski Paweł, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Szymon, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Maciej «Dworczyk», Jastrzębski Fabian, Jastrzębski Mateusz, Jastrzębski Józef, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Marcin †, Jastrzębski Teresa, Jastrzębski Adam16 persons on 16 hearths
Sixteen persons, sixteen hearths. The first forename of the line — „Jana” — is STRUCK OUT with a clear zigzag (unlike in T90 of the same card, where the same word is merely crossed through once and still counts toward the total) and does not enter into the sixteen; without it there come out exactly 16 forenames, and the card's own total closes. The figure „6” in „16” is corrected in black ink — the card's total (24) confirms the reading of 16. THE UNIT „d. dwor.”: I do not expand the abbreviation and therefore do NOT fill in the breakdown of buildings. The card index sometimes has the record „(każdy po 1 dworze) = 7 d.”, which divides the hearths among manor houses — here the card writes „po 1 d.” (per hearth) and only then furnishes the total with the abbreviation „d. dwor.”, so I am not certain whether this means „dymów dworskich” (a hearth class, as with „dymy wiejskie 2giej klasy” in T90) or „dworów” (a type of building). I will not guess — a matter for the owner to decide, described in the report.
the card adds „po Mateuszu”
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Tomasz, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Michał, Jastrzębski Paweł, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Szymon, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Maciej «Dworczyk», Jastrzębski Fabian, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Mateusz, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Marcin †, Jastrzębski Teresa, Jastrzębski Adam16 persons on 16 hearths
Sixteen persons, sixteen hearths. The first forename of the line — „Jana” — is STRUCK OUT with a clear zigzag (unlike in T90 of the same card, where the same word is merely crossed through once and still counts toward the total) and does not enter into the sixteen; without it there come out exactly 16 forenames, and the card's own total closes. The figure „6” in „16” is corrected in black ink — the card's total (24) confirms the reading of 16. THE UNIT „d. dwor.”: I do not expand the abbreviation and therefore do NOT fill in the breakdown of buildings. The card index sometimes has the record „(każdy po 1 dworze) = 7 d.”, which divides the hearths among manor houses — here the card writes „po 1 d.” (per hearth) and only then furnishes the total with the abbreviation „d. dwor.”, so I am not certain whether this means „dymów dworskich” (a hearth class, as with „dymy wiejskie 2giej klasy” in T90) or „dworów” (a type of building). I will not guess — a matter for the owner to decide, described in the report.
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Tomasz, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Michał, Jastrzębski Paweł, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Szymon, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Fabian, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Mateusz, Jastrzębski Józef, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Marcin †, Jastrzębski Teresa, Jastrzębski Adam16 persons on 16 hearths
Sixteen persons, sixteen hearths. The first forename of the line — „Jana” — is STRUCK OUT with a clear zigzag (unlike in T90 of the same card, where the same word is merely crossed through once and still counts toward the total) and does not enter into the sixteen; without it there come out exactly 16 forenames, and the card's own total closes. The figure „6” in „16” is corrected in black ink — the card's total (24) confirms the reading of 16. THE UNIT „d. dwor.”: I do not expand the abbreviation and therefore do NOT fill in the breakdown of buildings. The card index sometimes has the record „(każdy po 1 dworze) = 7 d.”, which divides the hearths among manor houses — here the card writes „po 1 d.” (per hearth) and only then furnishes the total with the abbreviation „d. dwor.”, so I am not certain whether this means „dymów dworskich” (a hearth class, as with „dymy wiejskie 2giej klasy” in T90) or „dworów” (a type of building). I will not guess — a matter for the owner to decide, described in the report.
on the card with a hyphen: „Macieja-Dworczyka”
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Tomasz, Jastrzębski Michał, Jastrzębski Paweł, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Szymon, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Maciej «Dworczyk», Jastrzębski Fabian, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Mateusz, Jastrzębski Józef, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Marcin †, Jastrzębski Teresa, Jastrzębski Adam16 persons on 16 hearths
Sixteen persons, sixteen hearths. The first forename of the line — „Jana” — is STRUCK OUT with a clear zigzag (unlike in T90 of the same card, where the same word is merely crossed through once and still counts toward the total) and does not enter into the sixteen; without it there come out exactly 16 forenames, and the card's own total closes. The figure „6” in „16” is corrected in black ink — the card's total (24) confirms the reading of 16. THE UNIT „d. dwor.”: I do not expand the abbreviation and therefore do NOT fill in the breakdown of buildings. The card index sometimes has the record „(każdy po 1 dworze) = 7 d.”, which divides the hearths among manor houses — here the card writes „po 1 d.” (per hearth) and only then furnishes the total with the abbreviation „d. dwor.”, so I am not certain whether this means „dymów dworskich” (a hearth class, as with „dymy wiejskie 2giej klasy” in T90) or „dworów” (a type of building). I will not guess — a matter for the owner to decide, described in the report.
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Tomasz, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Michał, Jastrzębski Paweł, Jastrzębski Szymon, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Maciej «Dworczyk», Jastrzębski Fabian, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Mateusz, Jastrzębski Józef, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Marcin †, Jastrzębski Teresa, Jastrzębski Adam16 persons on 16 hearths
Sixteen persons, sixteen hearths. The first forename of the line — „Jana” — is STRUCK OUT with a clear zigzag (unlike in T90 of the same card, where the same word is merely crossed through once and still counts toward the total) and does not enter into the sixteen; without it there come out exactly 16 forenames, and the card's own total closes. The figure „6” in „16” is corrected in black ink — the card's total (24) confirms the reading of 16. THE UNIT „d. dwor.”: I do not expand the abbreviation and therefore do NOT fill in the breakdown of buildings. The card index sometimes has the record „(każdy po 1 dworze) = 7 d.”, which divides the hearths among manor houses — here the card writes „po 1 d.” (per hearth) and only then furnishes the total with the abbreviation „d. dwor.”, so I am not certain whether this means „dymów dworskich” (a hearth class, as with „dymy wiejskie 2giej klasy” in T90) or „dworów” (a type of building). I will not guess — a matter for the owner to decide, described in the report.
the card adds „po Joachymie” — presumably the same one whom T90 calls „Marcina syna Joachima”; I make no merger
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Tomasz, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Michał, Jastrzębski Paweł, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Szymon, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Maciej «Dworczyk», Jastrzębski Fabian, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Mateusz, Jastrzębski Józef, Jastrzębski Marcin †, Jastrzębski Teresa, Jastrzębski Adam16 persons on 16 hearths
Sixteen persons, sixteen hearths. The first forename of the line — „Jana” — is STRUCK OUT with a clear zigzag (unlike in T90 of the same card, where the same word is merely crossed through once and still counts toward the total) and does not enter into the sixteen; without it there come out exactly 16 forenames, and the card's own total closes. The figure „6” in „16” is corrected in black ink — the card's total (24) confirms the reading of 16. THE UNIT „d. dwor.”: I do not expand the abbreviation and therefore do NOT fill in the breakdown of buildings. The card index sometimes has the record „(każdy po 1 dworze) = 7 d.”, which divides the hearths among manor houses — here the card writes „po 1 d.” (per hearth) and only then furnishes the total with the abbreviation „d. dwor.”, so I am not certain whether this means „dymów dworskich” (a hearth class, as with „dymy wiejskie 2giej klasy” in T90) or „dworów” (a type of building). I will not guess — a matter for the owner to decide, described in the report.
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Tomasz, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Michał, Jastrzębski Paweł, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Szymon, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Maciej «Dworczyk», Jastrzębski Fabian, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Mateusz, Jastrzębski Józef, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Teresa, Jastrzębski Adam16 persons on 16 hearths
Sixteen persons, sixteen hearths. The first forename of the line — „Jana” — is STRUCK OUT with a clear zigzag (unlike in T90 of the same card, where the same word is merely crossed through once and still counts toward the total) and does not enter into the sixteen; without it there come out exactly 16 forenames, and the card's own total closes. The figure „6” in „16” is corrected in black ink — the card's total (24) confirms the reading of 16. THE UNIT „d. dwor.”: I do not expand the abbreviation and therefore do NOT fill in the breakdown of buildings. The card index sometimes has the record „(każdy po 1 dworze) = 7 d.”, which divides the hearths among manor houses — here the card writes „po 1 d.” (per hearth) and only then furnishes the total with the abbreviation „d. dwor.”, so I am not certain whether this means „dymów dworskich” (a hearth class, as with „dymy wiejskie 2giej klasy” in T90) or „dworów” (a type of building). I will not guess — a matter for the owner to decide, described in the report.
the card: „sukcesorów Marcina” — a person named, but already deceased
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Tomasz, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Michał, Jastrzębski Paweł, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Szymon, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Maciej «Dworczyk», Jastrzębski Fabian, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Józef, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Marcin †, Jastrzębski Teresa, Jastrzębski Adam16 persons on 16 hearths
Sixteen persons, sixteen hearths. The first forename of the line — „Jana” — is STRUCK OUT with a clear zigzag (unlike in T90 of the same card, where the same word is merely crossed through once and still counts toward the total) and does not enter into the sixteen; without it there come out exactly 16 forenames, and the card's own total closes. The figure „6” in „16” is corrected in black ink — the card's total (24) confirms the reading of 16. THE UNIT „d. dwor.”: I do not expand the abbreviation and therefore do NOT fill in the breakdown of buildings. The card index sometimes has the record „(każdy po 1 dworze) = 7 d.”, which divides the hearths among manor houses — here the card writes „po 1 d.” (per hearth) and only then furnishes the total with the abbreviation „d. dwor.”, so I am not certain whether this means „dymów dworskich” (a hearth class, as with „dymy wiejskie 2giej klasy” in T90) or „dworów” (a type of building). I will not guess — a matter for the owner to decide, described in the report.
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Tomasz, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Paweł, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Szymon, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Maciej «Dworczyk», Jastrzębski Fabian, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Mateusz, Jastrzębski Józef, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Marcin †, Jastrzębski Teresa, Jastrzębski Adam16 persons on 16 hearths
Sixteen persons, sixteen hearths. The first forename of the line — „Jana” — is STRUCK OUT with a clear zigzag (unlike in T90 of the same card, where the same word is merely crossed through once and still counts toward the total) and does not enter into the sixteen; without it there come out exactly 16 forenames, and the card's own total closes. The figure „6” in „16” is corrected in black ink — the card's total (24) confirms the reading of 16. THE UNIT „d. dwor.”: I do not expand the abbreviation and therefore do NOT fill in the breakdown of buildings. The card index sometimes has the record „(każdy po 1 dworze) = 7 d.”, which divides the hearths among manor houses — here the card writes „po 1 d.” (per hearth) and only then furnishes the total with the abbreviation „d. dwor.”, so I am not certain whether this means „dymów dworskich” (a hearth class, as with „dymy wiejskie 2giej klasy” in T90) or „dworów” (a type of building). I will not guess — a matter for the owner to decide, described in the report.
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Tomasz, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Michał, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Szymon, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Maciej «Dworczyk», Jastrzębski Fabian, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Mateusz, Jastrzębski Józef, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Marcin †, Jastrzębski Teresa, Jastrzębski Adam16 persons on 16 hearths
Sixteen persons, sixteen hearths. The first forename of the line — „Jana” — is STRUCK OUT with a clear zigzag (unlike in T90 of the same card, where the same word is merely crossed through once and still counts toward the total) and does not enter into the sixteen; without it there come out exactly 16 forenames, and the card's own total closes. The figure „6” in „16” is corrected in black ink — the card's total (24) confirms the reading of 16. THE UNIT „d. dwor.”: I do not expand the abbreviation and therefore do NOT fill in the breakdown of buildings. The card index sometimes has the record „(każdy po 1 dworze) = 7 d.”, which divides the hearths among manor houses — here the card writes „po 1 d.” (per hearth) and only then furnishes the total with the abbreviation „d. dwor.”, so I am not certain whether this means „dymów dworskich” (a hearth class, as with „dymy wiejskie 2giej klasy” in T90) or „dworów” (a type of building). I will not guess — a matter for the owner to decide, described in the report.
