Skip to content
Let us seek what unites us, and avoid what divides us
The Jasiński Family of JasionkaThe Łuków Land·Zbuczyn parish
PL

Home › Castle court records / Old sources › The hearth-tax registers 1775–1794 › Ługi Wielkie

Hearth Tax Registers of the Łuków Land 1775–1794

Ługi Wielkie

Parish of Zbuczyn, łukowski county.

Dear reader, remember that this is an AI study, that it may contain errors; treat it as indicative and verify it for yourself.

Offices: Drohojewski (dean of Łuków (dziekan łukowski), parish priest of Siedlce (proboszcz siedlecki) · parish priest of Siedlce (proboszcz siedlecki)); Drohojewski Antoni (parish priest of Siedlce); Katemberk (parish priest of Siedlce)

Propination, inns, breweries: Drohojewski (brewery, inn); Drohojewski Antoni (propination)

spellings on the cards: Ługi Wielkie, Ługi wielkie

district of łukowski · parish of Zbuczyn · cards 1), 2), 3), 4), 5), 6)

Ługi Wielkie — noble holdings, the largest holding that of the priest Drochojewski, dean of Łuków, parish priest of Siedlce [O83 (IX)]

Population 1787
81
of whom Christians
76
of whom Jews
5
persons per hearth
3.5
YearSourceEntriesHearths
T75Hearth tax register 17751224
T89Hearth tax register 1789723
T90Hearth tax register 1790923
T94Hearth tax register 1794823
Caveats on the years' registers (5)

What the compiler noted beside the entry itself, and what the table above does not show:

  • T75 — T75 begins on card 1 (card 1), entries 1–6) and runs on onto card 2 (card 2) as „T75. – c. d.” (entries 7–11). Card 1 gives no total; card 2 gives two totals. The first — „Razem dymów 23” — covers eleven noble entries (10+3+1+1+1+2 from card 1) = 18, plus 1+1+1+1+1 from card 2) = 5, 23 in all) and agrees to the single hearth. Beneath it the card adds separately „Do probostwa Świdlickiego (Siedleckiego,) należy w tejże wsi – dym 1”, and in the margin, in a drawn frame, a second total: „razem 24”. As the total from the card I take that final one, 24, because it covers all the recorded entries, the rectory (probostwo) included — and that is exactly what the entries of this file give. In the course of tidying the card the entry „9) cz. do probostwa Świdlickiego (Siedleckiego) dym 1” was struck out and the three following ones renumbered (10→9, 11→10, 12→11); the same hearth returns lower down in a separate line about the rectory, so I count it once, in the `probostwo` entry.
  • T89 — The whole register of 1789 fits on a single card (card 4), written in pencil/light ink, in a hand other than that of cards 1–2. The entries are not numbered on the card — I number them in the order in which they are written. The card's total: „razem 23 d.” (doubly underlined); 2 + 15 + 1 + 1 + 2 + 1 + 1 = 23, it agrees. The same figure of 23 comes out in T90 — two registers from neighbouring years give the same number of hearths.
  • T₀89 — A list of possessors of holdings of 1789; the siglum is a looped T with the index 0 (T₀89), checked under magnification — not „Po99”, and not the same as the plain T89, which for this village stands separately on card 4 (card 4). Without hearths, hence `dymy: null` throughout, and without a total. The card is set out in TWO COLUMNS separated by a vertical stroke; I transcribe first the whole left-hand column (nos. „L1”–„L11”), then the right-hand one (nos. „P1”–„P12”), because the card does not indicate which is to be read first. The two upper lines of the right-hand column stand above a horizontal stroke, the rest below it. 23 entries in all. A footnote is at work on the card: the index „1)” stands beside „Wawrzeńca Chromińskiego” (L1) and beside „Żurowszczyzna zastawna Wawrzeńcowi Chromińskiemu” (P3), and at the foot of the card the explanation „1) ten sam” — that is, both entries concern one and the same man.
  • T90 — T90 begins at the foot of card 2 (card 2), entries A–D) and runs on onto card 3 (card 3) as „c.d. T90” (entries E–I). The numbers of hearths stand in a separate column on the right: beside entry A the full description „2 dymy wiejskie 2giej klasy”, below it repetition marks (quotation marks). The card's total stands on card 3): „Razem – 23 dymów wiejskich 2giej klasy” (the figure doubly underlined). 2+1+1+1+1+1+2+1+13 = 23 — it agrees. Card 2 (card 2) is written in black ink, card 3 (card 3) in blue and in another, steeper hand; it is the same T90 section, and the continuity is secured by the addition „c.d.”.
  • T94 — The whole register of 1794 fits on a single card (card 5). The entries are not numbered — I number them in the order in which they are written. The card's total: „Razem 23 dymy” (doubly underlined); 2 + 1 + 14 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 2 + 1 = 23, it agrees. The sequence of entries corresponds entry for entry to the T90 of cards 2)–299 (there too 23 hearths), with this difference, that T94 joins into one entry what T90 divides into H (the successors of Jadwiga, 1 hearth) and I (the Ługowskis, 13 hearths) — hence 14 hearths here.

The card-index entries

Every extract for this locality in the wording of the cards, year by year. One block is one occurrence: this person, in this year. At a collective item the same card text stands beside every person named — because the card names them together and they must not be separated. The hearths given at a collective item are an equal division among those named, not a reading.

1775 T75Hearth tax register 1775

ŁugowskiAndrzej«Wyszek»
T7510 · each 11) cz. Macieja Krolika, Stanisława Krolika, Antoniego Kępia, Marcina Wyzka, 2 Andrzejów Wyszków, ~~Bart. Krolika~~, Leonarda Kępia, Łukasza Wyżka, Jana, Szymona Panoszka² — Ługowskich po 1 dymie — dymów 10card 1)

the same entry also names: Ługowski Maciej «Krolik», Ługowski Stanisław «Krolik», Ługowski Antoni «Kępia», Ługowski Marcin «Wyszek», Ługowski Andrzej «Wyszek», Ługowski Leonard «Kępia», Ługowski Łukasz «Wyszek», Ługowski Jan «Panoszek», Ługowski Szymon «Panoszek»10 persons on 10 hearths

A collective entry: the surname „Ługowskich” stands once, at the end, and beside each person stands a byname. „Bart. Krolika” is STRUCK OUT on the card and does not enter the ten persons — the same Bartłomiej has an entry of his own, 2 (3 hearths); I do not count the struck-out name in, so as not to count him twice. Without him it comes to exactly 10 persons on 10 hearths. Above „Panoszka” stands a superscript „2” — I read it as a sign that the byname refers to both of the preceding forenames (Jan and Szymon) [reading uncertain]. The spelling of the byname Wyszek differs three times over on this one card: „Wyzka” (Marcin), „Wyszków” (the 2 Andrzejs), „Wyżka” with a dot over the z (Łukasz) — I do not smooth it out; in the text of the extract it stands as it does on the card. The nominatives of the bynames „Wyszek” and „Panoszek” are a reconstruction from the genitive, the card gives only oblique forms [reading uncertain]; the byname „Kępia” I leave in the form from the card, because the nominative cannot be restored unambiguously (Kęp? Kępa?).
ŁugowskiAndrzej«Wyszek»
T7510 · each 11) cz. Macieja Krolika, Stanisława Krolika, Antoniego Kępia, Marcina Wyzka, 2 Andrzejów Wyszków, ~~Bart. Krolika~~, Leonarda Kępia, Łukasza Wyżka, Jana, Szymona Panoszka² — Ługowskich po 1 dymie — dymów 10card 1)

the same entry also names: Ługowski Maciej «Krolik», Ługowski Stanisław «Krolik», Ługowski Antoni «Kępia», Ługowski Marcin «Wyszek», Ługowski Andrzej «Wyszek», Ługowski Leonard «Kępia», Ługowski Łukasz «Wyszek», Ługowski Jan «Panoszek», Ługowski Szymon «Panoszek»10 persons on 10 hearths

A collective entry: the surname „Ługowskich” stands once, at the end, and beside each person stands a byname. „Bart. Krolika” is STRUCK OUT on the card and does not enter the ten persons — the same Bartłomiej has an entry of his own, 2 (3 hearths); I do not count the struck-out name in, so as not to count him twice. Without him it comes to exactly 10 persons on 10 hearths. Above „Panoszka” stands a superscript „2” — I read it as a sign that the byname refers to both of the preceding forenames (Jan and Szymon) [reading uncertain]. The spelling of the byname Wyszek differs three times over on this one card: „Wyzka” (Marcin), „Wyszków” (the 2 Andrzejs), „Wyżka” with a dot over the z (Łukasz) — I do not smooth it out; in the text of the extract it stands as it does on the card. The nominatives of the bynames „Wyszek” and „Panoszek” are a reconstruction from the genitive, the card gives only oblique forms [reading uncertain]; the byname „Kępia” I leave in the form from the card, because the nominative cannot be restored unambiguously (Kęp? Kępa?).
ŁugowskiAntoni«Kępia»
T7510 · each 11) cz. Macieja Krolika, Stanisława Krolika, Antoniego Kępia, Marcina Wyzka, 2 Andrzejów Wyszków, ~~Bart. Krolika~~, Leonarda Kępia, Łukasza Wyżka, Jana, Szymona Panoszka² — Ługowskich po 1 dymie — dymów 10card 1)

the same entry also names: Ługowski Maciej «Krolik», Ługowski Stanisław «Krolik», Ługowski Marcin «Wyszek», Ługowski Andrzej «Wyszek», Ługowski Andrzej «Wyszek», Ługowski Leonard «Kępia», Ługowski Łukasz «Wyszek», Ługowski Jan «Panoszek», Ługowski Szymon «Panoszek»10 persons on 10 hearths

A collective entry: the surname „Ługowskich” stands once, at the end, and beside each person stands a byname. „Bart. Krolika” is STRUCK OUT on the card and does not enter the ten persons — the same Bartłomiej has an entry of his own, 2 (3 hearths); I do not count the struck-out name in, so as not to count him twice. Without him it comes to exactly 10 persons on 10 hearths. Above „Panoszka” stands a superscript „2” — I read it as a sign that the byname refers to both of the preceding forenames (Jan and Szymon) [reading uncertain]. The spelling of the byname Wyszek differs three times over on this one card: „Wyzka” (Marcin), „Wyszków” (the 2 Andrzejs), „Wyżka” with a dot over the z (Łukasz) — I do not smooth it out; in the text of the extract it stands as it does on the card. The nominatives of the bynames „Wyszek” and „Panoszek” are a reconstruction from the genitive, the card gives only oblique forms [reading uncertain]; the byname „Kępia” I leave in the form from the card, because the nominative cannot be restored unambiguously (Kęp? Kępa?).
ŁugowskiJan«Panoszek»
T7510 · each 11) cz. Macieja Krolika, Stanisława Krolika, Antoniego Kępia, Marcina Wyzka, 2 Andrzejów Wyszków, ~~Bart. Krolika~~, Leonarda Kępia, Łukasza Wyżka, Jana, Szymona Panoszka² — Ługowskich po 1 dymie — dymów 10card 1)

the same entry also names: Ługowski Maciej «Krolik», Ługowski Stanisław «Krolik», Ługowski Antoni «Kępia», Ługowski Marcin «Wyszek», Ługowski Andrzej «Wyszek», Ługowski Andrzej «Wyszek», Ługowski Leonard «Kępia», Ługowski Łukasz «Wyszek», Ługowski Szymon «Panoszek»10 persons on 10 hearths

A collective entry: the surname „Ługowskich” stands once, at the end, and beside each person stands a byname. „Bart. Krolika” is STRUCK OUT on the card and does not enter the ten persons — the same Bartłomiej has an entry of his own, 2 (3 hearths); I do not count the struck-out name in, so as not to count him twice. Without him it comes to exactly 10 persons on 10 hearths. Above „Panoszka” stands a superscript „2” — I read it as a sign that the byname refers to both of the preceding forenames (Jan and Szymon) [reading uncertain]. The spelling of the byname Wyszek differs three times over on this one card: „Wyzka” (Marcin), „Wyszków” (the 2 Andrzejs), „Wyżka” with a dot over the z (Łukasz) — I do not smooth it out; in the text of the extract it stands as it does on the card. The nominatives of the bynames „Wyszek” and „Panoszek” are a reconstruction from the genitive, the card gives only oblique forms [reading uncertain]; the byname „Kępia” I leave in the form from the card, because the nominative cannot be restored unambiguously (Kęp? Kępa?).
ŁugowskiLeonard«Kępia»
T7510 · each 11) cz. Macieja Krolika, Stanisława Krolika, Antoniego Kępia, Marcina Wyzka, 2 Andrzejów Wyszków, ~~Bart. Krolika~~, Leonarda Kępia, Łukasza Wyżka, Jana, Szymona Panoszka² — Ługowskich po 1 dymie — dymów 10card 1)

the same entry also names: Ługowski Maciej «Krolik», Ługowski Stanisław «Krolik», Ługowski Antoni «Kępia», Ługowski Marcin «Wyszek», Ługowski Andrzej «Wyszek», Ługowski Andrzej «Wyszek», Ługowski Łukasz «Wyszek», Ługowski Jan «Panoszek», Ługowski Szymon «Panoszek»10 persons on 10 hearths

A collective entry: the surname „Ługowskich” stands once, at the end, and beside each person stands a byname. „Bart. Krolika” is STRUCK OUT on the card and does not enter the ten persons — the same Bartłomiej has an entry of his own, 2 (3 hearths); I do not count the struck-out name in, so as not to count him twice. Without him it comes to exactly 10 persons on 10 hearths. Above „Panoszka” stands a superscript „2” — I read it as a sign that the byname refers to both of the preceding forenames (Jan and Szymon) [reading uncertain]. The spelling of the byname Wyszek differs three times over on this one card: „Wyzka” (Marcin), „Wyszków” (the 2 Andrzejs), „Wyżka” with a dot over the z (Łukasz) — I do not smooth it out; in the text of the extract it stands as it does on the card. The nominatives of the bynames „Wyszek” and „Panoszek” are a reconstruction from the genitive, the card gives only oblique forms [reading uncertain]; the byname „Kępia” I leave in the form from the card, because the nominative cannot be restored unambiguously (Kęp? Kępa?).
ŁugowskiŁukasz«Wyszek»
T7510 · each 11) cz. Macieja Krolika, Stanisława Krolika, Antoniego Kępia, Marcina Wyzka, 2 Andrzejów Wyszków, ~~Bart. Krolika~~, Leonarda Kępia, Łukasza Wyżka, Jana, Szymona Panoszka² — Ługowskich po 1 dymie — dymów 10card 1)

the same entry also names: Ługowski Maciej «Krolik», Ługowski Stanisław «Krolik», Ługowski Antoni «Kępia», Ługowski Marcin «Wyszek», Ługowski Andrzej «Wyszek», Ługowski Andrzej «Wyszek», Ługowski Leonard «Kępia», Ługowski Jan «Panoszek», Ługowski Szymon «Panoszek»10 persons on 10 hearths

A collective entry: the surname „Ługowskich” stands once, at the end, and beside each person stands a byname. „Bart. Krolika” is STRUCK OUT on the card and does not enter the ten persons — the same Bartłomiej has an entry of his own, 2 (3 hearths); I do not count the struck-out name in, so as not to count him twice. Without him it comes to exactly 10 persons on 10 hearths. Above „Panoszka” stands a superscript „2” — I read it as a sign that the byname refers to both of the preceding forenames (Jan and Szymon) [reading uncertain]. The spelling of the byname Wyszek differs three times over on this one card: „Wyzka” (Marcin), „Wyszków” (the 2 Andrzejs), „Wyżka” with a dot over the z (Łukasz) — I do not smooth it out; in the text of the extract it stands as it does on the card. The nominatives of the bynames „Wyszek” and „Panoszek” are a reconstruction from the genitive, the card gives only oblique forms [reading uncertain]; the byname „Kępia” I leave in the form from the card, because the nominative cannot be restored unambiguously (Kęp? Kępa?).
ŁugowskiMaciej«Krolik»
T7510 · each 11) cz. Macieja Krolika, Stanisława Krolika, Antoniego Kępia, Marcina Wyzka, 2 Andrzejów Wyszków, ~~Bart. Krolika~~, Leonarda Kępia, Łukasza Wyżka, Jana, Szymona Panoszka² — Ługowskich po 1 dymie — dymów 10card 1)

the same entry also names: Ługowski Stanisław «Krolik», Ługowski Antoni «Kępia», Ługowski Marcin «Wyszek», Ługowski Andrzej «Wyszek», Ługowski Andrzej «Wyszek», Ługowski Leonard «Kępia», Ługowski Łukasz «Wyszek», Ługowski Jan «Panoszek», Ługowski Szymon «Panoszek»10 persons on 10 hearths

