Skip to content
Let us seek what unites us, and avoid what divides us

HomeCastle court records / Old sourcesThe hearth-tax registers 1775–1794SurnamesWysaliński

Hearth Tax Registers of the Łuków Land 1775–1794

Wysaliński

separate records 1 · places 1 · registers 1789

Dear reader, remember that this is an AI study, that it may contain errors; treat it as indicative and verify it for yourself.

Separate entries for persons
1
Occurrences on the cards
1
Hearths in total
1,0
Localities
1

„Separate entries for persons” means: separate entries of a given name with a surname and a byname, not persons proved to have existed. The same man recorded in four registers is one entry, but two namesakes from the same village are sometimes impossible to tell apart, and over twenty years a parcel could pass to a son of the same name. The hearths given at a collective entry are an equal division among those named — a calculation, not a reading.

YearSourceEntriesPersonsHearths
1789Hearth tax register 1789111,0

No entry from 1775, 1790 and 1794. This is the absence of the surname in the cards transcribed so far, not proof that the family was not there then: in the card file the 1794 register covers fewer villages than the others, and the 1775 one sometimes counts a whole starosty in a single entry, without surnames.

Where the surname occurs

The localities in which the card file records this surname, with the number of entries and of the hearths falling to it in each village.

The card-index entries

All the extracts for this surname in the wording of the cards. One block is one occurrence: this person, in this register. In a collective entry the same text of the card stands beside every person named — because the card names them together, and they must not be separated.

BzówZbuczyn parish

WysalińskaMałgorzata
1789Hearth tax register 1789
T891 hearth1 manor houseJ) cz. Małg. Wysalińskiej „ 1 dwórcard 3)
A WOMAN — the surname in the feminine form. Surname [reading uncertain]: „Wysalińskiej”; the fifth letter is a narrow, tall loop without a foot, hence „l”, not „k” (compared with the „k” in the ending „-skiej” of the same word). The form „Wysokińska”, attested in the card index and in the castle court books, does NOT fit this reading — I do not bend it to match. [to be resolved by the owner]

This surname in full edition of the hearth-tax registers — together with the search across all persons, the comparison of figures through the registers, the modern map and the Perthées engraving of 1786.