The surname is written with a stroke over the „a”: „Maścibrodzkiego”. In T90 on the same card the same man occurs as „Maszczybrodzki”.
Home › Castle court records / Old sources › The hearth-tax registers 1775–1794 › Surnames › Maszczybrodzki
Hearth Tax Registers of the Łuków Land 1775–1794
Maszczybrodzki
separate records 12 · places 7 · registers 1775, 1789, 1790, 1794
Dear reader, remember that this is an AI study, that it may contain errors; treat it as indicative and verify it for yourself.
„Separate entries for persons” means: separate entries of a given name with a surname and a byname, not persons proved to have existed. The same man recorded in four registers is one entry, but two namesakes from the same village are sometimes impossible to tell apart, and over twenty years a parcel could pass to a son of the same name. The hearths given at a collective entry are an equal division among those named — a calculation, not a reading.
| Year | Source | Entries | Persons | Hearths |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1775 | Hearth tax register 1775 | 4 | 4 | 4,0 |
| 1789 | Hearth tax register 1789 | 7 | 7 | 6,0 |
| 1789 | List of possessors of holdings of 1789 | 6 | 6 | — |
| 1790 | Hearth tax register 1790 | 7 | 7 | 6,0 |
| 1794 | Hearth tax register 1794 | 8 | 8 | 7,0 |
The year 1789 stands twice in the table, and rightly so: these are two different sources. The register gives the hearths, the list of parcel-holders does not — which is why the list carries a dash and not a zero, and the hearths of 1789 are not counted twice.
Where the surname occurs
The localities in which the card file records this surname, with the number of entries and of the hearths falling to it in each village.
- CielemęcZbuczynrecords 9 · hearths 7,0
- GołowierzchyTrzebieszówrecords 4 · hearths 3,0
- GrochówkaTrzebieszówrecords 5 · hearths 4,0
- Radzików WielkiZbuczynrecords 5 · hearths 3,0
- RoleŁukówrecords 5 · hearths 3,0
- SobiczeZbuczynrecords 1 · hearths 1,0
- ZalesieŁukówrecords 3 · hearths 2,0
The card-index entries
All the extracts for this surname in the wording of the cards. One block is one occurrence: this person, in this register. In a collective entry the same text of the card stands beside every person named — because the card names them together, and they must not be separated.
CielemęcZbuczyn parish
the same entry also names: Maszczybrodzki Szymon2 persons on 2 hearths
The same pair — Stefan and Szymon Maszczybrodzki, one hearth each — also stands in T90.
the same entry also names: Maszczybrodzki Stefan2 persons on 2 hearths
The same pair — Stefan and Szymon Maszczybrodzki, one hearth each — also stands in T90.
the same entry also names: Maszczybrodzki Szymon2 persons on 2 hearths
The marks of repetition („) stand for the formula „dymów wiejskich 2giej klasy” of entry A.
the same entry also names: Maszczybrodzki Stefan2 persons on 2 hearths
The marks of repetition („) stand for the formula „dymów wiejskich 2giej klasy” of entry A.
Added in a smaller hand in the same line as entry 2, without repeating the word „cz.”; its own number of hearths („1 d.”, underlined) requires counting it as a separate holding.
GołowierzchyTrzebieszów parish
GrochówkaTrzebieszów parish
The surname is transcribed as it stands on the card („Mosczybrodzkiego”); the nominative „Mosczybrodzki” [reading uncertain] — probably „Moszczybrodzki”, but the card has only one „z” between the „s” and the „y”.
The first entry of the left-hand column below the stroke. The reservation „nie wysiewają 10 korcy” is written vertically in the margin and covers the whole column (entries 6–12).
Here the surname is legibly „Maszczybrodzkiego”; the same person (Franciszek) in T75, entry 12, on card 2) is written „Mosczybrodzkiego”. Two spellings from the same hand — to be resolved by the owner of the card index; I leave both as they stand.
