Home › Castle court records / Old sources › The hearth-tax registers 1775–1794 › Surnames › Ługowski
Hearth Tax Registers of the Łuków Land 1775–1794
Ługowski
separate records 72 · places 12 · registers 1775, 1789, 1790, 1794
Dear reader, remember that this is an AI study, that it may contain errors; treat it as indicative and verify it for yourself.
„Separate entries for persons” means: separate entries of a given name with a surname and a byname, not persons proved to have existed. The same man recorded in four registers is one entry, but two namesakes from the same village are sometimes impossible to tell apart, and over twenty years a parcel could pass to a son of the same name. The hearths given at a collective entry are an equal division among those named — a calculation, not a reading.
| Year | Source | Entries | Persons | Hearths |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1775 | Hearth tax register 1775 | 27 | 27 | 32,0 |
| 1789 | Hearth tax register 1789 | 36 | 36 | 32,9 |
| 1789 | List of possessors of holdings of 1789 | 36 | 32 | — |
| 1790 | Hearth tax register 1790 | 34 | 34 | 30,9 |
| 1794 | Hearth tax register 1794 | 34 | 34 | 32,1 |
The year 1789 stands twice in the table, and rightly so: these are two different sources. The register gives the hearths, the list of parcel-holders does not — which is why the list carries a dash and not a zero, and the hearths of 1789 are not counted twice.
Where the surname occurs
The localities in which the card file records this surname, with the number of entries and of the hearths falling to it in each village.
- Borki-KosiorkiZbuczynrecords 1
- Borki-WyrkiZbuczynrecords 1 · hearths 2,0
- BzówZbuczynrecords 2 · hearths 1,0
- ChojaZbuczynrecords 6 · hearths 5,0
- DziewuleZbuczynrecords 4 · hearths 3,0
- GołaczeZbuczynrecords 33 · hearths 21,0
- Ługi-RętkiZbuczynrecords 29 · hearths 28,0
- Ługi WielkieZbuczynrecords 76 · hearths 55,6
- OlędyZbuczynrecords 1
- RadomyślZbuczynrecords 1 · hearths 1,0
- RzązewZbuczynrecords 8 · hearths 7,3
- ZdanyZbuczynrecords 5 · hearths 4,0
bynames used with this surname Kępia Krolik Panoszek Wyszek
The card-index entries
All the extracts for this surname in the wording of the cards. One block is one occurrence: this person, in this register. In a collective entry the same text of the card stands beside every person named — because the card names them together, and they must not be separated.
Borki-KosiorkiZbuczyn parish
Borki-WyrkiZbuczyn parish
A woman. The card gives a forename of her own in the genitive „Zofji” (the nominative does not occur on the card) and a surname in the feminine form „Ługowskiey”. The surname Ługowski/Ługowska is attested in the neighbourhood.
BzówZbuczyn parish
the same entry also names: Radzikowska Agn[ieszka]2 persons on a holding without hearths
„taż Agn. Radzikowska” — the same Agnieszka Radzikowska as in entry 14 took the oath for this holding; she is not the possessor of this holding. Antoni Ługowski has a holding of his own in T75 entry 11 (card 1), there still in his lifetime.
ChojaZbuczyn parish
the same entry also names: Ługowski Wojciech2 persons on 2 hearths
„syna Antoniego” — the father's forename entered after a correction: on the card „An-” was left, the further course of the word struck out, and above it „toniego” written in. The father I do not record as a separate person — the card names him only to distinguish the two Wojciechs.
the same entry also names: Ługowski Wojciech2 persons on 2 hearths
„syna Stanisława” (son of Stanisław) — the father's forename serves to distinguish him from the preceding Wojciech; I do not enter the father as a separate person.
the same entry also names: Ługowski Wojciech2 persons on 2 hearths
the same entry also names: Ługowski Wojciech2 persons on 2 hearths
„Wojciecha po Stanisławie” — the second Wojciech, distinguished by his father's forename; I do not enter the father as a separate person. In T90 on card 2 (card 2) the same pair: „Wojciecha syna An[toniego] i Wojciecha syna Stanisława Ługowskich”.
DziewuleZbuczyn parish
The marks of repetition („) refer to the formula of entry A: „dymów wiejskich 2giej klasy”.
GołaczeZbuczyn parish
the same entry also names: Ługowski, Ługowski Walenty, Ługowski Aleksander, Ługowski Mateusz5 persons on 5 hearths
The card names the first two persons solely by a husband-derived form („Ludwikowej”, „Maciejowej”) — it gives no forenames of their own; the surname stands once, in the masculine plural („Ługowskich”), so I enter it for both women in this form. Five persons, five hearths — in agreement with the card's own total „Razem dymów 5”.
the same entry also names: Ługowski, Ługowski Walenty, Ługowski Aleksander, Ługowski Mateusz5 persons on 5 hearths
The card names the first two persons solely by a husband-derived form („Ludwikowej”, „Maciejowej”) — it gives no forenames of their own; the surname stands once, in the masculine plural („Ługowskich”), so I enter it for both women in this form. Five persons, five hearths — in agreement with the card's own total „Razem dymów 5”.
the same entry also names: Ługowski, Ługowski, Ługowski Walenty, Ługowski Mateusz5 persons on 5 hearths
The card names the first two persons solely by a husband-derived form („Ludwikowej”, „Maciejowej”) — it gives no forenames of their own; the surname stands once, in the masculine plural („Ługowskich”), so I enter it for both women in this form. Five persons, five hearths — in agreement with the card's own total „Razem dymów 5”.
the same entry also names: Ługowski, Ługowski, Ługowski Walenty, Ługowski Aleksander5 persons on 5 hearths
The card names the first two persons solely by a husband-derived form („Ludwikowej”, „Maciejowej”) — it gives no forenames of their own; the surname stands once, in the masculine plural („Ługowskich”), so I enter it for both women in this form. Five persons, five hearths — in agreement with the card's own total „Razem dymów 5”.
the same entry also names: Ługowski, Ługowski, Ługowski Aleksander, Ługowski Mateusz5 persons on 5 hearths
The card names the first two persons solely by a husband-derived form („Ludwikowej”, „Maciejowej”) — it gives no forenames of their own; the surname stands once, in the masculine plural („Ługowskich”), so I enter it for both women in this form. Five persons, five hearths — in agreement with the card's own total „Razem dymów 5”.
the same entry also names: Ługowski Sebestjan, Ługowski Piotr, Ługowski Józef, Ługowski Michał, Ługowski Krzysztof6 persons on 6 hearths
Six persons, six hearths. With entry 1 this gives the card's own total „Razem 7 d.”.
the same entry also names: Ługowski Sebestjan, Ługowski Jan, Ługowski Piotr, Ługowski Michał, Ługowski Krzysztof6 persons on 6 hearths
Six persons, six hearths. With entry 1 this gives the card's own total „Razem 7 d.”.
the same entry also names: Ługowski Sebestjan, Ługowski Jan, Ługowski Piotr, Ługowski Józef, Ługowski Michał6 persons on 6 hearths
Six persons, six hearths. With entry 1 this gives the card's own total „Razem 7 d.”.
the same entry also names: Ługowski Sebestjan, Ługowski Jan, Ługowski Piotr, Ługowski Józef, Ługowski Krzysztof6 persons on 6 hearths
Six persons, six hearths. With entry 1 this gives the card's own total „Razem 7 d.”.
the same entry also names: Ługowski Sebestjan, Ługowski Jan, Ługowski Józef, Ługowski Michał, Ługowski Krzysztof6 persons on 6 hearths
Six persons, six hearths. With entry 1 this gives the card's own total „Razem 7 d.”.
the same entry also names: Ługowski Jan, Ługowski Piotr, Ługowski Józef, Ługowski Michał, Ługowski Krzysztof6 persons on 6 hearths
Six persons, six hearths. With entry 1 this gives the card's own total „Razem 7 d.”.
A holding lying on two villages at once. The same holding is recorded at Ługi Rędki (card 3): „T₀89 – cz. na Rędkach Kazimierza Ługowskiego . zob. Gołacze.”) — the cross-reference of that card points precisely to this one.
The first entry of the card stands in the heading line, after the name of the village.
the same entry also names: Lipiński W[ojciech]2 persons on a holding without hearths
The abbreviation „ssrów” = s[ukce]s[o]rów, of the successors, with an abbreviation stroke over the second „s” — just as on the other cards of T₀89 in this card index. The possessors are the successors of Alexy Ługowski; W[ojciech] Lipiński only swore the declaration (fasja) — this is the „tenże” of entry 5.
Below this line the card draws a horizontal stroke, which separates this group from the last three lines of the left-hand column. The name „Jan Ługowski” occurs on the card for a second time (entry 2) — two separate lines, I do not merge the two.
the same entry also names: Ługowski Michał, Ługowski Piotr, Ługowski Sebestjan, Ługowski Walenty †5 persons on 5 hearths
The line begins with a blotted/struck-through sign before „cz.” [reading uncertain] — it looks like a struck-out letter, not an abbreviation. I do not record Mateusz (father of Sebestjan) as a separate person: he is not the possessor of a holding. The card's own total stands in the heading of the register, not below the list.
the same entry also names: Ługowski Józef, Ługowski Piotr, Ługowski Sebestjan, Ługowski Walenty †5 persons on 5 hearths
The line begins with a blotted/struck-through sign before „cz.” [reading uncertain] — it looks like a struck-out letter, not an abbreviation. I do not record Mateusz (father of Sebestjan) as a separate person: he is not the possessor of a holding. The card's own total stands in the heading of the register, not below the list.
the same entry also names: Ługowski Józef, Ługowski Michał, Ługowski Sebestjan, Ługowski Walenty †5 persons on 5 hearths
The line begins with a blotted/struck-through sign before „cz.” [reading uncertain] — it looks like a struck-out letter, not an abbreviation. I do not record Mateusz (father of Sebestjan) as a separate person: he is not the possessor of a holding. The card's own total stands in the heading of the register, not below the list.
the same entry also names: Ługowski Józef, Ługowski Michał, Ługowski Piotr, Ługowski Walenty †5 persons on 5 hearths
The line begins with a blotted/struck-through sign before „cz.” [reading uncertain] — it looks like a struck-out letter, not an abbreviation. I do not record Mateusz (father of Sebestjan) as a separate person: he is not the possessor of a holding. The card's own total stands in the heading of the register, not below the list.
the card describes him through his father: „syna Mateusza”
the same entry also names: Ługowski Józef, Ługowski Michał, Ługowski Piotr, Ługowski Sebestjan5 persons on 5 hearths
The line begins with a blotted/struck-through sign before „cz.” [reading uncertain] — it looks like a struck-out letter, not an abbreviation. I do not record Mateusz (father of Sebestjan) as a separate person: he is not the possessor of a holding. The card's own total stands in the heading of the register, not below the list.
the same entry also names: Ługowski Piotr, Ługowski Michał, Ługowski Sebastjan, Ługowski Walenty †5 persons on 5 hearths
Five holdings of 1 hearth each; the card's own total („5 dymów”) stands in the same line, the card adds no separate „Razem”.
the same entry also names: Ługowski Józef, Ługowski Piotr, Ługowski Sebastjan, Ługowski Walenty †5 persons on 5 hearths
Five holdings of 1 hearth each; the card's own total („5 dymów”) stands in the same line, the card adds no separate „Razem”.
the same entry also names: Ługowski Józef, Ługowski Michał, Ługowski Sebastjan, Ługowski Walenty †5 persons on 5 hearths
Five holdings of 1 hearth each; the card's own total („5 dymów”) stands in the same line, the card adds no separate „Razem”.
the same entry also names: Ługowski Józef, Ługowski Piotr, Ługowski Michał, Ługowski Walenty †5 persons on 5 hearths
Five holdings of 1 hearth each; the card's own total („5 dymów”) stands in the same line, the card adds no separate „Razem”.
the same entry also names: Ługowski Józef, Ługowski Piotr, Ługowski Michał, Ługowski Sebastjan5 persons on 5 hearths
Five holdings of 1 hearth each; the card's own total („5 dymów”) stands in the same line, the card adds no separate „Razem”.
