the card gives no forename. The surname is written „Domaszowskiego” (with -ow-), just as in T90; in T89 (card 4), portion B) the same person is written „Domaszewskiego”.
Home › Castle court records / Old sources › The hearth-tax registers 1775–1794 › Surnames › Domaszewski
Hearth Tax Registers of the Łuków Land 1775–1794
Domaszewski
separate records 3 · places 5 · registers 1775, 1789, 1790, 1794
Dear reader, remember that this is an AI study, that it may contain errors; treat it as indicative and verify it for yourself.
„Separate entries for persons” means: separate entries of a given name with a surname and a byname, not persons proved to have existed. The same man recorded in four registers is one entry, but two namesakes from the same village are sometimes impossible to tell apart, and over twenty years a parcel could pass to a son of the same name. The hearths given at a collective entry are an equal division among those named — a calculation, not a reading.
| Year | Source | Entries | Persons | Hearths |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1775 | Hearth tax register 1775 | 1 | 1 | 49,0 |
| 1789 | Hearth tax register 1789 | 6 | 2 | 103,0 |
| 1789 | List of possessors of holdings of 1789 | 6 | 2 | — |
| 1790 | Hearth tax register 1790 | 6 | 2 | 100,0 |
| 1794 | Hearth tax register 1794 | 4 | 2 | 80,0 |
The year 1789 stands twice in the table, and rightly so: these are two different sources. The register gives the hearths, the list of parcel-holders does not — which is why the list carries a dash and not a zero, and the hearths of 1789 are not counted twice.
Where the surname occurs
The localities in which the card file records this surname, with the number of entries and of the hearths falling to it in each village.
- DomaszewnicaŁukówrecords 6 · hearths 199,0
- GozdTuchowiczrecords 8 · hearths 61,0
- KijTuchowiczrecords 2 · hearths 2,0
- NiedźwiadkaTuchowiczrecords 6 · hearths 31,0
- Wólka DomaszewskaŁukówrecords 3 · hearths 39,0
offices and dignities treasurer of Łuków (skarbnik łukowski) son of the treasurer of Łuków (skarbnikiewicz łukowski) son of the treasurer of the Łuków Land (skarbnikowicz ziemi łukowskiej) pantler and deputy starost of Łuków (stolnik i podstarosta łukowski) pantler of Łuków (stolnik łukowski) pantler of the Land and deputy castle starost of Łuków (stolnik ziemi i podstarosta grodzki łukowski) pantler of the Łuków Land and deputy castle starost of Łuków (stolnik ziemi łukowskiej i podstarosta grodzki łukowski) pantler of the Łuków Land and deputy starost of Łuków (stolnik ziemi łukowskiej i podstarosta łukowski)
establishments recorded with this surname brewery Domaszewnica Gozd Niedźwiadka Wólka Domaszewska inn Domaszewnica Gozd Niedźwiadka Wólka Domaszewska mill Domaszewnica propination (the right to sell drink) Domaszewnica Gozd Niedźwiadka Wólka Domaszewska
The card-index entries
All the extracts for this surname in the wording of the cards. One block is one occurrence: this person, in this register. In a collective entry the same text of the card stands beside every person named — because the card names them together, and they must not be separated.
Domaszewnicaparafia Łuków
The only entry which begins with „dz.” (dziedzic, the hereditary owner), and not with „cz.” — hence the annotation „dziedzic”. 1+1+1+1+39+5+3+1 = 52 d. The gardeners' cottages the card names in two groups („5 chat. ogr.” and „3 chat. ogrod.”); in the breakdown of buildings they are added together under one key = 8. The figure „2” raised before the circled „ogr.” is a mark of correction, not a number of buildings — were it counted, the total would not give the 52 hearths stated by the card.
The heading line of the extract, before the numbered entries — hence the ordinal „0”. It concerns the grange; „propinacja.” added a little higher, at the end of the line.
the surname on this card is „Domaszowskiego” (with -ow-), just as in T75; in T89 (card 4), portion B) „Domaszewskiego”. The card gives the office in shortened form („Stolnika i Podstarosty Łukows.”); T89 expands it: „stolnika ziemi łukow. i podstarosty grodz. łukow.”. The figure 49 underlined.
The surname on this card is written with -ow-: „Domaszowskiego”; in T89 of the same village stands „Domaszewskiego”. In the surname the form is standardised to Domaszewski.
