Home › Castle court records / Old sources › The hearth-tax registers 1775–1794 › Jurki
Hearth Tax Registers of the Łuków Land 1775–1794
Jurki
Parish of Trzebieszów, łukowski county.
Dear reader, remember that this is an AI study, that it may contain errors; treat it as indicative and verify it for yourself.
Propination, inns, breweries: Chromiński Maciej (brewery, inn, propination); Kurczewicz Fabian (inn)
More than five hearths in one hand: Turski (10); Chromiński Maciej (7); Chromiński Michał (7)
spellings on the cards: Jurki
district of łukowski · parish of Trzebieszów · cards 1), 2), 3), 4), 5), 6), 7)
a village in which the nobility hold holdings; for the greater part the property of Zakrzewski, the rest held by „bracia szlachta”, the brother nobles; described under the parish of Ułan, although the parish priest there notes that it does not belong to his parish [O83 (IX)]
| Year | Source | Entries | Hearths |
|---|---|---|---|
| T75 | Hearth tax register 1775 | 11 | 28 |
| T89 | Hearth tax register 1789 | 11 | 24 |
| T90 | Hearth tax register 1790 | 13 | 25 |
| T94 | Hearth tax register 1794 | 12 | 25 |
Caveats on the years' registers (5)
What the compiler noted beside the entry itself, and what the table above does not show:
- T75 — The register is set out on two cards: items 1–6 (with the number „3” repeated) on card 1), items 7–10 on card 2) („T75 (c.d.)”). The total „Ogółem: dymów: 28.” is given by card 2). The numbering of the items on card 1) runs 1, 2, 3, 3, 4, 5, 6 — the figure „3” stands twice; the second I record as „3 [bis]”.
- T89 — The entry is written in blue ink, in a different hand from the rest of the card, in two columns and without numbering of the items; the numbers 1–11 I assign in the order of reading (first the left column, then the right). The card's own total: „Razem 24 d.”
- T₀89 — A list of possessors of holdings of 1789, without hearths. The items are unnumbered — the numbering 1–20 is editorial, in the order of reading: two items across the whole width of the card, then the left column (12), then the right (6). The braces with the addition „nie wysiewają 10 korcy” cover both columns, but not items 1–2.
- T90 — The register is set out on two cards: items 1–11 on card 3), items 12–13 on card 4) („T90 c.d.”). The total „Razem dymów 25” (doubly underlined) is given by card 4).
- T94 — The register is set out on two cards: items 1–5 on card 5), items 6–12 on card 6) („T94 – c.d.”). The card does not number the items — the numbers 1–12 I assign in the order in which they are written. The total „Razem 25 dymów” (doubly underlined) is given by card 6).
The card-index entries
Every extract for this locality in the wording of the cards, year by year. One block is one occurrence: this person, in this year. At a collective item the same card text stands beside every person named — because the card names them together and they must not be separated. The hearths given at a collective item are an equal division among those named, not a reading.
1775 T75Hearth tax register 1775
the same entry also names: Grochowski Józef2 persons on 2 hearths
the same entry also names: Grochowski Jan2 persons on 2 hearths
the same entry also names: Rola Stanisław2 persons on 2 hearths
the surname in two forms: here the adjectival genitive singular „Rolego”, in T90, entry 4, the nominal genitive plural „Rolów” — the same two persons (Stanisław and Bartłomiej). I take the nominative to be „Rola”; the standard form is to be resolved by the owner
the same entry also names: Rola Bartłomiej2 persons on 2 hearths
the surname in two forms: here the adjectival genitive singular „Rolego”, in T90, entry 4, the nominal genitive plural „Rolów” — the same two persons (Stanisław and Bartłomiej). I take the nominative to be „Rola”; the standard form is to be resolved by the owner
the card gives no forename; above the surname a small addition in brackets, read as „(y z.)” [reading uncertain]
the same entry also names: Izdebski Jakób2 persons on 2 hearths
the same entry also names: Izdebski Antoni2 persons on 2 hearths
the same entry also names: Jurkowski Waw[rzyniec]2 persons on 2 hearths
the forename by the abbreviation „Lud.” — I do not expand it; „Ludwik” is nearest, but the card does not decide it
the same entry also names: Jurkowski Lud.2 persons on 2 hearths
the same entry also names: Kurowski Mikołaj †2 persons on 2 hearths
the card numbers this entry „3)” a second time (after the preceding „3)”) — I record it as „3 [bis]”. I refer „Sukcess.” to Mikołaj alone, because it stands directly beside his forename; it cannot be ruled out that it covers both
