father Jan Kobylański
spouse Magdalena Górska
entries 31 1803 1804 1805

Home › Castle court records / Old sources › The Łuków castle court records 1743–1744 › Surnames › Kobylański
The Łuków castle court records 1743–1744
persons 8 · entries 6 · years 1743–1744
Dear reader, remember that this is an AI study, that it may contain errors; treat it as indicative and verify it for yourself.
„Persons (different given names)” means: different combinations of a given name with a byname, not persons proved to have existed. Two namesakes from one family merge here into a single item, and the acts give nothing to tell them apart. An entry naming several families stands beside each of them — because the record names them together, and they must not be separated.
forms of the name in the acts Kobylańska Kobylański
The persons of this surname in the acts, with the number of entries and with the kinships the record states outright.
father Jan Kobylański
spouse Magdalena Górska
entries 31 1803 1804 1805
father Jakub Kobylański
spouse Marianna Sawicka
entries 239 265
father Jan Kobylański
entries 31
entries 265
father Jan Kobylański
entries 31
father Jan Kobylański
entries 31
father Jan Kobylański
entries 31
father Jan Kobylański
spouse Paweł Paskudzki
entries 31
The localities beside which the acts name this surname, with the number of entries.
Fragments of families assembled from the kinships the acts state outright. One fragment is as much as a single entry, or a group of entries, allows to be joined without guessing — not a whole family tree, only a certain piece of one.
confidence A — a single act
The whole structure comes from a single act (entry 31). Type of act: Compromise.
confidence A — a single act
The whole structure comes from a single act (entry 265). Type of act: Cession of a sum of 50 złp.
Every entry in which the acts name this surname. With each one: the chancery date in translation, the folio of the register, the kind of act, an outline of the case, and the persons and localities named in the entry.
kind of case Compromise and arbitration court (compromissum) compromissum; electio superarbitri
Compromise (an inscription referring the case to an arbitration court) – the choice of a superarbiter and arbiters
active party Józef Kobylański Gen. · Party
passive party Marcin Tchórzewski Gen. · Party
persons in the entry Józef Kobylański (son of the late Jan Kobylański) in his own name and in the name of his brothers and sisters german: Antoni, Walenty and Jan Kobylański, Marianna (a widow) and Zofia, wife of Paweł Paskudzki – first party; Marcin Tchórzewski (son of the late Stanisław Tchórzewski called Szymańczyk) in his own name and in the name of Ignacy and Antoni Tchórzewski and of the daughter of Szymon Tchórzewski, his sisters german – second party; Jan Franciszek Jezierski, sword-bearer of Liw, clerk (notary) of the Łuków castle court – superarbiter
localities in the entry the Tchórzew Ziemiański estate; Łuków
The well-born (Gen.): Józef Kobylański, son of the late well-born (Gen.) Jan Kobylański, on the one side, and Marcin Tchórzewski, son of the late well-born (Gen.) Stanisław Tchórzewski called Szymańczyk, on the other side, being of sound mind and body, deposed – Józef Kobylański in his own name and in the name of the well-born (Gen.) Antoni, Walenty and Jan, and likewise of Marianna, a widow, and of Zofia, wife of the well-born (Gen.) Paweł Paskudzki, Kobylański, his brothers and sisters german; and Marcin Tchórzewski in his own name and in the name of the well-born (Gen.) Ignacy and Antoni Tchórzewski, and also of the daughter of Szymon Tchórzewski, his sisters german – for whom they mutually stand surety and bind themselves in the fullest form of law – that for the settling of the suits and actions mutually brought against each other before the court of the Łuków castle office they choose, appoint and obtain as supreme judge and superarbiter the magnificent (Magn.) Jan Franciszek Jezierski, sword-bearer of Liw and clerk of the Łuków castle court. That magnificent (Magn.) superarbiter, together with the Lords Arbiters – two called by each side – is to come upon the ground of the Tchórzew Ziemiański estate on the Tuesday after the feast of the Conversion of St Paul the Apostle of the current year, that is on 29 January, and first of all to examine the lawfulness of the suit obtained by the party of the above-named Tchórzewski upon the Kobylański estate and of the delivery (intromission) subject to execution by virtue of it; that suit he is to dissolve, cancel or confirm, and also to rule on the remission of the penalties upon the decision of the principal case, out of which the condemnations were issued. Next he is to order the lodging of the documents (muniments) by whomever it may concern, and to require their genuineness to be proved on oath; those documents he will examine: the defective ones and those contrary to natural law he will cancel, the sound ones he will keep in force. Once they have been lodged, he is to separate the substance (property) of the Tchórzewskis from the substance of the Kobylańskis and to award it according to the mind of law and justice; and the maternal substance, movable and immovable, whatever it may prove to be, he will divide among the successors, preserving natural law. Further, the remaining claims, from whatever source they arise, and likewise the acts of violence and all the other heads contained in the court terms and expressed in the mutual protestations – on the basis of the inquisitions carried out – he will settle, mitigate and finally decide, leaving nothing untouched that concerns the above circumstances. To the decision of that magnificent (Magn.) superarbiter together with the Lords Arbiters both parties undertake to submit and hereby so inscribe themselves. Should they oppose the order here inscribed – they declare that they fall under the penalty of banishment, to be adjudged forthwith by the magnificent (Magn.) superarbiter and there and then, at that same term, proclaimed, and they submit themselves entirely to his authority, notwithstanding the withdrawal of one of the Lords Arbiters brought in by the party opposing; promising and inscribing that whatever shall be decided by the said magnificent (Magn.) superarbiter together with the Lords Arbiters they will hold valid, firm and lasting.
