Home › Castle court records / Old sources › The Łuków castle court records 1743–1744 › Surnames › Krasiński

The Łuków castle court records 1743–1744

Krasiński

persons 3 · entries 10 · years 1743–1744

Dear reader, remember that this is an AI study, that it may contain errors; treat it as indicative and verify it for yourself.

Persons (different given names)

Entries in the records

Occurrences in the acts

Years

1743–1744

„Persons (different given names)” means: different combinations of a given name with a byname, not persons proved to have existed. Two namesakes from one family merge here into a single item, and the acts give nothing to tell them apart. An entry naming several families stands beside each of them — because the record names them together, and they must not be separated.

forms of the name in the acts Krasińska Krasiński

Persons

The persons of this surname in the acts, with the number of entries and with the kinships the record states outright.

KrasińskiMichałMagn.7

spouse Aleksandra Krasińska, Aleksandra Załuska

entries 679 1257 1277 1803 1804 1805 1960

KrasińskiMichał HieronimMagn.3

spouse Aleksandra Krasińska, Aleksandra Załuska

entries 1328 1615 1616

KrasińskaAleksandraMagn.2

spouse Michał Hieronim Krasiński, Michał Krasiński

entries 1277 1328

Localities and estates

The localities beside which the acts name this surname, with the number of entries.

Staninentries 2
Stężycaentries 2
Gęszkoentries 1
Gozdentries 1
Gózdka and Wróblinaentries 1
Jeleniecentries 1
Kraśna Wolaentries 1
Tchórzewentries 1
the Crown Tribunal in Piotrkówentries 1
Tuchowiczentries 1
Turzecentries 1
Warszawaentries 1
Wodynieentries 1

Entries

Every entry in which the acts name this surname. With each one: the chancery date in translation, the folio of the register, the kind of act, an outline of the case, and the persons and localities named in the entry.

1743chancery year

22 June 1743entry 679folio 103r–103vscan 56/106–107

kind of case Quittance and cancellation of an inscription (quietatio, cassatio) quietatio; cassatio inscriptionis

Quittance for the official suits over acts of violence and extortions upon an organist, cancellation of the protestations and relations

active party Michał Ryszkowski Perillustr. et Adm. Rev. · provost of Tuchowicz · Creditor (giving the quittance)

passive party Michał Krasiński Magn. · starostas · Debtor

persons in the entry Father Michał in Ryszki Ryszkowski, provost of Tuchowicz [the reading of the office uncertain], also in the name of Michał Całczyński, his organist – the party giving the quittance; Michał Krasiński and Aleksander Załuski, starostas [uncertain reading] – the parties quitted

localities in the entry Tuchowicz

The very reverend (Perillustr. et Adm. Rev.) Father Michał in Ryszki Ryszkowski, provost of Tuchowicz [the reading of the office uncertain], being of sound mind and body, deposed that – in his own name and in the name of the honest (Hon.) Michał Całczyński, at that time his organist, for whose peace he stands surety –

he gives a quittance to the magnificent (Magn.) Michał Krasiński and Aleksander Załuski, starostas of His Royal Majesty and of the Commonwealth [uncertain reading], and to the others entering into the process, and to their successors, for the suits and official actions brought and lodged before the present office on account of certain claims and acts of violence, and likewise of extortions upon the organist, as also for the relations, the decrees and for all and each of the claims arising up to this day – by reason of the amicable settlement concluded between them, the decrees alone remaining in force in their entirety – and the protestations and relations he cancels by the present act.

[Signatures:] Fr Michał Ryszkowski; [the second signature illegible], in his own hand

notes and marginalia The entry begins on f. 103r (scan 106) and ends at the top of f. 103v (scan 107) – joined. The case concerns acts of violence and extortions upon the organist of the church of Tuchowicz. The second signature beneath the entry is illegible. The titulature and the office of the deponent are in part uncertain readings.

date as the chancery wrote it under the date of the session: Sabbatho in Vigilia Festi Nativitatis S. Joannis Baptistae Anno Domini 1743

1744chancery year

12 March 1744entry 1257folio 31v–32rscan 57/033

kind of case Compromise and arbitration court (compromissum) compromissum; electio superarbitri

Quittance for marks and penalties reduced by an amicable settlement to 70 złp, together with the transfer of the right to receive them

active party Andrzej Jaszowski Gen. · vicegerent of Łuków · Creditor (giving the quittance)

passive party Michał Krasiński Magn. · starosta · Creditor

value 70

persons in the entry Andrzej Jaszowski, vicegerent of Łuków [uncertain reading] – the party giving the quittance; Michał Krasiński, starosta [uncertain reading] – in whose favour the quittance is given; Karol Załuski, starosta [uncertain reading] – party to the original decree; Antoni Modrzewski, subdelegate – before whom the deposition was made

localities in the entry —

The well-born (Gen.) Andrzej Jaszowski, vicegerent of Łuków [uncertain reading], being of sound mind and body, deposed that to the magnificent (Magn.) Michał Krasiński, starosta of […] [uncertain reading], and to his successors – for the marks and penalties adjudged by a decree of the present office issued in the year 1743 between him, the deponent, on the one side and the magnificent (Magn.) Karol Załuski, starosta of […], on the other, and reduced by an amicable settlement to the sum of seventy Polish złoty, both by virtue of the [withdrawal] from the decree and by way of a penalty for its transgression – [he yields up]; and every power of giving and of receiving that same sum and of giving a quittance for what is received he transfers to him.

