The card-index entries
Every extract for this locality in the wording of the cards, year by year. One block is one occurrence: this person, in this year. At a collective item the same card text stands beside every person named — because the card names them together and they must not be separated. The hearths given at a collective item are an equal division among those named, not a reading.
1775 T75Hearth tax register 1775
BorkowskiJan
T756 · each 1w częściach Macieja, Mateusza, Pawła, Jana, Tomasza, Piotra Borkowskich po 1 dymie – 6 dym[ów]card 1)
the same entry also names: Borkowski Maciej, Borkowski Mateusz, Borkowski Paweł, Borkowski Tomasz, Borkowski Piotr6 persons on 6 hearths
Six forenames, six hearths — it agrees with „po 1 dymie”. The surname „Borkowskich” is underlined; the figure „6 dym…” stands at the right-hand edge of the card, the end of the word cut off at the edge, but the digit 6 and the underline are legible.
BorkowskiMaciej
T756 · each 1w częściach Macieja, Mateusza, Pawła, Jana, Tomasza, Piotra Borkowskich po 1 dymie – 6 dym[ów]card 1)
the same entry also names: Borkowski Mateusz, Borkowski Paweł, Borkowski Jan, Borkowski Tomasz, Borkowski Piotr6 persons on 6 hearths
Six forenames, six hearths — it agrees with „po 1 dymie”. The surname „Borkowskich” is underlined; the figure „6 dym…” stands at the right-hand edge of the card, the end of the word cut off at the edge, but the digit 6 and the underline are legible.
BorkowskiMateusz
T756 · each 1w częściach Macieja, Mateusza, Pawła, Jana, Tomasza, Piotra Borkowskich po 1 dymie – 6 dym[ów]card 1)
the same entry also names: Borkowski Maciej, Borkowski Paweł, Borkowski Jan, Borkowski Tomasz, Borkowski Piotr6 persons on 6 hearths
Six forenames, six hearths — it agrees with „po 1 dymie”. The surname „Borkowskich” is underlined; the figure „6 dym…” stands at the right-hand edge of the card, the end of the word cut off at the edge, but the digit 6 and the underline are legible.
BorkowskiPaweł
T756 · each 1w częściach Macieja, Mateusza, Pawła, Jana, Tomasza, Piotra Borkowskich po 1 dymie – 6 dym[ów]card 1)
the same entry also names: Borkowski Maciej, Borkowski Mateusz, Borkowski Jan, Borkowski Tomasz, Borkowski Piotr6 persons on 6 hearths
Six forenames, six hearths — it agrees with „po 1 dymie”. The surname „Borkowskich” is underlined; the figure „6 dym…” stands at the right-hand edge of the card, the end of the word cut off at the edge, but the digit 6 and the underline are legible.
BorkowskiPiotr
T756 · each 1w częściach Macieja, Mateusza, Pawła, Jana, Tomasza, Piotra Borkowskich po 1 dymie – 6 dym[ów]card 1)
the same entry also names: Borkowski Maciej, Borkowski Mateusz, Borkowski Paweł, Borkowski Jan, Borkowski Tomasz6 persons on 6 hearths
Six forenames, six hearths — it agrees with „po 1 dymie”. The surname „Borkowskich” is underlined; the figure „6 dym…” stands at the right-hand edge of the card, the end of the word cut off at the edge, but the digit 6 and the underline are legible.
BorkowskiTomasz
T756 · each 1w częściach Macieja, Mateusza, Pawła, Jana, Tomasza, Piotra Borkowskich po 1 dymie – 6 dym[ów]card 1)
the same entry also names: Borkowski Maciej, Borkowski Mateusz, Borkowski Paweł, Borkowski Jan, Borkowski Piotr6 persons on 6 hearths
Six forenames, six hearths — it agrees with „po 1 dymie”. The surname „Borkowskich” is underlined; the figure „6 dym…” stands at the right-hand edge of the card, the end of the word cut off at the edge, but the digit 6 and the underline are legible.
Jasiński
T752 hearthsczęść Jasińskiego – 2 dymycard 1)
The card gives no forename — the surname alone in the genitive, so the field the recorded form of the name is left empty (this is not a husband-derived form). The writing on the card: „Jasińskiego” (not „Jasieńskiego”) — after „Jas” comes an „i” with a dot, then „ń” with an oblique stroke. The figure „2” underlined. Cf. card 5 (T₀89), where the holding at Borki is held by Xawery Jasieński, swordbearer.
JastrzębskiAdam
T7514 · each 1w częściach Michała, Benedykta, Ignacego, Marcina, Krzysztofa, Jakóba, Ignacego, Macieja, Wojciecha, Fabjana, Macieja, Marcina, Adama, Jana, Jastrzębskich po 1 dymie – dymów 14 dymówcard 1)
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Michał, Jastrzębski Benedykt, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Krzysztof, Jastrzębski Jakób, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Maciej, Jastrzębski Wojciech, Jastrzębski Fabjan, Jastrzębski Maciej, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Jan14 persons on 14 hearths
Fourteen forenames, fourteen hearths — it agrees with „po 1 dymie”. Repeated forenames: Ignacy twice, Maciej twice, Marcin twice — this is no slip of reading; each stands in a different place in the list and each carries a hearth of its own (14 persons = 14 hearths). The surname „Jastrzębskich” is added at the end of the third line, by the right-hand edge, in smaller writing and with a turn downwards (there was not room enough). In the line with the total the author wrote the word „dymów” twice — before the figure and after it („dymów 14 dymów”); the figure 14 underlined. I transcribe it literally.
JastrzębskiBenedykt
T7514 · each 1w częściach Michała, Benedykta, Ignacego, Marcina, Krzysztofa, Jakóba, Ignacego, Macieja, Wojciecha, Fabjana, Macieja, Marcina, Adama, Jana, Jastrzębskich po 1 dymie – dymów 14 dymówcard 1)
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Michał, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Krzysztof, Jastrzębski Jakób, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Maciej, Jastrzębski Wojciech, Jastrzębski Fabjan, Jastrzębski Maciej, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Adam, Jastrzębski Jan14 persons on 14 hearths
Fourteen forenames, fourteen hearths — it agrees with „po 1 dymie”. Repeated forenames: Ignacy twice, Maciej twice, Marcin twice — this is no slip of reading; each stands in a different place in the list and each carries a hearth of its own (14 persons = 14 hearths). The surname „Jastrzębskich” is added at the end of the third line, by the right-hand edge, in smaller writing and with a turn downwards (there was not room enough). In the line with the total the author wrote the word „dymów” twice — before the figure and after it („dymów 14 dymów”); the figure 14 underlined. I transcribe it literally.
JastrzębskiFabjan
T7514 · each 1w częściach Michała, Benedykta, Ignacego, Marcina, Krzysztofa, Jakóba, Ignacego, Macieja, Wojciecha, Fabjana, Macieja, Marcina, Adama, Jana, Jastrzębskich po 1 dymie – dymów 14 dymówcard 1)
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Michał, Jastrzębski Benedykt, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Krzysztof, Jastrzębski Jakób, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Maciej, Jastrzębski Wojciech, Jastrzębski Maciej, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Adam, Jastrzębski Jan14 persons on 14 hearths
Fourteen forenames, fourteen hearths — it agrees with „po 1 dymie”. Repeated forenames: Ignacy twice, Maciej twice, Marcin twice — this is no slip of reading; each stands in a different place in the list and each carries a hearth of its own (14 persons = 14 hearths). The surname „Jastrzębskich” is added at the end of the third line, by the right-hand edge, in smaller writing and with a turn downwards (there was not room enough). In the line with the total the author wrote the word „dymów” twice — before the figure and after it („dymów 14 dymów”); the figure 14 underlined. I transcribe it literally.
JastrzębskiIgnacy
T7514 · each 1w częściach Michała, Benedykta, Ignacego, Marcina, Krzysztofa, Jakóba, Ignacego, Macieja, Wojciecha, Fabjana, Macieja, Marcina, Adama, Jana, Jastrzębskich po 1 dymie – dymów 14 dymówcard 1)
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Michał, Jastrzębski Benedykt, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Krzysztof, Jastrzębski Jakób, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Maciej, Jastrzębski Wojciech, Jastrzębski Fabjan, Jastrzębski Maciej, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Adam, Jastrzębski Jan14 persons on 14 hearths
Fourteen forenames, fourteen hearths — it agrees with „po 1 dymie”. Repeated forenames: Ignacy twice, Maciej twice, Marcin twice — this is no slip of reading; each stands in a different place in the list and each carries a hearth of its own (14 persons = 14 hearths). The surname „Jastrzębskich” is added at the end of the third line, by the right-hand edge, in smaller writing and with a turn downwards (there was not room enough). In the line with the total the author wrote the word „dymów” twice — before the figure and after it („dymów 14 dymów”); the figure 14 underlined. I transcribe it literally.
JastrzębskiIgnacy
T7514 · each 1w częściach Michała, Benedykta, Ignacego, Marcina, Krzysztofa, Jakóba, Ignacego, Macieja, Wojciecha, Fabjana, Macieja, Marcina, Adama, Jana, Jastrzębskich po 1 dymie – dymów 14 dymówcard 1)
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Michał, Jastrzębski Benedykt, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Krzysztof, Jastrzębski Jakób, Jastrzębski Maciej, Jastrzębski Wojciech, Jastrzębski Fabjan, Jastrzębski Maciej, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Adam, Jastrzębski Jan14 persons on 14 hearths
Fourteen forenames, fourteen hearths — it agrees with „po 1 dymie”. Repeated forenames: Ignacy twice, Maciej twice, Marcin twice — this is no slip of reading; each stands in a different place in the list and each carries a hearth of its own (14 persons = 14 hearths). The surname „Jastrzębskich” is added at the end of the third line, by the right-hand edge, in smaller writing and with a turn downwards (there was not room enough). In the line with the total the author wrote the word „dymów” twice — before the figure and after it („dymów 14 dymów”); the figure 14 underlined. I transcribe it literally.
JastrzębskiJakub
T7514 · each 1w częściach Michała, Benedykta, Ignacego, Marcina, Krzysztofa, Jakóba, Ignacego, Macieja, Wojciecha, Fabjana, Macieja, Marcina, Adama, Jana, Jastrzębskich po 1 dymie – dymów 14 dymówcard 1)
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Michał, Jastrzębski Benedykt, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Krzysztof, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Maciej, Jastrzębski Wojciech, Jastrzębski Fabjan, Jastrzębski Maciej, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Adam, Jastrzębski Jan14 persons on 14 hearths
Fourteen forenames, fourteen hearths — it agrees with „po 1 dymie”. Repeated forenames: Ignacy twice, Maciej twice, Marcin twice — this is no slip of reading; each stands in a different place in the list and each carries a hearth of its own (14 persons = 14 hearths). The surname „Jastrzębskich” is added at the end of the third line, by the right-hand edge, in smaller writing and with a turn downwards (there was not room enough). In the line with the total the author wrote the word „dymów” twice — before the figure and after it („dymów 14 dymów”); the figure 14 underlined. I transcribe it literally.
JastrzębskiJan
T7514 · each 1w częściach Michała, Benedykta, Ignacego, Marcina, Krzysztofa, Jakóba, Ignacego, Macieja, Wojciecha, Fabjana, Macieja, Marcina, Adama, Jana, Jastrzębskich po 1 dymie – dymów 14 dymówcard 1)
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Michał, Jastrzębski Benedykt, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Krzysztof, Jastrzębski Jakób, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Maciej, Jastrzębski Wojciech, Jastrzębski Fabjan, Jastrzębski Maciej, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Adam14 persons on 14 hearths
Fourteen forenames, fourteen hearths — it agrees with „po 1 dymie”. Repeated forenames: Ignacy twice, Maciej twice, Marcin twice — this is no slip of reading; each stands in a different place in the list and each carries a hearth of its own (14 persons = 14 hearths). The surname „Jastrzębskich” is added at the end of the third line, by the right-hand edge, in smaller writing and with a turn downwards (there was not room enough). In the line with the total the author wrote the word „dymów” twice — before the figure and after it („dymów 14 dymów”); the figure 14 underlined. I transcribe it literally.
JastrzębskiKrzysztof
T7514 · each 1w częściach Michała, Benedykta, Ignacego, Marcina, Krzysztofa, Jakóba, Ignacego, Macieja, Wojciecha, Fabjana, Macieja, Marcina, Adama, Jana, Jastrzębskich po 1 dymie – dymów 14 dymówcard 1)
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Michał, Jastrzębski Benedykt, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Jakób, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Maciej, Jastrzębski Wojciech, Jastrzębski Fabjan, Jastrzębski Maciej, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Adam, Jastrzębski Jan14 persons on 14 hearths
Fourteen forenames, fourteen hearths — it agrees with „po 1 dymie”. Repeated forenames: Ignacy twice, Maciej twice, Marcin twice — this is no slip of reading; each stands in a different place in the list and each carries a hearth of its own (14 persons = 14 hearths). The surname „Jastrzębskich” is added at the end of the third line, by the right-hand edge, in smaller writing and with a turn downwards (there was not room enough). In the line with the total the author wrote the word „dymów” twice — before the figure and after it („dymów 14 dymów”); the figure 14 underlined. I transcribe it literally.
JastrzębskiMaciej
T7514 · each 1w częściach Michała, Benedykta, Ignacego, Marcina, Krzysztofa, Jakóba, Ignacego, Macieja, Wojciecha, Fabjana, Macieja, Marcina, Adama, Jana, Jastrzębskich po 1 dymie – dymów 14 dymówcard 1)
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Michał, Jastrzębski Benedykt, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Krzysztof, Jastrzębski Jakób, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Wojciech, Jastrzębski Fabjan, Jastrzębski Maciej, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Adam, Jastrzębski Jan14 persons on 14 hearths
Fourteen forenames, fourteen hearths — it agrees with „po 1 dymie”. Repeated forenames: Ignacy twice, Maciej twice, Marcin twice — this is no slip of reading; each stands in a different place in the list and each carries a hearth of its own (14 persons = 14 hearths). The surname „Jastrzębskich” is added at the end of the third line, by the right-hand edge, in smaller writing and with a turn downwards (there was not room enough). In the line with the total the author wrote the word „dymów” twice — before the figure and after it („dymów 14 dymów”); the figure 14 underlined. I transcribe it literally.
