Parish of Zbuczyn, łukowski county.
spellings on the cards: Radomysl Sendki, Radomyśl Sendki, Radomyśl Sędki, Radomysl, Radomyśl, Sętkis, Radomyśl Sętki
district of łukowski · parish of Zbuczyn · cards 1), 2)
a village of noble holdings, in the hands of the Radomyskis (with the byname Sendek), the Krasuskis and minor outside possessors; T75 – 21 hearths, T89 – 10 hearths [T75, T89]
| Year | Source | Entries | Hearths |
|---|
| T75 | Hearth tax register 1775 | 11 | 21 |
| T89 | Hearth tax register 1789 | 4 | 10 |
Without an extract for 1790 and 1794 — no card of this village carries that tariff. It is a missing extract in the card index, not a gap in the numbering of the cards.
Caveats on the years' registers (2)
What the compiler noted beside the entry itself, and what the table above does not show:
- T75 — The list begins on card 1 (card 1) with entries 1–9 and ends on card 2 (card 2) with entries 10–11 and the underlined own total „Razem dymów 21”, standing in the top right-hand corner of card 2. The numbering of entries 1)–11) is on the card, not editorial.
- T89 — The whole extract is written in pencil, in a paler and greyer hand than the ink of T75 above. The card's own total, „10 d.”, stands below a rule in the bottom right-hand corner of the card, beneath the value of the last entry („= 2 d.”). The heading here has the form „Sędki” (with the tail), whereas T75 writes „Sendki”.
The card-index entries
Every extract for this locality in the wording of the cards, year by year. One block is one occurrence: this person, in this year. At a collective item the same card text stands beside every person named — because the card names them together and they must not be separated. The hearths given at a collective item are an equal division among those named, not a reading.
1775 T75Hearth tax register 1775
WysokińskiJakub†
T751 hearthsuccessors† deceased1) a. Sukces. Jakóba Wysokińskiego – dym 1,card 1)
The entry begins with a single letter „a.” instead of the usual „cz.”; the glyph is clearly different from the „cz.” in entries 2–4 and 6–9 of the same card [reading uncertain].
BrzęzewskiWojciech†
T751 hearthsuccessors† deceased2) cz. sukces. Wojciecha Brzęzewskiego – dym 1,card 1)
The surname is written „Brzęzewskiego” — the fourth letter with a clear tail, then „-zewskiego” [reading uncertain]. Brzozowski is attested in the area (SLOWNIK-OKOLICY), but I do not bend the card to fit the dictionary.
ZdanowskiKrzysztof
T751 hearth3) cz. Krzysztofa Zdanowskiego – dym 1,card 1)
RadomyskiFranciszek«Sendek»
T756 · share of 0.864) cz. Pacoła, Pawła i Franciszka, Mateusza, Jana, Wawrzyńca, Michała Sendka – Radomyskich po 1 dymie – dymów 6,card 1)
the same entry also names: Radomyski Pacoł, Radomyski Paweł, Radomyski Mateusz, Radomyski Jan, Radomyski Wawrzyniec, Radomyski Michał «Sendek»7 persons on 6 hearths
Seven forenames, six hearths: the card joins „Pawła i Franciszka” with a conjunction, which gives six units of 1 hearth each. I read the first forename from the genitive „Pacoła”; I have not managed to identify or expand it — the nominative form „Pacoł” is my own reconstruction [reading uncertain]. „Sendka” beside Michał is a byname — the family surname stands only at the end of the entry („Radomyskich”). Beneath the word „Radomyskich” runs a decorative flourish of the pen, not text.
RadomyskiJan
T756 · share of 0.864) cz. Pacoła, Pawła i Franciszka, Mateusza, Jana, Wawrzyńca, Michała Sendka – Radomyskich po 1 dymie – dymów 6,card 1)
the same entry also names: Radomyski Pacoł, Radomyski Paweł, Radomyski Franciszek, Radomyski Mateusz, Radomyski Wawrzyniec, Radomyski Michał «Sendek»7 persons on 6 hearths
Seven forenames, six hearths: the card joins „Pawła i Franciszka” with a conjunction, which gives six units of 1 hearth each. I read the first forename from the genitive „Pacoła”; I have not managed to identify or expand it — the nominative form „Pacoł” is my own reconstruction [reading uncertain]. „Sendka” beside Michał is a byname — the family surname stands only at the end of the entry („Radomyskich”). Beneath the word „Radomyskich” runs a decorative flourish of the pen, not text.
