The surname again „Głuchowskiego”, the same as in T90 on card 2.
Home › Castle court records / Old sources › The hearth-tax registers 1775–1794 › Surnames › Głuchowski
Hearth Tax Registers of the Łuków Land 1775–1794
Głuchowski
separate records 34 · places 15 · registers 1775, 1789, 1790, 1794
Dear reader, remember that this is an AI study, that it may contain errors; treat it as indicative and verify it for yourself.
„Separate entries for persons” means: separate entries of a given name with a surname and a byname, not persons proved to have existed. The same man recorded in four registers is one entry, but two namesakes from the same village are sometimes impossible to tell apart, and over twenty years a parcel could pass to a son of the same name. The hearths given at a collective entry are an equal division among those named — a calculation, not a reading.
| Year | Source | Entries | Persons | Hearths |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1775 | Hearth tax register 1775 | 14 | 14 | 21,0 |
| 1789 | Hearth tax register 1789 | 15 | 15 | 14,0 |
| 1789 | List of possessors of holdings of 1789 | 16 | 15 | — |
| 1790 | Hearth tax register 1790 | 14 | 14 | 13,0 |
| 1794 | Hearth tax register 1794 | 14 | 14 | 13,0 |
The year 1789 stands twice in the table, and rightly so: these are two different sources. The register gives the hearths, the list of parcel-holders does not — which is why the list carries a dash and not a zero, and the hearths of 1789 are not counted twice.
Where the surname occurs
The localities in which the card file records this surname, with the number of entries and of the hearths falling to it in each village.
- Borki-SołdyZbuczynrecords 4 · hearths 3,0
- ChromnaZbuczynrecords 6 · hearths 7,0
- GrochówkaTrzebieszówrecords 5 · hearths 4,0
- KarwówTrzebieszówrecords 2
- MikłusyTrzebieszówrecords 3 · hearths 3,0
- ZaolszynieTrzebieszówrecords 8 · hearths 4,0
- MaciejowiceTrzebieszówrecords 13 · hearths 11,0
- Pióry-PytkiZbuczynrecords 3 · hearths 3,0
- Pióry WielkieZbuczynrecords 7 · hearths 10,0
- PogonówZbuczynrecords 1 · hearths 1,0
- Radzików WielkiZbuczynrecords 3 · hearths 2,0
- RzązewZbuczynrecords 1 · hearths 1,0
- Szaniawy-MatysyTrzebieszówrecords 8 · hearths 4,0
- WielgórzZbuczynrecords 5 · hearths 4,0
- WylanyTrzebieszówrecords 4 · hearths 4,0
The card-index entries
All the extracts for this surname in the wording of the cards. One block is one occurrence: this person, in this register. In a collective entry the same text of the card stands beside every person named — because the card names them together, and they must not be separated.
Borki-SołdyZbuczyn parish
the same entry also names: Borkowski Bartłomiej †, Ohniński Jakub †3 persons on a holding without hearths
The entry under the brace „nie wysiewają 10 korcy”; the last on the card. „sukcesorów” is written in a contracted abbreviation: an „s” with a horizontal stroke over the following letters and the ending „rów” — the same as the spelled-out „sukcesorów” in T94 on card 4. The genitive takes in both persons joined by the conjunction „i”, so I read that both are dead — Bartłomiej Borkowski and Jakub Ohniński; if „sukcesorów” referred only to the first, Jakub would be a living co-possessor [to be resolved by the owner]. I do not expand the abbreviation „zaprzys.”.
added in the line below as „zaprzys. Wojciech Głuchowski” — in the nominative, not in the genitive like the rest of the list; it was he who took the oath for this holding, not its possessor
The designation of the class of the hearth the card repeats with marks of quotation after entry A („dym wiejski 2giej klasy”). The surname: the capital letter has at the top on the left a characteristic flourish, the same as the „G” of „Grzegorza” on the same card, and not the little loop of the „S” of „Sebastiana” in the line above; the second letter is a tall stem with a thick crossbar at the top, that is „ł”. The reading: „Głuchowskiego”.
here the surname without a „w”: „Głuchoskiego”; on cards 2, 3 and 5 of this village the same man is recorded as „Głuchowski”
ChromnaZbuczyn parish
the card gives no forename; the record is in the plural („Głuchowskich”)
T89 (card 3) calls the same holding „Felicjana Głuchowskiego”
GrochówkaTrzebieszów parish
The line has no opening „cz.”; the number of hearths is rendered by a repetition mark („), that is „dym”.