A collective entry: the surname „Ługowskich” stands once, at the end, and beside each person stands a byname. „Bart. Krolika” is STRUCK OUT on the card and does not enter the ten persons — the same Bartłomiej has an entry of his own, 2 (3 hearths); I do not count the struck-out name in, so as not to count him twice. Without him it comes to exactly 10 persons on 10 hearths. Above „Panoszka” stands a superscript „2” — I read it as a sign that the byname refers to both of the preceding forenames (Jan and Szymon) [reading uncertain]. The spelling of the byname Wyszek differs three times over on this one card: „Wyzka” (Marcin), „Wyszków” (the 2 Andrzejs), „Wyżka” with a dot over the z (Łukasz) — I do not smooth it out; in the text of the extract it stands as it does on the card. The nominatives of the bynames „Wyszek” and „Panoszek” are a reconstruction from the genitive, the card gives only oblique forms [reading uncertain]; the byname „Kępia” I leave in the form from the card, because the nominative cannot be restored unambiguously (Kęp? Kępa?).
ŁugowskiMarcin«Wyszek»
T7510 · each 11) cz. Macieja Krolika, Stanisława Krolika, Antoniego Kępia, Marcina Wyzka, 2 Andrzejów Wyszków, ~~Bart. Krolika~~, Leonarda Kępia, Łukasza Wyżka, Jana, Szymona Panoszka² — Ługowskich po 1 dymie — dymów 10card 1)

the same entry also names: Ługowski Maciej «Krolik», Ługowski Stanisław «Krolik», Ługowski Antoni «Kępia», Ługowski Andrzej «Wyszek», Ługowski Andrzej «Wyszek», Ługowski Leonard «Kępia», Ługowski Łukasz «Wyszek», Ługowski Jan «Panoszek», Ługowski Szymon «Panoszek»10 persons on 10 hearths

A collective entry: the surname „Ługowskich” stands once, at the end, and beside each person stands a byname. „Bart. Krolika” is STRUCK OUT on the card and does not enter the ten persons — the same Bartłomiej has an entry of his own, 2 (3 hearths); I do not count the struck-out name in, so as not to count him twice. Without him it comes to exactly 10 persons on 10 hearths. Above „Panoszka” stands a superscript „2” — I read it as a sign that the byname refers to both of the preceding forenames (Jan and Szymon) [reading uncertain]. The spelling of the byname Wyszek differs three times over on this one card: „Wyzka” (Marcin), „Wyszków” (the 2 Andrzejs), „Wyżka” with a dot over the z (Łukasz) — I do not smooth it out; in the text of the extract it stands as it does on the card. The nominatives of the bynames „Wyszek” and „Panoszek” are a reconstruction from the genitive, the card gives only oblique forms [reading uncertain]; the byname „Kępia” I leave in the form from the card, because the nominative cannot be restored unambiguously (Kęp? Kępa?).
ŁugowskiStanisław«Krolik»
T7510 · each 11) cz. Macieja Krolika, Stanisława Krolika, Antoniego Kępia, Marcina Wyzka, 2 Andrzejów Wyszków, ~~Bart. Krolika~~, Leonarda Kępia, Łukasza Wyżka, Jana, Szymona Panoszka² — Ługowskich po 1 dymie — dymów 10card 1)

the same entry also names: Ługowski Maciej «Krolik», Ługowski Antoni «Kępia», Ługowski Marcin «Wyszek», Ługowski Andrzej «Wyszek», Ługowski Andrzej «Wyszek», Ługowski Leonard «Kępia», Ługowski Łukasz «Wyszek», Ługowski Jan «Panoszek», Ługowski Szymon «Panoszek»10 persons on 10 hearths

A collective entry: the surname „Ługowskich” stands once, at the end, and beside each person stands a byname. „Bart. Krolika” is STRUCK OUT on the card and does not enter the ten persons — the same Bartłomiej has an entry of his own, 2 (3 hearths); I do not count the struck-out name in, so as not to count him twice. Without him it comes to exactly 10 persons on 10 hearths. Above „Panoszka” stands a superscript „2” — I read it as a sign that the byname refers to both of the preceding forenames (Jan and Szymon) [reading uncertain]. The spelling of the byname Wyszek differs three times over on this one card: „Wyzka” (Marcin), „Wyszków” (the 2 Andrzejs), „Wyżka” with a dot over the z (Łukasz) — I do not smooth it out; in the text of the extract it stands as it does on the card. The nominatives of the bynames „Wyszek” and „Panoszek” are a reconstruction from the genitive, the card gives only oblique forms [reading uncertain]; the byname „Kępia” I leave in the form from the card, because the nominative cannot be restored unambiguously (Kęp? Kępa?).
ŁugowskiSzymon«Panoszek»
T7510 · each 11) cz. Macieja Krolika, Stanisława Krolika, Antoniego Kępia, Marcina Wyzka, 2 Andrzejów Wyszków, ~~Bart. Krolika~~, Leonarda Kępia, Łukasza Wyżka, Jana, Szymona Panoszka² — Ługowskich po 1 dymie — dymów 10card 1)

the same entry also names: Ługowski Maciej «Krolik», Ługowski Stanisław «Krolik», Ługowski Antoni «Kępia», Ługowski Marcin «Wyszek», Ługowski Andrzej «Wyszek», Ługowski Andrzej «Wyszek», Ługowski Leonard «Kępia», Ługowski Łukasz «Wyszek», Ługowski Jan «Panoszek»10 persons on 10 hearths

A collective entry: the surname „Ługowskich” stands once, at the end, and beside each person stands a byname. „Bart. Krolika” is STRUCK OUT on the card and does not enter the ten persons — the same Bartłomiej has an entry of his own, 2 (3 hearths); I do not count the struck-out name in, so as not to count him twice. Without him it comes to exactly 10 persons on 10 hearths. Above „Panoszka” stands a superscript „2” — I read it as a sign that the byname refers to both of the preceding forenames (Jan and Szymon) [reading uncertain]. The spelling of the byname Wyszek differs three times over on this one card: „Wyzka” (Marcin), „Wyszków” (the 2 Andrzejs), „Wyżka” with a dot over the z (Łukasz) — I do not smooth it out; in the text of the extract it stands as it does on the card. The nominatives of the bynames „Wyszek” and „Panoszek” are a reconstruction from the genitive, the card gives only oblique forms [reading uncertain]; the byname „Kępia” I leave in the form from the card, because the nominative cannot be restored unambiguously (Kęp? Kępa?).
ŁugowskiBartłomiej«Krolik»
T753 hearths2) cz. Bart. Krolika Ługowskiego dymów 3card 1)

The same person whom the card struck out of entry 1. The abbreviation „Bart.” expanded as Bartłomiej.

TchórzewskiJózef
T751 hearth3) cz. Józefa Thorewskiego dym 1card 1)
The surname „Thorewskiego” — read under high magnification: after „Tho” a clear „r”, then „e-w-skiego”. In T90, entry F (card 3), the same Józef is called „Tchorzewskiego”, so it is almost certain that one person is meant and the surname Tchórzewski, written on card 1) without the „c” and without the „z”. I do not merge this on my own — the wording of the card stands, the matter to be resolved by the owner of the card index.
ŻurawskiAntoni
T751 hearth4) cz. ~~Andrzeja~~ Antoniego Żurawskiego dym 1card 1)

The forename has been corrected on the card: „Andrzeja” struck out, „Antoniego” added above the line. I accept the correction (Antoni), the original wording remaining in the text of the extract.

ChromińskiAndrzej
T751 hearth5) cz. Andrzeja Chromińskiego dym 1card 1)
StruśJoachim
T752 · each 16) cz. Joachima i Józefa Strusów po 1 dymie – dymów 2card 1)

the same entry also names: Struś Józef2 persons on 2 hearths

StruśJózef
T752 · each 16) cz. Joachima i Józefa Strusów po 1 dymie – dymów 2card 1)

the same entry also names: Struś Joachim2 persons on 2 hearths

JezowskiMateusz
T751 hearth10) [pierwotnie 11)] cz. Mateusza Jezowskiego dym 1card 2)

The number was corrected on the card after the entry concerning the parish benefice (probostwo) had been struck out. The surname „Jezowskiego” — I do not see a dot over the „z”, so I do not add one myself; „Jeżowski” is possible [reading uncertain].

SkwirczyńskiJakub
T751 hearth11) [pierwotnie 12)] cz. Świerczyńskiego Jakóba dym 1card 2)

The number was corrected on the card after the entry concerning the parish benefice (probostwo) had been struck out. The card sets the surname before the forename.

Ziemiakowa„Jakóbowej Ziemiakowej”
T751 hearthT75. – c. d. 7) część Jakóbowej Ziemiakowej dym 1card 2)
A woman: the card gives no forename of her own, only two husband-derived forms side by side — „Jakóbowej” (from the husband's forename) and „Ziemiakowej” (from the husband's surname/byname). I record them literally in the recorded form of the name, I leave the given name empty and expand nothing. The surname is given in the feminine form from the card; the masculine base would run „Ziemiak”, but the card does not give it in that form.
BorkowskiAntoni
T751 hearth8) cz. Antoniego Borkowskiego dym 1card 2)
JastrzębskiAntoni
T751 hearth9) [pierwotnie 10)] cz. Antoniego Jastrzebskiego dym 1card 2)

The number was corrected on the card from 10 to 9 after the entry concerning the parish benefice (probostwo) had been struck out. The card writes „Jastrzebskiego” (without an ogonek); I harmonise it to Jastrzębski.

1789 T89Hearth tax register 1789

Drohojewskiparish priest of Siedlce (proboszcz siedlecki)dean of Łuków (dziekan łukowski), parish priest of Siedlce (proboszcz siedlecki)
T892 hearths1 brewery, 1 innpriest (ksiądz)T89 — cz. X. Drohoiewskiego proboszcza siedleckiego: brow., karcz., = 2 d.card 4)

A cleric („X.” = ksiądz, priest), without a forename. This card writes the surname „Drohoiewskiego” (a bare „h”), O83 on card 3) — „Drochojewskiego” (with „ch”); I do not harmonise the spellings. The buildings: 1 brewery + 1 inn = 2 d., it agrees.

Ługowski
T8915 · share of 0.8314 manor house, 1 cottagebrothercz. Andrzeja, Jakuba, Wojciecha z bratem, Antoniego, Wincentego, Jadwigi, Mateusza, Leonarda, Marcina, Fabjana i Wojciecha (1 d.), Szymona, Macieja, Szczepana, Jana i Fabjana (1 d.), sukc. Jadwigi (chał. ~~[słowo skreślone]~~ bez ogrod.) — Ługowskich (każde po 1 dworze, prócz ~~za~~ suk. Jadwigi) = 15 d.card 4)

the same entry also names: Ługowski Andrzej, Ługowski Jakub, Ługowski Wojciech, Ługowski Antoni, Ługowski Wincenty, Ługowski Jadwiga, Ługowski Mateusz, Ługowski Leonard, Ługowski Marcin, Ługowski Fabjan, Ługowski Wojciech, Ługowski Szymon, Ługowski Maciej, Ługowski Szczepan, Ługowski Jan, Ługowski Fabjan, Ługowski Jadwiga †18 persons on 15 hearths

Eighteen persons on fifteen hearths, and so it should be: the card itself joins three groups of two persons on one hearth — „Wojciecha z bratem”, „Fabjana i Wojciecha (1 d.)”, „Jana i Fabjana (1 d.)”. The units come to exactly fifteen. The brother of Wojciech without a forename. The buildings: the card writes „każde po 1 dworze, prócz suk. Jadwigi”, and beside the successors of Jadwiga „chał. bez ogrod.” — hence 14 manor houses + 1 cottage (chałupa) = 15 d. Above a struck-out word in that bracket „bez” was added; after „prócz” a short word is struck out („za”?) [reading uncertain]. NOTE: the forename of Jadwiga stands in this entry TWICE — once among the living co-holders (with a manor house), once at the end as „sukc. Jadwigi” (with a cottage). I transcribe it as it stands; whether these are two different women or a slip of the copyist, the card does not decide. In T90 (card 3) there is already only „sukces. Jadwigi Ługowskiej”. The surname of both women I record in the masculine plural from the card („Ługowskich” → Ługowski), because in a collective entry the card gives no other form.
ŁugowskiAndrzej
T8915 · share of 0.8314 manor house, 1 cottagecz. Andrzeja, Jakuba, Wojciecha z bratem, Antoniego, Wincentego, Jadwigi, Mateusza, Leonarda, Marcina, Fabjana i Wojciecha (1 d.), Szymona, Macieja, Szczepana, Jana i Fabjana (1 d.), sukc. Jadwigi (chał. ~~[słowo skreślone]~~ bez ogrod.) — Ługowskich (każde po 1 dworze, prócz ~~za~~ suk. Jadwigi) = 15 d.card 4)

the same entry also names: Ługowski Jakub, Ługowski Wojciech, Ługowski, Ługowski Antoni, Ługowski Wincenty, Ługowski Jadwiga, Ługowski Mateusz, Ługowski Leonard, Ługowski Marcin, Ługowski Fabjan, Ługowski Wojciech, Ługowski Szymon, Ługowski Maciej, Ługowski Szczepan, Ługowski Jan, Ługowski Fabjan, Ługowski Jadwiga †18 persons on 15 hearths

Eighteen persons on fifteen hearths, and so it should be: the card itself joins three groups of two persons on one hearth — „Wojciecha z bratem”, „Fabjana i Wojciecha (1 d.)”, „Jana i Fabjana (1 d.)”. The units come to exactly fifteen. The brother of Wojciech without a forename. The buildings: the card writes „każde po 1 dworze, prócz suk. Jadwigi”, and beside the successors of Jadwiga „chał. bez ogrod.” — hence 14 manor houses + 1 cottage (chałupa) = 15 d. Above a struck-out word in that bracket „bez” was added; after „prócz” a short word is struck out („za”?) [reading uncertain]. NOTE: the forename of Jadwiga stands in this entry TWICE — once among the living co-holders (with a manor house), once at the end as „sukc. Jadwigi” (with a cottage). I transcribe it as it stands; whether these are two different women or a slip of the copyist, the card does not decide. In T90 (card 3) there is already only „sukces. Jadwigi Ługowskiej”. The surname of both women I record in the masculine plural from the card („Ługowskich” → Ługowski), because in a collective entry the card gives no other form.
ŁugowskiAntoni«Kępia»
T8915 · share of 0.8314 manor house, 1 cottagecz. Andrzeja, Jakuba, Wojciecha z bratem, Antoniego, Wincentego, Jadwigi, Mateusza, Leonarda, Marcina, Fabjana i Wojciecha (1 d.), Szymona, Macieja, Szczepana, Jana i Fabjana (1 d.), sukc. Jadwigi (chał. ~~[słowo skreślone]~~ bez ogrod.) — Ługowskich (każde po 1 dworze, prócz ~~za~~ suk. Jadwigi) = 15 d.card 4)

the same entry also names: Ługowski Andrzej, Ługowski Jakub, Ługowski Wojciech, Ługowski, Ługowski Wincenty, Ługowski Jadwiga, Ługowski Mateusz, Ługowski Leonard, Ługowski Marcin, Ługowski Fabjan, Ługowski Wojciech, Ługowski Szymon, Ługowski Maciej, Ługowski Szczepan, Ługowski Jan, Ługowski Fabjan, Ługowski Jadwiga †18 persons on 15 hearths

