Home › Castle court records / Old sources › The hearth-tax registers 1775–1794 › Koziestany
Hearth Tax Registers of the Łuków Land 1775–1794
Koziestany
Parish of Zbuczyn, łukowski county.
Dear reader, remember that this is an AI study, that it may contain errors; treat it as indicative and verify it for yourself.
Offices: Jasiński Franciszek Xawery (swordbearer of Łuków (miecznik łukowski)
spellings on the cards: Koziestany, Kozistany, Kozie Stany, Koliestany, Kozzestany
district of łukowski · parish of Zbuczyn · cards 1), 2), 3), 4)
Koziestany – noble holdings [O83 (IX)]
| Year | Source | Entries | Hearths |
|---|---|---|---|
| T75 | Hearth tax register 1775 | 6 | 10 |
| T89 | Hearth tax register 1789 | 3 | 10 |
| T90 | Hearth tax register 1790 | 2 | 10 |
| T94 | Hearth tax register 1794 | 2 | 10 |
Caveats on the years' registers (5)
What the compiler noted beside the entry itself, and what the table above does not show:
- T75 — The entry in two columns: items 1–4 in the left, items 5–6 in the right. At the foot of the left column stands a line struck out in its entirety: „1 dymie : 4 dymy.” — the copyist began there to write the formula of a collective item, cancelled it and repeated it in the right-hand column, under item 6. The writing is cancelled and does not enter the total.
- T89 — The entry closed with a summing-up of its own: „Razem 10 d.”, and after it the cross-reference „– zob. Dziewule;”. The hearths are given here as manor houses („po 1 dw.”, „1 dwór”), without being set out as any other buildings.
- T₀89 — One entry spread over two cards: it begins on card 3) (item 1), and on card 4) it continues, which the copyist marked with the abbreviation „c.d.” in the left margin (items 2–12). A list of possessors of holdings from 1789 — without hearths, so the hearths figure is empty in all the items. On card 4) items 3–12 are taken in by one great brace: below the first line runs a horizontal stroke which at its right-hand end turns downwards and with a long vertical takes in the ten following lines, and along that vertical „nie wysiewają 10 korcy” has been added vertically.
- T90 — The entry closed with a summing-up of its own: „Razem – 10 dymów wiejskich 2giej klasy;–”. The classification „dymy wiejskie 2giej klasy” is given once beside item A; beside item B it is repeated with five repetition marks („ „ „ „ „).
- T94 — The entry closed with a summing-up of its own: „Razem 10 dymów;”. The same set of persons as in T90 on the same card, in a different order.
The card-index entries
Every extract for this locality in the wording of the cards, year by year. One block is one occurrence: this person, in this year. At a collective item the same card text stands beside every person named — because the card names them together and they must not be separated. The hearths given at a collective item are an equal division among those named, not a reading.
1775 T75Hearth tax register 1775
A surname taken from a place, formed from the name of this very village. In the writing a small correction by the copyist can be seen at the syllable „zie”.
„cz. druga” — a second holding of the same Piotr Koziestański, entered separately; the card counts it as a distinct item.
the same entry also names: Dziewulski Wawrzyniec, Dziewulski Mateusz, Dziewulski Jan4 persons on 4 hearths
the same entry also names: Dziewulski Wawrzyniec, Dziewulski Antoni, Dziewulski Mateusz4 persons on 4 hearths
the same entry also names: Dziewulski Wawrzyniec, Dziewulski Antoni, Dziewulski Jan4 persons on 4 hearths
the same entry also names: Dziewulski Antoni, Dziewulski Mateusz, Dziewulski Jan4 persons on 4 hearths
1789 T89Hearth tax register 1789
the same entry also names: Koziestański Szymon, Koziestański Piotr, Koziestański Marcin †4 persons on 4 hearths
The composition of this four-person holding is identical in all three rolls — T89, T90 and T94 all name Fabian, Szymon, Piotr and the successors of Marcin Koziestański, one hearth each.
the same entry also names: Koziestański Fabian, Koziestański Szymon, Koziestański Piotr4 persons on 4 hearths
The composition of this four-person holding is identical in all three rolls — T89, T90 and T94 all name Fabian, Szymon, Piotr and the successors of Marcin Koziestański, one hearth each.