A short description of the village — without figures and without a list of holdings, hence the hearths figure empty. The Roman numeral in brackets („IX”) is underlined, as on the other cards of O83. The word „różne” is added in a fainter hand and outlined [reading uncertain]. The ellipsis after „posesje” stands on the card — the compiler shortened the quotation. The word „podstarosty” is broken between the lines („pod- / starosty”). O83 names here neither an inn, nor a brewery, nor a mill, although T89 notes beside the hereditary owner 1 brewery, 1 inn and 1 mill.
Gozdparafia Tuchowicz
the same entry also names: Domaszewski Paweł2 persons on 21 hearths
„bez” before „ogr.” was added in black ink above the line, with an insertion mark — originally „3 chat. ogr.” stood alone. The figure „1” in „o 1 gosp.” was strengthened in black ink over the blue. The figure „21 d.” is underlined twice. The card writes here „skarbnikiewicza”, and T90 on the same card „skarbnikowicza” — I leave both forms as they stand.
the same entry also names: Domaszewski Franciszek2 persons on 21 hearths
„bez” before „ogr.” was added in black ink above the line, with an insertion mark — originally „3 chat. ogr.” stood alone. The figure „1” in „o 1 gosp.” was strengthened in black ink over the blue. The figure „21 d.” is underlined twice. The card writes here „skarbnikiewicza”, and T90 on the same card „skarbnikowicza” — I leave both forms as they stand.
the same entry also names: Domaszewski Paweł2 persons on a holding without hearths
A list of possessors for 1789 — without hearths, hence the hearths figure is empty. The village is not divided here into holdings: one entry for the whole village. „mał[o]letniego” — the card writes „ma” + a „ł” raised above the line + „letniego”, that is a contracted „małoletniego” [reading uncertain as to the manner of the abbreviation, the sense unambiguous]. „stolnika” the card writes with a contracted „ol” (it looks like „stłnika”); I expand it after card 1), where the same Paweł Domaszewski is „stolnikiem ziemi”. The abbreviation „w pos.” = „w posesji”, in possession; „wś.” = „wieś”, village — neither of them do I expand in the text. Propination is stated outright.
the same entry also names: Domaszewski Franciszek2 persons on a holding without hearths
A list of possessors for 1789 — without hearths, hence the hearths figure is empty. The village is not divided here into holdings: one entry for the whole village. „mał[o]letniego” — the card writes „ma” + a „ł” raised above the line + „letniego”, that is a contracted „małoletniego” [reading uncertain as to the manner of the abbreviation, the sense unambiguous]. „stolnika” the card writes with a contracted „ol” (it looks like „stłnika”); I expand it after card 1), where the same Paweł Domaszewski is „stolnikiem ziemi”. The abbreviation „w pos.” = „w posesji”, in possession; „wś.” = „wieś”, village — neither of them do I expand in the text. Propination is stated outright.
the same entry also names: Domaszewski Paweł2 persons on 20 hearths
The figure 20 concerns the grange of Gozd itself („dymów wiejskich 2giej klasy”), not the whole estate — the appurtenances (Niedźwiadka, Kij) the card names in brackets, but it gives no separate figures for them in this extract. The formula „dymów wiejskich 2giej klasy” runs just as it does at Annonin (card) and Lipniaki (card 1). Franciszek Domaszewski is here the hereditary owner and not the possessor; Paweł Domaszewski appears as his guardian, not as the owner. The abbreviated forename „Franc.” I expand on the basis of the T89 of the same card, where the full „Franciszka” stands.
the same entry also names: Domaszewski Franc[iszek]2 persons on 20 hearths
The figure 20 concerns the grange of Gozd itself („dymów wiejskich 2giej klasy”), not the whole estate — the appurtenances (Niedźwiadka, Kij) the card names in brackets, but it gives no separate figures for them in this extract. The formula „dymów wiejskich 2giej klasy” runs just as it does at Annonin (card) and Lipniaki (card 1). Franciszek Domaszewski is here the hereditary owner and not the possessor; Paweł Domaszewski appears as his guardian, not as the owner. The abbreviated forename „Franc.” I expand on the basis of the T89 of the same card, where the full „Franciszka” stands.
The figure 20 concerns the grange of Gozd itself, not the whole estate — the appurtenances (Niedźwiadka, Kij) the card names by name, but it gives no separate figures for them. The result agrees to the single hearth with T90 on card 1) (the grange of Gozd — 20 dymów wiejskich 2giej klasy). The figure 20 is not underlined on the card. In this extract the card gives beside Franciszek Domaszewski neither an office nor any mention of a guardian.