[Autograph signature:] Andreas Jaszowski Before the subdelegate, the well-born (Gen.) Antoni Modrzewski.

notes and marginalia The entry passes from the left-hand page of scan 57-033 (f. 31v) to the right-hand one (f. 32r). The surname of the deponent in the manuscript looks like „Zapowski/Zapolski”, but his **autograph signature beneath the entry reads „Andreas Jaszowski”**, which agrees with the PTG tag – the discrepancy resolved by the signature, not by conjecture. The starosty offices of both magnates (Krasiński, Załuski) are written in abbreviation and are illegible – they have not been supplied. A new official receiving the entries appears: the subdelegate Antoni Modrzewski.

date as the chancery wrote it (under the same date)

17 March 1744entry 1277card 34vscan 57/036

kind of case Mortgage of estates (inscriptio obligatoria) inscriptio obligatoria (oppignoratio bonorum)

Mutual quittance: 576 złp under hand-written bonds and 100 złp of interest upon a sum of 1000 złp; the return of a pledged ring

active party Józef Spytecki Magn. · deputy pantler of Dorpat · Party

passive party Michał Krasiński Magn. · starosta · Party

value 1000

persons in the entry Józef Spytecki, deputy pantler of Dorpat – the first party; Michał Krasiński, starosta [uncertain reading], acting also in the name of his wife, for whom he stands surety – the second party; Aleksandra née Załuska Krasińska [uncertain reading] – his wife

localities in the entry —

Tuesday after Laetare Sunday in Lent, in the Year of Our Lord 1744.

The magnificent (Magn.) Józef Spytecki, deputy pantler of Dorpat, on the one side, and Michał Krasiński, starosta of […] [uncertain reading], in his own name and in the name of the magnificent (Magn.) Aleksandra née Załuska [uncertain reading], his wife, for whose ratification he stands surety, on the other side, being of sound mind and body, deposed and acknowledged that mutually and reciprocally they give a quittance to one another and to their successors, and namely:

the magnificent (Magn.) Spytecki to the magnificent (Magn.) Krasiński spouses — for two sums: the first of five hundred and seventy-six Polish złoty, contracted by hand-written bonds, and the second of one hundred Polish złoty, due by title of the interest upon a sum of one thousand Polish złoty, falling on the fifth day of July; and adjudged, together with the penalty obtained, by a decree of the present office issued on the Monday after Reminiscere Sunday in Lent of the present year between those same parties — now in fact taken up;

and in like measure the magnificent (Magn.) Krasiński spouses to the said magnificent (Magn.) Spytecki — for the return of the ring pledged to him in the said terms, the return whereof that same decree enjoined and which has now been returned otherwise, as also for the enforcement clause contained in that same decree; and the enforcement clause of that same decree they cancel.

[Autograph signature:] Josephus Spytecki, by his own hand

notes and marginalia The only magnate entry in this part of the register with sums of the order of a thousand złoty. The date of the decree cited: the Monday after Reminiscere 1744 = 2 March 1744 – the same session which entry 1203 opens, which confirms the internal reckoning of the register. A rare object of security: **a ring given in pledge** (annulus invadiatus), the return of which the decree enjoined. The starosty of Michał Krasiński and the maiden surname of his wife have been read with uncertainty; the PTG tag gives „Aleksandra Załuska?” with a question mark of its own.

date as the chancery wrote it Feria Tertia post Diem Laetare Quadragesimalem proxima Anno Domini 1744

10 April 1744entry 1328card 43vscan 57/045

kind of case Settlement and composition (complanatio) complanatio amicabilis

Official confirmation (roboratio) of a composition (komplanacja) drawn up in Warsaw, under a penalty of 7200 złp

active party Michał Hieronim Krasiński Magn. · Party

passive party Józef Spytecki Magn. · deputy pantler of Dorpat · Party

persons in the entry Michał (Hieronim) Krasiński, captain of the armies of the Kingdom and the Commonwealth, acting also in the name of his wife – the first party; Józef Spytecki, deputy pantler of Dorpat, acting also in the name of his wife – the second party; Aleksandra née Załuska Krasińska – his wife; Teodora […] Spytecka – the wife of Spytecki

localities in the entry Warsaw (the place where the composition was drawn up) [uncertain reading]

The magnificent (Magn.) Michał Krasiński, captain of the armies of the Kingdom and the Commonwealth, in his own name and in the name of the magnificent (Magn.) Aleksandra Załuska, his wife, for whom he stands surety, on the one side, and Józef Spytecki, deputy pantler of Dorpat, in his own name and in the name of the well-born (Gen.) Teodora née […], his wife, for whom he stands surety, on the other side, being of sound mind and body, deposed and acknowledged that a certain composition (komplanacja), concerning certain things and conditions expressed in it, drawn up between them, the deponents, by an act and of a date at Warsaw [uncertain reading] of the present year 1744, subscribed with their own hands and with the hands of certain [witnesses], and strengthened by a penalty of seven thousand two hundred Polish złoty – in all its conditions and obligations they strengthen and confirm, and this under a penalty of seven thousand two hundred Polish złoty, for which they appoint the present court.

[Autograph signatures:] J. Spytecki — M. Hieronim Krasiński, in his own hand

notes and marginalia **The highest amount in the whole year 1744**: a penalty of 7200 złp at the official confirmation (roboratio) of a magnate settlement drawn up in Warsaw. The autograph signature discloses the full given name of the party – „M[ichał] Hieronim Krasiński” – whereas in the text of the entry the clerk gave only „Michael”; the PTG tag for scan 57-045 records „Michał Krasiński”. The same Michał Krasiński occurs in entry 1257 (12 March 1744) as the receiver of a sum under a decree; Józef Spytecki, deputy pantler of Dorpat – in entry 1277 (17 March 1744). The place where the composition was drawn up has been read with uncertainty.

date as the chancery wrote it (under the same date)