the same entry also names: Świerczowski Tomasz, Świerczowski Jan, Świerczowski Paweł, Świerczowski Marcin5 persons on 5 hearths
Home › Castle court records / Old sources › The hearth-tax registers 1775–1794 › Świercze
Hearth Tax Registers of the Łuków Land 1775–1794
Świercze
Parish of Łuków, łukowski county.
Dear reader, remember that this is an AI study, that it may contain errors; treat it as indicative and verify it for yourself.
Extracts from outside the registers
Records under sigla which the card index does not expand. They give no hearths, so they enter no total.
note: A cartographical note (Perthées) — the name of the village alone, without any figure. A siglum from outside the list of the eight, and so it does not enter the reckoning of hearths. The stroke over the „S” is there.
note: A cartographical note (Heldensfeld) — the name of the village alone. The writing differs from the rest: „Świerscze”, with an „s” before the „cz”. A siglum from outside the list of the eight.
note: A cartographical note (a topographical map) — the name of the village alone. A siglum from outside the list of the eight.
spellings on the cards: Świercze, Swircze, Świerscze
district of łukowski · parish of Łuków · cards 1), 2), 3), 4)
a noble village [O83 (IX)]
| Year | Source | Entries | Hearths |
|---|---|---|---|
| T75 | Hearth tax register 1775 | 5 | 14 |
| T89 | Hearth tax register 1789 | 4 | 17 |
| T90 | Hearth tax register 1790 | 5 | 12 |
| T94 | Hearth tax register 1794 | 3 | 10 |
Caveats on the years' registers (6)
What the compiler noted beside the entry itself, and what the table above does not show:
- T89 — The total agrees: 9 + 3 + 1 + 4 = 17 = „Razem 17 d.” (the figure underlined). The extract has no heading with the name of the village — only the siglum „T89 –”. The buildings are not itemised: neither manor houses, nor cottages, nor an inn, nor a brewery — only figures of hearths beside the holdings.
- T₀89 — A list of possessors of holdings of 1789 — seventeen part-holdings, without hearths (in accordance with the character of the siglum T₀89). The word „część” is written out in full only at entries 1 and 17, at the rest it is replaced by a repetition mark; in the text of the extract I render this literally. THE WHOLE LIST IS COVERED BY THE ANNOTATION „nie wysiewa 10 korcy”: entries 1–16 are joined by a vertical brace running down the middle of the card, along which, in writing turned through 90°, „nie wysiewają 10 korcy” is added (read after the four strips had been joined and the frame turned round — the words read distinctly, letter by letter), while entry 17 has the same remark written out separately, horizontally and in the singular. No entry mentions propination, a pledge, or an inn or a brewery — although the T₀89 lists usually record such things. The membership of the families agrees with the T89 of the same date: the Karwowskis (6 holdings), the Świerczowskis (4), the Zarzeckis (4), the Kurowskis (2), Radomyski (1).
- T90 — The total agrees: 6 + 2 + 1 + 2 + 1 = 12 = „Razem dymów 12”. Beside the figure of the total a trace of a correction is to be seen — under the final „2” there sticks up the upper bowl of an earlier figure, most probably a „3”; I read „12”, because that is what the five entries of this extract give. BLUE ADDITIONS. Below the last line of T90, separated from it by a long brace, stand two lines written in BLUE ink — the same in which the whole of T94 below is written (a measurement of the colour of the ink: the T90 lines B−R ≈ +6, the blue lines B−R ≈ +31, the total „Razem dymów 12” B−R ≈ +4, that is, black): (a) taken into the brace „5) cz. Adama, Ignacego i sukc. Wawrz. Dębowskich – 1 dym”, that is, a repetition of entry 5 of T90 with a corrected spelling of the surname; (b) outside the brace „6) cz. Zarzyckich —— 1 dym”. These two lines I do NOT count to T90: the black total („12”) was written down before them and closes without them, and their numbering (5, 6) is a continuation of the T90 numbering only by its position on the card. What is more important, both these part-holdings — one hearth of the Dębowskis and one hearth of the Zarzeckis — are exactly the 2 hearths which the T94 extract lacks for its own total of 12 (see the note at T94). WHAT CALLS FOR A DECISION BY THE OWNER: whether to assign both blue lines to T94 as its entries 4 and 5 (T94 then closes at 12 to the single hearth), or to leave them as an unassigned collating addition. I do not assign them myself, so as not to smooth the discrepancy away.
- T94 — THE TOTAL DOES NOT CLOSE, AND THIS IS A FINDING, NOT AN ERROR OF READING. The three entries written down give 6 + 2 + 2 = 10 hearths, while the card gives below the stroke „Razem 12 dymów.”. All four figures I have checked at eightfold magnification: the „6” at entry 1 has one bowl (not an „8”), both twos are underlined, and the total reads „12” (the first character is a one with a flag, the second a two with a horizontal foot — not „10”). The missing 2 hearths stand, as it seems, just ABOVE the heading of T94, in two lines written in the same blue ink as the whole of this extract: „5) cz. Adama, Ignacego i sukc. Wawrz. Dębowskich – 1 dym” and „6) cz. Zarzyckich —— 1 dym” (1 + 1 = 2, exactly as many as are missing). The numbering of these lines (5, 6) follows, however, the numbering of T90, not of T94, so I do not settle the assignment and do not draw them into the entries of the extract; in accordance with the rule I leave the total from the card empty, and the figure from the card in the total written on the card. The decision belongs to the owner of the work. Were both lines to be counted in, T94 would have five entries and would close at 12 to the single hearth, and the membership of the village in 1794 would be identical with that of T90 in 1790 — the Karwowskis 6, the Świerczowskis 2, the Kurowskis 2, the Zarzeckis 1, the Dębowskis 1, save that T94 merges the Zarzeckis into a single part-holding without forenames.
- S87 — The 1787 census: „80 l. + 7 ż. razem 87 l.”, the figure „87” underlined. The components add up (80 + 7 = 87). The name of the village in this line is written „Swircze”, without the „e” after the „w” and without the stroke over the „S” — the only such place on the four cards. Recorded in the village's the 1787 census field as well. There is no second, independent check: the print of Fr. B. Kumor we have transcribed for the parishes of Trzebieszów and Tuchowicz, and this village lies in the parish of Łuków.
- V48 — The V48 extract is the name of the village alone, without any figure and without a surname. The writing „Świercze”, with a distinct stroke over the „S”, agreeing with the headings of the cards.
The card-index entries
Every extract for this locality in the wording of the cards, year by year. One block is one occurrence: this person, in this year. At a collective item the same card text stands beside every person named — because the card names them together and they must not be separated. The hearths given at a collective item are an equal division among those named, not a reading.