Radzików WielkiZbuczyn parish
the same entry also names: Maszczybrodzki Walenty2 persons on 1 hearth
two persons to one hearth — the card reckons one manor house for both brothers. The surname on this card is written out distinctly („Maszczybrodzkich”) and confirms the reading of entry C in T90.
the same entry also names: Maszczybrodzki Jakub2 persons on 1 hearth
two persons to one hearth — the card reckons one manor house for both brothers. The surname on this card is written out distinctly („Maszczybrodzkich”) and confirms the reading of entry C in T90.
the right-hand column
on the card the surname stands before the forename, and the forename in the nominative („Władysław”), not in the genitive as in the neighbouring entries; through the word runs a line leading to the column of hearths (most probably a rule drawn earlier, not a deletion). The reading of the surname is CONFIRMED twice in the same village: T89 4) on card 4) („Jakuba i Walentego Maszczybrodzkich”) and T94 on card 7) („cz. Władysława Maszczybrodzkiego 1 d.”, the extract of agent C) — the latter confirms the forename as well.
Roleparafia Łuków
[reading uncertain] — after the first letter (the same as the „M” in „Michała”) comes „a”, then a group read as „szczy”, then „brodzkiego”. It may be a writing of the surname taken from the village of Mościbrody (Mościbrodzki), but the letters „ości” are not to be seen on the card, and so I do not bend the reading to that form. The number of hearths is certain.
the same entry also names: Maszczybrodzki Maciej2 persons on 1 hearth
TWO persons, ONE hearth — so it stands on the card („dym 1”, the figure underlined); the total of the whole register (55) confirms that one. The card does not explain the discrepancy.
the same entry also names: Maszczybrodzki Jakób2 persons on 1 hearth
TWO persons, ONE hearth — so it stands on the card („dym 1”, the figure underlined); the total of the whole register (55) confirms that one. The card does not explain the discrepancy.
the same entry also names: Maszczybrodzki Maciej2 persons on 1 hearth
Two persons on one hearth — T90 counts it in the same way on card 5) („cz. Macieja i Jakóba Maszczybrodzkich /n. pł. of./ dym 1”).
the same entry also names: Maszczybrodzki Jakób2 persons on 1 hearth
Two persons on one hearth — T90 counts it in the same way on card 5) („cz. Macieja i Jakóba Maszczybrodzkich /n. pł. of./ dym 1”).
SobiczeZbuczyn parish
The surname written without diacritical marks: „Mosczybrodzkiego”. The form is attested in this neighbourhood (SLOWNIK-OKOLICY: „Mosczybrodzki”, beside „Maszczybrodzki” and „Maścibrodzki”), so I do not straighten it into „Mościbrodzki”. The string of letters between „Mos-” and „-brodzkiego” I read as „czy”; the distinction of „cz” from „ci” in this hand is not certain [reading uncertain]. The person occurs here alone — in the T₉₀, T₈₉ and T₉₄ of this village there is no such person.
Zalesieparafia Łuków
The surname written with a thicker pen, the beginning of the word written over a previous stroke [reading uncertain as to the first syllable]; the form „Maszczybrodzki” is confirmed by T94, entry 14 (card 5), and T₀89, entry 15 (card 9).
The annotation „nie wysiewają 10 korcy” DOES NOT STAND BESIDE THIS ENTRY SEPARATELY: alongside it runs a VERTICAL BRACE at the right-hand edge of the left column, with the text written from the bottom upwards, covering entries 13–23 — see the note to card 9). ¶ The surname with a correction: the beginning of the word struck out and written over with a thicker pen [the reading of the first syllable uncertain]; the form „Maszczybrodzki” is confirmed by T94, entry 14, and T89, entry 10.
THE FIGURE BESIDE THIS ENTRY IS NOT LEGIBLE: the dotted leader runs right up to the summation rule and the figure in the right-hand column is lost in it. The figure 1 follows from the reckoning: the thirteen remaining entries give 45, and the card gives „Razem – 46 dymów”. In accordance with the rule („rachunek zastępuje oglądanie” — the reckoning takes the place of looking) I take it to be 1.
This surname in full edition of the hearth-tax registers — together with the search across all persons, the comparison of figures through the registers, the modern map and the Perthées engraving of 1786.
