Home › Castle court records / Old sources › The hearth-tax registers 1775–1794 › Ostoje
Hearth Tax Registers of the Łuków Land 1775–1794
Ostoje
Parish of Zbuczyn, łukowski county.
Dear reader, remember that this is an AI study, that it may contain errors; treat it as indicative and verify it for yourself.
the forms on the cards: Ostoje, Ostoie, Ostoye
district of łukowski · parish of Zbuczyn · cards 1), 2), 3), 4)
noble holdings [O83 (IX)]
| Year | Source | Entries | Hearths |
|---|---|---|---|
| T75 | Hearth tax register 1775 | 6 | 14 |
| T89 | Hearth tax register 1789 | 4 | 10 |
| T90 | Hearth tax register 1790 | 5 | 11 |
| T94 | Hearth tax register 1794 | 4 | 11 |
Caveats on the years' registers (5)
What the compiler noted beside the entry itself, and what the table above does not show:
- T75 — Below the list: „Razem dymów 14.” (underlined twice). The sum of the entries 1+5+4+1+1+2 = 14 — it agrees. In the heading, between the stroke and the name of the village, stands a WORD STRUCK THROUGH with a horizontal stroke, illegible [reading uncertain]; from the outline of the letters it comes closest to the abbreviation „wś”/„wsi”, which the card index sets before the name in the heading of T94 on card 3) — but I do not vouch for this. THE SURNAME OSTOJSKI IS DOUBLED IN THIS EXTRACT: entry 2 has „Ostoyskich” (without „r”), entry 3 „Ostroyskiego” (with a distinct „r”). I do not smooth over the discrepancy — both forms are recorded as they stand.
- T89 — A continuous extract, without numbering of entries — the numbers 1–4 are editorial, for order's sake. Closed with „= 10 d – zob. Izdebki Wąsy;”. The total of the entries 6+2+1+1 = 10 — it agrees. DIFFERENCES AGAINST T90 ON THE SAME CARD: (1) in T90 the sixth person of the collective entry is „sukces. Józefa”, while T89 has in this place the living „Szymona” — the card index nowhere names both at once; (2) in T90 there are two Izdebskis (Łukasz and Piotr, 2 hearths), in T89 only Piotr remains, with one hearth.
- T₀89 — A LIST OF POSSESSORS OF HOLDINGS, WITHOUT HEARTHS — hence the hearths figure = null in every entry. It begins on card 3) (card 3) in a TWO-COLUMN LAYOUT: entries 1–3 are the left-hand column, 4–6 the right; the continuation stands on card 4) (card 4) under the heading „T₀89 – c.d.” — there two further holdings, in a single column. EIGHT HOLDINGS in all. Throughout the extract the family surname is written with a „y” — „Ostoyskiego”, „Ostoyskiey” — as in T94 on the same card, and differently from „Ostojskich” in T90 and T89 on card 2). Two holdings belong to WOMEN: Zofia and Józefa. THE ANNOTATION „nie wysiewa 10 korcy” stands only on card 4), beside the last two entries (beside the second in the form „podobnież”) — beside the six entries of card 3) the card index adds nothing. This list for Ostoje records neither PROPINATION NOR PLEDGE anywhere (unlike T₀89 of many neighbouring villages).
- T90 — Below the list: „Razem - 11 dymów wiejskich 2giej klasy;” (the figure underlined twice). The sum of entries B+C+D+E = 1+2+2+6 = 11 — it agrees. Entry A has no hearths, because it is a mere cross-reference to Izdebki Wąsy. The extract is written in blue ink. At entries C, D and E the card index does not repeat the formula „dym wiejski 2giej klasy”, but sets repetition marks („ „ „ „ ”) instead — transcribed as they stand.