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Tomasz, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Michał, Jastrzębski Paweł, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Maciej «Dworczyk», Jastrzębski Fabian, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Mateusz, Jastrzębski Józef, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Marcin †, Jastrzębski Teresa, Jastrzębski Adam16 persons on 16 hearths
Sixteen persons, sixteen hearths. The first forename of the line — „Jana” — is STRUCK OUT with a clear zigzag (unlike in T90 of the same card, where the same word is merely crossed through once and still counts toward the total) and does not enter into the sixteen; without it there come out exactly 16 forenames, and the card's own total closes. The figure „6” in „16” is corrected in black ink — the card's total (24) confirms the reading of 16. THE UNIT „d. dwor.”: I do not expand the abbreviation and therefore do NOT fill in the breakdown of buildings. The card index sometimes has the record „(każdy po 1 dworze) = 7 d.”, which divides the hearths among manor houses — here the card writes „po 1 d.” (per hearth) and only then furnishes the total with the abbreviation „d. dwor.”, so I am not certain whether this means „dymów dworskich” (a hearth class, as with „dymy wiejskie 2giej klasy” in T90) or „dworów” (a type of building). I will not guess — a matter for the owner to decide, described in the report.
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Tomasz, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Michał, Jastrzębski Paweł, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Szymon, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Maciej «Dworczyk», Jastrzębski Fabian, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Mateusz, Jastrzębski Józef, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Marcin †, Jastrzębski Adam16 persons on 16 hearths
Sixteen persons, sixteen hearths. The first forename of the line — „Jana” — is STRUCK OUT with a clear zigzag (unlike in T90 of the same card, where the same word is merely crossed through once and still counts toward the total) and does not enter into the sixteen; without it there come out exactly 16 forenames, and the card's own total closes. The figure „6” in „16” is corrected in black ink — the card's total (24) confirms the reading of 16. THE UNIT „d. dwor.”: I do not expand the abbreviation and therefore do NOT fill in the breakdown of buildings. The card index sometimes has the record „(każdy po 1 dworze) = 7 d.”, which divides the hearths among manor houses — here the card writes „po 1 d.” (per hearth) and only then furnishes the total with the abbreviation „d. dwor.”, so I am not certain whether this means „dymów dworskich” (a hearth class, as with „dymy wiejskie 2giej klasy” in T90) or „dworów” (a type of building). I will not guess — a matter for the owner to decide, described in the report.
A WOMAN with a forename of her own: the card writes „Teresy wdowy”, that is it gives a forename and not merely a husband-derived form — hence the given name = „Teresa”, and the recorded form of the name is left empty. The widow is alive, so the mark for a deceased person is empty; the card does not say by whom she was widowed, and I do not supply it. The surname comes from the collective member „Jastrzębskich” — it stands there in the masculine plural, so I record „Jastrzębski”, and the sex is recognised from the forename.
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Michał, Jastrzębski Paweł, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Szymon, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Maciej «Dworczyk», Jastrzębski Fabian, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Mateusz, Jastrzębski Józef, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Marcin †, Jastrzębski Teresa, Jastrzębski Adam16 persons on 16 hearths
Sixteen persons, sixteen hearths. The first forename of the line — „Jana” — is STRUCK OUT with a clear zigzag (unlike in T90 of the same card, where the same word is merely crossed through once and still counts toward the total) and does not enter into the sixteen; without it there come out exactly 16 forenames, and the card's own total closes. The figure „6” in „16” is corrected in black ink — the card's total (24) confirms the reading of 16. THE UNIT „d. dwor.”: I do not expand the abbreviation and therefore do NOT fill in the breakdown of buildings. The card index sometimes has the record „(każdy po 1 dworze) = 7 d.”, which divides the hearths among manor houses — here the card writes „po 1 d.” (per hearth) and only then furnishes the total with the abbreviation „d. dwor.”, so I am not certain whether this means „dymów dworskich” (a hearth class, as with „dymy wiejskie 2giej klasy” in T90) or „dworów” (a type of building). I will not guess — a matter for the owner to decide, described in the report.
The first entry of the list still stands in the line with the siglum and the village name, on the right-hand side of the card; the following ones run in two columns. Outside the brace „nie wysiewają 10 korcy”.
A WOMAN with a forename of her own and a surname in the FEMININE form — I record it as it stands on the card („Teresy Jastrzębskiej”), so the surname = „Jastrzębska”, and the recorded form of the name is left empty, because the card gives a forename of her own. Probably the same person whom T89 on card 2) calls „Teresy wdowy” among the Jastrzębskis, but I do not merge them — that is a task for the index stage. Here the card does not say that she is a widow, so I leave the status empty. OUTSIDE the brace.
The FIRST entry below the horizontal stroke, that is the first one taken in by the brace; beside it stands the full „cz.”, beside the following ones a repetition mark. The entry is taken in by a great brace running along the right-hand edge of the card with the vertical inscription „nie wysiewają 10 korcy” — hence the annotation. The brace takes in all eleven entries of the lower block of the right-hand column (entries 16–26), from „cz. Michała Jastrzębskiego” to „Adama Jastrzębskiego”.
The entry is taken in by a large brace running along the right-hand edge of the card, with the vertical inscription „nie wysiewają 10 korcy” — hence the annotation. The brace takes in all eleven entries of the lower block of the right-hand column (entries 16–26), from „cz. Michała Jastrzębskiego” to „Adama Jastrzębskiego”.
The second Michał Jastrzębski in this block; the card does not distinguish between them. The entry is taken in by a large brace running along the right-hand edge of the card, with the vertical inscription „nie wysiewają 10 korcy” — hence the annotation. The brace takes in all eleven entries of the lower block of the right-hand column (entries 16–26), from „cz. Michała Jastrzębskiego” to „Adama Jastrzębskiego”.
The second Marcin Jastrzębski in this block; the card does not distinguish them (in T90 and T94 they presumably correspond to „Marcin syn Pawła” and „Marcin syn Joachima”, but here there is no such addition and I do not supply one). The entry is taken in by the great brace running along the right-hand edge of the card with the vertical inscription „nie wysiewają 10 korcy” — hence the annotation. The brace takes in all eleven entries of the lower block of the right-hand column (entries 16–26), from „cz. Michała Jastrzębskiego” to „Adama Jastrzębskiego”.
The first line of the left-hand column; beside it the full „cz.”, beside the further ones only the repetition mark („).
The entry is taken in by a large brace running along the right-hand edge of the card, with the vertical inscription „nie wysiewają 10 korcy” — hence the annotation. The brace takes in all eleven entries of the lower block of the right-hand column (entries 16–26), from „cz. Michała Jastrzębskiego” to „Adama Jastrzębskiego”.
The forename is written after a correction: several letters in the middle of the word are reworked and flooded with ink, which makes them look thicker than the rest; I read „Szymona” [reading uncertain as to the middle letters] — behind this reading stands the composition of the village, because Szymon Jastrzębski occurs in T90, in T89, and in T94 alike. The entry is taken in by the great brace running along the right-hand edge of the card with the vertical inscription „nie wysiewają 10 korcy” — hence the annotation. The brace takes in all eleven entries of the lower block of the right-hand column (entries 16–26), from „cz. Michała Jastrzębskiego” to „Adama Jastrzębskiego”.
Beside this entry, on the right, stands the SIGN ① — the same as beside „Macieja Jastrzębskiego” in the left-hand column (entry 5); it binds the husband's holding to the wife's. The entry is taken in by a great brace running along the right-hand edge of the card with the vertical inscription „nie wysiewają 10 korcy” — hence the annotation. The brace takes in all eleven entries of the lower block of the right-hand column (entries 16–26), from „cz. Michała Jastrzębskiego” to „Adama Jastrzębskiego”.
A WOMAN. The card gives neither her forename nor her surname — it names her solely through her husband: „żony Macieja Jastrzębskiego” (wife of Maciej Jastrzębski). I record this whole form literally in the recorded form of the name, the given name is left empty. I give the surname in the form it stands on the card, that is the masculine one („Jastrzębski”) — on the card it belongs grammatically to Maciej, not to her, and I do not invent a feminine form for her. I do NOT enter Maciej here as a separate person: the card names him only to show whose wife she is, and his own holding stands in the left-hand column (entry 5), marked with the same sign ①.
The LAST entry on card 4) — the line runs right along the bottom edge, but is legible in full. The brace ends at it; on card 5) there is no longer any brace. The entry is taken in by a large brace running along the right-hand edge of the card, with the vertical inscription „nie wysiewają 10 korcy” — hence the annotation. The brace takes in all eleven entries of the lower block of the right-hand column (entries 16–26), from „cz. Michała Jastrzębskiego” to „Adama Jastrzębskiego”.
The FIRST of two Ignacy Jastrzębski in the left-hand column; the second stands two lines lower (entry 6), after Maciej. The card distinguishes them in no way — unlike T90 and T94, where one of them carries the addition „syna Macieja” / „po Macieju”. I make no decision as to which is which.
Beside this entry, on the right, stands the SIGN ① (a 1 in a circle). The same sign recurs in the right-hand column beside „żony Macieja Jastrzębskiego” (entry 24) and binds the two entries together: the husband's holding and the wife's holding. The card does not explain the sign's meaning — I do not expand it. Outside the brace.
The SECOND Ignacy Jastrzębski of the left-hand column (the first in entry 4, two lines higher). The card does not distinguish them.
the same entry also names: Borkowska Elżbieta2 persons on 2 hearths
The figure „2” is underlined. The hearth class („dymy wiejskie 2giej klasy”) is repeated at entries B–D by repetition marks (quotation marks) and recurs in the card's own total. This is a single entry made up of two parts: Tomasz Jastrzębski's own, and the one held after the deceased Elżbieta Borkowska — the card does not divide how many hearths belong to which, so I do not fill in the breakdown of buildings. The phrase „po Elżbiecie Borkowskiej” (after Elżbieta Borkowska) says that the holding passed after her to Tomasz Jastrzębski, but the card does not call her deceased (there is no „sukces.”, „niegdy” or „ś.p.”), so we do not set the death marker — just as with „cz. Antoniego po Piotrze Lipińskim” in Ługi Wielkie. Something else is worth noting: in T89 and T₀89 (1789) Elżbieta Borkowska still holds the part herself, while in T90 (1790) and T94 (1794) the part is already „po niej” (after her).
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Adam, Jastrzębski Franciszek, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Jan, Jastrzębski Krzysztof, Jastrzębski Maciej «Dworczyk», Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Mateusz, Jastrzębski Michał, Jastrzębski Paweł, Jastrzębski Szymon, Jastrzębski Fabian15 persons on 15 hearths
Fifteen persons, fifteen hearths — it agrees with „po 1 dymie” and with the card's own total (2+15+1+2+1 = 21 = „Razem – 21”). It is precisely this total that settles the dispute over the reworked digits: the figure beside this entry is written in black ink over something earlier and taken on its own could be read as either 15 or 16 — the card's own arithmetic requires 15, and fifteen forenames also give 15, so I read 15. The word „Jana” is gone over in black ink (with a short horizontal stroke above it): if it were taken as struck out, fourteen forenames would remain and the card's total would not close, so I treat this mark as a correction/reinforcement of the writing, not as a deletion. Note: in T89 on the same card „Jana” really is struck out — with a clear zigzag — and there it indeed does not count towards the total. The repetition marks („ „ „ „) in the right-hand margin refer back to „dymy wiejskie 2giej klasy” from entry A.
