Home › Castle court records / Old sources › The hearth-tax registers 1775–1794 › Surnames › Szlubowski
Hearth Tax Registers of the Łuków Land 1775–1794
Szlubowski
separate records 5 · places 5 · registers 1789, 1790
Dear reader, remember that this is an AI study, that it may contain errors; treat it as indicative and verify it for yourself.
„Separate entries for persons” means: separate entries of a given name with a surname and a byname, not persons proved to have existed. The same man recorded in four registers is one entry, but two namesakes from the same village are sometimes impossible to tell apart, and over twenty years a parcel could pass to a son of the same name. The hearths given at a collective entry are an equal division among those named — a calculation, not a reading.
| Year | Source | Entries | Persons | Hearths |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1789 | Hearth tax register 1789 | 5 | 5 | 84,0 |
| 1789 | List of possessors of holdings of 1789 | 4 | 4 | — |
| 1790 | Hearth tax register 1790 | 5 | 5 | 80,0 |
The year 1789 stands twice in the table, and rightly so: these are two different sources. The register gives the hearths, the list of parcel-holders does not — which is why the list carries a dash and not a zero, and the hearths of 1789 are not counted twice.
No entry from 1775 and 1794. This is the absence of the surname in the cards transcribed so far, not proof that the family was not there then: in the card file the 1794 register covers fewer villages than the others, and the 1775 one sometimes counts a whole starosty in a single entry, without surnames.
Where the surname occurs
The localities in which the card file records this surname, with the number of entries and of the hearths falling to it in each village.
- Stara GąskaTuchowiczrecords 3 · hearths 26,0
- KierzkówTuchowiczrecords 3 · hearths 36,0
- SarnówTuchowiczrecords 3 · hearths 48,0
- ŚwiderkiŁukówrecords 3 · hearths 46,0
- Szczygły DolneŁukówrecords 2 · hearths 8,0
offices and dignities swordbearer (miecznik) and civil-military commissioner of the Krasnystaw district surveyor and civil-military commissioner of the Krasnystaw district (miernik i komisarz cywilno-wojskowy powiatu krasnostawskiego) deputy starost of Krasnystaw (podstarości krasnostawski) deputy starost of Krasnystaw (podstarosta krasnostawski) vice-starost of Krasnystaw (wicestarosta krasnostawski)
establishments recorded with this surname brewery Sarnów Stara Gąska Świderki inn Kierzków Sarnów Stara Gąska Świderki mill Sarnów Świderki propination (the right to sell drink) Kierzków Sarnów Stara Gąska Świderki
The card-index entries
All the extracts for this surname in the wording of the cards. One block is one occurrence: this person, in this register. In a collective entry the same text of the card stands beside every person named — because the card names them together, and they must not be separated.
Stara Gąskaparafia Tuchowicz
The abbreviation of the office is written „vicestar.” — the first letter as in „vicesgerenta” on card, and so a Latin form, not „wicestar.”; the expansion („vicestar[osty] krasnostaw[skiego]”) is editorial [reading uncertain as to the v/w]. In T89 the same Szlubowski bears a different title („podstarośćy krasnostaw.”), and in T90 a different one again — the card index does not reconcile these titles.
After the siglum „T90 –” the card gives no name of the village; the line begins at once with the formula. The figure 13 is underlined (the section's own total). The card index writes „woyskowego”, „dobr”, „krasnostawskiego” without diacritics — the wording is rendered literally. The word „miecznika” is legible (m-i-e-c-z-n-i-k-a), without a designation of the land.
Kierzkówparafia Tuchowicz
The whole village as an appurtenance of Sarnów, not a holding. Unlike Gąska (card), there is here neither a manor house nor a brewery: 1 inn + 16 cottages + 1 cottage = 18 d., in agreement with the underlined „= 18 d.” and with the totals of T90 and T94. The title is written „podstarosty Krasnostaw.” (on the Gąska card the same man has „podstarośćy krasnostaw.”); the expansion „podstarosta krasnostawski” is editorial. The figure „1” in „o 1 gosp.” is heavily corrected with the pen — just as on card [reading uncertain as to the corrected figure; the reckoning 1+16+1=18 confirms it]. The end of the line has been reworked: the original navy-blue „o gr. bez gruntu ogr.” was struck out with a horizontal stroke, and above it there was added in black ink the sign „z” (over the „o”) together with the ending „odem”, which gives „1 chat. z ogrodem”. The superscribed sign can also be read as the figure „2” („1 chat. o 2 ogrodem”), but that reading is ungrammatical [reading uncertain]. The reckoning of the hearths does not depend on this correction.
