Dear reader, remember that this is an AI study, that it may contain errors; treat it as indicative and verify it for yourself.
Offices: Dłuski Sebastian (starost of Zwoleń (starosta zwoliński)
More than five hearths in one hand: Dłuski Sebastian (9)
spellings on the cards: Woytostwo Łukowskie, woytowstwo Łukowskie, wóytostwo łukowskie, Wójtostwo
district of łukowski · parish of Łuków · cards 1
a wójtostwo — royal estates belonging to the starosty of Łuków, in the possession of Sebastian Dłuski; it lies right beside the town of Łuków on the north-east [Top.]. The hearth tax: 9 hearths in T90 („9 dymów miejskich”, town hearths) and 9 hearths in T89 (8 cottages with 1 householder + a cottage with a garden). The name is neither in Perthées nor on the map of Heldensfeld („Perth – niema –”, „Held – niema –”). The population of 1789 according to the St.89 extract: 58 persons (27 men, 31 women).
Population 1787
—
of whom Christians
—
of whom Jews
—
Year
Source
Entries
Hearths
T89
Hearth tax register 1789
1
9
T90
Hearth tax register 1790
1
9
Without an extract for 1775 and 1794 — no card of this village carries that tariff. It is a missing extract in the card index, not a gap in the numbering of the cards.
Caveats on the years' registers (1)
What the compiler noted beside the entry itself, and what the table above does not show:
T90 — The whole T90 extract for this unit fits into one entry: the card does not break the wójtostwo down into holdings and names no part-holding possessors.
The card-index entries
Every extract for this locality in the wording of the cards, year by year. One block is one occurrence: this person, in this year. At a collective item the same card text stands beside every person named — because the card names them together and they must not be separated. The hearths given at a collective item are an equal division among those named, not a reading.
1790 T90Hearth tax register 1790
DłuskiSebastianstarost of Łuków (starosta łukowski)starost of Zwoleń (starosta zwoliński)
T909 hearthspossessorpossessorT90 – Woytostwo Łukowskie – dobra król.; w poses. Dłuskiego starosty zwolińskiego – 9 dymów miejskich, w tem(?) 1 przybył po r. 1789. –
The number of hearths („9”) is underlined on the card. This line gives no forename for the possessor — it is given only by St.89 („Sebastyana Dłuskiego”). The office: the card writes here „starosty zwolińskiego”, whereas St.89 and both cards of Cieszkowizna call the same person starost of Łuków — I do not reconcile the discrepancy. The addition „w tem(?) 1 przybył po r. 1789” — the abbreviation „tem” written above the line, the question mark in brackets set there by the compiler, the word „przybył” broken between the lines and running up to the right-hand edge of the frame [reading uncertain]. The description „dymów miejskich”, town hearths, the card applies to the wójtostwo (the wójt's holding), although the wójtostwo itself lies outside the town.A DISCREPANCY IN THE SOURCE, checked under magnification on 19 IX 2026 and NOT smoothed over: the card writes plainly „w poses. Dłuskiego starosty zwolińskiego” [starost of Zwoleń (starosta zwoliński)]. All the remaining extracts for the same person — T89, T90, T94 and T₀89 of Cieszkowizna, T89, T90 and O83 of the town of Łuków — call him starost of ŁUKÓW. The card index does not explain this difference; it may be a slip of the author of the transcript, it may be a second starosty. To be resolved outside the card index.
This locality in the full edition of the hearth-tax registers — together with a search across all persons, a modern map, Perthées’s engraving of 1786 and a statistical summary.