JastrzębskiMaciej
T7514 · each 1w częściach Michała, Benedykta, Ignacego, Marcina, Krzysztofa, Jakóba, Ignacego, Macieja, Wojciecha, Fabjana, Macieja, Marcina, Adama, Jana, Jastrzębskich po 1 dymie – dymów 14 dymówcard 1)
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Michał, Jastrzębski Benedykt, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Krzysztof, Jastrzębski Jakób, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Maciej, Jastrzębski Wojciech, Jastrzębski Fabjan, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Adam, Jastrzębski Jan14 persons on 14 hearths
Fourteen forenames, fourteen hearths — it agrees with „po 1 dymie”. Repeated forenames: Ignacy twice, Maciej twice, Marcin twice — this is no slip of reading; each stands in a different place in the list and each carries a hearth of its own (14 persons = 14 hearths). The surname „Jastrzębskich” is added at the end of the third line, by the right-hand edge, in smaller writing and with a turn downwards (there was not room enough). In the line with the total the author wrote the word „dymów” twice — before the figure and after it („dymów 14 dymów”); the figure 14 underlined. I transcribe it literally.
JastrzębskiMarcin
T7514 · each 1w częściach Michała, Benedykta, Ignacego, Marcina, Krzysztofa, Jakóba, Ignacego, Macieja, Wojciecha, Fabjana, Macieja, Marcina, Adama, Jana, Jastrzębskich po 1 dymie – dymów 14 dymówcard 1)
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Michał, Jastrzębski Benedykt, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Krzysztof, Jastrzębski Jakób, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Maciej, Jastrzębski Wojciech, Jastrzębski Fabjan, Jastrzębski Maciej, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Adam, Jastrzębski Jan14 persons on 14 hearths
Fourteen forenames, fourteen hearths — it agrees with „po 1 dymie”. Repeated forenames: Ignacy twice, Maciej twice, Marcin twice — this is no slip of reading; each stands in a different place in the list and each carries a hearth of its own (14 persons = 14 hearths). The surname „Jastrzębskich” is added at the end of the third line, by the right-hand edge, in smaller writing and with a turn downwards (there was not room enough). In the line with the total the author wrote the word „dymów” twice — before the figure and after it („dymów 14 dymów”); the figure 14 underlined. I transcribe it literally.
JastrzębskiMarcin
T7514 · each 1w częściach Michała, Benedykta, Ignacego, Marcina, Krzysztofa, Jakóba, Ignacego, Macieja, Wojciecha, Fabjana, Macieja, Marcina, Adama, Jana, Jastrzębskich po 1 dymie – dymów 14 dymówcard 1)
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Michał, Jastrzębski Benedykt, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Krzysztof, Jastrzębski Jakób, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Maciej, Jastrzębski Wojciech, Jastrzębski Fabjan, Jastrzębski Maciej, Jastrzębski Adam, Jastrzębski Jan14 persons on 14 hearths
Fourteen forenames, fourteen hearths — it agrees with „po 1 dymie”. Repeated forenames: Ignacy twice, Maciej twice, Marcin twice — this is no slip of reading; each stands in a different place in the list and each carries a hearth of its own (14 persons = 14 hearths). The surname „Jastrzębskich” is added at the end of the third line, by the right-hand edge, in smaller writing and with a turn downwards (there was not room enough). In the line with the total the author wrote the word „dymów” twice — before the figure and after it („dymów 14 dymów”); the figure 14 underlined. I transcribe it literally.
JastrzębskiMichał
T7514 · each 1w częściach Michała, Benedykta, Ignacego, Marcina, Krzysztofa, Jakóba, Ignacego, Macieja, Wojciecha, Fabjana, Macieja, Marcina, Adama, Jana, Jastrzębskich po 1 dymie – dymów 14 dymówcard 1)
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Benedykt, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Krzysztof, Jastrzębski Jakób, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Maciej, Jastrzębski Wojciech, Jastrzębski Fabjan, Jastrzębski Maciej, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Adam, Jastrzębski Jan14 persons on 14 hearths
Fourteen forenames, fourteen hearths — it agrees with „po 1 dymie”. Repeated forenames: Ignacy twice, Maciej twice, Marcin twice — this is no slip of reading; each stands in a different place in the list and each carries a hearth of its own (14 persons = 14 hearths). The surname „Jastrzębskich” is added at the end of the third line, by the right-hand edge, in smaller writing and with a turn downwards (there was not room enough). In the line with the total the author wrote the word „dymów” twice — before the figure and after it („dymów 14 dymów”); the figure 14 underlined. I transcribe it literally.
JastrzębskiWojciech
T7514 · each 1w częściach Michała, Benedykta, Ignacego, Marcina, Krzysztofa, Jakóba, Ignacego, Macieja, Wojciecha, Fabjana, Macieja, Marcina, Adama, Jana, Jastrzębskich po 1 dymie – dymów 14 dymówcard 1)
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Michał, Jastrzębski Benedykt, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Krzysztof, Jastrzębski Jakób, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Maciej, Jastrzębski Fabjan, Jastrzębski Maciej, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Adam, Jastrzębski Jan14 persons on 14 hearths
Fourteen forenames, fourteen hearths — it agrees with „po 1 dymie”. Repeated forenames: Ignacy twice, Maciej twice, Marcin twice — this is no slip of reading; each stands in a different place in the list and each carries a hearth of its own (14 persons = 14 hearths). The surname „Jastrzębskich” is added at the end of the third line, by the right-hand edge, in smaller writing and with a turn downwards (there was not room enough). In the line with the total the author wrote the word „dymów” twice — before the figure and after it („dymów 14 dymów”); the figure 14 underlined. I transcribe it literally.
IzdebskiStanisław
T751 hearthczęść Stanisława Izdebskiego 1 dymcard 1)
The figure „1” is underlined.
KowieskiPiotr
T751 hearthczęść Piotra Kowieskiego 1 dymcard 1)
I read the surname as „Kowieskiego” (K-o-w-i-e-s-k-i-e-g-o); the form „Kowieski” is already attested in the patterns of the card index. The figure „1” underlined; beneath it, in the lower right-hand corner of the card, the card's own total „Razem 24 dymów” (the figure doubly underlined).
1789 T89Hearth tax register 1789
JastrzębskiJan
T892 hearthscz. Jana Jastrzębskiego 2 d. dwor. — zob. Dziewule;card 2)
The addition „— zob. Dziewule;” in black ink, the rest of the line in blue. The two hearths ENTER into the card's own total: 2+16+3+1+1+1 = 24 = „Razem 24 dymy”. This entry is answered by the reference mark „F) zob. Dziewule.—” in T90 on the same card, there already without a number of hearths.
JastrzębskiAdam
T8916 · each 1cz. Jana [wykreślone], Tomasza, Marcina, Michała, Pawła, Marcina po Joachymie, Szymona, Ignacego, Macieja-Dworczyka, Fabiana, Ignacego po Mateuszu, Mateusza, Józefa, Marcina, sukcesorów Marcina, Teresy wdowy, Adama Jastrzębskich po 1 d. = 16 d. dwor.card 2)
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Tomasz, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Michał, Jastrzębski Paweł, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Szymon, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Maciej «Dworczyk», Jastrzębski Fabian, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Mateusz, Jastrzębski Józef, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Marcin †, Jastrzębski Teresa16 persons on 16 hearths
Sixteen persons, sixteen hearths. The first forename of the line — „Jana” — is STRUCK OUT with a clear zigzag (unlike in T90 of the same card, where the same word is merely crossed through once and still counts toward the total) and does not enter into the sixteen; without it there come out exactly 16 forenames, and the card's own total closes. The figure „6” in „16” is corrected in black ink — the card's total (24) confirms the reading of 16. THE UNIT „d. dwor.”: I do not expand the abbreviation and therefore do NOT fill in the breakdown of buildings. The card index sometimes has the record „(każdy po 1 dworze) = 7 d.”, which divides the hearths among manor houses — here the card writes „po 1 d.” (per hearth) and only then furnishes the total with the abbreviation „d. dwor.”, so I am not certain whether this means „dymów dworskich” (a hearth class, as with „dymy wiejskie 2giej klasy” in T90) or „dworów” (a type of building). I will not guess — a matter for the owner to decide, described in the report.
JastrzębskiFabian
T8916 · each 1cz. Jana [wykreślone], Tomasza, Marcina, Michała, Pawła, Marcina po Joachymie, Szymona, Ignacego, Macieja-Dworczyka, Fabiana, Ignacego po Mateuszu, Mateusza, Józefa, Marcina, sukcesorów Marcina, Teresy wdowy, Adama Jastrzębskich po 1 d. = 16 d. dwor.card 2)
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Tomasz, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Michał, Jastrzębski Paweł, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Szymon, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Maciej «Dworczyk», Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Mateusz, Jastrzębski Józef, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Marcin †, Jastrzębski Teresa, Jastrzębski Adam16 persons on 16 hearths
Sixteen persons, sixteen hearths. The first forename of the line — „Jana” — is STRUCK OUT with a clear zigzag (unlike in T90 of the same card, where the same word is merely crossed through once and still counts toward the total) and does not enter into the sixteen; without it there come out exactly 16 forenames, and the card's own total closes. The figure „6” in „16” is corrected in black ink — the card's total (24) confirms the reading of 16. THE UNIT „d. dwor.”: I do not expand the abbreviation and therefore do NOT fill in the breakdown of buildings. The card index sometimes has the record „(każdy po 1 dworze) = 7 d.”, which divides the hearths among manor houses — here the card writes „po 1 d.” (per hearth) and only then furnishes the total with the abbreviation „d. dwor.”, so I am not certain whether this means „dymów dworskich” (a hearth class, as with „dymy wiejskie 2giej klasy” in T90) or „dworów” (a type of building). I will not guess — a matter for the owner to decide, described in the report.
the wording on the card is closer to „Fobiana”; I read „Fabiana”, because the same person stands in T90 on the same card as „Fabiana” [reading uncertain as to the vowel]
JastrzębskiIgnacy
T8916 · each 1cz. Jana [wykreślone], Tomasza, Marcina, Michała, Pawła, Marcina po Joachymie, Szymona, Ignacego, Macieja-Dworczyka, Fabiana, Ignacego po Mateuszu, Mateusza, Józefa, Marcina, sukcesorów Marcina, Teresy wdowy, Adama Jastrzębskich po 1 d. = 16 d. dwor.card 2)
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Tomasz, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Michał, Jastrzębski Paweł, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Szymon, Jastrzębski Maciej «Dworczyk», Jastrzębski Fabian, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Mateusz, Jastrzębski Józef, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Marcin †, Jastrzębski Teresa, Jastrzębski Adam16 persons on 16 hearths
Sixteen persons, sixteen hearths. The first forename of the line — „Jana” — is STRUCK OUT with a clear zigzag (unlike in T90 of the same card, where the same word is merely crossed through once and still counts toward the total) and does not enter into the sixteen; without it there come out exactly 16 forenames, and the card's own total closes. The figure „6” in „16” is corrected in black ink — the card's total (24) confirms the reading of 16. THE UNIT „d. dwor.”: I do not expand the abbreviation and therefore do NOT fill in the breakdown of buildings. The card index sometimes has the record „(każdy po 1 dworze) = 7 d.”, which divides the hearths among manor houses — here the card writes „po 1 d.” (per hearth) and only then furnishes the total with the abbreviation „d. dwor.”, so I am not certain whether this means „dymów dworskich” (a hearth class, as with „dymy wiejskie 2giej klasy” in T90) or „dworów” (a type of building). I will not guess — a matter for the owner to decide, described in the report.
JastrzębskiIgnacy
T8916 · each 1cz. Jana [wykreślone], Tomasza, Marcina, Michała, Pawła, Marcina po Joachymie, Szymona, Ignacego, Macieja-Dworczyka, Fabiana, Ignacego po Mateuszu, Mateusza, Józefa, Marcina, sukcesorów Marcina, Teresy wdowy, Adama Jastrzębskich po 1 d. = 16 d. dwor.card 2)
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Tomasz, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Michał, Jastrzębski Paweł, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Szymon, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Maciej «Dworczyk», Jastrzębski Fabian, Jastrzębski Mateusz, Jastrzębski Józef, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Marcin †, Jastrzębski Teresa, Jastrzębski Adam16 persons on 16 hearths
Sixteen persons, sixteen hearths. The first forename of the line — „Jana” — is STRUCK OUT with a clear zigzag (unlike in T90 of the same card, where the same word is merely crossed through once and still counts toward the total) and does not enter into the sixteen; without it there come out exactly 16 forenames, and the card's own total closes. The figure „6” in „16” is corrected in black ink — the card's total (24) confirms the reading of 16. THE UNIT „d. dwor.”: I do not expand the abbreviation and therefore do NOT fill in the breakdown of buildings. The card index sometimes has the record „(każdy po 1 dworze) = 7 d.”, which divides the hearths among manor houses — here the card writes „po 1 d.” (per hearth) and only then furnishes the total with the abbreviation „d. dwor.”, so I am not certain whether this means „dymów dworskich” (a hearth class, as with „dymy wiejskie 2giej klasy” in T90) or „dworów” (a type of building). I will not guess — a matter for the owner to decide, described in the report.
the card adds „po Mateuszu”
JastrzębskiJózef
T8916 · each 1cz. Jana [wykreślone], Tomasza, Marcina, Michała, Pawła, Marcina po Joachymie, Szymona, Ignacego, Macieja-Dworczyka, Fabiana, Ignacego po Mateuszu, Mateusza, Józefa, Marcina, sukcesorów Marcina, Teresy wdowy, Adama Jastrzębskich po 1 d. = 16 d. dwor.card 2)
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Tomasz, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Michał, Jastrzębski Paweł, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Szymon, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Maciej «Dworczyk», Jastrzębski Fabian, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Mateusz, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Marcin †, Jastrzębski Teresa, Jastrzębski Adam16 persons on 16 hearths
Sixteen persons, sixteen hearths. The first forename of the line — „Jana” — is STRUCK OUT with a clear zigzag (unlike in T90 of the same card, where the same word is merely crossed through once and still counts toward the total) and does not enter into the sixteen; without it there come out exactly 16 forenames, and the card's own total closes. The figure „6” in „16” is corrected in black ink — the card's total (24) confirms the reading of 16. THE UNIT „d. dwor.”: I do not expand the abbreviation and therefore do NOT fill in the breakdown of buildings. The card index sometimes has the record „(każdy po 1 dworze) = 7 d.”, which divides the hearths among manor houses — here the card writes „po 1 d.” (per hearth) and only then furnishes the total with the abbreviation „d. dwor.”, so I am not certain whether this means „dymów dworskich” (a hearth class, as with „dymy wiejskie 2giej klasy” in T90) or „dworów” (a type of building). I will not guess — a matter for the owner to decide, described in the report.