the same entry also names: Koziestański Fabian, Koziestański Szymon, Koziestański Marcin †4 persons on 4 hearths
The composition of this four-person holding is identical in all three rolls — T89, T90 and T94 all name Fabian, Szymon, Piotr and the successors of Marcin Koziestański, one hearth each.
the same entry also names: Koziestański Fabian, Koziestański Piotr, Koziestański Marcin †4 persons on 4 hearths
The composition of this four-person holding is identical in all three rolls — T89, T90 and T94 all name Fabian, Szymon, Piotr and the successors of Marcin Koziestański, one hearth each.
the same entry also names: Dziewulski Wawrzyniec, Dziewulski Wojciech, Dziewulski Wawrzyniec †, Dziewulski Jan †, Dziewulski Wojciech †6 persons on 5 hearths
SIX PERSONS, FIVE HEARTHS — the card explains this itself: above the words „Wawrzyńca i Jana” stands an addition in brackets, „(1 dw.)”, underlined with a brace taking in both forenames, that is, these two have one manor house between them; the remaining four items of one hearth each give 5 in all. The forename „(Wojciecha)” is added below the line, ringed round, with an arrow marking the place of insertion between „Jana” and „Dziewulskich” — an insertion by the copyist, not a separate item. AN INTERPRETATION REQUIRING THE OWNER'S DECISION: I assume that „sukc.” governs all three forenames that follow it (Wawrzyniec, Jan, Wojciech), because these are exactly the same three forenames that stand before it as living holders — their repetition in the same line would otherwise double the persons. The other possible reading („sukc.” beside Wawrzyniec alone, with Jan and Wojciech alive) gives the same number of five hearths, so the reckoning does not decide between them [the reading is certain, the parsing of the sentence is not].
the same entry also names: Dziewulski Wawrzyniec, Dziewulski Jan, Dziewulski Wojciech, Dziewulski Wawrzyniec †, Dziewulski Wojciech †6 persons on 5 hearths
SIX PERSONS, FIVE HEARTHS — the card explains this itself: above the words „Wawrzyńca i Jana” stands an addition in brackets, „(1 dw.)”, underlined with a brace taking in both forenames, that is, these two have one manor house between them; the remaining four items of one hearth each give 5 in all. The forename „(Wojciecha)” is added below the line, ringed round, with an arrow marking the place of insertion between „Jana” and „Dziewulskich” — an insertion by the copyist, not a separate item. AN INTERPRETATION REQUIRING THE OWNER'S DECISION: I assume that „sukc.” governs all three forenames that follow it (Wawrzyniec, Jan, Wojciech), because these are exactly the same three forenames that stand before it as living holders — their repetition in the same line would otherwise double the persons. The other possible reading („sukc.” beside Wawrzyniec alone, with Jan and Wojciech alive) gives the same number of five hearths, so the reckoning does not decide between them [the reading is certain, the parsing of the sentence is not].
the same entry also names: Dziewulski Jan, Dziewulski Wojciech, Dziewulski Wawrzyniec †, Dziewulski Jan †, Dziewulski Wojciech †6 persons on 5 hearths
SIX PERSONS, FIVE HEARTHS — the card explains this itself: above the words „Wawrzyńca i Jana” stands an addition in brackets, „(1 dw.)”, underlined with a brace taking in both forenames, that is, these two have one manor house between them; the remaining four items of one hearth each give 5 in all. The forename „(Wojciecha)” is added below the line, ringed round, with an arrow marking the place of insertion between „Jana” and „Dziewulskich” — an insertion by the copyist, not a separate item. AN INTERPRETATION REQUIRING THE OWNER'S DECISION: I assume that „sukc.” governs all three forenames that follow it (Wawrzyniec, Jan, Wojciech), because these are exactly the same three forenames that stand before it as living holders — their repetition in the same line would otherwise double the persons. The other possible reading („sukc.” beside Wawrzyniec alone, with Jan and Wojciech alive) gives the same number of five hearths, so the reckoning does not decide between them [the reading is certain, the parsing of the sentence is not].
