Home › Castle court records / Old sources › The hearth-tax registers 1775–1794 › Role
Hearth Tax Registers of the Łuków Land 1775–1794
Role
Parish of Łuków, łukowski county.
Dear reader, remember that this is an AI study, that it may contain errors; treat it as indicative and verify it for yourself.
Offices: Mysłowski Urban (deputy palatine of the Łuków Land (podwojewodzi ziemi łukowskiej) · deputy palatine of Łuków (podwojewodzi łukowski)
Propination, inns, breweries: Mysłowski Urban (propination)
More than five hearths in one hand: Mysłowski Urban (9); Szkrzyszowski (6)
Extracts from outside the registers
Records under sigla which the card index does not expand. They give no hearths, so they enter no total.
note: A siglum from outside the list of the eight (the map of Perthées) — it does not enter the reckoning of hearths. The line gives the name of the village alone, in the form „Rogale”, different from the „Role” of the heading and from the „Rogala” of T75. The reading is certain.
note: A siglum from outside the list of the eight (the map of Heldensfeld) — it does not enter the reckoning of hearths. The name of the village alone: „Role”. The reading is certain.
note: A siglum from outside the list of the eight (a topographical map) — it does not enter the reckoning of hearths. The name of the village alone: „Role”. The reading is certain.
spellings on the cards: Role, Rogala, Rogale
district of łukowski · parish of Łuków · cards 1), 2), 3), 4), 5), 6), 7), 8), 9), 10), 11)
a noble village — the nobility hold their own holdings, and the more considerable one belongs to Urban Mystowski, deputy palatine of Łuków (podwojewodzi łukowski) [O83 (IX)]
| Year | Source | Entries | Hearths |
|---|---|---|---|
| T75 | Hearth tax register 1775 | 19 | 65 |
| T89 | Hearth tax register 1789 | 15 | 54 |
| T90 | Hearth tax register 1790 | 15 | 55 |
| T94 | Hearth tax register 1794 | 16 | 55 |
Caveats on the years' registers (7)
What the compiler noted beside the entry itself, and what the table above does not show:
- T75 — The 1775 register runs across THREE cards and is one single extract; it gives a total of its own only on the last of them. The beginning of the 1775 register on card 1) (card 1), entries 1-4; the heading „T75 - Rogala.” on strip `c`. The continuation on cards 2) and 688. The continuation of the 1775 register on card 2) (card 2), entries 5-13; the heading „T75: Rogala c.d.” on strip `b`. The total of the entries of this card: 4+3+7+2+3+3+1+2+2 = 27. The end of the 1775 register on card 3) (card 3), entries 14-19; the heading „T75 - Rogala. c.d.” on strip `b`. The card closes the extract with a total of its own „Razem dymów 65” (doubly underlined), entered in the total from the card at this, the last card of the list. THE ARITHMETICAL CHECK COMES OUT: card 1 gives 27, card 2 gives 27, card 3 gives 11 — together 65, exactly as many as the card gives. All nineteen figures of hearths are thus confirmed by the reckoning.
- T89 — The 1789 register. Three cards: card 7) (entries 1-4, a card without a total), card 8) (the end of entry 4 and entries 5-12, the heading „c.d. T89”), card 9) (entries 13-15 and the total „Razem 54 dymy zob. T89 pod Sulej[owem]”). Cards 8) and 694 lie upside down in the card index — read after turning the card round. The itemised buildings („dwór, brow., karcz., chat. …”) occur ONLY in entry 1 and are there so densely corrected and struck out that I do not set up a the breakdown of buildings field — the details in the the note of that entry. The addition beside the total — „zob. T89 pod Sulej[owem]” — is a cross-reference to another village/another card of the card index [the expansion of the name uncertain].
- T₀89 — A list of possessors of holdings of 1789 — without hearths (the hearths figure null throughout). It begins at the very foot of card 9) (card 9), runs through the whole of card 10) (card 10) and ends on card 11) (card 11) with entry 29. Entries 1–2 are without the addition about the sowing; from entry 3 to 29 all have the annotation „nie wysiewa 10 korcy”, on card 10 repeated by the word „podobniż”/„podobnież” beside each line separately, and on card 11 replaced by a single brace „nie wysiewają 10 korcy” covering entries 17–29.
- T90 — The 1790 register. It begins in the lower quarter of card 3) (entries 1-2), runs through the whole of card 4) (entries 3-7, with the heading „T90 - c.d.”) and ends on card 5) (entries 14-21) with the total „Razem dymów 55”. THE NUMBERING OF THE ENTRIES JUMPS from 7) to 14): entries 8-13 are not in the card index, and this is no failure of reading — the total of the entries actually written down gives exactly 55, the figure the card itself gives. The markers /pł. of./, /n. pł. of./ are transcribed literally; where they stand after a collective surname („… Rolów /n. pł. of./”), they refer to the whole group and I do not set them out for the individual persons — I record them in the text of the extract and in the the note of the entry.
- T94 — The extract begins in the lower part of card 5) (card 5) and ends on card 6) (card 6) with the total „Razem – 55 dymów”. The total of the entries written down below gives exactly 55.
- S87 — One line on strip `b` of card 1).
- V48 — It stands on strip `b` of card 1), on the right-hand side, in the same strip as S87.
The card-index entries
Every extract for this locality in the wording of the cards, year by year. One block is one occurrence: this person, in this year. At a collective item the same card text stands beside every person named — because the card names them together and they must not be separated. The hearths given at a collective item are an equal division among those named, not a reading.
1775 T75Hearth tax register 1775
The card gives no forenames — the plural form of the surname alone. The writing of the card „Szkrzyszowskich”; the same family returns in entry 13 as „Szkryszowskiego”, and on card 8 (T89, a colleague's extract) as „Skrzyszewskich”. The standard form of the neighbourhood is Skrzyszewski — the unification I leave to the owner, I record what stands on the card.
the same entry also names: Kornicki Józef, Hadrik Jan, Rola Franciszek, Hadrik Michał, Bojanek Józef, Kacprzyk Franciszek, Kacprzyk Jan, Kacprzyk Piotr, Krupczyk Andrzej, Krupczyk Maciej, Żakowicz Paweł, Rola Adam †, Żakowicz Antoni, Rola Wojciech †, Rola Jakób †16 persons on 16 hearths
FOR THE OWNER'S DECISION. A collective entry closed by the surname „— Rolów”, underlined with a wavy stroke exactly as collective surnames are underlined in this register („Nurzyńskich”, „Borkowskich”, „Sulejów”, „Radomyskich”). By the pattern of a collective entry the surname of all sixteen would therefore be ROLA, and the second elements („Kornickiego”, „Hadrika”, „Kacprzyka”, „Krupczyka”, „Żakowicza”, „Bojanka”) would be BYNAMES. I have entered it otherwise — to each his own second element as a surname, and the surname „Rola” only to the four persons whom the card leaves without a second element — because Kornicki is a surname attested in the neighbourhood, and bynames the card index nowhere else uses in this village. The resolution (surnames or bynames) requires the owner's decision; the text itself is entered literally. THE NUMBER OF PERSONS: sixteen records, sixteen hearths („po 1 dymie”), but seventeen persons, because „Franciszka z bratem” is two persons on one hearth. At „Andrzeja Krupczyka” and „Macieja Krupczyka” the ink is corrected (the surnames written one after the other), but both forenames are legible and both are needed for the sixteen hearths to come out. A WOMAN: „Piotrowej Bojakowej” — a form derived from the husband's name, the card gives no forename of her own; the surname is written in the feminine form, as it stands. The second element [reading uncertain] — it may be „Bojankowej”, because two lines below stands „Józefa Bojanka”.
the same entry also names: Kornicki Józef, Hadrik Jan, Bojakowa, Rola Franciszek, Hadrik Michał, Kacprzyk Franciszek, Kacprzyk Jan, Kacprzyk Piotr, Krupczyk Andrzej, Krupczyk Maciej, Żakowicz Paweł, Rola Adam †, Żakowicz Antoni, Rola Wojciech †, Rola Jakób †16 persons on 16 hearths
FOR THE OWNER'S DECISION. A collective entry closed by the surname „— Rolów”, underlined with a wavy stroke exactly as collective surnames are underlined in this register („Nurzyńskich”, „Borkowskich”, „Sulejów”, „Radomyskich”). By the pattern of a collective entry the surname of all sixteen would therefore be ROLA, and the second elements („Kornickiego”, „Hadrika”, „Kacprzyka”, „Krupczyka”, „Żakowicza”, „Bojanka”) would be BYNAMES. I have entered it otherwise — to each his own second element as a surname, and the surname „Rola” only to the four persons whom the card leaves without a second element — because Kornicki is a surname attested in the neighbourhood, and bynames the card index nowhere else uses in this village. The resolution (surnames or bynames) requires the owner's decision; the text itself is entered literally. THE NUMBER OF PERSONS: sixteen records, sixteen hearths („po 1 dymie”), but seventeen persons, because „Franciszka z bratem” is two persons on one hearth. At „Andrzeja Krupczyka” and „Macieja Krupczyka” the ink is corrected (the surnames written one after the other), but both forenames are legible and both are needed for the sixteen hearths to come out. A WOMAN: „Piotrowej Bojakowej” — a form derived from the husband's name, the card gives no forename of her own; the surname is written in the feminine form, as it stands. The second element [reading uncertain] — it may be „Bojankowej”, because two lines below stands „Józefa Bojanka”.
the same entry also names: Kornicki Józef, Bojakowa, Rola Franciszek, Hadrik Michał, Bojanek Józef, Kacprzyk Franciszek, Kacprzyk Jan, Kacprzyk Piotr, Krupczyk Andrzej, Krupczyk Maciej, Żakowicz Paweł, Rola Adam †, Żakowicz Antoni, Rola Wojciech †, Rola Jakób †16 persons on 16 hearths
FOR THE OWNER'S DECISION. A collective entry closed by the surname „— Rolów”, underlined with a wavy stroke exactly as collective surnames are underlined in this register („Nurzyńskich”, „Borkowskich”, „Sulejów”, „Radomyskich”). By the pattern of a collective entry the surname of all sixteen would therefore be ROLA, and the second elements („Kornickiego”, „Hadrika”, „Kacprzyka”, „Krupczyka”, „Żakowicza”, „Bojanka”) would be BYNAMES. I have entered it otherwise — to each his own second element as a surname, and the surname „Rola” only to the four persons whom the card leaves without a second element — because Kornicki is a surname attested in the neighbourhood, and bynames the card index nowhere else uses in this village. The resolution (surnames or bynames) requires the owner's decision; the text itself is entered literally. THE NUMBER OF PERSONS: sixteen records, sixteen hearths („po 1 dymie”), but seventeen persons, because „Franciszka z bratem” is two persons on one hearth. At „Andrzeja Krupczyka” and „Macieja Krupczyka” the ink is corrected (the surnames written one after the other), but both forenames are legible and both are needed for the sixteen hearths to come out. A WOMAN: „Piotrowej Bojakowej” — a form derived from the husband's name, the card gives no forename of her own; the surname is written in the feminine form, as it stands. The second element [reading uncertain] — it may be „Bojankowej”, because two lines below stands „Józefa Bojanka”.
the same entry also names: Kornicki Józef, Hadrik Jan, Bojakowa, Rola Franciszek, Bojanek Józef, Kacprzyk Franciszek, Kacprzyk Jan, Kacprzyk Piotr, Krupczyk Andrzej, Krupczyk Maciej, Żakowicz Paweł, Rola Adam †, Żakowicz Antoni, Rola Wojciech †, Rola Jakób †16 persons on 16 hearths
FOR THE OWNER'S DECISION. A collective entry closed by the surname „— Rolów”, underlined with a wavy stroke exactly as collective surnames are underlined in this register („Nurzyńskich”, „Borkowskich”, „Sulejów”, „Radomyskich”). By the pattern of a collective entry the surname of all sixteen would therefore be ROLA, and the second elements („Kornickiego”, „Hadrika”, „Kacprzyka”, „Krupczyka”, „Żakowicza”, „Bojanka”) would be BYNAMES. I have entered it otherwise — to each his own second element as a surname, and the surname „Rola” only to the four persons whom the card leaves without a second element — because Kornicki is a surname attested in the neighbourhood, and bynames the card index nowhere else uses in this village. The resolution (surnames or bynames) requires the owner's decision; the text itself is entered literally. THE NUMBER OF PERSONS: sixteen records, sixteen hearths („po 1 dymie”), but seventeen persons, because „Franciszka z bratem” is two persons on one hearth. At „Andrzeja Krupczyka” and „Macieja Krupczyka” the ink is corrected (the surnames written one after the other), but both forenames are legible and both are needed for the sixteen hearths to come out. A WOMAN: „Piotrowej Bojakowej” — a form derived from the husband's name, the card gives no forename of her own; the surname is written in the feminine form, as it stands. The second element [reading uncertain] — it may be „Bojankowej”, because two lines below stands „Józefa Bojanka”.
the same entry also names: Kornicki Józef, Hadrik Jan, Bojakowa, Rola Franciszek, Hadrik Michał, Bojanek Józef, Kacprzyk Jan, Kacprzyk Piotr, Krupczyk Andrzej, Krupczyk Maciej, Żakowicz Paweł, Rola Adam †, Żakowicz Antoni, Rola Wojciech †, Rola Jakób †16 persons on 16 hearths
FOR THE OWNER'S DECISION. A collective entry closed by the surname „— Rolów”, underlined with a wavy stroke exactly as collective surnames are underlined in this register („Nurzyńskich”, „Borkowskich”, „Sulejów”, „Radomyskich”). By the pattern of a collective entry the surname of all sixteen would therefore be ROLA, and the second elements („Kornickiego”, „Hadrika”, „Kacprzyka”, „Krupczyka”, „Żakowicza”, „Bojanka”) would be BYNAMES. I have entered it otherwise — to each his own second element as a surname, and the surname „Rola” only to the four persons whom the card leaves without a second element — because Kornicki is a surname attested in the neighbourhood, and bynames the card index nowhere else uses in this village. The resolution (surnames or bynames) requires the owner's decision; the text itself is entered literally. THE NUMBER OF PERSONS: sixteen records, sixteen hearths („po 1 dymie”), but seventeen persons, because „Franciszka z bratem” is two persons on one hearth. At „Andrzeja Krupczyka” and „Macieja Krupczyka” the ink is corrected (the surnames written one after the other), but both forenames are legible and both are needed for the sixteen hearths to come out. A WOMAN: „Piotrowej Bojakowej” — a form derived from the husband's name, the card gives no forename of her own; the surname is written in the feminine form, as it stands. The second element [reading uncertain] — it may be „Bojankowej”, because two lines below stands „Józefa Bojanka”.
the same entry also names: Kornicki Józef, Hadrik Jan, Bojakowa, Rola Franciszek, Hadrik Michał, Bojanek Józef, Kacprzyk Franciszek, Kacprzyk Piotr, Krupczyk Andrzej, Krupczyk Maciej, Żakowicz Paweł, Rola Adam †, Żakowicz Antoni, Rola Wojciech †, Rola Jakób †16 persons on 16 hearths
FOR THE OWNER'S DECISION. A collective entry closed by the surname „— Rolów”, underlined with a wavy stroke exactly as collective surnames are underlined in this register („Nurzyńskich”, „Borkowskich”, „Sulejów”, „Radomyskich”). By the pattern of a collective entry the surname of all sixteen would therefore be ROLA, and the second elements („Kornickiego”, „Hadrika”, „Kacprzyka”, „Krupczyka”, „Żakowicza”, „Bojanka”) would be BYNAMES. I have entered it otherwise — to each his own second element as a surname, and the surname „Rola” only to the four persons whom the card leaves without a second element — because Kornicki is a surname attested in the neighbourhood, and bynames the card index nowhere else uses in this village. The resolution (surnames or bynames) requires the owner's decision; the text itself is entered literally. THE NUMBER OF PERSONS: sixteen records, sixteen hearths („po 1 dymie”), but seventeen persons, because „Franciszka z bratem” is two persons on one hearth. At „Andrzeja Krupczyka” and „Macieja Krupczyka” the ink is corrected (the surnames written one after the other), but both forenames are legible and both are needed for the sixteen hearths to come out. A WOMAN: „Piotrowej Bojakowej” — a form derived from the husband's name, the card gives no forename of her own; the surname is written in the feminine form, as it stands. The second element [reading uncertain] — it may be „Bojankowej”, because two lines below stands „Józefa Bojanka”.
the same entry also names: Kornicki Józef, Hadrik Jan, Bojakowa, Rola Franciszek, Hadrik Michał, Bojanek Józef, Kacprzyk Franciszek, Kacprzyk Jan, Krupczyk Andrzej, Krupczyk Maciej, Żakowicz Paweł, Rola Adam †, Żakowicz Antoni, Rola Wojciech †, Rola Jakób †16 persons on 16 hearths
FOR THE OWNER'S DECISION. A collective entry closed by the surname „— Rolów”, underlined with a wavy stroke exactly as collective surnames are underlined in this register („Nurzyńskich”, „Borkowskich”, „Sulejów”, „Radomyskich”). By the pattern of a collective entry the surname of all sixteen would therefore be ROLA, and the second elements („Kornickiego”, „Hadrika”, „Kacprzyka”, „Krupczyka”, „Żakowicza”, „Bojanka”) would be BYNAMES. I have entered it otherwise — to each his own second element as a surname, and the surname „Rola” only to the four persons whom the card leaves without a second element — because Kornicki is a surname attested in the neighbourhood, and bynames the card index nowhere else uses in this village. The resolution (surnames or bynames) requires the owner's decision; the text itself is entered literally. THE NUMBER OF PERSONS: sixteen records, sixteen hearths („po 1 dymie”), but seventeen persons, because „Franciszka z bratem” is two persons on one hearth. At „Andrzeja Krupczyka” and „Macieja Krupczyka” the ink is corrected (the surnames written one after the other), but both forenames are legible and both are needed for the sixteen hearths to come out. A WOMAN: „Piotrowej Bojakowej” — a form derived from the husband's name, the card gives no forename of her own; the surname is written in the feminine form, as it stands. The second element [reading uncertain] — it may be „Bojankowej”, because two lines below stands „Józefa Bojanka”.