Eighteen persons on fifteen hearths, and so it should be: the card itself joins three groups of two persons on one hearth — „Wojciecha z bratem”, „Fabjana i Wojciecha (1 d.)”, „Jana i Fabjana (1 d.)”. The units come to exactly fifteen. The brother of Wojciech without a forename. The buildings: the card writes „każde po 1 dworze, prócz suk. Jadwigi”, and beside the successors of Jadwiga „chał. bez ogrod.” — hence 14 manor houses + 1 cottage (chałupa) = 15 d. Above a struck-out word in that bracket „bez” was added; after „prócz” a short word is struck out („za”?) [reading uncertain]. NOTE: the forename of Jadwiga stands in this entry TWICE — once among the living co-holders (with a manor house), once at the end as „sukc. Jadwigi” (with a cottage). I transcribe it as it stands; whether these are two different women or a slip of the copyist, the card does not decide. In T90 (card 3) there is already only „sukces. Jadwigi Ługowskiej”. The surname of both women I record in the masculine plural from the card („Ługowskich” → Ługowski), because in a collective entry the card gives no other form.
ŁugowskiFabjan
T8915 · share of 0.8314 manor house, 1 cottagecz. Andrzeja, Jakuba, Wojciecha z bratem, Antoniego, Wincentego, Jadwigi, Mateusza, Leonarda, Marcina, Fabjana i Wojciecha (1 d.), Szymona, Macieja, Szczepana, Jana i Fabjana (1 d.), sukc. Jadwigi (chał. ~~[słowo skreślone]~~ bez ogrod.) — Ługowskich (każde po 1 dworze, prócz ~~za~~ suk. Jadwigi) = 15 d.card 4)

the same entry also names: Ługowski Andrzej, Ługowski Jakub, Ługowski Wojciech, Ługowski, Ługowski Antoni, Ługowski Wincenty, Ługowski Jadwiga, Ługowski Mateusz, Ługowski Leonard, Ługowski Marcin, Ługowski Wojciech, Ługowski Szymon, Ługowski Maciej, Ługowski Szczepan, Ługowski Jan, Ługowski Fabjan, Ługowski Jadwiga †18 persons on 15 hearths

Eighteen persons on fifteen hearths, and so it should be: the card itself joins three groups of two persons on one hearth — „Wojciecha z bratem”, „Fabjana i Wojciecha (1 d.)”, „Jana i Fabjana (1 d.)”. The units come to exactly fifteen. The brother of Wojciech without a forename. The buildings: the card writes „każde po 1 dworze, prócz suk. Jadwigi”, and beside the successors of Jadwiga „chał. bez ogrod.” — hence 14 manor houses + 1 cottage (chałupa) = 15 d. Above a struck-out word in that bracket „bez” was added; after „prócz” a short word is struck out („za”?) [reading uncertain]. NOTE: the forename of Jadwiga stands in this entry TWICE — once among the living co-holders (with a manor house), once at the end as „sukc. Jadwigi” (with a cottage). I transcribe it as it stands; whether these are two different women or a slip of the copyist, the card does not decide. In T90 (card 3) there is already only „sukces. Jadwigi Ługowskiej”. The surname of both women I record in the masculine plural from the card („Ługowskich” → Ługowski), because in a collective entry the card gives no other form.
ŁugowskiFabjan
T8915 · share of 0.8314 manor house, 1 cottagecz. Andrzeja, Jakuba, Wojciecha z bratem, Antoniego, Wincentego, Jadwigi, Mateusza, Leonarda, Marcina, Fabjana i Wojciecha (1 d.), Szymona, Macieja, Szczepana, Jana i Fabjana (1 d.), sukc. Jadwigi (chał. ~~[słowo skreślone]~~ bez ogrod.) — Ługowskich (każde po 1 dworze, prócz ~~za~~ suk. Jadwigi) = 15 d.card 4)

the same entry also names: Ługowski Andrzej, Ługowski Jakub, Ługowski Wojciech, Ługowski, Ługowski Antoni, Ługowski Wincenty, Ługowski Jadwiga, Ługowski Mateusz, Ługowski Leonard, Ługowski Marcin, Ługowski Fabjan, Ługowski Wojciech, Ługowski Szymon, Ługowski Maciej, Ługowski Szczepan, Ługowski Jan, Ługowski Jadwiga †18 persons on 15 hearths

Eighteen persons on fifteen hearths, and so it should be: the card itself joins three groups of two persons on one hearth — „Wojciecha z bratem”, „Fabjana i Wojciecha (1 d.)”, „Jana i Fabjana (1 d.)”. The units come to exactly fifteen. The brother of Wojciech without a forename. The buildings: the card writes „każde po 1 dworze, prócz suk. Jadwigi”, and beside the successors of Jadwiga „chał. bez ogrod.” — hence 14 manor houses + 1 cottage (chałupa) = 15 d. Above a struck-out word in that bracket „bez” was added; after „prócz” a short word is struck out („za”?) [reading uncertain]. NOTE: the forename of Jadwiga stands in this entry TWICE — once among the living co-holders (with a manor house), once at the end as „sukc. Jadwigi” (with a cottage). I transcribe it as it stands; whether these are two different women or a slip of the copyist, the card does not decide. In T90 (card 3) there is already only „sukces. Jadwigi Ługowskiej”. The surname of both women I record in the masculine plural from the card („Ługowskich” → Ługowski), because in a collective entry the card gives no other form.
ŁugowskaJadwiga
T8915 · share of 0.8314 manor house, 1 cottagecz. Andrzeja, Jakuba, Wojciecha z bratem, Antoniego, Wincentego, Jadwigi, Mateusza, Leonarda, Marcina, Fabjana i Wojciecha (1 d.), Szymona, Macieja, Szczepana, Jana i Fabjana (1 d.), sukc. Jadwigi (chał. ~~[słowo skreślone]~~ bez ogrod.) — Ługowskich (każde po 1 dworze, prócz ~~za~~ suk. Jadwigi) = 15 d.card 4)

the same entry also names: Ługowski Andrzej, Ługowski Jakub, Ługowski Wojciech, Ługowski, Ługowski Antoni, Ługowski Wincenty, Ługowski Mateusz, Ługowski Leonard, Ługowski Marcin, Ługowski Fabjan, Ługowski Wojciech, Ługowski Szymon, Ługowski Maciej, Ługowski Szczepan, Ługowski Jan, Ługowski Fabjan, Ługowski Jadwiga †18 persons on 15 hearths

Eighteen persons on fifteen hearths, and so it should be: the card itself joins three groups of two persons on one hearth — „Wojciecha z bratem”, „Fabjana i Wojciecha (1 d.)”, „Jana i Fabjana (1 d.)”. The units come to exactly fifteen. The brother of Wojciech without a forename. The buildings: the card writes „każde po 1 dworze, prócz suk. Jadwigi”, and beside the successors of Jadwiga „chał. bez ogrod.” — hence 14 manor houses + 1 cottage (chałupa) = 15 d. Above a struck-out word in that bracket „bez” was added; after „prócz” a short word is struck out („za”?) [reading uncertain]. NOTE: the forename of Jadwiga stands in this entry TWICE — once among the living co-holders (with a manor house), once at the end as „sukc. Jadwigi” (with a cottage). I transcribe it as it stands; whether these are two different women or a slip of the copyist, the card does not decide. In T90 (card 3) there is already only „sukces. Jadwigi Ługowskiej”. The surname of both women I record in the masculine plural from the card („Ługowskich” → Ługowski), because in a collective entry the card gives no other form.
ŁugowskaJadwiga†
T8915 · share of 0.8314 manor house, 1 cottagesuccessors† deceasedcz. Andrzeja, Jakuba, Wojciecha z bratem, Antoniego, Wincentego, Jadwigi, Mateusza, Leonarda, Marcina, Fabjana i Wojciecha (1 d.), Szymona, Macieja, Szczepana, Jana i Fabjana (1 d.), sukc. Jadwigi (chał. ~~[słowo skreślone]~~ bez ogrod.) — Ługowskich (każde po 1 dworze, prócz ~~za~~ suk. Jadwigi) = 15 d.card 4)

the same entry also names: Ługowski Andrzej, Ługowski Jakub, Ługowski Wojciech, Ługowski, Ługowski Antoni, Ługowski Wincenty, Ługowski Jadwiga, Ługowski Mateusz, Ługowski Leonard, Ługowski Marcin, Ługowski Fabjan, Ługowski Wojciech, Ługowski Szymon, Ługowski Maciej, Ługowski Szczepan, Ługowski Jan, Ługowski Fabjan18 persons on 15 hearths

Eighteen persons on fifteen hearths, and so it should be: the card itself joins three groups of two persons on one hearth — „Wojciecha z bratem”, „Fabjana i Wojciecha (1 d.)”, „Jana i Fabjana (1 d.)”. The units come to exactly fifteen. The brother of Wojciech without a forename. The buildings: the card writes „każde po 1 dworze, prócz suk. Jadwigi”, and beside the successors of Jadwiga „chał. bez ogrod.” — hence 14 manor houses + 1 cottage (chałupa) = 15 d. Above a struck-out word in that bracket „bez” was added; after „prócz” a short word is struck out („za”?) [reading uncertain]. NOTE: the forename of Jadwiga stands in this entry TWICE — once among the living co-holders (with a manor house), once at the end as „sukc. Jadwigi” (with a cottage). I transcribe it as it stands; whether these are two different women or a slip of the copyist, the card does not decide. In T90 (card 3) there is already only „sukces. Jadwigi Ługowskiej”. The surname of both women I record in the masculine plural from the card („Ługowskich” → Ługowski), because in a collective entry the card gives no other form.
ŁugowskiJakub
T8915 · share of 0.8314 manor house, 1 cottagecz. Andrzeja, Jakuba, Wojciecha z bratem, Antoniego, Wincentego, Jadwigi, Mateusza, Leonarda, Marcina, Fabjana i Wojciecha (1 d.), Szymona, Macieja, Szczepana, Jana i Fabjana (1 d.), sukc. Jadwigi (chał. ~~[słowo skreślone]~~ bez ogrod.) — Ługowskich (każde po 1 dworze, prócz ~~za~~ suk. Jadwigi) = 15 d.card 4)

the same entry also names: Ługowski Andrzej, Ługowski Wojciech, Ługowski, Ługowski Antoni, Ługowski Wincenty, Ługowski Jadwiga, Ługowski Mateusz, Ługowski Leonard, Ługowski Marcin, Ługowski Fabjan, Ługowski Wojciech, Ługowski Szymon, Ługowski Maciej, Ługowski Szczepan, Ługowski Jan, Ługowski Fabjan, Ługowski Jadwiga †18 persons on 15 hearths

Eighteen persons on fifteen hearths, and so it should be: the card itself joins three groups of two persons on one hearth — „Wojciecha z bratem”, „Fabjana i Wojciecha (1 d.)”, „Jana i Fabjana (1 d.)”. The units come to exactly fifteen. The brother of Wojciech without a forename. The buildings: the card writes „każde po 1 dworze, prócz suk. Jadwigi”, and beside the successors of Jadwiga „chał. bez ogrod.” — hence 14 manor houses + 1 cottage (chałupa) = 15 d. Above a struck-out word in that bracket „bez” was added; after „prócz” a short word is struck out („za”?) [reading uncertain]. NOTE: the forename of Jadwiga stands in this entry TWICE — once among the living co-holders (with a manor house), once at the end as „sukc. Jadwigi” (with a cottage). I transcribe it as it stands; whether these are two different women or a slip of the copyist, the card does not decide. In T90 (card 3) there is already only „sukces. Jadwigi Ługowskiej”. The surname of both women I record in the masculine plural from the card („Ługowskich” → Ługowski), because in a collective entry the card gives no other form.
ŁugowskiJan
T8915 · share of 0.8314 manor house, 1 cottagecz. Andrzeja, Jakuba, Wojciecha z bratem, Antoniego, Wincentego, Jadwigi, Mateusza, Leonarda, Marcina, Fabjana i Wojciecha (1 d.), Szymona, Macieja, Szczepana, Jana i Fabjana (1 d.), sukc. Jadwigi (chał. ~~[słowo skreślone]~~ bez ogrod.) — Ługowskich (każde po 1 dworze, prócz ~~za~~ suk. Jadwigi) = 15 d.card 4)

the same entry also names: Ługowski Andrzej, Ługowski Jakub, Ługowski Wojciech, Ługowski, Ługowski Antoni, Ługowski Wincenty, Ługowski Jadwiga, Ługowski Mateusz, Ługowski Leonard, Ługowski Marcin, Ługowski Fabjan, Ługowski Wojciech, Ługowski Szymon, Ługowski Maciej, Ługowski Szczepan, Ługowski Fabjan, Ługowski Jadwiga †18 persons on 15 hearths

Eighteen persons on fifteen hearths, and so it should be: the card itself joins three groups of two persons on one hearth — „Wojciecha z bratem”, „Fabjana i Wojciecha (1 d.)”, „Jana i Fabjana (1 d.)”. The units come to exactly fifteen. The brother of Wojciech without a forename. The buildings: the card writes „każde po 1 dworze, prócz suk. Jadwigi”, and beside the successors of Jadwiga „chał. bez ogrod.” — hence 14 manor houses + 1 cottage (chałupa) = 15 d. Above a struck-out word in that bracket „bez” was added; after „prócz” a short word is struck out („za”?) [reading uncertain]. NOTE: the forename of Jadwiga stands in this entry TWICE — once among the living co-holders (with a manor house), once at the end as „sukc. Jadwigi” (with a cottage). I transcribe it as it stands; whether these are two different women or a slip of the copyist, the card does not decide. In T90 (card 3) there is already only „sukces. Jadwigi Ługowskiej”. The surname of both women I record in the masculine plural from the card („Ługowskich” → Ługowski), because in a collective entry the card gives no other form.
ŁugowskiLeonard«Kępia»
T8915 · share of 0.8314 manor house, 1 cottagecz. Andrzeja, Jakuba, Wojciecha z bratem, Antoniego, Wincentego, Jadwigi, Mateusza, Leonarda, Marcina, Fabjana i Wojciecha (1 d.), Szymona, Macieja, Szczepana, Jana i Fabjana (1 d.), sukc. Jadwigi (chał. ~~[słowo skreślone]~~ bez ogrod.) — Ługowskich (każde po 1 dworze, prócz ~~za~~ suk. Jadwigi) = 15 d.card 4)

the same entry also names: Ługowski Andrzej, Ługowski Jakub, Ługowski Wojciech, Ługowski, Ługowski Antoni, Ługowski Wincenty, Ługowski Jadwiga, Ługowski Mateusz, Ługowski Marcin, Ługowski Fabjan, Ługowski Wojciech, Ługowski Szymon, Ługowski Maciej, Ługowski Szczepan, Ługowski Jan, Ługowski Fabjan, Ługowski Jadwiga †18 persons on 15 hearths

Eighteen persons on fifteen hearths, and so it should be: the card itself joins three groups of two persons on one hearth — „Wojciecha z bratem”, „Fabjana i Wojciecha (1 d.)”, „Jana i Fabjana (1 d.)”. The units come to exactly fifteen. The brother of Wojciech without a forename. The buildings: the card writes „każde po 1 dworze, prócz suk. Jadwigi”, and beside the successors of Jadwiga „chał. bez ogrod.” — hence 14 manor houses + 1 cottage (chałupa) = 15 d. Above a struck-out word in that bracket „bez” was added; after „prócz” a short word is struck out („za”?) [reading uncertain]. NOTE: the forename of Jadwiga stands in this entry TWICE — once among the living co-holders (with a manor house), once at the end as „sukc. Jadwigi” (with a cottage). I transcribe it as it stands; whether these are two different women or a slip of the copyist, the card does not decide. In T90 (card 3) there is already only „sukces. Jadwigi Ługowskiej”. The surname of both women I record in the masculine plural from the card („Ługowskich” → Ługowski), because in a collective entry the card gives no other form.
ŁugowskiMaciej«Krolik»
T8915 · share of 0.8314 manor house, 1 cottagecz. Andrzeja, Jakuba, Wojciecha z bratem, Antoniego, Wincentego, Jadwigi, Mateusza, Leonarda, Marcina, Fabjana i Wojciecha (1 d.), Szymona, Macieja, Szczepana, Jana i Fabjana (1 d.), sukc. Jadwigi (chał. ~~[słowo skreślone]~~ bez ogrod.) — Ługowskich (każde po 1 dworze, prócz ~~za~~ suk. Jadwigi) = 15 d.card 4)

the same entry also names: Ługowski Andrzej, Ługowski Jakub, Ługowski Wojciech, Ługowski, Ługowski Antoni, Ługowski Wincenty, Ługowski Jadwiga, Ługowski Mateusz, Ługowski Leonard, Ługowski Marcin, Ługowski Fabjan, Ługowski Wojciech, Ługowski Szymon, Ługowski Szczepan, Ługowski Jan, Ługowski Fabjan, Ługowski Jadwiga †18 persons on 15 hearths