A WOMAN. The card gives no forename of her own, only the husband-derived form „Jakubowej wdowy” — recorded literally in the recorded form of the name, the given name is left empty. The surname comes from the collective member „– Jastrzębskich –”. I do not expand it: the card does not say which Jakub she was the wife of, and so I set the mark for a deceased person beside that Jakub for no one, because the card does not name this person by a forename of his own.
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Franciszek, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Jan, Jastrzębski, Jastrzębski Krzysztof, Jastrzębski Maciej «Dworczyk», Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Mateusz, Jastrzębski Michał, Jastrzębski Paweł, Jastrzębski Szymon, Jastrzębski Fabian15 persons on 15 hearths
Fifteen persons, fifteen hearths — it agrees with „po 1 dymie” and with the card's own total (2+15+1+2+1 = 21 = „Razem – 21”). It is precisely this total that settles the dispute over the reworked digits: the figure beside this entry is written in black ink over something earlier and taken on its own could be read as either 15 or 16 — the card's own arithmetic requires 15, and fifteen forenames also give 15, so I read 15. The word „Jana” is gone over in black ink (with a short horizontal stroke above it): if it were taken as struck out, fourteen forenames would remain and the card's total would not close, so I treat this mark as a correction/reinforcement of the writing, not as a deletion. Note: in T89 on the same card „Jana” really is struck out — with a clear zigzag — and there it indeed does not count towards the total. The repetition marks („ „ „ „) in the right-hand margin refer back to „dymy wiejskie 2giej klasy” from entry A.
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Adam, Jastrzębski Franciszek, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Jan, Jastrzębski, Jastrzębski Krzysztof, Jastrzębski Maciej «Dworczyk», Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Mateusz, Jastrzębski Michał, Jastrzębski Paweł, Jastrzębski Szymon15 persons on 15 hearths
Fifteen persons, fifteen hearths — it agrees with „po 1 dymie” and with the card's own total (2+15+1+2+1 = 21 = „Razem – 21”). It is precisely this total that settles the dispute over the reworked digits: the figure beside this entry is written in black ink over something earlier and taken on its own could be read as either 15 or 16 — the card's own arithmetic requires 15, and fifteen forenames also give 15, so I read 15. The word „Jana” is gone over in black ink (with a short horizontal stroke above it): if it were taken as struck out, fourteen forenames would remain and the card's total would not close, so I treat this mark as a correction/reinforcement of the writing, not as a deletion. Note: in T89 on the same card „Jana” really is struck out — with a clear zigzag — and there it indeed does not count towards the total. The repetition marks („ „ „ „) in the right-hand margin refer back to „dymy wiejskie 2giej klasy” from entry A.
the forename gone over and outlined later in black ink, so that it is the thickest word of the line; the reading „Fabiana” is certain — the same person returns in T89 on the same card
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Adam, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Jan, Jastrzębski, Jastrzębski Krzysztof, Jastrzębski Maciej «Dworczyk», Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Mateusz, Jastrzębski Michał, Jastrzębski Paweł, Jastrzębski Szymon, Jastrzębski Fabian15 persons on 15 hearths
Fifteen persons, fifteen hearths — it agrees with „po 1 dymie” and with the card's own total (2+15+1+2+1 = 21 = „Razem – 21”). It is precisely this total that settles the dispute over the reworked digits: the figure beside this entry is written in black ink over something earlier and taken on its own could be read as either 15 or 16 — the card's own arithmetic requires 15, and fifteen forenames also give 15, so I read 15. The word „Jana” is gone over in black ink (with a short horizontal stroke above it): if it were taken as struck out, fourteen forenames would remain and the card's total would not close, so I treat this mark as a correction/reinforcement of the writing, not as a deletion. Note: in T89 on the same card „Jana” really is struck out — with a clear zigzag — and there it indeed does not count towards the total. The repetition marks („ „ „ „) in the right-hand margin refer back to „dymy wiejskie 2giej klasy” from entry A.
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Adam, Jastrzębski Franciszek, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Jan, Jastrzębski, Jastrzębski Krzysztof, Jastrzębski Maciej «Dworczyk», Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Mateusz, Jastrzębski Michał, Jastrzębski Paweł, Jastrzębski Szymon, Jastrzębski Fabian15 persons on 15 hearths
Fifteen persons, fifteen hearths — it agrees with „po 1 dymie” and with the card's own total (2+15+1+2+1 = 21 = „Razem – 21”). It is precisely this total that settles the dispute over the reworked digits: the figure beside this entry is written in black ink over something earlier and taken on its own could be read as either 15 or 16 — the card's own arithmetic requires 15, and fifteen forenames also give 15, so I read 15. The word „Jana” is gone over in black ink (with a short horizontal stroke above it): if it were taken as struck out, fourteen forenames would remain and the card's total would not close, so I treat this mark as a correction/reinforcement of the writing, not as a deletion. Note: in T89 on the same card „Jana” really is struck out — with a clear zigzag — and there it indeed does not count towards the total. The repetition marks („ „ „ „) in the right-hand margin refer back to „dymy wiejskie 2giej klasy” from entry A.
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Adam, Jastrzębski Franciszek, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Jan, Jastrzębski, Jastrzębski Krzysztof, Jastrzębski Maciej «Dworczyk», Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Mateusz, Jastrzębski Michał, Jastrzębski Paweł, Jastrzębski Szymon, Jastrzębski Fabian15 persons on 15 hearths
Fifteen persons, fifteen hearths — it agrees with „po 1 dymie” and with the card's own total (2+15+1+2+1 = 21 = „Razem – 21”). It is precisely this total that settles the dispute over the reworked digits: the figure beside this entry is written in black ink over something earlier and taken on its own could be read as either 15 or 16 — the card's own arithmetic requires 15, and fifteen forenames also give 15, so I read 15. The word „Jana” is gone over in black ink (with a short horizontal stroke above it): if it were taken as struck out, fourteen forenames would remain and the card's total would not close, so I treat this mark as a correction/reinforcement of the writing, not as a deletion. Note: in T89 on the same card „Jana” really is struck out — with a clear zigzag — and there it indeed does not count towards the total. The repetition marks („ „ „ „) in the right-hand margin refer back to „dymy wiejskie 2giej klasy” from entry A.
the card adds „syna Macieja” — a distinction from the second Ignacy in the same entry
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Adam, Jastrzębski Franciszek, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski, Jastrzębski Krzysztof, Jastrzębski Maciej «Dworczyk», Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Mateusz, Jastrzębski Michał, Jastrzębski Paweł, Jastrzębski Szymon, Jastrzębski Fabian15 persons on 15 hearths
Fifteen persons, fifteen hearths — it agrees with „po 1 dymie” and with the card's own total (2+15+1+2+1 = 21 = „Razem – 21”). It is precisely this total that settles the dispute over the reworked digits: the figure beside this entry is written in black ink over something earlier and taken on its own could be read as either 15 or 16 — the card's own arithmetic requires 15, and fifteen forenames also give 15, so I read 15. The word „Jana” is gone over in black ink (with a short horizontal stroke above it): if it were taken as struck out, fourteen forenames would remain and the card's total would not close, so I treat this mark as a correction/reinforcement of the writing, not as a deletion. Note: in T89 on the same card „Jana” really is struck out — with a clear zigzag — and there it indeed does not count towards the total. The repetition marks („ „ „ „) in the right-hand margin refer back to „dymy wiejskie 2giej klasy” from entry A.
on the card „Jana” gone over later in black ink; the word remains legible and DOES COUNT towards the 15 hearths (see the entry's the note)
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Adam, Jastrzębski Franciszek, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Jan, Jastrzębski, Jastrzębski Maciej «Dworczyk», Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Mateusz, Jastrzębski Michał, Jastrzębski Paweł, Jastrzębski Szymon, Jastrzębski Fabian15 persons on 15 hearths
Fifteen persons, fifteen hearths — it agrees with „po 1 dymie” and with the card's own total (2+15+1+2+1 = 21 = „Razem – 21”). It is precisely this total that settles the dispute over the reworked digits: the figure beside this entry is written in black ink over something earlier and taken on its own could be read as either 15 or 16 — the card's own arithmetic requires 15, and fifteen forenames also give 15, so I read 15. The word „Jana” is gone over in black ink (with a short horizontal stroke above it): if it were taken as struck out, fourteen forenames would remain and the card's total would not close, so I treat this mark as a correction/reinforcement of the writing, not as a deletion. Note: in T89 on the same card „Jana” really is struck out — with a clear zigzag — and there it indeed does not count towards the total. The repetition marks („ „ „ „) in the right-hand margin refer back to „dymy wiejskie 2giej klasy” from entry A.
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Adam, Jastrzębski Franciszek, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Jan, Jastrzębski, Jastrzębski Krzysztof, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Mateusz, Jastrzębski Michał, Jastrzębski Paweł, Jastrzębski Szymon, Jastrzębski Fabian15 persons on 15 hearths
Fifteen persons, fifteen hearths — it agrees with „po 1 dymie” and with the card's own total (2+15+1+2+1 = 21 = „Razem – 21”). It is precisely this total that settles the dispute over the reworked digits: the figure beside this entry is written in black ink over something earlier and taken on its own could be read as either 15 or 16 — the card's own arithmetic requires 15, and fifteen forenames also give 15, so I read 15. The word „Jana” is gone over in black ink (with a short horizontal stroke above it): if it were taken as struck out, fourteen forenames would remain and the card's total would not close, so I treat this mark as a correction/reinforcement of the writing, not as a deletion. Note: in T89 on the same card „Jana” really is struck out — with a clear zigzag — and there it indeed does not count towards the total. The repetition marks („ „ „ „) in the right-hand margin refer back to „dymy wiejskie 2giej klasy” from entry A.
