The card writes the surname with a double „s” („Krassowskiego”) — and so I write it too; `nazwiska.json` reduces this form to the headword Krasowski.
Home › Castle court records / Old sources › The hearth-tax registers 1775–1794 › Surnames › Krasowski
Hearth Tax Registers of the Łuków Land 1775–1794
Krasowski
separate records 8 · places 3 · registers 1775, 1789, 1790, 1794
Dear reader, remember that this is an AI study, that it may contain errors; treat it as indicative and verify it for yourself.
„Separate entries for persons” means: separate entries of a given name with a surname and a byname, not persons proved to have existed. The same man recorded in four registers is one entry, but two namesakes from the same village are sometimes impossible to tell apart, and over twenty years a parcel could pass to a son of the same name. The hearths given at a collective entry are an equal division among those named — a calculation, not a reading.
| Year | Source | Entries | Persons | Hearths |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1775 | Hearth tax register 1775 | 2 | 2 | 6,0 |
| 1789 | Hearth tax register 1789 | 3 | 3 | 7,0 |
| 1789 | List of possessors of holdings of 1789 | 6 | 5 | — |
| 1790 | Hearth tax register 1790 | 1 | 1 | 5,0 |
| 1794 | Hearth tax register 1794 | 1 | 1 | 5,0 |
The year 1789 stands twice in the table, and rightly so: these are two different sources. The register gives the hearths, the list of parcel-holders does not — which is why the list carries a dash and not a zero, and the hearths of 1789 are not counted twice.
Where the surname occurs
The localities in which the card file records this surname, with the number of entries and of the hearths falling to it in each village.
- GołaszynŁukówrecords 7 · hearths 3,0
- Izdebki-KosnyZbuczynrecords 1
- LipinyZbuczynrecords 5 · hearths 20,0
establishments recorded with this surname brewery Lipiny inn Lipiny propination (the right to sell drink) Lipiny
The card-index entries
All the extracts for this surname in the wording of the cards. One block is one occurrence: this person, in this register. In a collective entry the same text of the card stands beside every person named — because the card names them together, and they must not be separated.
Gołaszynparafia Łuków
the same entry also names: Krassowski Józef2 persons on 2 hearths
the surname corrected on the card — the middle of the word written over in thicker ink; I read the final writing as „Krassowskich” [reading uncertain]. T90 (card 4), entry 12) has in this place „Jana i Antoniego Krasuskich”, T₀89 (cards 8)–650) names in Gołaszyn Jakub, Jan and Antoni Krassowski — both families are attested in the village, and so I do not force the reading.
the same entry also names: Krassowski Antoni2 persons on 2 hearths
the surname corrected on the card — the middle of the word written over in thicker ink; I read the final writing as „Krassowskich” [reading uncertain]. T90 (card 4), entry 12) has in this place „Jana i Antoniego Krasuskich”, T₀89 (cards 8)–650) names in Gołaszyn Jakub, Jan and Antoni Krassowski — both families are attested in the village, and so I do not force the reading.
the same entry also names: Gołaski Franciszek †2 persons on a holding without hearths
The line runs to the very edge of the card and breaks off at „Krassowskie…” — the last letters are cut away at the card's margin [reading uncertain as to the ending]. THE ONLY ENTRY ON CARD 649 WITHOUT THE ADDITION „nie wys. 10 kor.” — entries 21, 23 and 24 have such an addition, this one does not (most probably because there was no room left), and so I do NOT place the annotation „nie wysiewa 10 korcy” here.
the same entry also names: Gołaski Antoni †2 persons on a holding without hearths
Izdebki-KosnyZbuczyn parish
the surname on the card with two „s”: „Krassowskiego”
LipinyZbuczyn parish
The surname on this card is written „Krasowskiego” (with a single -s-, with -ow-); in ALL the remaining extracts of this village „Krassowskiego” stands, with two -s- (in T90 on the same card the letter is reworked, but on card 4) the writing is entirely legible). The form with a single -s- is therefore isolated in this village and stands only here; I do not harmonise it. Not to be confused with the Krasuskis of the parish of Trzebieszów — here „-ow-” is clear. The figure „5” underlined.
The surname on this card is written „Krassowskiego” (with two -s-), just as in T90 on card 1); in T75 on card 1) „Krasowskiego” stands, with a single -s-. The buildings: „dwór” and „browar” and „karczma”, without a numeral, I count as 1 each; 1+1+1+2 = 5, in accordance with the given „= 5 d.” („5 d.” underlined). The figure „1” in „o 1 gosp.” is written thickly, over a blotted place — most likely a correction [the reading is uncertain as to what was corrected; the formula „o 1 gosp.” itself is standard in this card index].
The line is at the same time the heading of the whole list. The surname is written „Krassowskiego” (with two -s-), as in T89 and T94. Propination (the right to make and sell drink) the card assigns at Lipiny to this one holding only — the same holding at which T89 on card 2) lists a brewery and an inn.
The surname is written here „Krassowskiego”: after „Kras” stands a second letter „s” written thickly, over a blotted place (a correction) [the reading is uncertain as to the number of „s” letters]; in the T75 of the same card „Krasowskiego” stands. The forename „Michała” — in T75, entry 1, the same holding (as to the surname) is held by „Maciej”; the card index does not explain whether this is the same person or a successor — I do not decide. In the right-hand column the words „2giej klasy” are STRUCK OUT, although the total at the foot of the list repeats that formula.
The surname is written „Krassowskiego” (with two -s-), as in T89 on card 2) and in T90 on card 1). „5 d.” underlined.
This surname in full edition of the hearth-tax registers — together with the search across all persons, the comparison of figures through the registers, the modern map and the Perthées engraving of 1786.