the same entry also names: Kurowski Jakób2 persons on 2 hearths
the card numbers this entry „3)” a second time (after the preceding „3)”) — I record it as „3 [bis]”. I refer „Sukcess.” to Mikołaj alone, because it stands directly beside his forename; it cannot be ruled out that it covers both
the same entry also names: Jurkowski Stanisław2 persons on 2 hearths
the same entry also names: Jurkowski Andrzej2 persons on 2 hearths
the same entry also names: Olszewski Jacek, Olszewski Kazimierz †3 persons on 3 hearths
the same entry also names: Olszewski Andrzej, Olszewski Kazimierz †3 persons on 3 hearths
the same entry also names: Olszewski Andrzej, Olszewski Jacek3 persons on 3 hearths
1789 T89Hearth tax register 1789
T89 gives the forename Maciej, T90, entry 1, at the same (the richest) holding — Michał; I do not merge them. The surname in T89 is written „Chromieńskiego” from the outset, which confirms the „e” correction made on card 3)
the same entry also names: Jurkowski Jadwiga, Jurkowski Jan †, Jurkowski Józef, Jurkowski Jędrzej5 persons on 5 hearths
Jadwiga — a woman; the surname stands once, in the masculine plural („Jurkowskich”), so I enter it as it stands. „sukces.” I refer to Jan alone, because it stands directly beside his forename (just as in T90, entry 6); it cannot be ruled out that it covers Józef and Jędrzej as well — three dead then instead of one. Five persons, five manor houses — it agrees
the same entry also names: Jurkowski Anton[i], Jurkowski Jan †, Jurkowski Józef, Jurkowski Jędrzej5 persons on 5 hearths
Jadwiga — a woman; the surname stands once, in the masculine plural („Jurkowskich”), so I enter it as it stands. „sukces.” I refer to Jan alone, because it stands directly beside his forename (just as in T90, entry 6); it cannot be ruled out that it covers Józef and Jędrzej as well — three dead then instead of one. Five persons, five manor houses — it agrees
the same entry also names: Jurkowski Jadwiga, Jurkowski Anton[i], Jurkowski Józef, Jurkowski Jędrzej5 persons on 5 hearths
Jadwiga — a woman; the surname stands once, in the masculine plural („Jurkowskich”), so I enter it as it stands. „sukces.” I refer to Jan alone, because it stands directly beside his forename (just as in T90, entry 6); it cannot be ruled out that it covers Józef and Jędrzej as well — three dead then instead of one. Five persons, five manor houses — it agrees
the same entry also names: Jurkowski Jadwiga, Jurkowski Anton[i], Jurkowski Jan †, Jurkowski Józef5 persons on 5 hearths
Jadwiga — a woman; the surname stands once, in the masculine plural („Jurkowskich”), so I enter it as it stands. „sukces.” I refer to Jan alone, because it stands directly beside his forename (just as in T90, entry 6); it cannot be ruled out that it covers Józef and Jędrzej as well — three dead then instead of one. Five persons, five manor houses — it agrees
the same entry also names: Jurkowski Jadwiga, Jurkowski Anton[i], Jurkowski Jan †, Jurkowski Jędrzej5 persons on 5 hearths
Jadwiga — a woman; the surname stands once, in the masculine plural („Jurkowskich”), so I enter it as it stands. „sukces.” I refer to Jan alone, because it stands directly beside his forename (just as in T90, entry 6); it cannot be ruled out that it covers Józef and Jędrzej as well — three dead then instead of one. Five persons, five manor houses — it agrees
the surname on this card looks like „Kurcdewicza” (after „Kurc” a clear tall loop), but the same Fabian stands on card 7) in the T₀89 list as the sworn possessor of the holding of Antoni Kurowski, and there, in another hand, he is clearly „Kurczewicz” — I accept that form, the source wording remaining in the the text of the extract field (as with the decision „Korak → Kozak”). The card sets the surname before the forename
the same entry also names: Rola Stanisław2 persons on 2 hearths
the genitive singular „Roli” — this is the third form of this surname in the village (T75 „Rolego”, T90 „Rolów”); „Roli” decides the nominative in favour of „Rola”
the same entry also names: Rola Bartłom[iej]2 persons on 2 hearths
the genitive singular „Roli” — this is the third form of this surname in the village (T75 „Rolego”, T90 „Rolów”); „Roli” decides the nominative in favour of „Rola”
the same person as in T75, entry 10, but there the surname is written clearly „Karnowskiego”, and here just as clearly „Karwowskiego” — both readings checked under magnification. nazwisko.json resolved this discrepancy after my first round: the family heading is „Karwowski”, and „Karnowski” figures as its variant. I leave the wording of the card untouched — the reduction to the heading is done by the index.