1775 T75Hearth tax register 1775
the same entry also names: Świerczowski Franciszek, Świerczowski Tomasz, Świerczowski Paweł, Świerczowski Marcin5 persons on 5 hearths
The forename „Tomasza” is struck out on the card with a single horizontal stroke, and yet the total of the entry comes to 5 with five forenames and the wording „po 1 dymie” — the striking out was therefore not subtracted from the number of hearths. I record the person, because it is he who is named in the source. The reckoning confirms the reading: 5 + 6 + 1 + 1 + 1 = 14, as much as „Razem dymów 14”.
the same entry also names: Świerczowski Franciszek, Świerczowski Tomasz, Świerczowski Jan, Świerczowski Paweł5 persons on 5 hearths
The forename „Tomasza” is struck out on the card with a single horizontal stroke, and yet the total of the entry comes to 5 with five forenames and the wording „po 1 dymie” — the striking out was therefore not subtracted from the number of hearths. I record the person, because it is he who is named in the source. The reckoning confirms the reading: 5 + 6 + 1 + 1 + 1 = 14, as much as „Razem dymów 14”.
the same entry also names: Świerczowski Franciszek, Świerczowski Tomasz, Świerczowski Jan, Świerczowski Marcin5 persons on 5 hearths
The forename „Tomasza” is struck out on the card with a single horizontal stroke, and yet the total of the entry comes to 5 with five forenames and the wording „po 1 dymie” — the striking out was therefore not subtracted from the number of hearths. I record the person, because it is he who is named in the source. The reckoning confirms the reading: 5 + 6 + 1 + 1 + 1 = 14, as much as „Razem dymów 14”.
the same entry also names: Świerczowski Franciszek, Świerczowski Jan, Świerczowski Paweł, Świerczowski Marcin5 persons on 5 hearths
The forename „Tomasza” is struck out on the card with a single horizontal stroke, and yet the total of the entry comes to 5 with five forenames and the wording „po 1 dymie” — the striking out was therefore not subtracted from the number of hearths. I record the person, because it is he who is named in the source. The reckoning confirms the reading: 5 + 6 + 1 + 1 + 1 = 14, as much as „Razem dymów 14”.
the same entry also names: Karwowski Tomasz, Karwowski Łukasz, Karwowski Wojciech, Karwowski Stanisław5 persons on 6 hearths
Five forenames, six hearths — a discrepancy of the source, not of the reading: the figure 6 is underlined and the card's total confirms it (5 + 6 + 1 + 1 + 1 = 14 = „Razem dymów 14”). The forename „Tomasza” is struck out with a single stroke, just as in entry 1, and just as there it was not subtracted from the number of hearths. One of these five holdings must therefore count two hearths, or a sixth forename was omitted in the copying of the card index.
the same entry also names: Karwowski Tomasz, Karwowski Józef, Karwowski Wojciech, Karwowski Stanisław5 persons on 6 hearths
Five forenames, six hearths — a discrepancy of the source, not of the reading: the figure 6 is underlined and the card's total confirms it (5 + 6 + 1 + 1 + 1 = 14 = „Razem dymów 14”). The forename „Tomasza” is struck out with a single stroke, just as in entry 1, and just as there it was not subtracted from the number of hearths. One of these five holdings must therefore count two hearths, or a sixth forename was omitted in the copying of the card index.
the same entry also names: Karwowski Tomasz, Karwowski Józef, Karwowski Łukasz, Karwowski Wojciech5 persons on 6 hearths
Five forenames, six hearths — a discrepancy of the source, not of the reading: the figure 6 is underlined and the card's total confirms it (5 + 6 + 1 + 1 + 1 = 14 = „Razem dymów 14”). The forename „Tomasza” is struck out with a single stroke, just as in entry 1, and just as there it was not subtracted from the number of hearths. One of these five holdings must therefore count two hearths, or a sixth forename was omitted in the copying of the card index.
the same entry also names: Karwowski Józef, Karwowski Łukasz, Karwowski Wojciech, Karwowski Stanisław5 persons on 6 hearths
Five forenames, six hearths — a discrepancy of the source, not of the reading: the figure 6 is underlined and the card's total confirms it (5 + 6 + 1 + 1 + 1 = 14 = „Razem dymów 14”). The forename „Tomasza” is struck out with a single stroke, just as in entry 1, and just as there it was not subtracted from the number of hearths. One of these five holdings must therefore count two hearths, or a sixth forename was omitted in the copying of the card index.
the same entry also names: Karwowski Tomasz, Karwowski Józef, Karwowski Łukasz, Karwowski Stanisław5 persons on 6 hearths
Five forenames, six hearths — a discrepancy of the source, not of the reading: the figure 6 is underlined and the card's total confirms it (5 + 6 + 1 + 1 + 1 = 14 = „Razem dymów 14”). The forename „Tomasza” is struck out with a single stroke, just as in entry 1, and just as there it was not subtracted from the number of hearths. One of these five holdings must therefore count two hearths, or a sixth forename was omitted in the copying of the card index.
The surname on this card in the form „Zarzycki”; T89 and T₀89 (cards 3) and 736) write the same family „Zarzecki”, T90 again „Zarzycki”. I record it as it stands on the given card.
1789 T89Hearth tax register 1789
the same entry also names: Karwowski Stan[isław] †, Karwowski Wawrz[yniec], Karwowski Fran[ciszek] †, Karwowski Łuk[asz], Karwowski Woje[ciech], Karwowski Marcin, Karwowski Tomasz, Karwowski Woje[ciech], Karwowski Jędrzej, Karwowski Fran[ciszek]11 persons on 9 hearths
Eleven forenames, nine hearths — the figure 9 is confirmed by the card's total (9 + 3 + 1 + 4 = 17 = „Razem 17 d.”), so this is a discrepancy of the source. THE SCOPE OF THE ABBREVIATION „sukc.” IS AMBIGUOUS [reading uncertain]: „cz. sukc. Stan., Wawrz. i Franc.” can be read either as the successors of three persons at once (of Stanisław, of Wawrzyniec and of Franciszek), or as the successors of Stanisław alone, with Wawrzyniec and Franciszek still living; and the same with the second „sukc. Franc., Łuk. i Woje.”. I have taken the narrower reading — „sukc.” covers only the forename immediately following it — and I set the mark for a deceased person only for those two, Franciszek and Stanisław; on the wider reading the dead would number six. The forename „Woje.” is an abbreviation written on the card in just that way (not „Woyc.”), and I expand it to „Wojciech”. The surname „Karwowskich” is underlined, stands once at the end, and covers all those named.
the same entry also names: Karwowski Stan[isław] †, Karwowski Wawrz[yniec], Karwowski Fran[ciszek], Karwowski Łuk[asz], Karwowski Woje[ciech], Karwowski Marcin, Karwowski Tomasz, Karwowski Woje[ciech], Karwowski Jędrzej, Karwowski Fran[ciszek]11 persons on 9 hearths
Eleven forenames, nine hearths — the figure 9 is confirmed by the card's total (9 + 3 + 1 + 4 = 17 = „Razem 17 d.”), so this is a discrepancy of the source. THE SCOPE OF THE ABBREVIATION „sukc.” IS AMBIGUOUS [reading uncertain]: „cz. sukc. Stan., Wawrz. i Franc.” can be read either as the successors of three persons at once (of Stanisław, of Wawrzyniec and of Franciszek), or as the successors of Stanisław alone, with Wawrzyniec and Franciszek still living; and the same with the second „sukc. Franc., Łuk. i Woje.”. I have taken the narrower reading — „sukc.” covers only the forename immediately following it — and I set the mark for a deceased person only for those two, Franciszek and Stanisław; on the wider reading the dead would number six. The forename „Woje.” is an abbreviation written on the card in just that way (not „Woyc.”), and I expand it to „Wojciech”. The surname „Karwowskich” is underlined, stands once at the end, and covers all those named.