the same entry also names: Hadrik Jan, Bojakowa, Rola Franciszek, Hadrik Michał, Bojanek Józef, Kacprzyk Franciszek, Kacprzyk Jan, Kacprzyk Piotr, Krupczyk Andrzej, Krupczyk Maciej, Żakowicz Paweł, Rola Adam †, Żakowicz Antoni, Rola Wojciech †, Rola Jakób †16 persons on 16 hearths
FOR THE OWNER'S DECISION. A collective entry closed by the surname „— Rolów”, underlined with a wavy stroke exactly as collective surnames are underlined in this register („Nurzyńskich”, „Borkowskich”, „Sulejów”, „Radomyskich”). By the pattern of a collective entry the surname of all sixteen would therefore be ROLA, and the second elements („Kornickiego”, „Hadrika”, „Kacprzyka”, „Krupczyka”, „Żakowicza”, „Bojanka”) would be BYNAMES. I have entered it otherwise — to each his own second element as a surname, and the surname „Rola” only to the four persons whom the card leaves without a second element — because Kornicki is a surname attested in the neighbourhood, and bynames the card index nowhere else uses in this village. The resolution (surnames or bynames) requires the owner's decision; the text itself is entered literally. THE NUMBER OF PERSONS: sixteen records, sixteen hearths („po 1 dymie”), but seventeen persons, because „Franciszka z bratem” is two persons on one hearth. At „Andrzeja Krupczyka” and „Macieja Krupczyka” the ink is corrected (the surnames written one after the other), but both forenames are legible and both are needed for the sixteen hearths to come out. A WOMAN: „Piotrowej Bojakowej” — a form derived from the husband's name, the card gives no forename of her own; the surname is written in the feminine form, as it stands. The second element [reading uncertain] — it may be „Bojankowej”, because two lines below stands „Józefa Bojanka”.
the same entry also names: Kornicki Józef, Hadrik Jan, Bojakowa, Rola Franciszek, Hadrik Michał, Bojanek Józef, Kacprzyk Franciszek, Kacprzyk Jan, Kacprzyk Piotr, Krupczyk Maciej, Żakowicz Paweł, Rola Adam †, Żakowicz Antoni, Rola Wojciech †, Rola Jakób †16 persons on 16 hearths
FOR THE OWNER'S DECISION. A collective entry closed by the surname „— Rolów”, underlined with a wavy stroke exactly as collective surnames are underlined in this register („Nurzyńskich”, „Borkowskich”, „Sulejów”, „Radomyskich”). By the pattern of a collective entry the surname of all sixteen would therefore be ROLA, and the second elements („Kornickiego”, „Hadrika”, „Kacprzyka”, „Krupczyka”, „Żakowicza”, „Bojanka”) would be BYNAMES. I have entered it otherwise — to each his own second element as a surname, and the surname „Rola” only to the four persons whom the card leaves without a second element — because Kornicki is a surname attested in the neighbourhood, and bynames the card index nowhere else uses in this village. The resolution (surnames or bynames) requires the owner's decision; the text itself is entered literally. THE NUMBER OF PERSONS: sixteen records, sixteen hearths („po 1 dymie”), but seventeen persons, because „Franciszka z bratem” is two persons on one hearth. At „Andrzeja Krupczyka” and „Macieja Krupczyka” the ink is corrected (the surnames written one after the other), but both forenames are legible and both are needed for the sixteen hearths to come out. A WOMAN: „Piotrowej Bojakowej” — a form derived from the husband's name, the card gives no forename of her own; the surname is written in the feminine form, as it stands. The second element [reading uncertain] — it may be „Bojankowej”, because two lines below stands „Józefa Bojanka”.
the same entry also names: Kornicki Józef, Hadrik Jan, Bojakowa, Rola Franciszek, Hadrik Michał, Bojanek Józef, Kacprzyk Franciszek, Kacprzyk Jan, Kacprzyk Piotr, Krupczyk Andrzej, Żakowicz Paweł, Rola Adam †, Żakowicz Antoni, Rola Wojciech †, Rola Jakób †16 persons on 16 hearths
FOR THE OWNER'S DECISION. A collective entry closed by the surname „— Rolów”, underlined with a wavy stroke exactly as collective surnames are underlined in this register („Nurzyńskich”, „Borkowskich”, „Sulejów”, „Radomyskich”). By the pattern of a collective entry the surname of all sixteen would therefore be ROLA, and the second elements („Kornickiego”, „Hadrika”, „Kacprzyka”, „Krupczyka”, „Żakowicza”, „Bojanka”) would be BYNAMES. I have entered it otherwise — to each his own second element as a surname, and the surname „Rola” only to the four persons whom the card leaves without a second element — because Kornicki is a surname attested in the neighbourhood, and bynames the card index nowhere else uses in this village. The resolution (surnames or bynames) requires the owner's decision; the text itself is entered literally. THE NUMBER OF PERSONS: sixteen records, sixteen hearths („po 1 dymie”), but seventeen persons, because „Franciszka z bratem” is two persons on one hearth. At „Andrzeja Krupczyka” and „Macieja Krupczyka” the ink is corrected (the surnames written one after the other), but both forenames are legible and both are needed for the sixteen hearths to come out. A WOMAN: „Piotrowej Bojakowej” — a form derived from the husband's name, the card gives no forename of her own; the surname is written in the feminine form, as it stands. The second element [reading uncertain] — it may be „Bojankowej”, because two lines below stands „Józefa Bojanka”.
the same entry also names: Kornicki Józef, Hadrik Jan, Bojakowa, Rola Franciszek, Hadrik Michał, Bojanek Józef, Kacprzyk Franciszek, Kacprzyk Jan, Kacprzyk Piotr, Krupczyk Andrzej, Krupczyk Maciej, Żakowicz Paweł, Żakowicz Antoni, Rola Wojciech †, Rola Jakób †16 persons on 16 hearths
FOR THE OWNER'S DECISION. A collective entry closed by the surname „— Rolów”, underlined with a wavy stroke exactly as collective surnames are underlined in this register („Nurzyńskich”, „Borkowskich”, „Sulejów”, „Radomyskich”). By the pattern of a collective entry the surname of all sixteen would therefore be ROLA, and the second elements („Kornickiego”, „Hadrika”, „Kacprzyka”, „Krupczyka”, „Żakowicza”, „Bojanka”) would be BYNAMES. I have entered it otherwise — to each his own second element as a surname, and the surname „Rola” only to the four persons whom the card leaves without a second element — because Kornicki is a surname attested in the neighbourhood, and bynames the card index nowhere else uses in this village. The resolution (surnames or bynames) requires the owner's decision; the text itself is entered literally. THE NUMBER OF PERSONS: sixteen records, sixteen hearths („po 1 dymie”), but seventeen persons, because „Franciszka z bratem” is two persons on one hearth. At „Andrzeja Krupczyka” and „Macieja Krupczyka” the ink is corrected (the surnames written one after the other), but both forenames are legible and both are needed for the sixteen hearths to come out. A WOMAN: „Piotrowej Bojakowej” — a form derived from the husband's name, the card gives no forename of her own; the surname is written in the feminine form, as it stands. The second element [reading uncertain] — it may be „Bojankowej”, because two lines below stands „Józefa Bojanka”.
„sukcesor. Adama” — without a surname of his own; the surname from the „— Rolów” that closes the entry.
the same entry also names: Kornicki Józef, Hadrik Jan, Bojakowa, Hadrik Michał, Bojanek Józef, Kacprzyk Franciszek, Kacprzyk Jan, Kacprzyk Piotr, Krupczyk Andrzej, Krupczyk Maciej, Żakowicz Paweł, Rola Adam †, Żakowicz Antoni, Rola Wojciech †, Rola Jakób †16 persons on 16 hearths
FOR THE OWNER'S DECISION. A collective entry closed by the surname „— Rolów”, underlined with a wavy stroke exactly as collective surnames are underlined in this register („Nurzyńskich”, „Borkowskich”, „Sulejów”, „Radomyskich”). By the pattern of a collective entry the surname of all sixteen would therefore be ROLA, and the second elements („Kornickiego”, „Hadrika”, „Kacprzyka”, „Krupczyka”, „Żakowicza”, „Bojanka”) would be BYNAMES. I have entered it otherwise — to each his own second element as a surname, and the surname „Rola” only to the four persons whom the card leaves without a second element — because Kornicki is a surname attested in the neighbourhood, and bynames the card index nowhere else uses in this village. The resolution (surnames or bynames) requires the owner's decision; the text itself is entered literally. THE NUMBER OF PERSONS: sixteen records, sixteen hearths („po 1 dymie”), but seventeen persons, because „Franciszka z bratem” is two persons on one hearth. At „Andrzeja Krupczyka” and „Macieja Krupczyka” the ink is corrected (the surnames written one after the other), but both forenames are legible and both are needed for the sixteen hearths to come out. A WOMAN: „Piotrowej Bojakowej” — a form derived from the husband's name, the card gives no forename of her own; the surname is written in the feminine form, as it stands. The second element [reading uncertain] — it may be „Bojankowej”, because two lines below stands „Józefa Bojanka”.
„Franciszka z bratem” — two persons on one hearth; the brother the card does not name. The surname from the „— Rolów” that closes the entry.
the same entry also names: Kornicki Józef, Hadrik Jan, Bojakowa, Rola Franciszek, Hadrik Michał, Bojanek Józef, Kacprzyk Franciszek, Kacprzyk Jan, Kacprzyk Piotr, Krupczyk Andrzej, Krupczyk Maciej, Żakowicz Paweł, Rola Adam †, Żakowicz Antoni, Rola Wojciech †16 persons on 16 hearths
FOR THE OWNER'S DECISION. A collective entry closed by the surname „— Rolów”, underlined with a wavy stroke exactly as collective surnames are underlined in this register („Nurzyńskich”, „Borkowskich”, „Sulejów”, „Radomyskich”). By the pattern of a collective entry the surname of all sixteen would therefore be ROLA, and the second elements („Kornickiego”, „Hadrika”, „Kacprzyka”, „Krupczyka”, „Żakowicza”, „Bojanka”) would be BYNAMES. I have entered it otherwise — to each his own second element as a surname, and the surname „Rola” only to the four persons whom the card leaves without a second element — because Kornicki is a surname attested in the neighbourhood, and bynames the card index nowhere else uses in this village. The resolution (surnames or bynames) requires the owner's decision; the text itself is entered literally. THE NUMBER OF PERSONS: sixteen records, sixteen hearths („po 1 dymie”), but seventeen persons, because „Franciszka z bratem” is two persons on one hearth. At „Andrzeja Krupczyka” and „Macieja Krupczyka” the ink is corrected (the surnames written one after the other), but both forenames are legible and both are needed for the sixteen hearths to come out. A WOMAN: „Piotrowej Bojakowej” — a form derived from the husband's name, the card gives no forename of her own; the surname is written in the feminine form, as it stands. The second element [reading uncertain] — it may be „Bojankowej”, because two lines below stands „Józefa Bojanka”.
„sukces. Jakóba” — without a surname of his own; the surname from the „— Rolów” that closes the entry.
the same entry also names: Kornicki Józef, Hadrik Jan, Bojakowa, Rola Franciszek, Hadrik Michał, Bojanek Józef, Kacprzyk Franciszek, Kacprzyk Jan, Kacprzyk Piotr, Krupczyk Andrzej, Krupczyk Maciej, Żakowicz Paweł, Rola Adam †, Żakowicz Antoni, Rola Jakób †16 persons on 16 hearths
FOR THE OWNER'S DECISION. A collective entry closed by the surname „— Rolów”, underlined with a wavy stroke exactly as collective surnames are underlined in this register („Nurzyńskich”, „Borkowskich”, „Sulejów”, „Radomyskich”). By the pattern of a collective entry the surname of all sixteen would therefore be ROLA, and the second elements („Kornickiego”, „Hadrika”, „Kacprzyka”, „Krupczyka”, „Żakowicza”, „Bojanka”) would be BYNAMES. I have entered it otherwise — to each his own second element as a surname, and the surname „Rola” only to the four persons whom the card leaves without a second element — because Kornicki is a surname attested in the neighbourhood, and bynames the card index nowhere else uses in this village. The resolution (surnames or bynames) requires the owner's decision; the text itself is entered literally. THE NUMBER OF PERSONS: sixteen records, sixteen hearths („po 1 dymie”), but seventeen persons, because „Franciszka z bratem” is two persons on one hearth. At „Andrzeja Krupczyka” and „Macieja Krupczyka” the ink is corrected (the surnames written one after the other), but both forenames are legible and both are needed for the sixteen hearths to come out. A WOMAN: „Piotrowej Bojakowej” — a form derived from the husband's name, the card gives no forename of her own; the surname is written in the feminine form, as it stands. The second element [reading uncertain] — it may be „Bojankowej”, because two lines below stands „Józefa Bojanka”.
„sukces. Wojciecha” — without a surname of his own; the surname from the „— Rolów” that closes the entry.
the same entry also names: Kornicki Józef, Hadrik Jan, Bojakowa, Rola Franciszek, Hadrik Michał, Bojanek Józef, Kacprzyk Franciszek, Kacprzyk Jan, Kacprzyk Piotr, Krupczyk Andrzej, Krupczyk Maciej, Żakowicz Paweł, Rola Adam †, Rola Wojciech †, Rola Jakób †16 persons on 16 hearths
FOR THE OWNER'S DECISION. A collective entry closed by the surname „— Rolów”, underlined with a wavy stroke exactly as collective surnames are underlined in this register („Nurzyńskich”, „Borkowskich”, „Sulejów”, „Radomyskich”). By the pattern of a collective entry the surname of all sixteen would therefore be ROLA, and the second elements („Kornickiego”, „Hadrika”, „Kacprzyka”, „Krupczyka”, „Żakowicza”, „Bojanka”) would be BYNAMES. I have entered it otherwise — to each his own second element as a surname, and the surname „Rola” only to the four persons whom the card leaves without a second element — because Kornicki is a surname attested in the neighbourhood, and bynames the card index nowhere else uses in this village. The resolution (surnames or bynames) requires the owner's decision; the text itself is entered literally. THE NUMBER OF PERSONS: sixteen records, sixteen hearths („po 1 dymie”), but seventeen persons, because „Franciszka z bratem” is two persons on one hearth. At „Andrzeja Krupczyka” and „Macieja Krupczyka” the ink is corrected (the surnames written one after the other), but both forenames are legible and both are needed for the sixteen hearths to come out. A WOMAN: „Piotrowej Bojakowej” — a form derived from the husband's name, the card gives no forename of her own; the surname is written in the feminine form, as it stands. The second element [reading uncertain] — it may be „Bojankowej”, because two lines below stands „Józefa Bojanka”.
the same entry also names: Kornicki Józef, Hadrik Jan, Bojakowa, Rola Franciszek, Hadrik Michał, Bojanek Józef, Kacprzyk Franciszek, Kacprzyk Jan, Kacprzyk Piotr, Krupczyk Andrzej, Krupczyk Maciej, Rola Adam †, Żakowicz Antoni, Rola Wojciech †, Rola Jakób †16 persons on 16 hearths
FOR THE OWNER'S DECISION. A collective entry closed by the surname „— Rolów”, underlined with a wavy stroke exactly as collective surnames are underlined in this register („Nurzyńskich”, „Borkowskich”, „Sulejów”, „Radomyskich”). By the pattern of a collective entry the surname of all sixteen would therefore be ROLA, and the second elements („Kornickiego”, „Hadrika”, „Kacprzyka”, „Krupczyka”, „Żakowicza”, „Bojanka”) would be BYNAMES. I have entered it otherwise — to each his own second element as a surname, and the surname „Rola” only to the four persons whom the card leaves without a second element — because Kornicki is a surname attested in the neighbourhood, and bynames the card index nowhere else uses in this village. The resolution (surnames or bynames) requires the owner's decision; the text itself is entered literally. THE NUMBER OF PERSONS: sixteen records, sixteen hearths („po 1 dymie”), but seventeen persons, because „Franciszka z bratem” is two persons on one hearth. At „Andrzeja Krupczyka” and „Macieja Krupczyka” the ink is corrected (the surnames written one after the other), but both forenames are legible and both are needed for the sixteen hearths to come out. A WOMAN: „Piotrowej Bojakowej” — a form derived from the husband's name, the card gives no forename of her own; the surname is written in the feminine form, as it stands. The second element [reading uncertain] — it may be „Bojankowej”, because two lines below stands „Józefa Bojanka”.
the same entry also names: Izdebski Wojciech2 persons on 1 hearth
Two persons, one hearth — the card counts them together („dym 1”, underlined). The card's reckoning confirms it.
the same entry also names: Izdebski Andrzej2 persons on 1 hearth
Two persons, one hearth — the card counts them together („dym 1”, underlined). The card's reckoning confirms it.