- T94 — Below the list, under a long horizontal stroke: „Razem 11 dymów.”. The sum of entries 1+6+2+2 = 11 — it agrees. The CROSS-REFERENCE „zob. Izdebki Wąsy;” stands HERE, IN THE VERY HEADING of the transcript, and not as a separate entry (as in T90) nor after the total (as in T89) — a third way of recording the same link; the hearths of Tchórzewski's holding are again booked under Izdebki Wąsy („cz. Stanisława Tchorzewskiego z częścią na wsi Ostojach 3 d.”), not among these eleven. I read the abbreviation before the name of the village as „wś” (= wieś); it is written with three characters, with a full stop and a diacritical stroke, so „wsi”/„wśi” is also possible [reading uncertain]. BETWEEN ENTRY 2 AND ENTRY 3 STANDS A LINE STRUCK OUT IN FULL by one long horizontal stroke, legible beneath it: „cz. Łukasza, Woyciecha Ost.” — the last word broken off/abbreviated [reading uncertain]. I do not enter it into the entries of the extract (the card index has removed it, and the total of 11 does not include it), but I note it, because this is the only place in this village where Łukasz stands beside Wojciech. In this transcript the family surname is written with „y”: „Ostoyskich”, „Ostoyskiego” — unlike „Ostojskich” in T90 and T89 on card 2).
The card-index entries
Every extract for this locality in the wording of the cards, year by year. One block is one occurrence: this person, in this year. At a collective item the same card text stands beside every person named — because the card names them together and they must not be separated. The hearths given at a collective item are an equal division among those named, not a reading.
1775 T75Hearth tax register 1775
the same entry also names: Ostoyski Józef, Ostoyski Wawrzyniec, Ostoyski Wawrzyniec, Ostoyski Marcin5 persons on 5 hearths
The second forename in the enumeration is STRUCK THROUGH with a horizontal stroke and, under the striking-out, illegible [reading uncertain]; from the outlines of the letters (a tall loop, a descender below the line, humps, a final „a”) it comes closest to the form „Szymona” — and a Szymon Ostojski does indeed stand in T89 on card 2) — but I do not vouch for the reading and do not enter this person into the list of persons. The reckoning confirms that the struck-out one does not count: Józef + 2 Wawrzyńców + Marcin + Jakób = five persons „po 1 dymie” = 5 hearths. „2 Wawrzyńców” (two of the name Wawrzyniec) are two namesakes — entered as two persons. The card index here writes „Ostoyskich”, and in entry 3 „Ostroyskiego”.
the same entry also names: Ostoyski Wawrzyniec, Ostoyski Wawrzyniec, Ostoyski Marcin, Ostoyski Jakób5 persons on 5 hearths
The second forename in the enumeration is STRUCK THROUGH with a horizontal stroke and, under the striking-out, illegible [reading uncertain]; from the outlines of the letters (a tall loop, a descender below the line, humps, a final „a”) it comes closest to the form „Szymona” — and a Szymon Ostojski does indeed stand in T89 on card 2) — but I do not vouch for the reading and do not enter this person into the list of persons. The reckoning confirms that the struck-out one does not count: Józef + 2 Wawrzyńców + Marcin + Jakób = five persons „po 1 dymie” = 5 hearths. „2 Wawrzyńców” (two of the name Wawrzyniec) are two namesakes — entered as two persons. The card index here writes „Ostoyskich”, and in entry 3 „Ostroyskiego”.
the same entry also names: Ostoyski Józef, Ostoyski Wawrzyniec, Ostoyski Wawrzyniec, Ostoyski Jakób5 persons on 5 hearths
The second forename in the enumeration is STRUCK THROUGH with a horizontal stroke and, under the striking-out, illegible [reading uncertain]; from the outlines of the letters (a tall loop, a descender below the line, humps, a final „a”) it comes closest to the form „Szymona” — and a Szymon Ostojski does indeed stand in T89 on card 2) — but I do not vouch for the reading and do not enter this person into the list of persons. The reckoning confirms that the struck-out one does not count: Józef + 2 Wawrzyńców + Marcin + Jakób = five persons „po 1 dymie” = 5 hearths. „2 Wawrzyńców” (two of the name Wawrzyniec) are two namesakes — entered as two persons. The card index here writes „Ostoyskich”, and in entry 3 „Ostroyskiego”.