the same entry also names: Karwowski Stan[isław] †, Karwowski Wawrz[yniec], Karwowski Fran[ciszek], Karwowski Fran[ciszek] †, Karwowski Łuk[asz], Karwowski Woje[ciech], Karwowski Marcin, Karwowski Tomasz, Karwowski Woje[ciech], Karwowski Jędrzej11 persons on 9 hearths
Eleven forenames, nine hearths — the figure 9 is confirmed by the card's total (9 + 3 + 1 + 4 = 17 = „Razem 17 d.”), so this is a discrepancy of the source. THE SCOPE OF THE ABBREVIATION „sukc.” IS AMBIGUOUS [reading uncertain]: „cz. sukc. Stan., Wawrz. i Franc.” can be read either as the successors of three persons at once (of Stanisław, of Wawrzyniec and of Franciszek), or as the successors of Stanisław alone, with Wawrzyniec and Franciszek still living; and the same with the second „sukc. Franc., Łuk. i Woje.”. I have taken the narrower reading — „sukc.” covers only the forename immediately following it — and I set the mark for a deceased person only for those two, Franciszek and Stanisław; on the wider reading the dead would number six. The forename „Woje.” is an abbreviation written on the card in just that way (not „Woyc.”), and I expand it to „Wojciech”. The surname „Karwowskich” is underlined, stands once at the end, and covers all those named.
the same entry also names: Karwowski Stan[isław] †, Karwowski Wawrz[yniec], Karwowski Fran[ciszek], Karwowski Fran[ciszek] †, Karwowski Łuk[asz], Karwowski Woje[ciech], Karwowski Marcin, Karwowski Tomasz, Karwowski Woje[ciech], Karwowski Fran[ciszek]11 persons on 9 hearths
Eleven forenames, nine hearths — the figure 9 is confirmed by the card's total (9 + 3 + 1 + 4 = 17 = „Razem 17 d.”), so this is a discrepancy of the source. THE SCOPE OF THE ABBREVIATION „sukc.” IS AMBIGUOUS [reading uncertain]: „cz. sukc. Stan., Wawrz. i Franc.” can be read either as the successors of three persons at once (of Stanisław, of Wawrzyniec and of Franciszek), or as the successors of Stanisław alone, with Wawrzyniec and Franciszek still living; and the same with the second „sukc. Franc., Łuk. i Woje.”. I have taken the narrower reading — „sukc.” covers only the forename immediately following it — and I set the mark for a deceased person only for those two, Franciszek and Stanisław; on the wider reading the dead would number six. The forename „Woje.” is an abbreviation written on the card in just that way (not „Woyc.”), and I expand it to „Wojciech”. The surname „Karwowskich” is underlined, stands once at the end, and covers all those named.
the same entry also names: Karwowski Stan[isław] †, Karwowski Wawrz[yniec], Karwowski Fran[ciszek], Karwowski Fran[ciszek] †, Karwowski Woje[ciech], Karwowski Marcin, Karwowski Tomasz, Karwowski Woje[ciech], Karwowski Jędrzej, Karwowski Fran[ciszek]11 persons on 9 hearths
Eleven forenames, nine hearths — the figure 9 is confirmed by the card's total (9 + 3 + 1 + 4 = 17 = „Razem 17 d.”), so this is a discrepancy of the source. THE SCOPE OF THE ABBREVIATION „sukc.” IS AMBIGUOUS [reading uncertain]: „cz. sukc. Stan., Wawrz. i Franc.” can be read either as the successors of three persons at once (of Stanisław, of Wawrzyniec and of Franciszek), or as the successors of Stanisław alone, with Wawrzyniec and Franciszek still living; and the same with the second „sukc. Franc., Łuk. i Woje.”. I have taken the narrower reading — „sukc.” covers only the forename immediately following it — and I set the mark for a deceased person only for those two, Franciszek and Stanisław; on the wider reading the dead would number six. The forename „Woje.” is an abbreviation written on the card in just that way (not „Woyc.”), and I expand it to „Wojciech”. The surname „Karwowskich” is underlined, stands once at the end, and covers all those named.
the same entry also names: Karwowski Stan[isław] †, Karwowski Wawrz[yniec], Karwowski Fran[ciszek], Karwowski Fran[ciszek] †, Karwowski Łuk[asz], Karwowski Woje[ciech], Karwowski Tomasz, Karwowski Woje[ciech], Karwowski Jędrzej, Karwowski Fran[ciszek]11 persons on 9 hearths
Eleven forenames, nine hearths — the figure 9 is confirmed by the card's total (9 + 3 + 1 + 4 = 17 = „Razem 17 d.”), so this is a discrepancy of the source. THE SCOPE OF THE ABBREVIATION „sukc.” IS AMBIGUOUS [reading uncertain]: „cz. sukc. Stan., Wawrz. i Franc.” can be read either as the successors of three persons at once (of Stanisław, of Wawrzyniec and of Franciszek), or as the successors of Stanisław alone, with Wawrzyniec and Franciszek still living; and the same with the second „sukc. Franc., Łuk. i Woje.”. I have taken the narrower reading — „sukc.” covers only the forename immediately following it — and I set the mark for a deceased person only for those two, Franciszek and Stanisław; on the wider reading the dead would number six. The forename „Woje.” is an abbreviation written on the card in just that way (not „Woyc.”), and I expand it to „Wojciech”. The surname „Karwowskich” is underlined, stands once at the end, and covers all those named.
the same entry also names: Karwowski Wawrz[yniec], Karwowski Fran[ciszek], Karwowski Fran[ciszek] †, Karwowski Łuk[asz], Karwowski Woje[ciech], Karwowski Marcin, Karwowski Tomasz, Karwowski Woje[ciech], Karwowski Jędrzej, Karwowski Fran[ciszek]11 persons on 9 hearths
Eleven forenames, nine hearths — the figure 9 is confirmed by the card's total (9 + 3 + 1 + 4 = 17 = „Razem 17 d.”), so this is a discrepancy of the source. THE SCOPE OF THE ABBREVIATION „sukc.” IS AMBIGUOUS [reading uncertain]: „cz. sukc. Stan., Wawrz. i Franc.” can be read either as the successors of three persons at once (of Stanisław, of Wawrzyniec and of Franciszek), or as the successors of Stanisław alone, with Wawrzyniec and Franciszek still living; and the same with the second „sukc. Franc., Łuk. i Woje.”. I have taken the narrower reading — „sukc.” covers only the forename immediately following it — and I set the mark for a deceased person only for those two, Franciszek and Stanisław; on the wider reading the dead would number six. The forename „Woje.” is an abbreviation written on the card in just that way (not „Woyc.”), and I expand it to „Wojciech”. The surname „Karwowskich” is underlined, stands once at the end, and covers all those named.