the same entry also names: Dziewulski Wawrzyniec, Dziewulski Jan, Dziewulski Wojciech, Dziewulski Jan †, Dziewulski Wojciech †6 persons on 5 hearths
SIX PERSONS, FIVE HEARTHS — the card explains this itself: above the words „Wawrzyńca i Jana” stands an addition in brackets, „(1 dw.)”, underlined with a brace taking in both forenames, that is, these two have one manor house between them; the remaining four items of one hearth each give 5 in all. The forename „(Wojciecha)” is added below the line, ringed round, with an arrow marking the place of insertion between „Jana” and „Dziewulskich” — an insertion by the copyist, not a separate item. AN INTERPRETATION REQUIRING THE OWNER'S DECISION: I assume that „sukc.” governs all three forenames that follow it (Wawrzyniec, Jan, Wojciech), because these are exactly the same three forenames that stand before it as living holders — their repetition in the same line would otherwise double the persons. The other possible reading („sukc.” beside Wawrzyniec alone, with Jan and Wojciech alive) gives the same number of five hearths, so the reckoning does not decide between them [the reading is certain, the parsing of the sentence is not].
the same entry also names: Dziewulski Wawrzyniec, Dziewulski Jan, Dziewulski Wojciech, Dziewulski Wawrzyniec †, Dziewulski Jan †6 persons on 5 hearths
SIX PERSONS, FIVE HEARTHS — the card explains this itself: above the words „Wawrzyńca i Jana” stands an addition in brackets, „(1 dw.)”, underlined with a brace taking in both forenames, that is, these two have one manor house between them; the remaining four items of one hearth each give 5 in all. The forename „(Wojciecha)” is added below the line, ringed round, with an arrow marking the place of insertion between „Jana” and „Dziewulskich” — an insertion by the copyist, not a separate item. AN INTERPRETATION REQUIRING THE OWNER'S DECISION: I assume that „sukc.” governs all three forenames that follow it (Wawrzyniec, Jan, Wojciech), because these are exactly the same three forenames that stand before it as living holders — their repetition in the same line would otherwise double the persons. The other possible reading („sukc.” beside Wawrzyniec alone, with Jan and Wojciech alive) gives the same number of five hearths, so the reckoning does not decide between them [the reading is certain, the parsing of the sentence is not].
the same entry also names: Dziewulski Wawrzyniec, Dziewulski Jan, Dziewulski Wawrzyniec †, Dziewulski Jan †, Dziewulski Wojciech †6 persons on 5 hearths
SIX PERSONS, FIVE HEARTHS — the card explains this itself: above the words „Wawrzyńca i Jana” stands an addition in brackets, „(1 dw.)”, underlined with a brace taking in both forenames, that is, these two have one manor house between them; the remaining four items of one hearth each give 5 in all. The forename „(Wojciecha)” is added below the line, ringed round, with an arrow marking the place of insertion between „Jana” and „Dziewulskich” — an insertion by the copyist, not a separate item. AN INTERPRETATION REQUIRING THE OWNER'S DECISION: I assume that „sukc.” governs all three forenames that follow it (Wawrzyniec, Jan, Wojciech), because these are exactly the same three forenames that stand before it as living holders — their repetition in the same line would otherwise double the persons. The other possible reading („sukc.” beside Wawrzyniec alone, with Jan and Wojciech alive) gives the same number of five hearths, so the reckoning does not decide between them [the reading is certain, the parsing of the sentence is not].
The same person as in T75 (card 1), item 5), but T89 does not repeat the word „wdowy”, so I leave the status empty — I record only as much as this card says.
1789 T₀89List of possessors of holdings of 1789
The card writes the forename „Xawerego”, which I expand as Ksawery. The surname on this card runs „Jasieńskiego” (with „ie”), and on card 1) in T75 — „Jasinskiego”; I record each as it stands on its own card and do not merge the two persons [to be resolved whether this is the same family]. The abbreviation „miecz.” I expand as miecznik, swordbearer. The line closes with the cross-reference „– zob. Dziewule.”
The only woman in this list, and the same who in T75 (card 1) appears as „Katarzyny Borkowskiey wdowy”, and in T89 (card 3) as „Katarzyny Borkowskiey”. Here the surname is in the feminine form „Borkowskiej”, without any statement of her condition — I leave the status empty.
The second Wojciech Dziewulski in the same list (items 8 and 12); the card distinguishes them by nothing — neither by a byname nor by a father's forename. The last item taken in by the brace.