the same entry also names: Ostoyski Józef, Ostoyski Wawrzyniec, Ostoyski Marcin, Ostoyski Jakób5 persons on 5 hearths
The second forename in the enumeration is STRUCK THROUGH with a horizontal stroke and, under the striking-out, illegible [reading uncertain]; from the outlines of the letters (a tall loop, a descender below the line, humps, a final „a”) it comes closest to the form „Szymona” — and a Szymon Ostojski does indeed stand in T89 on card 2) — but I do not vouch for the reading and do not enter this person into the list of persons. The reckoning confirms that the struck-out one does not count: Józef + 2 Wawrzyńców + Marcin + Jakób = five persons „po 1 dymie” = 5 hearths. „2 Wawrzyńców” (two of the name Wawrzyniec) are two namesakes — entered as two persons. The card index here writes „Ostoyskich”, and in entry 3 „Ostroyskiego”.
the same entry also names: Ostoyski Józef, Ostoyski Wawrzyniec, Ostoyski Marcin, Ostoyski Jakób5 persons on 5 hearths
The second forename in the enumeration is STRUCK THROUGH with a horizontal stroke and, under the striking-out, illegible [reading uncertain]; from the outlines of the letters (a tall loop, a descender below the line, humps, a final „a”) it comes closest to the form „Szymona” — and a Szymon Ostojski does indeed stand in T89 on card 2) — but I do not vouch for the reading and do not enter this person into the list of persons. The reckoning confirms that the struck-out one does not count: Józef + 2 Wawrzyńców + Marcin + Jakób = five persons „po 1 dymie” = 5 hearths. „2 Wawrzyńców” (two of the name Wawrzyniec) are two namesakes — entered as two persons. The card index here writes „Ostoyskich”, and in entry 3 „Ostroyskiego”.
A TWO-LINE ENTRY: the second line („i w 3 części – 2 dymy”) is indented to the right, has no number of its own and belongs to the same entry — 4 hearths in all, which the card's own total confirms (without this line it would come to 12, and the card gives 14). One man therefore holds three separate holdings: two of one hearth each and a third of two hearths. In the word after „po” a strikethrough or a mark of abbreviation is visible; I read „po jedn.” [reading uncertain]. The surname with a clear „r” after „t”: „Ostroyskiego” — unlike „Ostoyskich” in entry 2 of the same list.
On the card „Woyciecha Domanskiego” — without a stroke over the „n”. Domański occurs at Ostoje only once, in the register of 1775; he is in no later extract for this village.
The only entry in the whole village in which the surname stands BEFORE the forename. I read the surname as „Thorzewskiego” — after the looped „T” comes at once a tall „h”, the letter „c” between them is not visible [reading uncertain as to the „c”: „Tchorzewskiego” is possible]; the form „Thorzewski” is attested in this area (Krasusze Miktusy, Krasusze Zaolszynie, Maciejowice, Okniny). This is the same family as Stanisław Tchórzewski of Izdebki Wąsy, whom three extracts there (T90 entry G, T89 entry 3, T94) tie to „częścią na wsi Ostojach” (a holding in the village of Ostoje). At Ostoje he stands ONLY here — from T90 his hearths are entered under Izdebki Wąsy, and Ostoje at this point carries only a cross-reference.