A short characterisation of the village; it gives neither figures nor a list of holdings, hence the hearths figure is empty. The siglum is written „O83(IX)” — the Roman numeral in brackets is underlined. IMPORTANT: this is the only place in the two Gozd cards where the forename STEFAN falls; all the remaining extracts (T89, T90, T94, T₀89) speak of Franciszek Domaszewski, „skarbnikowicz/skarbnikiewicz” of Łuków. There is no contradiction here: „skarbnikowicz” is the son of a treasurer, and so O83 records the father, the office-holder, while the registers of 1789–1794 record the son, by then a minor under the guardianship of Paweł Domaszewski. I do not merge these persons and I do not correct either of the forenames.
Kijparafia Tuchowicz
One entry for the whole grange, the numbering „1” editorial. The figure „1” is underlined on the card. The formula „dymów wiejskich 2giej klasy” runs just as it does at Gozd (card 1), 20 hearths), Annonin (card) and Lipniaki (card 1); here, however, it concerns the grange of Kij alone. The abbreviated forename „Franc.” I expand on the basis of the T94 of the same card, where the full „Franciszka” stands. The addition „(może też być Kiy?)” is the card index author's own hesitation over the reading of the name, not a second name of the place — I record it literally and add „Kiy” to the variants [reading uncertain as to the last letter: in the lines T90, MH, V48 and T94 a dot is visible over the letter that ends the name, that is a „j”, while in the „Top” line and in the addition there is no dot, that is a „y”].
One entry for the whole grange, the numbering „1” editorial. The phrase „1 dym.” is underlined on the card. In this extract the card gives beside Franciszek Domaszewski neither an office nor any mention of a guardian — unlike T90 on the same card („skarbnikowicza ziemi łukowskiej”) and unlike the Gozd card (card 1), where Paweł Domaszewski also appears as guardian. The result agrees to the single hearth with the T90 of the same card.
Niedźwiadkaparafia Tuchowicz
the same entry also names: Domaszewski Paweł2 persons on 11 hearths
NOTE: these 11 hearths DO NOT LIE IN GOZD — the card counts up here the buildings of the appurtenances, the grange of Kij and the village of Niedźwiadka, within the same T89 extract for the estate of Franciszek Domaszewski. I record the entry, because it stands on the Gozd card, but in reckoning the hearths of Gozd itself it must not be added in (Gozd = 21 d.). „bez” before „ogr.” was added in black ink, ringed round, with an insertion mark — originally „2 chat. ogr.” stood alone; the figure „1” in „o 1 gosp.” was strengthened in black ink.
the same entry also names: Domaszewski Franciszek2 persons on 11 hearths
NOTE: these 11 hearths DO NOT LIE IN GOZD — the card counts up here the buildings of the appurtenances, the grange of Kij and the village of Niedźwiadka, within the same T89 extract for the estate of Franciszek Domaszewski. I record the entry, because it stands on the Gozd card, but in reckoning the hearths of Gozd itself it must not be added in (Gozd = 21 d.). „bez” before „ogr.” was added in black ink, ringed round, with an insertion mark — originally „2 chat. ogr.” stood alone; the figure „1” in „o 1 gosp.” was strengthened in black ink.
the same entry also names: Domaszewski Paweł2 persons on a holding without hearths
A list of possessors for 1789 — without hearths, hence the hearths figure is empty. The village is not divided into holdings: one entry covers NIEDŹWIADKA AND KIJ TOGETHER („Niedzwiadka i Kiy”) — and so the Kij card (card) has no entry of its own for the year 1789, but only cross-refers: „T₀89 – zob. Niedźwiadka”. The name of Kij in this line is written with a „y” („Kiy”), in keeping with the hesitation over the reading noted on the Kij card. „mał[o]letniego” — the card writes „ma” + „ł” + „letniego”, that is a contracted „małoletniego” [reading uncertain as to the manner of the abbreviation, the sense unambiguous; the same contracted form as on the Gozd card, card 2)]. „stolnika Łukowskiego” the card writes with a capital „Ł”; I record the office with a small letter, as on the remaining cards. The abbreviation „w pos.” (= w posesji, in possession) I do not expand in the text. Propination is stated outright. The wording is a twin of the T₀89 on the Gozd card (card 2), but it is not a copy of it: there the talk is of the „wsi” (Gozd), here of Niedźwiadka and Kij together.
the same entry also names: Domaszewski Franciszek2 persons on a holding without hearths
A list of possessors for 1789 — without hearths, hence the hearths figure is empty. The village is not divided into holdings: one entry covers NIEDŹWIADKA AND KIJ TOGETHER („Niedzwiadka i Kiy”) — and so the Kij card (card) has no entry of its own for the year 1789, but only cross-refers: „T₀89 – zob. Niedźwiadka”. The name of Kij in this line is written with a „y” („Kiy”), in keeping with the hesitation over the reading noted on the Kij card. „mał[o]letniego” — the card writes „ma” + „ł” + „letniego”, that is a contracted „małoletniego” [reading uncertain as to the manner of the abbreviation, the sense unambiguous; the same contracted form as on the Gozd card, card 2)]. „stolnika Łukowskiego” the card writes with a capital „Ł”; I record the office with a small letter, as on the remaining cards. The abbreviation „w pos.” (= w posesji, in possession) I do not expand in the text. Propination is stated outright. The wording is a twin of the T₀89 on the Gozd card (card 2), but it is not a copy of it: there the talk is of the „wsi” (Gozd), here of Niedźwiadka and Kij together.