JastrzębskiMaciej«Dworczyk»
T8916 · each 1cz. Jana [wykreślone], Tomasza, Marcina, Michała, Pawła, Marcina po Joachymie, Szymona, Ignacego, Macieja-Dworczyka, Fabiana, Ignacego po Mateuszu, Mateusza, Józefa, Marcina, sukcesorów Marcina, Teresy wdowy, Adama Jastrzębskich po 1 d. = 16 d. dwor.card 2)
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Tomasz, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Michał, Jastrzębski Paweł, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Szymon, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Fabian, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Mateusz, Jastrzębski Józef, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Marcin †, Jastrzębski Teresa, Jastrzębski Adam16 persons on 16 hearths
Sixteen persons, sixteen hearths. The first forename of the line — „Jana” — is STRUCK OUT with a clear zigzag (unlike in T90 of the same card, where the same word is merely crossed through once and still counts toward the total) and does not enter into the sixteen; without it there come out exactly 16 forenames, and the card's own total closes. The figure „6” in „16” is corrected in black ink — the card's total (24) confirms the reading of 16. THE UNIT „d. dwor.”: I do not expand the abbreviation and therefore do NOT fill in the breakdown of buildings. The card index sometimes has the record „(każdy po 1 dworze) = 7 d.”, which divides the hearths among manor houses — here the card writes „po 1 d.” (per hearth) and only then furnishes the total with the abbreviation „d. dwor.”, so I am not certain whether this means „dymów dworskich” (a hearth class, as with „dymy wiejskie 2giej klasy” in T90) or „dworów” (a type of building). I will not guess — a matter for the owner to decide, described in the report.
on the card with a hyphen: „Macieja-Dworczyka”
JastrzębskiMarcin
T8916 · each 1cz. Jana [wykreślone], Tomasza, Marcina, Michała, Pawła, Marcina po Joachymie, Szymona, Ignacego, Macieja-Dworczyka, Fabiana, Ignacego po Mateuszu, Mateusza, Józefa, Marcina, sukcesorów Marcina, Teresy wdowy, Adama Jastrzębskich po 1 d. = 16 d. dwor.card 2)
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Tomasz, Jastrzębski Michał, Jastrzębski Paweł, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Szymon, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Maciej «Dworczyk», Jastrzębski Fabian, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Mateusz, Jastrzębski Józef, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Marcin †, Jastrzębski Teresa, Jastrzębski Adam16 persons on 16 hearths
Sixteen persons, sixteen hearths. The first forename of the line — „Jana” — is STRUCK OUT with a clear zigzag (unlike in T90 of the same card, where the same word is merely crossed through once and still counts toward the total) and does not enter into the sixteen; without it there come out exactly 16 forenames, and the card's own total closes. The figure „6” in „16” is corrected in black ink — the card's total (24) confirms the reading of 16. THE UNIT „d. dwor.”: I do not expand the abbreviation and therefore do NOT fill in the breakdown of buildings. The card index sometimes has the record „(każdy po 1 dworze) = 7 d.”, which divides the hearths among manor houses — here the card writes „po 1 d.” (per hearth) and only then furnishes the total with the abbreviation „d. dwor.”, so I am not certain whether this means „dymów dworskich” (a hearth class, as with „dymy wiejskie 2giej klasy” in T90) or „dworów” (a type of building). I will not guess — a matter for the owner to decide, described in the report.
JastrzębskiMarcin
T8916 · each 1cz. Jana [wykreślone], Tomasza, Marcina, Michała, Pawła, Marcina po Joachymie, Szymona, Ignacego, Macieja-Dworczyka, Fabiana, Ignacego po Mateuszu, Mateusza, Józefa, Marcina, sukcesorów Marcina, Teresy wdowy, Adama Jastrzębskich po 1 d. = 16 d. dwor.card 2)
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Tomasz, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Michał, Jastrzębski Paweł, Jastrzębski Szymon, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Maciej «Dworczyk», Jastrzębski Fabian, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Mateusz, Jastrzębski Józef, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Marcin †, Jastrzębski Teresa, Jastrzębski Adam16 persons on 16 hearths
Sixteen persons, sixteen hearths. The first forename of the line — „Jana” — is STRUCK OUT with a clear zigzag (unlike in T90 of the same card, where the same word is merely crossed through once and still counts toward the total) and does not enter into the sixteen; without it there come out exactly 16 forenames, and the card's own total closes. The figure „6” in „16” is corrected in black ink — the card's total (24) confirms the reading of 16. THE UNIT „d. dwor.”: I do not expand the abbreviation and therefore do NOT fill in the breakdown of buildings. The card index sometimes has the record „(każdy po 1 dworze) = 7 d.”, which divides the hearths among manor houses — here the card writes „po 1 d.” (per hearth) and only then furnishes the total with the abbreviation „d. dwor.”, so I am not certain whether this means „dymów dworskich” (a hearth class, as with „dymy wiejskie 2giej klasy” in T90) or „dworów” (a type of building). I will not guess — a matter for the owner to decide, described in the report.
the card adds „po Joachymie” — presumably the same one whom T90 calls „Marcina syna Joachima”; I make no merger
JastrzębskiMarcin
T8916 · each 1cz. Jana [wykreślone], Tomasza, Marcina, Michała, Pawła, Marcina po Joachymie, Szymona, Ignacego, Macieja-Dworczyka, Fabiana, Ignacego po Mateuszu, Mateusza, Józefa, Marcina, sukcesorów Marcina, Teresy wdowy, Adama Jastrzębskich po 1 d. = 16 d. dwor.card 2)
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Tomasz, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Michał, Jastrzębski Paweł, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Szymon, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Maciej «Dworczyk», Jastrzębski Fabian, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Mateusz, Jastrzębski Józef, Jastrzębski Marcin †, Jastrzębski Teresa, Jastrzębski Adam16 persons on 16 hearths
Sixteen persons, sixteen hearths. The first forename of the line — „Jana” — is STRUCK OUT with a clear zigzag (unlike in T90 of the same card, where the same word is merely crossed through once and still counts toward the total) and does not enter into the sixteen; without it there come out exactly 16 forenames, and the card's own total closes. The figure „6” in „16” is corrected in black ink — the card's total (24) confirms the reading of 16. THE UNIT „d. dwor.”: I do not expand the abbreviation and therefore do NOT fill in the breakdown of buildings. The card index sometimes has the record „(każdy po 1 dworze) = 7 d.”, which divides the hearths among manor houses — here the card writes „po 1 d.” (per hearth) and only then furnishes the total with the abbreviation „d. dwor.”, so I am not certain whether this means „dymów dworskich” (a hearth class, as with „dymy wiejskie 2giej klasy” in T90) or „dworów” (a type of building). I will not guess — a matter for the owner to decide, described in the report.
JastrzębskiMarcin†
T8916 · each 1successors† deceasedcz. Jana [wykreślone], Tomasza, Marcina, Michała, Pawła, Marcina po Joachymie, Szymona, Ignacego, Macieja-Dworczyka, Fabiana, Ignacego po Mateuszu, Mateusza, Józefa, Marcina, sukcesorów Marcina, Teresy wdowy, Adama Jastrzębskich po 1 d. = 16 d. dwor.card 2)
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Tomasz, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Michał, Jastrzębski Paweł, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Szymon, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Maciej «Dworczyk», Jastrzębski Fabian, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Mateusz, Jastrzębski Józef, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Teresa, Jastrzębski Adam16 persons on 16 hearths
Sixteen persons, sixteen hearths. The first forename of the line — „Jana” — is STRUCK OUT with a clear zigzag (unlike in T90 of the same card, where the same word is merely crossed through once and still counts toward the total) and does not enter into the sixteen; without it there come out exactly 16 forenames, and the card's own total closes. The figure „6” in „16” is corrected in black ink — the card's total (24) confirms the reading of 16. THE UNIT „d. dwor.”: I do not expand the abbreviation and therefore do NOT fill in the breakdown of buildings. The card index sometimes has the record „(każdy po 1 dworze) = 7 d.”, which divides the hearths among manor houses — here the card writes „po 1 d.” (per hearth) and only then furnishes the total with the abbreviation „d. dwor.”, so I am not certain whether this means „dymów dworskich” (a hearth class, as with „dymy wiejskie 2giej klasy” in T90) or „dworów” (a type of building). I will not guess — a matter for the owner to decide, described in the report.
the card: „sukcesorów Marcina” — a person named, but already deceased
JastrzębskiMateusz
T8916 · each 1cz. Jana [wykreślone], Tomasza, Marcina, Michała, Pawła, Marcina po Joachymie, Szymona, Ignacego, Macieja-Dworczyka, Fabiana, Ignacego po Mateuszu, Mateusza, Józefa, Marcina, sukcesorów Marcina, Teresy wdowy, Adama Jastrzębskich po 1 d. = 16 d. dwor.card 2)
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Tomasz, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Michał, Jastrzębski Paweł, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Szymon, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Maciej «Dworczyk», Jastrzębski Fabian, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Józef, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Marcin †, Jastrzębski Teresa, Jastrzębski Adam16 persons on 16 hearths
Sixteen persons, sixteen hearths. The first forename of the line — „Jana” — is STRUCK OUT with a clear zigzag (unlike in T90 of the same card, where the same word is merely crossed through once and still counts toward the total) and does not enter into the sixteen; without it there come out exactly 16 forenames, and the card's own total closes. The figure „6” in „16” is corrected in black ink — the card's total (24) confirms the reading of 16. THE UNIT „d. dwor.”: I do not expand the abbreviation and therefore do NOT fill in the breakdown of buildings. The card index sometimes has the record „(każdy po 1 dworze) = 7 d.”, which divides the hearths among manor houses — here the card writes „po 1 d.” (per hearth) and only then furnishes the total with the abbreviation „d. dwor.”, so I am not certain whether this means „dymów dworskich” (a hearth class, as with „dymy wiejskie 2giej klasy” in T90) or „dworów” (a type of building). I will not guess — a matter for the owner to decide, described in the report.
JastrzębskiMichał
T8916 · each 1cz. Jana [wykreślone], Tomasza, Marcina, Michała, Pawła, Marcina po Joachymie, Szymona, Ignacego, Macieja-Dworczyka, Fabiana, Ignacego po Mateuszu, Mateusza, Józefa, Marcina, sukcesorów Marcina, Teresy wdowy, Adama Jastrzębskich po 1 d. = 16 d. dwor.card 2)
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Tomasz, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Paweł, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Szymon, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Maciej «Dworczyk», Jastrzębski Fabian, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Mateusz, Jastrzębski Józef, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Marcin †, Jastrzębski Teresa, Jastrzębski Adam16 persons on 16 hearths
Sixteen persons, sixteen hearths. The first forename of the line — „Jana” — is STRUCK OUT with a clear zigzag (unlike in T90 of the same card, where the same word is merely crossed through once and still counts toward the total) and does not enter into the sixteen; without it there come out exactly 16 forenames, and the card's own total closes. The figure „6” in „16” is corrected in black ink — the card's total (24) confirms the reading of 16. THE UNIT „d. dwor.”: I do not expand the abbreviation and therefore do NOT fill in the breakdown of buildings. The card index sometimes has the record „(każdy po 1 dworze) = 7 d.”, which divides the hearths among manor houses — here the card writes „po 1 d.” (per hearth) and only then furnishes the total with the abbreviation „d. dwor.”, so I am not certain whether this means „dymów dworskich” (a hearth class, as with „dymy wiejskie 2giej klasy” in T90) or „dworów” (a type of building). I will not guess — a matter for the owner to decide, described in the report.
JastrzębskiPaweł
T8916 · each 1cz. Jana [wykreślone], Tomasza, Marcina, Michała, Pawła, Marcina po Joachymie, Szymona, Ignacego, Macieja-Dworczyka, Fabiana, Ignacego po Mateuszu, Mateusza, Józefa, Marcina, sukcesorów Marcina, Teresy wdowy, Adama Jastrzębskich po 1 d. = 16 d. dwor.card 2)
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Tomasz, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Michał, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Szymon, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Maciej «Dworczyk», Jastrzębski Fabian, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Mateusz, Jastrzębski Józef, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Marcin †, Jastrzębski Teresa, Jastrzębski Adam16 persons on 16 hearths
Sixteen persons, sixteen hearths. The first forename of the line — „Jana” — is STRUCK OUT with a clear zigzag (unlike in T90 of the same card, where the same word is merely crossed through once and still counts toward the total) and does not enter into the sixteen; without it there come out exactly 16 forenames, and the card's own total closes. The figure „6” in „16” is corrected in black ink — the card's total (24) confirms the reading of 16. THE UNIT „d. dwor.”: I do not expand the abbreviation and therefore do NOT fill in the breakdown of buildings. The card index sometimes has the record „(każdy po 1 dworze) = 7 d.”, which divides the hearths among manor houses — here the card writes „po 1 d.” (per hearth) and only then furnishes the total with the abbreviation „d. dwor.”, so I am not certain whether this means „dymów dworskich” (a hearth class, as with „dymy wiejskie 2giej klasy” in T90) or „dworów” (a type of building). I will not guess — a matter for the owner to decide, described in the report.
JastrzębskiSzymon
T8916 · each 1cz. Jana [wykreślone], Tomasza, Marcina, Michała, Pawła, Marcina po Joachymie, Szymona, Ignacego, Macieja-Dworczyka, Fabiana, Ignacego po Mateuszu, Mateusza, Józefa, Marcina, sukcesorów Marcina, Teresy wdowy, Adama Jastrzębskich po 1 d. = 16 d. dwor.card 2)
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Tomasz, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Michał, Jastrzębski Paweł, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Maciej «Dworczyk», Jastrzębski Fabian, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Mateusz, Jastrzębski Józef, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Marcin †, Jastrzębski Teresa, Jastrzębski Adam16 persons on 16 hearths
Sixteen persons, sixteen hearths. The first forename of the line — „Jana” — is STRUCK OUT with a clear zigzag (unlike in T90 of the same card, where the same word is merely crossed through once and still counts toward the total) and does not enter into the sixteen; without it there come out exactly 16 forenames, and the card's own total closes. The figure „6” in „16” is corrected in black ink — the card's total (24) confirms the reading of 16. THE UNIT „d. dwor.”: I do not expand the abbreviation and therefore do NOT fill in the breakdown of buildings. The card index sometimes has the record „(każdy po 1 dworze) = 7 d.”, which divides the hearths among manor houses — here the card writes „po 1 d.” (per hearth) and only then furnishes the total with the abbreviation „d. dwor.”, so I am not certain whether this means „dymów dworskich” (a hearth class, as with „dymy wiejskie 2giej klasy” in T90) or „dworów” (a type of building). I will not guess — a matter for the owner to decide, described in the report.