the same entry also names: Karwowski Stan[isław] †, Karwowski Wawrz[yniec], Karwowski Fran[ciszek], Karwowski Fran[ciszek] †, Karwowski Łuk[asz], Karwowski Woje[ciech], Karwowski Marcin, Karwowski Woje[ciech], Karwowski Jędrzej, Karwowski Fran[ciszek]11 persons on 9 hearths
Eleven forenames, nine hearths — the figure 9 is confirmed by the card's total (9 + 3 + 1 + 4 = 17 = „Razem 17 d.”), so this is a discrepancy of the source. THE SCOPE OF THE ABBREVIATION „sukc.” IS AMBIGUOUS [reading uncertain]: „cz. sukc. Stan., Wawrz. i Franc.” can be read either as the successors of three persons at once (of Stanisław, of Wawrzyniec and of Franciszek), or as the successors of Stanisław alone, with Wawrzyniec and Franciszek still living; and the same with the second „sukc. Franc., Łuk. i Woje.”. I have taken the narrower reading — „sukc.” covers only the forename immediately following it — and I set the mark for a deceased person only for those two, Franciszek and Stanisław; on the wider reading the dead would number six. The forename „Woje.” is an abbreviation written on the card in just that way (not „Woyc.”), and I expand it to „Wojciech”. The surname „Karwowskich” is underlined, stands once at the end, and covers all those named.
the same entry also names: Karwowski Stan[isław] †, Karwowski Fran[ciszek], Karwowski Fran[ciszek] †, Karwowski Łuk[asz], Karwowski Woje[ciech], Karwowski Marcin, Karwowski Tomasz, Karwowski Woje[ciech], Karwowski Jędrzej, Karwowski Fran[ciszek]11 persons on 9 hearths
Eleven forenames, nine hearths — the figure 9 is confirmed by the card's total (9 + 3 + 1 + 4 = 17 = „Razem 17 d.”), so this is a discrepancy of the source. THE SCOPE OF THE ABBREVIATION „sukc.” IS AMBIGUOUS [reading uncertain]: „cz. sukc. Stan., Wawrz. i Franc.” can be read either as the successors of three persons at once (of Stanisław, of Wawrzyniec and of Franciszek), or as the successors of Stanisław alone, with Wawrzyniec and Franciszek still living; and the same with the second „sukc. Franc., Łuk. i Woje.”. I have taken the narrower reading — „sukc.” covers only the forename immediately following it — and I set the mark for a deceased person only for those two, Franciszek and Stanisław; on the wider reading the dead would number six. The forename „Woje.” is an abbreviation written on the card in just that way (not „Woyc.”), and I expand it to „Wojciech”. The surname „Karwowskich” is underlined, stands once at the end, and covers all those named.
the same entry also names: Karwowski Stan[isław] †, Karwowski Wawrz[yniec], Karwowski Fran[ciszek], Karwowski Fran[ciszek] †, Karwowski Łuk[asz], Karwowski Marcin, Karwowski Tomasz, Karwowski Woje[ciech], Karwowski Jędrzej, Karwowski Fran[ciszek]11 persons on 9 hearths
Eleven forenames, nine hearths — the figure 9 is confirmed by the card's total (9 + 3 + 1 + 4 = 17 = „Razem 17 d.”), so this is a discrepancy of the source. THE SCOPE OF THE ABBREVIATION „sukc.” IS AMBIGUOUS [reading uncertain]: „cz. sukc. Stan., Wawrz. i Franc.” can be read either as the successors of three persons at once (of Stanisław, of Wawrzyniec and of Franciszek), or as the successors of Stanisław alone, with Wawrzyniec and Franciszek still living; and the same with the second „sukc. Franc., Łuk. i Woje.”. I have taken the narrower reading — „sukc.” covers only the forename immediately following it — and I set the mark for a deceased person only for those two, Franciszek and Stanisław; on the wider reading the dead would number six. The forename „Woje.” is an abbreviation written on the card in just that way (not „Woyc.”), and I expand it to „Wojciech”. The surname „Karwowskich” is underlined, stands once at the end, and covers all those named.
the same entry also names: Karwowski Stan[isław] †, Karwowski Wawrz[yniec], Karwowski Fran[ciszek], Karwowski Fran[ciszek] †, Karwowski Łuk[asz], Karwowski Woje[ciech], Karwowski Marcin, Karwowski Tomasz, Karwowski Jędrzej, Karwowski Fran[ciszek]11 persons on 9 hearths
Eleven forenames, nine hearths — the figure 9 is confirmed by the card's total (9 + 3 + 1 + 4 = 17 = „Razem 17 d.”), so this is a discrepancy of the source. THE SCOPE OF THE ABBREVIATION „sukc.” IS AMBIGUOUS [reading uncertain]: „cz. sukc. Stan., Wawrz. i Franc.” can be read either as the successors of three persons at once (of Stanisław, of Wawrzyniec and of Franciszek), or as the successors of Stanisław alone, with Wawrzyniec and Franciszek still living; and the same with the second „sukc. Franc., Łuk. i Woje.”. I have taken the narrower reading — „sukc.” covers only the forename immediately following it — and I set the mark for a deceased person only for those two, Franciszek and Stanisław; on the wider reading the dead would number six. The forename „Woje.” is an abbreviation written on the card in just that way (not „Woyc.”), and I expand it to „Wojciech”. The surname „Karwowskich” is underlined, stands once at the end, and covers all those named.
the same entry also names: Świerczowski Tom[asz], Świerczowski Fran[ciszek], Świerczowski Jędrz[ej], Świerczowski Jan5 persons on 3 hearths
The entry has two figures: „= 1 d.” is the partial total for the first three (Tomasz, Franciszek and Jędrzej together on one hearth), and „= 3 d.” is the total of the whole Świerczowski entry — 1 hearth of those three plus a hearth each for Jan and for Pawłowa. Counted so, the card's total closes: 9 + 3 + 1 + 4 = 17. „Pawłowej” is a form derived from the husband's name, without a forename of her own — a woman; I enter it literally in the recorded form of the name, and leave the surname in the form of the card (the masculine plural „Świerczowskich”), in accordance with the rule for collective entries.
the same entry also names: Świerczowski Tom[asz], Świerczowski Jędrz[ej], Świerczowski Jan, Świerczowski5 persons on 3 hearths
The entry has two figures: „= 1 d.” is the partial total for the first three (Tomasz, Franciszek and Jędrzej together on one hearth), and „= 3 d.” is the total of the whole Świerczowski entry — 1 hearth of those three plus a hearth each for Jan and for Pawłowa. Counted so, the card's total closes: 9 + 3 + 1 + 4 = 17. „Pawłowej” is a form derived from the husband's name, without a forename of her own — a woman; I enter it literally in the recorded form of the name, and leave the surname in the form of the card (the masculine plural „Świerczowskich”), in accordance with the rule for collective entries.