One entry for the whole village, the numbering „1” editorial: the register does not divide Niedźwiadka into holdings. The figure „10” is underlined on the card. These 10 hearths are the figure for THE VILLAGE OF NIEDŹWIADKA within the Gozd estate, not for the whole estate: the Gozd card (card 1) gives in the same T90 extract „folwark Gozd – dymów wiejskich 2giej klasy – 20”, and the Kij card (card) „folwark Kij – 1”. The formula „dymów wiejskich 2giej klasy” runs just as it does at Gozd, Kij, Annonin (card) and Lipniaki (card 1). The abbreviated forename „Franc.” I expand on the basis of the T94 and T₀89 of the same card, where the full „Franciszka” stands. Franciszek Domaszewski appears here as the hereditary owner („dziedz.”), not as a possessor; this line names no guardian — unlike the T90 on the Gozd card, where Paweł Domaszewski was added.
One entry for the whole village, the numbering „1” editorial. The result agrees to the single hearth with the T90 of the same card (10 hearths). In this extract the card gives beside Franciszek Domaszewski neither an office nor any mention of a guardian — just as T94 does on the cards of Gozd (card 2) and Kij (card). The wording confirms that Niedźwiadka is an appurtenance of the Gozd estate and not a separate estate complex (klucz); the Gozd card names the appurtenances by name: „folwark Gozd, wieś Niedźwiadka, folwark Kij”.
Wólka Domaszewskaparafia Łuków
A BREWERY and an INN — both abbreviated („brow.”, „karcz.”), both read with certainty, without magnification: the words stand in a clean, wide line, in the same order as in the T89 of Domaszewnica („1 dwór, 1 browar, 1 karczma, 1 młyn…”), and the sum of the buildings agrees with the number of hearths given by the card, which confirms the reading. There is no mill here. The card does not set a „1” before the manor house, the brewery and the inn — it writes them without a numeral, one of each; in the breakdown of buildings they are recorded as 1. The surname on this card is through „-ew-”: „Domaszewskiego” (in the T90 of the same village „Domaszowskiego”). THE CROSS-REFERENCE NOTE „zob. pod Żolibór;”: it stands in a separate, indented line beneath the total, in the same hand; the middle word is cramped and I read it as „pod” [reading uncertain — it may also be „na” or „przy”], but the sense of the cross-reference is unambiguous: the holding of the Dominican monastery of Żolibór is to be looked for under the heading Żolibór. The direction of the cross-reference itself (to Żolibór, and NOT to Domaszewnica) is certain — the name „Żolibór” is legible and agrees with „konwentu Żoliborskiego” of T90 on card 1).
The heading line of the extract, before the second sentence — hence the no. „0”, as in the T₀89 of Domaszewnica. It concerns the grange. PROPINATION — the word is written out in full („propinacja”), not abbreviated; the reading is certain, the letters clean, without corrections. „panszcz.” = pańszczyzna, corvée; a marker from outside the glossary I do not assume. The name of the village in the locative: „w Wólce Domaszowskiej”. The office is given here more briefly than in T89 — simply „stolnika Łukowskiego”.
The surname on this card is written through „-ow-”: „Domaszowskiego”, just as in the T75 and T90 of neighbouring Domaszewnica; in T89 and T₀89 on card 2) the same person is written „Domaszewskiego”. I leave the form of the card. THE OFFICE: the card writes „stolnika Ziemi i podstarosty Łukowskiej”, drawing both offices together into a single adjective in the feminine gender („Łukowskiej” — from „ziemi łukowskiej”); T89 expands this correctly to „stolnika ziemi i podstarosty grodzkiego łukowskiego”. This is the same Paweł Domaszewski who in Domaszewnica holds 49 hearths — but these are TWO DIFFERENT villages and two different entries, and they must not be added together as one. The figure 20 is underlined twice.
This surname in full edition of the hearth-tax registers — together with the search across all persons, the comparison of figures through the registers, the modern map and the Perthées engraving of 1786.