The first item of card 4), written in the same line as the sigla and the name of the village. OUTSIDE THE BRACE: the horizontal stroke of the brace runs BELOW this line and only beyond it turns downwards, so the annotation „nie wysiewają 10 korcy” does not cover this item [a decision on the shape of the brace — checked at eightfold magnification at the corner: the horizontal stroke and the vertical one are a single continuous line; the reading in which the stroke would be merely an underlining of the heading, and the brace would take in this line as well, I hold to be less probable, but not excluded — TO BE CONFIRMED ON THE ORIGINAL].
The first item taken in by the brace with the vertical addition „nie wysiewają 10 korcy” (items 3–12).
This card writes the forename „Wawrzeńca” (the diacritic over the „n” is visible), and cards 2) and 282 — „Wawrzyńca”; I record the nominative in accordance with this card („Wawrzeniec”) and do not harmonise it with the other years.
Antoni appears here with the surname KOZIESTAŃSKI; in T75 on card 1) (item 6) Antoni figures among the Dziewulskis. These are two different entries from different years and I do not merge the persons.
1790 T90Hearth tax register 1790
the same entry also names: Koziestański Piotr, Koziestański Szymon, Koziestański Marcin †4 persons on 4 hearths
The second forename in the enumeration the copyist first blotted out with a thick deletion, and above it added the ending „iotra”; beneath the deletion the original „P” can be seen, so it reads „Piotra”. T94 on this same card confirms it, where the same item runs „Fabjana, Piotra, sukcesorów Marcina, Szymona”. Four persons, four hearths — the reckoning agrees.
the same entry also names: Koziestański Fabian, Koziestański Piotr, Koziestański Szymon4 persons on 4 hearths
The second forename in the enumeration the copyist first blotted out with a thick deletion, and above it added the ending „iotra”; beneath the deletion the original „P” can be seen, so it reads „Piotra”. T94 on this same card confirms it, where the same item runs „Fabjana, Piotra, sukcesorów Marcina, Szymona”. Four persons, four hearths — the reckoning agrees.
the same entry also names: Koziestański Fabian, Koziestański Szymon, Koziestański Marcin †4 persons on 4 hearths
The second forename in the enumeration the copyist first blotted out with a thick deletion, and above it added the ending „iotra”; beneath the deletion the original „P” can be seen, so it reads „Piotra”. T94 on this same card confirms it, where the same item runs „Fabjana, Piotra, sukcesorów Marcina, Szymona”. Four persons, four hearths — the reckoning agrees.
the same entry also names: Koziestański Fabian, Koziestański Piotr, Koziestański Marcin †4 persons on 4 hearths
The second forename in the enumeration the copyist first blotted out with a thick deletion, and above it added the ending „iotra”; beneath the deletion the original „P” can be seen, so it reads „Piotra”. T94 on this same card confirms it, where the same item runs „Fabjana, Piotra, sukcesorów Marcina, Szymona”. Four persons, four hearths — the reckoning agrees.
the same entry also names: Dziewulski Krzysztof, Dziewulski Wawrzyniec, Dziewulski Wojciech «Wiecher», Dziewulski Wojciech, Dziewulski Wojciech †6 persons on 6 hearths
Six persons, six hearths. The three men named Wojciech are distinguished in the wording itself: the first by a byname („Wojciecha Wiechra”), the second by his father („Wojciecha syna Antoniego” — this is probably the son of Antoni Dziewulski from T75, item 6), the third is already deceased („sukces. Wojciecha”). The card gives the byname in the genitive („Wiechra”); the nominative „Wiecher” is a resolution of the form, not a reading [the nominative is uncertain]. Antoni I do not enter as a separate person — he is not the holder of a holding, he stands only as the designation of a father.
the same entry also names: Dziewulski Jan, Dziewulski Wawrzyniec, Dziewulski Wojciech «Wiecher», Dziewulski Wojciech, Dziewulski Wojciech †6 persons on 6 hearths
Six persons, six hearths. The three men named Wojciech are distinguished in the wording itself: the first by a byname („Wojciecha Wiechra”), the second by his father („Wojciecha syna Antoniego” — this is probably the son of Antoni Dziewulski from T75, item 6), the third is already deceased („sukces. Wojciecha”). The card gives the byname in the genitive („Wiechra”); the nominative „Wiecher” is a resolution of the form, not a reading [the nominative is uncertain]. Antoni I do not enter as a separate person — he is not the holder of a holding, he stands only as the designation of a father.