JastrzębskaTeresa
T8916 · each 1widowcz. Jana [wykreślone], Tomasza, Marcina, Michała, Pawła, Marcina po Joachymie, Szymona, Ignacego, Macieja-Dworczyka, Fabiana, Ignacego po Mateuszu, Mateusza, Józefa, Marcina, sukcesorów Marcina, Teresy wdowy, Adama Jastrzębskich po 1 d. = 16 d. dwor.card 2)
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Tomasz, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Michał, Jastrzębski Paweł, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Szymon, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Maciej «Dworczyk», Jastrzębski Fabian, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Mateusz, Jastrzębski Józef, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Marcin †, Jastrzębski Adam16 persons on 16 hearths
Sixteen persons, sixteen hearths. The first forename of the line — „Jana” — is STRUCK OUT with a clear zigzag (unlike in T90 of the same card, where the same word is merely crossed through once and still counts toward the total) and does not enter into the sixteen; without it there come out exactly 16 forenames, and the card's own total closes. The figure „6” in „16” is corrected in black ink — the card's total (24) confirms the reading of 16. THE UNIT „d. dwor.”: I do not expand the abbreviation and therefore do NOT fill in the breakdown of buildings. The card index sometimes has the record „(każdy po 1 dworze) = 7 d.”, which divides the hearths among manor houses — here the card writes „po 1 d.” (per hearth) and only then furnishes the total with the abbreviation „d. dwor.”, so I am not certain whether this means „dymów dworskich” (a hearth class, as with „dymy wiejskie 2giej klasy” in T90) or „dworów” (a type of building). I will not guess — a matter for the owner to decide, described in the report.
A WOMAN with a forename of her own: the card writes „Teresy wdowy”, that is it gives a forename and not merely a husband-derived form — hence the given name = „Teresa”, and the recorded form of the name is left empty. The widow is alive, so the mark for a deceased person is empty; the card does not say by whom she was widowed, and I do not supply it. The surname comes from the collective member „Jastrzębskich” — it stands there in the masculine plural, so I record „Jastrzębski”, and the sex is recognised from the forename.
JastrzębskiTomasz
T8916 · each 1cz. Jana [wykreślone], Tomasza, Marcina, Michała, Pawła, Marcina po Joachymie, Szymona, Ignacego, Macieja-Dworczyka, Fabiana, Ignacego po Mateuszu, Mateusza, Józefa, Marcina, sukcesorów Marcina, Teresy wdowy, Adama Jastrzębskich po 1 d. = 16 d. dwor.card 2)
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Michał, Jastrzębski Paweł, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Szymon, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Maciej «Dworczyk», Jastrzębski Fabian, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Mateusz, Jastrzębski Józef, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Marcin †, Jastrzębski Teresa, Jastrzębski Adam16 persons on 16 hearths
Sixteen persons, sixteen hearths. The first forename of the line — „Jana” — is STRUCK OUT with a clear zigzag (unlike in T90 of the same card, where the same word is merely crossed through once and still counts toward the total) and does not enter into the sixteen; without it there come out exactly 16 forenames, and the card's own total closes. The figure „6” in „16” is corrected in black ink — the card's total (24) confirms the reading of 16. THE UNIT „d. dwor.”: I do not expand the abbreviation and therefore do NOT fill in the breakdown of buildings. The card index sometimes has the record „(każdy po 1 dworze) = 7 d.”, which divides the hearths among manor houses — here the card writes „po 1 d.” (per hearth) and only then furnishes the total with the abbreviation „d. dwor.”, so I am not certain whether this means „dymów dworskich” (a hearth class, as with „dymy wiejskie 2giej klasy” in T90) or „dworów” (a type of building). I will not guess — a matter for the owner to decide, described in the report.
BorkowskiAleksander
T893 · each 1cz. Elżbiety, Franciszka, Alexandra Borkowskich po 1 d. = 3 d. dw.card 2)
the same entry also names: Borkowski Elżbieta, Borkowski Franciszek3 persons on 3 hearths
Three persons, three hearths — it agrees with „po 1 d.”. The abbreviation of the unit is here shorter („d. dw.”) than in entry 2 („d. dwor.”); I expand neither the one nor the other.
on the card „Alexandra”, with an „x” — I record the forename as it stands
BorkowskaElżbieta
T893 · each 1cz. Elżbiety, Franciszka, Alexandra Borkowskich po 1 d. = 3 d. dw.card 2)
the same entry also names: Borkowski Franciszek, Borkowski Alexander3 persons on 3 hearths
Three persons, three hearths — it agrees with „po 1 d.”. The abbreviation of the unit is here shorter („d. dw.”) than in entry 2 („d. dwor.”); I expand neither the one nor the other.
A WOMAN. The surname stands on the card once, in the collective member in the masculine plural („Borkowskich”), so I record „Borkowski”, and the sex is recognised from the forename — as the brief requires. The same person in T90 on the same card occurs in the feminine form and as already deceased („z cz. po Elżbiecie Borkowskiej”); here, in the year 1789, she is alive and holds 1 hearth.
BorkowskiFranciszek
T893 · each 1cz. Elżbiety, Franciszka, Alexandra Borkowskich po 1 d. = 3 d. dw.card 2)
the same entry also names: Borkowski Elżbieta, Borkowski Alexander3 persons on 3 hearths
Three persons, three hearths — it agrees with „po 1 d.”. The abbreviation of the unit is here shorter („d. dw.”) than in entry 2 („d. dwor.”); I expand neither the one nor the other.
KowieskiBartłomiej
T891 hearthcz. Bartłomieja Kowieskiego 1 d. dwor.;card 2)
The same person as in T90, entry C, on the same card.
WilewińskiPiotr
T891 hearthcz. Piotra Wilewińskiego 1 d. dw.card 2)
A person absent from both T75 (card 1) and T90 on the same card — occurring in this village only once. All the more does the surname require a decision from the owner (see the note at the person).
SURNAME [reading uncertain]. It stands in the same line as entry 4, on the right-hand side of the card, at the very edge. I read „Wilewińskiego”: certain are „Wil-” at the beginning and „-skiego” at the end, and certain too is the oblique diacritic over the penultimate consonant of the root (this is „ń”). Uncertain are two letters between „Wil” and „ń”: I see a small round letter and a double arc, which I read as „e” + „w”. An alternative reading, which I do not exclude: „Wilczyńskiego” (in which case the round letter would be „c” and the double arc „z” descending, then „y”) — the form „Wilczyński” IS attested in the card index, but in a different parish (Krasusy Łęcznowola i Wylany, parish Trzebieszów), so it cannot settle this card for me. The card index has not so far known the form „Wilewiński” — I report this.
IzdebskiJakub
T891 · share of 0.50cz. Jakuba i Jana Izdebskich po 1 d. [wykreślone] = 1 d. dwor.card 2)
the same entry also names: Izdebski Jan2 persons on 1 hearth
TWO PERSONS, ONE HEARTH — and the card itself explains it: the original „po 1 d.” is STRUCK OUT with a horizontal stroke, and the result corrected to „= 1 d. dwor.” in black ink (the figure „1” thick, written after the correction). That is, the author first counted a hearth for each of the two brothers, then reduced them to one in all. The card's own total confirms the correction: 2+16+3+1+1+1 = 24 = „Razem 24 dymy;”, whereas with two hearths it would come to 25. The total stands on the right in the same line, underlined with a stroke running across the whole width of the card.
IzdebskiJan
T891 · share of 0.50cz. Jakuba i Jana Izdebskich po 1 d. [wykreślone] = 1 d. dwor.card 2)
the same entry also names: Izdebski Jakub2 persons on 1 hearth
TWO PERSONS, ONE HEARTH — and the card itself explains it: the original „po 1 d.” is STRUCK OUT with a horizontal stroke, and the result corrected to „= 1 d. dwor.” in black ink (the figure „1” thick, written after the correction). That is, the author first counted a hearth for each of the two brothers, then reduced them to one in all. The card's own total confirms the correction: 2+16+3+1+1+1 = 24 = „Razem 24 dymy;”, whereas with two hearths it would come to 25. The total stands on the right in the same line, underlined with a stroke running across the whole width of the card.
1789 T₀89List of possessors of holdings of 1789
JastrzębskiKrzysztof
T₀89T₀89 – Borkj Kosiorkj – cz. Krzysztofa Jastrzębskiegocard 4)
The first entry of the list still stands in the line with the siglum and the village name, on the right-hand side of the card; the following ones run in two columns. Outside the brace „nie wysiewają 10 korcy”.
BorkowskiPaweł
T₀89„ Pawła Borkowskiegocard 4)
JastrzębskiFranciszek
T₀89„ Franciszka Jastrzębskiegocard 4)
KowieskiBartłomiej
T₀89„ Bartłomieja Kowieskiegocard 4)
The last, eleventh line of the left-hand column.
IzdebskiJakub
T₀89cz. Jakóba Izdebskiegocard 4)
The first entry of the right-hand column, above the horizontal stroke — OUTSIDE the brace. The forename on the card is „Jakóba”, with an „ó”.
JastrzębskaTeresa
T₀89cz. Teresy Jastrzębskiejcard 4)
A WOMAN with a forename of her own and a surname in the FEMININE form — I record it as it stands on the card („Teresy Jastrzębskiej”), so the surname = „Jastrzębska”, and the recorded form of the name is left empty, because the card gives a forename of her own. Probably the same person whom T89 on card 2) calls „Teresy wdowy” among the Jastrzębskis, but I do not merge them — that is a task for the index stage. Here the card does not say that she is a widow, so I leave the status empty. OUTSIDE the brace.
ŁugowskiTomasz
T₀89cz. Tomasza Ługowskiegocard 4)
The last entry ABOVE the horizontal stroke — still OUTSIDE the brace; the stroke runs just below this line. A surname from outside the village's roster so far; the form „Ługowski” is attested in the card index's patterns. I read the initial as „Ł” [uncertain reading as to the stroke of the Ł itself — the loop of the capital letter is sweeping and the crossbar merges with the flourish].
JastrzębskiMichał
T₀89does not sow 10 korce bracecz. Michała Jastrzębskiegocard 4)
The FIRST entry below the horizontal stroke, that is the first one taken in by the brace; beside it stands the full „cz.”, beside the following ones a repetition mark. The entry is taken in by a great brace running along the right-hand edge of the card with the vertical inscription „nie wysiewają 10 korcy” — hence the annotation. The brace takes in all eleven entries of the lower block of the right-hand column (entries 16–26), from „cz. Michała Jastrzębskiego” to „Adama Jastrzębskiego”.
JastrzębskiMarcin
T₀89does not sow 10 korce brace„ Marcina Jastrzębskiegocard 4)
The entry is taken in by a large brace running along the right-hand edge of the card, with the vertical inscription „nie wysiewają 10 korcy” — hence the annotation. The brace takes in all eleven entries of the lower block of the right-hand column (entries 16–26), from „cz. Michała Jastrzębskiego” to „Adama Jastrzębskiego”.
JastrzębskiMichał
T₀89does not sow 10 korce brace„ Michała Jastrzębskiegocard 4)
The second Michał Jastrzębski in this block; the card does not distinguish between them. The entry is taken in by a large brace running along the right-hand edge of the card, with the vertical inscription „nie wysiewają 10 korcy” — hence the annotation. The brace takes in all eleven entries of the lower block of the right-hand column (entries 16–26), from „cz. Michała Jastrzębskiego” to „Adama Jastrzębskiego”.
JastrzębskiMarcin
T₀89does not sow 10 korce brace„ Marcina Jastrzębskiegocard 4)
The second Marcin Jastrzębski in this block; the card does not distinguish them (in T90 and T94 they presumably correspond to „Marcin syn Pawła” and „Marcin syn Joachima”, but here there is no such addition and I do not supply one). The entry is taken in by the great brace running along the right-hand edge of the card with the vertical inscription „nie wysiewają 10 korcy” — hence the annotation. The brace takes in all eleven entries of the lower block of the right-hand column (entries 16–26), from „cz. Michała Jastrzębskiego” to „Adama Jastrzębskiego”.
JastrzębskiTomasz
T₀89cz. Tomasza Jastrzębskiegocard 4)
The first line of the left-hand column; beside it the full „cz.”, beside the further ones only the repetition mark („).
JastrzębskiPaweł
T₀89does not sow 10 korce brace„ Pawła Jastrzębskiegocard 4)
The entry is taken in by a large brace running along the right-hand edge of the card, with the vertical inscription „nie wysiewają 10 korcy” — hence the annotation. The brace takes in all eleven entries of the lower block of the right-hand column (entries 16–26), from „cz. Michała Jastrzębskiego” to „Adama Jastrzębskiego”.
BorkowskaElżbieta
T₀89does not sow 10 korce brace„ Elżbiety Borkowskiejcard 4)
A WOMAN with a forename of her own and a surname in the FEMININE form, recorded as it stands on the card. According to T89 (card 2), the same year 1789) Elżbieta Borkowska is then alive and holds 1 hearth — the mark for a deceased person is left empty. Only T90 (card 2) and T94 (card 3) speak of a holding „po Elżbiecie”. The entry is taken in by a great brace running along the right-hand edge of the card with the vertical inscription „nie wysiewają 10 korcy” — hence the annotation. The brace takes in all eleven entries of the lower block of the right-hand column (entries 16–26), from „cz. Michała Jastrzębskiego” to „Adama Jastrzębskiego”.
JastrzębskiSzymon
T₀89does not sow 10 korce brace„ Szymona Jastrzębskiegocard 4)
The forename is written after a correction: several letters in the middle of the word are reworked and flooded with ink, which makes them look thicker than the rest; I read „Szymona” [reading uncertain as to the middle letters] — behind this reading stands the composition of the village, because Szymon Jastrzębski occurs in T90, in T89, and in T94 alike. The entry is taken in by the great brace running along the right-hand edge of the card with the vertical inscription „nie wysiewają 10 korcy” — hence the annotation. The brace takes in all eleven entries of the lower block of the right-hand column (entries 16–26), from „cz. Michała Jastrzębskiego” to „Adama Jastrzębskiego”.
BorkowskiFranciszek
T₀89does not sow 10 korce brace„ Franciszka Borkowskiegocard 4)
The entry is taken in by a large brace running along the right-hand edge of the card, with the vertical inscription „nie wysiewają 10 korcy” — hence the annotation. The brace takes in all eleven entries of the lower block of the right-hand column (entries 16–26), from „cz. Michała Jastrzębskiego” to „Adama Jastrzębskiego”.
Jastrzębski„żony Macieja Jastrzębskiego”
T₀89does not sow 10 korce brace„ żony Macieja Jastrzębskiego ①card 4)
Beside this entry, on the right, stands the SIGN ① — the same as beside „Macieja Jastrzębskiego” in the left-hand column (entry 5); it binds the husband's holding to the wife's. The entry is taken in by a great brace running along the right-hand edge of the card with the vertical inscription „nie wysiewają 10 korcy” — hence the annotation. The brace takes in all eleven entries of the lower block of the right-hand column (entries 16–26), from „cz. Michała Jastrzębskiego” to „Adama Jastrzębskiego”.