Ługi-RętkiZbuczyn parish
the same entry also names: Ługowski Sokie, Ługowski Józef, Ługowski Stanisław, Ługowski Andrzej, Ługowski Andrzej6 persons on 6 hearths
„Ługowskich” underlined with a wavy line (the collective surname of the whole entry). „2 Andrzejów” I break out into two persons of the same forename — the card distinguishes them by nothing further. Six persons, six hearths. The first forename I read as „Sokie” [reading uncertain] — see the note at the person.
the same entry also names: Ługowski Sokie, Ługowski Józef, Ługowski Stanisław, Ługowski Andrzej, Ługowski Adam6 persons on 6 hearths
„Ługowskich” underlined with a wavy line (the collective surname of the whole entry). „2 Andrzejów” I break out into two persons of the same forename — the card distinguishes them by nothing further. Six persons, six hearths. The first forename I read as „Sokie” [reading uncertain] — see the note at the person.
the same entry also names: Ługowski Sokie, Ługowski Józef, Ługowski Stanisław, Ługowski Andrzej, Ługowski Adam6 persons on 6 hearths
„Ługowskich” underlined with a wavy line (the collective surname of the whole entry). „2 Andrzejów” I break out into two persons of the same forename — the card distinguishes them by nothing further. Six persons, six hearths. The first forename I read as „Sokie” [reading uncertain] — see the note at the person.
the same entry also names: Ługowski Sokie, Ługowski Stanisław, Ługowski Andrzej, Ługowski Andrzej, Ługowski Adam6 persons on 6 hearths
„Ługowskich” underlined with a wavy line (the collective surname of the whole entry). „2 Andrzejów” I break out into two persons of the same forename — the card distinguishes them by nothing further. Six persons, six hearths. The first forename I read as „Sokie” [reading uncertain] — see the note at the person.
the same entry also names: Ługowski Józef, Ługowski Stanisław, Ługowski Andrzej, Ługowski Andrzej, Ługowski Adam6 persons on 6 hearths
„Ługowskich” underlined with a wavy line (the collective surname of the whole entry). „2 Andrzejów” I break out into two persons of the same forename — the card distinguishes them by nothing further. Six persons, six hearths. The first forename I read as „Sokie” [reading uncertain] — see the note at the person.
the forename read literally as „Sokie” — it answers to no known Polish forename. The first letter is certainly an „S” (identical with the „S” in „Stanisława” and „Sebestjana” in the same line and in the line below), then „o”, then a „k” of a build identical with the „k” in „Rętki” (a loop + a small bowl), a dot over the „i” and a final „e”. Readings considered and rejected: „Szymona” (on card 1), T90 D, „Szymona” has an entirely different, longer shape), „Sobka”, „Sokoła” (they would require a second tall loop, which is not there), „Sukces.” (the card's arithmetic requires six persons for six hearths, so this must be a forename). I DO NOT EXPAND IT. [reading uncertain]
the same entry also names: Ługowski Sokie, Ługowski Józef, Ługowski Andrzej, Ługowski Andrzej, Ługowski Adam6 persons on 6 hearths
„Ługowskich” underlined with a wavy line (the collective surname of the whole entry). „2 Andrzejów” I break out into two persons of the same forename — the card distinguishes them by nothing further. Six persons, six hearths. The first forename I read as „Sokie” [reading uncertain] — see the note at the person.
the same entry also names: Ługowski Jan, Ługowski Kazimierz, Ługowski Andrzej, Ługowski Franciszek, Ługowski Stanisław †, Ługowski Andrzej, Ługowski Sebastjan8 persons on 8 hearths
eight persons, eight hearths. „Jana po Adamie” — the card does not say outright that Adam is dead, so I do not set the mark for a deceased person beside him (Adam Ługowski stands, in any case, as a living possessor in T90 and T94). The forename „Sebastjana” is written here with an „a”; on card 1) (T75, T90) — „Sebestjana”. A discrepancy of writing between the years.
the forename is written on the card with an „x”: „Alexego” — I transcribe it literally, I do not normalise it to „Aleksy”.
the same entry also names: Ługowski Jan, Ługowski Kazimierz, Ługowski Franciszek, Ługowski Stanisław †, Ługowski Andrzej, Ługowski Alexy †, Ługowski Sebastjan8 persons on 8 hearths
eight persons, eight hearths. „Jana po Adamie” — the card does not say outright that Adam is dead, so I do not set the mark for a deceased person beside him (Adam Ługowski stands, in any case, as a living possessor in T90 and T94). The forename „Sebastjana” is written here with an „a”; on card 1) (T75, T90) — „Sebestjana”. A discrepancy of writing between the years.
the same entry also names: Ługowski Jan, Ługowski Kazimierz, Ługowski Andrzej, Ługowski Franciszek, Ługowski Stanisław †, Ługowski Alexy †, Ługowski Sebastjan8 persons on 8 hearths
eight persons, eight hearths. „Jana po Adamie” — the card does not say outright that Adam is dead, so I do not set the mark for a deceased person beside him (Adam Ługowski stands, in any case, as a living possessor in T90 and T94). The forename „Sebastjana” is written here with an „a”; on card 1) (T75, T90) — „Sebestjana”. A discrepancy of writing between the years.
the same entry also names: Ługowski Jan, Ługowski Kazimierz, Ługowski Andrzej, Ługowski Stanisław †, Ługowski Andrzej, Ługowski Alexy †, Ługowski Sebastjan8 persons on 8 hearths
eight persons, eight hearths. „Jana po Adamie” — the card does not say outright that Adam is dead, so I do not set the mark for a deceased person beside him (Adam Ługowski stands, in any case, as a living possessor in T90 and T94). The forename „Sebastjana” is written here with an „a”; on card 1) (T75, T90) — „Sebestjana”. A discrepancy of writing between the years.
the same entry also names: Ługowski Kazimierz, Ługowski Andrzej, Ługowski Franciszek, Ługowski Stanisław †, Ługowski Andrzej, Ługowski Alexy †, Ługowski Sebastjan8 persons on 8 hearths
eight persons, eight hearths. „Jana po Adamie” — the card does not say outright that Adam is dead, so I do not set the mark for a deceased person beside him (Adam Ługowski stands, in any case, as a living possessor in T90 and T94). The forename „Sebastjana” is written here with an „a”; on card 1) (T75, T90) — „Sebestjana”. A discrepancy of writing between the years.
the same entry also names: Ługowski Jan, Ługowski Andrzej, Ługowski Franciszek, Ługowski Stanisław †, Ługowski Andrzej, Ługowski Alexy †, Ługowski Sebastjan8 persons on 8 hearths
eight persons, eight hearths. „Jana po Adamie” — the card does not say outright that Adam is dead, so I do not set the mark for a deceased person beside him (Adam Ługowski stands, in any case, as a living possessor in T90 and T94). The forename „Sebastjana” is written here with an „a”; on card 1) (T75, T90) — „Sebestjana”. A discrepancy of writing between the years.
the same entry also names: Ługowski Jan, Ługowski Kazimierz, Ługowski Andrzej, Ługowski Franciszek, Ługowski Stanisław †, Ługowski Andrzej, Ługowski Alexy †8 persons on 8 hearths
eight persons, eight hearths. „Jana po Adamie” — the card does not say outright that Adam is dead, so I do not set the mark for a deceased person beside him (Adam Ługowski stands, in any case, as a living possessor in T90 and T94). The forename „Sebastjana” is written here with an „a”; on card 1) (T75, T90) — „Sebestjana”. A discrepancy of writing between the years.
the same entry also names: Ługowski Jan, Ługowski Kazimierz, Ługowski Andrzej, Ługowski Franciszek, Ługowski Andrzej, Ługowski Alexy †, Ługowski Sebastjan8 persons on 8 hearths
eight persons, eight hearths. „Jana po Adamie” — the card does not say outright that Adam is dead, so I do not set the mark for a deceased person beside him (Adam Ługowski stands, in any case, as a living possessor in T90 and T94). The forename „Sebastjana” is written here with an „a”; on card 1) (T75, T90) — „Sebestjana”. A discrepancy of writing between the years.
The only T₀89 entry for this village. The card describes it not as a holding „w Ługach Rętkach”, but „na Rędkach” — and refers to another village: „zob. Gołacze”, which means that the possessor is taken into the list of possessors of Gołacze. Kazimierz Ługowski appears also in T89 (card 2) as the possessor of a holding in this village. The surname „Ługowskiego” is furnished above the line with a double wavy sign.
the same entry also names: Ługowski Andrzej, Ługowski Andrzej, Ługowski Franciszek, Ługowski Jan, Ługowski Krzysztof, Ługowski Sebestjan7 persons on 7 hearths
seven persons, seven hearths. „Andrzeja syna Szymona” — Szymon I do not enter as a separate entry, because he is not a possessor here; T94 (card 3) names the same person „Andrzeja po Szymonie”.
the same entry also names: Ługowski Adam, Ługowski Andrzej, Ługowski Franciszek, Ługowski Jan, Ługowski Krzysztof, Ługowski Sebestjan7 persons on 7 hearths
seven persons, seven hearths. „Andrzeja syna Szymona” — Szymon I do not enter as a separate entry, because he is not a possessor here; T94 (card 3) names the same person „Andrzeja po Szymonie”.
the same entry also names: Ługowski Adam, Ługowski Andrzej, Ługowski Franciszek, Ługowski Jan, Ługowski Krzysztof, Ługowski Sebestjan7 persons on 7 hearths
seven persons, seven hearths. „Andrzeja syna Szymona” — Szymon I do not enter as a separate entry, because he is not a possessor here; T94 (card 3) names the same person „Andrzeja po Szymonie”.
the same entry also names: Ługowski Adam, Ługowski Andrzej, Ługowski Andrzej, Ługowski Jan, Ługowski Krzysztof, Ługowski Sebestjan7 persons on 7 hearths
seven persons, seven hearths. „Andrzeja syna Szymona” — Szymon I do not enter as a separate entry, because he is not a possessor here; T94 (card 3) names the same person „Andrzeja po Szymonie”.
the same entry also names: Ługowski Adam, Ługowski Andrzej, Ługowski Andrzej, Ługowski Franciszek, Ługowski Krzysztof, Ługowski Sebestjan7 persons on 7 hearths
seven persons, seven hearths. „Andrzeja syna Szymona” — Szymon I do not enter as a separate entry, because he is not a possessor here; T94 (card 3) names the same person „Andrzeja po Szymonie”.
the same entry also names: Ługowski Adam, Ługowski Andrzej, Ługowski Andrzej, Ługowski Franciszek, Ługowski Jan, Ługowski Sebestjan7 persons on 7 hearths
seven persons, seven hearths. „Andrzeja syna Szymona” — Szymon I do not enter as a separate entry, because he is not a possessor here; T94 (card 3) names the same person „Andrzeja po Szymonie”.
the same entry also names: Ługowski Adam, Ługowski Andrzej, Ługowski Andrzej, Ługowski Franciszek, Ługowski Jan, Ługowski Krzysztof7 persons on 7 hearths
seven persons, seven hearths. „Andrzeja syna Szymona” — Szymon I do not enter as a separate entry, because he is not a possessor here; T94 (card 3) names the same person „Andrzeja po Szymonie”.
the same entry also names: Ługowski Andrzej, Ługowski Andrzej, Ługowski Krzysztof, Ługowski Jan, Ługowski Franciszek, Ługowski Sebastjan7 persons on 7 hearths
seven persons, seven hearths — the same composition as T90, entry D (card 1), only in a different order; „Andrzeja po Szymonie” answers there to „Andrzejowi synowi Szymona”. The card does not say outright that Szymon is dead, so I do not set the mark for a deceased person beside him — the card index does not, in any case, record Szymon as a possessor in this village.
the same entry also names: Ługowski Andrzej, Ługowski Adam, Ługowski Krzysztof, Ługowski Jan, Ługowski Franciszek, Ługowski Sebastjan7 persons on 7 hearths
seven persons, seven hearths — the same composition as T90, entry D (card 1), only in a different order; „Andrzeja po Szymonie” answers there to „Andrzejowi synowi Szymona”. The card does not say outright that Szymon is dead, so I do not set the mark for a deceased person beside him — the card index does not, in any case, record Szymon as a possessor in this village.
the same entry also names: Ługowski Andrzej, Ługowski Adam, Ługowski Krzysztof, Ługowski Jan, Ługowski Franciszek, Ługowski Sebastjan7 persons on 7 hearths
seven persons, seven hearths — the same composition as T90, entry D (card 1), only in a different order; „Andrzeja po Szymonie” answers there to „Andrzejowi synowi Szymona”. The card does not say outright that Szymon is dead, so I do not set the mark for a deceased person beside him — the card index does not, in any case, record Szymon as a possessor in this village.
the same entry also names: Ługowski Andrzej, Ługowski Andrzej, Ługowski Adam, Ługowski Krzysztof, Ługowski Jan, Ługowski Sebastjan7 persons on 7 hearths
seven persons, seven hearths — the same composition as T90, entry D (card 1), only in a different order; „Andrzeja po Szymonie” answers there to „Andrzejowi synowi Szymona”. The card does not say outright that Szymon is dead, so I do not set the mark for a deceased person beside him — the card index does not, in any case, record Szymon as a possessor in this village.
the same entry also names: Ługowski Andrzej, Ługowski Andrzej, Ługowski Adam, Ługowski Krzysztof, Ługowski Franciszek, Ługowski Sebastjan7 persons on 7 hearths
seven persons, seven hearths — the same composition as T90, entry D (card 1), only in a different order; „Andrzeja po Szymonie” answers there to „Andrzejowi synowi Szymona”. The card does not say outright that Szymon is dead, so I do not set the mark for a deceased person beside him — the card index does not, in any case, record Szymon as a possessor in this village.
the same entry also names: Ługowski Andrzej, Ługowski Andrzej, Ługowski Adam, Ługowski Jan, Ługowski Franciszek, Ługowski Sebastjan7 persons on 7 hearths
seven persons, seven hearths — the same composition as T90, entry D (card 1), only in a different order; „Andrzeja po Szymonie” answers there to „Andrzejowi synowi Szymona”. The card does not say outright that Szymon is dead, so I do not set the mark for a deceased person beside him — the card index does not, in any case, record Szymon as a possessor in this village.
the same entry also names: Ługowski Andrzej, Ługowski Andrzej, Ługowski Adam, Ługowski Krzysztof, Ługowski Jan, Ługowski Franciszek7 persons on 7 hearths
seven persons, seven hearths — the same composition as T90, entry D (card 1), only in a different order; „Andrzeja po Szymonie” answers there to „Andrzejowi synowi Szymona”. The card does not say outright that Szymon is dead, so I do not set the mark for a deceased person beside him — the card index does not, in any case, record Szymon as a possessor in this village.