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Adam, Jastrzębski Franciszek, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Jan, Jastrzębski, Jastrzębski Krzysztof, Jastrzębski Maciej «Dworczyk», Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Mateusz, Jastrzębski Michał, Jastrzębski Paweł, Jastrzębski Szymon, Jastrzębski Fabian15 persons on 15 hearths
Fifteen persons, fifteen hearths — it agrees with „po 1 dymie” and with the card's own total (2+15+1+2+1 = 21 = „Razem – 21”). It is precisely this total that settles the dispute over the reworked digits: the figure beside this entry is written in black ink over something earlier and taken on its own could be read as either 15 or 16 — the card's own arithmetic requires 15, and fifteen forenames also give 15, so I read 15. The word „Jana” is gone over in black ink (with a short horizontal stroke above it): if it were taken as struck out, fourteen forenames would remain and the card's total would not close, so I treat this mark as a correction/reinforcement of the writing, not as a deletion. Note: in T89 on the same card „Jana” really is struck out — with a clear zigzag — and there it indeed does not count towards the total. The repetition marks („ „ „ „) in the right-hand margin refer back to „dymy wiejskie 2giej klasy” from entry A.
the card adds „syna Pawła”
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Adam, Jastrzębski Franciszek, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Jan, Jastrzębski, Jastrzębski Krzysztof, Jastrzębski Maciej «Dworczyk», Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Mateusz, Jastrzębski Michał, Jastrzębski Paweł, Jastrzębski Szymon, Jastrzębski Fabian15 persons on 15 hearths
Fifteen persons, fifteen hearths — it agrees with „po 1 dymie” and with the card's own total (2+15+1+2+1 = 21 = „Razem – 21”). It is precisely this total that settles the dispute over the reworked digits: the figure beside this entry is written in black ink over something earlier and taken on its own could be read as either 15 or 16 — the card's own arithmetic requires 15, and fifteen forenames also give 15, so I read 15. The word „Jana” is gone over in black ink (with a short horizontal stroke above it): if it were taken as struck out, fourteen forenames would remain and the card's total would not close, so I treat this mark as a correction/reinforcement of the writing, not as a deletion. Note: in T89 on the same card „Jana” really is struck out — with a clear zigzag — and there it indeed does not count towards the total. The repetition marks („ „ „ „) in the right-hand margin refer back to „dymy wiejskie 2giej klasy” from entry A.
the card adds „syna Joachima”
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Adam, Jastrzębski Franciszek, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Jan, Jastrzębski, Jastrzębski Krzysztof, Jastrzębski Maciej «Dworczyk», Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Michał, Jastrzębski Paweł, Jastrzębski Szymon, Jastrzębski Fabian15 persons on 15 hearths
Fifteen persons, fifteen hearths — it agrees with „po 1 dymie” and with the card's own total (2+15+1+2+1 = 21 = „Razem – 21”). It is precisely this total that settles the dispute over the reworked digits: the figure beside this entry is written in black ink over something earlier and taken on its own could be read as either 15 or 16 — the card's own arithmetic requires 15, and fifteen forenames also give 15, so I read 15. The word „Jana” is gone over in black ink (with a short horizontal stroke above it): if it were taken as struck out, fourteen forenames would remain and the card's total would not close, so I treat this mark as a correction/reinforcement of the writing, not as a deletion. Note: in T89 on the same card „Jana” really is struck out — with a clear zigzag — and there it indeed does not count towards the total. The repetition marks („ „ „ „) in the right-hand margin refer back to „dymy wiejskie 2giej klasy” from entry A.
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Adam, Jastrzębski Franciszek, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Jan, Jastrzębski, Jastrzębski Krzysztof, Jastrzębski Maciej «Dworczyk», Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Mateusz, Jastrzębski Paweł, Jastrzębski Szymon, Jastrzębski Fabian15 persons on 15 hearths
Fifteen persons, fifteen hearths — it agrees with „po 1 dymie” and with the card's own total (2+15+1+2+1 = 21 = „Razem – 21”). It is precisely this total that settles the dispute over the reworked digits: the figure beside this entry is written in black ink over something earlier and taken on its own could be read as either 15 or 16 — the card's own arithmetic requires 15, and fifteen forenames also give 15, so I read 15. The word „Jana” is gone over in black ink (with a short horizontal stroke above it): if it were taken as struck out, fourteen forenames would remain and the card's total would not close, so I treat this mark as a correction/reinforcement of the writing, not as a deletion. Note: in T89 on the same card „Jana” really is struck out — with a clear zigzag — and there it indeed does not count towards the total. The repetition marks („ „ „ „) in the right-hand margin refer back to „dymy wiejskie 2giej klasy” from entry A.
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Adam, Jastrzębski Franciszek, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Jan, Jastrzębski, Jastrzębski Krzysztof, Jastrzębski Maciej «Dworczyk», Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Mateusz, Jastrzębski Michał, Jastrzębski Szymon, Jastrzębski Fabian15 persons on 15 hearths
Fifteen persons, fifteen hearths — it agrees with „po 1 dymie” and with the card's own total (2+15+1+2+1 = 21 = „Razem – 21”). It is precisely this total that settles the dispute over the reworked digits: the figure beside this entry is written in black ink over something earlier and taken on its own could be read as either 15 or 16 — the card's own arithmetic requires 15, and fifteen forenames also give 15, so I read 15. The word „Jana” is gone over in black ink (with a short horizontal stroke above it): if it were taken as struck out, fourteen forenames would remain and the card's total would not close, so I treat this mark as a correction/reinforcement of the writing, not as a deletion. Note: in T89 on the same card „Jana” really is struck out — with a clear zigzag — and there it indeed does not count towards the total. The repetition marks („ „ „ „) in the right-hand margin refer back to „dymy wiejskie 2giej klasy” from entry A.
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Adam, Jastrzębski Franciszek, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Jan, Jastrzębski, Jastrzębski Krzysztof, Jastrzębski Maciej «Dworczyk», Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Mateusz, Jastrzębski Michał, Jastrzębski Paweł, Jastrzębski Fabian15 persons on 15 hearths
Fifteen persons, fifteen hearths — it agrees with „po 1 dymie” and with the card's own total (2+15+1+2+1 = 21 = „Razem – 21”). It is precisely this total that settles the dispute over the reworked digits: the figure beside this entry is written in black ink over something earlier and taken on its own could be read as either 15 or 16 — the card's own arithmetic requires 15, and fifteen forenames also give 15, so I read 15. The word „Jana” is gone over in black ink (with a short horizontal stroke above it): if it were taken as struck out, fourteen forenames would remain and the card's total would not close, so I treat this mark as a correction/reinforcement of the writing, not as a deletion. Note: in T89 on the same card „Jana” really is struck out — with a clear zigzag — and there it indeed does not count towards the total. The repetition marks („ „ „ „) in the right-hand margin refer back to „dymy wiejskie 2giej klasy” from entry A.
the same entry also names: Borkowska Elżbieta2 persons on 2 hearths
At the start of the line, right after „cz.”, stands a word STRUCK OUT by a double horizontal stroke; beneath the striking-out three letters are visible, which I read as the beginning of a forename — „Tom…” [reading uncertain] — that is, the writer began with the forename, thought better of it, and wrote the surname first, the forename only after it. The figure „2” with an underline. The same pair of holdings as in T90 entry A on card 2), there too 2 hearths. The phrase „po Elżbiecie Borkowskiej” says that the holding passed after her to Tomasz Jastrzębski, but the card does not call her deceased (there is no „sukces.”, „niegdy” nor „ś.p.”), so no death marker is put — just as with „cz. Antoniego po Piotrze Lipińskim” in Ługi Wielkie. Something else is worth noting: in T89 and T₀89 (1789) Elżbieta Borkowska still holds the holding herself, while in T90 (1790) and T94 (1794) the holding is already „po niej”.
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Krzysztof, Jastrzębski Jan, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Mateusz, Jastrzębski Michał, Jastrzębski Szymon, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Franciszek, Jastrzębski Marcin «Dworczyk», Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Fabijan, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Paweł, Jastrzębski Adam15 persons on 15 hearths
Fifteen persons, fifteen hearths — this agrees with „(po 1 dymie)” and with the card's own total (2+15+2+1+1 = 21 = „Razem 21 dymów”). The set of persons is, down to the one person, the same as in T90 entry B on card 2), only in a different order and with three differences in the wording: „Marcina Dworczyka” instead of „Macieja Dworczyka”, „Fabijana” instead of „Fabiana”, „wdowy Jakubowej” instead of „Jakubowej wdowy”. None of the entries here is corrected or struck out — this card is clean, and it is this card that confirms that on card 2) in T90 the number of hearths is 15, and that the „Jana” crossed through in black there does count.
A WOMAN. The card gives no forename of her own, only the husband-derived form — recorded literally in the recorded form of the name, the given name empty. The word order is the reverse of T90 on card 2) („Jakubowej wdowy”), here „wdowy Jakubowej”; I record the order of this card. The surname from the collective member „Jastrzębskich”.
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Krzysztof, Jastrzębski Jan, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Mateusz, Jastrzębski Michał, Jastrzębski Szymon, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Franciszek, Jastrzębski Marcin «Dworczyk», Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Fabijan, Jastrzębski, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Paweł15 persons on 15 hearths
Fifteen persons, fifteen hearths — this agrees with „(po 1 dymie)” and with the card's own total (2+15+2+1+1 = 21 = „Razem 21 dymów”). The set of persons is, down to the one person, the same as in T90 entry B on card 2), only in a different order and with three differences in the wording: „Marcina Dworczyka” instead of „Macieja Dworczyka”, „Fabijana” instead of „Fabiana”, „wdowy Jakubowej” instead of „Jakubowej wdowy”. None of the entries here is corrected or struck out — this card is clean, and it is this card that confirms that on card 2) in T90 the number of hearths is 15, and that the „Jana” crossed through in black there does count.
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Krzysztof, Jastrzębski Jan, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Mateusz, Jastrzębski Michał, Jastrzębski Szymon, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Franciszek, Jastrzębski Marcin «Dworczyk», Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Paweł, Jastrzębski Adam15 persons on 15 hearths
Fifteen persons, fifteen hearths — this agrees with „(po 1 dymie)” and with the card's own total (2+15+2+1+1 = 21 = „Razem 21 dymów”). The set of persons is, down to the one person, the same as in T90 entry B on card 2), only in a different order and with three differences in the wording: „Marcina Dworczyka” instead of „Macieja Dworczyka”, „Fabijana” instead of „Fabiana”, „wdowy Jakubowej” instead of „Jakubowej wdowy”. None of the entries here is corrected or struck out — this card is clean, and it is this card that confirms that on card 2) in T90 the number of hearths is 15, and that the „Jana” crossed through in black there does count.
here the record is „Fabijana”, with „-ij-”; in T90 on card 2) „Fabiana”. I record the form from this card.
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Krzysztof, Jastrzębski Jan, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Mateusz, Jastrzębski Michał, Jastrzębski Szymon, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Marcin «Dworczyk», Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Fabijan, Jastrzębski, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Paweł, Jastrzębski Adam15 persons on 15 hearths
Fifteen persons, fifteen hearths — this agrees with „(po 1 dymie)” and with the card's own total (2+15+2+1+1 = 21 = „Razem 21 dymów”). The set of persons is, down to the one person, the same as in T90 entry B on card 2), only in a different order and with three differences in the wording: „Marcina Dworczyka” instead of „Macieja Dworczyka”, „Fabijana” instead of „Fabiana”, „wdowy Jakubowej” instead of „Jakubowej wdowy”. None of the entries here is corrected or struck out — this card is clean, and it is this card that confirms that on card 2) in T90 the number of hearths is 15, and that the „Jana” crossed through in black there does count.
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Krzysztof, Jastrzębski Jan, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Mateusz, Jastrzębski Michał, Jastrzębski Szymon, Jastrzębski Franciszek, Jastrzębski Marcin «Dworczyk», Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Fabijan, Jastrzębski, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Paweł, Jastrzębski Adam15 persons on 15 hearths
Fifteen persons, fifteen hearths — this agrees with „(po 1 dymie)” and with the card's own total (2+15+2+1+1 = 21 = „Razem 21 dymów”). The set of persons is, down to the one person, the same as in T90 entry B on card 2), only in a different order and with three differences in the wording: „Marcina Dworczyka” instead of „Macieja Dworczyka”, „Fabijana” instead of „Fabiana”, „wdowy Jakubowej” instead of „Jakubowej wdowy”. None of the entries here is corrected or struck out — this card is clean, and it is this card that confirms that on card 2) in T90 the number of hearths is 15, and that the „Jana” crossed through in black there does count.