the same entry also names: Thorzewski Mateusz, Thorzewski Wojciech, Thorzewski Marjanna4 persons on 3 hearths
FOUR PERSONS, THREE HEARTHS — the card does not explain this. The number of hearths („3”, underlined) is certain, confirmed by the total „Razem dymów 65”. Beside the number of the entry stands a struck-out „cz”, but not one of the four forenames is struck through. The difference I leave as a discrepancy of the source. A WOMAN: „Marjanny” — the surname stands once, in the masculine plural, and so it is entered as it stands („Thorzewski”); the gender is recognized by the forename. THE WRITING OF THE SURNAME: the card writes here and in entry 11 „Thorzewskich/Thorzewskiego”, and on cards 8-9 (T89, a colleague's extract) „Tchórzewskich”. The form „Thorzewski” is attested in the neighbourhood beside „Tchórzewski” — the unification I leave to the owner.
the same entry also names: Thorzewski Franciszek, Thorzewski Mateusz, Thorzewski Wojciech4 persons on 3 hearths
FOUR PERSONS, THREE HEARTHS — the card does not explain this. The number of hearths („3”, underlined) is certain, confirmed by the total „Razem dymów 65”. Beside the number of the entry stands a struck-out „cz”, but not one of the four forenames is struck through. The difference I leave as a discrepancy of the source. A WOMAN: „Marjanny” — the surname stands once, in the masculine plural, and so it is entered as it stands („Thorzewski”); the gender is recognized by the forename. THE WRITING OF THE SURNAME: the card writes here and in entry 11 „Thorzewskich/Thorzewskiego”, and on cards 8-9 (T89, a colleague's extract) „Tchórzewskich”. The form „Thorzewski” is attested in the neighbourhood beside „Tchórzewski” — the unification I leave to the owner.
the same entry also names: Thorzewski Franciszek, Thorzewski Wojciech, Thorzewski Marjanna4 persons on 3 hearths
FOUR PERSONS, THREE HEARTHS — the card does not explain this. The number of hearths („3”, underlined) is certain, confirmed by the total „Razem dymów 65”. Beside the number of the entry stands a struck-out „cz”, but not one of the four forenames is struck through. The difference I leave as a discrepancy of the source. A WOMAN: „Marjanny” — the surname stands once, in the masculine plural, and so it is entered as it stands („Thorzewski”); the gender is recognized by the forename. THE WRITING OF THE SURNAME: the card writes here and in entry 11 „Thorzewskich/Thorzewskiego”, and on cards 8-9 (T89, a colleague's extract) „Tchórzewskich”. The form „Thorzewski” is attested in the neighbourhood beside „Tchórzewski” — the unification I leave to the owner.
the same entry also names: Thorzewski Franciszek, Thorzewski Mateusz, Thorzewski Marjanna4 persons on 3 hearths
FOUR PERSONS, THREE HEARTHS — the card does not explain this. The number of hearths („3”, underlined) is certain, confirmed by the total „Razem dymów 65”. Beside the number of the entry stands a struck-out „cz”, but not one of the four forenames is struck through. The difference I leave as a discrepancy of the source. A WOMAN: „Marjanny” — the surname stands once, in the masculine plural, and so it is entered as it stands („Thorzewski”); the gender is recognized by the forename. THE WRITING OF THE SURNAME: the card writes here and in entry 11 „Thorzewskich/Thorzewskiego”, and on cards 8-9 (T89, a colleague's extract) „Tchórzewskich”. The form „Thorzewski” is attested in the neighbourhood beside „Tchórzewski” — the unification I leave to the owner.
The abbreviation before „cz.” is read as „nt.” [reading uncertain] — two letters, possibly „nb.”. The only building named in the whole of my part of the register: „chałupa pusta”, an empty cottage, counting for one hearth. The same person stands in entry 10 — the card counts her empty cottage separately.
the same entry also names: Lipiński Józef2 persons on 2 hearths
Two persons, two hearths — it agrees. The card writes „Lipinskich”, without the stroke over the „n”.
the same entry also names: Lipiński Florjan2 persons on 2 hearths
Two persons, two hearths — it agrees. The card writes „Lipinskich”, without the stroke over the „n”.
the same entry also names: Szkryszowski Szymon2 persons on 2 hearths
Two persons, two hearths — it agrees. The surname the card writes in the SINGULAR („Szkryszowskiego”) despite two forenames, and differently from entry 2 („Szkrzyszowskich”); on card 8 (T89, a colleague's extract) the same two stand as „Jana, Szymona, Skrzyszewskich”. I record the form of the card.
the same entry also names: Szkryszowski Jan2 persons on 2 hearths
Two persons, two hearths — it agrees. The surname the card writes in the SINGULAR („Szkryszowskiego”) despite two forenames, and differently from entry 2 („Szkrzyszowskich”); on card 8 (T89, a colleague's extract) the same two stand as „Jana, Szymona, Skrzyszewskich”. I record the form of the card.
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Jan, Jastrzębski Tomasz, Jastrzębski Jakób4 persons on 4 hearths
The forename „Jakóba,” is added above the line, in smaller writing, above the word „Wojciechowej” — an addition after the fact. Without it there would be three persons on four hearths; with it the reckoning closes. A WOMAN: „Wojciechowej” — a form derived from the husband's name, without a forename of her own, recorded literally in the recorded form of the name. The surname in the masculine plural („Jastrzebskich”), and so entered as it stands.
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Jan, Jastrzębski, Jastrzębski Tomasz4 persons on 4 hearths
The forename „Jakóba,” is added above the line, in smaller writing, above the word „Wojciechowej” — an addition after the fact. Without it there would be three persons on four hearths; with it the reckoning closes. A WOMAN: „Wojciechowej” — a form derived from the husband's name, without a forename of her own, recorded literally in the recorded form of the name. The surname in the masculine plural („Jastrzebskich”), and so entered as it stands.
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski, Jastrzębski Tomasz, Jastrzębski Jakób4 persons on 4 hearths
The forename „Jakóba,” is added above the line, in smaller writing, above the word „Wojciechowej” — an addition after the fact. Without it there would be three persons on four hearths; with it the reckoning closes. A WOMAN: „Wojciechowej” — a form derived from the husband's name, without a forename of her own, recorded literally in the recorded form of the name. The surname in the masculine plural („Jastrzebskich”), and so entered as it stands.
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Jan, Jastrzębski, Jastrzębski Jakób4 persons on 4 hearths
The forename „Jakóba,” is added above the line, in smaller writing, above the word „Wojciechowej” — an addition after the fact. Without it there would be three persons on four hearths; with it the reckoning closes. A WOMAN: „Wojciechowej” — a form derived from the husband's name, without a forename of her own, recorded literally in the recorded form of the name. The surname in the masculine plural („Jastrzebskich”), and so entered as it stands.
the same entry also names: Leliński Tomasz «Drozdza», Leliński Mateusz3 persons on 3 hearths
Three persons, three hearths — it agrees. „Drozdza” I have taken as a BYNAME of Tomasz, because the collective surname of the entry („Lelińskich”) stands, by the pattern of this register, only at the end; the byname Drozd is attested in the neighbourhood. A reading of „Tomasza Drozdza” as a surname of its own is also possible — then the three persons would have two different surnames. [reading uncertain as to the status of the second element, not as to the letters].
the same entry also names: Leliński Tomasz «Drozdza», Leliński Andrzej3 persons on 3 hearths
Three persons, three hearths — it agrees. „Drozdza” I have taken as a BYNAME of Tomasz, because the collective surname of the entry („Lelińskich”) stands, by the pattern of this register, only at the end; the byname Drozd is attested in the neighbourhood. A reading of „Tomasza Drozdza” as a surname of its own is also possible — then the three persons would have two different surnames. [reading uncertain as to the status of the second element, not as to the letters].
the same entry also names: Leliński Andrzej, Leliński Mateusz3 persons on 3 hearths
Three persons, three hearths — it agrees. „Drozdza” I have taken as a BYNAME of Tomasz, because the collective surname of the entry („Lelińskich”) stands, by the pattern of this register, only at the end; the byname Drozd is attested in the neighbourhood. A reading of „Tomasza Drozdza” as a surname of its own is also possible — then the three persons would have two different surnames. [reading uncertain as to the status of the second element, not as to the letters].
the same entry also names: Nurzyński Paweł, Nurzyński Franciszek, Nurzyński Walenty, Nurzyński Józef, Nurzyński Jan, Nurzyński Piotr7 persons on 7 hearths
Seven persons, seven hearths — it agrees. A WOMAN: „Wojciechowej wdowy” — she is alive (status: widow); this makes Wojciech deceased, but the card does not count him separately in this entry, and so I do not enter him. The surname in the masculine plural, entered as it stands.
the same entry also names: Nurzyński Paweł, Nurzyński, Nurzyński Walenty, Nurzyński Józef, Nurzyński Jan, Nurzyński Piotr7 persons on 7 hearths
Seven persons, seven hearths — it agrees. A WOMAN: „Wojciechowej wdowy” — she is alive (status: widow); this makes Wojciech deceased, but the card does not count him separately in this entry, and so I do not enter him. The surname in the masculine plural, entered as it stands.
the same entry also names: Nurzyński Paweł, Nurzyński, Nurzyński Franciszek, Nurzyński Walenty, Nurzyński Józef, Nurzyński Piotr7 persons on 7 hearths
Seven persons, seven hearths — it agrees. A WOMAN: „Wojciechowej wdowy” — she is alive (status: widow); this makes Wojciech deceased, but the card does not count him separately in this entry, and so I do not enter him. The surname in the masculine plural, entered as it stands.
the same entry also names: Nurzyński Paweł, Nurzyński, Nurzyński Franciszek, Nurzyński Walenty, Nurzyński Jan, Nurzyński Piotr7 persons on 7 hearths
Seven persons, seven hearths — it agrees. A WOMAN: „Wojciechowej wdowy” — she is alive (status: widow); this makes Wojciech deceased, but the card does not count him separately in this entry, and so I do not enter him. The surname in the masculine plural, entered as it stands.
the same entry also names: Nurzyński, Nurzyński Franciszek, Nurzyński Walenty, Nurzyński Józef, Nurzyński Jan, Nurzyński Piotr7 persons on 7 hearths
Seven persons, seven hearths — it agrees. A WOMAN: „Wojciechowej wdowy” — she is alive (status: widow); this makes Wojciech deceased, but the card does not count him separately in this entry, and so I do not enter him. The surname in the masculine plural, entered as it stands.
the same entry also names: Nurzyński Paweł, Nurzyński, Nurzyński Franciszek, Nurzyński Walenty, Nurzyński Józef, Nurzyński Jan7 persons on 7 hearths
Seven persons, seven hearths — it agrees. A WOMAN: „Wojciechowej wdowy” — she is alive (status: widow); this makes Wojciech deceased, but the card does not count him separately in this entry, and so I do not enter him. The surname in the masculine plural, entered as it stands.
the same entry also names: Nurzyński Paweł, Nurzyński, Nurzyński Franciszek, Nurzyński Józef, Nurzyński Jan, Nurzyński Piotr7 persons on 7 hearths
Seven persons, seven hearths — it agrees. A WOMAN: „Wojciechowej wdowy” — she is alive (status: widow); this makes Wojciech deceased, but the card does not count him separately in this entry, and so I do not enter him. The surname in the masculine plural, entered as it stands.
the same entry also names: Sulej Tomasz «Dudzik», Sulej Stefan3 persons on 2 hearths
THREE PERSONS, TWO HEARTHS — the card does not explain this. The number of hearths („2”) is certain: without it the total „Razem dymów 65”, which card 3 gives itself, does not come out. The line is clean, there are neither deletions nor additions beside it, and so the difference stands as a discrepancy of the source, not an error of reading. „Dudzika” I have taken as a BYNAME of Tomasz (the collective surname „Sulejów” stands at the end, by the pattern of this register); the same three Sulejs return on card 6 in T94 („cz. Bonawentury; Szczepana i Tomasza - Sulejów - po 1 dymie 3 dymy” — a colleague's extract), which confirms the surname, but gives a third hearth and a third forename „Szczepan” in place of „Stefan”.
the same entry also names: Sulej Tomasz «Dudzik», Sulej Bonawentura3 persons on 2 hearths
THREE PERSONS, TWO HEARTHS — the card does not explain this. The number of hearths („2”) is certain: without it the total „Razem dymów 65”, which card 3 gives itself, does not come out. The line is clean, there are neither deletions nor additions beside it, and so the difference stands as a discrepancy of the source, not an error of reading. „Dudzika” I have taken as a BYNAME of Tomasz (the collective surname „Sulejów” stands at the end, by the pattern of this register); the same three Sulejs return on card 6 in T94 („cz. Bonawentury; Szczepana i Tomasza - Sulejów - po 1 dymie 3 dymy” — a colleague's extract), which confirms the surname, but gives a third hearth and a third forename „Szczepan” in place of „Stefan”.
the same entry also names: Sulej Bonawentura, Sulej Stefan3 persons on 2 hearths
THREE PERSONS, TWO HEARTHS — the card does not explain this. The number of hearths („2”) is certain: without it the total „Razem dymów 65”, which card 3 gives itself, does not come out. The line is clean, there are neither deletions nor additions beside it, and so the difference stands as a discrepancy of the source, not an error of reading. „Dudzika” I have taken as a BYNAME of Tomasz (the collective surname „Sulejów” stands at the end, by the pattern of this register); the same three Sulejs return on card 6 in T94 („cz. Bonawentury; Szczepana i Tomasza - Sulejów - po 1 dymie 3 dymy” — a colleague's extract), which confirms the surname, but gives a third hearth and a third forename „Szczepan” in place of „Stefan”.
the same entry also names: Borkowski Jan, Borkowski Maciej3 persons on 3 hearths
The first forename of the entry („Antoniego”) is STRUCK THROUGH on the card — and so I do not enter it; without it three persons remain on three hearths and the card's reckoning closes. Above the deletion a small figure is added, illegible.
the same entry also names: Borkowski Maciej, Borkowski Jakób3 persons on 3 hearths
The first forename of the entry („Antoniego”) is STRUCK THROUGH on the card — and so I do not enter it; without it three persons remain on three hearths and the card's reckoning closes. Above the deletion a small figure is added, illegible.
the same entry also names: Borkowski Jan, Borkowski Jakób3 persons on 3 hearths
The first forename of the entry („Antoniego”) is STRUCK THROUGH on the card — and so I do not enter it; without it three persons remain on three hearths and the card's reckoning closes. Above the deletion a small figure is added, illegible.
the same entry also names: Radomyski Piotr, Radomyski Wawrzyniec, Radomyski Jan, Radomyski Jakób, Radomyski Maciej6 persons on 5 hearths
SIX PERSONS, FIVE HEARTHS — the card does not explain this, and no forename is struck through. The number of hearths („5”, underlined) is certain: the total „Razem dymów 65” on the same card confirms it. The difference stands as a discrepancy of the source. The forenames are divided by dashes into pairs („Bartłomieja i Jana”, „Jakóba, i Macieja”), which may mean that one of the pairs sits on one hearth, but the card does not say so.
the same entry also names: Radomyski Piotr, Radomyski Wawrzyniec, Radomyski Bartłomiej, Radomyski Jan, Radomyski Maciej6 persons on 5 hearths
SIX PERSONS, FIVE HEARTHS — the card does not explain this, and no forename is struck through. The number of hearths („5”, underlined) is certain: the total „Razem dymów 65” on the same card confirms it. The difference stands as a discrepancy of the source. The forenames are divided by dashes into pairs („Bartłomieja i Jana”, „Jakóba, i Macieja”), which may mean that one of the pairs sits on one hearth, but the card does not say so.
the same entry also names: Radomyski Piotr, Radomyski Wawrzyniec, Radomyski Bartłomiej, Radomyski Jakób, Radomyski Maciej6 persons on 5 hearths
SIX PERSONS, FIVE HEARTHS — the card does not explain this, and no forename is struck through. The number of hearths („5”, underlined) is certain: the total „Razem dymów 65” on the same card confirms it. The difference stands as a discrepancy of the source. The forenames are divided by dashes into pairs („Bartłomieja i Jana”, „Jakóba, i Macieja”), which may mean that one of the pairs sits on one hearth, but the card does not say so.
the same entry also names: Radomyski Piotr, Radomyski Wawrzyniec, Radomyski Bartłomiej, Radomyski Jan, Radomyski Jakób6 persons on 5 hearths
SIX PERSONS, FIVE HEARTHS — the card does not explain this, and no forename is struck through. The number of hearths („5”, underlined) is certain: the total „Razem dymów 65” on the same card confirms it. The difference stands as a discrepancy of the source. The forenames are divided by dashes into pairs („Bartłomieja i Jana”, „Jakóba, i Macieja”), which may mean that one of the pairs sits on one hearth, but the card does not say so.
the same entry also names: Radomyski Wawrzyniec, Radomyski Bartłomiej, Radomyski Jan, Radomyski Jakób, Radomyski Maciej6 persons on 5 hearths
SIX PERSONS, FIVE HEARTHS — the card does not explain this, and no forename is struck through. The number of hearths („5”, underlined) is certain: the total „Razem dymów 65” on the same card confirms it. The difference stands as a discrepancy of the source. The forenames are divided by dashes into pairs („Bartłomieja i Jana”, „Jakóba, i Macieja”), which may mean that one of the pairs sits on one hearth, but the card does not say so.
the same entry also names: Radomyski Piotr, Radomyski Bartłomiej, Radomyski Jan, Radomyski Jakób, Radomyski Maciej6 persons on 5 hearths
SIX PERSONS, FIVE HEARTHS — the card does not explain this, and no forename is struck through. The number of hearths („5”, underlined) is certain: the total „Razem dymów 65” on the same card confirms it. The difference stands as a discrepancy of the source. The forenames are divided by dashes into pairs („Bartłomieja i Jana”, „Jakóba, i Macieja”), which may mean that one of the pairs sits on one hearth, but the card does not say so.