Ługi WielkieZbuczyn parish
the same entry also names: Ługowski Maciej «Krolik», Ługowski Stanisław «Krolik», Ługowski Antoni «Kępia», Ługowski Marcin «Wyszek», Ługowski Andrzej «Wyszek», Ługowski Leonard «Kępia», Ługowski Łukasz «Wyszek», Ługowski Jan «Panoszek», Ługowski Szymon «Panoszek»10 persons on 10 hearths
A collective entry: the surname „Ługowskich” stands once, at the end, and beside each person stands a byname. „Bart. Krolika” is STRUCK OUT on the card and does not enter the ten persons — the same Bartłomiej has an entry of his own, 2 (3 hearths); I do not count the struck-out name in, so as not to count him twice. Without him it comes to exactly 10 persons on 10 hearths. Above „Panoszka” stands a superscript „2” — I read it as a sign that the byname refers to both of the preceding forenames (Jan and Szymon) [reading uncertain]. The spelling of the byname Wyszek differs three times over on this one card: „Wyzka” (Marcin), „Wyszków” (the 2 Andrzejs), „Wyżka” with a dot over the z (Łukasz) — I do not smooth it out; in the text of the extract it stands as it does on the card. The nominatives of the bynames „Wyszek” and „Panoszek” are a reconstruction from the genitive, the card gives only oblique forms [reading uncertain]; the byname „Kępia” I leave in the form from the card, because the nominative cannot be restored unambiguously (Kęp? Kępa?).
the same entry also names: Ługowski Maciej «Krolik», Ługowski Stanisław «Krolik», Ługowski Antoni «Kępia», Ługowski Marcin «Wyszek», Ługowski Andrzej «Wyszek», Ługowski Leonard «Kępia», Ługowski Łukasz «Wyszek», Ługowski Jan «Panoszek», Ługowski Szymon «Panoszek»10 persons on 10 hearths
A collective entry: the surname „Ługowskich” stands once, at the end, and beside each person stands a byname. „Bart. Krolika” is STRUCK OUT on the card and does not enter the ten persons — the same Bartłomiej has an entry of his own, 2 (3 hearths); I do not count the struck-out name in, so as not to count him twice. Without him it comes to exactly 10 persons on 10 hearths. Above „Panoszka” stands a superscript „2” — I read it as a sign that the byname refers to both of the preceding forenames (Jan and Szymon) [reading uncertain]. The spelling of the byname Wyszek differs three times over on this one card: „Wyzka” (Marcin), „Wyszków” (the 2 Andrzejs), „Wyżka” with a dot over the z (Łukasz) — I do not smooth it out; in the text of the extract it stands as it does on the card. The nominatives of the bynames „Wyszek” and „Panoszek” are a reconstruction from the genitive, the card gives only oblique forms [reading uncertain]; the byname „Kępia” I leave in the form from the card, because the nominative cannot be restored unambiguously (Kęp? Kępa?).
the same entry also names: Ługowski Maciej «Krolik», Ługowski Stanisław «Krolik», Ługowski Marcin «Wyszek», Ługowski Andrzej «Wyszek», Ługowski Andrzej «Wyszek», Ługowski Leonard «Kępia», Ługowski Łukasz «Wyszek», Ługowski Jan «Panoszek», Ługowski Szymon «Panoszek»10 persons on 10 hearths
A collective entry: the surname „Ługowskich” stands once, at the end, and beside each person stands a byname. „Bart. Krolika” is STRUCK OUT on the card and does not enter the ten persons — the same Bartłomiej has an entry of his own, 2 (3 hearths); I do not count the struck-out name in, so as not to count him twice. Without him it comes to exactly 10 persons on 10 hearths. Above „Panoszka” stands a superscript „2” — I read it as a sign that the byname refers to both of the preceding forenames (Jan and Szymon) [reading uncertain]. The spelling of the byname Wyszek differs three times over on this one card: „Wyzka” (Marcin), „Wyszków” (the 2 Andrzejs), „Wyżka” with a dot over the z (Łukasz) — I do not smooth it out; in the text of the extract it stands as it does on the card. The nominatives of the bynames „Wyszek” and „Panoszek” are a reconstruction from the genitive, the card gives only oblique forms [reading uncertain]; the byname „Kępia” I leave in the form from the card, because the nominative cannot be restored unambiguously (Kęp? Kępa?).
the same entry also names: Ługowski Maciej «Krolik», Ługowski Stanisław «Krolik», Ługowski Antoni «Kępia», Ługowski Marcin «Wyszek», Ługowski Andrzej «Wyszek», Ługowski Andrzej «Wyszek», Ługowski Leonard «Kępia», Ługowski Łukasz «Wyszek», Ługowski Szymon «Panoszek»10 persons on 10 hearths
A collective entry: the surname „Ługowskich” stands once, at the end, and beside each person stands a byname. „Bart. Krolika” is STRUCK OUT on the card and does not enter the ten persons — the same Bartłomiej has an entry of his own, 2 (3 hearths); I do not count the struck-out name in, so as not to count him twice. Without him it comes to exactly 10 persons on 10 hearths. Above „Panoszka” stands a superscript „2” — I read it as a sign that the byname refers to both of the preceding forenames (Jan and Szymon) [reading uncertain]. The spelling of the byname Wyszek differs three times over on this one card: „Wyzka” (Marcin), „Wyszków” (the 2 Andrzejs), „Wyżka” with a dot over the z (Łukasz) — I do not smooth it out; in the text of the extract it stands as it does on the card. The nominatives of the bynames „Wyszek” and „Panoszek” are a reconstruction from the genitive, the card gives only oblique forms [reading uncertain]; the byname „Kępia” I leave in the form from the card, because the nominative cannot be restored unambiguously (Kęp? Kępa?).
the same entry also names: Ługowski Maciej «Krolik», Ługowski Stanisław «Krolik», Ługowski Antoni «Kępia», Ługowski Marcin «Wyszek», Ługowski Andrzej «Wyszek», Ługowski Andrzej «Wyszek», Ługowski Łukasz «Wyszek», Ługowski Jan «Panoszek», Ługowski Szymon «Panoszek»10 persons on 10 hearths
A collective entry: the surname „Ługowskich” stands once, at the end, and beside each person stands a byname. „Bart. Krolika” is STRUCK OUT on the card and does not enter the ten persons — the same Bartłomiej has an entry of his own, 2 (3 hearths); I do not count the struck-out name in, so as not to count him twice. Without him it comes to exactly 10 persons on 10 hearths. Above „Panoszka” stands a superscript „2” — I read it as a sign that the byname refers to both of the preceding forenames (Jan and Szymon) [reading uncertain]. The spelling of the byname Wyszek differs three times over on this one card: „Wyzka” (Marcin), „Wyszków” (the 2 Andrzejs), „Wyżka” with a dot over the z (Łukasz) — I do not smooth it out; in the text of the extract it stands as it does on the card. The nominatives of the bynames „Wyszek” and „Panoszek” are a reconstruction from the genitive, the card gives only oblique forms [reading uncertain]; the byname „Kępia” I leave in the form from the card, because the nominative cannot be restored unambiguously (Kęp? Kępa?).
the same entry also names: Ługowski Maciej «Krolik», Ługowski Stanisław «Krolik», Ługowski Antoni «Kępia», Ługowski Marcin «Wyszek», Ługowski Andrzej «Wyszek», Ługowski Andrzej «Wyszek», Ługowski Leonard «Kępia», Ługowski Jan «Panoszek», Ługowski Szymon «Panoszek»10 persons on 10 hearths
A collective entry: the surname „Ługowskich” stands once, at the end, and beside each person stands a byname. „Bart. Krolika” is STRUCK OUT on the card and does not enter the ten persons — the same Bartłomiej has an entry of his own, 2 (3 hearths); I do not count the struck-out name in, so as not to count him twice. Without him it comes to exactly 10 persons on 10 hearths. Above „Panoszka” stands a superscript „2” — I read it as a sign that the byname refers to both of the preceding forenames (Jan and Szymon) [reading uncertain]. The spelling of the byname Wyszek differs three times over on this one card: „Wyzka” (Marcin), „Wyszków” (the 2 Andrzejs), „Wyżka” with a dot over the z (Łukasz) — I do not smooth it out; in the text of the extract it stands as it does on the card. The nominatives of the bynames „Wyszek” and „Panoszek” are a reconstruction from the genitive, the card gives only oblique forms [reading uncertain]; the byname „Kępia” I leave in the form from the card, because the nominative cannot be restored unambiguously (Kęp? Kępa?).
the same entry also names: Ługowski Stanisław «Krolik», Ługowski Antoni «Kępia», Ługowski Marcin «Wyszek», Ługowski Andrzej «Wyszek», Ługowski Andrzej «Wyszek», Ługowski Leonard «Kępia», Ługowski Łukasz «Wyszek», Ługowski Jan «Panoszek», Ługowski Szymon «Panoszek»10 persons on 10 hearths
A collective entry: the surname „Ługowskich” stands once, at the end, and beside each person stands a byname. „Bart. Krolika” is STRUCK OUT on the card and does not enter the ten persons — the same Bartłomiej has an entry of his own, 2 (3 hearths); I do not count the struck-out name in, so as not to count him twice. Without him it comes to exactly 10 persons on 10 hearths. Above „Panoszka” stands a superscript „2” — I read it as a sign that the byname refers to both of the preceding forenames (Jan and Szymon) [reading uncertain]. The spelling of the byname Wyszek differs three times over on this one card: „Wyzka” (Marcin), „Wyszków” (the 2 Andrzejs), „Wyżka” with a dot over the z (Łukasz) — I do not smooth it out; in the text of the extract it stands as it does on the card. The nominatives of the bynames „Wyszek” and „Panoszek” are a reconstruction from the genitive, the card gives only oblique forms [reading uncertain]; the byname „Kępia” I leave in the form from the card, because the nominative cannot be restored unambiguously (Kęp? Kępa?).
the same entry also names: Ługowski Maciej «Krolik», Ługowski Stanisław «Krolik», Ługowski Antoni «Kępia», Ługowski Andrzej «Wyszek», Ługowski Andrzej «Wyszek», Ługowski Leonard «Kępia», Ługowski Łukasz «Wyszek», Ługowski Jan «Panoszek», Ługowski Szymon «Panoszek»10 persons on 10 hearths
A collective entry: the surname „Ługowskich” stands once, at the end, and beside each person stands a byname. „Bart. Krolika” is STRUCK OUT on the card and does not enter the ten persons — the same Bartłomiej has an entry of his own, 2 (3 hearths); I do not count the struck-out name in, so as not to count him twice. Without him it comes to exactly 10 persons on 10 hearths. Above „Panoszka” stands a superscript „2” — I read it as a sign that the byname refers to both of the preceding forenames (Jan and Szymon) [reading uncertain]. The spelling of the byname Wyszek differs three times over on this one card: „Wyzka” (Marcin), „Wyszków” (the 2 Andrzejs), „Wyżka” with a dot over the z (Łukasz) — I do not smooth it out; in the text of the extract it stands as it does on the card. The nominatives of the bynames „Wyszek” and „Panoszek” are a reconstruction from the genitive, the card gives only oblique forms [reading uncertain]; the byname „Kępia” I leave in the form from the card, because the nominative cannot be restored unambiguously (Kęp? Kępa?).
the same entry also names: Ługowski Maciej «Krolik», Ługowski Antoni «Kępia», Ługowski Marcin «Wyszek», Ługowski Andrzej «Wyszek», Ługowski Andrzej «Wyszek», Ługowski Leonard «Kępia», Ługowski Łukasz «Wyszek», Ługowski Jan «Panoszek», Ługowski Szymon «Panoszek»10 persons on 10 hearths
A collective entry: the surname „Ługowskich” stands once, at the end, and beside each person stands a byname. „Bart. Krolika” is STRUCK OUT on the card and does not enter the ten persons — the same Bartłomiej has an entry of his own, 2 (3 hearths); I do not count the struck-out name in, so as not to count him twice. Without him it comes to exactly 10 persons on 10 hearths. Above „Panoszka” stands a superscript „2” — I read it as a sign that the byname refers to both of the preceding forenames (Jan and Szymon) [reading uncertain]. The spelling of the byname Wyszek differs three times over on this one card: „Wyzka” (Marcin), „Wyszków” (the 2 Andrzejs), „Wyżka” with a dot over the z (Łukasz) — I do not smooth it out; in the text of the extract it stands as it does on the card. The nominatives of the bynames „Wyszek” and „Panoszek” are a reconstruction from the genitive, the card gives only oblique forms [reading uncertain]; the byname „Kępia” I leave in the form from the card, because the nominative cannot be restored unambiguously (Kęp? Kępa?).
the same entry also names: Ługowski Maciej «Krolik», Ługowski Stanisław «Krolik», Ługowski Antoni «Kępia», Ługowski Marcin «Wyszek», Ługowski Andrzej «Wyszek», Ługowski Andrzej «Wyszek», Ługowski Leonard «Kępia», Ługowski Łukasz «Wyszek», Ługowski Jan «Panoszek»10 persons on 10 hearths
A collective entry: the surname „Ługowskich” stands once, at the end, and beside each person stands a byname. „Bart. Krolika” is STRUCK OUT on the card and does not enter the ten persons — the same Bartłomiej has an entry of his own, 2 (3 hearths); I do not count the struck-out name in, so as not to count him twice. Without him it comes to exactly 10 persons on 10 hearths. Above „Panoszka” stands a superscript „2” — I read it as a sign that the byname refers to both of the preceding forenames (Jan and Szymon) [reading uncertain]. The spelling of the byname Wyszek differs three times over on this one card: „Wyzka” (Marcin), „Wyszków” (the 2 Andrzejs), „Wyżka” with a dot over the z (Łukasz) — I do not smooth it out; in the text of the extract it stands as it does on the card. The nominatives of the bynames „Wyszek” and „Panoszek” are a reconstruction from the genitive, the card gives only oblique forms [reading uncertain]; the byname „Kępia” I leave in the form from the card, because the nominative cannot be restored unambiguously (Kęp? Kępa?).
