Parish of Zbuczyn, łukowski county.
Offices: Kuczyński (deputy cupbearer of Mielnik (podczaszy mielnicki) · wife of the chamberlain of the Drohiczyn Land (podkomorzyna ziemi drohickiej))
More than five hearths in one hand: Kuczyński (48)
Extracts from outside the registers
Records under sigla which the card index does not expand. They give no hearths, so they enter no total.
Sł. G.Sł. G. - Krzymosze z przydomkiem Bayki. -
note: A one-line note on the form of the name, without hearths and without persons — the same type of record as „MP”, „Top.”, „Held.” or „P.” on other cards, and so it does not enter the reckoning of hearths. The first part of the siglum I read as „Sł.” (a letter whose ascender has a loop crossed by a stroke — „ł”, not „t”), the second as „G.”; together most probably Słownik Geograficzny [the reading of the expansion uncertain — the card index does not explain its sigla, and in the corpus so far „Sł. G.” does not occur once]. The content of the note matters for the name: it confirms that „Bayki” is a BYNAME of the village of Krzymosze and not a separate place — and „Krzymosze Bayki” of T94 and „Krzymosze Bayki i Ciepiele” of T90 must be read in that way too.
spellings on the cards: Krzymosze, Krzymosze Bayki, Krzymosze Bayki i Ciepiele, Krzymoszyce
district of łukowski · parish of Zbuczyn · cards 1
the hereditary village of the Kuczyńskis, with the byname Bayki, with the holding Ciepiele and with a holding in the village of Wielgorz; a windmill [O83 (IX)]; a chapel in the manor house [V48]; 48 village hearths of the 2nd class [T90]
| Year | Source | Entries | Hearths |
|---|
| T75 | Hearth tax register 1775 | 1 | 28 |
| T90 | Hearth tax register 1790 | 1 | 48 |
| T94 | Hearth tax register 1794 | 1 | 48 |
Without an extract for 1789 — no card of this village carries that tariff. It is a missing extract in the card index, not a gap in the numbering of the cards.
The card-index entries
Every extract for this locality in the wording of the cards, year by year. One block is one occurrence: this person, in this year. At a collective item the same card text stands beside every person named — because the card names them together and they must not be separated. The hearths given at a collective item are an equal division among those named, not a reading.
1790 T90Hearth tax register 1790
Kuczyńskideputy cupbearer of Mielnik (podczaszy mielnicki)wife of the chamberlain of the Drohiczyn Land (podkomorzyna ziemi drohickiej)wife of the chamberlain of Drohiczyn (podkomorzyna drohicka)
T9048 hearthshereditary ownerhereditary ownerT90 - wieś Krzymosze Bayki i Ciepiele - dziedz. Kuczyńskiego podczaszego mielnickiego z cz. na wsi Wielgorze - 48 dymów wiejskich 2giej klasy. -
One item for the whole village, the numbering „1” editorial. The card gives no forename for the hereditary owner — the surname and the office alone remain. The surname is written over a correction: the beginning of the word (after the capital „K”) is blotted with a thick pen drawn twice, the ending „-yńskiego” is legible; the reading „Kuczyńskiego” [reading uncertain as to the blotted letters] is supported by the O83 („Kuczynskiej”) and T94 („Kuczynskiego”) lines on the same card, where the surname is written cleanly. The office „podczaszego mielnickiego” (the Mielnik Land) — I checked the initial letter of the word separately: four arcs before the „e” (m + i), as in „mi drohickiej” in the O83 line, and not three with a little knot, as in „wiejskich” two lines below; „mielnicki” is also a form well attested in the corpus (the Kaliccy, the Markowscy). NOTE ON THE TOTAL: the 48 hearths cover — directly from the wording — not only Krzymosze Bayki and Ciepiele, but also „cz. na wsi Wielgorze”, that is a holding lying in another village. The figure 48 is therefore not a pure figure of the hearths of Krzymosze; the card index does not break it down, and neither do I. The figure „48” underlined.
1794 T94Hearth tax register 1794
Kuczyńskideputy cupbearer of Mielnik (podczaszy mielnicki)wife of the chamberlain of the Drohiczyn Land (podkomorzyna ziemi drohickiej)wife of the chamberlain of Drohiczyn (podkomorzyna drohicka)
T9448 hearthshereditary ownerhereditary ownerT94 - Krzymosze Bayki, wieś Kuczynskiego, dymów 48.;
One item for the whole village, the numbering „1” editorial. Here the card gives neither forename nor office — the surname alone; the office „podczaszy mielnicki” comes from T90 and I do not add it here. Over the „n” no stroke is visible, so I normalise to „Kuczyński”. The number of hearths is the same as in T90 (48), although T94 names the village more narrowly — „Krzymosze Bayki”, without Ciepiele and without the holding in the village of Wielgorze. The figure „48” underlined; after it the card sets a full stop and a semicolon.
O83 O83A description of 1783 [the expansion of the siglum to be confirmed]
Kuczyńskideputy cupbearer of Mielnik (podczaszy mielnicki)wife of the chamberlain of the Drohiczyn Land (podkomorzyna ziemi drohickiej)wife of the chamberlain of Drohiczyn (podkomorzyna drohicka)
O83hereditary ownerhereditary ownerO83 (IX) - Krzymoszyce - wieś Kuczynskiej, podkomorzyny zie-mi drohickiej; młyn wietrzny;
A WOMAN — and the only person on the whole card written in a feminine form: the surname in the feminine genitive („Kuczynskiej”), and beside it the husband-derived title „podkomorzyny ziemi drohickiej” (podkomorzyna = the wife or the widow of the chamberlain of Drohiczyn). The card gives no forename, so the given name is empty; this is not a husband-derived form standing in place of a forename, but the absence of a forename, so I leave the recorded form of the name empty as well. Over the „n” in „Kuczynskiej” I see no stroke (in the T90 line the stroke over the „ń” is there) — I normalise to „Kuczyńska”, but I record it. A DISCREPANCY BETWEEN THE YEARS WHICH I DO NOT SMOOTH OVER: O83 (1783) gives the village to a WOMAN and to the title of podkomorzyna of DROHICZYN, while T90 (1790) and T94 (1794) — to a man, T90 titling him deputy cupbearer of MIELNIK. Two different offices and two different sexes; the merging of persons is a separate, later stage, so I record both wordings as they stand. The name of the village in the form „Krzymoszyce” — the only such occurrence on the card. The word „ziemi” is carried over to the next line („zie-mi”); I write it with the hyphen as on the card. The number in brackets I read as the Roman „IX”, just as with Karcze, Ruska Wola and Krasusy Łęcznowola.
