Skip to content
Let us seek what unites us, and avoid what divides us

HomeCastle court records / Old sourcesThe hearth-tax registers 1775–1794SurnamesOhniński

Hearth Tax Registers of the Łuków Land 1775–1794

Ohniński

separate records 1 · places 1 · registers 1775–1794

Dear reader, remember that this is an AI study, that it may contain errors; treat it as indicative and verify it for yourself.

Separate entries for persons
1
Occurrences on the cards
1
Hearths in total
0,0
Localities
1
of these, recorded as deceased
1

„Separate entries for persons” means: separate entries of a given name with a surname and a byname, not persons proved to have existed. The same man recorded in four registers is one entry, but two namesakes from the same village are sometimes impossible to tell apart, and over twenty years a parcel could pass to a son of the same name. The hearths given at a collective entry are an equal division among those named — a calculation, not a reading.

YearSourceEntriesPersonsHearths
1789List of possessors of holdings of 178911

Where the surname occurs

The localities in which the card file records this surname, with the number of entries and of the hearths falling to it in each village.

The card-index entries

All the extracts for this surname in the wording of the cards. One block is one occurrence: this person, in this register. In a collective entry the same text of the card stands beside every person named — because the card names them together, and they must not be separated.

Borki-SołdyZbuczyn parish

OhnińskiJakub
1789List of possessors of holdings of 1789
T₀89successors† deceaseddoes not sow 10 korce brace„ sukcesorów Bartłomieja Borkowskiego i Jakuba Ohnińskiego / zaprzys. Wojciech Głuchowskicard 5)

the same entry also names: Borkowski Bartłomiej †, Głuchowski Wojciech3 persons on a holding without hearths

The entry under the brace „nie wysiewają 10 korcy”; the last on the card. „sukcesorów” is written in a contracted abbreviation: an „s” with a horizontal stroke over the following letters and the ending „rów” — the same as the spelled-out „sukcesorów” in T94 on card 4. The genitive takes in both persons joined by the conjunction „i”, so I read that both are dead — Bartłomiej Borkowski and Jakub Ohniński; if „sukcesorów” referred only to the first, Jakub would be a living co-possessor [to be resolved by the owner]. I do not expand the abbreviation „zaprzys.”.
the surname [reading uncertain] — it reads „Ohnińskiego”; the second letter is a loop passing in an arc into the next one, and not the author's „k” (which has a distinct angle and a foot, as in „Borkowskiego” in the same line). In the neighbourhood „Okniński” is attested, but I do not bend the reading to it

This surname in full edition of the hearth-tax registers — together with the search across all persons, the comparison of figures through the registers, the modern map and the Perthées engraving of 1786.