Eighteen persons on fifteen hearths, and so it should be: the card itself joins three groups of two persons on one hearth — „Wojciecha z bratem”, „Fabjana i Wojciecha (1 d.)”, „Jana i Fabjana (1 d.)”. The units come to exactly fifteen. The brother of Wojciech without a forename. The buildings: the card writes „każde po 1 dworze, prócz suk. Jadwigi”, and beside the successors of Jadwiga „chał. bez ogrod.” — hence 14 manor houses + 1 cottage (chałupa) = 15 d. Above a struck-out word in that bracket „bez” was added; after „prócz” a short word is struck out („za”?) [reading uncertain]. NOTE: the forename of Jadwiga stands in this entry TWICE — once among the living co-holders (with a manor house), once at the end as „sukc. Jadwigi” (with a cottage). I transcribe it as it stands; whether these are two different women or a slip of the copyist, the card does not decide. In T90 (card 3) there is already only „sukces. Jadwigi Ługowskiej”. The surname of both women I record in the masculine plural from the card („Ługowskich” → Ługowski), because in a collective entry the card gives no other form.
ŁugowskiMarcin«Wyszek»
T8915 · share of 0.8314 manor house, 1 cottagecz. Andrzeja, Jakuba, Wojciecha z bratem, Antoniego, Wincentego, Jadwigi, Mateusza, Leonarda, Marcina, Fabjana i Wojciecha (1 d.), Szymona, Macieja, Szczepana, Jana i Fabjana (1 d.), sukc. Jadwigi (chał. ~~[słowo skreślone]~~ bez ogrod.) — Ługowskich (każde po 1 dworze, prócz ~~za~~ suk. Jadwigi) = 15 d.card 4)

the same entry also names: Ługowski Andrzej, Ługowski Jakub, Ługowski Wojciech, Ługowski, Ługowski Antoni, Ługowski Wincenty, Ługowski Jadwiga, Ługowski Mateusz, Ługowski Leonard, Ługowski Fabjan, Ługowski Wojciech, Ługowski Szymon, Ługowski Maciej, Ługowski Szczepan, Ługowski Jan, Ługowski Fabjan, Ługowski Jadwiga †18 persons on 15 hearths

Eighteen persons on fifteen hearths, and so it should be: the card itself joins three groups of two persons on one hearth — „Wojciecha z bratem”, „Fabjana i Wojciecha (1 d.)”, „Jana i Fabjana (1 d.)”. The units come to exactly fifteen. The brother of Wojciech without a forename. The buildings: the card writes „każde po 1 dworze, prócz suk. Jadwigi”, and beside the successors of Jadwiga „chał. bez ogrod.” — hence 14 manor houses + 1 cottage (chałupa) = 15 d. Above a struck-out word in that bracket „bez” was added; after „prócz” a short word is struck out („za”?) [reading uncertain]. NOTE: the forename of Jadwiga stands in this entry TWICE — once among the living co-holders (with a manor house), once at the end as „sukc. Jadwigi” (with a cottage). I transcribe it as it stands; whether these are two different women or a slip of the copyist, the card does not decide. In T90 (card 3) there is already only „sukces. Jadwigi Ługowskiej”. The surname of both women I record in the masculine plural from the card („Ługowskich” → Ługowski), because in a collective entry the card gives no other form.
ŁugowskiMateusz
T8915 · share of 0.8314 manor house, 1 cottagecz. Andrzeja, Jakuba, Wojciecha z bratem, Antoniego, Wincentego, Jadwigi, Mateusza, Leonarda, Marcina, Fabjana i Wojciecha (1 d.), Szymona, Macieja, Szczepana, Jana i Fabjana (1 d.), sukc. Jadwigi (chał. ~~[słowo skreślone]~~ bez ogrod.) — Ługowskich (każde po 1 dworze, prócz ~~za~~ suk. Jadwigi) = 15 d.card 4)

the same entry also names: Ługowski Andrzej, Ługowski Jakub, Ługowski Wojciech, Ługowski, Ługowski Antoni, Ługowski Wincenty, Ługowski Jadwiga, Ługowski Leonard, Ługowski Marcin, Ługowski Fabjan, Ługowski Wojciech, Ługowski Szymon, Ługowski Maciej, Ługowski Szczepan, Ługowski Jan, Ługowski Fabjan, Ługowski Jadwiga †18 persons on 15 hearths

Eighteen persons on fifteen hearths, and so it should be: the card itself joins three groups of two persons on one hearth — „Wojciecha z bratem”, „Fabjana i Wojciecha (1 d.)”, „Jana i Fabjana (1 d.)”. The units come to exactly fifteen. The brother of Wojciech without a forename. The buildings: the card writes „każde po 1 dworze, prócz suk. Jadwigi”, and beside the successors of Jadwiga „chał. bez ogrod.” — hence 14 manor houses + 1 cottage (chałupa) = 15 d. Above a struck-out word in that bracket „bez” was added; after „prócz” a short word is struck out („za”?) [reading uncertain]. NOTE: the forename of Jadwiga stands in this entry TWICE — once among the living co-holders (with a manor house), once at the end as „sukc. Jadwigi” (with a cottage). I transcribe it as it stands; whether these are two different women or a slip of the copyist, the card does not decide. In T90 (card 3) there is already only „sukces. Jadwigi Ługowskiej”. The surname of both women I record in the masculine plural from the card („Ługowskich” → Ługowski), because in a collective entry the card gives no other form.
ŁugowskiSzczepan
T8915 · share of 0.8314 manor house, 1 cottagecz. Andrzeja, Jakuba, Wojciecha z bratem, Antoniego, Wincentego, Jadwigi, Mateusza, Leonarda, Marcina, Fabjana i Wojciecha (1 d.), Szymona, Macieja, Szczepana, Jana i Fabjana (1 d.), sukc. Jadwigi (chał. ~~[słowo skreślone]~~ bez ogrod.) — Ługowskich (każde po 1 dworze, prócz ~~za~~ suk. Jadwigi) = 15 d.card 4)

the same entry also names: Ługowski Andrzej, Ługowski Jakub, Ługowski Wojciech, Ługowski, Ługowski Antoni, Ługowski Wincenty, Ługowski Jadwiga, Ługowski Mateusz, Ługowski Leonard, Ługowski Marcin, Ługowski Fabjan, Ługowski Wojciech, Ługowski Szymon, Ługowski Maciej, Ługowski Jan, Ługowski Fabjan, Ługowski Jadwiga †18 persons on 15 hearths

Eighteen persons on fifteen hearths, and so it should be: the card itself joins three groups of two persons on one hearth — „Wojciecha z bratem”, „Fabjana i Wojciecha (1 d.)”, „Jana i Fabjana (1 d.)”. The units come to exactly fifteen. The brother of Wojciech without a forename. The buildings: the card writes „każde po 1 dworze, prócz suk. Jadwigi”, and beside the successors of Jadwiga „chał. bez ogrod.” — hence 14 manor houses + 1 cottage (chałupa) = 15 d. Above a struck-out word in that bracket „bez” was added; after „prócz” a short word is struck out („za”?) [reading uncertain]. NOTE: the forename of Jadwiga stands in this entry TWICE — once among the living co-holders (with a manor house), once at the end as „sukc. Jadwigi” (with a cottage). I transcribe it as it stands; whether these are two different women or a slip of the copyist, the card does not decide. In T90 (card 3) there is already only „sukces. Jadwigi Ługowskiej”. The surname of both women I record in the masculine plural from the card („Ługowskich” → Ługowski), because in a collective entry the card gives no other form.
ŁugowskiSzymon«Panoszek»
T8915 · share of 0.8314 manor house, 1 cottagecz. Andrzeja, Jakuba, Wojciecha z bratem, Antoniego, Wincentego, Jadwigi, Mateusza, Leonarda, Marcina, Fabjana i Wojciecha (1 d.), Szymona, Macieja, Szczepana, Jana i Fabjana (1 d.), sukc. Jadwigi (chał. ~~[słowo skreślone]~~ bez ogrod.) — Ługowskich (każde po 1 dworze, prócz ~~za~~ suk. Jadwigi) = 15 d.card 4)

the same entry also names: Ługowski Andrzej, Ługowski Jakub, Ługowski Wojciech, Ługowski, Ługowski Antoni, Ługowski Wincenty, Ługowski Jadwiga, Ługowski Mateusz, Ługowski Leonard, Ługowski Marcin, Ługowski Fabjan, Ługowski Wojciech, Ługowski Maciej, Ługowski Szczepan, Ługowski Jan, Ługowski Fabjan, Ługowski Jadwiga †18 persons on 15 hearths

Eighteen persons on fifteen hearths, and so it should be: the card itself joins three groups of two persons on one hearth — „Wojciecha z bratem”, „Fabjana i Wojciecha (1 d.)”, „Jana i Fabjana (1 d.)”. The units come to exactly fifteen. The brother of Wojciech without a forename. The buildings: the card writes „każde po 1 dworze, prócz suk. Jadwigi”, and beside the successors of Jadwiga „chał. bez ogrod.” — hence 14 manor houses + 1 cottage (chałupa) = 15 d. Above a struck-out word in that bracket „bez” was added; after „prócz” a short word is struck out („za”?) [reading uncertain]. NOTE: the forename of Jadwiga stands in this entry TWICE — once among the living co-holders (with a manor house), once at the end as „sukc. Jadwigi” (with a cottage). I transcribe it as it stands; whether these are two different women or a slip of the copyist, the card does not decide. In T90 (card 3) there is already only „sukces. Jadwigi Ługowskiej”. The surname of both women I record in the masculine plural from the card („Ługowskich” → Ługowski), because in a collective entry the card gives no other form.
ŁugowskiWincenty
T8915 · share of 0.8314 manor house, 1 cottagecz. Andrzeja, Jakuba, Wojciecha z bratem, Antoniego, Wincentego, Jadwigi, Mateusza, Leonarda, Marcina, Fabjana i Wojciecha (1 d.), Szymona, Macieja, Szczepana, Jana i Fabjana (1 d.), sukc. Jadwigi (chał. ~~[słowo skreślone]~~ bez ogrod.) — Ługowskich (każde po 1 dworze, prócz ~~za~~ suk. Jadwigi) = 15 d.card 4)

the same entry also names: Ługowski Andrzej, Ługowski Jakub, Ługowski Wojciech, Ługowski, Ługowski Antoni, Ługowski Jadwiga, Ługowski Mateusz, Ługowski Leonard, Ługowski Marcin, Ługowski Fabjan, Ługowski Wojciech, Ługowski Szymon, Ługowski Maciej, Ługowski Szczepan, Ługowski Jan, Ługowski Fabjan, Ługowski Jadwiga †18 persons on 15 hearths

Eighteen persons on fifteen hearths, and so it should be: the card itself joins three groups of two persons on one hearth — „Wojciecha z bratem”, „Fabjana i Wojciecha (1 d.)”, „Jana i Fabjana (1 d.)”. The units come to exactly fifteen. The brother of Wojciech without a forename. The buildings: the card writes „każde po 1 dworze, prócz suk. Jadwigi”, and beside the successors of Jadwiga „chał. bez ogrod.” — hence 14 manor houses + 1 cottage (chałupa) = 15 d. Above a struck-out word in that bracket „bez” was added; after „prócz” a short word is struck out („za”?) [reading uncertain]. NOTE: the forename of Jadwiga stands in this entry TWICE — once among the living co-holders (with a manor house), once at the end as „sukc. Jadwigi” (with a cottage). I transcribe it as it stands; whether these are two different women or a slip of the copyist, the card does not decide. In T90 (card 3) there is already only „sukces. Jadwigi Ługowskiej”. The surname of both women I record in the masculine plural from the card („Ługowskich” → Ługowski), because in a collective entry the card gives no other form.
ŁugowskiWojciech
T8915 · share of 0.8314 manor house, 1 cottagecz. Andrzeja, Jakuba, Wojciecha z bratem, Antoniego, Wincentego, Jadwigi, Mateusza, Leonarda, Marcina, Fabjana i Wojciecha (1 d.), Szymona, Macieja, Szczepana, Jana i Fabjana (1 d.), sukc. Jadwigi (chał. ~~[słowo skreślone]~~ bez ogrod.) — Ługowskich (każde po 1 dworze, prócz ~~za~~ suk. Jadwigi) = 15 d.card 4)

the same entry also names: Ługowski Andrzej, Ługowski Jakub, Ługowski, Ługowski Antoni, Ługowski Wincenty, Ługowski Jadwiga, Ługowski Mateusz, Ługowski Leonard, Ługowski Marcin, Ługowski Fabjan, Ługowski Wojciech, Ługowski Szymon, Ługowski Maciej, Ługowski Szczepan, Ługowski Jan, Ługowski Fabjan, Ługowski Jadwiga †18 persons on 15 hearths

Eighteen persons on fifteen hearths, and so it should be: the card itself joins three groups of two persons on one hearth — „Wojciecha z bratem”, „Fabjana i Wojciecha (1 d.)”, „Jana i Fabjana (1 d.)”. The units come to exactly fifteen. The brother of Wojciech without a forename. The buildings: the card writes „każde po 1 dworze, prócz suk. Jadwigi”, and beside the successors of Jadwiga „chał. bez ogrod.” — hence 14 manor houses + 1 cottage (chałupa) = 15 d. Above a struck-out word in that bracket „bez” was added; after „prócz” a short word is struck out („za”?) [reading uncertain]. NOTE: the forename of Jadwiga stands in this entry TWICE — once among the living co-holders (with a manor house), once at the end as „sukc. Jadwigi” (with a cottage). I transcribe it as it stands; whether these are two different women or a slip of the copyist, the card does not decide. In T90 (card 3) there is already only „sukces. Jadwigi Ługowskiej”. The surname of both women I record in the masculine plural from the card („Ługowskich” → Ługowski), because in a collective entry the card gives no other form.
ŁugowskiWojciech
T8915 · share of 0.8314 manor house, 1 cottagecz. Andrzeja, Jakuba, Wojciecha z bratem, Antoniego, Wincentego, Jadwigi, Mateusza, Leonarda, Marcina, Fabjana i Wojciecha (1 d.), Szymona, Macieja, Szczepana, Jana i Fabjana (1 d.), sukc. Jadwigi (chał. ~~[słowo skreślone]~~ bez ogrod.) — Ługowskich (każde po 1 dworze, prócz ~~za~~ suk. Jadwigi) = 15 d.card 4)

the same entry also names: Ługowski Andrzej, Ługowski Jakub, Ługowski Wojciech, Ługowski, Ługowski Antoni, Ługowski Wincenty, Ługowski Jadwiga, Ługowski Mateusz, Ługowski Leonard, Ługowski Marcin, Ługowski Fabjan, Ługowski Szymon, Ługowski Maciej, Ługowski Szczepan, Ługowski Jan, Ługowski Fabjan, Ługowski Jadwiga †18 persons on 15 hearths

Eighteen persons on fifteen hearths, and so it should be: the card itself joins three groups of two persons on one hearth — „Wojciecha z bratem”, „Fabjana i Wojciecha (1 d.)”, „Jana i Fabjana (1 d.)”. The units come to exactly fifteen. The brother of Wojciech without a forename. The buildings: the card writes „każde po 1 dworze, prócz suk. Jadwigi”, and beside the successors of Jadwiga „chał. bez ogrod.” — hence 14 manor houses + 1 cottage (chałupa) = 15 d. Above a struck-out word in that bracket „bez” was added; after „prócz” a short word is struck out („za”?) [reading uncertain]. NOTE: the forename of Jadwiga stands in this entry TWICE — once among the living co-holders (with a manor house), once at the end as „sukc. Jadwigi” (with a cottage). I transcribe it as it stands; whether these are two different women or a slip of the copyist, the card does not decide. In T90 (card 3) there is already only „sukces. Jadwigi Ługowskiej”. The surname of both women I record in the masculine plural from the card („Ługowskich” → Ługowski), because in a collective entry the card gives no other form.
TchórzewskiJózef
T891 hearthcz. Tchorzewskiego Józefa = 1 d.card 4)

The card sets the surname before the forename.