The same person whom the card struck out of entry 1. The abbreviation „Bart.” expanded as Bartłomiej.
the same entry also names: Ługowski Andrzej, Ługowski Jakub, Ługowski Wojciech, Ługowski Antoni, Ługowski Wincenty, Ługowski Jadwiga, Ługowski Mateusz, Ługowski Leonard, Ługowski Marcin, Ługowski Fabjan, Ługowski Wojciech, Ługowski Szymon, Ługowski Maciej, Ługowski Szczepan, Ługowski Jan, Ługowski Fabjan, Ługowski Jadwiga †18 persons on 15 hearths
Eighteen persons on fifteen hearths, and so it should be: the card itself joins three groups of two persons on one hearth — „Wojciecha z bratem”, „Fabjana i Wojciecha (1 d.)”, „Jana i Fabjana (1 d.)”. The units come to exactly fifteen. The brother of Wojciech without a forename. The buildings: the card writes „każde po 1 dworze, prócz suk. Jadwigi”, and beside the successors of Jadwiga „chał. bez ogrod.” — hence 14 manor houses + 1 cottage (chałupa) = 15 d. Above a struck-out word in that bracket „bez” was added; after „prócz” a short word is struck out („za”?) [reading uncertain]. NOTE: the forename of Jadwiga stands in this entry TWICE — once among the living co-holders (with a manor house), once at the end as „sukc. Jadwigi” (with a cottage). I transcribe it as it stands; whether these are two different women or a slip of the copyist, the card does not decide. In T90 (card 3) there is already only „sukces. Jadwigi Ługowskiej”. The surname of both women I record in the masculine plural from the card („Ługowskich” → Ługowski), because in a collective entry the card gives no other form.
the same entry also names: Ługowski Jakub, Ługowski Wojciech, Ługowski, Ługowski Antoni, Ługowski Wincenty, Ługowski Jadwiga, Ługowski Mateusz, Ługowski Leonard, Ługowski Marcin, Ługowski Fabjan, Ługowski Wojciech, Ługowski Szymon, Ługowski Maciej, Ługowski Szczepan, Ługowski Jan, Ługowski Fabjan, Ługowski Jadwiga †18 persons on 15 hearths
Eighteen persons on fifteen hearths, and so it should be: the card itself joins three groups of two persons on one hearth — „Wojciecha z bratem”, „Fabjana i Wojciecha (1 d.)”, „Jana i Fabjana (1 d.)”. The units come to exactly fifteen. The brother of Wojciech without a forename. The buildings: the card writes „każde po 1 dworze, prócz suk. Jadwigi”, and beside the successors of Jadwiga „chał. bez ogrod.” — hence 14 manor houses + 1 cottage (chałupa) = 15 d. Above a struck-out word in that bracket „bez” was added; after „prócz” a short word is struck out („za”?) [reading uncertain]. NOTE: the forename of Jadwiga stands in this entry TWICE — once among the living co-holders (with a manor house), once at the end as „sukc. Jadwigi” (with a cottage). I transcribe it as it stands; whether these are two different women or a slip of the copyist, the card does not decide. In T90 (card 3) there is already only „sukces. Jadwigi Ługowskiej”. The surname of both women I record in the masculine plural from the card („Ługowskich” → Ługowski), because in a collective entry the card gives no other form.
the same entry also names: Ługowski Andrzej, Ługowski Jakub, Ługowski Wojciech, Ługowski, Ługowski Wincenty, Ługowski Jadwiga, Ługowski Mateusz, Ługowski Leonard, Ługowski Marcin, Ługowski Fabjan, Ługowski Wojciech, Ługowski Szymon, Ługowski Maciej, Ługowski Szczepan, Ługowski Jan, Ługowski Fabjan, Ługowski Jadwiga †18 persons on 15 hearths
Eighteen persons on fifteen hearths, and so it should be: the card itself joins three groups of two persons on one hearth — „Wojciecha z bratem”, „Fabjana i Wojciecha (1 d.)”, „Jana i Fabjana (1 d.)”. The units come to exactly fifteen. The brother of Wojciech without a forename. The buildings: the card writes „każde po 1 dworze, prócz suk. Jadwigi”, and beside the successors of Jadwiga „chał. bez ogrod.” — hence 14 manor houses + 1 cottage (chałupa) = 15 d. Above a struck-out word in that bracket „bez” was added; after „prócz” a short word is struck out („za”?) [reading uncertain]. NOTE: the forename of Jadwiga stands in this entry TWICE — once among the living co-holders (with a manor house), once at the end as „sukc. Jadwigi” (with a cottage). I transcribe it as it stands; whether these are two different women or a slip of the copyist, the card does not decide. In T90 (card 3) there is already only „sukces. Jadwigi Ługowskiej”. The surname of both women I record in the masculine plural from the card („Ługowskich” → Ługowski), because in a collective entry the card gives no other form.
the same entry also names: Ługowski Andrzej, Ługowski Jakub, Ługowski Wojciech, Ługowski, Ługowski Antoni, Ługowski Wincenty, Ługowski Jadwiga, Ługowski Mateusz, Ługowski Leonard, Ługowski Marcin, Ługowski Wojciech, Ługowski Szymon, Ługowski Maciej, Ługowski Szczepan, Ługowski Jan, Ługowski Fabjan, Ługowski Jadwiga †18 persons on 15 hearths
Eighteen persons on fifteen hearths, and so it should be: the card itself joins three groups of two persons on one hearth — „Wojciecha z bratem”, „Fabjana i Wojciecha (1 d.)”, „Jana i Fabjana (1 d.)”. The units come to exactly fifteen. The brother of Wojciech without a forename. The buildings: the card writes „każde po 1 dworze, prócz suk. Jadwigi”, and beside the successors of Jadwiga „chał. bez ogrod.” — hence 14 manor houses + 1 cottage (chałupa) = 15 d. Above a struck-out word in that bracket „bez” was added; after „prócz” a short word is struck out („za”?) [reading uncertain]. NOTE: the forename of Jadwiga stands in this entry TWICE — once among the living co-holders (with a manor house), once at the end as „sukc. Jadwigi” (with a cottage). I transcribe it as it stands; whether these are two different women or a slip of the copyist, the card does not decide. In T90 (card 3) there is already only „sukces. Jadwigi Ługowskiej”. The surname of both women I record in the masculine plural from the card („Ługowskich” → Ługowski), because in a collective entry the card gives no other form.
the same entry also names: Ługowski Andrzej, Ługowski Jakub, Ługowski Wojciech, Ługowski, Ługowski Antoni, Ługowski Wincenty, Ługowski Jadwiga, Ługowski Mateusz, Ługowski Leonard, Ługowski Marcin, Ługowski Fabjan, Ługowski Wojciech, Ługowski Szymon, Ługowski Maciej, Ługowski Szczepan, Ługowski Jan, Ługowski Jadwiga †18 persons on 15 hearths
Eighteen persons on fifteen hearths, and so it should be: the card itself joins three groups of two persons on one hearth — „Wojciecha z bratem”, „Fabjana i Wojciecha (1 d.)”, „Jana i Fabjana (1 d.)”. The units come to exactly fifteen. The brother of Wojciech without a forename. The buildings: the card writes „każde po 1 dworze, prócz suk. Jadwigi”, and beside the successors of Jadwiga „chał. bez ogrod.” — hence 14 manor houses + 1 cottage (chałupa) = 15 d. Above a struck-out word in that bracket „bez” was added; after „prócz” a short word is struck out („za”?) [reading uncertain]. NOTE: the forename of Jadwiga stands in this entry TWICE — once among the living co-holders (with a manor house), once at the end as „sukc. Jadwigi” (with a cottage). I transcribe it as it stands; whether these are two different women or a slip of the copyist, the card does not decide. In T90 (card 3) there is already only „sukces. Jadwigi Ługowskiej”. The surname of both women I record in the masculine plural from the card („Ługowskich” → Ługowski), because in a collective entry the card gives no other form.
the same entry also names: Ługowski Andrzej, Ługowski Jakub, Ługowski Wojciech, Ługowski, Ługowski Antoni, Ługowski Wincenty, Ługowski Mateusz, Ługowski Leonard, Ługowski Marcin, Ługowski Fabjan, Ługowski Wojciech, Ługowski Szymon, Ługowski Maciej, Ługowski Szczepan, Ługowski Jan, Ługowski Fabjan, Ługowski Jadwiga †18 persons on 15 hearths
Eighteen persons on fifteen hearths, and so it should be: the card itself joins three groups of two persons on one hearth — „Wojciecha z bratem”, „Fabjana i Wojciecha (1 d.)”, „Jana i Fabjana (1 d.)”. The units come to exactly fifteen. The brother of Wojciech without a forename. The buildings: the card writes „każde po 1 dworze, prócz suk. Jadwigi”, and beside the successors of Jadwiga „chał. bez ogrod.” — hence 14 manor houses + 1 cottage (chałupa) = 15 d. Above a struck-out word in that bracket „bez” was added; after „prócz” a short word is struck out („za”?) [reading uncertain]. NOTE: the forename of Jadwiga stands in this entry TWICE — once among the living co-holders (with a manor house), once at the end as „sukc. Jadwigi” (with a cottage). I transcribe it as it stands; whether these are two different women or a slip of the copyist, the card does not decide. In T90 (card 3) there is already only „sukces. Jadwigi Ługowskiej”. The surname of both women I record in the masculine plural from the card („Ługowskich” → Ługowski), because in a collective entry the card gives no other form.
the same entry also names: Ługowski Andrzej, Ługowski Jakub, Ługowski Wojciech, Ługowski, Ługowski Antoni, Ługowski Wincenty, Ługowski Jadwiga, Ługowski Mateusz, Ługowski Leonard, Ługowski Marcin, Ługowski Fabjan, Ługowski Wojciech, Ługowski Szymon, Ługowski Maciej, Ługowski Szczepan, Ługowski Jan, Ługowski Fabjan18 persons on 15 hearths
Eighteen persons on fifteen hearths, and so it should be: the card itself joins three groups of two persons on one hearth — „Wojciecha z bratem”, „Fabjana i Wojciecha (1 d.)”, „Jana i Fabjana (1 d.)”. The units come to exactly fifteen. The brother of Wojciech without a forename. The buildings: the card writes „każde po 1 dworze, prócz suk. Jadwigi”, and beside the successors of Jadwiga „chał. bez ogrod.” — hence 14 manor houses + 1 cottage (chałupa) = 15 d. Above a struck-out word in that bracket „bez” was added; after „prócz” a short word is struck out („za”?) [reading uncertain]. NOTE: the forename of Jadwiga stands in this entry TWICE — once among the living co-holders (with a manor house), once at the end as „sukc. Jadwigi” (with a cottage). I transcribe it as it stands; whether these are two different women or a slip of the copyist, the card does not decide. In T90 (card 3) there is already only „sukces. Jadwigi Ługowskiej”. The surname of both women I record in the masculine plural from the card („Ługowskich” → Ługowski), because in a collective entry the card gives no other form.
the same entry also names: Ługowski Andrzej, Ługowski Wojciech, Ługowski, Ługowski Antoni, Ługowski Wincenty, Ługowski Jadwiga, Ługowski Mateusz, Ługowski Leonard, Ługowski Marcin, Ługowski Fabjan, Ługowski Wojciech, Ługowski Szymon, Ługowski Maciej, Ługowski Szczepan, Ługowski Jan, Ługowski Fabjan, Ługowski Jadwiga †18 persons on 15 hearths
Eighteen persons on fifteen hearths, and so it should be: the card itself joins three groups of two persons on one hearth — „Wojciecha z bratem”, „Fabjana i Wojciecha (1 d.)”, „Jana i Fabjana (1 d.)”. The units come to exactly fifteen. The brother of Wojciech without a forename. The buildings: the card writes „każde po 1 dworze, prócz suk. Jadwigi”, and beside the successors of Jadwiga „chał. bez ogrod.” — hence 14 manor houses + 1 cottage (chałupa) = 15 d. Above a struck-out word in that bracket „bez” was added; after „prócz” a short word is struck out („za”?) [reading uncertain]. NOTE: the forename of Jadwiga stands in this entry TWICE — once among the living co-holders (with a manor house), once at the end as „sukc. Jadwigi” (with a cottage). I transcribe it as it stands; whether these are two different women or a slip of the copyist, the card does not decide. In T90 (card 3) there is already only „sukces. Jadwigi Ługowskiej”. The surname of both women I record in the masculine plural from the card („Ługowskich” → Ługowski), because in a collective entry the card gives no other form.