the same entry also names: Dziewulski Jan, Dziewulski Krzysztof, Dziewulski Wojciech «Wiecher», Dziewulski Wojciech, Dziewulski Wojciech †6 persons on 6 hearths
Six persons, six hearths. The three men named Wojciech are distinguished in the wording itself: the first by a byname („Wojciecha Wiechra”), the second by his father („Wojciecha syna Antoniego” — this is probably the son of Antoni Dziewulski from T75, item 6), the third is already deceased („sukces. Wojciecha”). The card gives the byname in the genitive („Wiechra”); the nominative „Wiecher” is a resolution of the form, not a reading [the nominative is uncertain]. Antoni I do not enter as a separate person — he is not the holder of a holding, he stands only as the designation of a father.
the same entry also names: Dziewulski Jan, Dziewulski Krzysztof, Dziewulski Wawrzyniec, Dziewulski Wojciech «Wiecher», Dziewulski Wojciech6 persons on 6 hearths
Six persons, six hearths. The three men named Wojciech are distinguished in the wording itself: the first by a byname („Wojciecha Wiechra”), the second by his father („Wojciecha syna Antoniego” — this is probably the son of Antoni Dziewulski from T75, item 6), the third is already deceased („sukces. Wojciecha”). The card gives the byname in the genitive („Wiechra”); the nominative „Wiecher” is a resolution of the form, not a reading [the nominative is uncertain]. Antoni I do not enter as a separate person — he is not the holder of a holding, he stands only as the designation of a father.
the same entry also names: Dziewulski Jan, Dziewulski Krzysztof, Dziewulski Wawrzyniec, Dziewulski Wojciech, Dziewulski Wojciech †6 persons on 6 hearths
Six persons, six hearths. The three men named Wojciech are distinguished in the wording itself: the first by a byname („Wojciecha Wiechra”), the second by his father („Wojciecha syna Antoniego” — this is probably the son of Antoni Dziewulski from T75, item 6), the third is already deceased („sukces. Wojciecha”). The card gives the byname in the genitive („Wiechra”); the nominative „Wiecher” is a resolution of the form, not a reading [the nominative is uncertain]. Antoni I do not enter as a separate person — he is not the holder of a holding, he stands only as the designation of a father.
the same entry also names: Dziewulski Jan, Dziewulski Krzysztof, Dziewulski Wawrzyniec, Dziewulski Wojciech «Wiecher», Dziewulski Wojciech †6 persons on 6 hearths
Six persons, six hearths. The three men named Wojciech are distinguished in the wording itself: the first by a byname („Wojciecha Wiechra”), the second by his father („Wojciecha syna Antoniego” — this is probably the son of Antoni Dziewulski from T75, item 6), the third is already deceased („sukces. Wojciecha”). The card gives the byname in the genitive („Wiechra”); the nominative „Wiecher” is a resolution of the form, not a reading [the nominative is uncertain]. Antoni I do not enter as a separate person — he is not the holder of a holding, he stands only as the designation of a father.
1794 T94Hearth tax register 1794
the same entry also names: Koziestański Piotr, Koziestański Marcin †, Koziestański Szymon4 persons on 4 hearths
The forename of the first person the card writes here „Fabjana”, and in T90 above „Fabiana” — the same person, two spellings.
the same entry also names: Koziestański Fabian, Koziestański Piotr, Koziestański Szymon4 persons on 4 hearths
The forename of the first person the card writes here „Fabjana”, and in T90 above „Fabiana” — the same person, two spellings.
the same entry also names: Koziestański Fabian, Koziestański Marcin †, Koziestański Szymon4 persons on 4 hearths
The forename of the first person the card writes here „Fabjana”, and in T90 above „Fabiana” — the same person, two spellings.
the same entry also names: Koziestański Fabian, Koziestański Piotr, Koziestański Marcin †4 persons on 4 hearths
The forename of the first person the card writes here „Fabjana”, and in T90 above „Fabiana” — the same person, two spellings.