the surname without the „w”: „Zaleskiego” — as beside Adam in T90, entry 5; the same Antoni is, however, „Zalewski” in T75, entry 5, and in T90, entry 12. nazwisko.json resolved this discrepancy after my first round: the family heading is „Zalewski”, and „Zaleski” figures as its variant. I leave the wording of the card untouched — the reduction to the heading is done by the index.
the card writes „Kuroskiego” (without the „w”) — a slip of the pen for „Kurowskiego”; the same Jakub is in T75, entry 3 [bis], and in T90, entry 8, still in his lifetime
1789 T₀89List of possessors of holdings of 1789
the forename Maciej — in agreement with T89 (card 4), where the same holding is held by Maciej Chromieński; T90 and T94 give Michał at it. The surname here without the „e”, as in T94
in the left-hand column „Zaleski”, and in the right-hand one, at entry 16, the same Adam as „Adam Zalewski” — both forms on one card, in one hand. nazwisko.json resolved this discrepancy after my first round: the family heading is „Zalewski”, and „Zaleski” figures as its variant. I leave the wording of the card untouched — the reduction to the heading is done by the index.
„ssrów” = sukcesorów, of the successors
the forename by the abbreviation „Dom.” — I do not expand it; „Dominik” is nearest, but the shape of the capital letter admits „Tom[asz]” as well [reading uncertain]
the same entry also names: Zalewski Adam2 persons on a holding without hearths
the line „zaprzys. Adam Zalewski.” is indented and without a repetition mark — it is an addition to this entry, not a separate holding. The surname of the man who took the oath is written here with a „w” („Zalewski”), while in the left-hand column, entry 14, the same Adam is „Zaleski”. Jan Jurkowski is still alive in T89, entry 11 (card 4), where „sukces.” likewise stands beside him
the same entry also names: Jurkowski Jan †2 persons on a holding without hearths
the line „zaprzys. Adam Zalewski.” is indented and without a repetition mark — it is an addition to this entry, not a separate holding. The surname of the man who took the oath is written here with a „w” („Zalewski”), while in the left-hand column, entry 14, the same Adam is „Zaleski”. Jan Jurkowski is still alive in T89, entry 11 (card 4), where „sukces.” likewise stands beside him
„zaprzys.” — he took the oath for this holding
Wojciech Olszewski does not appear in any of the four registers of this village
a woman — the surname in the feminine form („Jurkowskiej”), I enter it as it stands. Barbara is in none of the four registers; she appears only in T₀89
the same entry also names: Kurowski Antoni2 persons on a holding without hearths
the entry is underlined across the whole width of the card. THE SURNAME RESOLVES THE DOUBT FROM T89: the same Fabian stands on card 4) in the form read there as „Kurcdewicza”; here, in another hand, he is clearly „Kurczewicz” — I accept that form in both places, the source wording remaining in the the text of the extract field (as with „Korak → Kozak”)
„zaprzys.” — he took the oath for this holding; „poses.” = posesor, a possessor
the same entry also names: Kurczewicz Fabian2 persons on a holding without hearths
the entry is underlined across the whole width of the card. THE SURNAME RESOLVES THE DOUBT FROM T89: the same Fabian stands on card 4) in the form read there as „Kurcdewicza”; here, in another hand, he is clearly „Kurczewicz” — I accept that form in both places, the source wording remaining in the the text of the extract field (as with „Korak → Kozak”)
the forename and the surname are repeated in the next entry — two different Andrzej Olszewskis hold two holdings; likewise T75, entry 6, names three Olszewskis
a second record of the same forename and surname — see the note at entry 3
a woman — the surname in the feminine form („Jurkowskiej”), I enter it as it stands. The same Jadwiga stands in T89, entry 11 (card 4), there in a collective entry, and so with the surname in the masculine plural
the surname again „Karwowski”, as in T89 and T94; only T75, entry 10, gives „Karnowski”
1790 T90Hearth tax register 1790
above the surname an „e” is written in — a correction to „Chromieńskiego”; the standard form according to nazwisko.json: Chromiński
the forename „Jakóba” struck out with a horizontal stroke, but nothing was written in its place — I leave the reading of the card [reading uncertain]
the forename „Bartłomieja” struck out, „Franciszka” written above it; I accept the correction. „Franciszka” is the genitive of the masculine „Franciszek” (a woman would have „Franciszki”) — this is a man
the same entry also names: Rola Stanisław2 persons on 2 hearths
the card has the genitive plural „Rolów”; I take the nominative to be „Rola”
the same entry also names: Rola Bartłomiej2 persons on 2 hearths
the card has the genitive plural „Rolów”; I take the nominative to be „Rola”
the surname written without the „w”: „Zaleskiego”, the letters „e” and „s” thickly corrected [reading uncertain]; on the same cards „Zalewski” appears separately (T75, entry 5, T90, entry 12). nazwisko.json resolved this discrepancy after my first round: the family heading is „Zalewski”, and „Zaleski” figures as its variant. I leave the wording of the card untouched — the reduction to the heading is done by the index.