the same entry also names: Świerczowski Tom[asz], Świerczowski Fran[ciszek], Świerczowski Jędrz[ej], Świerczowski5 persons on 3 hearths
The entry has two figures: „= 1 d.” is the partial total for the first three (Tomasz, Franciszek and Jędrzej together on one hearth), and „= 3 d.” is the total of the whole Świerczowski entry — 1 hearth of those three plus a hearth each for Jan and for Pawłowa. Counted so, the card's total closes: 9 + 3 + 1 + 4 = 17. „Pawłowej” is a form derived from the husband's name, without a forename of her own — a woman; I enter it literally in the recorded form of the name, and leave the surname in the form of the card (the masculine plural „Świerczowskich”), in accordance with the rule for collective entries.
the same entry also names: Świerczowski Tom[asz], Świerczowski Fran[ciszek], Świerczowski Jan, Świerczowski5 persons on 3 hearths
The entry has two figures: „= 1 d.” is the partial total for the first three (Tomasz, Franciszek and Jędrzej together on one hearth), and „= 3 d.” is the total of the whole Świerczowski entry — 1 hearth of those three plus a hearth each for Jan and for Pawłowa. Counted so, the card's total closes: 9 + 3 + 1 + 4 = 17. „Pawłowej” is a form derived from the husband's name, without a forename of her own — a woman; I enter it literally in the recorded form of the name, and leave the surname in the form of the card (the masculine plural „Świerczowskich”), in accordance with the rule for collective entries.
the same entry also names: Świerczowski Fran[ciszek], Świerczowski Jędrz[ej], Świerczowski Jan, Świerczowski5 persons on 3 hearths
The entry has two figures: „= 1 d.” is the partial total for the first three (Tomasz, Franciszek and Jędrzej together on one hearth), and „= 3 d.” is the total of the whole Świerczowski entry — 1 hearth of those three plus a hearth each for Jan and for Pawłowa. Counted so, the card's total closes: 9 + 3 + 1 + 4 = 17. „Pawłowej” is a form derived from the husband's name, without a forename of her own — a woman; I enter it literally in the recorded form of the name, and leave the surname in the form of the card (the masculine plural „Świerczowskich”), in accordance with the rule for collective entries.
The only entry on the four cards with the order reversed (the surname before the forename). This is NOT Tomasz Radomyski, land scribe of Łuków (pisarz ziemski łukowski), known from Borki Świercze in the parish of Zbuczyn (the file `wies-swiercze.json`) — there it is another village, another forename, and the office is written out at every mention. Here the card gives no office at all.
the same entry also names: Zarzecki Ant[oni], Zarzecki Wawrz[yniec], Zarzecki Jędrzej4 persons on 4 hearths
Four possessors, four hearths — it agrees person for person. The same four stand in T90, entry 3, as „bracia Zarzyccy” on a single hearth only (there Andrzej instead of Jędrzej — the same forename in two forms), and in T₀89, entries 10, 11, 12 and 14, as four separate holdings. The surname on this card is „Zarzecki”, on cards 1) and 734 „Zarzycki”.
the same entry also names: Zarzecki Wawrz[yniec], Zarzecki Adam, Zarzecki Jędrzej4 persons on 4 hearths
Four possessors, four hearths — it agrees person for person. The same four stand in T90, entry 3, as „bracia Zarzyccy” on a single hearth only (there Andrzej instead of Jędrzej — the same forename in two forms), and in T₀89, entries 10, 11, 12 and 14, as four separate holdings. The surname on this card is „Zarzecki”, on cards 1) and 734 „Zarzycki”.
the same entry also names: Zarzecki Ant[oni], Zarzecki Wawrz[yniec], Zarzecki Adam4 persons on 4 hearths
Four possessors, four hearths — it agrees person for person. The same four stand in T90, entry 3, as „bracia Zarzyccy” on a single hearth only (there Andrzej instead of Jędrzej — the same forename in two forms), and in T₀89, entries 10, 11, 12 and 14, as four separate holdings. The surname on this card is „Zarzecki”, on cards 1) and 734 „Zarzycki”.
the same entry also names: Zarzecki Ant[oni], Zarzecki Adam, Zarzecki Jędrzej4 persons on 4 hearths
Four possessors, four hearths — it agrees person for person. The same four stand in T90, entry 3, as „bracia Zarzyccy” on a single hearth only (there Andrzej instead of Jędrzej — the same forename in two forms), and in T₀89, entries 10, 11, 12 and 14, as four separate holdings. The surname on this card is „Zarzecki”, on cards 1) and 734 „Zarzycki”.
1789 T₀89List of possessors of holdings of 1789
A WOMAN — the only one in this village named by a forename of her own as the possessor of a holding. The surname on the card is in the feminine form („Świerczowskiej”), the forename certain. This is most probably the same Ewa who in T90 and T94 stands as a life tenant on the holding of Jan Świerczowski („cz. Jana pod dożywociem Ewy”); here, in the list of possessors of 1789, she holds the holding in her own right.
The entry stands in the right-hand column of the card, level with entry 1, and is the only one to have the note about not sowing written out horizontally and in the singular („nie wysiewa”); the remaining sixteen are covered by a vertical brace with the addition in the plural („nie wysiewają 10 korcy”).
The same Jan Radomyski as in T89, entry 3 — without an office, one holding. Not to be confused with Tomasz Radomyski, land scribe of Łuków (pisarz ziemski łukowski), of Borki Świercze in the parish of Zbuczyn.
1790 T90Hearth tax register 1790
the same entry also names: Karwowski Tomasz, Karwowski Józef, Karwowski Szymon, Karwowski Wojciech, Karwowski Łukasz, Karwowski Wojciech, Karwowski Wawrzyniec, Karwowski Franciszek9 persons on 6 hearths
Eight possessors, six hearths — despite the record „po 1 dymie”. The figure 6 is underlined and confirmed by the card's total (6 + 2 + 1 + 2 + 1 = 12 = „Razem dymów 12”), so it is a discrepancy of the source, not an error of reading; T94 counts in the same way, giving the same eight Karwowskis 6 hearths. „Stanisławowej” is a form derived from the husband's name, without a forename of her own — a woman, a life tenant on Szymon's holding, not a possessor; I record her so that she is not lost from the index. The marker „/p. of./” [reading uncertain] — the strokes of the abbreviation are run together, only the „of.” is certain.
the same entry also names: Karwowski Tomasz, Karwowski Józef, Karwowski Szymon, Karwowska, Karwowski Wojciech, Karwowski Łukasz, Karwowski Wojciech, Karwowski Wawrzyniec9 persons on 6 hearths
Eight possessors, six hearths — despite the record „po 1 dymie”. The figure 6 is underlined and confirmed by the card's total (6 + 2 + 1 + 2 + 1 = 12 = „Razem dymów 12”), so it is a discrepancy of the source, not an error of reading; T94 counts in the same way, giving the same eight Karwowskis 6 hearths. „Stanisławowej” is a form derived from the husband's name, without a forename of her own — a woman, a life tenant on Szymon's holding, not a possessor; I record her so that she is not lost from the index. The marker „/p. of./” [reading uncertain] — the strokes of the abbreviation are run together, only the „of.” is certain.