StruśJoachim
T891 hearthcz. Strusa Joachima = 1 d.card 4)

The card sets the surname before the forename. The genitive is written here „Strusa” (hard), in T90, entry E (card 3), „Strusia” (soft), in T75, entry 6 (card 1), „Strusów”. I take the nominative after `nazwiska.json`: Struś.

ChromińskiAdam
T892 · each 1cz. Adama, Wawrzyńca Chromieńskich (po 1 d.) = 2 d.card 4)

the same entry also names: Chromieński Wawrzyniec2 persons on 2 hearths

ChromińskiWawrzyniec
T892 · each 1cz. Adama, Wawrzyńca Chromieńskich (po 1 d.) = 2 d.card 4)

the same entry also names: Chromieński Adam2 persons on 2 hearths

TarczewskiAndrzej
T891 hearthcz. Tarczmowskiego Andrzeja 1 d.card 4)
The card sets the surname before the forename. The writing of the surname [reading uncertain] — after „Tarcz” two arcs and an „o”, which I read as „mo”, though „no” is possible; in T90, entry C (card 2), the same Andrzej is written „Tarzewskiego”. Three things are certain: it is the same person (Andrzej, the same holding, 1 hearth), the spellings differ, and neither of them can I reduce to a certain nominative.
JezowskiMateusz
T891 hearthcz. ~~sukc.~~ Jezowskiego Mateusza 1 dcard 4)
The card sets the surname before the forename. Above the surname „sukc.” was added and struck out — since the abbreviation is deleted, I do NOT hold Mateusz to be dead; in T75, entry 10 (card 2), he appears living, without that abbreviation. The surname as on card 2): „Jezowskiego”, without a dot over the „z”.

1789 T₀89List of possessors of holdings of 1789

ChromińskiWawrzeniec
T₀89T₀89 – cz. Wawrzeńca Chromińskiego ¹⁾card 6)

The forename is written „Wawrzeńca”, in T89, T90 and T94 of the same person — „Wawrzyńca”; I leave the form of the card. The index „1)” refers to entry P3 („Żurowszczyzna zastawna Wawrzeńcowi Chromińskiemu”) and to the explanation at the foot of the card: „1) ten sam”.

ŁugowskiAndrzej
T₀89cz. Andrzeja Ługowskiegocard 6)
ŁugowskiJakub
T₀89cz. Jakuba Ługowskiegocard 6)

The last entry of the left-hand column.

ChromińskiAdam
T₀89cz. Adama Chromińskiegocard 6)
ŁugowskiAntoni«Kępia»
T₀89cz. Antoniego Ługowskiegocard 6)

Antoni Ługowski stands twice on this card — here and in entry P2. The card distinguishes them by nothing; I do not decide whether these are two persons or a repetition.

ŁugowskiMateusz
T₀89cz. Mateusza Ługowskiegocard 6)
ŁugowskiFabian
T₀89cz. Fabiana Ługowskiegocard 6)

Fabian Ługowski stands twice on this card (here and L8) — in agreement with T89 and T94, which likewise count two Fabjans. This card writes „Fabiana”, those write „Fabjana”.

ŁugowskiSzymon«Panoszek»
T₀89cz. Szymona Ługowskiegocard 6)
TchórzewskiAndrzej
T₀89cz. Andrzeja Tchorzewskiegocard 6)

Andrzej Tchorzewski — in the registers the only Tchorzewski is Józef, while Andrzej bears a surname read as „Tarzewski”/„Tarczmowski”. Whether this is the same person the card does not say; I do not merge them.

ŁugowskiFabian
T₀89cz. Fabiana Ługowskiegocard 6)

The second Fabian Ługowski on this card; see L5.

DrohojewskiAntoniparish priest of Siedlce (proboszcz siedlecki)
T₀89priest (ksiądz)propination (the right to sell drink)cz. Antoniego Drohojewskiego, proboszcza siedleckiego - propin.card 6)
The only place in the whole village where this cleric has a forename: Antoni. The card does not set the abbreviation „X.” here, but the office („proboszcza siedleckiego”) leaves no room for doubt. Three cards give three spellings of the surname: here „Drohojewskiego”, in T89 (card 4) „Drohoiewskiego”, in O83 (card 3) „Drochojewskiego” — I do not merge them. In the same years T90 and T94 have beside the parish priest of Siedlce an entirely different surname, „Katemberk”.
StruśJoachim
T₀89cz. Joachima Struscard 6)
The surname is written uninflected, in the form „Strus” (hard); the other cards of this village give „Strusia” (T90, T94), „Strusa” (T89), „Strusów” (T75). I take the nominative after `nazwiska.json`: Struś. The entry stands above the horizontal stroke, in the upper part of the right-hand column.
TchórzewskiJózef
T₀89cz. Józefa Tchorzewskiegocard 6)
ŁugowskiWojciech
T₀89cz. Wojciecha Ługowskiegocard 6)
ŁugowskiJan
T₀89cz. Jana Ługowskiego — [na dole fiszki:] 1) ten samcard 6)

The last entry of the right-hand column and of the whole card. Below it, outside the list, stands the explanation of a note: „1) ten sam” — it concerns entries L1 and P3, not this one.

ŁugowskiAntoni«Kępia»
T₀89cz. Antoniego Ługowskiegocard 6)

The second Antoni Ługowski on this card; see L3. The entry stands above the horizontal stroke.

ChromińskiWawrzeniec
T₀89pledgepledgecz. Żurowszczyzna zastawna Wawrzeńcowi Chromińskiemu ¹⁾card 6)

the same entry also names: Żurawski2 persons on a holding without hearths

The card gives the bare name of the holding in the adjectival form („Żurowszczyzna”), without the forename of its owner; I link it with the Żurawskis, because T75, entry 4 (card 1), records in this village „cz. Antoniego Żurawskiego dym 1” — this is a conclusion drawn from comparing the cards, not the writing of the card. The first letter of the name [reading uncertain]: a capital „Ż/Z”, without the crossbar which the same hand sets in the „Ł” of the word „Ługowskiego” in the line below — I therefore read „Żurowszczyzna”, and not „Ługowszczyzna”; further on „-urow-” is clear, not „-ugow-”. The index „1)” refers to L1 and to the explanation „1) ten sam” at the foot of the card: Wawrzeniec Chromiński, who holds this holding in pledge, is the same man who has a holding of his own in L1.
Żurawski
T₀89holdingpledgecz. Żurowszczyzna zastawna Wawrzeńcowi Chromińskiemu ¹⁾card 6)

the same entry also names: Chromiński Wawrzeniec2 persons on a holding without hearths

The card gives the bare name of the holding in the adjectival form („Żurowszczyzna”), without the forename of its owner; I link it with the Żurawskis, because T75, entry 4 (card 1), records in this village „cz. Antoniego Żurawskiego dym 1” — this is a conclusion drawn from comparing the cards, not the writing of the card. The first letter of the name [reading uncertain]: a capital „Ż/Z”, without the crossbar which the same hand sets in the „Ł” of the word „Ługowskiego” in the line below — I therefore read „Żurowszczyzna”, and not „Ługowszczyzna”; further on „-urow-” is clear, not „-ugow-”. The index „1)” refers to L1 and to the explanation „1) ten sam” at the foot of the card: Wawrzeniec Chromiński, who holds this holding in pledge, is the same man who has a holding of his own in L1.
ŁugowskiWincenty
T₀89cz. Wincentego Ługowskiegocard 6)
ŁugowskaJadwiga
T₀89cz. Jadwigi Ługowskiejcard 6)
A woman: the feminine form of the surname on the card („Jadwigi Ługowskiej”) and a feminine forename. AN IMPORTANT DISCREPANCY: here Jadwiga holds the holding herself, without any „sukc.”, whereas T89 (card 4), the same year 1789), T90 and T94 speak of the „sukcesorach Jadwigi”, that is, of a person already dead. I do not smooth this over — I leave the mark for a deceased person empty, because this card says nothing of a death.
ŁugowskiMarcin«Wyszek»
T₀89cz. Marcina Ługowskiegocard 6)
SkwirczyńskiBartłomiej
T₀89cz. Bartłomieja Skwirczyńskiegocard 6)

A surname recorded in no register of this village — it appears only in the list of possessors of 1789.

ŁugowskiSzczepan
T₀89cz. Szczepana Ługowskiegocard 6)
ŁugowskiMaciej«Krolik»
T₀89cz. Macieja Ługowskiegocard 6)

1790 T90Hearth tax register 1790

LipińskiAntoni
T902 · share of 1A) cz. Antoniego syna Piotra Lepińskiego — 2 dymy wiejskie 2giej klasycard 2)

the same entry also names: Lepiński Piotr2 persons on 2 hearths

The possessor is Antoni; the father Piotr is named only for the identification of the son („Antoniego syna Piotra”), and I enter both, because the card names both. The surname „Lepińskiego” — the second letter legible as an „e”; „Lipiński” is possible [reading uncertain].
LipińskiPiotr
T902 · share of 1A) cz. Antoniego syna Piotra Lepińskiego — 2 dymy wiejskie 2giej klasycard 2)

the same entry also names: Lepiński Antoni2 persons on 2 hearths

The possessor is Antoni; the father Piotr is named only for the identification of the son („Antoniego syna Piotra”), and I enter both, because the card names both. The surname „Lepińskiego” — the second letter legible as an „e”; „Lipiński” is possible [reading uncertain].
JezewskiStanisław
T901 hearthB) cz. Stan. J[e]zewskiego — 1 [dym wiejski 2giej klasy]card 2)
The surname [reading uncertain]. The card writes closely „J?zewskiego”: a capital letter with a loop and a hook below the line, then „z” at once, without a clear „e”. The glyph itself admitted also of the reading „Trzewskiego”, but comparison under magnification with the capital „T” in the neighbouring entry C („Tarzewskiego”, a long horizontal beam, without a hook below the line) and with the capital „J” in „Jastrzebskiego” and „Jezowskiego” of the same card speaks for a „J”. The arrangement of the registers decides it: entry B in T90 stands at exactly the same place in the run as „cz. Stanisława Jezewskiego 1 d.” in T94 (card 5) — the same person, the same holding, the same 1 hearth. The letter „e” in square brackets is my supplement, not the writing of the card.
TarczewskiAndrzej
T901 hearthC) cz. Tarzewskiego Andrzeja — 1 [dym wiejski 2giej klasy]card 2)

The card sets the surname before the forename. The spelling „Tarzewskiego” [reading uncertain] — between the „r” and the „e” a glyph which can be read as „z” or as „cz” („Tarczewski”). See the note at entry B.

Katemberkparish priest of Siedlce (proboszcz siedlecki)
T901 hearthpriest (ksiądz)hereditary ownerD) cz. X. Katemberka proboszcza siedleckiego dziedz. — 1 [dym wiejski 2giej klasy]card 2)
A cleric: „X.” = ksiądz, priest. The card gives no forename. The surname „Katemberka” (genitive) [reading uncertain], the nominative „Katemberk” reconstructed. „dziedz.” = dziedziczna, hereditary, hence the note „dziedzic”. NOTE: O83 (card 3) and T89 point at this benefice to the priest Drochojewski — in different years the card calls two different persons the parish priest of Siedlce; I do not smooth this over.
StruśJoachim
T901 hearthc.d. T90. – E) cz. Joachima Strusia — 1 dym wiejski 2giej klasy;card 3)
TchórzewskiJózef
T901 hearthF) cz. Józefa Tchorzewskiego — 1 [dym wiejski 2giej klasy]card 3)

Here the spelling is clear: „Tchorzewskiego”. In T75, entry 3 (card 1), the same Józef is written „Thorewskiego” — both readings checked under magnification; I do not merge the forms on my own; to be resolved by the owner of the card index.

ChromińskiAdam
T902 · each 1G) cz. Adama i Wawrzyńca Chromieńskich po 1 dymie – 2 [dymy wiejskie 2giej klasy]card 3)

the same entry also names: Chromieński Wawrzyniec2 persons on 2 hearths

This card writes „Chromieńskich”, card 1) (T75, entry 5) — „Chromińskiego”. Both forms are recognised in `nazwiska.json` as one surname (Chromiński / Chromieński); the writing of the card I leave untouched.

ChromińskiWawrzyniec
T902 · each 1G) cz. Adama i Wawrzyńca Chromieńskich po 1 dymie – 2 [dymy wiejskie 2giej klasy]card 3)

the same entry also names: Chromieński Adam2 persons on 2 hearths

This card writes „Chromieńskich”, card 1) (T75, entry 5) — „Chromińskiego”. Both forms are recognised in `nazwiska.json` as one surname (Chromiński / Chromieński); the writing of the card I leave untouched.

BorkowskiAntoni
T901 · share of 0.50possessorpossessorH) cz. sukces. Jadwigi Ługowskiej, trzymana przez Antoniego Borkowskiego – 1 [dym wiejski 2giej klasy]card 3)

the same entry also names: Ługowska Jadwiga †2 persons on 1 hearth

A woman recognised by the feminine form of the surname („Jadwigi Ługowskiej”) and by the forename; I record the surname in the feminine form from the card. The holding belongs to her successors, so Jadwiga herself is already dead. The holding is held by Antoni Borkowski — the same man who in T75, entry 8 (card 2), has a hearth of his own.
ŁugowskaJadwiga†
T901 · share of 0.50successors† deceasedpossessorH) cz. sukces. Jadwigi Ługowskiej, trzymana przez Antoniego Borkowskiego – 1 [dym wiejski 2giej klasy]card 3)

the same entry also names: Borkowski Antoni2 persons on 1 hearth

A woman recognised by the feminine form of the surname („Jadwigi Ługowskiej”) and by the forename; I record the surname in the feminine form from the card. The holding belongs to her successors, so Jadwiga herself is already dead. The holding is held by Antoni Borkowski — the same man who in T75, entry 8 (card 2), has a hearth of his own.
Ługowski„Stanisławowej”
T9013 · share of 0.87I) cz. Andrzeja; Antoniego; Fabiana; Jana i Fabiana; Jakóba; Leonarda; Macieja; Marcina; Mateusza; Stanisławowej; Szymona; Wincentego; Wojciecha i Jana – Ługowskich – po 1 dymie; – 13 [dymów wiejskich 2giej klasy]card 3)

the same entry also names: Ługowski Andrzej, Ługowski Antoni, Ługowski Fabian, Ługowski Jan, Ługowski Fabian, Ługowski Jakób, Ługowski Leonard, Ługowski Maciej, Ługowski Marcin, Ługowski Mateusz, Ługowski Szymon, Ługowski Wincenty, Ługowski Wojciech, Ługowski Jan15 persons on 13 hearths

Fifteen persons on thirteen hearths — and so it should be. The card separates the co-holders with semicolons, and in two places joins two persons by the conjunction „i”: „Jana i Fabiana” and „Wojciecha i Jana”. Of such groups there are exactly thirteen and each has „po 1 dymie”, so those two pairs sit two to a hearth. The surname „Ługowskich” stands once, at the end, and refers to them all. „Stanisławowej” is a form derived from the husband's name — a woman whom the card does not name by a forename of her own; I record her literally in the recorded form of the name and do not expand her, and the surname I leave in the masculine plural from the card („Ługowskich” → Ługowski), because in a collective entry only such a form stands here.
ŁugowskiAndrzej
T9013 · share of 0.87I) cz. Andrzeja; Antoniego; Fabiana; Jana i Fabiana; Jakóba; Leonarda; Macieja; Marcina; Mateusza; Stanisławowej; Szymona; Wincentego; Wojciecha i Jana – Ługowskich – po 1 dymie; – 13 [dymów wiejskich 2giej klasy]card 3)

the same entry also names: Ługowski Antoni, Ługowski Fabian, Ługowski Jan, Ługowski Fabian, Ługowski Jakób, Ługowski Leonard, Ługowski Maciej, Ługowski Marcin, Ługowski Mateusz, Ługowski, Ługowski Szymon, Ługowski Wincenty, Ługowski Wojciech, Ługowski Jan15 persons on 13 hearths