The first letter of the surname is written like a „G” with a long bowl; the form Goławski is attested in the neighbourhood. The reading is certain as to the remaining letters.
[reading uncertain] — after the first letter (the same as the „M” in „Michała”) comes „a”, then a group read as „szczy”, then „brodzkiego”. It may be a writing of the surname taken from the village of Mościbrody (Mościbrodzki), but the letters „ości” are not to be seen on the card, and so I do not bend the reading to that form. The number of hearths is certain.
the same entry also names: Zabłocki Ludwik2 persons on 2 hearths
[reading uncertain as to the first letter]. The card writes the surname „Łabłóckich” (or „Żabłóckich” — the sign above the letter can be read in two ways); in the surname I give the form Zabłocki, attested in the neighbourhood, and the writing of the card stays literally in the text of the extract. Two persons, two hearths — it agrees.
the same entry also names: Zabłocki Franciszek2 persons on 2 hearths
[reading uncertain as to the first letter]. The card writes the surname „Łabłóckich” (or „Żabłóckich” — the sign above the letter can be read in two ways); in the surname I give the form Zabłocki, attested in the neighbourhood, and the writing of the card stays literally in the text of the extract. Two persons, two hearths — it agrees.
1789 T89Hearth tax register 1789
I DO NOT SET THE BUILDINGS OUT into the the breakdown of buildings field, because the card itself was correcting its own list and struck part of the words out: after „dwór,” stand two words blotted out with a thick stroke, whose shape answers to „brow.” and „karcz.” — that is, a BREWERY and an INN were entered in this entry and then STRUCK OUT [the reading of the words under the deletion is uncertain]. Further: „4 chat. o 1 gosp.”, then „chat.” with the figure „2” and the word „ogr.” written in above the line, whereupon „bez g. i ogr.” is struck through; in the last line „chat.” with „bez” written above it and a word struck through, and the result „= 9 d.”. The figures of the components cannot, after the corrections, be read with certainty, and so I do not record the buildings set out — the number of hearths alone (9) is certain and the register's total (54) confirms it. The words „browar” and „karczma” I report separately.
the same entry also names: Radomyski Piotr, Radomyski Maciej, Radomyski Paweł, Radomyski Wawrzyniec5 persons on 5 hearths
the same entry also names: Radomyski Piotr, Radomyski Bartłomiej, Radomyski Paweł, Radomyski Wawrzyniec5 persons on 5 hearths
the same entry also names: Radomyski Piotr, Radomyski Maciej, Radomyski Bartłomiej, Radomyski Wawrzyniec5 persons on 5 hearths
the same entry also names: Radomyski Maciej, Radomyski Bartłomiej, Radomyski Paweł, Radomyski Wawrzyniec5 persons on 5 hearths
the same entry also names: Radomyski Piotr, Radomyski Maciej, Radomyski Bartłomiej, Radomyski Paweł5 persons on 5 hearths
the same entry also names: Nurzyński Piotr, Nurzyński Walenty, Nurzyński Paweł, Nurzyński Józef, Nurzyński Szymon6 persons on 6 hearths
the same entry also names: Nurzyński Piotr, Nurzyński Jan, Nurzyński Walenty, Nurzyński Paweł, Nurzyński Szymon6 persons on 6 hearths
the same entry also names: Nurzyński Piotr, Nurzyński Jan, Nurzyński Walenty, Nurzyński Józef, Nurzyński Szymon6 persons on 6 hearths
the same entry also names: Nurzyński Jan, Nurzyński Walenty, Nurzyński Paweł, Nurzyński Józef, Nurzyński Szymon6 persons on 6 hearths
the same entry also names: Nurzyński Piotr, Nurzyński Jan, Nurzyński Walenty, Nurzyński Paweł, Nurzyński Józef6 persons on 6 hearths
the same entry also names: Nurzyński Piotr, Nurzyński Jan, Nurzyński Paweł, Nurzyński Józef, Nurzyński Szymon6 persons on 6 hearths
the same entry also names: Rola Franciszek, Rola Wojciech †, Rola Piotr, Rola Antoni, Rola Jan †, Rola Jan, Rola Józef †, Rola Paweł, Rola Piotr †, Rola Paweł, Rola Wojciech, Rola Maciej «Krupczyk»13 persons on 13 hearths
the entry begins on f. 692 (the addition „z.c.d.” closes it), and the number of hearths is given by f. 693 in its first line: „(każdy po 1 d.) = 13 d.” Thirteen forenames, thirteen hearths — it agrees. A collective entry of the Krasusze type: the family surname „Rolów” stands once, at the end; the byname („Krupczyk”) only beside the man beside whom it stands on the card.
the same entry also names: Rola Franciszek, Rola Wojciech †, Rola Piotr, Rola Adam, Rola Jan †, Rola Jan, Rola Józef †, Rola Paweł, Rola Piotr †, Rola Paweł, Rola Wojciech, Rola Maciej «Krupczyk»13 persons on 13 hearths
the entry begins on f. 692 (the addition „z.c.d.” closes it), and the number of hearths is given by f. 693 in its first line: „(każdy po 1 d.) = 13 d.” Thirteen forenames, thirteen hearths — it agrees. A collective entry of the Krasusze type: the family surname „Rolów” stands once, at the end; the byname („Krupczyk”) only beside the man beside whom it stands on the card.
the same entry also names: Rola Wojciech †, Rola Piotr, Rola Adam, Rola Antoni, Rola Jan †, Rola Jan, Rola Józef †, Rola Paweł, Rola Piotr †, Rola Paweł, Rola Wojciech, Rola Maciej «Krupczyk»13 persons on 13 hearths
the entry begins on f. 692 (the addition „z.c.d.” closes it), and the number of hearths is given by f. 693 in its first line: „(każdy po 1 d.) = 13 d.” Thirteen forenames, thirteen hearths — it agrees. A collective entry of the Krasusze type: the family surname „Rolów” stands once, at the end; the byname („Krupczyk”) only beside the man beside whom it stands on the card.
the same entry also names: Rola Franciszek, Rola Wojciech †, Rola Piotr, Rola Adam, Rola Antoni, Rola Jan †, Rola Józef †, Rola Paweł, Rola Piotr †, Rola Paweł, Rola Wojciech, Rola Maciej «Krupczyk»13 persons on 13 hearths
the entry begins on f. 692 (the addition „z.c.d.” closes it), and the number of hearths is given by f. 693 in its first line: „(każdy po 1 d.) = 13 d.” Thirteen forenames, thirteen hearths — it agrees. A collective entry of the Krasusze type: the family surname „Rolów” stands once, at the end; the byname („Krupczyk”) only beside the man beside whom it stands on the card.
the same entry also names: Rola Franciszek, Rola Wojciech †, Rola Piotr, Rola Adam, Rola Antoni, Rola Jan, Rola Józef †, Rola Paweł, Rola Piotr †, Rola Paweł, Rola Wojciech, Rola Maciej «Krupczyk»13 persons on 13 hearths
the entry begins on f. 692 (the addition „z.c.d.” closes it), and the number of hearths is given by f. 693 in its first line: „(każdy po 1 d.) = 13 d.” Thirteen forenames, thirteen hearths — it agrees. A collective entry of the Krasusze type: the family surname „Rolów” stands once, at the end; the byname („Krupczyk”) only beside the man beside whom it stands on the card.
the same entry also names: Rola Franciszek, Rola Wojciech †, Rola Piotr, Rola Adam, Rola Antoni, Rola Jan †, Rola Jan, Rola Paweł, Rola Piotr †, Rola Paweł, Rola Wojciech, Rola Maciej «Krupczyk»13 persons on 13 hearths
the entry begins on f. 692 (the addition „z.c.d.” closes it), and the number of hearths is given by f. 693 in its first line: „(każdy po 1 d.) = 13 d.” Thirteen forenames, thirteen hearths — it agrees. A collective entry of the Krasusze type: the family surname „Rolów” stands once, at the end; the byname („Krupczyk”) only beside the man beside whom it stands on the card.
the same entry also names: Rola Franciszek, Rola Wojciech †, Rola Piotr, Rola Adam, Rola Antoni, Rola Jan †, Rola Jan, Rola Józef †, Rola Paweł, Rola Piotr †, Rola Paweł, Rola Wojciech13 persons on 13 hearths
the entry begins on f. 692 (the addition „z.c.d.” closes it), and the number of hearths is given by f. 693 in its first line: „(każdy po 1 d.) = 13 d.” Thirteen forenames, thirteen hearths — it agrees. A collective entry of the Krasusze type: the family surname „Rolów” stands once, at the end; the byname („Krupczyk”) only beside the man beside whom it stands on the card.
the same entry also names: Rola Franciszek, Rola Wojciech †, Rola Piotr, Rola Adam, Rola Antoni, Rola Jan †, Rola Jan, Rola Józef †, Rola Piotr †, Rola Paweł, Rola Wojciech, Rola Maciej «Krupczyk»13 persons on 13 hearths
the entry begins on f. 692 (the addition „z.c.d.” closes it), and the number of hearths is given by f. 693 in its first line: „(każdy po 1 d.) = 13 d.” Thirteen forenames, thirteen hearths — it agrees. A collective entry of the Krasusze type: the family surname „Rolów” stands once, at the end; the byname („Krupczyk”) only beside the man beside whom it stands on the card.
the same entry also names: Rola Franciszek, Rola Wojciech †, Rola Piotr, Rola Adam, Rola Antoni, Rola Jan †, Rola Jan, Rola Józef †, Rola Paweł, Rola Piotr †, Rola Wojciech, Rola Maciej «Krupczyk»13 persons on 13 hearths
the entry begins on f. 692 (the addition „z.c.d.” closes it), and the number of hearths is given by f. 693 in its first line: „(każdy po 1 d.) = 13 d.” Thirteen forenames, thirteen hearths — it agrees. A collective entry of the Krasusze type: the family surname „Rolów” stands once, at the end; the byname („Krupczyk”) only beside the man beside whom it stands on the card.
the same entry also names: Rola Franciszek, Rola Wojciech †, Rola Piotr, Rola Adam, Rola Antoni, Rola Jan †, Rola Jan, Rola Józef †, Rola Paweł, Rola Paweł, Rola Wojciech, Rola Maciej «Krupczyk»13 persons on 13 hearths
the entry begins on f. 692 (the addition „z.c.d.” closes it), and the number of hearths is given by f. 693 in its first line: „(każdy po 1 d.) = 13 d.” Thirteen forenames, thirteen hearths — it agrees. A collective entry of the Krasusze type: the family surname „Rolów” stands once, at the end; the byname („Krupczyk”) only beside the man beside whom it stands on the card.
the card writes the abbreviation „s. Piotra” — expanded to „suk[c]. Piotra” [reading uncertain]; it may just as well be „s[yn]a Piotra”
the same entry also names: Rola Franciszek, Rola Wojciech †, Rola Adam, Rola Antoni, Rola Jan †, Rola Jan, Rola Józef †, Rola Paweł, Rola Piotr †, Rola Paweł, Rola Wojciech, Rola Maciej «Krupczyk»13 persons on 13 hearths
the entry begins on f. 692 (the addition „z.c.d.” closes it), and the number of hearths is given by f. 693 in its first line: „(każdy po 1 d.) = 13 d.” Thirteen forenames, thirteen hearths — it agrees. A collective entry of the Krasusze type: the family surname „Rolów” stands once, at the end; the byname („Krupczyk”) only beside the man beside whom it stands on the card.
the same entry also names: Rola Franciszek, Rola Wojciech †, Rola Piotr, Rola Adam, Rola Antoni, Rola Jan †, Rola Jan, Rola Józef †, Rola Paweł, Rola Piotr †, Rola Paweł, Rola Maciej «Krupczyk»13 persons on 13 hearths
the entry begins on f. 692 (the addition „z.c.d.” closes it), and the number of hearths is given by f. 693 in its first line: „(każdy po 1 d.) = 13 d.” Thirteen forenames, thirteen hearths — it agrees. A collective entry of the Krasusze type: the family surname „Rolów” stands once, at the end; the byname („Krupczyk”) only beside the man beside whom it stands on the card.
the same entry also names: Rola Franciszek, Rola Piotr, Rola Adam, Rola Antoni, Rola Jan †, Rola Jan, Rola Józef †, Rola Paweł, Rola Piotr †, Rola Paweł, Rola Wojciech, Rola Maciej «Krupczyk»13 persons on 13 hearths
the entry begins on f. 692 (the addition „z.c.d.” closes it), and the number of hearths is given by f. 693 in its first line: „(każdy po 1 d.) = 13 d.” Thirteen forenames, thirteen hearths — it agrees. A collective entry of the Krasusze type: the family surname „Rolów” stands once, at the end; the byname („Krupczyk”) only beside the man beside whom it stands on the card.
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Jakób, Jastrzębski Jan3 persons on 3 hearths
T90 (f. 689, entry 3) names four in this family (Jakób, Jan, Franciszek and Wojciech) on 3 hearths, T94 (f. 691) the same four on 4 hearths — here three on 3 hearths. A discrepancy of the sources, not an error of reading.
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Franciszek, Jastrzębski Jan3 persons on 3 hearths
T90 (f. 689, entry 3) names four in this family (Jakób, Jan, Franciszek and Wojciech) on 3 hearths, T94 (f. 691) the same four on 4 hearths — here three on 3 hearths. A discrepancy of the sources, not an error of reading.
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Jakób, Jastrzębski Franciszek3 persons on 3 hearths
T90 (f. 689, entry 3) names four in this family (Jakób, Jan, Franciszek and Wojciech) on 3 hearths, T94 (f. 691) the same four on 4 hearths — here three on 3 hearths. A discrepancy of the sources, not an error of reading.
the same entry also names: Celiński Jędrzej, Celiński Tomasz, Celiński Jędrzej4 persons on 4 hearths
the entry begins on f. 693 (at the foot the addition „z.c.d.”), the figure „= 4 d.” is given by the last line of the same card. The forename is written „Jędrzeja” (= Andrzej) — I leave the form of the card. Two Jędrzejs: in T90 (f. 689, entry 4) distinguished as „syn Ludwika” and „syn Mateusza”.
the same entry also names: Celiński Tomasz, Celiński Jędrzej, Celiński Antoni4 persons on 4 hearths
the entry begins on f. 693 (at the foot the addition „z.c.d.”), the figure „= 4 d.” is given by the last line of the same card. The forename is written „Jędrzeja” (= Andrzej) — I leave the form of the card. Two Jędrzejs: in T90 (f. 689, entry 4) distinguished as „syn Ludwika” and „syn Mateusza”.
the same entry also names: Celiński Jędrzej, Celiński Tomasz, Celiński Antoni4 persons on 4 hearths
the entry begins on f. 693 (at the foot the addition „z.c.d.”), the figure „= 4 d.” is given by the last line of the same card. The forename is written „Jędrzeja” (= Andrzej) — I leave the form of the card. Two Jędrzejs: in T90 (f. 689, entry 4) distinguished as „syn Ludwika” and „syn Mateusza”.
the same entry also names: Celiński Jędrzej, Celiński Jędrzej, Celiński Antoni4 persons on 4 hearths
the entry begins on f. 693 (at the foot the addition „z.c.d.”), the figure „= 4 d.” is given by the last line of the same card. The forename is written „Jędrzeja” (= Andrzej) — I leave the form of the card. Two Jędrzejs: in T90 (f. 689, entry 4) distinguished as „syn Ludwika” and „syn Mateusza”.
the same entry also names: Borkowski Jakób2 persons on 2 hearths
the same entry also names: Borkowski Antoni2 persons on 2 hearths
the same entry also names: Skrzyszewski Szymon2 persons on 2 hearths
the same entry also names: Skrzyszewski Jan2 persons on 2 hearths
the same entry also names: Sulej Tomasz, Sulej Szczepan3 persons on 3 hearths
the surname on the card in the genitive plural „Sulejów”; Bonawentura is a man
the same entry also names: Sulej Bonawentura, Sulej Tomasz3 persons on 3 hearths
the surname on the card in the genitive plural „Sulejów”; Bonawentura is a man
the same entry also names: Sulej Bonawentura, Sulej Szczepan3 persons on 3 hearths
the surname on the card in the genitive plural „Sulejów”; Bonawentura is a man
the same entry also names: Tchórzewski Wojciech2 persons on 2 hearths
A WOMAN: „Marjanny” — a feminine genitive, the forename given. In a collective entry the surname stands once, in the masculine plural („Tchórzewskich”), and so I record it in the masculine form, in accordance with the rule of the brief; the gender is recognized by the forename. The spelling of the forename from the card („Marjanna”) is kept.
the same entry also names: Tchórzewski Marjanna2 persons on 2 hearths
A WOMAN: „Marjanny” — a feminine genitive, the forename given. In a collective entry the surname stands once, in the masculine plural („Tchórzewskich”), and so I record it in the masculine form, in accordance with the rule of the brief; the gender is recognized by the forename. The spelling of the forename from the card („Marjanna”) is kept.
1789 T₀89List of possessors of holdings of 1789
The word „propinacja” is read with certainty. The name of the second place — „Borzymach Guteciach” — [reading uncertain]: the first element is certainly Borzymy (a village of the same parish), the second element cannot, after one magnification, be decided between „Guteciach” and „Gutkach”. I record unchanged what can be seen. The same person stands in T₉₄, entry 1 (without the office), and in T89, entry 1, and in O83 (IX) as „Urban Mystowski, podwojewodzi łukowski”.
The last line of the card; without an annotation, like entry 1 — the addition about the sowing appears only beside entry 3, on the next card.