the same entry also names: Karwowski Tomasz, Karwowski Szymon, Karwowska, Karwowski Wojciech, Karwowski Łukasz, Karwowski Wojciech, Karwowski Wawrzyniec, Karwowski Franciszek9 persons on 6 hearths
Eight possessors, six hearths — despite the record „po 1 dymie”. The figure 6 is underlined and confirmed by the card's total (6 + 2 + 1 + 2 + 1 = 12 = „Razem dymów 12”), so it is a discrepancy of the source, not an error of reading; T94 counts in the same way, giving the same eight Karwowskis 6 hearths. „Stanisławowej” is a form derived from the husband's name, without a forename of her own — a woman, a life tenant on Szymon's holding, not a possessor; I record her so that she is not lost from the index. The marker „/p. of./” [reading uncertain] — the strokes of the abbreviation are run together, only the „of.” is certain.
the same entry also names: Karwowski Tomasz, Karwowski Józef, Karwowski Szymon, Karwowska, Karwowski Wojciech, Karwowski Wojciech, Karwowski Wawrzyniec, Karwowski Franciszek9 persons on 6 hearths
Eight possessors, six hearths — despite the record „po 1 dymie”. The figure 6 is underlined and confirmed by the card's total (6 + 2 + 1 + 2 + 1 = 12 = „Razem dymów 12”), so it is a discrepancy of the source, not an error of reading; T94 counts in the same way, giving the same eight Karwowskis 6 hearths. „Stanisławowej” is a form derived from the husband's name, without a forename of her own — a woman, a life tenant on Szymon's holding, not a possessor; I record her so that she is not lost from the index. The marker „/p. of./” [reading uncertain] — the strokes of the abbreviation are run together, only the „of.” is certain.
son of Piotr
the same entry also names: Karwowski Tomasz, Karwowski Józef, Karwowska, Karwowski Wojciech, Karwowski Łukasz, Karwowski Wojciech, Karwowski Wawrzyniec, Karwowski Franciszek9 persons on 6 hearths
Eight possessors, six hearths — despite the record „po 1 dymie”. The figure 6 is underlined and confirmed by the card's total (6 + 2 + 1 + 2 + 1 = 12 = „Razem dymów 12”), so it is a discrepancy of the source, not an error of reading; T94 counts in the same way, giving the same eight Karwowskis 6 hearths. „Stanisławowej” is a form derived from the husband's name, without a forename of her own — a woman, a life tenant on Szymon's holding, not a possessor; I record her so that she is not lost from the index. The marker „/p. of./” [reading uncertain] — the strokes of the abbreviation are run together, only the „of.” is certain.
the same entry also names: Karwowski Józef, Karwowski Szymon, Karwowska, Karwowski Wojciech, Karwowski Łukasz, Karwowski Wojciech, Karwowski Wawrzyniec, Karwowski Franciszek9 persons on 6 hearths
Eight possessors, six hearths — despite the record „po 1 dymie”. The figure 6 is underlined and confirmed by the card's total (6 + 2 + 1 + 2 + 1 = 12 = „Razem dymów 12”), so it is a discrepancy of the source, not an error of reading; T94 counts in the same way, giving the same eight Karwowskis 6 hearths. „Stanisławowej” is a form derived from the husband's name, without a forename of her own — a woman, a life tenant on Szymon's holding, not a possessor; I record her so that she is not lost from the index. The marker „/p. of./” [reading uncertain] — the strokes of the abbreviation are run together, only the „of.” is certain.
the same entry also names: Karwowski Tomasz, Karwowski Józef, Karwowski Szymon, Karwowska, Karwowski Wojciech, Karwowski Łukasz, Karwowski Wojciech, Karwowski Franciszek9 persons on 6 hearths
Eight possessors, six hearths — despite the record „po 1 dymie”. The figure 6 is underlined and confirmed by the card's total (6 + 2 + 1 + 2 + 1 = 12 = „Razem dymów 12”), so it is a discrepancy of the source, not an error of reading; T94 counts in the same way, giving the same eight Karwowskis 6 hearths. „Stanisławowej” is a form derived from the husband's name, without a forename of her own — a woman, a life tenant on Szymon's holding, not a possessor; I record her so that she is not lost from the index. The marker „/p. of./” [reading uncertain] — the strokes of the abbreviation are run together, only the „of.” is certain.
the same entry also names: Karwowski Tomasz, Karwowski Józef, Karwowski Szymon, Karwowska, Karwowski Łukasz, Karwowski Wojciech, Karwowski Wawrzyniec, Karwowski Franciszek9 persons on 6 hearths
Eight possessors, six hearths — despite the record „po 1 dymie”. The figure 6 is underlined and confirmed by the card's total (6 + 2 + 1 + 2 + 1 = 12 = „Razem dymów 12”), so it is a discrepancy of the source, not an error of reading; T94 counts in the same way, giving the same eight Karwowskis 6 hearths. „Stanisławowej” is a form derived from the husband's name, without a forename of her own — a woman, a life tenant on Szymon's holding, not a possessor; I record her so that she is not lost from the index. The marker „/p. of./” [reading uncertain] — the strokes of the abbreviation are run together, only the „of.” is certain.
son of Franciszek
the same entry also names: Karwowski Tomasz, Karwowski Józef, Karwowski Szymon, Karwowska, Karwowski Wojciech, Karwowski Łukasz, Karwowski Wawrzyniec, Karwowski Franciszek9 persons on 6 hearths
Eight possessors, six hearths — despite the record „po 1 dymie”. The figure 6 is underlined and confirmed by the card's total (6 + 2 + 1 + 2 + 1 = 12 = „Razem dymów 12”), so it is a discrepancy of the source, not an error of reading; T94 counts in the same way, giving the same eight Karwowskis 6 hearths. „Stanisławowej” is a form derived from the husband's name, without a forename of her own — a woman, a life tenant on Szymon's holding, not a possessor; I record her so that she is not lost from the index. The marker „/p. of./” [reading uncertain] — the strokes of the abbreviation are run together, only the „of.” is certain.
son of Piotr
the same entry also names: Świerczowski Jan, Świerczowski Franciszek, Świerczowski Tomasz, Świerczowski Andrzej5 persons on 2 hearths
Four possessors (Jan, Franciszek, Tomasz, Andrzej), two hearths — the figure 2 is underlined and confirmed by the card's total. Ewa is not a possessor, but a life tenant on Jan's holding; she is a woman and the card gives her own forename, so I record it in the recorded form of the name literally as it stands, in the genitive („Ewy”), and the surname in the feminine form. The same addition about Ewa is repeated by T94, but there her forename is struck out.
the card gives a forename of her own: Ewa
the same entry also names: Świerczowski Jan, Świerczowska, Świerczowski Franciszek, Świerczowski Tomasz5 persons on 2 hearths
Four possessors (Jan, Franciszek, Tomasz, Andrzej), two hearths — the figure 2 is underlined and confirmed by the card's total. Ewa is not a possessor, but a life tenant on Jan's holding; she is a woman and the card gives her own forename, so I record it in the recorded form of the name literally as it stands, in the genitive („Ewy”), and the surname in the feminine form. The same addition about Ewa is repeated by T94, but there her forename is struck out.