the same entry also names: Ługowski Andrzej, Ługowski Jakub, Ługowski Wojciech, Ługowski, Ługowski Antoni, Ługowski Wincenty, Ługowski Jadwiga, Ługowski Mateusz, Ługowski Leonard, Ługowski Marcin, Ługowski Fabjan, Ługowski Wojciech, Ługowski Szymon, Ługowski Maciej, Ługowski Szczepan, Ługowski Fabjan, Ługowski Jadwiga †18 persons on 15 hearths
Eighteen persons on fifteen hearths, and so it should be: the card itself joins three groups of two persons on one hearth — „Wojciecha z bratem”, „Fabjana i Wojciecha (1 d.)”, „Jana i Fabjana (1 d.)”. The units come to exactly fifteen. The brother of Wojciech without a forename. The buildings: the card writes „każde po 1 dworze, prócz suk. Jadwigi”, and beside the successors of Jadwiga „chał. bez ogrod.” — hence 14 manor houses + 1 cottage (chałupa) = 15 d. Above a struck-out word in that bracket „bez” was added; after „prócz” a short word is struck out („za”?) [reading uncertain]. NOTE: the forename of Jadwiga stands in this entry TWICE — once among the living co-holders (with a manor house), once at the end as „sukc. Jadwigi” (with a cottage). I transcribe it as it stands; whether these are two different women or a slip of the copyist, the card does not decide. In T90 (card 3) there is already only „sukces. Jadwigi Ługowskiej”. The surname of both women I record in the masculine plural from the card („Ługowskich” → Ługowski), because in a collective entry the card gives no other form.
the same entry also names: Ługowski Andrzej, Ługowski Jakub, Ługowski Wojciech, Ługowski, Ługowski Antoni, Ługowski Wincenty, Ługowski Jadwiga, Ługowski Mateusz, Ługowski Marcin, Ługowski Fabjan, Ługowski Wojciech, Ługowski Szymon, Ługowski Maciej, Ługowski Szczepan, Ługowski Jan, Ługowski Fabjan, Ługowski Jadwiga †18 persons on 15 hearths
Eighteen persons on fifteen hearths, and so it should be: the card itself joins three groups of two persons on one hearth — „Wojciecha z bratem”, „Fabjana i Wojciecha (1 d.)”, „Jana i Fabjana (1 d.)”. The units come to exactly fifteen. The brother of Wojciech without a forename. The buildings: the card writes „każde po 1 dworze, prócz suk. Jadwigi”, and beside the successors of Jadwiga „chał. bez ogrod.” — hence 14 manor houses + 1 cottage (chałupa) = 15 d. Above a struck-out word in that bracket „bez” was added; after „prócz” a short word is struck out („za”?) [reading uncertain]. NOTE: the forename of Jadwiga stands in this entry TWICE — once among the living co-holders (with a manor house), once at the end as „sukc. Jadwigi” (with a cottage). I transcribe it as it stands; whether these are two different women or a slip of the copyist, the card does not decide. In T90 (card 3) there is already only „sukces. Jadwigi Ługowskiej”. The surname of both women I record in the masculine plural from the card („Ługowskich” → Ługowski), because in a collective entry the card gives no other form.
the same entry also names: Ługowski Andrzej, Ługowski Jakub, Ługowski Wojciech, Ługowski, Ługowski Antoni, Ługowski Wincenty, Ługowski Jadwiga, Ługowski Mateusz, Ługowski Leonard, Ługowski Marcin, Ługowski Fabjan, Ługowski Wojciech, Ługowski Szymon, Ługowski Szczepan, Ługowski Jan, Ługowski Fabjan, Ługowski Jadwiga †18 persons on 15 hearths
Eighteen persons on fifteen hearths, and so it should be: the card itself joins three groups of two persons on one hearth — „Wojciecha z bratem”, „Fabjana i Wojciecha (1 d.)”, „Jana i Fabjana (1 d.)”. The units come to exactly fifteen. The brother of Wojciech without a forename. The buildings: the card writes „każde po 1 dworze, prócz suk. Jadwigi”, and beside the successors of Jadwiga „chał. bez ogrod.” — hence 14 manor houses + 1 cottage (chałupa) = 15 d. Above a struck-out word in that bracket „bez” was added; after „prócz” a short word is struck out („za”?) [reading uncertain]. NOTE: the forename of Jadwiga stands in this entry TWICE — once among the living co-holders (with a manor house), once at the end as „sukc. Jadwigi” (with a cottage). I transcribe it as it stands; whether these are two different women or a slip of the copyist, the card does not decide. In T90 (card 3) there is already only „sukces. Jadwigi Ługowskiej”. The surname of both women I record in the masculine plural from the card („Ługowskich” → Ługowski), because in a collective entry the card gives no other form.
the same entry also names: Ługowski Andrzej, Ługowski Jakub, Ługowski Wojciech, Ługowski, Ługowski Antoni, Ługowski Wincenty, Ługowski Jadwiga, Ługowski Mateusz, Ługowski Leonard, Ługowski Fabjan, Ługowski Wojciech, Ługowski Szymon, Ługowski Maciej, Ługowski Szczepan, Ługowski Jan, Ługowski Fabjan, Ługowski Jadwiga †18 persons on 15 hearths
Eighteen persons on fifteen hearths, and so it should be: the card itself joins three groups of two persons on one hearth — „Wojciecha z bratem”, „Fabjana i Wojciecha (1 d.)”, „Jana i Fabjana (1 d.)”. The units come to exactly fifteen. The brother of Wojciech without a forename. The buildings: the card writes „każde po 1 dworze, prócz suk. Jadwigi”, and beside the successors of Jadwiga „chał. bez ogrod.” — hence 14 manor houses + 1 cottage (chałupa) = 15 d. Above a struck-out word in that bracket „bez” was added; after „prócz” a short word is struck out („za”?) [reading uncertain]. NOTE: the forename of Jadwiga stands in this entry TWICE — once among the living co-holders (with a manor house), once at the end as „sukc. Jadwigi” (with a cottage). I transcribe it as it stands; whether these are two different women or a slip of the copyist, the card does not decide. In T90 (card 3) there is already only „sukces. Jadwigi Ługowskiej”. The surname of both women I record in the masculine plural from the card („Ługowskich” → Ługowski), because in a collective entry the card gives no other form.
the same entry also names: Ługowski Andrzej, Ługowski Jakub, Ługowski Wojciech, Ługowski, Ługowski Antoni, Ługowski Wincenty, Ługowski Jadwiga, Ługowski Leonard, Ługowski Marcin, Ługowski Fabjan, Ługowski Wojciech, Ługowski Szymon, Ługowski Maciej, Ługowski Szczepan, Ługowski Jan, Ługowski Fabjan, Ługowski Jadwiga †18 persons on 15 hearths
Eighteen persons on fifteen hearths, and so it should be: the card itself joins three groups of two persons on one hearth — „Wojciecha z bratem”, „Fabjana i Wojciecha (1 d.)”, „Jana i Fabjana (1 d.)”. The units come to exactly fifteen. The brother of Wojciech without a forename. The buildings: the card writes „każde po 1 dworze, prócz suk. Jadwigi”, and beside the successors of Jadwiga „chał. bez ogrod.” — hence 14 manor houses + 1 cottage (chałupa) = 15 d. Above a struck-out word in that bracket „bez” was added; after „prócz” a short word is struck out („za”?) [reading uncertain]. NOTE: the forename of Jadwiga stands in this entry TWICE — once among the living co-holders (with a manor house), once at the end as „sukc. Jadwigi” (with a cottage). I transcribe it as it stands; whether these are two different women or a slip of the copyist, the card does not decide. In T90 (card 3) there is already only „sukces. Jadwigi Ługowskiej”. The surname of both women I record in the masculine plural from the card („Ługowskich” → Ługowski), because in a collective entry the card gives no other form.
the same entry also names: Ługowski Andrzej, Ługowski Jakub, Ługowski Wojciech, Ługowski, Ługowski Antoni, Ługowski Wincenty, Ługowski Jadwiga, Ługowski Mateusz, Ługowski Leonard, Ługowski Marcin, Ługowski Fabjan, Ługowski Wojciech, Ługowski Szymon, Ługowski Maciej, Ługowski Jan, Ługowski Fabjan, Ługowski Jadwiga †18 persons on 15 hearths
Eighteen persons on fifteen hearths, and so it should be: the card itself joins three groups of two persons on one hearth — „Wojciecha z bratem”, „Fabjana i Wojciecha (1 d.)”, „Jana i Fabjana (1 d.)”. The units come to exactly fifteen. The brother of Wojciech without a forename. The buildings: the card writes „każde po 1 dworze, prócz suk. Jadwigi”, and beside the successors of Jadwiga „chał. bez ogrod.” — hence 14 manor houses + 1 cottage (chałupa) = 15 d. Above a struck-out word in that bracket „bez” was added; after „prócz” a short word is struck out („za”?) [reading uncertain]. NOTE: the forename of Jadwiga stands in this entry TWICE — once among the living co-holders (with a manor house), once at the end as „sukc. Jadwigi” (with a cottage). I transcribe it as it stands; whether these are two different women or a slip of the copyist, the card does not decide. In T90 (card 3) there is already only „sukces. Jadwigi Ługowskiej”. The surname of both women I record in the masculine plural from the card („Ługowskich” → Ługowski), because in a collective entry the card gives no other form.
the same entry also names: Ługowski Andrzej, Ługowski Jakub, Ługowski Wojciech, Ługowski, Ługowski Antoni, Ługowski Wincenty, Ługowski Jadwiga, Ługowski Mateusz, Ługowski Leonard, Ługowski Marcin, Ługowski Fabjan, Ługowski Wojciech, Ługowski Maciej, Ługowski Szczepan, Ługowski Jan, Ługowski Fabjan, Ługowski Jadwiga †18 persons on 15 hearths
Eighteen persons on fifteen hearths, and so it should be: the card itself joins three groups of two persons on one hearth — „Wojciecha z bratem”, „Fabjana i Wojciecha (1 d.)”, „Jana i Fabjana (1 d.)”. The units come to exactly fifteen. The brother of Wojciech without a forename. The buildings: the card writes „każde po 1 dworze, prócz suk. Jadwigi”, and beside the successors of Jadwiga „chał. bez ogrod.” — hence 14 manor houses + 1 cottage (chałupa) = 15 d. Above a struck-out word in that bracket „bez” was added; after „prócz” a short word is struck out („za”?) [reading uncertain]. NOTE: the forename of Jadwiga stands in this entry TWICE — once among the living co-holders (with a manor house), once at the end as „sukc. Jadwigi” (with a cottage). I transcribe it as it stands; whether these are two different women or a slip of the copyist, the card does not decide. In T90 (card 3) there is already only „sukces. Jadwigi Ługowskiej”. The surname of both women I record in the masculine plural from the card („Ługowskich” → Ługowski), because in a collective entry the card gives no other form.
the same entry also names: Ługowski Andrzej, Ługowski Jakub, Ługowski Wojciech, Ługowski, Ługowski Antoni, Ługowski Jadwiga, Ługowski Mateusz, Ługowski Leonard, Ługowski Marcin, Ługowski Fabjan, Ługowski Wojciech, Ługowski Szymon, Ługowski Maciej, Ługowski Szczepan, Ługowski Jan, Ługowski Fabjan, Ługowski Jadwiga †18 persons on 15 hearths
Eighteen persons on fifteen hearths, and so it should be: the card itself joins three groups of two persons on one hearth — „Wojciecha z bratem”, „Fabjana i Wojciecha (1 d.)”, „Jana i Fabjana (1 d.)”. The units come to exactly fifteen. The brother of Wojciech without a forename. The buildings: the card writes „każde po 1 dworze, prócz suk. Jadwigi”, and beside the successors of Jadwiga „chał. bez ogrod.” — hence 14 manor houses + 1 cottage (chałupa) = 15 d. Above a struck-out word in that bracket „bez” was added; after „prócz” a short word is struck out („za”?) [reading uncertain]. NOTE: the forename of Jadwiga stands in this entry TWICE — once among the living co-holders (with a manor house), once at the end as „sukc. Jadwigi” (with a cottage). I transcribe it as it stands; whether these are two different women or a slip of the copyist, the card does not decide. In T90 (card 3) there is already only „sukces. Jadwigi Ługowskiej”. The surname of both women I record in the masculine plural from the card („Ługowskich” → Ługowski), because in a collective entry the card gives no other form.
the same entry also names: Ługowski Andrzej, Ługowski Jakub, Ługowski, Ługowski Antoni, Ługowski Wincenty, Ługowski Jadwiga, Ługowski Mateusz, Ługowski Leonard, Ługowski Marcin, Ługowski Fabjan, Ługowski Wojciech, Ługowski Szymon, Ługowski Maciej, Ługowski Szczepan, Ługowski Jan, Ługowski Fabjan, Ługowski Jadwiga †18 persons on 15 hearths
Eighteen persons on fifteen hearths, and so it should be: the card itself joins three groups of two persons on one hearth — „Wojciecha z bratem”, „Fabjana i Wojciecha (1 d.)”, „Jana i Fabjana (1 d.)”. The units come to exactly fifteen. The brother of Wojciech without a forename. The buildings: the card writes „każde po 1 dworze, prócz suk. Jadwigi”, and beside the successors of Jadwiga „chał. bez ogrod.” — hence 14 manor houses + 1 cottage (chałupa) = 15 d. Above a struck-out word in that bracket „bez” was added; after „prócz” a short word is struck out („za”?) [reading uncertain]. NOTE: the forename of Jadwiga stands in this entry TWICE — once among the living co-holders (with a manor house), once at the end as „sukc. Jadwigi” (with a cottage). I transcribe it as it stands; whether these are two different women or a slip of the copyist, the card does not decide. In T90 (card 3) there is already only „sukces. Jadwigi Ługowskiej”. The surname of both women I record in the masculine plural from the card („Ługowskich” → Ługowski), because in a collective entry the card gives no other form.
the same entry also names: Ługowski Andrzej, Ługowski Jakub, Ługowski Wojciech, Ługowski, Ługowski Antoni, Ługowski Wincenty, Ługowski Jadwiga, Ługowski Mateusz, Ługowski Leonard, Ługowski Marcin, Ługowski Fabjan, Ługowski Szymon, Ługowski Maciej, Ługowski Szczepan, Ługowski Jan, Ługowski Fabjan, Ługowski Jadwiga †18 persons on 15 hearths
Eighteen persons on fifteen hearths, and so it should be: the card itself joins three groups of two persons on one hearth — „Wojciecha z bratem”, „Fabjana i Wojciecha (1 d.)”, „Jana i Fabjana (1 d.)”. The units come to exactly fifteen. The brother of Wojciech without a forename. The buildings: the card writes „każde po 1 dworze, prócz suk. Jadwigi”, and beside the successors of Jadwiga „chał. bez ogrod.” — hence 14 manor houses + 1 cottage (chałupa) = 15 d. Above a struck-out word in that bracket „bez” was added; after „prócz” a short word is struck out („za”?) [reading uncertain]. NOTE: the forename of Jadwiga stands in this entry TWICE — once among the living co-holders (with a manor house), once at the end as „sukc. Jadwigi” (with a cottage). I transcribe it as it stands; whether these are two different women or a slip of the copyist, the card does not decide. In T90 (card 3) there is already only „sukces. Jadwigi Ługowskiej”. The surname of both women I record in the masculine plural from the card („Ługowskich” → Ługowski), because in a collective entry the card gives no other form.