The only line of this list in the nominative and not in the genitive — so it stands on the card.
KarwówTrzebieszów parish
the same entry also names: Celiński Borgiasz, Stypiński Józef †3 persons on a holding without hearths
the same entry also names: Stypiński Józef †2 persons on a holding without hearths
MikłusyTrzebieszów parish
ZaolszynieTrzebieszów parish
beside the surname a pencil mark „(x.)” — the same stands in entry 31 beside „Borkowskich”; the sense of the reference is unresolved
covered by a marginal brace with the addition „nie wysiewają 10 korcy”
covered by a marginal brace with the addition „nie wysiewają 10 korcy”
covered by a marginal brace with the addition „nie wysiewają 10 korcy”
MaciejowiceTrzebieszów parish
the same entry also names: Głuchowski Piotr2 persons on 2 hearths
the surname is written with a different capital letter than „Grochowskich” in entry 3 — I read „Głuchowskich”
the same entry also names: Głuchowski Maciej2 persons on 2 hearths
the surname is written with a different capital letter than „Grochowskich” in entry 3 — I read „Głuchowskich”
the same entry also names: Głuchowski Tomasz, Głuchowski Maciej3 persons on 3 hearths
the same entry also names: Głuchowski Jan, Głuchowski Tomasz3 persons on 3 hearths
the same entry also names: Głuchowski Jan, Głuchowski Maciej3 persons on 3 hearths
the same entry also names: Głuchowski Maciej, Głuchowski Tomasz3 persons on 3 hearths
the same entry also names: Głuchowski Jan, Głuchowski Tomasz3 persons on 3 hearths
the same entry also names: Głuchowski Maciej, Głuchowski Jan3 persons on 3 hearths
the same entry also names: Głuchowski Maciej, Głuchowski Tomasz3 persons on 3 hearths
the same entry also names: Głuchowski Jan, Głuchowski Tomasz3 persons on 3 hearths
the same entry also names: Głuchowski Maciej, Głuchowski Jan3 persons on 3 hearths
Pióry-PytkiZbuczyn parish
In T89 there is neither Marcin Wielgórski nor Mikołaj Słowik, who stand in T90 and T94 — nevertheless both registers give the same total of 5 hearths (here 4+1, there 2+1+1+1).
Pióry WielkieZbuczyn parish
the card gives the surname before the forename
PogonówZbuczyn parish
I read the surname as „Głuchowskiego”: the initial has the same little loop as the „G” in „Grodzickiego” (entry 6) and „Grochowskiego” (entry 16), and not the shape of the single-stroke „S” of „Soszyńskiego” (entry 2) and „Stanisława” (entry 14). The first reading of these cards gave „Słuchowskiego” [there: reading uncertain]; on collating both readings the lection „Głuchowski” was adopted.
Radzików WielkiZbuczyn parish
A DISCREPANCY BETWEEN THE SIGLA, I do not smooth it away: T89 writes here „Głuchowskiego” (a distinct G + ł with a slanting stroke), while T90 F) on card 3) has in the same village „Stuchowskiej Elżbiety wdowy” (S + t with a crossbar, identical with the „Stanisława” of the same hand). Both forms checked under a large magnification. It may be the widow of this very Jan, but the card does not say so and I do not add it. The head-form from nazwiska.json: Głuchowski.