notes and marginalia The entry begins on scan 009 (f. 6r) and ends on scan 010 (f. 6v). The date of the on-site session (condescension) is given outright: 29 January 1743.
date as the chancery wrote it (under the date of the Tuesday after St Agnes's 1743)
kind of case Quittance and cancellation of an inscription (quietatio, cassatio) quietatio; cassatio inscriptionis
Mutual quittance: a suit over the taking of hay, a beating and wounds; cancellation of the decree of condescension
active party Mateusz Kobylański Nob. · Party
passive party Antoni Radzikowski Nob. · Party
persons in the entry Mateusz Kobylański, in his own name and in the name of his wife Marianna née Sawicka – the first party; Antoni Radzikowski – the second party
localities in the entry the Łuków castle court office
The noble (Nob.) Mateusz Kobylański, in his own name and in the name of the noble (Nob.) Marianna née Sawicka, his wife, for whom he stands surety, on the one side, and Antoni Radzikowski on the other side, being of sound mind and body, deposed that mutually and reciprocally they give a quittance to one another and to their successors: the noble (Nob.) Kobylański to the said noble (Nob.) Radzikowski – for the suit and official action brought and lodged on account of the taking of hay and of the violent oppression and the infliction of wounds during that taking; further, for the protestations, the relations and all the decrees, and in particular the last one of condescension. And the noble (Nob.) Radzikowski to the said Kobylański – for the protestation together with an inspection of wounds, made before the present records on the Friday, on the very day of the feast of St Margaret, Virgin and Martyr, in the Year of Our Lord 1741, as also for the claims for the wages earned (mercedes) and for twelve Polish złoty held by him. And this by reason of the satisfaction mutually rendered and of the actual payment of the penalties adjudged by the decree of condescension; the protestations, the relations and the decree of condescension they cancel.
notes and marginalia Beneath the entry an autograph signature: „Mateusz Kobylanski”.
date as the chancery wrote it (under the same date)
kind of case Quittance and cancellation of an inscription (quietatio, cassatio) quietatio; cassatio inscriptionis
Cession of a sum of 50 złp (out of an original sum of 200 złp); quittance for the suit begun
active party Franciszek Radzikowski Nob. · Party
passive party Mateusz Kobylański Nob. · Acquirer
value 200
persons in the entry Franciszek Radzikowski called Buyno, son of the late Tomasz and of the late Anna née Radzikowska, in his own name and in the name of his wife Elżbieta Radzikowska (daughter of the late Maciej Radzikowski and of Marianna née Radzikowska, of her first marriage with Kazimierz Pióro) – the cedent; Mateusz Kobylański, son of the late Jakub – the cessionary; Maciej Wysokiński called Prusak – the original debtor; the late Marianna Piórówna, daughter of Piotr Pióro, 1° voto wife of the late Wojciech Wysokiński; Marianna née Radzikowska – her maternal cousin; Kazimierz Pióro
localities in the entry the Łuków castle court records; the Warsaw castle court records
The noble (Nob.) Franciszek Radzikowski called Buyno, son of the late noble (Nob.) Tomasz, begotten of the late noble (Nob.) Anna Radzikowska, in his own name and in the name of the noble (Nob.) Elżbieta Radzikowska – daughter of the late noble (Nob.) Maciej Radzikowski, begotten of the noble (Nob.) Marianna née Radzikowska of the first bed, of her marriage with the noble (Nob.) Kazimierz Pióro – his lawful wife, for whose ratification he stands surety, being of sound mind and body, deposed that to the noble (Nob.) Mateusz Kobylański, son of the late noble (Nob.) Jakub, and to his successors he cedes and makes over the sum of fifty Polish złoty, out of an original sum of two hundred Polish złoty. That sum was originally inscribed by the noble (Nob.) Maciej Wysokiński called Prusak to the late noble (Nob.) Marianna Piórówna, daughter of the noble (Nob.) Piotr Pióro, by her first marriage the wife of the late noble (Nob.) Wojciech Wysokiński; and afterwards to the noble (Nob.) Marianna née Radzikowska, her maternal cousin, before the present records on the Tuesday after Rogation Sunday in the year 1720, by way of a debt; and finally it was ceded to him, the deponent, and to his absent wife by that same noble (Nob.) Marianna née Radzikowska – with the participation of the noble (Nob.) Kazimierz Pióro, before the Warsaw castle court records on the Wednesday after Septuagesima Sunday of the current year 1743 – together with other sums charged upon other estates. Having received that sum from the hands of the present cessionary, he cedes it with everything; and further he gives a quittance for the suit begun over that sum.
date as the chancery wrote it (under the same date)
This entry is awaiting an English translation; below stands the Polish translation from the Latin.
kind of case Cession of a sum (cessio summae) cessio summae
active party Anna Lasocka Gen. · pantler of Zakroczym · Party
passive party Anna Lasocka Gen. · Party
This entry is awaiting an English translation; below stands the Polish translation from the Latin.
kind of case Inscription of a sum and dower settlement (inscriptio, dotalitium) inscriptio simplicis debiti; dotalitium et reformatio
active party Michał Krasiński Magn. · Party
passive party Anna Lasocka Gen. · Party
This entry is awaiting an English translation; below stands the Polish translation from the Latin.
kind of case Settlement and composition (complanatio) complanatio amicabilis
active party Anna Lasocka Gen. · pantler of Zakroczym · Party
passive party Jan Kobylański Gen. · Party
This surname in full edition of the castle court records — together with the search across all entries, the family cards with their trees, the prosopography and the study of the source.