The last entry of the left-hand column.
Antoni Ługowski stands twice on this card — here and in entry P2. The card distinguishes them by nothing; I do not decide whether these are two persons or a repetition.
Fabian Ługowski stands twice on this card (here and L8) — in agreement with T89 and T94, which likewise count two Fabjans. This card writes „Fabiana”, those write „Fabjana”.
The second Fabian Ługowski on this card; see L5.
The last entry of the right-hand column and of the whole card. Below it, outside the list, stands the explanation of a note: „1) ten sam” — it concerns entries L1 and P3, not this one.
The second Antoni Ługowski on this card; see L3. The entry stands above the horizontal stroke.
A woman: the feminine form of the surname on the card („Jadwigi Ługowskiej”) and a feminine forename. AN IMPORTANT DISCREPANCY: here Jadwiga holds the holding herself, without any „sukc.”, whereas T89 (card 4), the same year 1789), T90 and T94 speak of the „sukcesorach Jadwigi”, that is, of a person already dead. I do not smooth this over — I leave the mark for a deceased person empty, because this card says nothing of a death.
the same entry also names: Borkowski Antoni2 persons on 1 hearth
A woman recognised by the feminine form of the surname („Jadwigi Ługowskiej”) and by the forename; I record the surname in the feminine form from the card. The holding belongs to her successors, so Jadwiga herself is already dead. The holding is held by Antoni Borkowski — the same man who in T75, entry 8 (card 2), has a hearth of his own.
the same entry also names: Ługowski Andrzej, Ługowski Antoni, Ługowski Fabian, Ługowski Jan, Ługowski Fabian, Ługowski Jakób, Ługowski Leonard, Ługowski Maciej, Ługowski Marcin, Ługowski Mateusz, Ługowski Szymon, Ługowski Wincenty, Ługowski Wojciech, Ługowski Jan15 persons on 13 hearths
Fifteen persons on thirteen hearths — and so it should be. The card separates the co-holders with semicolons, and in two places joins two persons by the conjunction „i”: „Jana i Fabiana” and „Wojciecha i Jana”. Of such groups there are exactly thirteen and each has „po 1 dymie”, so those two pairs sit two to a hearth. The surname „Ługowskich” stands once, at the end, and refers to them all. „Stanisławowej” is a form derived from the husband's name — a woman whom the card does not name by a forename of her own; I record her literally in the recorded form of the name and do not expand her, and the surname I leave in the masculine plural from the card („Ługowskich” → Ługowski), because in a collective entry only such a form stands here.
the same entry also names: Ługowski Antoni, Ługowski Fabian, Ługowski Jan, Ługowski Fabian, Ługowski Jakób, Ługowski Leonard, Ługowski Maciej, Ługowski Marcin, Ługowski Mateusz, Ługowski, Ługowski Szymon, Ługowski Wincenty, Ługowski Wojciech, Ługowski Jan15 persons on 13 hearths
Fifteen persons on thirteen hearths — and so it should be. The card separates the co-holders with semicolons, and in two places joins two persons by the conjunction „i”: „Jana i Fabiana” and „Wojciecha i Jana”. Of such groups there are exactly thirteen and each has „po 1 dymie”, so those two pairs sit two to a hearth. The surname „Ługowskich” stands once, at the end, and refers to them all. „Stanisławowej” is a form derived from the husband's name — a woman whom the card does not name by a forename of her own; I record her literally in the recorded form of the name and do not expand her, and the surname I leave in the masculine plural from the card („Ługowskich” → Ługowski), because in a collective entry only such a form stands here.
the same entry also names: Ługowski Andrzej, Ługowski Fabian, Ługowski Jan, Ługowski Fabian, Ługowski Jakób, Ługowski Leonard, Ługowski Maciej, Ługowski Marcin, Ługowski Mateusz, Ługowski, Ługowski Szymon, Ługowski Wincenty, Ługowski Wojciech, Ługowski Jan15 persons on 13 hearths
Fifteen persons on thirteen hearths — and so it should be. The card separates the co-holders with semicolons, and in two places joins two persons by the conjunction „i”: „Jana i Fabiana” and „Wojciecha i Jana”. Of such groups there are exactly thirteen and each has „po 1 dymie”, so those two pairs sit two to a hearth. The surname „Ługowskich” stands once, at the end, and refers to them all. „Stanisławowej” is a form derived from the husband's name — a woman whom the card does not name by a forename of her own; I record her literally in the recorded form of the name and do not expand her, and the surname I leave in the masculine plural from the card („Ługowskich” → Ługowski), because in a collective entry only such a form stands here.
the same entry also names: Ługowski Andrzej, Ługowski Antoni, Ługowski Jan, Ługowski Fabian, Ługowski Jakób, Ługowski Leonard, Ługowski Maciej, Ługowski Marcin, Ługowski Mateusz, Ługowski, Ługowski Szymon, Ługowski Wincenty, Ługowski Wojciech, Ługowski Jan15 persons on 13 hearths
Fifteen persons on thirteen hearths — and so it should be. The card separates the co-holders with semicolons, and in two places joins two persons by the conjunction „i”: „Jana i Fabiana” and „Wojciecha i Jana”. Of such groups there are exactly thirteen and each has „po 1 dymie”, so those two pairs sit two to a hearth. The surname „Ługowskich” stands once, at the end, and refers to them all. „Stanisławowej” is a form derived from the husband's name — a woman whom the card does not name by a forename of her own; I record her literally in the recorded form of the name and do not expand her, and the surname I leave in the masculine plural from the card („Ługowskich” → Ługowski), because in a collective entry only such a form stands here.
the same entry also names: Ługowski Andrzej, Ługowski Antoni, Ługowski Fabian, Ługowski Jan, Ługowski Jakób, Ługowski Leonard, Ługowski Maciej, Ługowski Marcin, Ługowski Mateusz, Ługowski, Ługowski Szymon, Ługowski Wincenty, Ługowski Wojciech, Ługowski Jan15 persons on 13 hearths
Fifteen persons on thirteen hearths — and so it should be. The card separates the co-holders with semicolons, and in two places joins two persons by the conjunction „i”: „Jana i Fabiana” and „Wojciecha i Jana”. Of such groups there are exactly thirteen and each has „po 1 dymie”, so those two pairs sit two to a hearth. The surname „Ługowskich” stands once, at the end, and refers to them all. „Stanisławowej” is a form derived from the husband's name — a woman whom the card does not name by a forename of her own; I record her literally in the recorded form of the name and do not expand her, and the surname I leave in the masculine plural from the card („Ługowskich” → Ługowski), because in a collective entry only such a form stands here.
the same entry also names: Ługowski Andrzej, Ługowski Antoni, Ługowski Fabian, Ługowski Jan, Ługowski Fabian, Ługowski Leonard, Ługowski Maciej, Ługowski Marcin, Ługowski Mateusz, Ługowski, Ługowski Szymon, Ługowski Wincenty, Ługowski Wojciech, Ługowski Jan15 persons on 13 hearths
Fifteen persons on thirteen hearths — and so it should be. The card separates the co-holders with semicolons, and in two places joins two persons by the conjunction „i”: „Jana i Fabiana” and „Wojciecha i Jana”. Of such groups there are exactly thirteen and each has „po 1 dymie”, so those two pairs sit two to a hearth. The surname „Ługowskich” stands once, at the end, and refers to them all. „Stanisławowej” is a form derived from the husband's name — a woman whom the card does not name by a forename of her own; I record her literally in the recorded form of the name and do not expand her, and the surname I leave in the masculine plural from the card („Ługowskich” → Ługowski), because in a collective entry only such a form stands here.
the same entry also names: Ługowski Andrzej, Ługowski Antoni, Ługowski Fabian, Ługowski Fabian, Ługowski Jakób, Ługowski Leonard, Ługowski Maciej, Ługowski Marcin, Ługowski Mateusz, Ługowski, Ługowski Szymon, Ługowski Wincenty, Ługowski Wojciech, Ługowski Jan15 persons on 13 hearths
Fifteen persons on thirteen hearths — and so it should be. The card separates the co-holders with semicolons, and in two places joins two persons by the conjunction „i”: „Jana i Fabiana” and „Wojciecha i Jana”. Of such groups there are exactly thirteen and each has „po 1 dymie”, so those two pairs sit two to a hearth. The surname „Ługowskich” stands once, at the end, and refers to them all. „Stanisławowej” is a form derived from the husband's name — a woman whom the card does not name by a forename of her own; I record her literally in the recorded form of the name and do not expand her, and the surname I leave in the masculine plural from the card („Ługowskich” → Ługowski), because in a collective entry only such a form stands here.
the same entry also names: Ługowski Andrzej, Ługowski Antoni, Ługowski Fabian, Ługowski Jan, Ługowski Fabian, Ługowski Jakób, Ługowski Leonard, Ługowski Maciej, Ługowski Marcin, Ługowski Mateusz, Ługowski, Ługowski Szymon, Ługowski Wincenty, Ługowski Wojciech15 persons on 13 hearths
Fifteen persons on thirteen hearths — and so it should be. The card separates the co-holders with semicolons, and in two places joins two persons by the conjunction „i”: „Jana i Fabiana” and „Wojciecha i Jana”. Of such groups there are exactly thirteen and each has „po 1 dymie”, so those two pairs sit two to a hearth. The surname „Ługowskich” stands once, at the end, and refers to them all. „Stanisławowej” is a form derived from the husband's name — a woman whom the card does not name by a forename of her own; I record her literally in the recorded form of the name and do not expand her, and the surname I leave in the masculine plural from the card („Ługowskich” → Ługowski), because in a collective entry only such a form stands here.
the same entry also names: Ługowski Andrzej, Ługowski Antoni, Ługowski Fabian, Ługowski Jan, Ługowski Fabian, Ługowski Jakób, Ługowski Maciej, Ługowski Marcin, Ługowski Mateusz, Ługowski, Ługowski Szymon, Ługowski Wincenty, Ługowski Wojciech, Ługowski Jan15 persons on 13 hearths
Fifteen persons on thirteen hearths — and so it should be. The card separates the co-holders with semicolons, and in two places joins two persons by the conjunction „i”: „Jana i Fabiana” and „Wojciecha i Jana”. Of such groups there are exactly thirteen and each has „po 1 dymie”, so those two pairs sit two to a hearth. The surname „Ługowskich” stands once, at the end, and refers to them all. „Stanisławowej” is a form derived from the husband's name — a woman whom the card does not name by a forename of her own; I record her literally in the recorded form of the name and do not expand her, and the surname I leave in the masculine plural from the card („Ługowskich” → Ługowski), because in a collective entry only such a form stands here.
the same entry also names: Ługowski Andrzej, Ługowski Antoni, Ługowski Fabian, Ługowski Jan, Ługowski Fabian, Ługowski Jakób, Ługowski Leonard, Ługowski Marcin, Ługowski Mateusz, Ługowski, Ługowski Szymon, Ługowski Wincenty, Ługowski Wojciech, Ługowski Jan15 persons on 13 hearths
Fifteen persons on thirteen hearths — and so it should be. The card separates the co-holders with semicolons, and in two places joins two persons by the conjunction „i”: „Jana i Fabiana” and „Wojciecha i Jana”. Of such groups there are exactly thirteen and each has „po 1 dymie”, so those two pairs sit two to a hearth. The surname „Ługowskich” stands once, at the end, and refers to them all. „Stanisławowej” is a form derived from the husband's name — a woman whom the card does not name by a forename of her own; I record her literally in the recorded form of the name and do not expand her, and the surname I leave in the masculine plural from the card („Ługowskich” → Ługowski), because in a collective entry only such a form stands here.