the same entry also names: Jurkowski Antoni, Jurkowski Wawrzyniec †, Jurkowski Józef4 persons on 4 hearths
the card writes „Atoniego” (without the „n”) — a slip of the pen for „Antoniego”
the same entry also names: Jurkowski Wawrzyniec †, Jurkowski Andrzej, Jurkowski Józef4 persons on 4 hearths
the card writes „Atoniego” (without the „n”) — a slip of the pen for „Antoniego”
the same entry also names: Jurkowski Antoni, Jurkowski Wawrzyniec †, Jurkowski Andrzej4 persons on 4 hearths
the card writes „Atoniego” (without the „n”) — a slip of the pen for „Antoniego”
the same entry also names: Jurkowski Antoni, Jurkowski Andrzej, Jurkowski Józef4 persons on 4 hearths
the card writes „Atoniego” (without the „n”) — a slip of the pen for „Antoniego”
the same entry also names: Kurowski Józef2 persons on 2 hearths
the same entry also names: Kurowski Jakób2 persons on 2 hearths
the same entry also names: Zalewski Franciszka2 persons on 1 hearth
„Franciszki” is the feminine genitive — a woman; the surname stands once, in the masculine plural („Zalewskich”), so I enter it as it stands. Two persons on one hearth — so the card gives it
the same entry also names: Zalewski Antoni2 persons on 1 hearth
„Franciszki” is the feminine genitive — a woman; the surname stands once, in the masculine plural („Zalewskich”), so I enter it as it stands. Two persons on one hearth — so the card gives it
1794 T94Hearth tax register 1794
here the surname is written without the „e” („Chrominskiego”), unlike in T89 and in the corrected wording of T90
the same entry also names: Kurowski Józef2 persons on 2 hearths
the same entry also names: Kurowski Jakób2 persons on 2 hearths
the same entry also names: Rola Stanisław2 persons on 2 hearths
the same entry also names: Rola Bartłomiej2 persons on 2 hearths
the same entry also names: Zaleski Antoni, Zaleski Franciszek3 persons on 2 hearths
three persons, two hearths: the pair „Antoniego i Franciszka” answers to entry 12 of the register T90 („cz. Antoniego i Franciszki Zalewskich … dym 1”), where two people sit on one hearth; Adam holds the second. NOTE ON THE GENDER — this remains open: T94 writes here the masculine genitive „Franciszka” (= Franciszek), and T90 the feminine genitive „Franciszki” (= Franciszka, a woman); both readings checked under magnification. I do not merge them; to be resolved by the owner. The spelling of the surname itself („Zaleskich” against „Zalewskich”) has already been resolved by nazwisko.json in favour of the heading „Zalewski”.
the same entry also names: Zaleski Adam, Zaleski Franciszek3 persons on 2 hearths
three persons, two hearths: the pair „Antoniego i Franciszka” answers to entry 12 of the register T90 („cz. Antoniego i Franciszki Zalewskich … dym 1”), where two people sit on one hearth; Adam holds the second. NOTE ON THE GENDER — this remains open: T94 writes here the masculine genitive „Franciszka” (= Franciszek), and T90 the feminine genitive „Franciszki” (= Franciszka, a woman); both readings checked under magnification. I do not merge them; to be resolved by the owner. The spelling of the surname itself („Zaleskich” against „Zalewskich”) has already been resolved by nazwisko.json in favour of the heading „Zalewski”.