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Krzysztof, Jastrzębski Jan, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Mateusz, Jastrzębski Michał, Jastrzębski Szymon, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Franciszek, Jastrzębski Marcin «Dworczyk», Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Fabijan, Jastrzębski, Jastrzębski Paweł, Jastrzębski Adam15 persons on 15 hearths
Fifteen persons, fifteen hearths — this agrees with „(po 1 dymie)” and with the card's own total (2+15+2+1+1 = 21 = „Razem 21 dymów”). The set of persons is, down to the one person, the same as in T90 entry B on card 2), only in a different order and with three differences in the wording: „Marcina Dworczyka” instead of „Macieja Dworczyka”, „Fabijana” instead of „Fabiana”, „wdowy Jakubowej” instead of „Jakubowej wdowy”. None of the entries here is corrected or struck out — this card is clean, and it is this card that confirms that on card 2) in T90 the number of hearths is 15, and that the „Jana” crossed through in black there does count.
the card adds „po Macieju” (in T90 on card 2): „Ignacego syna Macieja”)
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Krzysztof, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Mateusz, Jastrzębski Michał, Jastrzębski Szymon, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Franciszek, Jastrzębski Marcin «Dworczyk», Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Fabijan, Jastrzębski, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Paweł, Jastrzębski Adam15 persons on 15 hearths
Fifteen persons, fifteen hearths — this agrees with „(po 1 dymie)” and with the card's own total (2+15+2+1+1 = 21 = „Razem 21 dymów”). The set of persons is, down to the one person, the same as in T90 entry B on card 2), only in a different order and with three differences in the wording: „Marcina Dworczyka” instead of „Macieja Dworczyka”, „Fabijana” instead of „Fabiana”, „wdowy Jakubowej” instead of „Jakubowej wdowy”. None of the entries here is corrected or struck out — this card is clean, and it is this card that confirms that on card 2) in T90 the number of hearths is 15, and that the „Jana” crossed through in black there does count.
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Jan, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Mateusz, Jastrzębski Michał, Jastrzębski Szymon, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Franciszek, Jastrzębski Marcin «Dworczyk», Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Fabijan, Jastrzębski, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Paweł, Jastrzębski Adam15 persons on 15 hearths
Fifteen persons, fifteen hearths — this agrees with „(po 1 dymie)” and with the card's own total (2+15+2+1+1 = 21 = „Razem 21 dymów”). The set of persons is, down to the one person, the same as in T90 entry B on card 2), only in a different order and with three differences in the wording: „Marcina Dworczyka” instead of „Macieja Dworczyka”, „Fabijana” instead of „Fabiana”, „wdowy Jakubowej” instead of „Jakubowej wdowy”. None of the entries here is corrected or struck out — this card is clean, and it is this card that confirms that on card 2) in T90 the number of hearths is 15, and that the „Jana” crossed through in black there does count.
on the card an abbreviation with its expansion in the author's own hand: „Kr.(zysztofa)” — the expansion comes from the card, not from me
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Krzysztof, Jastrzębski Jan, Jastrzębski Mateusz, Jastrzębski Michał, Jastrzębski Szymon, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Franciszek, Jastrzębski Marcin «Dworczyk», Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Fabijan, Jastrzębski, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Paweł, Jastrzębski Adam15 persons on 15 hearths
Fifteen persons, fifteen hearths — this agrees with „(po 1 dymie)” and with the card's own total (2+15+2+1+1 = 21 = „Razem 21 dymów”). The set of persons is, down to the one person, the same as in T90 entry B on card 2), only in a different order and with three differences in the wording: „Marcina Dworczyka” instead of „Macieja Dworczyka”, „Fabijana” instead of „Fabiana”, „wdowy Jakubowej” instead of „Jakubowej wdowy”. None of the entries here is corrected or struck out — this card is clean, and it is this card that confirms that on card 2) in T90 the number of hearths is 15, and that the „Jana” crossed through in black there does count.
the card adds „po Pawle”
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Krzysztof, Jastrzębski Jan, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Mateusz, Jastrzębski Michał, Jastrzębski Szymon, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Franciszek, Jastrzębski Marcin «Dworczyk», Jastrzębski Fabijan, Jastrzębski, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Paweł, Jastrzębski Adam15 persons on 15 hearths
Fifteen persons, fifteen hearths — this agrees with „(po 1 dymie)” and with the card's own total (2+15+2+1+1 = 21 = „Razem 21 dymów”). The set of persons is, down to the one person, the same as in T90 entry B on card 2), only in a different order and with three differences in the wording: „Marcina Dworczyka” instead of „Macieja Dworczyka”, „Fabijana” instead of „Fabiana”, „wdowy Jakubowej” instead of „Jakubowej wdowy”. None of the entries here is corrected or struck out — this card is clean, and it is this card that confirms that on card 2) in T90 the number of hearths is 15, and that the „Jana” crossed through in black there does count.
the card adds „po Joachimie” (in T89 on card 2) the same phrase reads „po Joachymie”)
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Krzysztof, Jastrzębski Jan, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Mateusz, Jastrzębski Michał, Jastrzębski Szymon, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Franciszek, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Fabijan, Jastrzębski, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Paweł, Jastrzębski Adam15 persons on 15 hearths
Fifteen persons, fifteen hearths — this agrees with „(po 1 dymie)” and with the card's own total (2+15+2+1+1 = 21 = „Razem 21 dymów”). The set of persons is, down to the one person, the same as in T90 entry B on card 2), only in a different order and with three differences in the wording: „Marcina Dworczyka” instead of „Macieja Dworczyka”, „Fabijana” instead of „Fabiana”, „wdowy Jakubowej” instead of „Jakubowej wdowy”. None of the entries here is corrected or struck out — this card is clean, and it is this card that confirms that on card 2) in T90 the number of hearths is 15, and that the „Jana” crossed through in black there does count.
A DISCREPANCY BETWEEN THE YEARS, NOT AN ERROR OF READING: here the card writes „Marcina Dworczyka”, while T90 and T89 (card 2) have Maciej beside the same byname („Macieja Dworczyka”, „Macieja-Dworczyka”). I have checked the word under magnification and „Marcina” stands in it — the same shape as in „Marcina po Joachimie” two words further on in the same line. I record what is on the card; I make no reconciliation, because the merging of persons belongs to the stage of the index. Reported in the report.
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Krzysztof, Jastrzębski Jan, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Michał, Jastrzębski Szymon, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Franciszek, Jastrzębski Marcin «Dworczyk», Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Fabijan, Jastrzębski, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Paweł, Jastrzębski Adam15 persons on 15 hearths
Fifteen persons, fifteen hearths — this agrees with „(po 1 dymie)” and with the card's own total (2+15+2+1+1 = 21 = „Razem 21 dymów”). The set of persons is, down to the one person, the same as in T90 entry B on card 2), only in a different order and with three differences in the wording: „Marcina Dworczyka” instead of „Macieja Dworczyka”, „Fabijana” instead of „Fabiana”, „wdowy Jakubowej” instead of „Jakubowej wdowy”. None of the entries here is corrected or struck out — this card is clean, and it is this card that confirms that on card 2) in T90 the number of hearths is 15, and that the „Jana” crossed through in black there does count.
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Krzysztof, Jastrzębski Jan, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Mateusz, Jastrzębski Szymon, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Franciszek, Jastrzębski Marcin «Dworczyk», Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Fabijan, Jastrzębski, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Paweł, Jastrzębski Adam15 persons on 15 hearths
Fifteen persons, fifteen hearths — this agrees with „(po 1 dymie)” and with the card's own total (2+15+2+1+1 = 21 = „Razem 21 dymów”). The set of persons is, down to the one person, the same as in T90 entry B on card 2), only in a different order and with three differences in the wording: „Marcina Dworczyka” instead of „Macieja Dworczyka”, „Fabijana” instead of „Fabiana”, „wdowy Jakubowej” instead of „Jakubowej wdowy”. None of the entries here is corrected or struck out — this card is clean, and it is this card that confirms that on card 2) in T90 the number of hearths is 15, and that the „Jana” crossed through in black there does count.
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Krzysztof, Jastrzębski Jan, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Mateusz, Jastrzębski Michał, Jastrzębski Szymon, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Franciszek, Jastrzębski Marcin «Dworczyk», Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Fabijan, Jastrzębski, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Adam15 persons on 15 hearths
Fifteen persons, fifteen hearths — this agrees with „(po 1 dymie)” and with the card's own total (2+15+2+1+1 = 21 = „Razem 21 dymów”). The set of persons is, down to the one person, the same as in T90 entry B on card 2), only in a different order and with three differences in the wording: „Marcina Dworczyka” instead of „Macieja Dworczyka”, „Fabijana” instead of „Fabiana”, „wdowy Jakubowej” instead of „Jakubowej wdowy”. None of the entries here is corrected or struck out — this card is clean, and it is this card that confirms that on card 2) in T90 the number of hearths is 15, and that the „Jana” crossed through in black there does count.
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Krzysztof, Jastrzębski Jan, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Mateusz, Jastrzębski Michał, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Franciszek, Jastrzębski Marcin «Dworczyk», Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Fabijan, Jastrzębski, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Paweł, Jastrzębski Adam15 persons on 15 hearths
Fifteen persons, fifteen hearths — this agrees with „(po 1 dymie)” and with the card's own total (2+15+2+1+1 = 21 = „Razem 21 dymów”). The set of persons is, down to the one person, the same as in T90 entry B on card 2), only in a different order and with three differences in the wording: „Marcina Dworczyka” instead of „Macieja Dworczyka”, „Fabijana” instead of „Fabiana”, „wdowy Jakubowej” instead of „Jakubowej wdowy”. None of the entries here is corrected or struck out — this card is clean, and it is this card that confirms that on card 2) in T90 the number of hearths is 15, and that the „Jana” crossed through in black there does count.
the forename carried over the end of the line: „Szy-” / „mona”
Borki-KosyZbuczyn parish
The card gives no forename; the wording is in the plural („w części Jastrzębskich”) — a family holding, not a single person.
The second line of the left-hand column; beside it and the following ones the card now puts only a repetition mark („) instead of „cz.”.
The designation of the class of hearth the card repeats with a repetition mark after entry A; in square brackets, the expansion of that mark, not the wording of the card.
Borki-PaduchyZbuczyn parish
The start of the line („w części”) is rubbed and barely visible; the card repeats the number of hearths with a repetition mark after line 2 („dymu”) and the figure 1.
the forename [reading uncertain] — the card has the abbreviation „Wal” and right after it a question mark in brackets, „(?)”, put there by the maker of the card index himself; between „Wal” and the bracket a trace of an erased addition is visible (it reads like „ent”, that is, an abandoned attempt at „Walenty”). I do not expand the abbreviation — it could be Walenty, Walerian, or Walentyn
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Wacław2 persons on 2 hearths
The author first wrote „cz. Józefa Jastrzębskiego 1 d. dwor.”, struck out the last two members and added „Wacława Jastrzębskich = 2 d. d.”, joining the two brothers into one entry — after the correction two persons and two hearths.
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Józef2 persons on 2 hearths
The author first wrote „cz. Józefa Jastrzębskiego 1 d. dwor.”, struck out the last two members and added „Wacława Jastrzębskich = 2 d. d.”, joining the two brothers into one entry — after the correction two persons and two hearths.
The second (last) line of the right-hand column; the lower edge of the card cuts the record just below it.