A second Franciszek Rola in the same list (cf. entry 6); the card distinguishes them by nothing.
The last line of card 10.
The addition is set down here in its full wording; beside the next twelve entries of card 10 the card index repeats it with the word „podobniż”.
The addition is set horizontally, right beside the line. The same Piotr Rola as in entry 14 on the preceding card, or another — the card does not resolve it. From the next entry on, a brace takes the place of the addition.
Covered by the brace „nie wysiewają 10 korcy”, which runs vertically along the right-hand edge of the column through entries 17–29 and there takes the place of an addition beside each line separately.
Covered by the brace „nie wysiewają 10 korcy” (entries 17–29).
Covered by the brace „nie wysiewają 10 korcy” (entries 17–29).
Covered by the brace „nie wysiewają 10 korcy” (entries 17–29).
Covered by the brace „nie wysiewają 10 korcy” (entries 17–29).
Covered by the brace „nie wysiewają 10 korcy” (entries 17–29).
Covered by the brace „nie wysiewają 10 korcy” (entries 17–29). The writing „Suleya”; the nominative „Sulej”, as in T₉₄, entry 6 („Sulejów”).
Covered by the brace „nie wysiewają 10 korcy” (entries 17–29).
Covered by the brace „nie wysiewają 10 korcy” (entries 17–29).
Covered by the brace „nie wysiewają 10 korcy” (entries 17–29).
Covered by the brace „nie wysiewają 10 korcy” (entries 17–29).
Covered by the brace „nie wysiewają 10 korcy” (entries 17–29).
The last entry of the list and the last line of card 11; covered by the brace „nie wysiewają 10 korcy” (entries 17–29).
1790 T90Hearth tax register 1790
the card writes the office in the form „Podwojewodzkiego Ziemi Łukow.”; T89 and O83 for the same village write „podwojewodziego” / „podwojewodzi”
the same entry also names: Skrzyszewski Marcin2 persons on 4 hearths
on this card the surname is written „Skryszewskich”; T89 (f. 693) writes „Skrzyszewskich”, T94 (f. 690) „Skrzyszowskich”
the same entry also names: Skrzyszewski Franciszek2 persons on 4 hearths
on this card the surname is written „Skryszewskich”; T89 (f. 693) writes „Skrzyszewskich”, T94 (f. 690) „Skrzyszowskich”
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Jakób, Jastrzębski Jan, Jastrzębski Wojciech4 persons on 3 hearths
FOUR forenames, THREE hearths. The figure 3 is certain: the sum of all the entries of T90 gives exactly 55, that is the „Razem dymów 55” of f. 690. The card does not explain the discrepancy; the semicolon and the dash after „Jana” suggest that „Franciszek i Wojciech” stand on one hearth, but that is interpretation, not the text of the card. For comparison T94 (f. 690) gives the same four persons 4 hearths, and T89 (f. 693, entry 11) names only three Jastrzębskis on 3 hearths. The marker /n. pł. of./ refers to the whole group.
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Jan, Jastrzębski Franciszek, Jastrzębski Wojciech4 persons on 3 hearths
FOUR forenames, THREE hearths. The figure 3 is certain: the sum of all the entries of T90 gives exactly 55, that is the „Razem dymów 55” of f. 690. The card does not explain the discrepancy; the semicolon and the dash after „Jana” suggest that „Franciszek i Wojciech” stand on one hearth, but that is interpretation, not the text of the card. For comparison T94 (f. 690) gives the same four persons 4 hearths, and T89 (f. 693, entry 11) names only three Jastrzębskis on 3 hearths. The marker /n. pł. of./ refers to the whole group.
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Jakób, Jastrzębski Franciszek, Jastrzębski Wojciech4 persons on 3 hearths
FOUR forenames, THREE hearths. The figure 3 is certain: the sum of all the entries of T90 gives exactly 55, that is the „Razem dymów 55” of f. 690. The card does not explain the discrepancy; the semicolon and the dash after „Jana” suggest that „Franciszek i Wojciech” stand on one hearth, but that is interpretation, not the text of the card. For comparison T94 (f. 690) gives the same four persons 4 hearths, and T89 (f. 693, entry 11) names only three Jastrzębskis on 3 hearths. The marker /n. pł. of./ refers to the whole group.
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Jakób, Jastrzębski Jan, Jastrzębski Franciszek4 persons on 3 hearths
FOUR forenames, THREE hearths. The figure 3 is certain: the sum of all the entries of T90 gives exactly 55, that is the „Razem dymów 55” of f. 690. The card does not explain the discrepancy; the semicolon and the dash after „Jana” suggest that „Franciszek i Wojciech” stand on one hearth, but that is interpretation, not the text of the card. For comparison T94 (f. 690) gives the same four persons 4 hearths, and T89 (f. 693, entry 11) names only three Jastrzębskis on 3 hearths. The marker /n. pł. of./ refers to the whole group.
the same entry also names: Celiński Tomasz, Celiński Andrzej, Celiński Antoni4 persons on 4 hearths
the marker /n. pł. of./ refers to the whole group
the card: „Andrzeja syna Ludwika”
the same entry also names: Celiński Tomasz, Celiński Andrzej, Celiński Antoni4 persons on 4 hearths
the marker /n. pł. of./ refers to the whole group
the card: „Andrzeja syna Mateusza”
the same entry also names: Celiński Tomasz, Celiński Andrzej, Celiński Andrzej4 persons on 4 hearths
the marker /n. pł. of./ refers to the whole group
the same entry also names: Celiński Andrzej, Celiński Andrzej, Celiński Antoni4 persons on 4 hearths
the marker /n. pł. of./ refers to the whole group
the same entry also names: Nurzyński Paweł, Nurzyński Walenty, Nurzyński Józef †, Nurzyński Szymon, Nurzyński Piotr6 persons on 6 hearths
„sukces.” (above the comma before „Józefa”) and „Szymona” (between „Jana” and „Piotra”) are added above the line; below the entry there shows a struck-out, unread beginning of a line marked „6)”. The marker /n. pł. of./ refers to the whole group.
the same entry also names: Nurzyński Paweł, Nurzyński Walenty, Nurzyński Jan, Nurzyński Szymon, Nurzyński Piotr6 persons on 6 hearths
„sukces.” (above the comma before „Józefa”) and „Szymona” (between „Jana” and „Piotra”) are added above the line; below the entry there shows a struck-out, unread beginning of a line marked „6)”. The marker /n. pł. of./ refers to the whole group.
the same entry also names: Nurzyński Walenty, Nurzyński Józef †, Nurzyński Jan, Nurzyński Szymon, Nurzyński Piotr6 persons on 6 hearths
„sukces.” (above the comma before „Józefa”) and „Szymona” (between „Jana” and „Piotra”) are added above the line; below the entry there shows a struck-out, unread beginning of a line marked „6)”. The marker /n. pł. of./ refers to the whole group.
the same entry also names: Nurzyński Paweł, Nurzyński Walenty, Nurzyński Józef †, Nurzyński Jan, Nurzyński Szymon6 persons on 6 hearths
„sukces.” (above the comma before „Józefa”) and „Szymona” (between „Jana” and „Piotra”) are added above the line; below the entry there shows a struck-out, unread beginning of a line marked „6)”. The marker /n. pł. of./ refers to the whole group.
the same entry also names: Nurzyński Paweł, Nurzyński Walenty, Nurzyński Józef †, Nurzyński Jan, Nurzyński Piotr6 persons on 6 hearths
„sukces.” (above the comma before „Józefa”) and „Szymona” (between „Jana” and „Piotra”) are added above the line; below the entry there shows a struck-out, unread beginning of a line marked „6)”. The marker /n. pł. of./ refers to the whole group.
the same entry also names: Nurzyński Paweł, Nurzyński Józef †, Nurzyński Jan, Nurzyński Szymon, Nurzyński Piotr6 persons on 6 hearths
„sukces.” (above the comma before „Józefa”) and „Szymona” (between „Jana” and „Piotra”) are added above the line; below the entry there shows a struck-out, unread beginning of a line marked „6)”. The marker /n. pł. of./ refers to the whole group.
the same entry also names: Sulej Tomasz, Sulej Szczepan3 persons on 3 hearths
the surname on the card in the genitive plural „Sulejów”; Bonawentura is a man. The marker /n. pł. of./ refers to the whole group.
the same entry also names: Sulej Tomasz, Sulej Bonawentura3 persons on 3 hearths
the surname on the card in the genitive plural „Sulejów”; Bonawentura is a man. The marker /n. pł. of./ refers to the whole group.
the same entry also names: Sulej Bonawentura, Sulej Szczepan3 persons on 3 hearths
the surname on the card in the genitive plural „Sulejów”; Bonawentura is a man. The marker /n. pł. of./ refers to the whole group.
the same entry also names: Rola Jan «Fladrik», Rola Andrzej «Bujanek», Rola Paweł «Bujanek», Rola Franciszek, Rola Piotr «Kasprzyk», Rola Jan «Kasprzyk» †, Rola Maciej «Krupczyk», Rola Jan «Żakowicz», Rola Wojciech, Rola Jakób, Rola Adam, Rola Maciej, Rola Antoni «Żakowicz», Rola Wojciech «Żakowicz» †, Rola Jakób «Żakowicz» †16 persons on 13 hearths
SIXTEEN persons, THIRTEEN hearths. The figure 13 is certain — the sum of all the entries of T90 gives exactly 55, that is the „Razem dymów 55” of f. 690. The card does not explain the discrepancy; most probably the four brothers („Wojciecha, Jakóba, Adama i Macieja synów Adama”) stand on a common hearth, but that is interpretation, not the text of the card. A collective entry of the Krasusze type: the family surname („Rolów”) stands once, at the end, and Fladrik, Bujanek, Kasprzyk, Krupczyk, Żakowicz, Szymkowicz are bynames — just as in T75 on f. 686 („… — Rolów. po 1 dymie - dymów 16”). Above the line, between „sukces. Jana Kasprzyka” and „Macieja Krupczyka”, stands a marker written in above and struck through, looking like „/n. płacą of./” [reading uncertain]; in the main line, after „Macieja Krupczyka”, stands a plain „/pł. of./” and that is the one I record. The marker /n. pł. of./ before „Rolów” refers to the whole group. The addition „(synów Adama)” stands in a frame below the line, joined by a stroke to the place after „i Jakóba”.
A WOMAN without a forename of her own. In the right-hand margin of the card there is added, in two lines, „Stanisława / Szymkowicza;”, joined by a large brace to the word „Siostra” in the main line; the point of insertion of the addition [reading uncertain] — hence the byname „Szymkowicz” beside her, and not beside anyone else.
the same entry also names: Rola Jan «Fladrik», Rola Andrzej «Bujanek», Rola Paweł «Bujanek», Rola Franciszek, Rola Piotr «Kasprzyk», Rola Jan «Kasprzyk» †, Rola Maciej «Krupczyk», Rola Jan «Żakowicz», Rola Wojciech, Rola Jakób, Rola Maciej, Rola Antoni «Żakowicz», Rola Wojciech «Żakowicz» †, Rola Jakób «Żakowicz» †, Rola «Szymkowicz»16 persons on 13 hearths
SIXTEEN persons, THIRTEEN hearths. The figure 13 is certain — the sum of all the entries of T90 gives exactly 55, that is the „Razem dymów 55” of f. 690. The card does not explain the discrepancy; most probably the four brothers („Wojciecha, Jakóba, Adama i Macieja synów Adama”) stand on a common hearth, but that is interpretation, not the text of the card. A collective entry of the Krasusze type: the family surname („Rolów”) stands once, at the end, and Fladrik, Bujanek, Kasprzyk, Krupczyk, Żakowicz, Szymkowicz are bynames — just as in T75 on f. 686 („… — Rolów. po 1 dymie - dymów 16”). Above the line, between „sukces. Jana Kasprzyka” and „Macieja Krupczyka”, stands a marker written in above and struck through, looking like „/n. płacą of./” [reading uncertain]; in the main line, after „Macieja Krupczyka”, stands a plain „/pł. of./” and that is the one I record. The marker /n. pł. of./ before „Rolów” refers to the whole group. The addition „(synów Adama)” stands in a frame below the line, joined by a stroke to the place after „i Jakóba”.
the card: one of the „synów Pawła”, corrected by the addition in a frame „(synów Adama)”
the same entry also names: Rola Jan «Fladrik», Rola Paweł «Bujanek», Rola Franciszek, Rola Piotr «Kasprzyk», Rola Jan «Kasprzyk» †, Rola Maciej «Krupczyk», Rola Jan «Żakowicz», Rola Wojciech, Rola Jakób, Rola Adam, Rola Maciej, Rola Antoni «Żakowicz», Rola Wojciech «Żakowicz» †, Rola Jakób «Żakowicz» †, Rola «Szymkowicz»16 persons on 13 hearths
SIXTEEN persons, THIRTEEN hearths. The figure 13 is certain — the sum of all the entries of T90 gives exactly 55, that is the „Razem dymów 55” of f. 690. The card does not explain the discrepancy; most probably the four brothers („Wojciecha, Jakóba, Adama i Macieja synów Adama”) stand on a common hearth, but that is interpretation, not the text of the card. A collective entry of the Krasusze type: the family surname („Rolów”) stands once, at the end, and Fladrik, Bujanek, Kasprzyk, Krupczyk, Żakowicz, Szymkowicz are bynames — just as in T75 on f. 686 („… — Rolów. po 1 dymie - dymów 16”). Above the line, between „sukces. Jana Kasprzyka” and „Macieja Krupczyka”, stands a marker written in above and struck through, looking like „/n. płacą of./” [reading uncertain]; in the main line, after „Macieja Krupczyka”, stands a plain „/pł. of./” and that is the one I record. The marker /n. pł. of./ before „Rolów” refers to the whole group. The addition „(synów Adama)” stands in a frame below the line, joined by a stroke to the place after „i Jakóba”.
the card: „Andrzeja Bujanka syna Piotra Bujanka”
the same entry also names: Rola Jan «Fladrik», Rola Andrzej «Bujanek», Rola Paweł «Bujanek», Rola Franciszek, Rola Piotr «Kasprzyk», Rola Jan «Kasprzyk» †, Rola Maciej «Krupczyk», Rola Jan «Żakowicz», Rola Wojciech, Rola Jakób, Rola Adam, Rola Maciej, Rola Wojciech «Żakowicz» †, Rola Jakób «Żakowicz» †, Rola «Szymkowicz»16 persons on 13 hearths
SIXTEEN persons, THIRTEEN hearths. The figure 13 is certain — the sum of all the entries of T90 gives exactly 55, that is the „Razem dymów 55” of f. 690. The card does not explain the discrepancy; most probably the four brothers („Wojciecha, Jakóba, Adama i Macieja synów Adama”) stand on a common hearth, but that is interpretation, not the text of the card. A collective entry of the Krasusze type: the family surname („Rolów”) stands once, at the end, and Fladrik, Bujanek, Kasprzyk, Krupczyk, Żakowicz, Szymkowicz are bynames — just as in T75 on f. 686 („… — Rolów. po 1 dymie - dymów 16”). Above the line, between „sukces. Jana Kasprzyka” and „Macieja Krupczyka”, stands a marker written in above and struck through, looking like „/n. płacą of./” [reading uncertain]; in the main line, after „Macieja Krupczyka”, stands a plain „/pł. of./” and that is the one I record. The marker /n. pł. of./ before „Rolów” refers to the whole group. The addition „(synów Adama)” stands in a frame below the line, joined by a stroke to the place after „i Jakóba”.
the same entry also names: Rola Jan «Fladrik», Rola Andrzej «Bujanek», Rola Paweł «Bujanek», Rola Piotr «Kasprzyk», Rola Jan «Kasprzyk» †, Rola Maciej «Krupczyk», Rola Jan «Żakowicz», Rola Wojciech, Rola Jakób, Rola Adam, Rola Maciej, Rola Antoni «Żakowicz», Rola Wojciech «Żakowicz» †, Rola Jakób «Żakowicz» †, Rola «Szymkowicz»16 persons on 13 hearths
SIXTEEN persons, THIRTEEN hearths. The figure 13 is certain — the sum of all the entries of T90 gives exactly 55, that is the „Razem dymów 55” of f. 690. The card does not explain the discrepancy; most probably the four brothers („Wojciecha, Jakóba, Adama i Macieja synów Adama”) stand on a common hearth, but that is interpretation, not the text of the card. A collective entry of the Krasusze type: the family surname („Rolów”) stands once, at the end, and Fladrik, Bujanek, Kasprzyk, Krupczyk, Żakowicz, Szymkowicz are bynames — just as in T75 on f. 686 („… — Rolów. po 1 dymie - dymów 16”). Above the line, between „sukces. Jana Kasprzyka” and „Macieja Krupczyka”, stands a marker written in above and struck through, looking like „/n. płacą of./” [reading uncertain]; in the main line, after „Macieja Krupczyka”, stands a plain „/pł. of./” and that is the one I record. The marker /n. pł. of./ before „Rolów” refers to the whole group. The addition „(synów Adama)” stands in a frame below the line, joined by a stroke to the place after „i Jakóba”.
