separate records 2 · places 1 · registers 1775, 1790, 1794
Dear reader, remember that this is an AI study, that it may contain errors; treat it as indicative and verify it for yourself.
Separate entries for persons
2
Occurrences on the cards
3
Hearths in total
3,0
Localities
1
of these, recorded as deceased
1
„Separate entries for persons” means: separate entries of a given name with a surname and a byname, not persons proved to have existed. The same man recorded in four registers is one entry, but two namesakes from the same village are sometimes impossible to tell apart, and over twenty years a parcel could pass to a son of the same name. The hearths given at a collective entry are an equal division among those named — a calculation, not a reading.
Year
Source
Entries
Persons
Hearths
1775
Hearth tax register 1775
1
1
1,0
1790
Hearth tax register 1790
1
1
1,0
1794
Hearth tax register 1794
1
1
1,0
No entry from 1789. This is the absence of the surname in the cards transcribed so far, not proof that the family was not there then: in the card file the 1794 register covers fewer villages than the others, and the 1775 one sometimes counts a whole starosty in a single entry, without surnames.
Where the surname occurs
The localities in which the card file records this surname, with the number of entries and of the hearths falling to it in each village.
All the extracts for this surname in the wording of the cards. One block is one occurrence: this person, in this register. In a collective entry the same text of the card stands beside every person named — because the card names them together, and they must not be separated.
The words „cz. Szymonowey” are underlined on the card with one horizontal stroke running ALONG the baseline, below the letters, not through them — this is an underlining, not a striking-out; the neighbouring entries (3, 4) have no underlining. That Szymon Łęczycki was already dead is confirmed by T90 (card 2), entry B) and T94 (card 4), entry 3): „sukces. Szymona Łęczyckiego”.
A WOMAN. The card gives no forename of her own, only the husband-derived form „Szymonowey” — recorded literally in the recorded form of the name, the given name is left empty. I do not expand it: the card does not say which Szymon she was the wife of.
It agrees with card 1 (T75 entry 2), where it stands „cz. Szymonowey Łęczyckiey wdowy” — Szymon Łęczycki was already dead by then.
ŁęczyckiSzymon†
1794Hearth tax register 1794
T941 hearthsuccessors† deceasedcz. sukcesorów Szymona Łęczyckiego 1 d. ;card 4)
This surname in full edition of the hearth-tax registers — together with the search across all persons, the comparison of figures through the registers, the modern map and the Perthées engraving of 1786.