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Wacław2 persons on 2 hearths
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Józef2 persons on 2 hearths
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Wacław2 persons on 2 hearths
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Józef2 persons on 2 hearths
Borki-SołdyZbuczyn parish
the forename written „Sebestjana” (with „e” in the second syllable); T90 on the same card has „Sebastiana”
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Sebastjan2 persons on 2 hearths
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Bartłomiej2 persons on 2 hearths
the forename written „Sebastjana”
the forename recorded „Sebastyana”, with a „y”
The forename in the line („Sebastjana”, with „tj”) is struck through and corrected above the line, in darker ink, to „Sebastiana”. Both forms give the same forename; I accept the author's correction.
the forename written „Sebastjana”
CelinyTrzebieszów parish
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Tomasz2 persons on 2 hearths
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Józef2 persons on 2 hearths
ChojaZbuczyn parish
The card gives no forename.
This card does not repeat the office („komornika ziemi Łukowskiej”) beside him — T90 gives it on card 2.
ChromnaZbuczyn parish
the card gives no forename
„vicesgerentā” with an abbreviation stroke over the final „a”. All the entries of this card carry the qualification „dymy wiejskie 2giej klasy” (repeated by repetition marks at B–F)
T90 (card 2) adds beside him the office: „vicesgerentā grodzkiego łukowskiego”
CielemęcZbuczyn parish
The card gives no forename; from T90 it follows that this is Antoni Jastrzębski, land chamberlain of the Łuków Land.
The cross-reference to the neighbouring village stands IN THE BODY OF THE ENTRY, not beside the total: the holding of Jastrzębski is „z częściami na wsi Choi złączona” (Choja, cards 1)–350). The breakdown adds up: 1 + 2 + 2 + 11 + 1 = 17 hearths. The numeral „1” in „o 1 gosp.” is encircled more thickly, as though corrected, but the reading is certain.
The expansions of the abbreviations in brackets come from the compiler of the card index and stand on the card. The propination is recorded clearly, in a separate line below the surname.
the same entry also names: Cielemęcki Wojciech, Domański Mikołaj3 persons on a holding without hearths
In this entry the card gives no forename for Jastrzębski. The surname of the holder of the pledge is written without the diacritic: „Domanskiego”.
A characterization of the village, not a list of hearths. O83 gives no forename for Jastrzębski.
Czerślparafia Łuków
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Paweł2 persons on 1 hearth
two persons on one hearth
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Józef2 persons on 1 hearth
two persons on one hearth
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Paweł2 persons on 1 hearth
TWO PERSONS ON ONE HEARTH — the card names Józef and Paweł Jastrzębski in a joint holding and gives beside it „dym 1” (without the phrase „po 1 dymie”, which stands beside entry 2). T94 on card 2 counts this holding in the same way („cz. Józefa i Pawła Jastrzębskich — 1 dym”), and so does T89 on card 3 („cz. Józefa i Pawła Jastrzębskich: 1 dwór”). In this one entry the marker stands AFTER the number of hearths, not before it.
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Józef2 persons on 1 hearth
TWO PERSONS ON ONE HEARTH — the card names Józef and Paweł Jastrzębski in a joint holding and gives beside it „dym 1” (without the phrase „po 1 dymie”, which stands beside entry 2). T94 on card 2 counts this holding in the same way („cz. Józefa i Pawła Jastrzębskich — 1 dym”), and so does T89 on card 3 („cz. Józefa i Pawła Jastrzębskich: 1 dwór”). In this one entry the marker stands AFTER the number of hearths, not before it.
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Paweł2 persons on 1 hearth
two persons on one hearth — the card gives one figure for the joint holding
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Józef2 persons on 1 hearth
two persons on one hearth — the card gives one figure for the joint holding
CzuryłyZbuczyn parish
One entry for the whole village, the numbering „1” editorial: the register does not divide Czuryty into holdings. The card gives no forename — the surname alone remains. „własn.” = własność, property; the figure „8” underlined. In 1775 the village has therefore eight hearths and another lord than in the years 1789–1794 (Cieciszowski, 20 hearths) — the card index does not say how it passed from hand to hand, and I add nothing here.
Gołaszynparafia Łuków
the surname on the card „Jastrzebskiego”
the marker on the card without the „ł”: „/n. p. of./”, I transcribe it literally; the surname written „Jastrzebskiego”
GrodziskZbuczyn parish
The card gives no forename (only T90, T89, T94 and T₀89 name him Józef, and T₀89 — Józef Benedykt). THE FIGURE CHECKED SEPARATELY, BECAUSE AT FIRST GLANCE IT COULD BE TAKEN FOR 29: at twentyfold magnification the second character consists of two separate strokes — a diagonal stroke descending to the left and a vertical stem crossing it and running out below, that is „4”; there is neither the closed upper loop nor the descent below the writing line that this hand's „9” has in „94 l.” and „98 l.” two lines above. The card's own arithmetic confirms it: 24 + 1 + 6 = 31 = „Ogółem dymów”.
The breakdown closes without remainder: 1 + 1 + 1 + 13 + 2 + 1 = 19. THE BREWERY AND THE INN read at six-times magnification — „1 brow.” and „1 karcz.” stand side by side, both abbreviations legible letter for letter, without a shadow of doubt; this is the only occurrence of such establishments in the whole village. The last item is written with the abbreviation „1 d. rzemieślniczy”; I expand the letter „d.” as „dom” (house) (the card index knows both keys — „dom rzemieślniczy” and „dym rzemieślniczy”), but THE ABBREVIATION ALONE DOES NOT SETTLE which of the two the author of the card index used — for the count of hearths it makes no difference, since either way it is one hearth. The figure „2” in „2 chał. bez ogrod.” is thick and written over something (reworked); the reckoning 1+1+1+13+2+1 = 19 confirms that „2” stands there. The office: just land judge of Łuków (sędziego ziemskiego łukowskiego), without the civil-military commissioner of T90 and without the registrar of the castle court (regent grodzki) of O83.
A list of possessors, 1789 — without hearths, the hearths figure empty in accordance with the rule for T₀89. PROPINATION RECORDED OUTRIGHT, as the last word of the line, in the abbreviation „propin.”. The word read at a twentyfold magnification, letter by letter: p-r-o-p-i-n, with the abbreviation's dot; it is neither „propon.” nor „posses.” — the reading is certain, without reservation. This is the only occurrence of propination in this village. A TWO-PART FORENAME ONLY HERE: „Józefa Benedykta”; T90, T89 and T94 have „Józefa” alone, O83 gives no forename at all. The same „Józef Benedykt Jastrzębski, sędzia ziemski łukowski” stands at Po99 of Krasusze Łęcznowola — likewise with propination.
The figure „17” is underlined with a plain stroke. Of the eight extracts for this village, only T90 gives Jastrzębski TWO offices at once — „sędziego ziemskiego i komisarza cyw.-wojsk. łukowskiego”; T89 and T₀89 have the office of land judge of Łuków (sędzia ziemski) alone, and O83 (1783) calls him, further, registrar of the castle court of Łuków (regent grodzki). I do not smooth over the discrepancy; I transcribe both offices into the office as they stand on the card. The phrase „dymów wiejskich 2giej klasy” occurs in this block only here — in entries B and C it is replaced with marks of repetition. This is the same Józef Benedykt Jastrzębski, land judge of Łuków, who stands at the head of T89 and Po99 in Krasusy Łęcznowola.
The figure „17” is underlined with a plain stroke. T94 gives no office at all beside Jastrzębski — unlike O83, T89, T90 and T₀89; I leave the office empty, I do not add it from other extracts. The number of hearths is the same as in T90 (17).
A characterization of the village, not a list of hearths — hence the hearths figure is empty. The number in brackets I read as the Roman „IX”, as at the other villages. O83 gives no forename for Jastrzębski. AN OFFICE DIFFERENT FROM THE OTHER EXTRACTS: here „regenta grodzkiego łukowskiego”, while T89, T₀89 and T90 have „sędziego ziemskiego łukowskiego” (in T90 with the addition of the civil-military commissioner). Both words — „regenta” and „grodzkiego” — are read at a sixfold magnification and certain; I do not smooth the discrepancy away. It falls into a sequence of promotions (O83 is the year 1783, the registers 1789–1790), but the card index nowhere says so, so I leave both forms side by side. THE NAME OF THE VILLAGE WRITTEN HERE „GRODZISZK”: at a twelvefold magnification, after the dotted „i” come TWO separate marks before the final „k” — first a narrow „s”, then a „z” — whereas in the heading of T89 on the same card („Grodzisk”) only one such mark stands between the „i” and the „k”. I bring the form „Grodziszk” into the variants and do not reduce it to „Grodzisk”. The words „cząstki szlacheckie” name the type of ownership directly — a petty-noble village with one holding markedly larger.
JasionkaZbuczyn parish
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Tomasz2 persons on 2 hearths
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Józef2 persons on 2 hearths
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Tomasz2 persons on 2 hearths
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Andrzej2 persons on 2 hearths
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Tomasz2 persons on 2 hearths
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Andrzej2 persons on 2 hearths
Wólka KamiennaZbuczyn parish
One item for the whole village, the numbering „1” editorial. The buildings are written out: „dwór” without a numeral I count as 1; 1 + 2 + 4 + 9 = 16, in accordance with the total given by the card, „razem 16 dymów” (underlined). FINDING: the register of 1789 counts the village together with holdings lying IN OTHER VILLAGES — „z częściami na wsiach Rzążewie, Chromnej i Lipinach złączona” — that is, the 16 hearths are not the number of hearths of Kamienowa Wólka itself; hence the discrepancy with T90 and T94 (12 each). All three villages lie in the neighbourhood, in the parish of Zbuczyn. The word „niegdyś” („niegdy”) makes Wincenty Jastrzębski deceased — hence the mark for a deceased person = true and the status „sukcesorowie”. The office of vice-gerent of the Łuków castle court the card links here directly with Wincenty — the same designation without a forename stands in O83 on card 1). The word after „Łukowskiego” I read „dziedzizna” [reading uncertain: „dziedziczna” is also possible].
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Wincenty †2 persons on a holding without hearths
A list of possessors for 1789 — without hearths, hence the hearths figure = null. The village stands in it as a single whole: the successors of the deceased Wincenty Jastrzębski as owners, Rozalia Jastrzębska as possessor for life („w pos. dożyw.” = w posesji dożywotniej, in possession for life). Rozalia's family name [reading uncertain] — see the note beside the person.
A woman: the surname stands on the card in the feminine form („Jastrzębskiej”), the forename in full („Rozalii”). The card also gives her family name in the formula „z …kich”; the ending is legible with certainty, the beginning is not — I read „z Burokickich” [reading uncertain], because after „Buro” stands a letter with a tall loop crossed by a bar (the shape of an „ł” or a „t”) which I cannot resolve. I do not expand it into any known surname and do not record it in the the surname field.
the same entry also names: Jastrzębska Rozalia2 persons on a holding without hearths
A list of possessors for 1789 — without hearths, hence the hearths figure = null. The village stands in it as a single whole: the successors of the deceased Wincenty Jastrzębski as owners, Rozalia Jastrzębska as possessor for life („w pos. dożyw.” = w posesji dożywotniej, in possession for life). Rozalia's family name [reading uncertain] — see the note beside the person.
One item for the whole village, the numbering „1” editorial — the village is not divided into holdings. The entry is written in blue ink, unlike the rest of the card. The figure „12” is underlined. The formula „dymów wiejskich 2giej klasy” runs just as it does at Gozd (card 1), Annonin (card), Lipniaki (card 1) and the grange of Kij (card). The hereditary owner is not a person but the successors of the deceased Wincenty Jastrzębski — hence the mark for a deceased person = true.