the same entry also names: Świerczowski Jan, Świerczowska, Świerczowski Tomasz, Świerczowski Andrzej5 persons on 2 hearths
Four possessors (Jan, Franciszek, Tomasz, Andrzej), two hearths — the figure 2 is underlined and confirmed by the card's total. Ewa is not a possessor, but a life tenant on Jan's holding; she is a woman and the card gives her own forename, so I record it in the recorded form of the name literally as it stands, in the genitive („Ewy”), and the surname in the feminine form. The same addition about Ewa is repeated by T94, but there her forename is struck out.
the same entry also names: Świerczowska, Świerczowski Franciszek, Świerczowski Tomasz, Świerczowski Andrzej5 persons on 2 hearths
Four possessors (Jan, Franciszek, Tomasz, Andrzej), two hearths — the figure 2 is underlined and confirmed by the card's total. Ewa is not a possessor, but a life tenant on Jan's holding; she is a woman and the card gives her own forename, so I record it in the recorded form of the name literally as it stands, in the genitive („Ewy”), and the surname in the feminine form. The same addition about Ewa is repeated by T94, but there her forename is struck out.
the same entry also names: Świerczowski Jan, Świerczowska, Świerczowski Franciszek, Świerczowski Andrzej5 persons on 2 hearths
Four possessors (Jan, Franciszek, Tomasz, Andrzej), two hearths — the figure 2 is underlined and confirmed by the card's total. Ewa is not a possessor, but a life tenant on Jan's holding; she is a woman and the card gives her own forename, so I record it in the recorded form of the name literally as it stands, in the genitive („Ewy”), and the surname in the feminine form. The same addition about Ewa is repeated by T94, but there her forename is struck out.
the same entry also names: Zarzycki Andrzej, Zarzycki Antoni, Zarzycki Wawrzyniec4 persons on 1 hearth
Four brothers on one hearth — the card says so outright („braci … dym 1”), so this is not a discrepancy. The surname on this card is „Zarzycki”; T89 and T₀89 write „Zarzecki”.
the same entry also names: Zarzycki Antoni, Zarzycki Wawrzyniec, Zarzycki Adam4 persons on 1 hearth
Four brothers on one hearth — the card says so outright („braci … dym 1”), so this is not a discrepancy. The surname on this card is „Zarzycki”; T89 and T₀89 write „Zarzecki”.
the same entry also names: Zarzycki Andrzej, Zarzycki Wawrzyniec, Zarzycki Adam4 persons on 1 hearth
Four brothers on one hearth — the card says so outright („braci … dym 1”), so this is not a discrepancy. The surname on this card is „Zarzycki”; T89 and T₀89 write „Zarzecki”.
the same entry also names: Zarzycki Andrzej, Zarzycki Antoni, Zarzycki Adam4 persons on 1 hearth
Four brothers on one hearth — the card says so outright („braci … dym 1”), so this is not a discrepancy. The surname on this card is „Zarzycki”; T89 and T₀89 write „Zarzecki”.
the same entry also names: Kurowski Marcin2 persons on 2 hearths
The forename „Franciszka” is struck out with a single stroke, but the number of hearths (2, underlined) answers to two parties: the successors of Franciszek and Marcin, a hearth to each. The same pair is repeated by T94, entry 3 („cz. Marcina i sukc. po Franc. Kurowskim – po 1 dymie – 2”), there without the striking out — which confirms that the two holdings count separately.
the same entry also names: Kurowski Franciszek †2 persons on 2 hearths
The forename „Franciszka” is struck out with a single stroke, but the number of hearths (2, underlined) answers to two parties: the successors of Franciszek and Marcin, a hearth to each. The same pair is repeated by T94, entry 3 („cz. Marcina i sukc. po Franc. Kurowskim – po 1 dymie – 2”), there without the striking out — which confirms that the two holdings count separately.
the same entry also names: Dembowski Ignacy, Dembowski Wawrzyniec †3 persons on 1 hearth
Three parties on one hearth. The surname in this entry is written in the singular „Dembowskiego”, although it refers to all three; the addition in blue below this line gives it in the plural and with an „ę”: „Dębowskich”. I record the form of the black line („Dembowski”), the discrepancy of the writing being noted.
the same entry also names: Dembowski Adam, Dembowski Wawrzyniec †3 persons on 1 hearth
Three parties on one hearth. The surname in this entry is written in the singular „Dembowskiego”, although it refers to all three; the addition in blue below this line gives it in the plural and with an „ę”: „Dębowskich”. I record the form of the black line („Dembowski”), the discrepancy of the writing being noted.
the same entry also names: Dembowski Adam, Dembowski Ignacy3 persons on 1 hearth
Three parties on one hearth. The surname in this entry is written in the singular „Dembowskiego”, although it refers to all three; the addition in blue below this line gives it in the plural and with an „ę”: „Dębowskich”. I record the form of the black line („Dembowski”), the discrepancy of the writing being noted.
1794 T94Hearth tax register 1794
the same entry also names: Karwowski Józef, Karwowski Łukasz, Karwowski Wojciech, Karwowski Szymon, Karwowski Tomasz, Karwowski Wawrzyniec, Karwowski Fran[ciszek], Karwowski Wojciech9 persons on 6 hearths
Eight possessors, six hearths — exactly as in T90, entry 1, and with the same eight-person composition, only differently arranged. The figure 6 was checked at an eightfold magnification (one bowl and a whisker from above — that is a „6”, not an „8”). „Wojciechowej” is a form derived from the husband's name, without a forename of her own — a woman, a life tenant on Szymon's holding; in T90 in the same place stands „Stanisławowej”, that is, between 1790 and 1794 the life tenure passed to another widow, or one of the two readings of the card index is a mistake.
the same entry also names: Karwowski Józef, Karwowski Łukasz, Karwowski Wojciech, Karwowski Szymon, Karwowska, Karwowski Tomasz, Karwowski Wawrzyniec, Karwowski Wojciech9 persons on 6 hearths
Eight possessors, six hearths — exactly as in T90, entry 1, and with the same eight-person composition, only differently arranged. The figure 6 was checked at an eightfold magnification (one bowl and a whisker from above — that is a „6”, not an „8”). „Wojciechowej” is a form derived from the husband's name, without a forename of her own — a woman, a life tenant on Szymon's holding; in T90 in the same place stands „Stanisławowej”, that is, between 1790 and 1794 the life tenure passed to another widow, or one of the two readings of the card index is a mistake.
the same entry also names: Karwowski Łukasz, Karwowski Wojciech, Karwowski Szymon, Karwowska, Karwowski Tomasz, Karwowski Wawrzyniec, Karwowski Fran[ciszek], Karwowski Wojciech9 persons on 6 hearths
Eight possessors, six hearths — exactly as in T90, entry 1, and with the same eight-person composition, only differently arranged. The figure 6 was checked at an eightfold magnification (one bowl and a whisker from above — that is a „6”, not an „8”). „Wojciechowej” is a form derived from the husband's name, without a forename of her own — a woman, a life tenant on Szymon's holding; in T90 in the same place stands „Stanisławowej”, that is, between 1790 and 1794 the life tenure passed to another widow, or one of the two readings of the card index is a mistake.