The siglum with a distinct zero subscript („T₀89”) — a list of possessors for 1789, without hearths. The abbreviation of the office is written „vicestar.”, the first letter like a „v” — just as on the Gąska card (card); the expansion („vicestar[osty] krasnostaw[skiego]”) is editorial [reading uncertain as to the v/w]. The last word, in the second line, I read „propinacyą” (the instrumental, an older spelling); „propinacją” is also possible [reading uncertain].
After the siglum „T90 –” the card gives no name of the village; the line begins with a formula referring to the Sarnów estate. The figure 18 is underlined (the section's own total). The word „wsi” after „Do” is written thickly, the pen went over it twice — this is a correction by the author, not a striking out [reading uncertain]. „miecznika” I read as on the Gąska card (card): after „mie” stands a round „c”, then „z”, and only further on „nika”; at this resolution „miernika” is also possible [reading uncertain]. The card index writes „woyskowego” without diacritics — the wording is rendered literally.
Sarnówparafia Tuchowicz
The person is given by the heading of the section („Józefa Szlubowskiego podstarosty krasnostawskiego”), not by the line of buildings itself. The title is written in abbreviated form („podstarosty krasnostawskiego”); the expansion „podstarości krasnostawski” is editorial — on the Gąska card the same hand writes „podstarośćy krasnostaw.” [reading uncertain]. The reckoning of the buildings: 1 manor house + 1 brewery + 1 inn + 2 mills + 1 cottage + 17 cottages + 1 cottage + 1 cottage = 25 d., in agreement with the card's total; the cottages are counted singly regardless of the number of householders (just as in the breakdowns of Krasusy). Three places corrected with a thick pen: the figure „2” in „o 2 gosp.”, the figure „1” in „17 chat. o 1 gosp.” and the preposition „z” in „z ogrodem”, written over a struck-out „bez gruntu” — that is, the editor changed a cottage without land into a cottage with a garden [reading uncertain as to the corrected figures; the reckoning confirms them]. „= 25 d.” is underlined. The names of the appurtenances in the heading: „Kierzkow” (on card 1) the heading writes „Kierzków”, T94 „Kierszkow”), „Swiderki” — without a visible diacritic over the S, although in T94 on card 2) the same hand writes „Świderki” [reading uncertain], „Wroblina” without the stroke over the o.
The office is abbreviated „vicestar.”, a Latin form; the expansion („vicestar[osty] krasnostaw[skiego]”) is editorial [reading uncertain as to v/w]. The abbreviation „wś dziedz.” = „wieś dziedziczna”, a hereditary village; the sheet of headings read this word as „Niedźwiadka”, which the card rules out. Szlubowski is here called the hereditary owner, although O83 (1783) makes Michał Krasiński the hereditary owner — the card index does not explain this contradiction.
„dymów 23” is underlined (the section's own total). The title is written out in full, without abbreviations; the same formula as on the card of Gąska (card), there directed „do Sarnowa z przyległościami”. The extract concerns the grange of Sarnów itself — the appurtenances have cards and hearth figures of their own.
Świderkiparafia Łuków
The buildings add up to the card's total: 1 brewery + 1 inn + 2 mills + 20 cottages = 24 hearths. The abbreviations „brow.” and „karcz.” are read with certainty and checked on both impressions of this card (cards 1) and 722). The abbreviation „mł.” (mills) was checked under magnification by comparison with the „ł” in the word „przyległość” from the same line — a loop with a crossbar, not a „t” (cf. „chat.” in the same line, where the „t” has no loop); the mill is confirmed by O83 as well. At „o 1 gosp.” the figure is corrected and struck through — [reading uncertain] as to the figure itself, it does not affect the total.
The word „propinacja” is written out in full, without abbreviation, and read with certainty (card 2), strip c).
The figure „22” is doubly underlined on the card — it is at the same time the total of the extract. The word „miecznika” is written in abbreviated form and with a ligature; the reading is confirmed by the twin extract of T90 at Sarnów (card 1), where the same office is written out in the same way.
Szczygły Dolneparafia Łuków
the wording stands before the numbered list of holdings and does not enter its total („Razem 15 d.”), exactly like the analogous addition of T90 on card 4)
a separate addition of T90 on card 4, outside the list of ten holdings closed on card 2 with the total „Razem 15 dymów”; it concerns the hearths which in Szczygły belong to the estate complex (klucz) of the village of Sarnów
the surname corrected on the card, the letters after the „S” reworked — I read „Szlubowskiego” [reading uncertain]
This surname in full edition of the hearth-tax registers — together with the search across all persons, the comparison of figures through the registers, the modern map and the Perthées engraving of 1786.