Fifteen persons on thirteen hearths — and so it should be. The card separates the co-holders with semicolons, and in two places joins two persons by the conjunction „i”: „Jana i Fabiana” and „Wojciecha i Jana”. Of such groups there are exactly thirteen and each has „po 1 dymie”, so those two pairs sit two to a hearth. The surname „Ługowskich” stands once, at the end, and refers to them all. „Stanisławowej” is a form derived from the husband's name — a woman whom the card does not name by a forename of her own; I record her literally in the recorded form of the name and do not expand her, and the surname I leave in the masculine plural from the card („Ługowskich” → Ługowski), because in a collective entry only such a form stands here.
ŁugowskiAntoni«Kępia»
T9013 · share of 0.87I) cz. Andrzeja; Antoniego; Fabiana; Jana i Fabiana; Jakóba; Leonarda; Macieja; Marcina; Mateusza; Stanisławowej; Szymona; Wincentego; Wojciecha i Jana – Ługowskich – po 1 dymie; – 13 [dymów wiejskich 2giej klasy]card 3)

the same entry also names: Ługowski Andrzej, Ługowski Fabian, Ługowski Jan, Ługowski Fabian, Ługowski Jakób, Ługowski Leonard, Ługowski Maciej, Ługowski Marcin, Ługowski Mateusz, Ługowski, Ługowski Szymon, Ługowski Wincenty, Ługowski Wojciech, Ługowski Jan15 persons on 13 hearths

Fifteen persons on thirteen hearths — and so it should be. The card separates the co-holders with semicolons, and in two places joins two persons by the conjunction „i”: „Jana i Fabiana” and „Wojciecha i Jana”. Of such groups there are exactly thirteen and each has „po 1 dymie”, so those two pairs sit two to a hearth. The surname „Ługowskich” stands once, at the end, and refers to them all. „Stanisławowej” is a form derived from the husband's name — a woman whom the card does not name by a forename of her own; I record her literally in the recorded form of the name and do not expand her, and the surname I leave in the masculine plural from the card („Ługowskich” → Ługowski), because in a collective entry only such a form stands here.
ŁugowskiFabian
T9013 · share of 0.87I) cz. Andrzeja; Antoniego; Fabiana; Jana i Fabiana; Jakóba; Leonarda; Macieja; Marcina; Mateusza; Stanisławowej; Szymona; Wincentego; Wojciecha i Jana – Ługowskich – po 1 dymie; – 13 [dymów wiejskich 2giej klasy]card 3)

the same entry also names: Ługowski Andrzej, Ługowski Antoni, Ługowski Jan, Ługowski Fabian, Ługowski Jakób, Ługowski Leonard, Ługowski Maciej, Ługowski Marcin, Ługowski Mateusz, Ługowski, Ługowski Szymon, Ługowski Wincenty, Ługowski Wojciech, Ługowski Jan15 persons on 13 hearths

Fifteen persons on thirteen hearths — and so it should be. The card separates the co-holders with semicolons, and in two places joins two persons by the conjunction „i”: „Jana i Fabiana” and „Wojciecha i Jana”. Of such groups there are exactly thirteen and each has „po 1 dymie”, so those two pairs sit two to a hearth. The surname „Ługowskich” stands once, at the end, and refers to them all. „Stanisławowej” is a form derived from the husband's name — a woman whom the card does not name by a forename of her own; I record her literally in the recorded form of the name and do not expand her, and the surname I leave in the masculine plural from the card („Ługowskich” → Ługowski), because in a collective entry only such a form stands here.
ŁugowskiFabian
T9013 · share of 0.87I) cz. Andrzeja; Antoniego; Fabiana; Jana i Fabiana; Jakóba; Leonarda; Macieja; Marcina; Mateusza; Stanisławowej; Szymona; Wincentego; Wojciecha i Jana – Ługowskich – po 1 dymie; – 13 [dymów wiejskich 2giej klasy]card 3)

the same entry also names: Ługowski Andrzej, Ługowski Antoni, Ługowski Fabian, Ługowski Jan, Ługowski Jakób, Ługowski Leonard, Ługowski Maciej, Ługowski Marcin, Ługowski Mateusz, Ługowski, Ługowski Szymon, Ługowski Wincenty, Ługowski Wojciech, Ługowski Jan15 persons on 13 hearths

Fifteen persons on thirteen hearths — and so it should be. The card separates the co-holders with semicolons, and in two places joins two persons by the conjunction „i”: „Jana i Fabiana” and „Wojciecha i Jana”. Of such groups there are exactly thirteen and each has „po 1 dymie”, so those two pairs sit two to a hearth. The surname „Ługowskich” stands once, at the end, and refers to them all. „Stanisławowej” is a form derived from the husband's name — a woman whom the card does not name by a forename of her own; I record her literally in the recorded form of the name and do not expand her, and the surname I leave in the masculine plural from the card („Ługowskich” → Ługowski), because in a collective entry only such a form stands here.
ŁugowskiJakub
T9013 · share of 0.87I) cz. Andrzeja; Antoniego; Fabiana; Jana i Fabiana; Jakóba; Leonarda; Macieja; Marcina; Mateusza; Stanisławowej; Szymona; Wincentego; Wojciecha i Jana – Ługowskich – po 1 dymie; – 13 [dymów wiejskich 2giej klasy]card 3)

the same entry also names: Ługowski Andrzej, Ługowski Antoni, Ługowski Fabian, Ługowski Jan, Ługowski Fabian, Ługowski Leonard, Ługowski Maciej, Ługowski Marcin, Ługowski Mateusz, Ługowski, Ługowski Szymon, Ługowski Wincenty, Ługowski Wojciech, Ługowski Jan15 persons on 13 hearths

Fifteen persons on thirteen hearths — and so it should be. The card separates the co-holders with semicolons, and in two places joins two persons by the conjunction „i”: „Jana i Fabiana” and „Wojciecha i Jana”. Of such groups there are exactly thirteen and each has „po 1 dymie”, so those two pairs sit two to a hearth. The surname „Ługowskich” stands once, at the end, and refers to them all. „Stanisławowej” is a form derived from the husband's name — a woman whom the card does not name by a forename of her own; I record her literally in the recorded form of the name and do not expand her, and the surname I leave in the masculine plural from the card („Ługowskich” → Ługowski), because in a collective entry only such a form stands here.
ŁugowskiJan
T9013 · share of 0.87I) cz. Andrzeja; Antoniego; Fabiana; Jana i Fabiana; Jakóba; Leonarda; Macieja; Marcina; Mateusza; Stanisławowej; Szymona; Wincentego; Wojciecha i Jana – Ługowskich – po 1 dymie; – 13 [dymów wiejskich 2giej klasy]card 3)

the same entry also names: Ługowski Andrzej, Ługowski Antoni, Ługowski Fabian, Ługowski Fabian, Ługowski Jakób, Ługowski Leonard, Ługowski Maciej, Ługowski Marcin, Ługowski Mateusz, Ługowski, Ługowski Szymon, Ługowski Wincenty, Ługowski Wojciech, Ługowski Jan15 persons on 13 hearths

Fifteen persons on thirteen hearths — and so it should be. The card separates the co-holders with semicolons, and in two places joins two persons by the conjunction „i”: „Jana i Fabiana” and „Wojciecha i Jana”. Of such groups there are exactly thirteen and each has „po 1 dymie”, so those two pairs sit two to a hearth. The surname „Ługowskich” stands once, at the end, and refers to them all. „Stanisławowej” is a form derived from the husband's name — a woman whom the card does not name by a forename of her own; I record her literally in the recorded form of the name and do not expand her, and the surname I leave in the masculine plural from the card („Ługowskich” → Ługowski), because in a collective entry only such a form stands here.
ŁugowskiJan
T9013 · share of 0.87I) cz. Andrzeja; Antoniego; Fabiana; Jana i Fabiana; Jakóba; Leonarda; Macieja; Marcina; Mateusza; Stanisławowej; Szymona; Wincentego; Wojciecha i Jana – Ługowskich – po 1 dymie; – 13 [dymów wiejskich 2giej klasy]card 3)

the same entry also names: Ługowski Andrzej, Ługowski Antoni, Ługowski Fabian, Ługowski Jan, Ługowski Fabian, Ługowski Jakób, Ługowski Leonard, Ługowski Maciej, Ługowski Marcin, Ługowski Mateusz, Ługowski, Ługowski Szymon, Ługowski Wincenty, Ługowski Wojciech15 persons on 13 hearths

Fifteen persons on thirteen hearths — and so it should be. The card separates the co-holders with semicolons, and in two places joins two persons by the conjunction „i”: „Jana i Fabiana” and „Wojciecha i Jana”. Of such groups there are exactly thirteen and each has „po 1 dymie”, so those two pairs sit two to a hearth. The surname „Ługowskich” stands once, at the end, and refers to them all. „Stanisławowej” is a form derived from the husband's name — a woman whom the card does not name by a forename of her own; I record her literally in the recorded form of the name and do not expand her, and the surname I leave in the masculine plural from the card („Ługowskich” → Ługowski), because in a collective entry only such a form stands here.
ŁugowskiLeonard«Kępia»
T9013 · share of 0.87I) cz. Andrzeja; Antoniego; Fabiana; Jana i Fabiana; Jakóba; Leonarda; Macieja; Marcina; Mateusza; Stanisławowej; Szymona; Wincentego; Wojciecha i Jana – Ługowskich – po 1 dymie; – 13 [dymów wiejskich 2giej klasy]card 3)

the same entry also names: Ługowski Andrzej, Ługowski Antoni, Ługowski Fabian, Ługowski Jan, Ługowski Fabian, Ługowski Jakób, Ługowski Maciej, Ługowski Marcin, Ługowski Mateusz, Ługowski, Ługowski Szymon, Ługowski Wincenty, Ługowski Wojciech, Ługowski Jan15 persons on 13 hearths

Fifteen persons on thirteen hearths — and so it should be. The card separates the co-holders with semicolons, and in two places joins two persons by the conjunction „i”: „Jana i Fabiana” and „Wojciecha i Jana”. Of such groups there are exactly thirteen and each has „po 1 dymie”, so those two pairs sit two to a hearth. The surname „Ługowskich” stands once, at the end, and refers to them all. „Stanisławowej” is a form derived from the husband's name — a woman whom the card does not name by a forename of her own; I record her literally in the recorded form of the name and do not expand her, and the surname I leave in the masculine plural from the card („Ługowskich” → Ługowski), because in a collective entry only such a form stands here.
ŁugowskiMaciej«Krolik»
T9013 · share of 0.87I) cz. Andrzeja; Antoniego; Fabiana; Jana i Fabiana; Jakóba; Leonarda; Macieja; Marcina; Mateusza; Stanisławowej; Szymona; Wincentego; Wojciecha i Jana – Ługowskich – po 1 dymie; – 13 [dymów wiejskich 2giej klasy]card 3)

the same entry also names: Ługowski Andrzej, Ługowski Antoni, Ługowski Fabian, Ługowski Jan, Ługowski Fabian, Ługowski Jakób, Ługowski Leonard, Ługowski Marcin, Ługowski Mateusz, Ługowski, Ługowski Szymon, Ługowski Wincenty, Ługowski Wojciech, Ługowski Jan15 persons on 13 hearths

Fifteen persons on thirteen hearths — and so it should be. The card separates the co-holders with semicolons, and in two places joins two persons by the conjunction „i”: „Jana i Fabiana” and „Wojciecha i Jana”. Of such groups there are exactly thirteen and each has „po 1 dymie”, so those two pairs sit two to a hearth. The surname „Ługowskich” stands once, at the end, and refers to them all. „Stanisławowej” is a form derived from the husband's name — a woman whom the card does not name by a forename of her own; I record her literally in the recorded form of the name and do not expand her, and the surname I leave in the masculine plural from the card („Ługowskich” → Ługowski), because in a collective entry only such a form stands here.
ŁugowskiMarcin«Wyszek»
T9013 · share of 0.87I) cz. Andrzeja; Antoniego; Fabiana; Jana i Fabiana; Jakóba; Leonarda; Macieja; Marcina; Mateusza; Stanisławowej; Szymona; Wincentego; Wojciecha i Jana – Ługowskich – po 1 dymie; – 13 [dymów wiejskich 2giej klasy]card 3)

the same entry also names: Ługowski Andrzej, Ługowski Antoni, Ługowski Fabian, Ługowski Jan, Ługowski Fabian, Ługowski Jakób, Ługowski Leonard, Ługowski Maciej, Ługowski Mateusz, Ługowski, Ługowski Szymon, Ługowski Wincenty, Ługowski Wojciech, Ługowski Jan15 persons on 13 hearths

Fifteen persons on thirteen hearths — and so it should be. The card separates the co-holders with semicolons, and in two places joins two persons by the conjunction „i”: „Jana i Fabiana” and „Wojciecha i Jana”. Of such groups there are exactly thirteen and each has „po 1 dymie”, so those two pairs sit two to a hearth. The surname „Ługowskich” stands once, at the end, and refers to them all. „Stanisławowej” is a form derived from the husband's name — a woman whom the card does not name by a forename of her own; I record her literally in the recorded form of the name and do not expand her, and the surname I leave in the masculine plural from the card („Ługowskich” → Ługowski), because in a collective entry only such a form stands here.
ŁugowskiMateusz
T9013 · share of 0.87I) cz. Andrzeja; Antoniego; Fabiana; Jana i Fabiana; Jakóba; Leonarda; Macieja; Marcina; Mateusza; Stanisławowej; Szymona; Wincentego; Wojciecha i Jana – Ługowskich – po 1 dymie; – 13 [dymów wiejskich 2giej klasy]card 3)

the same entry also names: Ługowski Andrzej, Ługowski Antoni, Ługowski Fabian, Ługowski Jan, Ługowski Fabian, Ługowski Jakób, Ługowski Leonard, Ługowski Maciej, Ługowski Marcin, Ługowski, Ługowski Szymon, Ługowski Wincenty, Ługowski Wojciech, Ługowski Jan15 persons on 13 hearths

Fifteen persons on thirteen hearths — and so it should be. The card separates the co-holders with semicolons, and in two places joins two persons by the conjunction „i”: „Jana i Fabiana” and „Wojciecha i Jana”. Of such groups there are exactly thirteen and each has „po 1 dymie”, so those two pairs sit two to a hearth. The surname „Ługowskich” stands once, at the end, and refers to them all. „Stanisławowej” is a form derived from the husband's name — a woman whom the card does not name by a forename of her own; I record her literally in the recorded form of the name and do not expand her, and the surname I leave in the masculine plural from the card („Ługowskich” → Ługowski), because in a collective entry only such a form stands here.
ŁugowskiSzymon«Panoszek»
T9013 · share of 0.87I) cz. Andrzeja; Antoniego; Fabiana; Jana i Fabiana; Jakóba; Leonarda; Macieja; Marcina; Mateusza; Stanisławowej; Szymona; Wincentego; Wojciecha i Jana – Ługowskich – po 1 dymie; – 13 [dymów wiejskich 2giej klasy]card 3)

the same entry also names: Ługowski Andrzej, Ługowski Antoni, Ługowski Fabian, Ługowski Jan, Ługowski Fabian, Ługowski Jakób, Ługowski Leonard, Ługowski Maciej, Ługowski Marcin, Ługowski Mateusz, Ługowski, Ługowski Wincenty, Ługowski Wojciech, Ługowski Jan15 persons on 13 hearths

Fifteen persons on thirteen hearths — and so it should be. The card separates the co-holders with semicolons, and in two places joins two persons by the conjunction „i”: „Jana i Fabiana” and „Wojciecha i Jana”. Of such groups there are exactly thirteen and each has „po 1 dymie”, so those two pairs sit two to a hearth. The surname „Ługowskich” stands once, at the end, and refers to them all. „Stanisławowej” is a form derived from the husband's name — a woman whom the card does not name by a forename of her own; I record her literally in the recorded form of the name and do not expand her, and the surname I leave in the masculine plural from the card („Ługowskich” → Ługowski), because in a collective entry only such a form stands here.
ŁugowskiWincenty
T9013 · share of 0.87I) cz. Andrzeja; Antoniego; Fabiana; Jana i Fabiana; Jakóba; Leonarda; Macieja; Marcina; Mateusza; Stanisławowej; Szymona; Wincentego; Wojciecha i Jana – Ługowskich – po 1 dymie; – 13 [dymów wiejskich 2giej klasy]card 3)

the same entry also names: Ługowski Andrzej, Ługowski Antoni, Ługowski Fabian, Ługowski Jan, Ługowski Fabian, Ługowski Jakób, Ługowski Leonard, Ługowski Maciej, Ługowski Marcin, Ługowski Mateusz, Ługowski, Ługowski Szymon, Ługowski Wojciech, Ługowski Jan15 persons on 13 hearths