the card: „Franciszka syna Pawła” — it gives no byname
the same entry also names: Rola Jan «Fladrik», Rola Andrzej «Bujanek», Rola Paweł «Bujanek», Rola Franciszek, Rola Piotr «Kasprzyk», Rola Jan «Kasprzyk» †, Rola Maciej «Krupczyk», Rola Jan «Żakowicz», Rola Wojciech, Rola Adam, Rola Maciej, Rola Antoni «Żakowicz», Rola Wojciech «Żakowicz» †, Rola Jakób «Żakowicz» †, Rola «Szymkowicz»16 persons on 13 hearths
SIXTEEN persons, THIRTEEN hearths. The figure 13 is certain — the sum of all the entries of T90 gives exactly 55, that is the „Razem dymów 55” of f. 690. The card does not explain the discrepancy; most probably the four brothers („Wojciecha, Jakóba, Adama i Macieja synów Adama”) stand on a common hearth, but that is interpretation, not the text of the card. A collective entry of the Krasusze type: the family surname („Rolów”) stands once, at the end, and Fladrik, Bujanek, Kasprzyk, Krupczyk, Żakowicz, Szymkowicz are bynames — just as in T75 on f. 686 („… — Rolów. po 1 dymie - dymów 16”). Above the line, between „sukces. Jana Kasprzyka” and „Macieja Krupczyka”, stands a marker written in above and struck through, looking like „/n. płacą of./” [reading uncertain]; in the main line, after „Macieja Krupczyka”, stands a plain „/pł. of./” and that is the one I record. The marker /n. pł. of./ before „Rolów” refers to the whole group. The addition „(synów Adama)” stands in a frame below the line, joined by a stroke to the place after „i Jakóba”.
the card: one of the „synów Pawła”, corrected by the addition in a frame „(synów Adama)”
the same entry also names: Rola Jan «Fladrik», Rola Andrzej «Bujanek», Rola Paweł «Bujanek», Rola Franciszek, Rola Piotr «Kasprzyk», Rola Jan «Kasprzyk» †, Rola Maciej «Krupczyk», Rola Jan «Żakowicz», Rola Wojciech, Rola Jakób, Rola Adam, Rola Maciej, Rola Antoni «Żakowicz», Rola Wojciech «Żakowicz» †, Rola «Szymkowicz»16 persons on 13 hearths
SIXTEEN persons, THIRTEEN hearths. The figure 13 is certain — the sum of all the entries of T90 gives exactly 55, that is the „Razem dymów 55” of f. 690. The card does not explain the discrepancy; most probably the four brothers („Wojciecha, Jakóba, Adama i Macieja synów Adama”) stand on a common hearth, but that is interpretation, not the text of the card. A collective entry of the Krasusze type: the family surname („Rolów”) stands once, at the end, and Fladrik, Bujanek, Kasprzyk, Krupczyk, Żakowicz, Szymkowicz are bynames — just as in T75 on f. 686 („… — Rolów. po 1 dymie - dymów 16”). Above the line, between „sukces. Jana Kasprzyka” and „Macieja Krupczyka”, stands a marker written in above and struck through, looking like „/n. płacą of./” [reading uncertain]; in the main line, after „Macieja Krupczyka”, stands a plain „/pł. of./” and that is the one I record. The marker /n. pł. of./ before „Rolów” refers to the whole group. The addition „(synów Adama)” stands in a frame below the line, joined by a stroke to the place after „i Jakóba”.
the same entry also names: Rola Andrzej «Bujanek», Rola Paweł «Bujanek», Rola Franciszek, Rola Piotr «Kasprzyk», Rola Jan «Kasprzyk» †, Rola Maciej «Krupczyk», Rola Jan «Żakowicz», Rola Wojciech, Rola Jakób, Rola Adam, Rola Maciej, Rola Antoni «Żakowicz», Rola Wojciech «Żakowicz» †, Rola Jakób «Żakowicz» †, Rola «Szymkowicz»16 persons on 13 hearths
SIXTEEN persons, THIRTEEN hearths. The figure 13 is certain — the sum of all the entries of T90 gives exactly 55, that is the „Razem dymów 55” of f. 690. The card does not explain the discrepancy; most probably the four brothers („Wojciecha, Jakóba, Adama i Macieja synów Adama”) stand on a common hearth, but that is interpretation, not the text of the card. A collective entry of the Krasusze type: the family surname („Rolów”) stands once, at the end, and Fladrik, Bujanek, Kasprzyk, Krupczyk, Żakowicz, Szymkowicz are bynames — just as in T75 on f. 686 („… — Rolów. po 1 dymie - dymów 16”). Above the line, between „sukces. Jana Kasprzyka” and „Macieja Krupczyka”, stands a marker written in above and struck through, looking like „/n. płacą of./” [reading uncertain]; in the main line, after „Macieja Krupczyka”, stands a plain „/pł. of./” and that is the one I record. The marker /n. pł. of./ before „Rolów” refers to the whole group. The addition „(synów Adama)” stands in a frame below the line, joined by a stroke to the place after „i Jakóba”.
the same entry also names: Rola Jan «Fladrik», Rola Andrzej «Bujanek», Rola Paweł «Bujanek», Rola Franciszek, Rola Piotr «Kasprzyk», Rola Maciej «Krupczyk», Rola Jan «Żakowicz», Rola Wojciech, Rola Jakób, Rola Adam, Rola Maciej, Rola Antoni «Żakowicz», Rola Wojciech «Żakowicz» †, Rola Jakób «Żakowicz» †, Rola «Szymkowicz»16 persons on 13 hearths
SIXTEEN persons, THIRTEEN hearths. The figure 13 is certain — the sum of all the entries of T90 gives exactly 55, that is the „Razem dymów 55” of f. 690. The card does not explain the discrepancy; most probably the four brothers („Wojciecha, Jakóba, Adama i Macieja synów Adama”) stand on a common hearth, but that is interpretation, not the text of the card. A collective entry of the Krasusze type: the family surname („Rolów”) stands once, at the end, and Fladrik, Bujanek, Kasprzyk, Krupczyk, Żakowicz, Szymkowicz are bynames — just as in T75 on f. 686 („… — Rolów. po 1 dymie - dymów 16”). Above the line, between „sukces. Jana Kasprzyka” and „Macieja Krupczyka”, stands a marker written in above and struck through, looking like „/n. płacą of./” [reading uncertain]; in the main line, after „Macieja Krupczyka”, stands a plain „/pł. of./” and that is the one I record. The marker /n. pł. of./ before „Rolów” refers to the whole group. The addition „(synów Adama)” stands in a frame below the line, joined by a stroke to the place after „i Jakóba”.
the same entry also names: Rola Jan «Fladrik», Rola Andrzej «Bujanek», Rola Paweł «Bujanek», Rola Franciszek, Rola Piotr «Kasprzyk», Rola Jan «Kasprzyk» †, Rola Maciej «Krupczyk», Rola Wojciech, Rola Jakób, Rola Adam, Rola Maciej, Rola Antoni «Żakowicz», Rola Wojciech «Żakowicz» †, Rola Jakób «Żakowicz» †, Rola «Szymkowicz»16 persons on 13 hearths
SIXTEEN persons, THIRTEEN hearths. The figure 13 is certain — the sum of all the entries of T90 gives exactly 55, that is the „Razem dymów 55” of f. 690. The card does not explain the discrepancy; most probably the four brothers („Wojciecha, Jakóba, Adama i Macieja synów Adama”) stand on a common hearth, but that is interpretation, not the text of the card. A collective entry of the Krasusze type: the family surname („Rolów”) stands once, at the end, and Fladrik, Bujanek, Kasprzyk, Krupczyk, Żakowicz, Szymkowicz are bynames — just as in T75 on f. 686 („… — Rolów. po 1 dymie - dymów 16”). Above the line, between „sukces. Jana Kasprzyka” and „Macieja Krupczyka”, stands a marker written in above and struck through, looking like „/n. płacą of./” [reading uncertain]; in the main line, after „Macieja Krupczyka”, stands a plain „/pł. of./” and that is the one I record. The marker /n. pł. of./ before „Rolów” refers to the whole group. The addition „(synów Adama)” stands in a frame below the line, joined by a stroke to the place after „i Jakóba”.
the card: „Jana Żakowicza syna Pawła”; after „Pawła” the word „Roli” is struck through
the same entry also names: Rola Jan «Fladrik», Rola Andrzej «Bujanek», Rola Paweł «Bujanek», Rola Franciszek, Rola Piotr «Kasprzyk», Rola Jan «Kasprzyk» †, Rola Maciej «Krupczyk», Rola Jan «Żakowicz», Rola Wojciech, Rola Jakób, Rola Adam, Rola Antoni «Żakowicz», Rola Wojciech «Żakowicz» †, Rola Jakób «Żakowicz» †, Rola «Szymkowicz»16 persons on 13 hearths
SIXTEEN persons, THIRTEEN hearths. The figure 13 is certain — the sum of all the entries of T90 gives exactly 55, that is the „Razem dymów 55” of f. 690. The card does not explain the discrepancy; most probably the four brothers („Wojciecha, Jakóba, Adama i Macieja synów Adama”) stand on a common hearth, but that is interpretation, not the text of the card. A collective entry of the Krasusze type: the family surname („Rolów”) stands once, at the end, and Fladrik, Bujanek, Kasprzyk, Krupczyk, Żakowicz, Szymkowicz are bynames — just as in T75 on f. 686 („… — Rolów. po 1 dymie - dymów 16”). Above the line, between „sukces. Jana Kasprzyka” and „Macieja Krupczyka”, stands a marker written in above and struck through, looking like „/n. płacą of./” [reading uncertain]; in the main line, after „Macieja Krupczyka”, stands a plain „/pł. of./” and that is the one I record. The marker /n. pł. of./ before „Rolów” refers to the whole group. The addition „(synów Adama)” stands in a frame below the line, joined by a stroke to the place after „i Jakóba”.
the card: one of the „synów Pawła”, corrected by the addition in a frame „(synów Adama)”
the same entry also names: Rola Jan «Fladrik», Rola Andrzej «Bujanek», Rola Paweł «Bujanek», Rola Franciszek, Rola Piotr «Kasprzyk», Rola Jan «Kasprzyk» †, Rola Jan «Żakowicz», Rola Wojciech, Rola Jakób, Rola Adam, Rola Maciej, Rola Antoni «Żakowicz», Rola Wojciech «Żakowicz» †, Rola Jakób «Żakowicz» †, Rola «Szymkowicz»16 persons on 13 hearths
SIXTEEN persons, THIRTEEN hearths. The figure 13 is certain — the sum of all the entries of T90 gives exactly 55, that is the „Razem dymów 55” of f. 690. The card does not explain the discrepancy; most probably the four brothers („Wojciecha, Jakóba, Adama i Macieja synów Adama”) stand on a common hearth, but that is interpretation, not the text of the card. A collective entry of the Krasusze type: the family surname („Rolów”) stands once, at the end, and Fladrik, Bujanek, Kasprzyk, Krupczyk, Żakowicz, Szymkowicz are bynames — just as in T75 on f. 686 („… — Rolów. po 1 dymie - dymów 16”). Above the line, between „sukces. Jana Kasprzyka” and „Macieja Krupczyka”, stands a marker written in above and struck through, looking like „/n. płacą of./” [reading uncertain]; in the main line, after „Macieja Krupczyka”, stands a plain „/pł. of./” and that is the one I record. The marker /n. pł. of./ before „Rolów” refers to the whole group. The addition „(synów Adama)” stands in a frame below the line, joined by a stroke to the place after „i Jakóba”.
the same entry also names: Rola Jan «Fladrik», Rola Andrzej «Bujanek», Rola Franciszek, Rola Piotr «Kasprzyk», Rola Jan «Kasprzyk» †, Rola Maciej «Krupczyk», Rola Jan «Żakowicz», Rola Wojciech, Rola Jakób, Rola Adam, Rola Maciej, Rola Antoni «Żakowicz», Rola Wojciech «Żakowicz» †, Rola Jakób «Żakowicz» †, Rola «Szymkowicz»16 persons on 13 hearths
SIXTEEN persons, THIRTEEN hearths. The figure 13 is certain — the sum of all the entries of T90 gives exactly 55, that is the „Razem dymów 55” of f. 690. The card does not explain the discrepancy; most probably the four brothers („Wojciecha, Jakóba, Adama i Macieja synów Adama”) stand on a common hearth, but that is interpretation, not the text of the card. A collective entry of the Krasusze type: the family surname („Rolów”) stands once, at the end, and Fladrik, Bujanek, Kasprzyk, Krupczyk, Żakowicz, Szymkowicz are bynames — just as in T75 on f. 686 („… — Rolów. po 1 dymie - dymów 16”). Above the line, between „sukces. Jana Kasprzyka” and „Macieja Krupczyka”, stands a marker written in above and struck through, looking like „/n. płacą of./” [reading uncertain]; in the main line, after „Macieja Krupczyka”, stands a plain „/pł. of./” and that is the one I record. The marker /n. pł. of./ before „Rolów” refers to the whole group. The addition „(synów Adama)” stands in a frame below the line, joined by a stroke to the place after „i Jakóba”.
the same entry also names: Rola Jan «Fladrik», Rola Andrzej «Bujanek», Rola Paweł «Bujanek», Rola Franciszek, Rola Jan «Kasprzyk» †, Rola Maciej «Krupczyk», Rola Jan «Żakowicz», Rola Wojciech, Rola Jakób, Rola Adam, Rola Maciej, Rola Antoni «Żakowicz», Rola Wojciech «Żakowicz» †, Rola Jakób «Żakowicz» †, Rola «Szymkowicz»16 persons on 13 hearths
SIXTEEN persons, THIRTEEN hearths. The figure 13 is certain — the sum of all the entries of T90 gives exactly 55, that is the „Razem dymów 55” of f. 690. The card does not explain the discrepancy; most probably the four brothers („Wojciecha, Jakóba, Adama i Macieja synów Adama”) stand on a common hearth, but that is interpretation, not the text of the card. A collective entry of the Krasusze type: the family surname („Rolów”) stands once, at the end, and Fladrik, Bujanek, Kasprzyk, Krupczyk, Żakowicz, Szymkowicz are bynames — just as in T75 on f. 686 („… — Rolów. po 1 dymie - dymów 16”). Above the line, between „sukces. Jana Kasprzyka” and „Macieja Krupczyka”, stands a marker written in above and struck through, looking like „/n. płacą of./” [reading uncertain]; in the main line, after „Macieja Krupczyka”, stands a plain „/pł. of./” and that is the one I record. The marker /n. pł. of./ before „Rolów” refers to the whole group. The addition „(synów Adama)” stands in a frame below the line, joined by a stroke to the place after „i Jakóba”.
the same entry also names: Rola Jan «Fladrik», Rola Andrzej «Bujanek», Rola Paweł «Bujanek», Rola Franciszek, Rola Piotr «Kasprzyk», Rola Jan «Kasprzyk» †, Rola Maciej «Krupczyk», Rola Jan «Żakowicz», Rola Jakób, Rola Adam, Rola Maciej, Rola Antoni «Żakowicz», Rola Wojciech «Żakowicz» †, Rola Jakób «Żakowicz» †, Rola «Szymkowicz»16 persons on 13 hearths
SIXTEEN persons, THIRTEEN hearths. The figure 13 is certain — the sum of all the entries of T90 gives exactly 55, that is the „Razem dymów 55” of f. 690. The card does not explain the discrepancy; most probably the four brothers („Wojciecha, Jakóba, Adama i Macieja synów Adama”) stand on a common hearth, but that is interpretation, not the text of the card. A collective entry of the Krasusze type: the family surname („Rolów”) stands once, at the end, and Fladrik, Bujanek, Kasprzyk, Krupczyk, Żakowicz, Szymkowicz are bynames — just as in T75 on f. 686 („… — Rolów. po 1 dymie - dymów 16”). Above the line, between „sukces. Jana Kasprzyka” and „Macieja Krupczyka”, stands a marker written in above and struck through, looking like „/n. płacą of./” [reading uncertain]; in the main line, after „Macieja Krupczyka”, stands a plain „/pł. of./” and that is the one I record. The marker /n. pł. of./ before „Rolów” refers to the whole group. The addition „(synów Adama)” stands in a frame below the line, joined by a stroke to the place after „i Jakóba”.
the card: one of the „synów Pawła”, corrected by the addition in a frame „(synów Adama)”
the same entry also names: Rola Jan «Fladrik», Rola Andrzej «Bujanek», Rola Paweł «Bujanek», Rola Franciszek, Rola Piotr «Kasprzyk», Rola Jan «Kasprzyk» †, Rola Maciej «Krupczyk», Rola Jan «Żakowicz», Rola Wojciech, Rola Jakób, Rola Adam, Rola Maciej, Rola Antoni «Żakowicz», Rola Jakób «Żakowicz» †, Rola «Szymkowicz»16 persons on 13 hearths
SIXTEEN persons, THIRTEEN hearths. The figure 13 is certain — the sum of all the entries of T90 gives exactly 55, that is the „Razem dymów 55” of f. 690. The card does not explain the discrepancy; most probably the four brothers („Wojciecha, Jakóba, Adama i Macieja synów Adama”) stand on a common hearth, but that is interpretation, not the text of the card. A collective entry of the Krasusze type: the family surname („Rolów”) stands once, at the end, and Fladrik, Bujanek, Kasprzyk, Krupczyk, Żakowicz, Szymkowicz are bynames — just as in T75 on f. 686 („… — Rolów. po 1 dymie - dymów 16”). Above the line, between „sukces. Jana Kasprzyka” and „Macieja Krupczyka”, stands a marker written in above and struck through, looking like „/n. płacą of./” [reading uncertain]; in the main line, after „Macieja Krupczyka”, stands a plain „/pł. of./” and that is the one I record. The marker /n. pł. of./ before „Rolów” refers to the whole group. The addition „(synów Adama)” stands in a frame below the line, joined by a stroke to the place after „i Jakóba”.