1789 T89Hearth tax register 1789
the same entry also names: Ostojski Jakub, Ostojski Wojciech, Ostojski Wawrzyniec, Ostojski Jan, Ostojski Szymon6 persons on 6 hearths
A WOMAN: Zofia — here without the note „wdowy”, which stands beside her in T90 on the same card. The surname stands once, in the masculine plural („Ostojskich”); for her it is recorded in the feminine form, since the forename decides the gender. The card index writes here „Wawrzeńca” (not „Wawrzyńca”, as in T90) and „Jakuba” (not „Jakóba”) — recorded as on the card.
the same entry also names: Ostojska Zofia, Ostojski Wojciech, Ostojski Wawrzyniec, Ostojski Jan, Ostojski Szymon6 persons on 6 hearths
A WOMAN: Zofia — here without the note „wdowy”, which stands beside her in T90 on the same card. The surname stands once, in the masculine plural („Ostojskich”); for her it is recorded in the feminine form, since the forename decides the gender. The card index writes here „Wawrzeńca” (not „Wawrzyńca”, as in T90) and „Jakuba” (not „Jakóba”) — recorded as on the card.
the same entry also names: Ostojska Zofia, Ostojski Jakub, Ostojski Wojciech, Ostojski Wawrzyniec, Ostojski Szymon6 persons on 6 hearths
A WOMAN: Zofia — here without the note „wdowy”, which stands beside her in T90 on the same card. The surname stands once, in the masculine plural („Ostojskich”); for her it is recorded in the feminine form, since the forename decides the gender. The card index writes here „Wawrzeńca” (not „Wawrzyńca”, as in T90) and „Jakuba” (not „Jakóba”) — recorded as on the card.
the same entry also names: Ostojska Zofia, Ostojski Jakub, Ostojski Wojciech, Ostojski Wawrzyniec, Ostojski Jan6 persons on 6 hearths
A WOMAN: Zofia — here without the note „wdowy”, which stands beside her in T90 on the same card. The surname stands once, in the masculine plural („Ostojskich”); for her it is recorded in the feminine form, since the forename decides the gender. The card index writes here „Wawrzeńca” (not „Wawrzyńca”, as in T90) and „Jakuba” (not „Jakóba”) — recorded as on the card.
the same entry also names: Ostojska Zofia, Ostojski Jakub, Ostojski Wojciech, Ostojski Jan, Ostojski Szymon6 persons on 6 hearths
A WOMAN: Zofia — here without the note „wdowy”, which stands beside her in T90 on the same card. The surname stands once, in the masculine plural („Ostojskich”); for her it is recorded in the feminine form, since the forename decides the gender. The card index writes here „Wawrzeńca” (not „Wawrzyńca”, as in T90) and „Jakuba” (not „Jakóba”) — recorded as on the card.
the same entry also names: Ostojska Zofia, Ostojski Jakub, Ostojski Wawrzyniec, Ostojski Jan, Ostojski Szymon6 persons on 6 hearths
A WOMAN: Zofia — here without the note „wdowy”, which stands beside her in T90 on the same card. The surname stands once, in the masculine plural („Ostojskich”); for her it is recorded in the feminine form, since the forename decides the gender. The card index writes here „Wawrzeńca” (not „Wawrzyńca”, as in T90) and „Jakuba” (not „Jakóba”) — recorded as on the card.
A CROSS-REFERENCE TO ANOTHER VILLAGE: „zob. Izdebki Wąsy;” stands AFTER the total „= 10 d”, that is, outside the arithmetic — just as entry A does in T90 on the same card. The hearths of Tchórzewski's holding are booked under Izdebki Wąsy (T89 there: „cz. Tchórzewskiego Stan. z częścią na wsi Ostojach złączoną 1 dwór, 1 brow., 1 karcz., 1 chat. bez ogr. = 4 d.”), not under Ostoje. The surname here has an accent: „Królikowskiego”.
1789 T₀89List of possessors of holdings of 1789
A WOMAN — the surname in the feminine form, just as it stands on the card („Ostoyskiey”). The same Zofia who in T90 on card 2) is called a widow.
On the card „Wawrzeńca” — the same as in T89 on card 2), and differently than „Wawrzyńca” in T90 and T94.