the same entry also names: Ługowski Andrzej, Ługowski Antoni, Ługowski Fabian, Ługowski Jan, Ługowski Fabian, Ługowski Jakób, Ługowski Leonard, Ługowski Maciej, Ługowski Mateusz, Ługowski, Ługowski Szymon, Ługowski Wincenty, Ługowski Wojciech, Ługowski Jan15 persons on 13 hearths
Fifteen persons on thirteen hearths — and so it should be. The card separates the co-holders with semicolons, and in two places joins two persons by the conjunction „i”: „Jana i Fabiana” and „Wojciecha i Jana”. Of such groups there are exactly thirteen and each has „po 1 dymie”, so those two pairs sit two to a hearth. The surname „Ługowskich” stands once, at the end, and refers to them all. „Stanisławowej” is a form derived from the husband's name — a woman whom the card does not name by a forename of her own; I record her literally in the recorded form of the name and do not expand her, and the surname I leave in the masculine plural from the card („Ługowskich” → Ługowski), because in a collective entry only such a form stands here.
the same entry also names: Ługowski Andrzej, Ługowski Antoni, Ługowski Fabian, Ługowski Jan, Ługowski Fabian, Ługowski Jakób, Ługowski Leonard, Ługowski Maciej, Ługowski Marcin, Ługowski, Ługowski Szymon, Ługowski Wincenty, Ługowski Wojciech, Ługowski Jan15 persons on 13 hearths
Fifteen persons on thirteen hearths — and so it should be. The card separates the co-holders with semicolons, and in two places joins two persons by the conjunction „i”: „Jana i Fabiana” and „Wojciecha i Jana”. Of such groups there are exactly thirteen and each has „po 1 dymie”, so those two pairs sit two to a hearth. The surname „Ługowskich” stands once, at the end, and refers to them all. „Stanisławowej” is a form derived from the husband's name — a woman whom the card does not name by a forename of her own; I record her literally in the recorded form of the name and do not expand her, and the surname I leave in the masculine plural from the card („Ługowskich” → Ługowski), because in a collective entry only such a form stands here.
the same entry also names: Ługowski Andrzej, Ługowski Antoni, Ługowski Fabian, Ługowski Jan, Ługowski Fabian, Ługowski Jakób, Ługowski Leonard, Ługowski Maciej, Ługowski Marcin, Ługowski Mateusz, Ługowski, Ługowski Wincenty, Ługowski Wojciech, Ługowski Jan15 persons on 13 hearths
Fifteen persons on thirteen hearths — and so it should be. The card separates the co-holders with semicolons, and in two places joins two persons by the conjunction „i”: „Jana i Fabiana” and „Wojciecha i Jana”. Of such groups there are exactly thirteen and each has „po 1 dymie”, so those two pairs sit two to a hearth. The surname „Ługowskich” stands once, at the end, and refers to them all. „Stanisławowej” is a form derived from the husband's name — a woman whom the card does not name by a forename of her own; I record her literally in the recorded form of the name and do not expand her, and the surname I leave in the masculine plural from the card („Ługowskich” → Ługowski), because in a collective entry only such a form stands here.
the same entry also names: Ługowski Andrzej, Ługowski Antoni, Ługowski Fabian, Ługowski Jan, Ługowski Fabian, Ługowski Jakób, Ługowski Leonard, Ługowski Maciej, Ługowski Marcin, Ługowski Mateusz, Ługowski, Ługowski Szymon, Ługowski Wojciech, Ługowski Jan15 persons on 13 hearths
Fifteen persons on thirteen hearths — and so it should be. The card separates the co-holders with semicolons, and in two places joins two persons by the conjunction „i”: „Jana i Fabiana” and „Wojciecha i Jana”. Of such groups there are exactly thirteen and each has „po 1 dymie”, so those two pairs sit two to a hearth. The surname „Ługowskich” stands once, at the end, and refers to them all. „Stanisławowej” is a form derived from the husband's name — a woman whom the card does not name by a forename of her own; I record her literally in the recorded form of the name and do not expand her, and the surname I leave in the masculine plural from the card („Ługowskich” → Ługowski), because in a collective entry only such a form stands here.
the same entry also names: Ługowski Andrzej, Ługowski Antoni, Ługowski Fabian, Ługowski Jan, Ługowski Fabian, Ługowski Jakób, Ługowski Leonard, Ługowski Maciej, Ługowski Marcin, Ługowski Mateusz, Ługowski, Ługowski Szymon, Ługowski Wincenty, Ługowski Jan15 persons on 13 hearths
Fifteen persons on thirteen hearths — and so it should be. The card separates the co-holders with semicolons, and in two places joins two persons by the conjunction „i”: „Jana i Fabiana” and „Wojciecha i Jana”. Of such groups there are exactly thirteen and each has „po 1 dymie”, so those two pairs sit two to a hearth. The surname „Ługowskich” stands once, at the end, and refers to them all. „Stanisławowej” is a form derived from the husband's name — a woman whom the card does not name by a forename of her own; I record her literally in the recorded form of the name and do not expand her, and the surname I leave in the masculine plural from the card („Ługowskich” → Ługowski), because in a collective entry only such a form stands here.
the same entry also names: Ługowski Jan, Ługowski Wojciech, Ługowski Stanisław, Ługowski Szymon, Ługowski Maciej, Ługowski Mateusz, Ługowski Jadwiga †, Ługowski Fabjan, Ługowski Antoni, Ługowski Leon, Ługowski Jan, Ługowski Fabjan, Ługowski Wincenty, Ługowski Marcin, Ługowski Jakób16 persons on 14 hearths
Sixteen persons on fourteen hearths, and so it should be: the card separates the joint holders with commas, and joins two pairs with the conjunction „i” — „Jana i Wojciecha” and „Jana i Fabjana” — so these pairs sit two to a hearth. The units come to exactly fourteen. „sukcesorów po Jadwidze” is a unit of its own: Jadwiga is no longer alive (the mark for a deceased person), and her succession holds the hearth; in T90 (card 3), entry H) the same holding stands separately as 1 hearth held by Antoni Borkowski. The figure „14” has been corrected on the card — the four written over an earlier digit [reading uncertain as to what stood underneath]; above the word „Ługowskich” stands a superscript „2” of undetermined meaning. I record the surname in the masculine plural of the card („Ługowskich” → Ługowski), because in a collective entry there is no other form.
the same entry also names: Ługowski Jan, Ługowski Wojciech, Ługowski Stanisław, Ługowski Szymon, Ługowski Maciej, Ługowski Mateusz, Ługowski Jadwiga †, Ługowski Fabjan, Ługowski Leon, Ługowski Jan, Ługowski Fabjan, Ługowski Wincenty, Ługowski Marcin, Ługowski Jakób, Ługowski Andrzej16 persons on 14 hearths
Sixteen persons on fourteen hearths, and so it should be: the card separates the joint holders with commas, and joins two pairs with the conjunction „i” — „Jana i Wojciecha” and „Jana i Fabjana” — so these pairs sit two to a hearth. The units come to exactly fourteen. „sukcesorów po Jadwidze” is a unit of its own: Jadwiga is no longer alive (the mark for a deceased person), and her succession holds the hearth; in T90 (card 3), entry H) the same holding stands separately as 1 hearth held by Antoni Borkowski. The figure „14” has been corrected on the card — the four written over an earlier digit [reading uncertain as to what stood underneath]; above the word „Ługowskich” stands a superscript „2” of undetermined meaning. I record the surname in the masculine plural of the card („Ługowskich” → Ługowski), because in a collective entry there is no other form.
the same entry also names: Ługowski Jan, Ługowski Wojciech, Ługowski Stanisław, Ługowski Szymon, Ługowski Maciej, Ługowski Mateusz, Ługowski Jadwiga †, Ługowski Antoni, Ługowski Leon, Ługowski Jan, Ługowski Fabjan, Ługowski Wincenty, Ługowski Marcin, Ługowski Jakób, Ługowski Andrzej16 persons on 14 hearths
Sixteen persons on fourteen hearths, and so it should be: the card separates the joint holders with commas, and joins two pairs with the conjunction „i” — „Jana i Wojciecha” and „Jana i Fabjana” — so these pairs sit two to a hearth. The units come to exactly fourteen. „sukcesorów po Jadwidze” is a unit of its own: Jadwiga is no longer alive (the mark for a deceased person), and her succession holds the hearth; in T90 (card 3), entry H) the same holding stands separately as 1 hearth held by Antoni Borkowski. The figure „14” has been corrected on the card — the four written over an earlier digit [reading uncertain as to what stood underneath]; above the word „Ługowskich” stands a superscript „2” of undetermined meaning. I record the surname in the masculine plural of the card („Ługowskich” → Ługowski), because in a collective entry there is no other form.
the same entry also names: Ługowski Jan, Ługowski Wojciech, Ługowski Stanisław, Ługowski Szymon, Ługowski Maciej, Ługowski Mateusz, Ługowski Jadwiga †, Ługowski Fabjan, Ługowski Antoni, Ługowski Leon, Ługowski Jan, Ługowski Wincenty, Ługowski Marcin, Ługowski Jakób, Ługowski Andrzej16 persons on 14 hearths
Sixteen persons on fourteen hearths, and so it should be: the card separates the joint holders with commas, and joins two pairs with the conjunction „i” — „Jana i Wojciecha” and „Jana i Fabjana” — so these pairs sit two to a hearth. The units come to exactly fourteen. „sukcesorów po Jadwidze” is a unit of its own: Jadwiga is no longer alive (the mark for a deceased person), and her succession holds the hearth; in T90 (card 3), entry H) the same holding stands separately as 1 hearth held by Antoni Borkowski. The figure „14” has been corrected on the card — the four written over an earlier digit [reading uncertain as to what stood underneath]; above the word „Ługowskich” stands a superscript „2” of undetermined meaning. I record the surname in the masculine plural of the card („Ługowskich” → Ługowski), because in a collective entry there is no other form.
the same entry also names: Ługowski Jan, Ługowski Wojciech, Ługowski Stanisław, Ługowski Szymon, Ługowski Maciej, Ługowski Mateusz, Ługowski Fabjan, Ługowski Antoni, Ługowski Leon, Ługowski Jan, Ługowski Fabjan, Ługowski Wincenty, Ługowski Marcin, Ługowski Jakób, Ługowski Andrzej16 persons on 14 hearths
Sixteen persons on fourteen hearths, and so it should be: the card separates the joint holders with commas, and joins two pairs with the conjunction „i” — „Jana i Wojciecha” and „Jana i Fabjana” — so these pairs sit two to a hearth. The units come to exactly fourteen. „sukcesorów po Jadwidze” is a unit of its own: Jadwiga is no longer alive (the mark for a deceased person), and her succession holds the hearth; in T90 (card 3), entry H) the same holding stands separately as 1 hearth held by Antoni Borkowski. The figure „14” has been corrected on the card — the four written over an earlier digit [reading uncertain as to what stood underneath]; above the word „Ługowskich” stands a superscript „2” of undetermined meaning. I record the surname in the masculine plural of the card („Ługowskich” → Ługowski), because in a collective entry there is no other form.
the same entry also names: Ługowski Jan, Ługowski Wojciech, Ługowski Stanisław, Ługowski Szymon, Ługowski Maciej, Ługowski Mateusz, Ługowski Jadwiga †, Ługowski Fabjan, Ługowski Antoni, Ługowski Leon, Ługowski Jan, Ługowski Fabjan, Ługowski Wincenty, Ługowski Marcin, Ługowski Andrzej16 persons on 14 hearths
Sixteen persons on fourteen hearths, and so it should be: the card separates the joint holders with commas, and joins two pairs with the conjunction „i” — „Jana i Wojciecha” and „Jana i Fabjana” — so these pairs sit two to a hearth. The units come to exactly fourteen. „sukcesorów po Jadwidze” is a unit of its own: Jadwiga is no longer alive (the mark for a deceased person), and her succession holds the hearth; in T90 (card 3), entry H) the same holding stands separately as 1 hearth held by Antoni Borkowski. The figure „14” has been corrected on the card — the four written over an earlier digit [reading uncertain as to what stood underneath]; above the word „Ługowskich” stands a superscript „2” of undetermined meaning. I record the surname in the masculine plural of the card („Ługowskich” → Ługowski), because in a collective entry there is no other form.
the same entry also names: Ługowski Wojciech, Ługowski Stanisław, Ługowski Szymon, Ługowski Maciej, Ługowski Mateusz, Ługowski Jadwiga †, Ługowski Fabjan, Ługowski Antoni, Ługowski Leon, Ługowski Jan, Ługowski Fabjan, Ługowski Wincenty, Ługowski Marcin, Ługowski Jakób, Ługowski Andrzej16 persons on 14 hearths
Sixteen persons on fourteen hearths, and so it should be: the card separates the joint holders with commas, and joins two pairs with the conjunction „i” — „Jana i Wojciecha” and „Jana i Fabjana” — so these pairs sit two to a hearth. The units come to exactly fourteen. „sukcesorów po Jadwidze” is a unit of its own: Jadwiga is no longer alive (the mark for a deceased person), and her succession holds the hearth; in T90 (card 3), entry H) the same holding stands separately as 1 hearth held by Antoni Borkowski. The figure „14” has been corrected on the card — the four written over an earlier digit [reading uncertain as to what stood underneath]; above the word „Ługowskich” stands a superscript „2” of undetermined meaning. I record the surname in the masculine plural of the card („Ługowskich” → Ługowski), because in a collective entry there is no other form.