the same entry also names: Tchórzewski Mateusz, Tchórzewski Wojciech3 persons on 3 hearths
THE NUMBERING OF T90 JUMPS from 7) to 14) — between them there is no entry on the cards, and the sum of the entries recorded comes to exactly 55, that is the „Razem dymów 55” of the same card. This is not a failure of reading: entries 8-13 the card index does not contain. The surname is written on the card indistinctly (the shape is closer to „Thorzewskich”), the reading „Tchórzewskich” follows T89 (f. 694, entry 13) and T94 (f. 691, entry 7). At the right-hand edge of the frame, beyond the figure 3, stands a cut-off marker which cannot be read — and so the marker is empty [reading uncertain].
the same entry also names: Tchórzewski Wojciech, Tchórzewski Franciszek †3 persons on 3 hearths
THE NUMBERING OF T90 JUMPS from 7) to 14) — between them there is no entry on the cards, and the sum of the entries recorded comes to exactly 55, that is the „Razem dymów 55” of the same card. This is not a failure of reading: entries 8-13 the card index does not contain. The surname is written on the card indistinctly (the shape is closer to „Thorzewskich”), the reading „Tchórzewskich” follows T89 (f. 694, entry 13) and T94 (f. 691, entry 7). At the right-hand edge of the frame, beyond the figure 3, stands a cut-off marker which cannot be read — and so the marker is empty [reading uncertain].
the same entry also names: Tchórzewski Mateusz, Tchórzewski Franciszek †3 persons on 3 hearths
THE NUMBERING OF T90 JUMPS from 7) to 14) — between them there is no entry on the cards, and the sum of the entries recorded comes to exactly 55, that is the „Razem dymów 55” of the same card. This is not a failure of reading: entries 8-13 the card index does not contain. The surname is written on the card indistinctly (the shape is closer to „Thorzewskich”), the reading „Tchórzewskich” follows T89 (f. 694, entry 13) and T94 (f. 691, entry 7). At the right-hand edge of the frame, beyond the figure 3, stands a cut-off marker which cannot be read — and so the marker is empty [reading uncertain].
the marker transcribed literally: on the card stands „/n. p. of./”, without the stroke in the „ł” — unlike the neighbouring entries 17-21, where „/n. pł. of./” stands plainly. I record what stands there [reading uncertain — it may be an abbreviation of the same „n. pł. of.”].
the same entry also names: Radomyski Wawrzyniec, Radomyski Piotr, Radomyski Maciej, Radomyski Paweł5 persons on 5 hearths
after „Wawrzyńca” one word is struck through and illegible. The same five stand in T89 (f. 692, entry 2) on 5 hearths. The marker /n. pł. of./ refers to the whole group.
the same entry also names: Radomyski Wawrzyniec, Radomyski Piotr, Radomyski Bartłomiej, Radomyski Paweł5 persons on 5 hearths
after „Wawrzyńca” one word is struck through and illegible. The same five stand in T89 (f. 692, entry 2) on 5 hearths. The marker /n. pł. of./ refers to the whole group.
the same entry also names: Radomyski Wawrzyniec, Radomyski Piotr, Radomyski Bartłomiej, Radomyski Maciej5 persons on 5 hearths
after „Wawrzyńca” one word is struck through and illegible. The same five stand in T89 (f. 692, entry 2) on 5 hearths. The marker /n. pł. of./ refers to the whole group.
the same entry also names: Radomyski Wawrzyniec, Radomyski Bartłomiej, Radomyski Maciej, Radomyski Paweł5 persons on 5 hearths
after „Wawrzyńca” one word is struck through and illegible. The same five stand in T89 (f. 692, entry 2) on 5 hearths. The marker /n. pł. of./ refers to the whole group.
the same entry also names: Radomyski Piotr, Radomyski Bartłomiej, Radomyski Maciej, Radomyski Paweł5 persons on 5 hearths
after „Wawrzyńca” one word is struck through and illegible. The same five stand in T89 (f. 692, entry 2) on 5 hearths. The marker /n. pł. of./ refers to the whole group.
the same entry also names: Skrzyszewski Szymon2 persons on 2 hearths
the card writes the surname in the singular („Skryszewskiego”) despite two forenames
the same entry also names: Skrzyszewski Jan2 persons on 2 hearths
the card writes the surname in the singular („Skryszewskiego”) despite two forenames
the same entry also names: Maszczybrodzki Maciej2 persons on 1 hearth
TWO persons, ONE hearth — so it stands on the card („dym 1”, the figure underlined); the total of the whole register (55) confirms that one. The card does not explain the discrepancy.
the same entry also names: Maszczybrodzki Jakób2 persons on 1 hearth
TWO persons, ONE hearth — so it stands on the card („dym 1”, the figure underlined); the total of the whole register (55) confirms that one. The card does not explain the discrepancy.
the same entry also names: Borkowski Jakób2 persons on 2 hearths
the same entry also names: Borkowski Antoni2 persons on 2 hearths
1794 T94Hearth tax register 1794
T₉₄ gives no office beside him; „podwojewodzi ziemi łukowskiej” (deputy voivode of the Łuków Land) is added only by T89 (card 7) and T₀89 (card 9).
the same entry also names: Skrzyszowski Marcin2 persons on 4 hearths
The card names 2 persons and 4 hearths, without dividing how many fall to each — „po 1 dymie” does not stand beside this entry. The number of hearths is certain: the register's own total confirms it. The division we do not supply.
the same entry also names: Skrzyszowski Franc[iszek]2 persons on 4 hearths
The card names 2 persons and 4 hearths, without dividing how many fall to each — „po 1 dymie” does not stand beside this entry. The number of hearths is certain: the register's own total confirms it. The division we do not supply.
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Jakób, Jastrzębski Jan, Jastrzębski Wojciech4 persons on 3 hearths
Four persons, three hearths. This is no error of reading: T90 counts it in the same way on the same card („cz. Jakóba, Jana; – Franciszka i Wojciecha Jastrzębskich /n. pł. of./ po 1 dymie – dymów 3”), and the card's total (55) confirms the figure 3. The card does not say which two share a hearth.
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Jan, Jastrzębski Franc[iszek], Jastrzębski Wojciech4 persons on 3 hearths
Four persons, three hearths. This is no error of reading: T90 counts it in the same way on the same card („cz. Jakóba, Jana; – Franciszka i Wojciecha Jastrzębskich /n. pł. of./ po 1 dymie – dymów 3”), and the card's total (55) confirms the figure 3. The card does not say which two share a hearth.
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Jakób, Jastrzębski Franc[iszek], Jastrzębski Wojciech4 persons on 3 hearths
Four persons, three hearths. This is no error of reading: T90 counts it in the same way on the same card („cz. Jakóba, Jana; – Franciszka i Wojciecha Jastrzębskich /n. pł. of./ po 1 dymie – dymów 3”), and the card's total (55) confirms the figure 3. The card does not say which two share a hearth.
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Jakób, Jastrzębski Jan, Jastrzębski Franc[iszek]4 persons on 3 hearths
Four persons, three hearths. This is no error of reading: T90 counts it in the same way on the same card („cz. Jakóba, Jana; – Franciszka i Wojciecha Jastrzębskich /n. pł. of./ po 1 dymie – dymów 3”), and the card's total (55) confirms the figure 3. The card does not say which two share a hearth.
the same entry also names: Nurzyński Paweł, Nurzyński Piotr, Nurzyński Szymon, Nurzyński Walenty, Nurzyński Józef †6 persons on 6 hearths
The first forename in the entry is thickly struck through on the card and illegible despite magnification — [reading uncertain], I do not enter the person. The number of hearths was corrected (the figure 6 written over an earlier one). Six forenames not struck out = 6 hearths, and that is what follows from the card's total.
the same entry also names: Nurzyński Jan, Nurzyński Paweł, Nurzyński Piotr, Nurzyński Szymon, Nurzyński Walenty6 persons on 6 hearths
The first forename in the entry is thickly struck through on the card and illegible despite magnification — [reading uncertain], I do not enter the person. The number of hearths was corrected (the figure 6 written over an earlier one). Six forenames not struck out = 6 hearths, and that is what follows from the card's total.
the same entry also names: Nurzyński Jan, Nurzyński Piotr, Nurzyński Szymon, Nurzyński Walenty, Nurzyński Józef †6 persons on 6 hearths
The first forename in the entry is thickly struck through on the card and illegible despite magnification — [reading uncertain], I do not enter the person. The number of hearths was corrected (the figure 6 written over an earlier one). Six forenames not struck out = 6 hearths, and that is what follows from the card's total.
the same entry also names: Nurzyński Jan, Nurzyński Paweł, Nurzyński Szymon, Nurzyński Walenty, Nurzyński Józef †6 persons on 6 hearths
The first forename in the entry is thickly struck through on the card and illegible despite magnification — [reading uncertain], I do not enter the person. The number of hearths was corrected (the figure 6 written over an earlier one). Six forenames not struck out = 6 hearths, and that is what follows from the card's total.
the same entry also names: Nurzyński Jan, Nurzyński Paweł, Nurzyński Piotr, Nurzyński Walenty, Nurzyński Józef †6 persons on 6 hearths
The first forename in the entry is thickly struck through on the card and illegible despite magnification — [reading uncertain], I do not enter the person. The number of hearths was corrected (the figure 6 written over an earlier one). Six forenames not struck out = 6 hearths, and that is what follows from the card's total.
the same entry also names: Nurzyński Jan, Nurzyński Paweł, Nurzyński Piotr, Nurzyński Szymon, Nurzyński Józef †6 persons on 6 hearths
The first forename in the entry is thickly struck through on the card and illegible despite magnification — [reading uncertain], I do not enter the person. The number of hearths was corrected (the figure 6 written over an earlier one). Six forenames not struck out = 6 hearths, and that is what follows from the card's total.
the same entry also names: Celiński Andrzej, Celiński Antoni, Celiński Tomasz †4 persons on 4 hearths
Two Andrzejs distinguished by their fathers (Ludwik, Mateusz); the fathers the card does not name as separate possessors, and so I do not enter them.
the card: „Andrzeja po Ludwiku”
the same entry also names: Celiński Andrzej, Celiński Antoni, Celiński Tomasz †4 persons on 4 hearths
Two Andrzejs distinguished by their fathers (Ludwik, Mateusz); the fathers the card does not name as separate possessors, and so I do not enter them.
the card: „Andrzeja po Mateuszu”
the same entry also names: Celiński Andrzej, Celiński Andrzej, Celiński Tomasz †4 persons on 4 hearths
Two Andrzejs distinguished by their fathers (Ludwik, Mateusz); the fathers the card does not name as separate possessors, and so I do not enter them.
the same entry also names: Celiński Andrzej, Celiński Andrzej, Celiński Antoni4 persons on 4 hearths
Two Andrzejs distinguished by their fathers (Ludwik, Mateusz); the fathers the card does not name as separate possessors, and so I do not enter them.
the same entry also names: Radomyski Maciej, Radomyski Paweł, Radomyski Piotr, Radomyski Wawrzyniec5 persons on 5 hearths
the same entry also names: Radomyski Bartłomiej, Radomyski Paweł, Radomyski Piotr, Radomyski Wawrzyniec5 persons on 5 hearths
the same entry also names: Radomyski Bartłomiej, Radomyski Maciej, Radomyski Piotr, Radomyski Wawrzyniec5 persons on 5 hearths
the same entry also names: Radomyski Bartłomiej, Radomyski Maciej, Radomyski Paweł, Radomyski Wawrzyniec5 persons on 5 hearths
the same entry also names: Radomyski Bartłomiej, Radomyski Maciej, Radomyski Paweł, Radomyski Piotr5 persons on 5 hearths
the same entry also names: Borkowski Jakób2 persons on 2 hearths
the same entry also names: Borkowski Antoni2 persons on 2 hearths
the same entry also names: Skrzyszewski Szymon2 persons on 2 hearths
On the same card the surname is written now „Skrzyszowskich” (entry 2), now „Skrzyszewskich” (entry 14); I record it as it stands in the given entry.
the same entry also names: Skrzyszewski Jan2 persons on 2 hearths
On the same card the surname is written now „Skrzyszowskich” (entry 2), now „Skrzyszewskich” (entry 14); I record it as it stands in the given entry.
the same entry also names: Maszczybrodzki Maciej2 persons on 1 hearth
Two persons on one hearth — T90 counts it in the same way on card 5) („cz. Macieja i Jakóba Maszczybrodzkich /n. pł. of./ dym 1”).
the same entry also names: Maszczybrodzki Jakób2 persons on 1 hearth
Two persons on one hearth — T90 counts it in the same way on card 5) („cz. Macieja i Jakóba Maszczybrodzkich /n. pł. of./ dym 1”).
the same entry also names: Rola Andrzej «Bujanek», Rola Antoni «Żurakowicz», Rola Franc[iszek], Rola Jan, Rola Jan, Rola Maciej «Kruperzyk», Rola Paweł, Rola Piotr «Kasprzyk», Rola Jakób †, Rola Jan †, Rola Wojciech «Żakowicz» †, Rola Wojciech «Szymkowicz», Rola Jakób «Szymkowicz», Rola Adam «Szymkowicz», Rola Maciej «Szymkowicz»16 persons on 13 hearths
SIXTEEN PERSONS, THIRTEEN HEARTHS. The card's total (55) is certain and closes only if the four successors (Adam, Jakób, Jan and Wojciech Żakowicz) count together for one hearth; the card does not say so outright, and so I record the discrepancy instead of smoothing it over. The bynames: „Żurakowicz”, „Kruperzyk”, „Kasprzyk” stand directly beside their persons; „Bujanek” stands beside the father of Andrzej (Piotr); „Żakowicza”, in the genitive singular, stands after the fourth of the successors — I assign it to Wojciech alone, though it may just as well cover all four [reading uncertain as to its extent]; „Szymkowicza” stands beside the father, Paweł, and the four named are his sons, so I assign the byname to them all. The family surname of the whole entry — „Rolów” (Rola) — stands once, at the end.
the same entry also names: Rola Andrzej «Bujanek», Rola Antoni «Żurakowicz», Rola Franc[iszek], Rola Jan, Rola Jan, Rola Maciej «Kruperzyk», Rola Paweł, Rola Piotr «Kasprzyk», Rola Adam †, Rola Jakób †, Rola Jan †, Rola Wojciech «Żakowicz» †, Rola Wojciech «Szymkowicz», Rola Jakób «Szymkowicz», Rola Maciej «Szymkowicz»16 persons on 13 hearths
SIXTEEN PERSONS, THIRTEEN HEARTHS. The card's total (55) is certain and closes only if the four successors (Adam, Jakób, Jan and Wojciech Żakowicz) count together for one hearth; the card does not say so outright, and so I record the discrepancy instead of smoothing it over. The bynames: „Żurakowicz”, „Kruperzyk”, „Kasprzyk” stand directly beside their persons; „Bujanek” stands beside the father of Andrzej (Piotr); „Żakowicza”, in the genitive singular, stands after the fourth of the successors — I assign it to Wojciech alone, though it may just as well cover all four [reading uncertain as to its extent]; „Szymkowicza” stands beside the father, Paweł, and the four named are his sons, so I assign the byname to them all. The family surname of the whole entry — „Rolów” (Rola) — stands once, at the end.
son of Paweł Szymkowicz
the same entry also names: Rola Antoni «Żurakowicz», Rola Franc[iszek], Rola Jan, Rola Jan, Rola Maciej «Kruperzyk», Rola Paweł, Rola Piotr «Kasprzyk», Rola Adam †, Rola Jakób †, Rola Jan †, Rola Wojciech «Żakowicz» †, Rola Wojciech «Szymkowicz», Rola Jakób «Szymkowicz», Rola Adam «Szymkowicz», Rola Maciej «Szymkowicz»16 persons on 13 hearths
SIXTEEN PERSONS, THIRTEEN HEARTHS. The card's total (55) is certain and closes only if the four successors (Adam, Jakób, Jan and Wojciech Żakowicz) count together for one hearth; the card does not say so outright, and so I record the discrepancy instead of smoothing it over. The bynames: „Żurakowicz”, „Kruperzyk”, „Kasprzyk” stand directly beside their persons; „Bujanek” stands beside the father of Andrzej (Piotr); „Żakowicza”, in the genitive singular, stands after the fourth of the successors — I assign it to Wojciech alone, though it may just as well cover all four [reading uncertain as to its extent]; „Szymkowicza” stands beside the father, Paweł, and the four named are his sons, so I assign the byname to them all. The family surname of the whole entry — „Rolów” (Rola) — stands once, at the end.
the card: „Andrzeja po Piotrze Bujanku” — the byname stands beside the father, Piotr
the same entry also names: Rola Andrzej «Bujanek», Rola Franc[iszek], Rola Jan, Rola Jan, Rola Maciej «Kruperzyk», Rola Paweł, Rola Piotr «Kasprzyk», Rola Adam †, Rola Jakób †, Rola Jan †, Rola Wojciech «Żakowicz» †, Rola Wojciech «Szymkowicz», Rola Jakób «Szymkowicz», Rola Adam «Szymkowicz», Rola Maciej «Szymkowicz»16 persons on 13 hearths
SIXTEEN PERSONS, THIRTEEN HEARTHS. The card's total (55) is certain and closes only if the four successors (Adam, Jakób, Jan and Wojciech Żakowicz) count together for one hearth; the card does not say so outright, and so I record the discrepancy instead of smoothing it over. The bynames: „Żurakowicz”, „Kruperzyk”, „Kasprzyk” stand directly beside their persons; „Bujanek” stands beside the father of Andrzej (Piotr); „Żakowicza”, in the genitive singular, stands after the fourth of the successors — I assign it to Wojciech alone, though it may just as well cover all four [reading uncertain as to its extent]; „Szymkowicza” stands beside the father, Paweł, and the four named are his sons, so I assign the byname to them all. The family surname of the whole entry — „Rolów” (Rola) — stands once, at the end.