One item for the whole village, the numbering „1” editorial. The figure „12” is underlined with a wavy stroke and agrees with T90. The abbreviated forename „W.” I DO NOT EXPAND: „W[incenty]” would suggest itself, but in 1789 and 1790 Wincenty Jastrzębski is already called deceased on these same cards („sukcesorów niegdyś Wincentego”, „dziedz. sukces. Wincentego”), so in the register of 1794 someone else of that family most probably stands under „W.” [I do not decide]. The card gives neither an office nor any mention of successors — unlike T89 and T90.
ŁęcznowolaTrzebieszów parish
the card gives no forename
SmolankaTrzebieszów parish
the card gives no forename
Wólka KonopnaTrzebieszów parish
the whole entry is struck out on the card and excluded from the numbering (the later entries were renumbered 24→23, 25→24, 26→25); its 1 hearth does not enter the total „Ogółem: 38 dymów”, and so hearths = null
ZaolszynieTrzebieszów parish
KurówTrzebieszów parish
the figure „1” beside „o … gosp.” thickly written over
the card distinguishes him by the addition „(2giego)” from Józef Jastrzębski of entry 2
the card adds „pańszczyzna” — a term from outside the vocabulary of the annotations; I leave it in the note
Ługi WielkieZbuczyn parish
The number was corrected on the card from 10 to 9 after the entry concerning the parish benefice (probostwo) had been struck out. The card writes „Jastrzebskiego” (without an ogonek); I harmonise it to Jastrzębski.
Łukówparafia Łuków
The first entry of the list of the town. „na mieście tymże” — checked at sixfold magnification, I read „mieście” (not „miejscu”). The words „Alexego Jastrzębskiego” are written twice: once cleanly, once lower and struck through with a horizontal stroke — a scribal correction, not two persons.
the forename written with an „x”: „Alexego” (Aleksy)
Stare OkninyZbuczyn parish
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Szymon2 persons on 2 hearths
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Jan2 persons on 2 hearths
„z Bracią” (with his brothers) — the card does not name the brothers, so I do not enter them as persons; two hearths for Marcin with his brothers.
The card gives no forename.
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Józef2 persons on 2 hearths
The surname on the card without the tail: „Jastrzebskich”. In T90 (card 3, entry I) this family is represented by other persons — Franc. and the successors of Marcin.
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Adam2 persons on 2 hearths
The surname on the card without the tail: „Jastrzebskich”. In T90 (card 3, entry I) this family is represented by other persons — Franc. and the successors of Marcin.
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Marcin †2 persons on 2 hearths
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Franc[iszek]2 persons on 2 hearths
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Marcin †2 persons on 2 hearths
The first entry of card 6; before it stands the heading „c. d. T94 –”. The same possessors as in T90 entry I („Franc. i sukces. Marcina”).
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Franciszek2 persons on 2 hearths
The first entry of card 6; before it stands the heading „c. d. T94 –”. The same possessors as in T90 entry I („Franc. i sukces. Marcina”).
OlędyZbuczyn parish
The card gives no forename. The entry begins with the word written out in full, „część.”, the further entries with the abbreviation „cz.”.
Radomyśl SędkiZbuczyn parish
the card gives no forename
Radzików-StopkiZbuczyn parish
the card gives no forename; the figure „9” is underlined
Roleparafia Łuków
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Jan, Jastrzębski Tomasz, Jastrzębski Jakób4 persons on 4 hearths
The forename „Jakóba,” is added above the line, in smaller writing, above the word „Wojciechowej” — an addition after the fact. Without it there would be three persons on four hearths; with it the reckoning closes. A WOMAN: „Wojciechowej” — a form derived from the husband's name, without a forename of her own, recorded literally in the recorded form of the name. The surname in the masculine plural („Jastrzebskich”), and so entered as it stands.
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Jan, Jastrzębski, Jastrzębski Tomasz4 persons on 4 hearths
The forename „Jakóba,” is added above the line, in smaller writing, above the word „Wojciechowej” — an addition after the fact. Without it there would be three persons on four hearths; with it the reckoning closes. A WOMAN: „Wojciechowej” — a form derived from the husband's name, without a forename of her own, recorded literally in the recorded form of the name. The surname in the masculine plural („Jastrzebskich”), and so entered as it stands.
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski, Jastrzębski Tomasz, Jastrzębski Jakób4 persons on 4 hearths
The forename „Jakóba,” is added above the line, in smaller writing, above the word „Wojciechowej” — an addition after the fact. Without it there would be three persons on four hearths; with it the reckoning closes. A WOMAN: „Wojciechowej” — a form derived from the husband's name, without a forename of her own, recorded literally in the recorded form of the name. The surname in the masculine plural („Jastrzebskich”), and so entered as it stands.
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Jan, Jastrzębski, Jastrzębski Jakób4 persons on 4 hearths
The forename „Jakóba,” is added above the line, in smaller writing, above the word „Wojciechowej” — an addition after the fact. Without it there would be three persons on four hearths; with it the reckoning closes. A WOMAN: „Wojciechowej” — a form derived from the husband's name, without a forename of her own, recorded literally in the recorded form of the name. The surname in the masculine plural („Jastrzebskich”), and so entered as it stands.
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Jakób, Jastrzębski Jan3 persons on 3 hearths
T90 (f. 689, entry 3) names four in this family (Jakób, Jan, Franciszek and Wojciech) on 3 hearths, T94 (f. 691) the same four on 4 hearths — here three on 3 hearths. A discrepancy of the sources, not an error of reading.
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Franciszek, Jastrzębski Jan3 persons on 3 hearths
T90 (f. 689, entry 3) names four in this family (Jakób, Jan, Franciszek and Wojciech) on 3 hearths, T94 (f. 691) the same four on 4 hearths — here three on 3 hearths. A discrepancy of the sources, not an error of reading.
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Jakób, Jastrzębski Franciszek3 persons on 3 hearths
T90 (f. 689, entry 3) names four in this family (Jakób, Jan, Franciszek and Wojciech) on 3 hearths, T94 (f. 691) the same four on 4 hearths — here three on 3 hearths. A discrepancy of the sources, not an error of reading.
Covered by the brace „nie wysiewają 10 korcy” (entries 17–29).
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Jakób, Jastrzębski Jan, Jastrzębski Wojciech4 persons on 3 hearths
FOUR forenames, THREE hearths. The figure 3 is certain: the sum of all the entries of T90 gives exactly 55, that is the „Razem dymów 55” of f. 690. The card does not explain the discrepancy; the semicolon and the dash after „Jana” suggest that „Franciszek i Wojciech” stand on one hearth, but that is interpretation, not the text of the card. For comparison T94 (f. 690) gives the same four persons 4 hearths, and T89 (f. 693, entry 11) names only three Jastrzębskis on 3 hearths. The marker /n. pł. of./ refers to the whole group.
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Jan, Jastrzębski Franciszek, Jastrzębski Wojciech4 persons on 3 hearths
FOUR forenames, THREE hearths. The figure 3 is certain: the sum of all the entries of T90 gives exactly 55, that is the „Razem dymów 55” of f. 690. The card does not explain the discrepancy; the semicolon and the dash after „Jana” suggest that „Franciszek i Wojciech” stand on one hearth, but that is interpretation, not the text of the card. For comparison T94 (f. 690) gives the same four persons 4 hearths, and T89 (f. 693, entry 11) names only three Jastrzębskis on 3 hearths. The marker /n. pł. of./ refers to the whole group.
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Jakób, Jastrzębski Franciszek, Jastrzębski Wojciech4 persons on 3 hearths
FOUR forenames, THREE hearths. The figure 3 is certain: the sum of all the entries of T90 gives exactly 55, that is the „Razem dymów 55” of f. 690. The card does not explain the discrepancy; the semicolon and the dash after „Jana” suggest that „Franciszek i Wojciech” stand on one hearth, but that is interpretation, not the text of the card. For comparison T94 (f. 690) gives the same four persons 4 hearths, and T89 (f. 693, entry 11) names only three Jastrzębskis on 3 hearths. The marker /n. pł. of./ refers to the whole group.
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Jakób, Jastrzębski Jan, Jastrzębski Franciszek4 persons on 3 hearths
FOUR forenames, THREE hearths. The figure 3 is certain: the sum of all the entries of T90 gives exactly 55, that is the „Razem dymów 55” of f. 690. The card does not explain the discrepancy; the semicolon and the dash after „Jana” suggest that „Franciszek i Wojciech” stand on one hearth, but that is interpretation, not the text of the card. For comparison T94 (f. 690) gives the same four persons 4 hearths, and T89 (f. 693, entry 11) names only three Jastrzębskis on 3 hearths. The marker /n. pł. of./ refers to the whole group.
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Jakób, Jastrzębski Jan, Jastrzębski Wojciech4 persons on 3 hearths
Four persons, three hearths. This is no error of reading: T90 counts it in the same way on the same card („cz. Jakóba, Jana; – Franciszka i Wojciecha Jastrzębskich /n. pł. of./ po 1 dymie – dymów 3”), and the card's total (55) confirms the figure 3. The card does not say which two share a hearth.
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Jan, Jastrzębski Franc[iszek], Jastrzębski Wojciech4 persons on 3 hearths
Four persons, three hearths. This is no error of reading: T90 counts it in the same way on the same card („cz. Jakóba, Jana; – Franciszka i Wojciecha Jastrzębskich /n. pł. of./ po 1 dymie – dymów 3”), and the card's total (55) confirms the figure 3. The card does not say which two share a hearth.
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Jakób, Jastrzębski Franc[iszek], Jastrzębski Wojciech4 persons on 3 hearths
Four persons, three hearths. This is no error of reading: T90 counts it in the same way on the same card („cz. Jakóba, Jana; – Franciszka i Wojciecha Jastrzębskich /n. pł. of./ po 1 dymie – dymów 3”), and the card's total (55) confirms the figure 3. The card does not say which two share a hearth.
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Jakób, Jastrzębski Jan, Jastrzębski Franc[iszek]4 persons on 3 hearths
Four persons, three hearths. This is no error of reading: T90 counts it in the same way on the same card („cz. Jakóba, Jana; – Franciszka i Wojciecha Jastrzębskich /n. pł. of./ po 1 dymie – dymów 3”), and the card's total (55) confirms the figure 3. The card does not say which two share a hearth.
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Wojciech2 persons on a holding without hearths
The entry is struck through in its entirety on the card — together with the figure 1 and with the leader dots running to the column. It does not enter the total „Razem – 55 dymów” (the reckoning closes only without it), and so the hearths figure = null. The same Franciszek and Wojciech Jastrzębski are already taken in in entry 3.
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Franc[iszek]2 persons on a holding without hearths
The entry is struck through in its entirety on the card — together with the figure 1 and with the leader dots running to the column. It does not enter the total „Razem – 55 dymów” (the reckoning closes only without it), and so the hearths figure = null. The same Franciszek and Wojciech Jastrzębski are already taken in in entry 3.
RzązewZbuczyn parish
on the card „grodzkiego” is struck out, and above the line „łukowskiego” is added; the office written „viesgerenta” (= wicesgerent, vicesgerens) [reading uncertain]
the office written „viesgerenta” [reading uncertain]
TarczeZbuczyn parish
A WOMAN with a forename of her own; the surname in the feminine form as it stands on the card. In T90 (card 1) the same person is called „Marjanny Jastrzębskiej wdowy” and has 2 hearths, here the description „wdowy” is absent and the hearth is one — the discrepancy between the years is recorded, not smoothed over.