the same entry also names: Zaleski Adam, Zaleski Antoni3 persons on 2 hearths
three persons, two hearths: the pair „Antoniego i Franciszka” answers to entry 12 of the register T90 („cz. Antoniego i Franciszki Zalewskich … dym 1”), where two people sit on one hearth; Adam holds the second. NOTE ON THE GENDER — this remains open: T94 writes here the masculine genitive „Franciszka” (= Franciszek), and T90 the feminine genitive „Franciszki” (= Franciszka, a woman); both readings checked under magnification. I do not merge them; to be resolved by the owner. The spelling of the surname itself („Zaleskich” against „Zalewskich”) has already been resolved by nazwisko.json in favour of the heading „Zalewski”.
here, in T89 and in T₀89 the surname is written „Karwowski”, and in T75, entry 10, „Karnowski”. nazwisko.json resolved this discrepancy after my first round: the family heading is „Karwowski”, and „Karnowski” figures as its variant. I leave the wording of the card untouched — the reduction to the heading is done by the index.
the same entry also names: Jurkowski Antoni, Jurkowski Wawrzyniec †, Jurkowski Józef4 persons on 4 hearths
the same entry as T90, entry 6, with the same four forenames. THE SCOPE OF THE WORD „sukcesorów”: I assume that it covers Wawrzyniec alone, because it stands directly beside his forename — that is how this abbreviation reads in the other villages of the collection as well (cf. Krasusy Łęcznowola T90: „cz. sukces. Wojciecha, Andrzeja Przezdomy, Józefa Przezdomy…”, where living persons follow the abbreviation, and beside every deceased person the abbreviation is repeated). It is impossible, however, to rule out the reading „sukcesorów Wawrzyńca, Andrzeja i Józefa” — three dead then instead of one. To be resolved by the owner; the same doubt concerns T90, entry 6, and T89, entry 11
the same entry also names: Jurkowski Wawrzyniec †, Jurkowski Andrzej, Jurkowski Józef4 persons on 4 hearths
the same entry as T90, entry 6, with the same four forenames. THE SCOPE OF THE WORD „sukcesorów”: I assume that it covers Wawrzyniec alone, because it stands directly beside his forename — that is how this abbreviation reads in the other villages of the collection as well (cf. Krasusy Łęcznowola T90: „cz. sukces. Wojciecha, Andrzeja Przezdomy, Józefa Przezdomy…”, where living persons follow the abbreviation, and beside every deceased person the abbreviation is repeated). It is impossible, however, to rule out the reading „sukcesorów Wawrzyńca, Andrzeja i Józefa” — three dead then instead of one. To be resolved by the owner; the same doubt concerns T90, entry 6, and T89, entry 11
the same entry also names: Jurkowski Antoni, Jurkowski Wawrzyniec †, Jurkowski Andrzej4 persons on 4 hearths
the same entry as T90, entry 6, with the same four forenames. THE SCOPE OF THE WORD „sukcesorów”: I assume that it covers Wawrzyniec alone, because it stands directly beside his forename — that is how this abbreviation reads in the other villages of the collection as well (cf. Krasusy Łęcznowola T90: „cz. sukces. Wojciecha, Andrzeja Przezdomy, Józefa Przezdomy…”, where living persons follow the abbreviation, and beside every deceased person the abbreviation is repeated). It is impossible, however, to rule out the reading „sukcesorów Wawrzyńca, Andrzeja i Józefa” — three dead then instead of one. To be resolved by the owner; the same doubt concerns T90, entry 6, and T89, entry 11
the same entry also names: Jurkowski Antoni, Jurkowski Andrzej, Jurkowski Józef4 persons on 4 hearths
the same entry as T90, entry 6, with the same four forenames. THE SCOPE OF THE WORD „sukcesorów”: I assume that it covers Wawrzyniec alone, because it stands directly beside his forename — that is how this abbreviation reads in the other villages of the collection as well (cf. Krasusy Łęcznowola T90: „cz. sukces. Wojciecha, Andrzeja Przezdomy, Józefa Przezdomy…”, where living persons follow the abbreviation, and beside every deceased person the abbreviation is repeated). It is impossible, however, to rule out the reading „sukcesorów Wawrzyńca, Andrzeja i Józefa” — three dead then instead of one. To be resolved by the owner; the same doubt concerns T90, entry 6, and T89, entry 11
This locality in the full edition of the hearth-tax registers — together with a search across all persons, a modern map, Perthées’s engraving of 1786 and a statistical summary.