Fifteen persons on thirteen hearths — and so it should be. The card separates the co-holders with semicolons, and in two places joins two persons by the conjunction „i”: „Jana i Fabiana” and „Wojciecha i Jana”. Of such groups there are exactly thirteen and each has „po 1 dymie”, so those two pairs sit two to a hearth. The surname „Ługowskich” stands once, at the end, and refers to them all. „Stanisławowej” is a form derived from the husband's name — a woman whom the card does not name by a forename of her own; I record her literally in the recorded form of the name and do not expand her, and the surname I leave in the masculine plural from the card („Ługowskich” → Ługowski), because in a collective entry only such a form stands here.
ŁugowskiWojciech
T9013 · share of 0.87I) cz. Andrzeja; Antoniego; Fabiana; Jana i Fabiana; Jakóba; Leonarda; Macieja; Marcina; Mateusza; Stanisławowej; Szymona; Wincentego; Wojciecha i Jana – Ługowskich – po 1 dymie; – 13 [dymów wiejskich 2giej klasy]card 3)

the same entry also names: Ługowski Andrzej, Ługowski Antoni, Ługowski Fabian, Ługowski Jan, Ługowski Fabian, Ługowski Jakób, Ługowski Leonard, Ługowski Maciej, Ługowski Marcin, Ługowski Mateusz, Ługowski, Ługowski Szymon, Ługowski Wincenty, Ługowski Jan15 persons on 13 hearths

Fifteen persons on thirteen hearths — and so it should be. The card separates the co-holders with semicolons, and in two places joins two persons by the conjunction „i”: „Jana i Fabiana” and „Wojciecha i Jana”. Of such groups there are exactly thirteen and each has „po 1 dymie”, so those two pairs sit two to a hearth. The surname „Ługowskich” stands once, at the end, and refers to them all. „Stanisławowej” is a form derived from the husband's name — a woman whom the card does not name by a forename of her own; I record her literally in the recorded form of the name and do not expand her, and the surname I leave in the masculine plural from the card („Ługowskich” → Ługowski), because in a collective entry only such a form stands here.

1794 T94Hearth tax register 1794

LipińskiAntoni
T942 · share of 1cz. Antoniego po Piotrze Lipińskim 2 d.;card 5)

the same entry also names: Lipiński Piotr2 persons on 2 hearths

The same holding as T90, entry A („cz. Antoniego syna Piotra Lepińskiego”). Here the surname is written clearly with an „i” („Lipińskim”), on card 2) the second letter reads as an „e” („Lepińskiego”) — both forms are recorded; I do not merge them. The phrase „po Piotrze” indicates that Piotr is already dead and that Antoni took over the holding after him; in T90 the same Piotr is only a description of descent („syna Piotra”) and the card there says nothing of his death. The writing „cz. Antoniego po Piotrze Lipińskim” says that the holding passed after Piotr to Antoni, but it does not call Piotr dead (there is no „sukces.”, no „niegdy” and no „ś.p.”). The marker of death is therefore not set — just as at „Andrzeja po Szymonie” in Ługi Rendki.
LipińskiPiotr
T942 · share of 1cz. Antoniego po Piotrze Lipińskim 2 d.;card 5)

the same entry also names: Lipiński Antoni2 persons on 2 hearths

The same holding as T90, entry A („cz. Antoniego syna Piotra Lepińskiego”). Here the surname is written clearly with an „i” („Lipińskim”), on card 2) the second letter reads as an „e” („Lepińskiego”) — both forms are recorded; I do not merge them. The phrase „po Piotrze” indicates that Piotr is already dead and that Antoni took over the holding after him; in T90 the same Piotr is only a description of descent („syna Piotra”) and the card there says nothing of his death. The writing „cz. Antoniego po Piotrze Lipińskim” says that the holding passed after Piotr to Antoni, but it does not call Piotr dead (there is no „sukces.”, no „niegdy” and no „ś.p.”). The marker of death is therefore not set — just as at „Andrzeja po Szymonie” in Ługi Rendki.
JezewskiStanisław
T941 hearthcz. Stanisława Jezewskiego 1 d.;card 5)
The writing „Jezewskiego” (without a dot over the „z”). The surname is close to, but not identical with, the „Jezowski” of Mateusz from T75, entry 10, and T89, entry 7 — there „o”, here „e”; this is most likely one family, but the card does not allow it to be settled, and the forenames are different. Cf. also the writing of the same holding in T90, entry B (card 2).
ŁugowskiAndrzej
T9414 · share of 0.88cz. Jana i Wojciecha, Stanisława, Szymona, Macieja, Mateusza sukcesorów po Jadwidze, Fabjana, Antoniego, Leona, Jana i Fabjana, Wincentego, Marcina, Jakóba, Andrzeja, Ługowskich – po 1 dymie – 14 dymów;card 5)

the same entry also names: Ługowski Jan, Ługowski Wojciech, Ługowski Stanisław, Ługowski Szymon, Ługowski Maciej, Ługowski Mateusz, Ługowski Jadwiga †, Ługowski Fabjan, Ługowski Antoni, Ługowski Leon, Ługowski Jan, Ługowski Fabjan, Ługowski Wincenty, Ługowski Marcin, Ługowski Jakób16 persons on 14 hearths

Sixteen persons on fourteen hearths, and so it should be: the card separates the joint holders with commas, and joins two pairs with the conjunction „i” — „Jana i Wojciecha” and „Jana i Fabjana” — so these pairs sit two to a hearth. The units come to exactly fourteen. „sukcesorów po Jadwidze” is a unit of its own: Jadwiga is no longer alive (the mark for a deceased person), and her succession holds the hearth; in T90 (card 3), entry H) the same holding stands separately as 1 hearth held by Antoni Borkowski. The figure „14” has been corrected on the card — the four written over an earlier digit [reading uncertain as to what stood underneath]; above the word „Ługowskich” stands a superscript „2” of undetermined meaning. I record the surname in the masculine plural of the card („Ługowskich” → Ługowski), because in a collective entry there is no other form.
ŁugowskiAntoni«Kępia»
T9414 · share of 0.88cz. Jana i Wojciecha, Stanisława, Szymona, Macieja, Mateusza sukcesorów po Jadwidze, Fabjana, Antoniego, Leona, Jana i Fabjana, Wincentego, Marcina, Jakóba, Andrzeja, Ługowskich – po 1 dymie – 14 dymów;card 5)

the same entry also names: Ługowski Jan, Ługowski Wojciech, Ługowski Stanisław, Ługowski Szymon, Ługowski Maciej, Ługowski Mateusz, Ługowski Jadwiga †, Ługowski Fabjan, Ługowski Leon, Ługowski Jan, Ługowski Fabjan, Ługowski Wincenty, Ługowski Marcin, Ługowski Jakób, Ługowski Andrzej16 persons on 14 hearths

Sixteen persons on fourteen hearths, and so it should be: the card separates the joint holders with commas, and joins two pairs with the conjunction „i” — „Jana i Wojciecha” and „Jana i Fabjana” — so these pairs sit two to a hearth. The units come to exactly fourteen. „sukcesorów po Jadwidze” is a unit of its own: Jadwiga is no longer alive (the mark for a deceased person), and her succession holds the hearth; in T90 (card 3), entry H) the same holding stands separately as 1 hearth held by Antoni Borkowski. The figure „14” has been corrected on the card — the four written over an earlier digit [reading uncertain as to what stood underneath]; above the word „Ługowskich” stands a superscript „2” of undetermined meaning. I record the surname in the masculine plural of the card („Ługowskich” → Ługowski), because in a collective entry there is no other form.
ŁugowskiFabjan
T9414 · share of 0.88cz. Jana i Wojciecha, Stanisława, Szymona, Macieja, Mateusza sukcesorów po Jadwidze, Fabjana, Antoniego, Leona, Jana i Fabjana, Wincentego, Marcina, Jakóba, Andrzeja, Ługowskich – po 1 dymie – 14 dymów;card 5)

the same entry also names: Ługowski Jan, Ługowski Wojciech, Ługowski Stanisław, Ługowski Szymon, Ługowski Maciej, Ługowski Mateusz, Ługowski Jadwiga †, Ługowski Antoni, Ługowski Leon, Ługowski Jan, Ługowski Fabjan, Ługowski Wincenty, Ługowski Marcin, Ługowski Jakób, Ługowski Andrzej16 persons on 14 hearths

Sixteen persons on fourteen hearths, and so it should be: the card separates the joint holders with commas, and joins two pairs with the conjunction „i” — „Jana i Wojciecha” and „Jana i Fabjana” — so these pairs sit two to a hearth. The units come to exactly fourteen. „sukcesorów po Jadwidze” is a unit of its own: Jadwiga is no longer alive (the mark for a deceased person), and her succession holds the hearth; in T90 (card 3), entry H) the same holding stands separately as 1 hearth held by Antoni Borkowski. The figure „14” has been corrected on the card — the four written over an earlier digit [reading uncertain as to what stood underneath]; above the word „Ługowskich” stands a superscript „2” of undetermined meaning. I record the surname in the masculine plural of the card („Ługowskich” → Ługowski), because in a collective entry there is no other form.
ŁugowskiFabjan
T9414 · share of 0.88cz. Jana i Wojciecha, Stanisława, Szymona, Macieja, Mateusza sukcesorów po Jadwidze, Fabjana, Antoniego, Leona, Jana i Fabjana, Wincentego, Marcina, Jakóba, Andrzeja, Ługowskich – po 1 dymie – 14 dymów;card 5)

the same entry also names: Ługowski Jan, Ługowski Wojciech, Ługowski Stanisław, Ługowski Szymon, Ługowski Maciej, Ługowski Mateusz, Ługowski Jadwiga †, Ługowski Fabjan, Ługowski Antoni, Ługowski Leon, Ługowski Jan, Ługowski Wincenty, Ługowski Marcin, Ługowski Jakób, Ługowski Andrzej16 persons on 14 hearths

Sixteen persons on fourteen hearths, and so it should be: the card separates the joint holders with commas, and joins two pairs with the conjunction „i” — „Jana i Wojciecha” and „Jana i Fabjana” — so these pairs sit two to a hearth. The units come to exactly fourteen. „sukcesorów po Jadwidze” is a unit of its own: Jadwiga is no longer alive (the mark for a deceased person), and her succession holds the hearth; in T90 (card 3), entry H) the same holding stands separately as 1 hearth held by Antoni Borkowski. The figure „14” has been corrected on the card — the four written over an earlier digit [reading uncertain as to what stood underneath]; above the word „Ługowskich” stands a superscript „2” of undetermined meaning. I record the surname in the masculine plural of the card („Ługowskich” → Ługowski), because in a collective entry there is no other form.
ŁugowskaJadwiga†
T9414 · share of 0.88successors† deceasedcz. Jana i Wojciecha, Stanisława, Szymona, Macieja, Mateusza sukcesorów po Jadwidze, Fabjana, Antoniego, Leona, Jana i Fabjana, Wincentego, Marcina, Jakóba, Andrzeja, Ługowskich – po 1 dymie – 14 dymów;card 5)

the same entry also names: Ługowski Jan, Ługowski Wojciech, Ługowski Stanisław, Ługowski Szymon, Ługowski Maciej, Ługowski Mateusz, Ługowski Fabjan, Ługowski Antoni, Ługowski Leon, Ługowski Jan, Ługowski Fabjan, Ługowski Wincenty, Ługowski Marcin, Ługowski Jakób, Ługowski Andrzej16 persons on 14 hearths

Sixteen persons on fourteen hearths, and so it should be: the card separates the joint holders with commas, and joins two pairs with the conjunction „i” — „Jana i Wojciecha” and „Jana i Fabjana” — so these pairs sit two to a hearth. The units come to exactly fourteen. „sukcesorów po Jadwidze” is a unit of its own: Jadwiga is no longer alive (the mark for a deceased person), and her succession holds the hearth; in T90 (card 3), entry H) the same holding stands separately as 1 hearth held by Antoni Borkowski. The figure „14” has been corrected on the card — the four written over an earlier digit [reading uncertain as to what stood underneath]; above the word „Ługowskich” stands a superscript „2” of undetermined meaning. I record the surname in the masculine plural of the card („Ługowskich” → Ługowski), because in a collective entry there is no other form.
ŁugowskiJakub
T9414 · share of 0.88cz. Jana i Wojciecha, Stanisława, Szymona, Macieja, Mateusza sukcesorów po Jadwidze, Fabjana, Antoniego, Leona, Jana i Fabjana, Wincentego, Marcina, Jakóba, Andrzeja, Ługowskich – po 1 dymie – 14 dymów;card 5)

the same entry also names: Ługowski Jan, Ługowski Wojciech, Ługowski Stanisław, Ługowski Szymon, Ługowski Maciej, Ługowski Mateusz, Ługowski Jadwiga †, Ługowski Fabjan, Ługowski Antoni, Ługowski Leon, Ługowski Jan, Ługowski Fabjan, Ługowski Wincenty, Ługowski Marcin, Ługowski Andrzej16 persons on 14 hearths

Sixteen persons on fourteen hearths, and so it should be: the card separates the joint holders with commas, and joins two pairs with the conjunction „i” — „Jana i Wojciecha” and „Jana i Fabjana” — so these pairs sit two to a hearth. The units come to exactly fourteen. „sukcesorów po Jadwidze” is a unit of its own: Jadwiga is no longer alive (the mark for a deceased person), and her succession holds the hearth; in T90 (card 3), entry H) the same holding stands separately as 1 hearth held by Antoni Borkowski. The figure „14” has been corrected on the card — the four written over an earlier digit [reading uncertain as to what stood underneath]; above the word „Ługowskich” stands a superscript „2” of undetermined meaning. I record the surname in the masculine plural of the card („Ługowskich” → Ługowski), because in a collective entry there is no other form.
ŁugowskiJan
T9414 · share of 0.88cz. Jana i Wojciecha, Stanisława, Szymona, Macieja, Mateusza sukcesorów po Jadwidze, Fabjana, Antoniego, Leona, Jana i Fabjana, Wincentego, Marcina, Jakóba, Andrzeja, Ługowskich – po 1 dymie – 14 dymów;card 5)

the same entry also names: Ługowski Wojciech, Ługowski Stanisław, Ługowski Szymon, Ługowski Maciej, Ługowski Mateusz, Ługowski Jadwiga †, Ługowski Fabjan, Ługowski Antoni, Ługowski Leon, Ługowski Jan, Ługowski Fabjan, Ługowski Wincenty, Ługowski Marcin, Ługowski Jakób, Ługowski Andrzej16 persons on 14 hearths

Sixteen persons on fourteen hearths, and so it should be: the card separates the joint holders with commas, and joins two pairs with the conjunction „i” — „Jana i Wojciecha” and „Jana i Fabjana” — so these pairs sit two to a hearth. The units come to exactly fourteen. „sukcesorów po Jadwidze” is a unit of its own: Jadwiga is no longer alive (the mark for a deceased person), and her succession holds the hearth; in T90 (card 3), entry H) the same holding stands separately as 1 hearth held by Antoni Borkowski. The figure „14” has been corrected on the card — the four written over an earlier digit [reading uncertain as to what stood underneath]; above the word „Ługowskich” stands a superscript „2” of undetermined meaning. I record the surname in the masculine plural of the card („Ługowskich” → Ługowski), because in a collective entry there is no other form.
ŁugowskiJan
T9414 · share of 0.88cz. Jana i Wojciecha, Stanisława, Szymona, Macieja, Mateusza sukcesorów po Jadwidze, Fabjana, Antoniego, Leona, Jana i Fabjana, Wincentego, Marcina, Jakóba, Andrzeja, Ługowskich – po 1 dymie – 14 dymów;card 5)

the same entry also names: Ługowski Jan, Ługowski Wojciech, Ługowski Stanisław, Ługowski Szymon, Ługowski Maciej, Ługowski Mateusz, Ługowski Jadwiga †, Ługowski Fabjan, Ługowski Antoni, Ługowski Leon, Ługowski Fabjan, Ługowski Wincenty, Ługowski Marcin, Ługowski Jakób, Ługowski Andrzej16 persons on 14 hearths