the same entry also names: Rola Andrzej «Bujanek», Rola Antoni «Żurakowicz», Rola Jan, Rola Jan, Rola Maciej «Kruperzyk», Rola Paweł, Rola Piotr «Kasprzyk», Rola Adam †, Rola Jakób †, Rola Jan †, Rola Wojciech «Żakowicz» †, Rola Wojciech «Szymkowicz», Rola Jakób «Szymkowicz», Rola Adam «Szymkowicz», Rola Maciej «Szymkowicz»16 persons on 13 hearths
SIXTEEN PERSONS, THIRTEEN HEARTHS. The card's total (55) is certain and closes only if the four successors (Adam, Jakób, Jan and Wojciech Żakowicz) count together for one hearth; the card does not say so outright, and so I record the discrepancy instead of smoothing it over. The bynames: „Żurakowicz”, „Kruperzyk”, „Kasprzyk” stand directly beside their persons; „Bujanek” stands beside the father of Andrzej (Piotr); „Żakowicza”, in the genitive singular, stands after the fourth of the successors — I assign it to Wojciech alone, though it may just as well cover all four [reading uncertain as to its extent]; „Szymkowicza” stands beside the father, Paweł, and the four named are his sons, so I assign the byname to them all. The family surname of the whole entry — „Rolów” (Rola) — stands once, at the end.
the card: „Franc. po Pawle”
the same entry also names: Rola Andrzej «Bujanek», Rola Antoni «Żurakowicz», Rola Franc[iszek], Rola Jan, Rola Jan, Rola Maciej «Kruperzyk», Rola Paweł, Rola Piotr «Kasprzyk», Rola Adam †, Rola Jakób †, Rola Jan †, Rola Wojciech «Żakowicz» †, Rola Wojciech «Szymkowicz», Rola Adam «Szymkowicz», Rola Maciej «Szymkowicz»16 persons on 13 hearths
SIXTEEN PERSONS, THIRTEEN HEARTHS. The card's total (55) is certain and closes only if the four successors (Adam, Jakób, Jan and Wojciech Żakowicz) count together for one hearth; the card does not say so outright, and so I record the discrepancy instead of smoothing it over. The bynames: „Żurakowicz”, „Kruperzyk”, „Kasprzyk” stand directly beside their persons; „Bujanek” stands beside the father of Andrzej (Piotr); „Żakowicza”, in the genitive singular, stands after the fourth of the successors — I assign it to Wojciech alone, though it may just as well cover all four [reading uncertain as to its extent]; „Szymkowicza” stands beside the father, Paweł, and the four named are his sons, so I assign the byname to them all. The family surname of the whole entry — „Rolów” (Rola) — stands once, at the end.
son of Paweł Szymkowicz
the same entry also names: Rola Andrzej «Bujanek», Rola Antoni «Żurakowicz», Rola Franc[iszek], Rola Jan, Rola Jan, Rola Maciej «Kruperzyk», Rola Paweł, Rola Piotr «Kasprzyk», Rola Adam †, Rola Jan †, Rola Wojciech «Żakowicz» †, Rola Wojciech «Szymkowicz», Rola Jakób «Szymkowicz», Rola Adam «Szymkowicz», Rola Maciej «Szymkowicz»16 persons on 13 hearths
SIXTEEN PERSONS, THIRTEEN HEARTHS. The card's total (55) is certain and closes only if the four successors (Adam, Jakób, Jan and Wojciech Żakowicz) count together for one hearth; the card does not say so outright, and so I record the discrepancy instead of smoothing it over. The bynames: „Żurakowicz”, „Kruperzyk”, „Kasprzyk” stand directly beside their persons; „Bujanek” stands beside the father of Andrzej (Piotr); „Żakowicza”, in the genitive singular, stands after the fourth of the successors — I assign it to Wojciech alone, though it may just as well cover all four [reading uncertain as to its extent]; „Szymkowicza” stands beside the father, Paweł, and the four named are his sons, so I assign the byname to them all. The family surname of the whole entry — „Rolów” (Rola) — stands once, at the end.
the same entry also names: Rola Andrzej «Bujanek», Rola Antoni «Żurakowicz», Rola Franc[iszek], Rola Jan, Rola Maciej «Kruperzyk», Rola Paweł, Rola Piotr «Kasprzyk», Rola Adam †, Rola Jakób †, Rola Jan †, Rola Wojciech «Żakowicz» †, Rola Wojciech «Szymkowicz», Rola Jakób «Szymkowicz», Rola Adam «Szymkowicz», Rola Maciej «Szymkowicz»16 persons on 13 hearths
SIXTEEN PERSONS, THIRTEEN HEARTHS. The card's total (55) is certain and closes only if the four successors (Adam, Jakób, Jan and Wojciech Żakowicz) count together for one hearth; the card does not say so outright, and so I record the discrepancy instead of smoothing it over. The bynames: „Żurakowicz”, „Kruperzyk”, „Kasprzyk” stand directly beside their persons; „Bujanek” stands beside the father of Andrzej (Piotr); „Żakowicza”, in the genitive singular, stands after the fourth of the successors — I assign it to Wojciech alone, though it may just as well cover all four [reading uncertain as to its extent]; „Szymkowicza” stands beside the father, Paweł, and the four named are his sons, so I assign the byname to them all. The family surname of the whole entry — „Rolów” (Rola) — stands once, at the end.
the card: „2 Janów” — the first of the two
the same entry also names: Rola Andrzej «Bujanek», Rola Antoni «Żurakowicz», Rola Franc[iszek], Rola Jan, Rola Maciej «Kruperzyk», Rola Paweł, Rola Piotr «Kasprzyk», Rola Adam †, Rola Jakób †, Rola Jan †, Rola Wojciech «Żakowicz» †, Rola Wojciech «Szymkowicz», Rola Jakób «Szymkowicz», Rola Adam «Szymkowicz», Rola Maciej «Szymkowicz»16 persons on 13 hearths
SIXTEEN PERSONS, THIRTEEN HEARTHS. The card's total (55) is certain and closes only if the four successors (Adam, Jakób, Jan and Wojciech Żakowicz) count together for one hearth; the card does not say so outright, and so I record the discrepancy instead of smoothing it over. The bynames: „Żurakowicz”, „Kruperzyk”, „Kasprzyk” stand directly beside their persons; „Bujanek” stands beside the father of Andrzej (Piotr); „Żakowicza”, in the genitive singular, stands after the fourth of the successors — I assign it to Wojciech alone, though it may just as well cover all four [reading uncertain as to its extent]; „Szymkowicza” stands beside the father, Paweł, and the four named are his sons, so I assign the byname to them all. The family surname of the whole entry — „Rolów” (Rola) — stands once, at the end.
the card: „2 Janów” — the second of the two
the same entry also names: Rola Andrzej «Bujanek», Rola Antoni «Żurakowicz», Rola Franc[iszek], Rola Jan, Rola Jan, Rola Maciej «Kruperzyk», Rola Paweł, Rola Piotr «Kasprzyk», Rola Adam †, Rola Jakób †, Rola Wojciech «Żakowicz» †, Rola Wojciech «Szymkowicz», Rola Jakób «Szymkowicz», Rola Adam «Szymkowicz», Rola Maciej «Szymkowicz»16 persons on 13 hearths
SIXTEEN PERSONS, THIRTEEN HEARTHS. The card's total (55) is certain and closes only if the four successors (Adam, Jakób, Jan and Wojciech Żakowicz) count together for one hearth; the card does not say so outright, and so I record the discrepancy instead of smoothing it over. The bynames: „Żurakowicz”, „Kruperzyk”, „Kasprzyk” stand directly beside their persons; „Bujanek” stands beside the father of Andrzej (Piotr); „Żakowicza”, in the genitive singular, stands after the fourth of the successors — I assign it to Wojciech alone, though it may just as well cover all four [reading uncertain as to its extent]; „Szymkowicza” stands beside the father, Paweł, and the four named are his sons, so I assign the byname to them all. The family surname of the whole entry — „Rolów” (Rola) — stands once, at the end.
the same entry also names: Rola Andrzej «Bujanek», Rola Antoni «Żurakowicz», Rola Franc[iszek], Rola Jan, Rola Jan, Rola Paweł, Rola Piotr «Kasprzyk», Rola Adam †, Rola Jakób †, Rola Jan †, Rola Wojciech «Żakowicz» †, Rola Wojciech «Szymkowicz», Rola Jakób «Szymkowicz», Rola Adam «Szymkowicz», Rola Maciej «Szymkowicz»16 persons on 13 hearths
SIXTEEN PERSONS, THIRTEEN HEARTHS. The card's total (55) is certain and closes only if the four successors (Adam, Jakób, Jan and Wojciech Żakowicz) count together for one hearth; the card does not say so outright, and so I record the discrepancy instead of smoothing it over. The bynames: „Żurakowicz”, „Kruperzyk”, „Kasprzyk” stand directly beside their persons; „Bujanek” stands beside the father of Andrzej (Piotr); „Żakowicza”, in the genitive singular, stands after the fourth of the successors — I assign it to Wojciech alone, though it may just as well cover all four [reading uncertain as to its extent]; „Szymkowicza” stands beside the father, Paweł, and the four named are his sons, so I assign the byname to them all. The family surname of the whole entry — „Rolów” (Rola) — stands once, at the end.
the same entry also names: Rola Andrzej «Bujanek», Rola Antoni «Żurakowicz», Rola Franc[iszek], Rola Jan, Rola Jan, Rola Maciej «Kruperzyk», Rola Paweł, Rola Piotr «Kasprzyk», Rola Adam †, Rola Jakób †, Rola Jan †, Rola Wojciech «Żakowicz» †, Rola Wojciech «Szymkowicz», Rola Jakób «Szymkowicz», Rola Adam «Szymkowicz»16 persons on 13 hearths
SIXTEEN PERSONS, THIRTEEN HEARTHS. The card's total (55) is certain and closes only if the four successors (Adam, Jakób, Jan and Wojciech Żakowicz) count together for one hearth; the card does not say so outright, and so I record the discrepancy instead of smoothing it over. The bynames: „Żurakowicz”, „Kruperzyk”, „Kasprzyk” stand directly beside their persons; „Bujanek” stands beside the father of Andrzej (Piotr); „Żakowicza”, in the genitive singular, stands after the fourth of the successors — I assign it to Wojciech alone, though it may just as well cover all four [reading uncertain as to its extent]; „Szymkowicza” stands beside the father, Paweł, and the four named are his sons, so I assign the byname to them all. The family surname of the whole entry — „Rolów” (Rola) — stands once, at the end.
son of Paweł Szymkowicz
the same entry also names: Rola Andrzej «Bujanek», Rola Antoni «Żurakowicz», Rola Franc[iszek], Rola Jan, Rola Jan, Rola Maciej «Kruperzyk», Rola Piotr «Kasprzyk», Rola Adam †, Rola Jakób †, Rola Jan †, Rola Wojciech «Żakowicz» †, Rola Wojciech «Szymkowicz», Rola Jakób «Szymkowicz», Rola Adam «Szymkowicz», Rola Maciej «Szymkowicz»16 persons on 13 hearths
SIXTEEN PERSONS, THIRTEEN HEARTHS. The card's total (55) is certain and closes only if the four successors (Adam, Jakób, Jan and Wojciech Żakowicz) count together for one hearth; the card does not say so outright, and so I record the discrepancy instead of smoothing it over. The bynames: „Żurakowicz”, „Kruperzyk”, „Kasprzyk” stand directly beside their persons; „Bujanek” stands beside the father of Andrzej (Piotr); „Żakowicza”, in the genitive singular, stands after the fourth of the successors — I assign it to Wojciech alone, though it may just as well cover all four [reading uncertain as to its extent]; „Szymkowicza” stands beside the father, Paweł, and the four named are his sons, so I assign the byname to them all. The family surname of the whole entry — „Rolów” (Rola) — stands once, at the end.
the same entry also names: Rola Andrzej «Bujanek», Rola Antoni «Żurakowicz», Rola Franc[iszek], Rola Jan, Rola Jan, Rola Maciej «Kruperzyk», Rola Paweł, Rola Adam †, Rola Jakób †, Rola Jan †, Rola Wojciech «Żakowicz» †, Rola Wojciech «Szymkowicz», Rola Jakób «Szymkowicz», Rola Adam «Szymkowicz», Rola Maciej «Szymkowicz»16 persons on 13 hearths
SIXTEEN PERSONS, THIRTEEN HEARTHS. The card's total (55) is certain and closes only if the four successors (Adam, Jakób, Jan and Wojciech Żakowicz) count together for one hearth; the card does not say so outright, and so I record the discrepancy instead of smoothing it over. The bynames: „Żurakowicz”, „Kruperzyk”, „Kasprzyk” stand directly beside their persons; „Bujanek” stands beside the father of Andrzej (Piotr); „Żakowicza”, in the genitive singular, stands after the fourth of the successors — I assign it to Wojciech alone, though it may just as well cover all four [reading uncertain as to its extent]; „Szymkowicza” stands beside the father, Paweł, and the four named are his sons, so I assign the byname to them all. The family surname of the whole entry — „Rolów” (Rola) — stands once, at the end.
the same entry also names: Rola Andrzej «Bujanek», Rola Antoni «Żurakowicz», Rola Franc[iszek], Rola Jan, Rola Jan, Rola Maciej «Kruperzyk», Rola Paweł, Rola Piotr «Kasprzyk», Rola Adam †, Rola Jakób †, Rola Jan †, Rola Wojciech «Żakowicz» †, Rola Jakób «Szymkowicz», Rola Adam «Szymkowicz», Rola Maciej «Szymkowicz»16 persons on 13 hearths
SIXTEEN PERSONS, THIRTEEN HEARTHS. The card's total (55) is certain and closes only if the four successors (Adam, Jakób, Jan and Wojciech Żakowicz) count together for one hearth; the card does not say so outright, and so I record the discrepancy instead of smoothing it over. The bynames: „Żurakowicz”, „Kruperzyk”, „Kasprzyk” stand directly beside their persons; „Bujanek” stands beside the father of Andrzej (Piotr); „Żakowicza”, in the genitive singular, stands after the fourth of the successors — I assign it to Wojciech alone, though it may just as well cover all four [reading uncertain as to its extent]; „Szymkowicza” stands beside the father, Paweł, and the four named are his sons, so I assign the byname to them all. The family surname of the whole entry — „Rolów” (Rola) — stands once, at the end.
son of Paweł Szymkowicz
the same entry also names: Rola Andrzej «Bujanek», Rola Antoni «Żurakowicz», Rola Franc[iszek], Rola Jan, Rola Jan, Rola Maciej «Kruperzyk», Rola Paweł, Rola Piotr «Kasprzyk», Rola Adam †, Rola Jakób †, Rola Jan †, Rola Wojciech «Szymkowicz», Rola Jakób «Szymkowicz», Rola Adam «Szymkowicz», Rola Maciej «Szymkowicz»16 persons on 13 hearths
SIXTEEN PERSONS, THIRTEEN HEARTHS. The card's total (55) is certain and closes only if the four successors (Adam, Jakób, Jan and Wojciech Żakowicz) count together for one hearth; the card does not say so outright, and so I record the discrepancy instead of smoothing it over. The bynames: „Żurakowicz”, „Kruperzyk”, „Kasprzyk” stand directly beside their persons; „Bujanek” stands beside the father of Andrzej (Piotr); „Żakowicza”, in the genitive singular, stands after the fourth of the successors — I assign it to Wojciech alone, though it may just as well cover all four [reading uncertain as to its extent]; „Szymkowicza” stands beside the father, Paweł, and the four named are his sons, so I assign the byname to them all. The family surname of the whole entry — „Rolów” (Rola) — stands once, at the end.
the same entry also names: Sulej Szczepan, Sulej Tomasz3 persons on 3 hearths
The surname in the genitive plural „Sulejów” → the nominative „Sulej”. Bonawentura is a man.
the same entry also names: Sulej Bonawentura, Sulej Tomasz3 persons on 3 hearths
The surname in the genitive plural „Sulejów” → the nominative „Sulej”. Bonawentura is a man.
the same entry also names: Sulej Bonawentura, Sulej Szczepan3 persons on 3 hearths
The surname in the genitive plural „Sulejów” → the nominative „Sulej”. Bonawentura is a man.
the same entry also names: Tchórzewski Mateusz, Tchórzewski Wojciech3 persons on 3 hearths
the same entry also names: Tchórzewski Wojciech, Tchórzewski Franc[iszek] †3 persons on 3 hearths
the same entry also names: Tchórzewski Mateusz, Tchórzewski Franc[iszek] †3 persons on 3 hearths
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Wojciech2 persons on a holding without hearths
The entry is struck through in its entirety on the card — together with the figure 1 and with the leader dots running to the column. It does not enter the total „Razem – 55 dymów” (the reckoning closes only without it), and so the hearths figure = null. The same Franciszek and Wojciech Jastrzębski are already taken in in entry 3.
the same entry also names: Jastrzębski Franc[iszek]2 persons on a holding without hearths
The entry is struck through in its entirety on the card — together with the figure 1 and with the leader dots running to the column. It does not enter the total „Razem – 55 dymów” (the reckoning closes only without it), and so the hearths figure = null. The same Franciszek and Wojciech Jastrzębski are already taken in in entry 3.
This locality in the full edition of the hearth-tax registers — together with a search across all persons, a modern map, Perthées’s engraving of 1786 and a statistical summary.