A WOMAN — both the forename and the surname in the feminine form: „Józefy … Ostoyskiey”. This is NOT the Józef Ostojski of T90 and T94, beside whom stands the masculine „sukces. Józefa”; that one is already dead by 1789/1790, while here the possessor spoken of is a woman. I do not smooth away the distinction.
The first line of the continuation on card 4) („T₀89 – c.d.”). The addition „nie wysiewa 10 korcy” — evidence that the possessor did not have the property census — read at an enlargement, without doubt.
„podobnież” (likewise) stands exactly beneath the addition „nie wysiewa 10 korcy” from the line above and refers back to it — hence the same annotation. Piotr Ostoyski occurs in the whole village ONLY here; he is in no register (the Piotr the registers record is Piotr Izdebski).
1790 T90Hearth tax register 1790
the same entry also names: Izdebski Piotr2 persons on 2 hearths
the same entry also names: Izdebski Łukasz2 persons on 2 hearths
the same entry also names: Ostojski Jan, Ostojski Wawrzyniec, Ostojski Wojciech, Ostojski Zofia, Ostojski Józef †6 persons on 6 hearths
A WOMAN: „Zofji wdowy” — a forename of her own is given (Zofia), so this is not a husband-derived form, and I do not open the field the recorded form of the name; she herself is a widow, this makes no one else named here deceased. The surname stands once, in the masculine plural („Ostojskich”), and is recorded beside her in that form. The third forename in the list, „Karola”, is STRUCK OUT with two strokes and legible beneath the striking-out — this is the same Karol whom the card index has recorded separately in entry D with two hearths; I do not enter him here into the list of persons, because the transcript has removed him from this entry. Arithmetic: six unstruck persons at 1 hearth each = 6 hearths. „sukces. Józefa” — Józef is deceased.
the same entry also names: Ostojski Jakób, Ostojski Wawrzyniec, Ostojski Wojciech, Ostojski Zofia, Ostojski Józef †6 persons on 6 hearths
A WOMAN: „Zofji wdowy” — a forename of her own is given (Zofia), so this is not a husband-derived form, and I do not open the field the recorded form of the name; she herself is a widow, this makes no one else named here deceased. The surname stands once, in the masculine plural („Ostojskich”), and is recorded beside her in that form. The third forename in the list, „Karola”, is STRUCK OUT with two strokes and legible beneath the striking-out — this is the same Karol whom the card index has recorded separately in entry D with two hearths; I do not enter him here into the list of persons, because the transcript has removed him from this entry. Arithmetic: six unstruck persons at 1 hearth each = 6 hearths. „sukces. Józefa” — Józef is deceased.
the same entry also names: Ostojski Jakób, Ostojski Jan, Ostojski Wawrzyniec, Ostojski Wojciech, Ostojski Zofia6 persons on 6 hearths
A WOMAN: „Zofji wdowy” — a forename of her own is given (Zofia), so this is not a husband-derived form, and I do not open the field the recorded form of the name; she herself is a widow, this makes no one else named here deceased. The surname stands once, in the masculine plural („Ostojskich”), and is recorded beside her in that form. The third forename in the list, „Karola”, is STRUCK OUT with two strokes and legible beneath the striking-out — this is the same Karol whom the card index has recorded separately in entry D with two hearths; I do not enter him here into the list of persons, because the transcript has removed him from this entry. Arithmetic: six unstruck persons at 1 hearth each = 6 hearths. „sukces. Józefa” — Józef is deceased.