A WOMAN. The card gives neither her forename nor her surname — it names her solely through her husband: „żony Macieja Jastrzębskiego” (wife of Maciej Jastrzębski). I record this whole form literally in the recorded form of the name, the given name is left empty. I give the surname in the form it stands on the card, that is the masculine one („Jastrzębski”) — on the card it belongs grammatically to Maciej, not to her, and I do not invent a feminine form for her. I do NOT enter Maciej here as a separate person: the card names him only to show whose wife she is, and his own holding stands in the left-hand column (entry 5), marked with the same sign ①.
BorkowskiAntoni
T₀89does not sow 10 korce brace„ Antoniego Borkowskiegocard 4)
The entry is taken in by a large brace running along the right-hand edge of the card, with the vertical inscription „nie wysiewają 10 korcy” — hence the annotation. The brace takes in all eleven entries of the lower block of the right-hand column (entries 16–26), from „cz. Michała Jastrzębskiego” to „Adama Jastrzębskiego”.
JastrzębskiAdam
T₀89does not sow 10 korce brace„ Adama Jastrzębskiegocard 4)
The LAST entry on card 4) — the line runs right along the bottom edge, but is legible in full. The brace ends at it; on card 5) there is no longer any brace. The entry is taken in by a large brace running along the right-hand edge of the card, with the vertical inscription „nie wysiewają 10 korcy” — hence the annotation. The brace takes in all eleven entries of the lower block of the right-hand column (entries 16–26), from „cz. Michała Jastrzębskiego” to „Adama Jastrzębskiego”.
WysokińskiMarcin
T₀89„ Marcina Wysokińskiegocard 4)
A surname from outside the composition of this village as known hitherto — there are no Wysokińskis in T75, T90, T89 or T94. The reading is certain: „Wysokińskiego”; the form „Wysokiński” is already attested in the patterns of the card index.
JastrzębskiIgnacy
T₀89„ Ignacego Jastrzębskiegocard 4)
The FIRST of two Ignacy Jastrzębski in the left-hand column; the second stands two lines lower (entry 6), after Maciej. The card distinguishes them in no way — unlike T90 and T94, where one of them carries the addition „syna Macieja” / „po Macieju”. I make no decision as to which is which.
JastrzębskiMaciej
T₀89„ Macieja Jastrzębskiego ①card 4)
Beside this entry, on the right, stands the SIGN ① (a 1 in a circle). The same sign recurs in the right-hand column beside „żony Macieja Jastrzębskiego” (entry 24) and binds the two entries together: the husband's holding and the wife's holding. The card does not explain the sign's meaning — I do not expand it. Outside the brace.
JastrzębskiIgnacy
T₀89„ Ignacego Jastrzębskiegocard 4)
The SECOND Ignacy Jastrzębski of the left-hand column (the first in entry 4, two lines higher). The card does not distinguish them.
JastrzębskiFabian
T₀89„ Fabiana Jastrzębskiegocard 4)
JastrzębskiMateusz
T₀89„ Mateusza Jastrzębskiegocard 4)
JastrzębskiJózef
T₀89„ Józefa Jastrzębskiegocard 4)
JasińskiFranciszek Xaweryswordbearer of Łuków (miecznik łukowski)swordbearer of the Land and castle court judge of Łuków (miecznika ziemi i sędz. grodz. Łukow.)tribune of the Land, castle judge and civil-military commissioner of the Łuków Land (wojski ziemi, sędzia grodzki i komisarz cyw.-wojsk. ziemi Łukowskiej)castle court judge of Łuków (sędziego grodzkiego Łukowskiego)swordbearer of Łuków (miecznika Łukowskiego)castle court judge of Łuków (sędzia grodzki łukowski)
T₀89T₀89 – c. d. części na Borkach Xawerego Jasieńskiego, miecz. Łukowskiego. Zob. Dziewule.card 5)
CONTINUATION of the T₀89 transcript from card 4) — the card itself says so with the abbreviation „c. d.” (continued) right after the siglum, and that is why the entry goes into the same transcript, with its own card number. The whole of card 5) carries this one entry. The card says three things about it: that the holding lies „na Borkach” (at Borki), that it is held by Xawery Jasieński, swordbearer of Łuków, and that it is set out under the village of DZIEWULE („Zob. Dziewule.” — see Dziewule). This is already the third cross-reference to Dziewule in this village — the previous two stand in T90 (entry F, card 2) and in T94 (entry 6, card 3), and a fourth, with a number of hearths, in T89 (entry 1, card 2): „cz. Jana Jastrzębskiego 2 d. dwor. — zob. Dziewule”). Dziewule lies outside this study, so Xawery Jasieński's holding cannot be weighed in hearths from this card index — a matter for the owner to decide. The entry lies OUTSIDE the brace „nie wysiewają 10 korcy”, which closes at the bottom of card 4) and does not carry over to this card: card 5) has neither a brace nor a vertical inscription in the margin.
A KEY FIGURE — I record STRICTLY what stands on the card, without merging. FORENAME: „Xawerego”, with an „X” bearing a horizontal stroke over the letter; the card gives ONLY this one forename — it has neither „Franciszka” nor „Ksawerego” nor an initial. I therefore record the given name = „Xawery”, in the card's spelling. SURNAME: „Jasieńskiego”, that is with an „e” between „Jasi-” and „-ńskiego”; I checked this at twenty-times magnification and compared it with the same surname on card 1) (T75, „cz. Jasińskiego”), where that „e” is absent — these are two different spellings on two cards of the same village, and I transcribe both faithfully, each on its own card. OFFICE: the card writes „miecz.” with a full stop and carries the word over to the next line as „Łukowskiego.” — that is, „miecznik łukowski” (swordbearer of Łuków); the expansion of the abbreviation „miecz.” is unambiguous. The card does NOT call him castle court judge of Łuków or any other office — if this is the same person as Franciszek Ksawery Jasiński, castle court judge of Łuków, that is settled at the index stage, not here. HEARTHS: the card gives no figure (and cannot give one — T₀89 knows no hearths); for the full record of this holding the card refers to the village of Dziewule.
1790 T90Hearth tax register 1790
BorkowskaElżbieta
T902 · share of 1A) cz. Tomasza Jastrzębskiego z cz. po Elżbiecie Borkowskiej — 2 dymy wiejskie 2giej klasycard 2)
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Tomasz2 persons on 2 hearths
The figure „2” is underlined. The hearth class („dymy wiejskie 2giej klasy”) is repeated at entries B–D by repetition marks (quotation marks) and recurs in the card's own total. This is a single entry made up of two parts: Tomasz Jastrzębski's own, and the one held after the deceased Elżbieta Borkowska — the card does not divide how many hearths belong to which, so I do not fill in the breakdown of buildings. The phrase „po Elżbiecie Borkowskiej” (after Elżbieta Borkowska) says that the holding passed after her to Tomasz Jastrzębski, but the card does not call her deceased (there is no „sukces.”, „niegdy” or „ś.p.”), so we do not set the death marker — just as with „cz. Antoniego po Piotrze Lipińskim” in Ługi Wielkie. Something else is worth noting: in T89 and T₀89 (1789) Elżbieta Borkowska still holds the part herself, while in T90 (1790) and T94 (1794) the part is already „po niej” (after her).
A WOMAN with a forename of her own and a surname in the feminine form — I record it as it stands on the card („po Elżbiecie Borkowskiej”). the mark for a deceased person = true, because the holding is „PO” her (after her), not „her” (hers). Worth noting: in T89 on the same card (the year 1789) Elżbieta is still alive and holds 1 hearth herself („cz. Elżbiety, Franciszka, Alexandra Borkowskich po 1 d.”); in T90 (the year 1790) her holding is already „po Elżbiecie” and has passed to Tomasz Jastrzębski. I do not merge persons — that is a task for the index stage.
JastrzębskiTomasz
T902 · share of 1A) cz. Tomasza Jastrzębskiego z cz. po Elżbiecie Borkowskiej — 2 dymy wiejskie 2giej klasycard 2)
the same entry also names: Borkowska Elżbieta2 persons on 2 hearths
The figure „2” is underlined. The hearth class („dymy wiejskie 2giej klasy”) is repeated at entries B–D by repetition marks (quotation marks) and recurs in the card's own total. This is a single entry made up of two parts: Tomasz Jastrzębski's own, and the one held after the deceased Elżbieta Borkowska — the card does not divide how many hearths belong to which, so I do not fill in the breakdown of buildings. The phrase „po Elżbiecie Borkowskiej” (after Elżbieta Borkowska) says that the holding passed after her to Tomasz Jastrzębski, but the card does not call her deceased (there is no „sukces.”, „niegdy” or „ś.p.”), so we do not set the death marker — just as with „cz. Antoniego po Piotrze Lipińskim” in Ługi Wielkie. Something else is worth noting: in T89 and T₀89 (1789) Elżbieta Borkowska still holds the part herself, while in T90 (1790) and T94 (1794) the part is already „po niej” (after her).
Jastrzębski„Jakubowej wdowy”
T9015 · each 1widowB) cz. Adama; Franciszka; Ignacego; Ignacego syna Macieja; Jana; Jakubowej wdowy; Krzysztofa; Macieja Dworczyka; Marcina syna Pawła; Marcina syna Joachima; Mateusza; Michała; Pawła; Szymona i Fabiana – Jastrzębskich – po 1 dymie – 15 „ „ „ „;card 2)
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Adam, Jastrzębski Franciszek, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Jan, Jastrzębski Krzysztof, Jastrzębski Maciej «Dworczyk», Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Mateusz, Jastrzębski Michał, Jastrzębski Paweł, Jastrzębski Szymon, Jastrzębski Fabian15 persons on 15 hearths
Fifteen persons, fifteen hearths — it agrees with „po 1 dymie” and with the card's own total (2+15+1+2+1 = 21 = „Razem – 21”). It is precisely this total that settles the dispute over the reworked digits: the figure beside this entry is written in black ink over something earlier and taken on its own could be read as either 15 or 16 — the card's own arithmetic requires 15, and fifteen forenames also give 15, so I read 15. The word „Jana” is gone over in black ink (with a short horizontal stroke above it): if it were taken as struck out, fourteen forenames would remain and the card's total would not close, so I treat this mark as a correction/reinforcement of the writing, not as a deletion. Note: in T89 on the same card „Jana” really is struck out — with a clear zigzag — and there it indeed does not count towards the total. The repetition marks („ „ „ „) in the right-hand margin refer back to „dymy wiejskie 2giej klasy” from entry A.
A WOMAN. The card gives no forename of her own, only the husband-derived form „Jakubowej wdowy” — recorded literally in the recorded form of the name, the given name is left empty. The surname comes from the collective member „– Jastrzębskich –”. I do not expand it: the card does not say which Jakub she was the wife of, and so I set the mark for a deceased person beside that Jakub for no one, because the card does not name this person by a forename of his own.
JastrzębskiAdam
T9015 · each 1B) cz. Adama; Franciszka; Ignacego; Ignacego syna Macieja; Jana; Jakubowej wdowy; Krzysztofa; Macieja Dworczyka; Marcina syna Pawła; Marcina syna Joachima; Mateusza; Michała; Pawła; Szymona i Fabiana – Jastrzębskich – po 1 dymie – 15 „ „ „ „;card 2)
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Franciszek, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Jan, Jastrzębski, Jastrzębski Krzysztof, Jastrzębski Maciej «Dworczyk», Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Mateusz, Jastrzębski Michał, Jastrzębski Paweł, Jastrzębski Szymon, Jastrzębski Fabian15 persons on 15 hearths
Fifteen persons, fifteen hearths — it agrees with „po 1 dymie” and with the card's own total (2+15+1+2+1 = 21 = „Razem – 21”). It is precisely this total that settles the dispute over the reworked digits: the figure beside this entry is written in black ink over something earlier and taken on its own could be read as either 15 or 16 — the card's own arithmetic requires 15, and fifteen forenames also give 15, so I read 15. The word „Jana” is gone over in black ink (with a short horizontal stroke above it): if it were taken as struck out, fourteen forenames would remain and the card's total would not close, so I treat this mark as a correction/reinforcement of the writing, not as a deletion. Note: in T89 on the same card „Jana” really is struck out — with a clear zigzag — and there it indeed does not count towards the total. The repetition marks („ „ „ „) in the right-hand margin refer back to „dymy wiejskie 2giej klasy” from entry A.
JastrzębskiFabian
T9015 · each 1B) cz. Adama; Franciszka; Ignacego; Ignacego syna Macieja; Jana; Jakubowej wdowy; Krzysztofa; Macieja Dworczyka; Marcina syna Pawła; Marcina syna Joachima; Mateusza; Michała; Pawła; Szymona i Fabiana – Jastrzębskich – po 1 dymie – 15 „ „ „ „;card 2)
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Adam, Jastrzębski Franciszek, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Jan, Jastrzębski, Jastrzębski Krzysztof, Jastrzębski Maciej «Dworczyk», Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Mateusz, Jastrzębski Michał, Jastrzębski Paweł, Jastrzębski Szymon15 persons on 15 hearths
Fifteen persons, fifteen hearths — it agrees with „po 1 dymie” and with the card's own total (2+15+1+2+1 = 21 = „Razem – 21”). It is precisely this total that settles the dispute over the reworked digits: the figure beside this entry is written in black ink over something earlier and taken on its own could be read as either 15 or 16 — the card's own arithmetic requires 15, and fifteen forenames also give 15, so I read 15. The word „Jana” is gone over in black ink (with a short horizontal stroke above it): if it were taken as struck out, fourteen forenames would remain and the card's total would not close, so I treat this mark as a correction/reinforcement of the writing, not as a deletion. Note: in T89 on the same card „Jana” really is struck out — with a clear zigzag — and there it indeed does not count towards the total. The repetition marks („ „ „ „) in the right-hand margin refer back to „dymy wiejskie 2giej klasy” from entry A.
the forename gone over and outlined later in black ink, so that it is the thickest word of the line; the reading „Fabiana” is certain — the same person returns in T89 on the same card
JastrzębskiFranciszek
T9015 · each 1B) cz. Adama; Franciszka; Ignacego; Ignacego syna Macieja; Jana; Jakubowej wdowy; Krzysztofa; Macieja Dworczyka; Marcina syna Pawła; Marcina syna Joachima; Mateusza; Michała; Pawła; Szymona i Fabiana – Jastrzębskich – po 1 dymie – 15 „ „ „ „;card 2)
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Adam, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Jan, Jastrzębski, Jastrzębski Krzysztof, Jastrzębski Maciej «Dworczyk», Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Mateusz, Jastrzębski Michał, Jastrzębski Paweł, Jastrzębski Szymon, Jastrzębski Fabian15 persons on 15 hearths
Fifteen persons, fifteen hearths — it agrees with „po 1 dymie” and with the card's own total (2+15+1+2+1 = 21 = „Razem – 21”). It is precisely this total that settles the dispute over the reworked digits: the figure beside this entry is written in black ink over something earlier and taken on its own could be read as either 15 or 16 — the card's own arithmetic requires 15, and fifteen forenames also give 15, so I read 15. The word „Jana” is gone over in black ink (with a short horizontal stroke above it): if it were taken as struck out, fourteen forenames would remain and the card's total would not close, so I treat this mark as a correction/reinforcement of the writing, not as a deletion. Note: in T89 on the same card „Jana” really is struck out — with a clear zigzag — and there it indeed does not count towards the total. The repetition marks („ „ „ „) in the right-hand margin refer back to „dymy wiejskie 2giej klasy” from entry A.
