Home › Castle court records / Old sources › The hearth-tax registers 1775–1794 › Kownatki
Hearth Tax Registers of the Łuków Land 1775–1794
Kownatki
Parish of Łuków, łukowski county.
Dear reader, remember that this is an AI study, that it may contain errors; treat it as indicative and verify it for yourself.
Offices: Jackowski (deputy cupbearer of Kiev, podczaszy kijowski)
Propination, inns, breweries: Jackowski Kajetan (brewery, inn)
More than five hearths in one hand: Jackowski Kajetan (23)
Extracts from outside the registers
Records under sigla which the card index does not expand. They give no hearths, so they enter no total.
note: The siglum „MP” is outside the list of sources — it does not enter the reckoning of hearths. The line is of one word, the reading certain. It is worth setting beside the gradation which MP uses elsewhere: Łuków „miasto”, Zbuczyn and Trzebieszów „miasteczko”, Klimki (card 1) „do dzierżawy gręzowskiej”, and Kownatki simply „królewszczyzna”, a royal holding — without any indication of the estate complex (klucz) to which it belongs, although T90 and O83 of the same card say that Kownatki IS a separate lease („należą do niej tylko Kownatki”).
note: The siglum „Ls.89” is outside the list of sources — it does not enter the reckoning of hearths; and so this card is not in the reckoning of hearths at all. The extract gives not a single hearth. A WORD FROM THE WATCHED THREE — „karczma”: the reading is CERTAIN, the word written out IN FULL (not abbreviated), in a clean place in the line; checked with one magnification. It served me as the model by which I recognized the abbreviation „karcz.” in the Ls.89 of Klimki on card 1). There is here neither a brewery nor propination — a brewery is named only by T89 on card 1). ADDITIONS AND DELETIONS, rendered in the text with angle brackets: (a) above „Kajetana Jackowskiego” there is added between the lines „podczaszego kijowskiego” — in agreement with O83 on card 1); (b) the addition „obecnie trzyma to wś. Antoni Sobolewski”, taken in on the card by a brace; (c) above the word „sapowaty” an interlinear addition which I read as „piaszczysty” [READING UNCERTAIN — it can just as well be read „piaszczysta”/„pastwiska”; the addition is partly struck out]; (d) in the line about the meadows the word „łąki” is written a second time and STRUCK OUT, and after it „małe”. UNCERTAIN READINGS of this extract, listed separately: (1) „iure communicati[vo]” — the ending of the Latin formula runs onto the right-hand margin of the frame, the formula itself is legible; (2) „żwirkowaty” [reading uncertain — a word describing the land; „-owaty” and the opening „ż/z” are legible]; (3) the beginning of the line after „małe” is lost in the seam between strips c and d of the frame, hence the ellipsis before „w lasach”; the stitching of the two strips showed only that this line ends with the words „pod Stryjowem”; (4) THE PLACE NAMES — „Stryjowem”, „stryjewskiego”, „Piawka”, „Tołko”, „Żakowola”, „Zakrzew”, „Domanin” — ALL OF THEM [reading uncertain]; I have checked them in `SLOWNIK-OKOLICY.md` and none of them is there, so I have nothing to set them against and I record them as they stand on the card, without straining them towards present-day names (for example towards Kąkolewnica or Żakowola near Radzyń). Certain is only the adjective „kąkolewnickiego” beside the starosty. (5) „ciągną się” [reading uncertain — possibly „sięgają się”].
note: The continuation of the Ls.89 extract from card 2), taken up in the middle of a sentence: „…a tylko z jednej” (card 2) + „strony ⟨…⟩, w drugiej bór sosnowy” (card 3). It is this seam, and no number, that sets the two cards in order. READING UNCERTAIN: the word standing after „strony” I have NOT read, and I do not put a conjecture in its place. After one magnification six–seven signs are visible, with two clear rising loops towards the end and a termination in „-e”; „ocalałe” and „osiadłe” suggest themselves, but neither of them can I confirm from the frame, and so I leave a gap. The rest of the line („w drugiej bór sosnowy przy nim dość choiny młodej”) is legible; the word „choina” occurs by the same hand and in the same sense in the Ls of Łuków on card 9), which confirms the reading.