RadomyskiMateusz
T756 · share of 0.864) cz. Pacoła, Pawła i Franciszka, Mateusza, Jana, Wawrzyńca, Michała Sendka – Radomyskich po 1 dymie – dymów 6,card 1)
the same entry also names: Radomyski Pacoł, Radomyski Paweł, Radomyski Franciszek, Radomyski Jan, Radomyski Wawrzyniec, Radomyski Michał «Sendek»7 persons on 6 hearths
Seven forenames, six hearths: the card joins „Pawła i Franciszka” with a conjunction, which gives six units of 1 hearth each. I read the first forename from the genitive „Pacoła”; I have not managed to identify or expand it — the nominative form „Pacoł” is my own reconstruction [reading uncertain]. „Sendka” beside Michał is a byname — the family surname stands only at the end of the entry („Radomyskich”). Beneath the word „Radomyskich” runs a decorative flourish of the pen, not text.
RadomyskiMichał«Sendek»
T756 · share of 0.864) cz. Pacoła, Pawła i Franciszka, Mateusza, Jana, Wawrzyńca, Michała Sendka – Radomyskich po 1 dymie – dymów 6,card 1)
the same entry also names: Radomyski Pacoł, Radomyski Paweł, Radomyski Franciszek, Radomyski Mateusz, Radomyski Jan, Radomyski Wawrzyniec7 persons on 6 hearths
Seven forenames, six hearths: the card joins „Pawła i Franciszka” with a conjunction, which gives six units of 1 hearth each. I read the first forename from the genitive „Pacoła”; I have not managed to identify or expand it — the nominative form „Pacoł” is my own reconstruction [reading uncertain]. „Sendka” beside Michał is a byname — the family surname stands only at the end of the entry („Radomyskich”). Beneath the word „Radomyskich” runs a decorative flourish of the pen, not text.
RadomyskiPacoł
T756 · share of 0.864) cz. Pacoła, Pawła i Franciszka, Mateusza, Jana, Wawrzyńca, Michała Sendka – Radomyskich po 1 dymie – dymów 6,card 1)
the same entry also names: Radomyski Paweł, Radomyski Franciszek, Radomyski Mateusz, Radomyski Jan, Radomyski Wawrzyniec, Radomyski Michał «Sendek»7 persons on 6 hearths
Seven forenames, six hearths: the card joins „Pawła i Franciszka” with a conjunction, which gives six units of 1 hearth each. I read the first forename from the genitive „Pacoła”; I have not managed to identify or expand it — the nominative form „Pacoł” is my own reconstruction [reading uncertain]. „Sendka” beside Michał is a byname — the family surname stands only at the end of the entry („Radomyskich”). Beneath the word „Radomyskich” runs a decorative flourish of the pen, not text.
RadomyskiPaweł
T756 · share of 0.864) cz. Pacoła, Pawła i Franciszka, Mateusza, Jana, Wawrzyńca, Michała Sendka – Radomyskich po 1 dymie – dymów 6,card 1)
the same entry also names: Radomyski Pacoł, Radomyski Franciszek, Radomyski Mateusz, Radomyski Jan, Radomyski Wawrzyniec, Radomyski Michał «Sendek»7 persons on 6 hearths
Seven forenames, six hearths: the card joins „Pawła i Franciszka” with a conjunction, which gives six units of 1 hearth each. I read the first forename from the genitive „Pacoła”; I have not managed to identify or expand it — the nominative form „Pacoł” is my own reconstruction [reading uncertain]. „Sendka” beside Michał is a byname — the family surname stands only at the end of the entry („Radomyskich”). Beneath the word „Radomyskich” runs a decorative flourish of the pen, not text.
RadomyskiWawrzyniec
T756 · share of 0.864) cz. Pacoła, Pawła i Franciszka, Mateusza, Jana, Wawrzyńca, Michała Sendka – Radomyskich po 1 dymie – dymów 6,card 1)
the same entry also names: Radomyski Pacoł, Radomyski Paweł, Radomyski Franciszek, Radomyski Mateusz, Radomyski Jan, Radomyski Michał «Sendek»7 persons on 6 hearths
Seven forenames, six hearths: the card joins „Pawła i Franciszka” with a conjunction, which gives six units of 1 hearth each. I read the first forename from the genitive „Pacoła”; I have not managed to identify or expand it — the nominative form „Pacoł” is my own reconstruction [reading uncertain]. „Sendka” beside Michał is a byname — the family surname stands only at the end of the entry („Radomyskich”). Beneath the word „Radomyskich” runs a decorative flourish of the pen, not text.