JastrzębskiIgnacy
T9015 · each 1B) cz. Adama; Franciszka; Ignacego; Ignacego syna Macieja; Jana; Jakubowej wdowy; Krzysztofa; Macieja Dworczyka; Marcina syna Pawła; Marcina syna Joachima; Mateusza; Michała; Pawła; Szymona i Fabiana – Jastrzębskich – po 1 dymie – 15 „ „ „ „;card 2)
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Adam, Jastrzębski Franciszek, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Jan, Jastrzębski, Jastrzębski Krzysztof, Jastrzębski Maciej «Dworczyk», Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Mateusz, Jastrzębski Michał, Jastrzębski Paweł, Jastrzębski Szymon, Jastrzębski Fabian15 persons on 15 hearths
Fifteen persons, fifteen hearths — it agrees with „po 1 dymie” and with the card's own total (2+15+1+2+1 = 21 = „Razem – 21”). It is precisely this total that settles the dispute over the reworked digits: the figure beside this entry is written in black ink over something earlier and taken on its own could be read as either 15 or 16 — the card's own arithmetic requires 15, and fifteen forenames also give 15, so I read 15. The word „Jana” is gone over in black ink (with a short horizontal stroke above it): if it were taken as struck out, fourteen forenames would remain and the card's total would not close, so I treat this mark as a correction/reinforcement of the writing, not as a deletion. Note: in T89 on the same card „Jana” really is struck out — with a clear zigzag — and there it indeed does not count towards the total. The repetition marks („ „ „ „) in the right-hand margin refer back to „dymy wiejskie 2giej klasy” from entry A.
JastrzębskiIgnacy
T9015 · each 1B) cz. Adama; Franciszka; Ignacego; Ignacego syna Macieja; Jana; Jakubowej wdowy; Krzysztofa; Macieja Dworczyka; Marcina syna Pawła; Marcina syna Joachima; Mateusza; Michała; Pawła; Szymona i Fabiana – Jastrzębskich – po 1 dymie – 15 „ „ „ „;card 2)
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Adam, Jastrzębski Franciszek, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Jan, Jastrzębski, Jastrzębski Krzysztof, Jastrzębski Maciej «Dworczyk», Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Mateusz, Jastrzębski Michał, Jastrzębski Paweł, Jastrzębski Szymon, Jastrzębski Fabian15 persons on 15 hearths
Fifteen persons, fifteen hearths — it agrees with „po 1 dymie” and with the card's own total (2+15+1+2+1 = 21 = „Razem – 21”). It is precisely this total that settles the dispute over the reworked digits: the figure beside this entry is written in black ink over something earlier and taken on its own could be read as either 15 or 16 — the card's own arithmetic requires 15, and fifteen forenames also give 15, so I read 15. The word „Jana” is gone over in black ink (with a short horizontal stroke above it): if it were taken as struck out, fourteen forenames would remain and the card's total would not close, so I treat this mark as a correction/reinforcement of the writing, not as a deletion. Note: in T89 on the same card „Jana” really is struck out — with a clear zigzag — and there it indeed does not count towards the total. The repetition marks („ „ „ „) in the right-hand margin refer back to „dymy wiejskie 2giej klasy” from entry A.
the card adds „syna Macieja” — a distinction from the second Ignacy in the same entry
JastrzębskiJan
T9015 · each 1B) cz. Adama; Franciszka; Ignacego; Ignacego syna Macieja; Jana; Jakubowej wdowy; Krzysztofa; Macieja Dworczyka; Marcina syna Pawła; Marcina syna Joachima; Mateusza; Michała; Pawła; Szymona i Fabiana – Jastrzębskich – po 1 dymie – 15 „ „ „ „;card 2)
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Adam, Jastrzębski Franciszek, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski, Jastrzębski Krzysztof, Jastrzębski Maciej «Dworczyk», Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Mateusz, Jastrzębski Michał, Jastrzębski Paweł, Jastrzębski Szymon, Jastrzębski Fabian15 persons on 15 hearths
Fifteen persons, fifteen hearths — it agrees with „po 1 dymie” and with the card's own total (2+15+1+2+1 = 21 = „Razem – 21”). It is precisely this total that settles the dispute over the reworked digits: the figure beside this entry is written in black ink over something earlier and taken on its own could be read as either 15 or 16 — the card's own arithmetic requires 15, and fifteen forenames also give 15, so I read 15. The word „Jana” is gone over in black ink (with a short horizontal stroke above it): if it were taken as struck out, fourteen forenames would remain and the card's total would not close, so I treat this mark as a correction/reinforcement of the writing, not as a deletion. Note: in T89 on the same card „Jana” really is struck out — with a clear zigzag — and there it indeed does not count towards the total. The repetition marks („ „ „ „) in the right-hand margin refer back to „dymy wiejskie 2giej klasy” from entry A.
on the card „Jana” gone over later in black ink; the word remains legible and DOES COUNT towards the 15 hearths (see the entry's the note)
JastrzębskiKrzysztof
T9015 · each 1B) cz. Adama; Franciszka; Ignacego; Ignacego syna Macieja; Jana; Jakubowej wdowy; Krzysztofa; Macieja Dworczyka; Marcina syna Pawła; Marcina syna Joachima; Mateusza; Michała; Pawła; Szymona i Fabiana – Jastrzębskich – po 1 dymie – 15 „ „ „ „;card 2)
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Adam, Jastrzębski Franciszek, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Jan, Jastrzębski, Jastrzębski Maciej «Dworczyk», Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Mateusz, Jastrzębski Michał, Jastrzębski Paweł, Jastrzębski Szymon, Jastrzębski Fabian15 persons on 15 hearths
Fifteen persons, fifteen hearths — it agrees with „po 1 dymie” and with the card's own total (2+15+1+2+1 = 21 = „Razem – 21”). It is precisely this total that settles the dispute over the reworked digits: the figure beside this entry is written in black ink over something earlier and taken on its own could be read as either 15 or 16 — the card's own arithmetic requires 15, and fifteen forenames also give 15, so I read 15. The word „Jana” is gone over in black ink (with a short horizontal stroke above it): if it were taken as struck out, fourteen forenames would remain and the card's total would not close, so I treat this mark as a correction/reinforcement of the writing, not as a deletion. Note: in T89 on the same card „Jana” really is struck out — with a clear zigzag — and there it indeed does not count towards the total. The repetition marks („ „ „ „) in the right-hand margin refer back to „dymy wiejskie 2giej klasy” from entry A.
JastrzębskiMaciej«Dworczyk»
T9015 · each 1B) cz. Adama; Franciszka; Ignacego; Ignacego syna Macieja; Jana; Jakubowej wdowy; Krzysztofa; Macieja Dworczyka; Marcina syna Pawła; Marcina syna Joachima; Mateusza; Michała; Pawła; Szymona i Fabiana – Jastrzębskich – po 1 dymie – 15 „ „ „ „;card 2)
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Adam, Jastrzębski Franciszek, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Jan, Jastrzębski, Jastrzębski Krzysztof, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Mateusz, Jastrzębski Michał, Jastrzębski Paweł, Jastrzębski Szymon, Jastrzębski Fabian15 persons on 15 hearths
Fifteen persons, fifteen hearths — it agrees with „po 1 dymie” and with the card's own total (2+15+1+2+1 = 21 = „Razem – 21”). It is precisely this total that settles the dispute over the reworked digits: the figure beside this entry is written in black ink over something earlier and taken on its own could be read as either 15 or 16 — the card's own arithmetic requires 15, and fifteen forenames also give 15, so I read 15. The word „Jana” is gone over in black ink (with a short horizontal stroke above it): if it were taken as struck out, fourteen forenames would remain and the card's total would not close, so I treat this mark as a correction/reinforcement of the writing, not as a deletion. Note: in T89 on the same card „Jana” really is struck out — with a clear zigzag — and there it indeed does not count towards the total. The repetition marks („ „ „ „) in the right-hand margin refer back to „dymy wiejskie 2giej klasy” from entry A.
JastrzębskiMarcin
T9015 · each 1B) cz. Adama; Franciszka; Ignacego; Ignacego syna Macieja; Jana; Jakubowej wdowy; Krzysztofa; Macieja Dworczyka; Marcina syna Pawła; Marcina syna Joachima; Mateusza; Michała; Pawła; Szymona i Fabiana – Jastrzębskich – po 1 dymie – 15 „ „ „ „;card 2)
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Adam, Jastrzębski Franciszek, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Jan, Jastrzębski, Jastrzębski Krzysztof, Jastrzębski Maciej «Dworczyk», Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Mateusz, Jastrzębski Michał, Jastrzębski Paweł, Jastrzębski Szymon, Jastrzębski Fabian15 persons on 15 hearths
Fifteen persons, fifteen hearths — it agrees with „po 1 dymie” and with the card's own total (2+15+1+2+1 = 21 = „Razem – 21”). It is precisely this total that settles the dispute over the reworked digits: the figure beside this entry is written in black ink over something earlier and taken on its own could be read as either 15 or 16 — the card's own arithmetic requires 15, and fifteen forenames also give 15, so I read 15. The word „Jana” is gone over in black ink (with a short horizontal stroke above it): if it were taken as struck out, fourteen forenames would remain and the card's total would not close, so I treat this mark as a correction/reinforcement of the writing, not as a deletion. Note: in T89 on the same card „Jana” really is struck out — with a clear zigzag — and there it indeed does not count towards the total. The repetition marks („ „ „ „) in the right-hand margin refer back to „dymy wiejskie 2giej klasy” from entry A.
the card adds „syna Pawła”
JastrzębskiMarcin
T9015 · each 1B) cz. Adama; Franciszka; Ignacego; Ignacego syna Macieja; Jana; Jakubowej wdowy; Krzysztofa; Macieja Dworczyka; Marcina syna Pawła; Marcina syna Joachima; Mateusza; Michała; Pawła; Szymona i Fabiana – Jastrzębskich – po 1 dymie – 15 „ „ „ „;card 2)
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Adam, Jastrzębski Franciszek, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Jan, Jastrzębski, Jastrzębski Krzysztof, Jastrzębski Maciej «Dworczyk», Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Mateusz, Jastrzębski Michał, Jastrzębski Paweł, Jastrzębski Szymon, Jastrzębski Fabian15 persons on 15 hearths
Fifteen persons, fifteen hearths — it agrees with „po 1 dymie” and with the card's own total (2+15+1+2+1 = 21 = „Razem – 21”). It is precisely this total that settles the dispute over the reworked digits: the figure beside this entry is written in black ink over something earlier and taken on its own could be read as either 15 or 16 — the card's own arithmetic requires 15, and fifteen forenames also give 15, so I read 15. The word „Jana” is gone over in black ink (with a short horizontal stroke above it): if it were taken as struck out, fourteen forenames would remain and the card's total would not close, so I treat this mark as a correction/reinforcement of the writing, not as a deletion. Note: in T89 on the same card „Jana” really is struck out — with a clear zigzag — and there it indeed does not count towards the total. The repetition marks („ „ „ „) in the right-hand margin refer back to „dymy wiejskie 2giej klasy” from entry A.
the card adds „syna Joachima”
JastrzębskiMateusz
T9015 · each 1B) cz. Adama; Franciszka; Ignacego; Ignacego syna Macieja; Jana; Jakubowej wdowy; Krzysztofa; Macieja Dworczyka; Marcina syna Pawła; Marcina syna Joachima; Mateusza; Michała; Pawła; Szymona i Fabiana – Jastrzębskich – po 1 dymie – 15 „ „ „ „;card 2)
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Adam, Jastrzębski Franciszek, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Jan, Jastrzębski, Jastrzębski Krzysztof, Jastrzębski Maciej «Dworczyk», Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Michał, Jastrzębski Paweł, Jastrzębski Szymon, Jastrzębski Fabian15 persons on 15 hearths
Fifteen persons, fifteen hearths — it agrees with „po 1 dymie” and with the card's own total (2+15+1+2+1 = 21 = „Razem – 21”). It is precisely this total that settles the dispute over the reworked digits: the figure beside this entry is written in black ink over something earlier and taken on its own could be read as either 15 or 16 — the card's own arithmetic requires 15, and fifteen forenames also give 15, so I read 15. The word „Jana” is gone over in black ink (with a short horizontal stroke above it): if it were taken as struck out, fourteen forenames would remain and the card's total would not close, so I treat this mark as a correction/reinforcement of the writing, not as a deletion. Note: in T89 on the same card „Jana” really is struck out — with a clear zigzag — and there it indeed does not count towards the total. The repetition marks („ „ „ „) in the right-hand margin refer back to „dymy wiejskie 2giej klasy” from entry A.
JastrzębskiMichał
T9015 · each 1B) cz. Adama; Franciszka; Ignacego; Ignacego syna Macieja; Jana; Jakubowej wdowy; Krzysztofa; Macieja Dworczyka; Marcina syna Pawła; Marcina syna Joachima; Mateusza; Michała; Pawła; Szymona i Fabiana – Jastrzębskich – po 1 dymie – 15 „ „ „ „;card 2)
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Adam, Jastrzębski Franciszek, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Jan, Jastrzębski, Jastrzębski Krzysztof, Jastrzębski Maciej «Dworczyk», Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Mateusz, Jastrzębski Paweł, Jastrzębski Szymon, Jastrzębski Fabian15 persons on 15 hearths
Fifteen persons, fifteen hearths — it agrees with „po 1 dymie” and with the card's own total (2+15+1+2+1 = 21 = „Razem – 21”). It is precisely this total that settles the dispute over the reworked digits: the figure beside this entry is written in black ink over something earlier and taken on its own could be read as either 15 or 16 — the card's own arithmetic requires 15, and fifteen forenames also give 15, so I read 15. The word „Jana” is gone over in black ink (with a short horizontal stroke above it): if it were taken as struck out, fourteen forenames would remain and the card's total would not close, so I treat this mark as a correction/reinforcement of the writing, not as a deletion. Note: in T89 on the same card „Jana” really is struck out — with a clear zigzag — and there it indeed does not count towards the total. The repetition marks („ „ „ „) in the right-hand margin refer back to „dymy wiejskie 2giej klasy” from entry A.