the same entry also names: Ostojski Jakób, Ostojski Jan, Ostojski Wojciech, Ostojski Zofia, Ostojski Józef †6 persons on 6 hearths
A WOMAN: „Zofji wdowy” — a forename of her own is given (Zofia), so this is not a husband-derived form, and I do not open the field the recorded form of the name; she herself is a widow, this makes no one else named here deceased. The surname stands once, in the masculine plural („Ostojskich”), and is recorded beside her in that form. The third forename in the list, „Karola”, is STRUCK OUT with two strokes and legible beneath the striking-out — this is the same Karol whom the card index has recorded separately in entry D with two hearths; I do not enter him here into the list of persons, because the transcript has removed him from this entry. Arithmetic: six unstruck persons at 1 hearth each = 6 hearths. „sukces. Józefa” — Józef is deceased.
the same entry also names: Ostojski Jakób, Ostojski Jan, Ostojski Wawrzyniec, Ostojski Zofia, Ostojski Józef †6 persons on 6 hearths
A WOMAN: „Zofji wdowy” — a forename of her own is given (Zofia), so this is not a husband-derived form, and I do not open the field the recorded form of the name; she herself is a widow, this makes no one else named here deceased. The surname stands once, in the masculine plural („Ostojskich”), and is recorded beside her in that form. The third forename in the list, „Karola”, is STRUCK OUT with two strokes and legible beneath the striking-out — this is the same Karol whom the card index has recorded separately in entry D with two hearths; I do not enter him here into the list of persons, because the transcript has removed him from this entry. Arithmetic: six unstruck persons at 1 hearth each = 6 hearths. „sukces. Józefa” — Józef is deceased.
the same entry also names: Ostojski Jakób, Ostojski Jan, Ostojski Wawrzyniec, Ostojski Wojciech, Ostojski Józef †6 persons on 6 hearths
A WOMAN: „Zofji wdowy” — a forename of her own is given (Zofia), so this is not a husband-derived form, and I do not open the field the recorded form of the name; she herself is a widow, this makes no one else named here deceased. The surname stands once, in the masculine plural („Ostojskich”), and is recorded beside her in that form. The third forename in the list, „Karola”, is STRUCK OUT with two strokes and legible beneath the striking-out — this is the same Karol whom the card index has recorded separately in entry D with two hearths; I do not enter him here into the list of persons, because the transcript has removed him from this entry. Arithmetic: six unstruck persons at 1 hearth each = 6 hearths. „sukces. Józefa” — Józef is deceased.
1794 T94Hearth tax register 1794
the same entry also names: Ostoyski Józef †, Ostoyski Wawrzyniec, Ostoyski Jan, Ostoyski Jakób, Ostoyski Wojciech6 persons on 6 hearths
A WOMAN: Zofia — the surname stands once, in the masculine plural („Ostoyskich”), recorded beside her in the feminine form, since the forename settles the gender. THE REACH OF THE WORD „sukcesorów” IS AMBIGUOUS: it stands once, before the whole enumeration of six forenames in the genitive, so grammatically it could take in all of them. I refer it to Józef alone, since T90 settles this on card 2) („…Zofji wdowy i sukces. Józefa – Ostojskich”), where „sukces.” stands beside Józef alone, and the remaining five are listed as living; the same five are also alive in T89. I leave the decision, however, for the owner to confirm. Six persons, six hearths „po 1 dymie” — the count closes.
the same entry also names: Ostoyski Józef †, Ostoyski Wawrzyniec, Ostoyski Jan, Ostoyska Zofia, Ostoyski Wojciech6 persons on 6 hearths
A WOMAN: Zofia — the surname stands once, in the masculine plural („Ostoyskich”), recorded beside her in the feminine form, since the forename settles the gender. THE REACH OF THE WORD „sukcesorów” IS AMBIGUOUS: it stands once, before the whole enumeration of six forenames in the genitive, so grammatically it could take in all of them. I refer it to Józef alone, since T90 settles this on card 2) („…Zofji wdowy i sukces. Józefa – Ostojskich”), where „sukces.” stands beside Józef alone, and the remaining five are listed as living; the same five are also alive in T89. I leave the decision, however, for the owner to confirm. Six persons, six hearths „po 1 dymie” — the count closes.