A WOMAN with a forename of her own, the surname in the feminine form as it stands on the card. The forename is written here „Maryanny” — with a „y”, otherwise than „Marjanny” in T90, T89 and T94. The description „wdowy”, which T90 and T94 give, this list does not repeat.
A WOMAN with a forename of her own, the surname in the feminine form as it stands on the card. The forename written „Marjanny” (= Marjanna/Marianna). A holding of two hearths — the same figure that „cz. Pawła Jastrzębskiego” has in T75; the widow is most likely his, but the card does not say so and I do not add it to the data.
A WOMAN with a forename of her own, the surname in the feminine form as it stands on the card. Here the description „wdowy” stands BEFORE the forename (in T90: „Marjanny Jastrzębskiej wdowy”). The forename written „Marjanny” — just as in T90 and T89, and otherwise than in T₀89 on the same card, where „Maryanny” stands.
Tchórzew-PlewkiZbuczyn parish
The surname on the card without the tail: „Jastrzebskiego”.
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Walenty, Jastrzębski Jakub3 persons on 2 hearths
THREE PERSONS, TWO HEARTHS. The wording itself explains it: „Walentego i Franc.” are bound together by the conjunction „i” (one hearth for the two), Jakub counts separately. Two other extracts of the same village confirm it: T90 on card 2) („cz. Walentego i Franc. oraz Jakóba i Jana Jastrzebskich po 1 dymie – 2”) and T94 on card 5) („cz. Walentego i Franciszka, Jakóba i Jana, Jastrzębskich – po 1 dymie – 2 d.”). Between „Franc.” and „Jakuba” stands a small sign inserted above the line — at sixteenfold magnification one sees an oblique stroke, beside it a vertical shaft with a flag and a closing arc; it reads like „⁽¹⁾” or „/1/” [reading uncertain]. The same sign, in a simplified shape (the oblique stroke alone), returns in T94 on card 5) in exactly the same place — it divides the groups counted at one hearth each. THE NOTE to which it would refer is on none of the seven cards of Plewki (the only note in this village, „1.) ten sam” on card 6), concerns Paweł Tarkowski in T₀89, not the Jastrzębskis). The surname on the card „Jastrzebskich”, without the tail under the „e”; the headword form Jastrzębski. The figure „2” in „= 2 d.” is outlined thickly, as if corrected [the reading „2” is certain — only with it does the total 24 close].
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Walenty, Jastrzębski Franc[iszek]3 persons on 2 hearths
THREE PERSONS, TWO HEARTHS. The wording itself explains it: „Walentego i Franc.” are bound together by the conjunction „i” (one hearth for the two), Jakub counts separately. Two other extracts of the same village confirm it: T90 on card 2) („cz. Walentego i Franc. oraz Jakóba i Jana Jastrzebskich po 1 dymie – 2”) and T94 on card 5) („cz. Walentego i Franciszka, Jakóba i Jana, Jastrzębskich – po 1 dymie – 2 d.”). Between „Franc.” and „Jakuba” stands a small sign inserted above the line — at sixteenfold magnification one sees an oblique stroke, beside it a vertical shaft with a flag and a closing arc; it reads like „⁽¹⁾” or „/1/” [reading uncertain]. The same sign, in a simplified shape (the oblique stroke alone), returns in T94 on card 5) in exactly the same place — it divides the groups counted at one hearth each. THE NOTE to which it would refer is on none of the seven cards of Plewki (the only note in this village, „1.) ten sam” on card 6), concerns Paweł Tarkowski in T₀89, not the Jastrzębskis). The surname on the card „Jastrzebskich”, without the tail under the „e”; the headword form Jastrzębski. The figure „2” in „= 2 d.” is outlined thickly, as if corrected [the reading „2” is certain — only with it does the total 24 close].
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Franc[iszek], Jastrzębski Jakub3 persons on 2 hearths
THREE PERSONS, TWO HEARTHS. The wording itself explains it: „Walentego i Franc.” are bound together by the conjunction „i” (one hearth for the two), Jakub counts separately. Two other extracts of the same village confirm it: T90 on card 2) („cz. Walentego i Franc. oraz Jakóba i Jana Jastrzebskich po 1 dymie – 2”) and T94 on card 5) („cz. Walentego i Franciszka, Jakóba i Jana, Jastrzębskich – po 1 dymie – 2 d.”). Between „Franc.” and „Jakuba” stands a small sign inserted above the line — at sixteenfold magnification one sees an oblique stroke, beside it a vertical shaft with a flag and a closing arc; it reads like „⁽¹⁾” or „/1/” [reading uncertain]. The same sign, in a simplified shape (the oblique stroke alone), returns in T94 on card 5) in exactly the same place — it divides the groups counted at one hearth each. THE NOTE to which it would refer is on none of the seven cards of Plewki (the only note in this village, „1.) ten sam” on card 6), concerns Paweł Tarkowski in T₀89, not the Jastrzębskis). The surname on the card „Jastrzebskich”, without the tail under the „e”; the headword form Jastrzębski. The figure „2” in „= 2 d.” is outlined thickly, as if corrected [the reading „2” is certain — only with it does the total 24 close].
Left-hand column, line 4.
Left-hand column, line 8.
the same entry also names: Krasuski Józef2 persons on a holding without hearths
Two persons and two roles: the holding belongs to Jan Jastrzębski, but it is held („w pos.” = w posesji, in possession) by Józef Krasuski. The abbreviation „pos.” the card does not resolve; I understand it as in the rest of the card index — possession, the tenure of another man's holding. The entry is taken in by the vertical annotation „nie wysiewają 10 korcy”, running along the whole right-hand side of the column on card 7). The inscription takes in ALL nine entries of this card (from „cz. Jana Jastrzębskiego” at the top to „…zaprzys. Teresa Tarkowska” at the bottom) — the verb stands in the plural („wysiewają”), because it concerns them together.
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Walenty, Jastrzębski Jakób, Jastrzębski Jan4 persons on 2 hearths
The letter C stands on this card for the second time — the first C (Michał and Grzegorz Tchórzewski) is struck out higher up; this line stands between I and J, so the order of the letters is disturbed [the reading of the letter is uncertain, but the shape is a plain „C”]. Four persons against two hearths: „po 1 dymie – 2” counts HOLDINGS, and the card binds them with conjunctions into two pairs — {Walenty i Franc.} and {Jakób i Jan}. The forename „Franc” is abbreviated, without a full stop; I expand it „Franc[iszek]”.
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Walenty, Jastrzębski Franc[iszek], Jastrzębski Jan4 persons on 2 hearths
The letter C stands on this card for the second time — the first C (Michał and Grzegorz Tchórzewski) is struck out higher up; this line stands between I and J, so the order of the letters is disturbed [the reading of the letter is uncertain, but the shape is a plain „C”]. Four persons against two hearths: „po 1 dymie – 2” counts HOLDINGS, and the card binds them with conjunctions into two pairs — {Walenty i Franc.} and {Jakób i Jan}. The forename „Franc” is abbreviated, without a full stop; I expand it „Franc[iszek]”.
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Walenty, Jastrzębski Franc[iszek], Jastrzębski Jakób4 persons on 2 hearths
The letter C stands on this card for the second time — the first C (Michał and Grzegorz Tchórzewski) is struck out higher up; this line stands between I and J, so the order of the letters is disturbed [the reading of the letter is uncertain, but the shape is a plain „C”]. Four persons against two hearths: „po 1 dymie – 2” counts HOLDINGS, and the card binds them with conjunctions into two pairs — {Walenty i Franc.} and {Jakób i Jan}. The forename „Franc” is abbreviated, without a full stop; I expand it „Franc[iszek]”.
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Franc[iszek], Jastrzębski Jakób, Jastrzębski Jan4 persons on 2 hearths
The letter C stands on this card for the second time — the first C (Michał and Grzegorz Tchórzewski) is struck out higher up; this line stands between I and J, so the order of the letters is disturbed [the reading of the letter is uncertain, but the shape is a plain „C”]. Four persons against two hearths: „po 1 dymie – 2” counts HOLDINGS, and the card binds them with conjunctions into two pairs — {Walenty i Franc.} and {Jakób i Jan}. The forename „Franc” is abbreviated, without a full stop; I expand it „Franc[iszek]”.
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Walenty, Jastrzębski Jakób, Jastrzębski Jan4 persons on 2 hearths
FOUR PERSONS, TWO HEARTHS — and the card itself explains it: the pairs bound by the conjunction „i” („Walenty i Franciszek”, „Jakób i Jan”) count at one hearth each. T90 on card 2) confirms it: „cz. Walentego i Franc. oraz Jakóba i Jana Jastrzebskich po 1 dymie – 2”. Before „Jakóba” a small oblique sign is set — a stroke inserted above the line, dividing the two pairs; the same sign (there richer, reading like „⁽¹⁾” or „/1/”) stands in T89 on card 3) in the same place [reading uncertain as to the shape of the sign; that it divides the groups follows from the reckoning].
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Walenty, Jastrzębski Franciszek, Jastrzębski Jan4 persons on 2 hearths
FOUR PERSONS, TWO HEARTHS — and the card itself explains it: the pairs bound by the conjunction „i” („Walenty i Franciszek”, „Jakób i Jan”) count at one hearth each. T90 on card 2) confirms it: „cz. Walentego i Franc. oraz Jakóba i Jana Jastrzebskich po 1 dymie – 2”. Before „Jakóba” a small oblique sign is set — a stroke inserted above the line, dividing the two pairs; the same sign (there richer, reading like „⁽¹⁾” or „/1/”) stands in T89 on card 3) in the same place [reading uncertain as to the shape of the sign; that it divides the groups follows from the reckoning].
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Walenty, Jastrzębski Franciszek, Jastrzębski Jakób4 persons on 2 hearths
FOUR PERSONS, TWO HEARTHS — and the card itself explains it: the pairs bound by the conjunction „i” („Walenty i Franciszek”, „Jakób i Jan”) count at one hearth each. T90 on card 2) confirms it: „cz. Walentego i Franc. oraz Jakóba i Jana Jastrzebskich po 1 dymie – 2”. Before „Jakóba” a small oblique sign is set — a stroke inserted above the line, dividing the two pairs; the same sign (there richer, reading like „⁽¹⁾” or „/1/”) stands in T89 on card 3) in the same place [reading uncertain as to the shape of the sign; that it divides the groups follows from the reckoning].
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Franciszek, Jastrzębski Jakób, Jastrzębski Jan4 persons on 2 hearths
FOUR PERSONS, TWO HEARTHS — and the card itself explains it: the pairs bound by the conjunction „i” („Walenty i Franciszek”, „Jakób i Jan”) count at one hearth each. T90 on card 2) confirms it: „cz. Walentego i Franc. oraz Jakóba i Jana Jastrzebskich po 1 dymie – 2”. Before „Jakóba” a small oblique sign is set — a stroke inserted above the line, dividing the two pairs; the same sign (there richer, reading like „⁽¹⁾” or „/1/”) stands in T89 on card 3) in the same place [reading uncertain as to the shape of the sign; that it divides the groups follows from the reckoning].
ZabłocieZbuczyn parish
the card gives no forename. This is the only extract of Zabłocie in which Jastrzębski appears — in the T90 of this village he is absent.
Zarzeczeparafia Łuków
ZdanyZbuczyn parish
The last entry of T75. Jastrzębski appears at Zdany here only — in T90 this surname is no longer present.
This surname in full edition of the hearth-tax registers — together with the search across all persons, the comparison of figures through the registers, the modern map and the Perthées engraving of 1786.