JastrzębskiPaweł
T9015 · each 1B) cz. Adama; Franciszka; Ignacego; Ignacego syna Macieja; Jana; Jakubowej wdowy; Krzysztofa; Macieja Dworczyka; Marcina syna Pawła; Marcina syna Joachima; Mateusza; Michała; Pawła; Szymona i Fabiana – Jastrzębskich – po 1 dymie – 15 „ „ „ „;card 2)
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Adam, Jastrzębski Franciszek, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Jan, Jastrzębski, Jastrzębski Krzysztof, Jastrzębski Maciej «Dworczyk», Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Mateusz, Jastrzębski Michał, Jastrzębski Szymon, Jastrzębski Fabian15 persons on 15 hearths
Fifteen persons, fifteen hearths — it agrees with „po 1 dymie” and with the card's own total (2+15+1+2+1 = 21 = „Razem – 21”). It is precisely this total that settles the dispute over the reworked digits: the figure beside this entry is written in black ink over something earlier and taken on its own could be read as either 15 or 16 — the card's own arithmetic requires 15, and fifteen forenames also give 15, so I read 15. The word „Jana” is gone over in black ink (with a short horizontal stroke above it): if it were taken as struck out, fourteen forenames would remain and the card's total would not close, so I treat this mark as a correction/reinforcement of the writing, not as a deletion. Note: in T89 on the same card „Jana” really is struck out — with a clear zigzag — and there it indeed does not count towards the total. The repetition marks („ „ „ „) in the right-hand margin refer back to „dymy wiejskie 2giej klasy” from entry A.
JastrzębskiSzymon
T9015 · each 1B) cz. Adama; Franciszka; Ignacego; Ignacego syna Macieja; Jana; Jakubowej wdowy; Krzysztofa; Macieja Dworczyka; Marcina syna Pawła; Marcina syna Joachima; Mateusza; Michała; Pawła; Szymona i Fabiana – Jastrzębskich – po 1 dymie – 15 „ „ „ „;card 2)
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Adam, Jastrzębski Franciszek, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Jan, Jastrzębski, Jastrzębski Krzysztof, Jastrzębski Maciej «Dworczyk», Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Mateusz, Jastrzębski Michał, Jastrzębski Paweł, Jastrzębski Fabian15 persons on 15 hearths
Fifteen persons, fifteen hearths — it agrees with „po 1 dymie” and with the card's own total (2+15+1+2+1 = 21 = „Razem – 21”). It is precisely this total that settles the dispute over the reworked digits: the figure beside this entry is written in black ink over something earlier and taken on its own could be read as either 15 or 16 — the card's own arithmetic requires 15, and fifteen forenames also give 15, so I read 15. The word „Jana” is gone over in black ink (with a short horizontal stroke above it): if it were taken as struck out, fourteen forenames would remain and the card's total would not close, so I treat this mark as a correction/reinforcement of the writing, not as a deletion. Note: in T89 on the same card „Jana” really is struck out — with a clear zigzag — and there it indeed does not count towards the total. The repetition marks („ „ „ „) in the right-hand margin refer back to „dymy wiejskie 2giej klasy” from entry A.
KowieskiBartłomiej
T901 hearthC) cz. Bartłomieja Kowieskiego ————— 1 „ „ „ „;card 2)
Between the surname and the figure a long horizontal filler stroke. The figure „1” is underlined.
BorkowskiFranciszek
T902 · each 1D) cz. Franciszka i Pawła – Borkowskich – po 1 dymie — 2 „ „ „ „;card 2)
the same entry also names: Borkowski Paweł2 persons on 2 hearths
Two persons, two hearths — it agrees with „po 1 dymie”.
BorkowskiPaweł
T902 · each 1D) cz. Franciszka i Pawła – Borkowskich – po 1 dymie — 2 „ „ „ „;card 2)
the same entry also names: Borkowski Franciszek2 persons on 2 hearths
Two persons, two hearths — it agrees with „po 1 dymie”.
IzdebskiJan
T901 hearthE) cz. Jana Izdebskiego 1 dymcard 2)
The whole entry is added in black ink, in a heavier hand, below the stroke closing entries A–D — yet it still enters into the card's own total („Razem – 21” requires this one hearth: 2+15+1+2+1 = 21). The total „Razem – 21 dymów wiejskich 2giej klasy;–” stands on the right, in the same line; the figure 21 is underlined twice.
1794 T94Hearth tax register 1794
BorkowskaElżbieta
T942 · share of 1cz. [wyraz skreślony] Jastrzębskiego Tomasza z częścią po Elżbiecie Borkowskiej; 2 d.;card 3)
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Tomasz2 persons on 2 hearths
At the start of the line, right after „cz.”, stands a word STRUCK OUT by a double horizontal stroke; beneath the striking-out three letters are visible, which I read as the beginning of a forename — „Tom…” [reading uncertain] — that is, the writer began with the forename, thought better of it, and wrote the surname first, the forename only after it. The figure „2” with an underline. The same pair of holdings as in T90 entry A on card 2), there too 2 hearths. The phrase „po Elżbiecie Borkowskiej” says that the holding passed after her to Tomasz Jastrzębski, but the card does not call her deceased (there is no „sukces.”, „niegdy” nor „ś.p.”), so no death marker is put — just as with „cz. Antoniego po Piotrze Lipińskim” in Ługi Wielkie. Something else is worth noting: in T89 and T₀89 (1789) Elżbieta Borkowska still holds the holding herself, while in T90 (1790) and T94 (1794) the holding is already „po niej”.
A WOMAN with a forename of her own; the surname in the feminine form, as on the card. the mark for a deceased person = true, because the holding is „PO Elżbiecie” (left by Elżbieta), and not „jej” (hers). The record agrees with T90 on card 2).
JastrzębskiTomasz
T942 · share of 1cz. [wyraz skreślony] Jastrzębskiego Tomasza z częścią po Elżbiecie Borkowskiej; 2 d.;card 3)
the same entry also names: Borkowska Elżbieta2 persons on 2 hearths
At the start of the line, right after „cz.”, stands a word STRUCK OUT by a double horizontal stroke; beneath the striking-out three letters are visible, which I read as the beginning of a forename — „Tom…” [reading uncertain] — that is, the writer began with the forename, thought better of it, and wrote the surname first, the forename only after it. The figure „2” with an underline. The same pair of holdings as in T90 entry A on card 2), there too 2 hearths. The phrase „po Elżbiecie Borkowskiej” says that the holding passed after her to Tomasz Jastrzębski, but the card does not call her deceased (there is no „sukces.”, „niegdy” nor „ś.p.”), so no death marker is put — just as with „cz. Antoniego po Piotrze Lipińskim” in Ługi Wielkie. Something else is worth noting: in T89 and T₀89 (1789) Elżbieta Borkowska still holds the holding herself, while in T90 (1790) and T94 (1794) the holding is already „po niej”.
Jastrzębski„wdowy Jakubowej”
T9415 · each 1widowcz. Kr.(zysztofa), Jana, Marcina po Pawle, Mateusza, Michała, Szy–mona, Ignacego, Franciszka, Marcina Dworczyka, Marcina po Joachimie, Fabijana, wdowy Jakubowej, Ignacego po Macieju, Pawła, Adama, Jastrzębskich (po 1 dymie) = 15 d.;card 3)
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Krzysztof, Jastrzębski Jan, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Mateusz, Jastrzębski Michał, Jastrzębski Szymon, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Franciszek, Jastrzębski Marcin «Dworczyk», Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Fabijan, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Paweł, Jastrzębski Adam15 persons on 15 hearths
Fifteen persons, fifteen hearths — this agrees with „(po 1 dymie)” and with the card's own total (2+15+2+1+1 = 21 = „Razem 21 dymów”). The set of persons is, down to the one person, the same as in T90 entry B on card 2), only in a different order and with three differences in the wording: „Marcina Dworczyka” instead of „Macieja Dworczyka”, „Fabijana” instead of „Fabiana”, „wdowy Jakubowej” instead of „Jakubowej wdowy”. None of the entries here is corrected or struck out — this card is clean, and it is this card that confirms that on card 2) in T90 the number of hearths is 15, and that the „Jana” crossed through in black there does count.
A WOMAN. The card gives no forename of her own, only the husband-derived form — recorded literally in the recorded form of the name, the given name empty. The word order is the reverse of T90 on card 2) („Jakubowej wdowy”), here „wdowy Jakubowej”; I record the order of this card. The surname from the collective member „Jastrzębskich”.
JastrzębskiAdam
T9415 · each 1cz. Kr.(zysztofa), Jana, Marcina po Pawle, Mateusza, Michała, Szy–mona, Ignacego, Franciszka, Marcina Dworczyka, Marcina po Joachimie, Fabijana, wdowy Jakubowej, Ignacego po Macieju, Pawła, Adama, Jastrzębskich (po 1 dymie) = 15 d.;card 3)
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Krzysztof, Jastrzębski Jan, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Mateusz, Jastrzębski Michał, Jastrzębski Szymon, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Franciszek, Jastrzębski Marcin «Dworczyk», Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Fabijan, Jastrzębski, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Paweł15 persons on 15 hearths
Fifteen persons, fifteen hearths — this agrees with „(po 1 dymie)” and with the card's own total (2+15+2+1+1 = 21 = „Razem 21 dymów”). The set of persons is, down to the one person, the same as in T90 entry B on card 2), only in a different order and with three differences in the wording: „Marcina Dworczyka” instead of „Macieja Dworczyka”, „Fabijana” instead of „Fabiana”, „wdowy Jakubowej” instead of „Jakubowej wdowy”. None of the entries here is corrected or struck out — this card is clean, and it is this card that confirms that on card 2) in T90 the number of hearths is 15, and that the „Jana” crossed through in black there does count.
JastrzębskiFabijan
T9415 · each 1cz. Kr.(zysztofa), Jana, Marcina po Pawle, Mateusza, Michała, Szy–mona, Ignacego, Franciszka, Marcina Dworczyka, Marcina po Joachimie, Fabijana, wdowy Jakubowej, Ignacego po Macieju, Pawła, Adama, Jastrzębskich (po 1 dymie) = 15 d.;card 3)
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Krzysztof, Jastrzębski Jan, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Mateusz, Jastrzębski Michał, Jastrzębski Szymon, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Franciszek, Jastrzębski Marcin «Dworczyk», Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Paweł, Jastrzębski Adam15 persons on 15 hearths
Fifteen persons, fifteen hearths — this agrees with „(po 1 dymie)” and with the card's own total (2+15+2+1+1 = 21 = „Razem 21 dymów”). The set of persons is, down to the one person, the same as in T90 entry B on card 2), only in a different order and with three differences in the wording: „Marcina Dworczyka” instead of „Macieja Dworczyka”, „Fabijana” instead of „Fabiana”, „wdowy Jakubowej” instead of „Jakubowej wdowy”. None of the entries here is corrected or struck out — this card is clean, and it is this card that confirms that on card 2) in T90 the number of hearths is 15, and that the „Jana” crossed through in black there does count.
here the record is „Fabijana”, with „-ij-”; in T90 on card 2) „Fabiana”. I record the form from this card.
JastrzębskiFranciszek
T9415 · each 1cz. Kr.(zysztofa), Jana, Marcina po Pawle, Mateusza, Michała, Szy–mona, Ignacego, Franciszka, Marcina Dworczyka, Marcina po Joachimie, Fabijana, wdowy Jakubowej, Ignacego po Macieju, Pawła, Adama, Jastrzębskich (po 1 dymie) = 15 d.;card 3)
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Krzysztof, Jastrzębski Jan, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Mateusz, Jastrzębski Michał, Jastrzębski Szymon, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Marcin «Dworczyk», Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Fabijan, Jastrzębski, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Paweł, Jastrzębski Adam15 persons on 15 hearths
Fifteen persons, fifteen hearths — this agrees with „(po 1 dymie)” and with the card's own total (2+15+2+1+1 = 21 = „Razem 21 dymów”). The set of persons is, down to the one person, the same as in T90 entry B on card 2), only in a different order and with three differences in the wording: „Marcina Dworczyka” instead of „Macieja Dworczyka”, „Fabijana” instead of „Fabiana”, „wdowy Jakubowej” instead of „Jakubowej wdowy”. None of the entries here is corrected or struck out — this card is clean, and it is this card that confirms that on card 2) in T90 the number of hearths is 15, and that the „Jana” crossed through in black there does count.
JastrzębskiIgnacy
T9415 · each 1cz. Kr.(zysztofa), Jana, Marcina po Pawle, Mateusza, Michała, Szy–mona, Ignacego, Franciszka, Marcina Dworczyka, Marcina po Joachimie, Fabijana, wdowy Jakubowej, Ignacego po Macieju, Pawła, Adama, Jastrzębskich (po 1 dymie) = 15 d.;card 3)
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Krzysztof, Jastrzębski Jan, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Mateusz, Jastrzębski Michał, Jastrzębski Szymon, Jastrzębski Franciszek, Jastrzębski Marcin «Dworczyk», Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Fabijan, Jastrzębski, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Paweł, Jastrzębski Adam15 persons on 15 hearths
Fifteen persons, fifteen hearths — this agrees with „(po 1 dymie)” and with the card's own total (2+15+2+1+1 = 21 = „Razem 21 dymów”). The set of persons is, down to the one person, the same as in T90 entry B on card 2), only in a different order and with three differences in the wording: „Marcina Dworczyka” instead of „Macieja Dworczyka”, „Fabijana” instead of „Fabiana”, „wdowy Jakubowej” instead of „Jakubowej wdowy”. None of the entries here is corrected or struck out — this card is clean, and it is this card that confirms that on card 2) in T90 the number of hearths is 15, and that the „Jana” crossed through in black there does count.