the same entry also names: Ługowski Jan, Ługowski Wojciech, Ługowski Stanisław, Ługowski Szymon, Ługowski Maciej, Ługowski Mateusz, Ługowski Jadwiga †, Ługowski Fabjan, Ługowski Antoni, Ługowski Leon, Ługowski Fabjan, Ługowski Wincenty, Ługowski Marcin, Ługowski Jakób, Ługowski Andrzej16 persons on 14 hearths
Sixteen persons on fourteen hearths, and so it should be: the card separates the joint holders with commas, and joins two pairs with the conjunction „i” — „Jana i Wojciecha” and „Jana i Fabjana” — so these pairs sit two to a hearth. The units come to exactly fourteen. „sukcesorów po Jadwidze” is a unit of its own: Jadwiga is no longer alive (the mark for a deceased person), and her succession holds the hearth; in T90 (card 3), entry H) the same holding stands separately as 1 hearth held by Antoni Borkowski. The figure „14” has been corrected on the card — the four written over an earlier digit [reading uncertain as to what stood underneath]; above the word „Ługowskich” stands a superscript „2” of undetermined meaning. I record the surname in the masculine plural of the card („Ługowskich” → Ługowski), because in a collective entry there is no other form.
the same entry also names: Ługowski Jan, Ługowski Wojciech, Ługowski Stanisław, Ługowski Szymon, Ługowski Maciej, Ługowski Mateusz, Ługowski Jadwiga †, Ługowski Fabjan, Ługowski Antoni, Ługowski Jan, Ługowski Fabjan, Ługowski Wincenty, Ługowski Marcin, Ługowski Jakób, Ługowski Andrzej16 persons on 14 hearths
Sixteen persons on fourteen hearths, and so it should be: the card separates the joint holders with commas, and joins two pairs with the conjunction „i” — „Jana i Wojciecha” and „Jana i Fabjana” — so these pairs sit two to a hearth. The units come to exactly fourteen. „sukcesorów po Jadwidze” is a unit of its own: Jadwiga is no longer alive (the mark for a deceased person), and her succession holds the hearth; in T90 (card 3), entry H) the same holding stands separately as 1 hearth held by Antoni Borkowski. The figure „14” has been corrected on the card — the four written over an earlier digit [reading uncertain as to what stood underneath]; above the word „Ługowskich” stands a superscript „2” of undetermined meaning. I record the surname in the masculine plural of the card („Ługowskich” → Ługowski), because in a collective entry there is no other form.
the same entry also names: Ługowski Jan, Ługowski Wojciech, Ługowski Stanisław, Ługowski Szymon, Ługowski Mateusz, Ługowski Jadwiga †, Ługowski Fabjan, Ługowski Antoni, Ługowski Leon, Ługowski Jan, Ługowski Fabjan, Ługowski Wincenty, Ługowski Marcin, Ługowski Jakób, Ługowski Andrzej16 persons on 14 hearths
Sixteen persons on fourteen hearths, and so it should be: the card separates the joint holders with commas, and joins two pairs with the conjunction „i” — „Jana i Wojciecha” and „Jana i Fabjana” — so these pairs sit two to a hearth. The units come to exactly fourteen. „sukcesorów po Jadwidze” is a unit of its own: Jadwiga is no longer alive (the mark for a deceased person), and her succession holds the hearth; in T90 (card 3), entry H) the same holding stands separately as 1 hearth held by Antoni Borkowski. The figure „14” has been corrected on the card — the four written over an earlier digit [reading uncertain as to what stood underneath]; above the word „Ługowskich” stands a superscript „2” of undetermined meaning. I record the surname in the masculine plural of the card („Ługowskich” → Ługowski), because in a collective entry there is no other form.
the same entry also names: Ługowski Jan, Ługowski Wojciech, Ługowski Stanisław, Ługowski Szymon, Ługowski Maciej, Ługowski Mateusz, Ługowski Jadwiga †, Ługowski Fabjan, Ługowski Antoni, Ługowski Leon, Ługowski Jan, Ługowski Fabjan, Ługowski Wincenty, Ługowski Jakób, Ługowski Andrzej16 persons on 14 hearths
Sixteen persons on fourteen hearths, and so it should be: the card separates the joint holders with commas, and joins two pairs with the conjunction „i” — „Jana i Wojciecha” and „Jana i Fabjana” — so these pairs sit two to a hearth. The units come to exactly fourteen. „sukcesorów po Jadwidze” is a unit of its own: Jadwiga is no longer alive (the mark for a deceased person), and her succession holds the hearth; in T90 (card 3), entry H) the same holding stands separately as 1 hearth held by Antoni Borkowski. The figure „14” has been corrected on the card — the four written over an earlier digit [reading uncertain as to what stood underneath]; above the word „Ługowskich” stands a superscript „2” of undetermined meaning. I record the surname in the masculine plural of the card („Ługowskich” → Ługowski), because in a collective entry there is no other form.
the same entry also names: Ługowski Jan, Ługowski Wojciech, Ługowski Stanisław, Ługowski Szymon, Ługowski Maciej, Ługowski Jadwiga †, Ługowski Fabjan, Ługowski Antoni, Ługowski Leon, Ługowski Jan, Ługowski Fabjan, Ługowski Wincenty, Ługowski Marcin, Ługowski Jakób, Ługowski Andrzej16 persons on 14 hearths
Sixteen persons on fourteen hearths, and so it should be: the card separates the joint holders with commas, and joins two pairs with the conjunction „i” — „Jana i Wojciecha” and „Jana i Fabjana” — so these pairs sit two to a hearth. The units come to exactly fourteen. „sukcesorów po Jadwidze” is a unit of its own: Jadwiga is no longer alive (the mark for a deceased person), and her succession holds the hearth; in T90 (card 3), entry H) the same holding stands separately as 1 hearth held by Antoni Borkowski. The figure „14” has been corrected on the card — the four written over an earlier digit [reading uncertain as to what stood underneath]; above the word „Ługowskich” stands a superscript „2” of undetermined meaning. I record the surname in the masculine plural of the card („Ługowskich” → Ługowski), because in a collective entry there is no other form.
the same entry also names: Ługowski Jan, Ługowski Wojciech, Ługowski Szymon, Ługowski Maciej, Ługowski Mateusz, Ługowski Jadwiga †, Ługowski Fabjan, Ługowski Antoni, Ługowski Leon, Ługowski Jan, Ługowski Fabjan, Ługowski Wincenty, Ługowski Marcin, Ługowski Jakób, Ługowski Andrzej16 persons on 14 hearths
Sixteen persons on fourteen hearths, and so it should be: the card separates the joint holders with commas, and joins two pairs with the conjunction „i” — „Jana i Wojciecha” and „Jana i Fabjana” — so these pairs sit two to a hearth. The units come to exactly fourteen. „sukcesorów po Jadwidze” is a unit of its own: Jadwiga is no longer alive (the mark for a deceased person), and her succession holds the hearth; in T90 (card 3), entry H) the same holding stands separately as 1 hearth held by Antoni Borkowski. The figure „14” has been corrected on the card — the four written over an earlier digit [reading uncertain as to what stood underneath]; above the word „Ługowskich” stands a superscript „2” of undetermined meaning. I record the surname in the masculine plural of the card („Ługowskich” → Ługowski), because in a collective entry there is no other form.
the same entry also names: Ługowski Jan, Ługowski Wojciech, Ługowski Stanisław, Ługowski Maciej, Ługowski Mateusz, Ługowski Jadwiga †, Ługowski Fabjan, Ługowski Antoni, Ługowski Leon, Ługowski Jan, Ługowski Fabjan, Ługowski Wincenty, Ługowski Marcin, Ługowski Jakób, Ługowski Andrzej16 persons on 14 hearths
Sixteen persons on fourteen hearths, and so it should be: the card separates the joint holders with commas, and joins two pairs with the conjunction „i” — „Jana i Wojciecha” and „Jana i Fabjana” — so these pairs sit two to a hearth. The units come to exactly fourteen. „sukcesorów po Jadwidze” is a unit of its own: Jadwiga is no longer alive (the mark for a deceased person), and her succession holds the hearth; in T90 (card 3), entry H) the same holding stands separately as 1 hearth held by Antoni Borkowski. The figure „14” has been corrected on the card — the four written over an earlier digit [reading uncertain as to what stood underneath]; above the word „Ługowskich” stands a superscript „2” of undetermined meaning. I record the surname in the masculine plural of the card („Ługowskich” → Ługowski), because in a collective entry there is no other form.
the same entry also names: Ługowski Jan, Ługowski Wojciech, Ługowski Stanisław, Ługowski Szymon, Ługowski Maciej, Ługowski Mateusz, Ługowski Jadwiga †, Ługowski Fabjan, Ługowski Antoni, Ługowski Leon, Ługowski Jan, Ługowski Fabjan, Ługowski Marcin, Ługowski Jakób, Ługowski Andrzej16 persons on 14 hearths
Sixteen persons on fourteen hearths, and so it should be: the card separates the joint holders with commas, and joins two pairs with the conjunction „i” — „Jana i Wojciecha” and „Jana i Fabjana” — so these pairs sit two to a hearth. The units come to exactly fourteen. „sukcesorów po Jadwidze” is a unit of its own: Jadwiga is no longer alive (the mark for a deceased person), and her succession holds the hearth; in T90 (card 3), entry H) the same holding stands separately as 1 hearth held by Antoni Borkowski. The figure „14” has been corrected on the card — the four written over an earlier digit [reading uncertain as to what stood underneath]; above the word „Ługowskich” stands a superscript „2” of undetermined meaning. I record the surname in the masculine plural of the card („Ługowskich” → Ługowski), because in a collective entry there is no other form.
the same entry also names: Ługowski Jan, Ługowski Stanisław, Ługowski Szymon, Ługowski Maciej, Ługowski Mateusz, Ługowski Jadwiga †, Ługowski Fabjan, Ługowski Antoni, Ługowski Leon, Ługowski Jan, Ługowski Fabjan, Ługowski Wincenty, Ługowski Marcin, Ługowski Jakób, Ługowski Andrzej16 persons on 14 hearths
Sixteen persons on fourteen hearths, and so it should be: the card separates the joint holders with commas, and joins two pairs with the conjunction „i” — „Jana i Wojciecha” and „Jana i Fabjana” — so these pairs sit two to a hearth. The units come to exactly fourteen. „sukcesorów po Jadwidze” is a unit of its own: Jadwiga is no longer alive (the mark for a deceased person), and her succession holds the hearth; in T90 (card 3), entry H) the same holding stands separately as 1 hearth held by Antoni Borkowski. The figure „14” has been corrected on the card — the four written over an earlier digit [reading uncertain as to what stood underneath]; above the word „Ługowskich” stands a superscript „2” of undetermined meaning. I record the surname in the masculine plural of the card („Ługowskich” → Ługowski), because in a collective entry there is no other form.
OlędyZbuczyn parish
the same entry also names: Wielgórski Józef †2 persons on a holding without hearths
The word denoting the successors is CONTRACTED on this card: five characters with a horizontal abbreviation stroke above them; I read „sukc[esor]ów” [reading uncertain as to the letters, certain as to the sense — the remaining three sigla have at this point „sukces.” (T90), „sukc.” (T89), and the full „sukcessorów” (T94)]. „zaprzys.” = took the oath; the oath was sworn by Walenty Ługowski, the card calls him neither possessor nor guardian, so I confine the status to „took the oath” (as on cards, 184, 263, 344, 363). THE SURNAME DIFFERS FOR A THIRD TIME: here „Wielgórskiego” (with „ó”), in T89 and T94 „Wielgorskiego” (with „o”), in T90 „Wielgurskiego” (with „u”) — three forms in one village; I do not merge them.
RadomyślZbuczyn parish
The forename on the card is abbreviated „Bar.”; the genitive form of the surname is masculine, so this concerns a man (Bartłomiej / Bartosz?), but the card does not settle it — I do not expand the abbreviation.
RzązewZbuczyn parish
the same entry also names: Ługowski Maciej, Radzikowski Ludwik3 persons on 2 hearths
two Maciej Ługowskis at 1 hearth each; Ludwik Radzikowski is named as the man from whom the holding was bought — he has no hearth, hence 3 persons against 2 hearths. T94 (card 7): „cz. Macieja, Macieja po Ludwiku Radzikowskim, Ługowskich – po 1 dymie – 2 d.”
the same entry also names: Ługowski Maciej, Radzikowski Ludwik3 persons on 2 hearths
two Maciej Ługowskis at 1 hearth each; Ludwik Radzikowski is named as the man from whom the holding was bought — he has no hearth, hence 3 persons against 2 hearths. T94 (card 7): „cz. Macieja, Macieja po Ludwiku Radzikowskim, Ługowskich – po 1 dymie – 2 d.”
the same entry also names: Ługowski Maciej2 persons on 2 hearths
two Maciej Ługowskis, at 1 hearth each. Ludwik Radzikowski is named only as the previous possessor of the holding — I do not draw him into the list of persons (just as with „po Pawle”, „po Antonim” on other cards); [left to the decision of the owner]
the same entry also names: Ługowski Maciej2 persons on 2 hearths
two Maciej Ługowskis, at 1 hearth each. Ludwik Radzikowski is named only as the previous possessor of the holding — I do not draw him into the list of persons (just as with „po Pawle”, „po Antonim” on other cards); [left to the decision of the owner]
the card adds „po Ludwiku Radzikowskim”
ZdanyZbuczyn parish
This surname in full edition of the hearth-tax registers — together with the search across all persons, the comparison of figures through the registers, the modern map and the Perthées engraving of 1786.