Sixteen persons on fourteen hearths, and so it should be: the card separates the joint holders with commas, and joins two pairs with the conjunction „i” — „Jana i Wojciecha” and „Jana i Fabjana” — so these pairs sit two to a hearth. The units come to exactly fourteen. „sukcesorów po Jadwidze” is a unit of its own: Jadwiga is no longer alive (the mark for a deceased person), and her succession holds the hearth; in T90 (card 3), entry H) the same holding stands separately as 1 hearth held by Antoni Borkowski. The figure „14” has been corrected on the card — the four written over an earlier digit [reading uncertain as to what stood underneath]; above the word „Ługowskich” stands a superscript „2” of undetermined meaning. I record the surname in the masculine plural of the card („Ługowskich” → Ługowski), because in a collective entry there is no other form.
ŁugowskiLeon
T9414 · share of 0.88cz. Jana i Wojciecha, Stanisława, Szymona, Macieja, Mateusza sukcesorów po Jadwidze, Fabjana, Antoniego, Leona, Jana i Fabjana, Wincentego, Marcina, Jakóba, Andrzeja, Ługowskich – po 1 dymie – 14 dymów;card 5)

the same entry also names: Ługowski Jan, Ługowski Wojciech, Ługowski Stanisław, Ługowski Szymon, Ługowski Maciej, Ługowski Mateusz, Ługowski Jadwiga †, Ługowski Fabjan, Ługowski Antoni, Ługowski Jan, Ługowski Fabjan, Ługowski Wincenty, Ługowski Marcin, Ługowski Jakób, Ługowski Andrzej16 persons on 14 hearths

Sixteen persons on fourteen hearths, and so it should be: the card separates the joint holders with commas, and joins two pairs with the conjunction „i” — „Jana i Wojciecha” and „Jana i Fabjana” — so these pairs sit two to a hearth. The units come to exactly fourteen. „sukcesorów po Jadwidze” is a unit of its own: Jadwiga is no longer alive (the mark for a deceased person), and her succession holds the hearth; in T90 (card 3), entry H) the same holding stands separately as 1 hearth held by Antoni Borkowski. The figure „14” has been corrected on the card — the four written over an earlier digit [reading uncertain as to what stood underneath]; above the word „Ługowskich” stands a superscript „2” of undetermined meaning. I record the surname in the masculine plural of the card („Ługowskich” → Ługowski), because in a collective entry there is no other form.
ŁugowskiMaciej«Krolik»
T9414 · share of 0.88cz. Jana i Wojciecha, Stanisława, Szymona, Macieja, Mateusza sukcesorów po Jadwidze, Fabjana, Antoniego, Leona, Jana i Fabjana, Wincentego, Marcina, Jakóba, Andrzeja, Ługowskich – po 1 dymie – 14 dymów;card 5)

the same entry also names: Ługowski Jan, Ługowski Wojciech, Ługowski Stanisław, Ługowski Szymon, Ługowski Mateusz, Ługowski Jadwiga †, Ługowski Fabjan, Ługowski Antoni, Ługowski Leon, Ługowski Jan, Ługowski Fabjan, Ługowski Wincenty, Ługowski Marcin, Ługowski Jakób, Ługowski Andrzej16 persons on 14 hearths

Sixteen persons on fourteen hearths, and so it should be: the card separates the joint holders with commas, and joins two pairs with the conjunction „i” — „Jana i Wojciecha” and „Jana i Fabjana” — so these pairs sit two to a hearth. The units come to exactly fourteen. „sukcesorów po Jadwidze” is a unit of its own: Jadwiga is no longer alive (the mark for a deceased person), and her succession holds the hearth; in T90 (card 3), entry H) the same holding stands separately as 1 hearth held by Antoni Borkowski. The figure „14” has been corrected on the card — the four written over an earlier digit [reading uncertain as to what stood underneath]; above the word „Ługowskich” stands a superscript „2” of undetermined meaning. I record the surname in the masculine plural of the card („Ługowskich” → Ługowski), because in a collective entry there is no other form.
ŁugowskiMarcin«Wyszek»
T9414 · share of 0.88cz. Jana i Wojciecha, Stanisława, Szymona, Macieja, Mateusza sukcesorów po Jadwidze, Fabjana, Antoniego, Leona, Jana i Fabjana, Wincentego, Marcina, Jakóba, Andrzeja, Ługowskich – po 1 dymie – 14 dymów;card 5)

the same entry also names: Ługowski Jan, Ługowski Wojciech, Ługowski Stanisław, Ługowski Szymon, Ługowski Maciej, Ługowski Mateusz, Ługowski Jadwiga †, Ługowski Fabjan, Ługowski Antoni, Ługowski Leon, Ługowski Jan, Ługowski Fabjan, Ługowski Wincenty, Ługowski Jakób, Ługowski Andrzej16 persons on 14 hearths

Sixteen persons on fourteen hearths, and so it should be: the card separates the joint holders with commas, and joins two pairs with the conjunction „i” — „Jana i Wojciecha” and „Jana i Fabjana” — so these pairs sit two to a hearth. The units come to exactly fourteen. „sukcesorów po Jadwidze” is a unit of its own: Jadwiga is no longer alive (the mark for a deceased person), and her succession holds the hearth; in T90 (card 3), entry H) the same holding stands separately as 1 hearth held by Antoni Borkowski. The figure „14” has been corrected on the card — the four written over an earlier digit [reading uncertain as to what stood underneath]; above the word „Ługowskich” stands a superscript „2” of undetermined meaning. I record the surname in the masculine plural of the card („Ługowskich” → Ługowski), because in a collective entry there is no other form.
ŁugowskiMateusz
T9414 · share of 0.88cz. Jana i Wojciecha, Stanisława, Szymona, Macieja, Mateusza sukcesorów po Jadwidze, Fabjana, Antoniego, Leona, Jana i Fabjana, Wincentego, Marcina, Jakóba, Andrzeja, Ługowskich – po 1 dymie – 14 dymów;card 5)

the same entry also names: Ługowski Jan, Ługowski Wojciech, Ługowski Stanisław, Ługowski Szymon, Ługowski Maciej, Ługowski Jadwiga †, Ługowski Fabjan, Ługowski Antoni, Ługowski Leon, Ługowski Jan, Ługowski Fabjan, Ługowski Wincenty, Ługowski Marcin, Ługowski Jakób, Ługowski Andrzej16 persons on 14 hearths

Sixteen persons on fourteen hearths, and so it should be: the card separates the joint holders with commas, and joins two pairs with the conjunction „i” — „Jana i Wojciecha” and „Jana i Fabjana” — so these pairs sit two to a hearth. The units come to exactly fourteen. „sukcesorów po Jadwidze” is a unit of its own: Jadwiga is no longer alive (the mark for a deceased person), and her succession holds the hearth; in T90 (card 3), entry H) the same holding stands separately as 1 hearth held by Antoni Borkowski. The figure „14” has been corrected on the card — the four written over an earlier digit [reading uncertain as to what stood underneath]; above the word „Ługowskich” stands a superscript „2” of undetermined meaning. I record the surname in the masculine plural of the card („Ługowskich” → Ługowski), because in a collective entry there is no other form.
ŁugowskiStanisław«Krolik»
T9414 · share of 0.88cz. Jana i Wojciecha, Stanisława, Szymona, Macieja, Mateusza sukcesorów po Jadwidze, Fabjana, Antoniego, Leona, Jana i Fabjana, Wincentego, Marcina, Jakóba, Andrzeja, Ługowskich – po 1 dymie – 14 dymów;card 5)

the same entry also names: Ługowski Jan, Ługowski Wojciech, Ługowski Szymon, Ługowski Maciej, Ługowski Mateusz, Ługowski Jadwiga †, Ługowski Fabjan, Ługowski Antoni, Ługowski Leon, Ługowski Jan, Ługowski Fabjan, Ługowski Wincenty, Ługowski Marcin, Ługowski Jakób, Ługowski Andrzej16 persons on 14 hearths

Sixteen persons on fourteen hearths, and so it should be: the card separates the joint holders with commas, and joins two pairs with the conjunction „i” — „Jana i Wojciecha” and „Jana i Fabjana” — so these pairs sit two to a hearth. The units come to exactly fourteen. „sukcesorów po Jadwidze” is a unit of its own: Jadwiga is no longer alive (the mark for a deceased person), and her succession holds the hearth; in T90 (card 3), entry H) the same holding stands separately as 1 hearth held by Antoni Borkowski. The figure „14” has been corrected on the card — the four written over an earlier digit [reading uncertain as to what stood underneath]; above the word „Ługowskich” stands a superscript „2” of undetermined meaning. I record the surname in the masculine plural of the card („Ługowskich” → Ługowski), because in a collective entry there is no other form.
ŁugowskiSzymon«Panoszek»
T9414 · share of 0.88cz. Jana i Wojciecha, Stanisława, Szymona, Macieja, Mateusza sukcesorów po Jadwidze, Fabjana, Antoniego, Leona, Jana i Fabjana, Wincentego, Marcina, Jakóba, Andrzeja, Ługowskich – po 1 dymie – 14 dymów;card 5)

the same entry also names: Ługowski Jan, Ługowski Wojciech, Ługowski Stanisław, Ługowski Maciej, Ługowski Mateusz, Ługowski Jadwiga †, Ługowski Fabjan, Ługowski Antoni, Ługowski Leon, Ługowski Jan, Ługowski Fabjan, Ługowski Wincenty, Ługowski Marcin, Ługowski Jakób, Ługowski Andrzej16 persons on 14 hearths

Sixteen persons on fourteen hearths, and so it should be: the card separates the joint holders with commas, and joins two pairs with the conjunction „i” — „Jana i Wojciecha” and „Jana i Fabjana” — so these pairs sit two to a hearth. The units come to exactly fourteen. „sukcesorów po Jadwidze” is a unit of its own: Jadwiga is no longer alive (the mark for a deceased person), and her succession holds the hearth; in T90 (card 3), entry H) the same holding stands separately as 1 hearth held by Antoni Borkowski. The figure „14” has been corrected on the card — the four written over an earlier digit [reading uncertain as to what stood underneath]; above the word „Ługowskich” stands a superscript „2” of undetermined meaning. I record the surname in the masculine plural of the card („Ługowskich” → Ługowski), because in a collective entry there is no other form.
ŁugowskiWincenty
T9414 · share of 0.88cz. Jana i Wojciecha, Stanisława, Szymona, Macieja, Mateusza sukcesorów po Jadwidze, Fabjana, Antoniego, Leona, Jana i Fabjana, Wincentego, Marcina, Jakóba, Andrzeja, Ługowskich – po 1 dymie – 14 dymów;card 5)

the same entry also names: Ługowski Jan, Ługowski Wojciech, Ługowski Stanisław, Ługowski Szymon, Ługowski Maciej, Ługowski Mateusz, Ługowski Jadwiga †, Ługowski Fabjan, Ługowski Antoni, Ługowski Leon, Ługowski Jan, Ługowski Fabjan, Ługowski Marcin, Ługowski Jakób, Ługowski Andrzej16 persons on 14 hearths

Sixteen persons on fourteen hearths, and so it should be: the card separates the joint holders with commas, and joins two pairs with the conjunction „i” — „Jana i Wojciecha” and „Jana i Fabjana” — so these pairs sit two to a hearth. The units come to exactly fourteen. „sukcesorów po Jadwidze” is a unit of its own: Jadwiga is no longer alive (the mark for a deceased person), and her succession holds the hearth; in T90 (card 3), entry H) the same holding stands separately as 1 hearth held by Antoni Borkowski. The figure „14” has been corrected on the card — the four written over an earlier digit [reading uncertain as to what stood underneath]; above the word „Ługowskich” stands a superscript „2” of undetermined meaning. I record the surname in the masculine plural of the card („Ługowskich” → Ługowski), because in a collective entry there is no other form.
ŁugowskiWojciech
T9414 · share of 0.88cz. Jana i Wojciecha, Stanisława, Szymona, Macieja, Mateusza sukcesorów po Jadwidze, Fabjana, Antoniego, Leona, Jana i Fabjana, Wincentego, Marcina, Jakóba, Andrzeja, Ługowskich – po 1 dymie – 14 dymów;card 5)

the same entry also names: Ługowski Jan, Ługowski Stanisław, Ługowski Szymon, Ługowski Maciej, Ługowski Mateusz, Ługowski Jadwiga †, Ługowski Fabjan, Ługowski Antoni, Ługowski Leon, Ługowski Jan, Ługowski Fabjan, Ługowski Wincenty, Ługowski Marcin, Ługowski Jakób, Ługowski Andrzej16 persons on 14 hearths

Sixteen persons on fourteen hearths, and so it should be: the card separates the joint holders with commas, and joins two pairs with the conjunction „i” — „Jana i Wojciecha” and „Jana i Fabjana” — so these pairs sit two to a hearth. The units come to exactly fourteen. „sukcesorów po Jadwidze” is a unit of its own: Jadwiga is no longer alive (the mark for a deceased person), and her succession holds the hearth; in T90 (card 3), entry H) the same holding stands separately as 1 hearth held by Antoni Borkowski. The figure „14” has been corrected on the card — the four written over an earlier digit [reading uncertain as to what stood underneath]; above the word „Ługowskich” stands a superscript „2” of undetermined meaning. I record the surname in the masculine plural of the card („Ługowskich” → Ługowski), because in a collective entry there is no other form.
TarczewskiAndrzej
T941 hearthcz. Andrzeja Tarzewskiego 1 d.;card 5)

The spelling agrees with T90, entry C (card 2): „Tarzewskiego”. Only T89, entry 6 (card 4), departs from it, where I read the same surname as „Tarczmowskiego” [reading uncertain].

Katemberkparish priest of Siedlce (proboszcz siedlecki)
T941 hearthpriest (ksiądz)cz. X. Katemberka 1 d.;card 5)
A cleric („X.” = ksiądz, priest), without a forename; here the card does not repeat the office, but in T90, entry D (card 2), the same man is „proboszczem siedleckim”. The writing of the surname is the same as there — „Katemberka”; the nominative „Katemberk” reconstructed [reading uncertain].
StruśJoachim
T941 hearthcz. Joachima Strusia 1 d.;card 5)

The ending of the surname has been reworked on the card (under „-sia” a correction is visible).

ChromińskiAdam
T942 · each 1cz. Adama, Wawrzyńca Chromińskich - po 1 dymie - 2 d.;card 5)

the same entry also names: Chromiński Wawrzyniec2 persons on 2 hearths

Here „Chromińskich”, in T90 and T89 „Chromieńskich”; `nazwiska.json` recognises both forms as one surname.

ChromińskiWawrzyniec
T942 · each 1cz. Adama, Wawrzyńca Chromińskich - po 1 dymie - 2 d.;card 5)

the same entry also names: Chromiński Adam2 persons on 2 hearths

Here „Chromińskich”, in T90 and T89 „Chromieńskich”; `nazwiska.json` recognises both forms as one surname.

TchórzewskiJózef
T941 hearthcz. Józefa Tchorzewskiego 1 d.;card 5)

O83 O83A description of 1783 [the expansion of the siglum to be confirmed]

Drohojewskiparish priest of Siedlce (proboszcz siedlecki)dean of Łuków (dziekan łukowski), parish priest of Siedlce (proboszcz siedlecki)
O83priest (ksiądz)O83 (IX). – Ługi Wielkie – cząstki szlacheckie, część największa księdza Drochojewskiego, dziekana łukowskiego, proboszcza siedleckiego;card 3)
A short characterisation of the village; without figures of hearths, hence the hearths figure is empty. The Roman numeral in brackets. The cleric named by his office, without a forename. The writing of the surname on this card: „Drochojewskiego” (with „ch”); in T89 on card 4) the same person is written „Drohoiewskiego” (with a bare „h”) — both readings checked under magnification; I do not merge them. The content has been carried over into the village's the description of the village field.

This locality in the full edition of the hearth-tax registers — together with a search across all persons, a modern map, Perthées’s engraving of 1786 and a statistical summary.