note: The siglum „St.89” is outside the list of sources (as on card 8) at Łuków) — it does not enter the reckoning of hearths, although it gives figures of population. the hearths figure null: this is a census of souls, not a hearth register. THE ARITHMETICAL CHECK COMES OUT TO A SINGLE PERSON AND CONFIRMS THE WHOLE READING OF THE FIGURES, and so I did not look at them a second time: householders 16 + 18 + 18 + 23 = 75, lodgers and servants 5 + 5 + 5 + 4 = 19, beggars 2 + 1 = 3; together 75 + 19 + 3 = 97, exactly what the total „97 l.” gives; independently the division by sex agrees as well: 46 m. + 51 k. = 97. In the line about the lodgers the last figure is reworked on the card (beneath „4 cór.” an earlier, struck-out writing is visible) — THE RECKONING DECIDES: with 4 the total comes out at exactly 97, with any other figure it does not, and so „4” holds. A NOTE FOR THE COMPARISON: St.89 gives 97 people, and S87 from card 1) — 138 (127 + 11 ż.). This is NOT a discrepancy to be smoothed over: these are two different sources and two different years, and St.89 most probably does not count Jews and counts otherwise than the parish census of 1787. Both figures I leave as they stand.
spellings on the cards: Kownatki, Kownatek
district of łukowski · parish of Łuków · cards 1), 2), 3)
a royal village, of the life lease of Kajetan Jackowski, deputy cupbearer of Kiev (podczaszy kijowski); a manor house, a brewery, an inn, 13 cottages with 1 householder, 3 empty cottages and 4 further cottages = 23 hearths; a village headmanship on a levy man's łan (łan wybraniecki); the land boggy, in part gravelly, boggy meadows, the forests for the greater part laid waste [O83 (IX), T89, Ls.89]
| Year | Source | Entries | Hearths |
|---|---|---|---|
| T75 | Hearth tax register 1775 | 1 | 25 |
| T89 | Hearth tax register 1789 | 1 | 23 |
| T90 | Hearth tax register 1790 | 1 | 23 |
Without an extract for 1794 — no card of this village carries that tariff. It is a missing extract in the card index, not a gap in the numbering of the cards.
The card-index entries
Every extract for this locality in the wording of the cards, year by year. One block is one occurrence: this person, in this year. At a collective item the same card text stands beside every person named — because the card names them together and they must not be separated. The hearths given at a collective item are an equal division among those named, not a reading.
1789 T89Hearth tax register 1789
1790 T90Hearth tax register 1790
The register of 1790 does not break the village into holdings: the whole village is one lease in the possession of Kajetan Jackowski. The figure „23” on the card is UNDERLINED; the reading is confirmed by the reckoning, for T89 of the same card arrives at the same 23 hearths, setting them out building by building. The interjection „należą do niej tylko Kownatki” is important: the Kownatki lease did not take in other villages, unlike the neighbouring Gręzówka lease, to which the card index assigns Klimki (card 1).
O83 O83A description of 1783 [the expansion of the siglum to be confirmed]
A description of the village from O83, section (IX). Without hearths. The line runs across the seam between strips c and d of the frame; it is visible in full on strip d. The office „podczaszy kijowski” recurs as an interlinear addition in Ls.89 on card 2), which confirms the reading.
In this extract the card gives the surname and the office alone, without the forename; the forename „Kajetan” is carried by T90 and T89 of the same card and by both extracts on cards 2) and 667, but here I do not add it — I leave as much as this line says.
This locality in the full edition of the hearth-tax registers — together with a search across all persons, a modern map, Perthées’s engraving of 1786 and a statistical summary.
