Home › Castle court records / Old sources › The hearth-tax registers 1775–1794 › Wólka Kamienna
Hearth Tax Registers of the Łuków Land 1775–1794
Wólka Kamienna
In the card index under the name Kamienowa Wólka. Parish of Zbuczyn, łukowski county.
Dear reader, remember that this is an AI study, that it may contain errors; treat it as indicative and verify it for yourself.
Offices: Jastrzębski Wincenty (deputy castle court officer of Łuków (wicesgerent grodzki łukowski)
Propination, inns, breweries: Jastrzębski Wincenty (brewery, inn)
More than five hearths in one hand: Jastrzębski Wincenty (16)
spellings on the cards: Kamienowa Wólka, Wolka Kamionowa, Wola Kamienna, Wola Kamiennowa, Wolka Kamienowa, Wola Kamienowa, Wola Kamieniowa, Wolka Kamiennowa
district of łukowski · parish of Zbuczyn · cards 1), 2)
a village of Jastrzębski, deputy castle court officer of Łuków (wicesgerent grodzki łukowski) [O83 (IX)]; the hereditary estate of the successors of the late Wincenty Jastrzębski, joined with holdings in the villages of Rzążew, Chromna and Lipiny — a manor house, 2 breweries, 4 inns, 9 cottages, 16 hearths in all [T89]; 12 rural hearths of the second class [T90]; in the possession for life of Rozalia Jastrzębska [T₀89]
| Year | Source | Entries | Hearths |
|---|---|---|---|
| T75 | Hearth tax register 1775 | 1 | 13 |
| T89 | Hearth tax register 1789 | 1 | 16 |
| T90 | Hearth tax register 1790 | 1 | 12 |
| T94 | Hearth tax register 1794 | 1 | 12 |
The card-index entries
Every extract for this locality in the wording of the cards, year by year. One block is one occurrence: this person, in this year. At a collective item the same card text stands beside every person named — because the card names them together and they must not be separated. The hearths given at a collective item are an equal division among those named, not a reading.
1789 T89Hearth tax register 1789
1789 T₀89List of possessors of holdings of 1789
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Wincenty †2 persons on a holding without hearths
A list of possessors for 1789 — without hearths, hence the hearths figure = null. The village stands in it as a single whole: the successors of the deceased Wincenty Jastrzębski as owners, Rozalia Jastrzębska as possessor for life („w pos. dożyw.” = w posesji dożywotniej, in possession for life). Rozalia's family name [reading uncertain] — see the note beside the person.
A woman: the surname stands on the card in the feminine form („Jastrzębskiej”), the forename in full („Rozalii”). The card also gives her family name in the formula „z …kich”; the ending is legible with certainty, the beginning is not — I read „z Burokickich” [reading uncertain], because after „Buro” stands a letter with a tall loop crossed by a bar (the shape of an „ł” or a „t”) which I cannot resolve. I do not expand it into any known surname and do not record it in the the surname field.
the same entry also names: Jastrzębska Rozalia2 persons on a holding without hearths
A list of possessors for 1789 — without hearths, hence the hearths figure = null. The village stands in it as a single whole: the successors of the deceased Wincenty Jastrzębski as owners, Rozalia Jastrzębska as possessor for life („w pos. dożyw.” = w posesji dożywotniej, in possession for life). Rozalia's family name [reading uncertain] — see the note beside the person.
1790 T90Hearth tax register 1790
One item for the whole village, the numbering „1” editorial — the village is not divided into holdings. The entry is written in blue ink, unlike the rest of the card. The figure „12” is underlined. The formula „dymów wiejskich 2giej klasy” runs just as it does at Gozd (card 1), Annonin (card), Lipniaki (card 1) and the grange of Kij (card). The hereditary owner is not a person but the successors of the deceased Wincenty Jastrzębski — hence the mark for a deceased person = true.
1794 T94Hearth tax register 1794
One item for the whole village, the numbering „1” editorial. The figure „12” is underlined with a wavy stroke and agrees with T90. The abbreviated forename „W.” I DO NOT EXPAND: „W[incenty]” would suggest itself, but in 1789 and 1790 Wincenty Jastrzębski is already called deceased on these same cards („sukcesorów niegdyś Wincentego”, „dziedz. sukces. Wincentego”), so in the register of 1794 someone else of that family most probably stands under „W.” [I do not decide]. The card gives neither an office nor any mention of successors — unlike T89 and T90.
This locality in the full edition of the hearth-tax registers — together with a search across all persons, a modern map, Perthées’s engraving of 1786 and a statistical summary.