the same entry also names: Dziewulski Wawrzyniec, Dziewulski Krzysztof, Dziewulski Wojciech †, Dziewulski Wojciech «Wiecher», Dziewulski Wojciech6 persons on 6 hearths
Six persons, six hearths. „Sukcesorów” refers only to the first of the men named Wojciech — T90 arranges it in the same way on this same card („sukces. Wojciecha” at the end of the enumeration). The last of them, in T90 „Wojciecha syna Antoniego”, is here called „Wojciecha po Antonim”; the phrase „po Antonim” I do not treat as evidence of Antoni's death, because the parallel wording of T90 says simply „syna Antoniego”, and Antoni himself does not appear in the entry as the holder of a holding.
the same entry also names: Dziewulski Wawrzyniec, Dziewulski Wojciech †, Dziewulski Jan, Dziewulski Wojciech «Wiecher», Dziewulski Wojciech6 persons on 6 hearths
Six persons, six hearths. „Sukcesorów” refers only to the first of the men named Wojciech — T90 arranges it in the same way on this same card („sukces. Wojciecha” at the end of the enumeration). The last of them, in T90 „Wojciecha syna Antoniego”, is here called „Wojciecha po Antonim”; the phrase „po Antonim” I do not treat as evidence of Antoni's death, because the parallel wording of T90 says simply „syna Antoniego”, and Antoni himself does not appear in the entry as the holder of a holding.
the same entry also names: Dziewulski Krzysztof, Dziewulski Wojciech †, Dziewulski Jan, Dziewulski Wojciech «Wiecher», Dziewulski Wojciech6 persons on 6 hearths
Six persons, six hearths. „Sukcesorów” refers only to the first of the men named Wojciech — T90 arranges it in the same way on this same card („sukces. Wojciecha” at the end of the enumeration). The last of them, in T90 „Wojciecha syna Antoniego”, is here called „Wojciecha po Antonim”; the phrase „po Antonim” I do not treat as evidence of Antoni's death, because the parallel wording of T90 says simply „syna Antoniego”, and Antoni himself does not appear in the entry as the holder of a holding.
the same entry also names: Dziewulski Wawrzyniec, Dziewulski Krzysztof, Dziewulski Jan, Dziewulski Wojciech «Wiecher», Dziewulski Wojciech6 persons on 6 hearths
Six persons, six hearths. „Sukcesorów” refers only to the first of the men named Wojciech — T90 arranges it in the same way on this same card („sukces. Wojciecha” at the end of the enumeration). The last of them, in T90 „Wojciecha syna Antoniego”, is here called „Wojciecha po Antonim”; the phrase „po Antonim” I do not treat as evidence of Antoni's death, because the parallel wording of T90 says simply „syna Antoniego”, and Antoni himself does not appear in the entry as the holder of a holding.
the same entry also names: Dziewulski Wawrzyniec, Dziewulski Krzysztof, Dziewulski Wojciech †, Dziewulski Jan, Dziewulski Wojciech6 persons on 6 hearths
Six persons, six hearths. „Sukcesorów” refers only to the first of the men named Wojciech — T90 arranges it in the same way on this same card („sukces. Wojciecha” at the end of the enumeration). The last of them, in T90 „Wojciecha syna Antoniego”, is here called „Wojciecha po Antonim”; the phrase „po Antonim” I do not treat as evidence of Antoni's death, because the parallel wording of T90 says simply „syna Antoniego”, and Antoni himself does not appear in the entry as the holder of a holding.
the same entry also names: Dziewulski Wawrzyniec, Dziewulski Krzysztof, Dziewulski Wojciech †, Dziewulski Jan, Dziewulski Wojciech «Wiecher»6 persons on 6 hearths
Six persons, six hearths. „Sukcesorów” refers only to the first of the men named Wojciech — T90 arranges it in the same way on this same card („sukces. Wojciecha” at the end of the enumeration). The last of them, in T90 „Wojciecha syna Antoniego”, is here called „Wojciecha po Antonim”; the phrase „po Antonim” I do not treat as evidence of Antoni's death, because the parallel wording of T90 says simply „syna Antoniego”, and Antoni himself does not appear in the entry as the holder of a holding.
This locality in the full edition of the hearth-tax registers — together with a search across all persons, a modern map, Perthées’s engraving of 1786 and a statistical summary.