the same entry also names: Ostoyski Józef †, Ostoyski Wawrzyniec, Ostoyska Zofia, Ostoyski Jakób, Ostoyski Wojciech6 persons on 6 hearths
A WOMAN: Zofia — the surname stands once, in the masculine plural („Ostoyskich”), recorded beside her in the feminine form, since the forename settles the gender. THE REACH OF THE WORD „sukcesorów” IS AMBIGUOUS: it stands once, before the whole enumeration of six forenames in the genitive, so grammatically it could take in all of them. I refer it to Józef alone, since T90 settles this on card 2) („…Zofji wdowy i sukces. Józefa – Ostojskich”), where „sukces.” stands beside Józef alone, and the remaining five are listed as living; the same five are also alive in T89. I leave the decision, however, for the owner to confirm. Six persons, six hearths „po 1 dymie” — the count closes.
the same entry also names: Ostoyski Wawrzyniec, Ostoyski Jan, Ostoyska Zofia, Ostoyski Jakób, Ostoyski Wojciech6 persons on 6 hearths
A WOMAN: Zofia — the surname stands once, in the masculine plural („Ostoyskich”), recorded beside her in the feminine form, since the forename settles the gender. THE REACH OF THE WORD „sukcesorów” IS AMBIGUOUS: it stands once, before the whole enumeration of six forenames in the genitive, so grammatically it could take in all of them. I refer it to Józef alone, since T90 settles this on card 2) („…Zofji wdowy i sukces. Józefa – Ostojskich”), where „sukces.” stands beside Józef alone, and the remaining five are listed as living; the same five are also alive in T89. I leave the decision, however, for the owner to confirm. Six persons, six hearths „po 1 dymie” — the count closes.
the same entry also names: Ostoyski Józef †, Ostoyski Jan, Ostoyska Zofia, Ostoyski Jakób, Ostoyski Wojciech6 persons on 6 hearths
A WOMAN: Zofia — the surname stands once, in the masculine plural („Ostoyskich”), recorded beside her in the feminine form, since the forename settles the gender. THE REACH OF THE WORD „sukcesorów” IS AMBIGUOUS: it stands once, before the whole enumeration of six forenames in the genitive, so grammatically it could take in all of them. I refer it to Józef alone, since T90 settles this on card 2) („…Zofji wdowy i sukces. Józefa – Ostojskich”), where „sukces.” stands beside Józef alone, and the remaining five are listed as living; the same five are also alive in T89. I leave the decision, however, for the owner to confirm. Six persons, six hearths „po 1 dymie” — the count closes.
the same entry also names: Ostoyski Józef †, Ostoyski Wawrzyniec, Ostoyski Jan, Ostoyska Zofia, Ostoyski Jakób6 persons on 6 hearths
A WOMAN: Zofia — the surname stands once, in the masculine plural („Ostoyskich”), recorded beside her in the feminine form, since the forename settles the gender. THE REACH OF THE WORD „sukcesorów” IS AMBIGUOUS: it stands once, before the whole enumeration of six forenames in the genitive, so grammatically it could take in all of them. I refer it to Józef alone, since T90 settles this on card 2) („…Zofji wdowy i sukces. Józefa – Ostojskich”), where „sukces.” stands beside Józef alone, and the remaining five are listed as living; the same five are also alive in T89. I leave the decision, however, for the owner to confirm. Six persons, six hearths „po 1 dymie” — the count closes.
the same entry also names: Izdebski Piotr2 persons on 2 hearths
Łukasz Izdebski, who is absent from T89 (1789), returns here beside Piotr — just as in T90 (1790).
the same entry also names: Izdebski Łukasz2 persons on 2 hearths
Łukasz Izdebski, who is absent from T89 (1789), returns here beside Piotr — just as in T90 (1790).
This locality in the full edition of the hearth-tax registers — together with a search across all persons, a modern map, Perthées’s engraving of 1786 and a statistical summary.