JastrzębskiIgnacy
T9415 · each 1cz. Kr.(zysztofa), Jana, Marcina po Pawle, Mateusza, Michała, Szy–mona, Ignacego, Franciszka, Marcina Dworczyka, Marcina po Joachimie, Fabijana, wdowy Jakubowej, Ignacego po Macieju, Pawła, Adama, Jastrzębskich (po 1 dymie) = 15 d.;card 3)
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Krzysztof, Jastrzębski Jan, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Mateusz, Jastrzębski Michał, Jastrzębski Szymon, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Franciszek, Jastrzębski Marcin «Dworczyk», Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Fabijan, Jastrzębski, Jastrzębski Paweł, Jastrzębski Adam15 persons on 15 hearths
Fifteen persons, fifteen hearths — this agrees with „(po 1 dymie)” and with the card's own total (2+15+2+1+1 = 21 = „Razem 21 dymów”). The set of persons is, down to the one person, the same as in T90 entry B on card 2), only in a different order and with three differences in the wording: „Marcina Dworczyka” instead of „Macieja Dworczyka”, „Fabijana” instead of „Fabiana”, „wdowy Jakubowej” instead of „Jakubowej wdowy”. None of the entries here is corrected or struck out — this card is clean, and it is this card that confirms that on card 2) in T90 the number of hearths is 15, and that the „Jana” crossed through in black there does count.
the card adds „po Macieju” (in T90 on card 2): „Ignacego syna Macieja”)
JastrzębskiJan
T9415 · each 1cz. Kr.(zysztofa), Jana, Marcina po Pawle, Mateusza, Michała, Szy–mona, Ignacego, Franciszka, Marcina Dworczyka, Marcina po Joachimie, Fabijana, wdowy Jakubowej, Ignacego po Macieju, Pawła, Adama, Jastrzębskich (po 1 dymie) = 15 d.;card 3)
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Krzysztof, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Mateusz, Jastrzębski Michał, Jastrzębski Szymon, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Franciszek, Jastrzębski Marcin «Dworczyk», Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Fabijan, Jastrzębski, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Paweł, Jastrzębski Adam15 persons on 15 hearths
Fifteen persons, fifteen hearths — this agrees with „(po 1 dymie)” and with the card's own total (2+15+2+1+1 = 21 = „Razem 21 dymów”). The set of persons is, down to the one person, the same as in T90 entry B on card 2), only in a different order and with three differences in the wording: „Marcina Dworczyka” instead of „Macieja Dworczyka”, „Fabijana” instead of „Fabiana”, „wdowy Jakubowej” instead of „Jakubowej wdowy”. None of the entries here is corrected or struck out — this card is clean, and it is this card that confirms that on card 2) in T90 the number of hearths is 15, and that the „Jana” crossed through in black there does count.
JastrzębskiKrzysztof
T9415 · each 1cz. Kr.(zysztofa), Jana, Marcina po Pawle, Mateusza, Michała, Szy–mona, Ignacego, Franciszka, Marcina Dworczyka, Marcina po Joachimie, Fabijana, wdowy Jakubowej, Ignacego po Macieju, Pawła, Adama, Jastrzębskich (po 1 dymie) = 15 d.;card 3)
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Jan, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Mateusz, Jastrzębski Michał, Jastrzębski Szymon, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Franciszek, Jastrzębski Marcin «Dworczyk», Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Fabijan, Jastrzębski, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Paweł, Jastrzębski Adam15 persons on 15 hearths
Fifteen persons, fifteen hearths — this agrees with „(po 1 dymie)” and with the card's own total (2+15+2+1+1 = 21 = „Razem 21 dymów”). The set of persons is, down to the one person, the same as in T90 entry B on card 2), only in a different order and with three differences in the wording: „Marcina Dworczyka” instead of „Macieja Dworczyka”, „Fabijana” instead of „Fabiana”, „wdowy Jakubowej” instead of „Jakubowej wdowy”. None of the entries here is corrected or struck out — this card is clean, and it is this card that confirms that on card 2) in T90 the number of hearths is 15, and that the „Jana” crossed through in black there does count.
on the card an abbreviation with its expansion in the author's own hand: „Kr.(zysztofa)” — the expansion comes from the card, not from me
JastrzębskiMarcin
T9415 · each 1cz. Kr.(zysztofa), Jana, Marcina po Pawle, Mateusza, Michała, Szy–mona, Ignacego, Franciszka, Marcina Dworczyka, Marcina po Joachimie, Fabijana, wdowy Jakubowej, Ignacego po Macieju, Pawła, Adama, Jastrzębskich (po 1 dymie) = 15 d.;card 3)
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Krzysztof, Jastrzębski Jan, Jastrzębski Mateusz, Jastrzębski Michał, Jastrzębski Szymon, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Franciszek, Jastrzębski Marcin «Dworczyk», Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Fabijan, Jastrzębski, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Paweł, Jastrzębski Adam15 persons on 15 hearths
Fifteen persons, fifteen hearths — this agrees with „(po 1 dymie)” and with the card's own total (2+15+2+1+1 = 21 = „Razem 21 dymów”). The set of persons is, down to the one person, the same as in T90 entry B on card 2), only in a different order and with three differences in the wording: „Marcina Dworczyka” instead of „Macieja Dworczyka”, „Fabijana” instead of „Fabiana”, „wdowy Jakubowej” instead of „Jakubowej wdowy”. None of the entries here is corrected or struck out — this card is clean, and it is this card that confirms that on card 2) in T90 the number of hearths is 15, and that the „Jana” crossed through in black there does count.
the card adds „po Pawle”
JastrzębskiMarcin
T9415 · each 1cz. Kr.(zysztofa), Jana, Marcina po Pawle, Mateusza, Michała, Szy–mona, Ignacego, Franciszka, Marcina Dworczyka, Marcina po Joachimie, Fabijana, wdowy Jakubowej, Ignacego po Macieju, Pawła, Adama, Jastrzębskich (po 1 dymie) = 15 d.;card 3)
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Krzysztof, Jastrzębski Jan, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Mateusz, Jastrzębski Michał, Jastrzębski Szymon, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Franciszek, Jastrzębski Marcin «Dworczyk», Jastrzębski Fabijan, Jastrzębski, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Paweł, Jastrzębski Adam15 persons on 15 hearths
Fifteen persons, fifteen hearths — this agrees with „(po 1 dymie)” and with the card's own total (2+15+2+1+1 = 21 = „Razem 21 dymów”). The set of persons is, down to the one person, the same as in T90 entry B on card 2), only in a different order and with three differences in the wording: „Marcina Dworczyka” instead of „Macieja Dworczyka”, „Fabijana” instead of „Fabiana”, „wdowy Jakubowej” instead of „Jakubowej wdowy”. None of the entries here is corrected or struck out — this card is clean, and it is this card that confirms that on card 2) in T90 the number of hearths is 15, and that the „Jana” crossed through in black there does count.
the card adds „po Joachimie” (in T89 on card 2) the same phrase reads „po Joachymie”)
JastrzębskiMarcin«Dworczyk»
T9415 · each 1cz. Kr.(zysztofa), Jana, Marcina po Pawle, Mateusza, Michała, Szy–mona, Ignacego, Franciszka, Marcina Dworczyka, Marcina po Joachimie, Fabijana, wdowy Jakubowej, Ignacego po Macieju, Pawła, Adama, Jastrzębskich (po 1 dymie) = 15 d.;card 3)
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Krzysztof, Jastrzębski Jan, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Mateusz, Jastrzębski Michał, Jastrzębski Szymon, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Franciszek, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Fabijan, Jastrzębski, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Paweł, Jastrzębski Adam15 persons on 15 hearths
Fifteen persons, fifteen hearths — this agrees with „(po 1 dymie)” and with the card's own total (2+15+2+1+1 = 21 = „Razem 21 dymów”). The set of persons is, down to the one person, the same as in T90 entry B on card 2), only in a different order and with three differences in the wording: „Marcina Dworczyka” instead of „Macieja Dworczyka”, „Fabijana” instead of „Fabiana”, „wdowy Jakubowej” instead of „Jakubowej wdowy”. None of the entries here is corrected or struck out — this card is clean, and it is this card that confirms that on card 2) in T90 the number of hearths is 15, and that the „Jana” crossed through in black there does count.
A DISCREPANCY BETWEEN THE YEARS, NOT AN ERROR OF READING: here the card writes „Marcina Dworczyka”, while T90 and T89 (card 2) have Maciej beside the same byname („Macieja Dworczyka”, „Macieja-Dworczyka”). I have checked the word under magnification and „Marcina” stands in it — the same shape as in „Marcina po Joachimie” two words further on in the same line. I record what is on the card; I make no reconciliation, because the merging of persons belongs to the stage of the index. Reported in the report.
JastrzębskiMateusz
T9415 · each 1cz. Kr.(zysztofa), Jana, Marcina po Pawle, Mateusza, Michała, Szy–mona, Ignacego, Franciszka, Marcina Dworczyka, Marcina po Joachimie, Fabijana, wdowy Jakubowej, Ignacego po Macieju, Pawła, Adama, Jastrzębskich (po 1 dymie) = 15 d.;card 3)
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Krzysztof, Jastrzębski Jan, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Michał, Jastrzębski Szymon, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Franciszek, Jastrzębski Marcin «Dworczyk», Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Fabijan, Jastrzębski, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Paweł, Jastrzębski Adam15 persons on 15 hearths
Fifteen persons, fifteen hearths — this agrees with „(po 1 dymie)” and with the card's own total (2+15+2+1+1 = 21 = „Razem 21 dymów”). The set of persons is, down to the one person, the same as in T90 entry B on card 2), only in a different order and with three differences in the wording: „Marcina Dworczyka” instead of „Macieja Dworczyka”, „Fabijana” instead of „Fabiana”, „wdowy Jakubowej” instead of „Jakubowej wdowy”. None of the entries here is corrected or struck out — this card is clean, and it is this card that confirms that on card 2) in T90 the number of hearths is 15, and that the „Jana” crossed through in black there does count.
JastrzębskiMichał
T9415 · each 1cz. Kr.(zysztofa), Jana, Marcina po Pawle, Mateusza, Michała, Szy–mona, Ignacego, Franciszka, Marcina Dworczyka, Marcina po Joachimie, Fabijana, wdowy Jakubowej, Ignacego po Macieju, Pawła, Adama, Jastrzębskich (po 1 dymie) = 15 d.;card 3)
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Krzysztof, Jastrzębski Jan, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Mateusz, Jastrzębski Szymon, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Franciszek, Jastrzębski Marcin «Dworczyk», Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Fabijan, Jastrzębski, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Paweł, Jastrzębski Adam15 persons on 15 hearths
Fifteen persons, fifteen hearths — this agrees with „(po 1 dymie)” and with the card's own total (2+15+2+1+1 = 21 = „Razem 21 dymów”). The set of persons is, down to the one person, the same as in T90 entry B on card 2), only in a different order and with three differences in the wording: „Marcina Dworczyka” instead of „Macieja Dworczyka”, „Fabijana” instead of „Fabiana”, „wdowy Jakubowej” instead of „Jakubowej wdowy”. None of the entries here is corrected or struck out — this card is clean, and it is this card that confirms that on card 2) in T90 the number of hearths is 15, and that the „Jana” crossed through in black there does count.
JastrzębskiPaweł
T9415 · each 1cz. Kr.(zysztofa), Jana, Marcina po Pawle, Mateusza, Michała, Szy–mona, Ignacego, Franciszka, Marcina Dworczyka, Marcina po Joachimie, Fabijana, wdowy Jakubowej, Ignacego po Macieju, Pawła, Adama, Jastrzębskich (po 1 dymie) = 15 d.;card 3)
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Krzysztof, Jastrzębski Jan, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Mateusz, Jastrzębski Michał, Jastrzębski Szymon, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Franciszek, Jastrzębski Marcin «Dworczyk», Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Fabijan, Jastrzębski, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Adam15 persons on 15 hearths
Fifteen persons, fifteen hearths — this agrees with „(po 1 dymie)” and with the card's own total (2+15+2+1+1 = 21 = „Razem 21 dymów”). The set of persons is, down to the one person, the same as in T90 entry B on card 2), only in a different order and with three differences in the wording: „Marcina Dworczyka” instead of „Macieja Dworczyka”, „Fabijana” instead of „Fabiana”, „wdowy Jakubowej” instead of „Jakubowej wdowy”. None of the entries here is corrected or struck out — this card is clean, and it is this card that confirms that on card 2) in T90 the number of hearths is 15, and that the „Jana” crossed through in black there does count.
JastrzębskiSzymon
T9415 · each 1cz. Kr.(zysztofa), Jana, Marcina po Pawle, Mateusza, Michała, Szy–mona, Ignacego, Franciszka, Marcina Dworczyka, Marcina po Joachimie, Fabijana, wdowy Jakubowej, Ignacego po Macieju, Pawła, Adama, Jastrzębskich (po 1 dymie) = 15 d.;card 3)
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Krzysztof, Jastrzębski Jan, Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Mateusz, Jastrzębski Michał, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Franciszek, Jastrzębski Marcin «Dworczyk», Jastrzębski Marcin, Jastrzębski Fabijan, Jastrzębski, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Jastrzębski Paweł, Jastrzębski Adam15 persons on 15 hearths
Fifteen persons, fifteen hearths — this agrees with „(po 1 dymie)” and with the card's own total (2+15+2+1+1 = 21 = „Razem 21 dymów”). The set of persons is, down to the one person, the same as in T90 entry B on card 2), only in a different order and with three differences in the wording: „Marcina Dworczyka” instead of „Macieja Dworczyka”, „Fabijana” instead of „Fabiana”, „wdowy Jakubowej” instead of „Jakubowej wdowy”. None of the entries here is corrected or struck out — this card is clean, and it is this card that confirms that on card 2) in T90 the number of hearths is 15, and that the „Jana” crossed through in black there does count.
the forename carried over the end of the line: „Szy-” / „mona”
BorkowskiFranciszek
T942 · each 1cz. Pawła, Franciszka, Borkowskich (po 1 dymie) = 2 d.;card 3)
the same entry also names: Borkowski Paweł2 persons on 2 hearths
Two persons, two hearths. A note on the year: in T89 on card 2) (the year 1789) there are THREE Borkowskis with 3 hearths — Elżbieta, Franciszek, Alexander; here, in T94, Elżbieta is no longer present (her holding has passed to Tomasz Jastrzębski, entry 1) and Alexander is likewise absent, but Paweł is present instead. I do not reconcile the changes — I record each year separately.
BorkowskiPaweł
T942 · each 1cz. Pawła, Franciszka, Borkowskich (po 1 dymie) = 2 d.;card 3)
the same entry also names: Borkowski Franciszek2 persons on 2 hearths
Two persons, two hearths. A note on the year: in T89 on card 2) (the year 1789) there are THREE Borkowskis with 3 hearths — Elżbieta, Franciszek, Alexander; here, in T94, Elżbieta is no longer present (her holding has passed to Tomasz Jastrzębski, entry 1) and Alexander is likewise absent, but Paweł is present instead. I do not reconcile the changes — I record each year separately.
IzdebskiJan
T941 hearthcz. Jana Izdebskiego 1 d.;card 3)
KowieskiBartłomiej
T941 hearthcz. Bartłomieja Kowieskiego 1 d.;card 3)
After this entry the card closes the extract with a thick cross stroke and gives its own total: „Razem 21 dymów;”, the figure 21 doubly underlined.