the right-hand column, BELOW the stroke — the entry is taken in by the great brace with the vertical addition „nie wysiewają 10 korcy”; in the wording of the entry itself there is no trace of it
a woman; the surname in the feminine form, just as on the card. The same person as „cz. Elżbiety Głuchowskiej wdowy” in T94 (card 7); here the card does not add the word „wdowy”
RzązewZbuczyn parish
here the wording distinctly „Głuchowskiego” (a capital „G” with „ł”); T90 on card 2) and T94 on card 7) have in the same place „Stuchowskiego”. A discrepancy of the wording within the card index
Szaniawy-MatysyTrzebieszów parish
the same entry also names: Głuchowski Wojciech2 persons on 1 hearth
Two persons on one hearth — just as in T90 on card (entry 4).
the same entry also names: Głuchowski Maciej2 persons on 1 hearth
Two persons on one hearth — just as in T90 on card (entry 4).
the same entry also names: Głuchowski Wojciech2 persons on 1 hearth
Two persons on one hearth. The surname corrected: „Franciszka” struck out, „Głuchowskich” added above the line. Beside the number of hearths „po” is struck out, leaving „1 dym.” alone — and only with one hearth does the card's total (36) come out: 22 + 5 + 2 + 1 + 3 + 1 + 2 = 36.
the same entry also names: Głuchowski Maciej2 persons on 1 hearth
Two persons on one hearth. The surname corrected: „Franciszka” struck out, „Głuchowskich” added above the line. Beside the number of hearths „po” is struck out, leaving „1 dym.” alone — and only with one hearth does the card's total (36) come out: 22 + 5 + 2 + 1 + 3 + 1 + 2 = 36.
the same entry also names: Głuchowski Wojciech2 persons on 1 hearth
Two persons on one hearth, as in T89 and T90.
the same entry also names: Głuchowski Maciej2 persons on 1 hearth
Two persons on one hearth, as in T89 and T90.
WielgórzZbuczyn parish
The initial of the surname is an ornate „G”, easy to take for an „S” („Słuchowski”) — decided by comparison with T₀89 on card 6), where the same person stands as „cz. Szymona Głuchowskiego” in a clear hand and the „G” is beyond dispute, and with T89 on card 4) („cz. Szymona Głuchowskiego (dwór) = 1 d.”). The second letter is an „ł” written like a „t” (this hand does not differentiate them — cf. „Bartłomieja” on card 2).
The surname on cards 4 and 5 looks at first glance like „Stuchowskiego”: the capital letter is small and rounded, and the „ł” with its crossbar that follows it is easy to take for a „t”. A comparison of the letters decides it: this writer's capital „S” (for example in „Szymona” in the same line) has a quite different, large flourish, and on card 6 the same person is written clearly „Głuchowskiego”, with a full „G”. T75 on card 1 reads the same way („7) cz. Szymona Głuchowskiego – dym 1”). I therefore read „Głuchowski” everywhere; the form is in nazwiska.json.
Here the surname is written with a clear, large „G” — it is precisely this writing that decides the reading „Głuchowski” on cards 4 and 5. OUTSIDE THE BRACE: the horizontal stroke of the brace runs DIRECTLY BELOW this line, so this entry does not receive the annotation „nie wysiewa 10 korcy”.
The forename on this card is written „Szymana” (and not „Szymona”, as in T75 entry 7 on card 1) and in T89 on card 4) — the nominative „Szyman”; I do not smooth the discrepancy over. [reading uncertain] as to the vowel in the forename. The surname: the initial is an ornate „G”, easy to take for an „S”; decided by comparison with T₀89 on card 6), where „cz. Szymona Głuchowskiego” is written clearly. The second letter is an „ł” written like a „t” — this hand writes „t” and „ł” identically (cf. „Bartłomieja” in entry F on the same card).
The surname is written with the same „Gł” ligature, confused with „St”, as in T89 entry 10 — see the note there.
WylanyTrzebieszów parish
the forename by the abbreviation „Mi.” — I do not expand it. In T89, T90 and T94 the only Głuchowski in Wylany is Mikołaj, so the abbreviation most likely means Mi[kołaj], but Michał is also possible — the expansion is left to the decision of the owner
This surname in full edition of the hearth-tax registers — together with the search across all persons, the comparison of figures through the registers, the modern map and the Perthées engraving of 1786.