the same entry also names: Karwowski Józef, Karwowski Wojciech, Karwowski Szymon, Karwowska, Karwowski Tomasz, Karwowski Wawrzyniec, Karwowski Fran[ciszek], Karwowski Wojciech9 persons on 6 hearths
Eight possessors, six hearths — exactly as in T90, entry 1, and with the same eight-person composition, only differently arranged. The figure 6 was checked at an eightfold magnification (one bowl and a whisker from above — that is a „6”, not an „8”). „Wojciechowej” is a form derived from the husband's name, without a forename of her own — a woman, a life tenant on Szymon's holding; in T90 in the same place stands „Stanisławowej”, that is, between 1790 and 1794 the life tenure passed to another widow, or one of the two readings of the card index is a mistake.
after Piotr
the same entry also names: Karwowski Józef, Karwowski Łukasz, Karwowski Wojciech, Karwowska, Karwowski Tomasz, Karwowski Wawrzyniec, Karwowski Fran[ciszek], Karwowski Wojciech9 persons on 6 hearths
Eight possessors, six hearths — exactly as in T90, entry 1, and with the same eight-person composition, only differently arranged. The figure 6 was checked at an eightfold magnification (one bowl and a whisker from above — that is a „6”, not an „8”). „Wojciechowej” is a form derived from the husband's name, without a forename of her own — a woman, a life tenant on Szymon's holding; in T90 in the same place stands „Stanisławowej”, that is, between 1790 and 1794 the life tenure passed to another widow, or one of the two readings of the card index is a mistake.
the same entry also names: Karwowski Józef, Karwowski Łukasz, Karwowski Wojciech, Karwowski Szymon, Karwowska, Karwowski Wawrzyniec, Karwowski Fran[ciszek], Karwowski Wojciech9 persons on 6 hearths
Eight possessors, six hearths — exactly as in T90, entry 1, and with the same eight-person composition, only differently arranged. The figure 6 was checked at an eightfold magnification (one bowl and a whisker from above — that is a „6”, not an „8”). „Wojciechowej” is a form derived from the husband's name, without a forename of her own — a woman, a life tenant on Szymon's holding; in T90 in the same place stands „Stanisławowej”, that is, between 1790 and 1794 the life tenure passed to another widow, or one of the two readings of the card index is a mistake.
the same entry also names: Karwowski Józef, Karwowski Łukasz, Karwowski Wojciech, Karwowski Szymon, Karwowska, Karwowski Tomasz, Karwowski Fran[ciszek], Karwowski Wojciech9 persons on 6 hearths
Eight possessors, six hearths — exactly as in T90, entry 1, and with the same eight-person composition, only differently arranged. The figure 6 was checked at an eightfold magnification (one bowl and a whisker from above — that is a „6”, not an „8”). „Wojciechowej” is a form derived from the husband's name, without a forename of her own — a woman, a life tenant on Szymon's holding; in T90 in the same place stands „Stanisławowej”, that is, between 1790 and 1794 the life tenure passed to another widow, or one of the two readings of the card index is a mistake.
the same entry also names: Karwowski Józef, Karwowski Łukasz, Karwowski Szymon, Karwowska, Karwowski Tomasz, Karwowski Wawrzyniec, Karwowski Fran[ciszek], Karwowski Wojciech9 persons on 6 hearths
Eight possessors, six hearths — exactly as in T90, entry 1, and with the same eight-person composition, only differently arranged. The figure 6 was checked at an eightfold magnification (one bowl and a whisker from above — that is a „6”, not an „8”). „Wojciechowej” is a form derived from the husband's name, without a forename of her own — a woman, a life tenant on Szymon's holding; in T90 in the same place stands „Stanisławowej”, that is, between 1790 and 1794 the life tenure passed to another widow, or one of the two readings of the card index is a mistake.
after Piotr
the same entry also names: Karwowski Józef, Karwowski Łukasz, Karwowski Wojciech, Karwowski Szymon, Karwowska, Karwowski Tomasz, Karwowski Wawrzyniec, Karwowski Fran[ciszek]9 persons on 6 hearths
Eight possessors, six hearths — exactly as in T90, entry 1, and with the same eight-person composition, only differently arranged. The figure 6 was checked at an eightfold magnification (one bowl and a whisker from above — that is a „6”, not an „8”). „Wojciechowej” is a form derived from the husband's name, without a forename of her own — a woman, a life tenant on Szymon's holding; in T90 in the same place stands „Stanisławowej”, that is, between 1790 and 1794 the life tenure passed to another widow, or one of the two readings of the card index is a mistake.
after Franciszek
the same entry also names: Świerczowski Jan, Świerczowski Fran[ciszek], Świerczowski Tomasz, Świerczowski Andrzej5 persons on 2 hearths
Four possessors, two hearths — as in T90, entry 2. The forename of the life tenant („Ewy”) is struck out here, in T90 it was not; I record her nonetheless, because it is she who is named in the source. The sign „"” after the figure is a repetition mark standing in for the word „dymów”.
the forename struck out on the card; the card gives a forename of her own: Ewa
the same entry also names: Świerczowski Jan, Świerczowska, Świerczowski Fran[ciszek], Świerczowski Tomasz5 persons on 2 hearths
Four possessors, two hearths — as in T90, entry 2. The forename of the life tenant („Ewy”) is struck out here, in T90 it was not; I record her nonetheless, because it is she who is named in the source. The sign „"” after the figure is a repetition mark standing in for the word „dymów”.
the same entry also names: Świerczowski Jan, Świerczowska, Świerczowski Tomasz, Świerczowski Andrzej5 persons on 2 hearths
Four possessors, two hearths — as in T90, entry 2. The forename of the life tenant („Ewy”) is struck out here, in T90 it was not; I record her nonetheless, because it is she who is named in the source. The sign „"” after the figure is a repetition mark standing in for the word „dymów”.
the same entry also names: Świerczowska, Świerczowski Fran[ciszek], Świerczowski Tomasz, Świerczowski Andrzej5 persons on 2 hearths
Four possessors, two hearths — as in T90, entry 2. The forename of the life tenant („Ewy”) is struck out here, in T90 it was not; I record her nonetheless, because it is she who is named in the source. The sign „"” after the figure is a repetition mark standing in for the word „dymów”.
the same entry also names: Świerczowski Jan, Świerczowska, Świerczowski Fran[ciszek], Świerczowski Andrzej5 persons on 2 hearths
Four possessors, two hearths — as in T90, entry 2. The forename of the life tenant („Ewy”) is struck out here, in T90 it was not; I record her nonetheless, because it is she who is named in the source. The sign „"” after the figure is a repetition mark standing in for the word „dymów”.
the same entry also names: Kurowski Marcin2 persons on 2 hearths
Two parties, a hearth to each — the same pair as in T90, entry 4, there with the forename Franciszek struck out.
the same entry also names: Kurowski Fran[ciszek] †2 persons on 2 hearths
Two parties, a hearth to each — the same pair as in T90, entry 4, there with the forename Franciszek struck out.
This locality in the full edition of the hearth-tax registers — together with a search across all persons, a modern map, Perthées’s engraving of 1786 and a statistical summary.