RadomyskiFranciszek«Sendek»
T753 hearths5) cz. Franciszka Radomyskiego Sęndka – dymów 3,card 1)
The byname is recorded here as „Sęndka” (with a hook), in entry 4 „Sendka”, in the heading of T75 „Sendki”, and in T89 on card 2 „Sędki” — I do not smooth over the discrepancies of spelling [reading uncertain as to ę/en]. The abbreviation „cz.” before the forename is written very cursorily [reading uncertain].
NowosielskiBor.
T752 · each 16) cz. Bor., i Mikołaja Nowosielskich po 1 dymie – 2 dymy,card 1)
the same entry also names: Nowosielski Mikołaj2 persons on 2 hearths
The first forename in abbreviation, with a stroke over the „r”: I read „Bor.” — I do not expand it. „Bar.” is also possible [reading uncertain]; with the reading „Bar.” a feminine forename (Barbara) would also come into play, which requires a decision by the owner.
NowosielskiMikołaj
T752 · each 16) cz. Bor., i Mikołaja Nowosielskich po 1 dymie – 2 dymy,card 1)
the same entry also names: Nowosielski Bor.2 persons on 2 hearths
The first forename in abbreviation, with a stroke over the „r”: I read „Bor.” — I do not expand it. „Bar.” is also possible [reading uncertain]; with the reading „Bar.” a feminine forename (Barbara) would also come into play, which requires a decision by the owner.
Jastrzębski
T753 hearths7) cz. Jastrzębskiego – dymów 3,card 1)
the card gives no forename
KrasuskiAntoni
T751 hearth8) cz. Antoniego Krasuskiego – dym 1,card 1)
MorzyTomasz
T751 hearth9) cz. Tomasza Morzy – dym 1;card 1)
The surname in the genitive „Morzy”; the card gives no nominative form, and the surname has no attestation in SLOWNIK-OKOLICY nor in nazwiska.json [reading uncertain].
BorkowskiJacek
T751 hearthT₇₅ – Radomyśl Sendki c.d. 10) cz. Jacka Borkowskiego – dym 1,card 2)
ChromińskiGrzegorz†
T751 · share of 0.50successors† deceased11) cz. sukces. Marcina i Grzegorza Chromińskich – dym 1.card 2)
the same entry also names: Chromiński Marcin †2 persons on 1 hearth
Two persons, one hearth — one holding after two deceased, „sukces.” refers to both forenames. The final letters of the word „Chromińskich” are corrected on the card, outlined a second time [reading uncertain as to the ending].
ChromińskiMarcin†
T751 · share of 0.50successors† deceased11) cz. sukces. Marcina i Grzegorza Chromińskich – dym 1.card 2)
the same entry also names: Chromiński Grzegorz †2 persons on 1 hearth
Two persons, one hearth — one holding after two deceased, „sukces.” refers to both forenames. The final letters of the word „Chromińskich” are corrected on the card, outlined a second time [reading uncertain as to the ending].
1789 T89Hearth tax register 1789
KrasuskiLudwik
T892 hearths1 manor house, 1 cottage1) cz. Ludw. Krasuskiego 1 dwór, chał. o 1 gosp., = 2 d.card 2)
The figure in „chał. o 1 gosp.” is corrected — overwritten with a thicker, darker stroke over the original pencil [reading uncertain as to the figure itself]; the result of the entry („= 2 d.”) and the total of the card („10 d.”) confirm one cottage.
RadomyskiKajetan†
T894 hearths4 manor housesuccessors† deceased2) cz. sukc. Kajet. Radomyskiego 4 dwory, = 4 d.card 2)
RadomyskiFranciszek†
T892 hearths2 manor housesuccessors† deceased3) cz. sukc. Franc. Radomyskiego 2 dwory = 2 d.card 2)
KrasuskiFeliks
T892 hearths2 manor house4) cz. Feliksa Krasuskiego z rzesc. na wsiach Okninach i Smolance *) 2 dwory = 2 d. | *) zob. Krasusze Smolanka;card 2)
„z rzesc.” [reading uncertain] — the same abbreviation as at Krasusze Łęcznowola („z rzeszczą na wsi Pogonowie”); a holding linked with the villages of Okniny and Smolanka. The asterisk cross-reference stands in a separate line at the bottom of the card: „*) zob. Krasusze Smolanka;”. In the word „Smolance” several letters are reworked.
