Separate entries for persons
6
Occurrences on the cards
10
„Separate entries for persons” means: separate entries of a given name with a surname and a byname, not persons proved to have existed. The same man recorded in four registers is one entry, but two namesakes from the same village are sometimes impossible to tell apart, and over twenty years a parcel could pass to a son of the same name. The hearths given at a collective entry are an equal division among those named — a calculation, not a reading.
| Year | Source | Entries | Persons | Hearths |
|---|
| 1775 | Hearth tax register 1775 | 1 | 1 | 1,0 |
| 1789 | Hearth tax register 1789 | 4 | 4 | 5,0 |
| 1790 | Hearth tax register 1790 | 5 | 5 | 5,0 |
No entry from 1794. This is the absence of the surname in the cards transcribed so far, not proof that the family was not there then: in the card file the 1794 register covers fewer villages than the others, and the 1775 one sometimes counts a whole starosty in a single entry, without surnames.
Where the surname occurs
The localities in which the card file records this surname, with the number of entries and of the hearths falling to it in each village.
- BaranekZbuczynrecords 9 · hearths 10,0
- JasionkaZbuczynrecords 1 · hearths 1,0
The card-index entries
All the extracts for this surname in the wording of the cards. One block is one occurrence: this person, in this register. In a collective entry the same text of the card stands beside every person named — because the card names them together, and they must not be separated.
BaranekZbuczyn parish
ZielonkaAntoni
1789Hearth tax register 1789
T895 · share of 1.25T89 – Baranek, wieś Zielonków – cz. Jana, Antoniego, Franciszka, Macieja (po 1 dworze), item tychże Jana, Antoniego i Macieja Zielonków – 1 dwór = 5 dymów;card 1)
the same entry also names: Zielonka Jan, Zielonka Franciszek, Zielonka Maciej4 persons on 5 hearths
The card is corrected in the author's own hand. The phrase „po 1 dworze” originally stood at the end of the line; the author added it above the line in brackets and inserted it, with a large brace, after „Macieja,” (that is, up to the first foursome), and in the final wording struck out „po” and the ending „-ze”, leaving „1 dwór”. Hence the reckoning: 4 manor houses of the first foursome + 1 manor house shared by the second group = 5 hearths, agreeing with the card's own total („= 5 dymów”, underlined with a wavy line) and with the T90 total (5). The second group is „item tychże Jana, Antoniego i Macieja” — THE SAME persons as above, at the second, shared manor house; I therefore enter them once, without repetition, and the full wording remains in the text of the extract (seven mentions of forenames, four persons). I do not fill in the the breakdown of buildings field: „po 1 dworze” is a way of counting the hearth per person, not a breakdown of the holding's buildings — just as in the model collective entry (WZOR.json, T89 card 4, „każdy po 1 dworze”).
ZielonkaFranciszek
1789Hearth tax register 1789
T895 · share of 1.25T89 – Baranek, wieś Zielonków – cz. Jana, Antoniego, Franciszka, Macieja (po 1 dworze), item tychże Jana, Antoniego i Macieja Zielonków – 1 dwór = 5 dymów;card 1)
the same entry also names: Zielonka Jan, Zielonka Antoni, Zielonka Maciej4 persons on 5 hearths
The card is corrected in the author's own hand. The phrase „po 1 dworze” originally stood at the end of the line; the author added it above the line in brackets and inserted it, with a large brace, after „Macieja,” (that is, up to the first foursome), and in the final wording struck out „po” and the ending „-ze”, leaving „1 dwór”. Hence the reckoning: 4 manor houses of the first foursome + 1 manor house shared by the second group = 5 hearths, agreeing with the card's own total („= 5 dymów”, underlined with a wavy line) and with the T90 total (5). The second group is „item tychże Jana, Antoniego i Macieja” — THE SAME persons as above, at the second, shared manor house; I therefore enter them once, without repetition, and the full wording remains in the text of the extract (seven mentions of forenames, four persons). I do not fill in the the breakdown of buildings field: „po 1 dworze” is a way of counting the hearth per person, not a breakdown of the holding's buildings — just as in the model collective entry (WZOR.json, T89 card 4, „każdy po 1 dworze”).
ZielonkaJan
1789Hearth tax register 1789
T895 · share of 1.25T89 – Baranek, wieś Zielonków – cz. Jana, Antoniego, Franciszka, Macieja (po 1 dworze), item tychże Jana, Antoniego i Macieja Zielonków – 1 dwór = 5 dymów;card 1)
the same entry also names: Zielonka Antoni, Zielonka Franciszek, Zielonka Maciej4 persons on 5 hearths
The card is corrected in the author's own hand. The phrase „po 1 dworze” originally stood at the end of the line; the author added it above the line in brackets and inserted it, with a large brace, after „Macieja,” (that is, up to the first foursome), and in the final wording struck out „po” and the ending „-ze”, leaving „1 dwór”. Hence the reckoning: 4 manor houses of the first foursome + 1 manor house shared by the second group = 5 hearths, agreeing with the card's own total („= 5 dymów”, underlined with a wavy line) and with the T90 total (5). The second group is „item tychże Jana, Antoniego i Macieja” — THE SAME persons as above, at the second, shared manor house; I therefore enter them once, without repetition, and the full wording remains in the text of the extract (seven mentions of forenames, four persons). I do not fill in the the breakdown of buildings field: „po 1 dworze” is a way of counting the hearth per person, not a breakdown of the holding's buildings — just as in the model collective entry (WZOR.json, T89 card 4, „każdy po 1 dworze”).
ZielonkaMaciej
1789Hearth tax register 1789
T895 · share of 1.25T89 – Baranek, wieś Zielonków – cz. Jana, Antoniego, Franciszka, Macieja (po 1 dworze), item tychże Jana, Antoniego i Macieja Zielonków – 1 dwór = 5 dymów;card 1)
the same entry also names: Zielonka Jan, Zielonka Antoni, Zielonka Franciszek4 persons on 5 hearths
The card is corrected in the author's own hand. The phrase „po 1 dworze” originally stood at the end of the line; the author added it above the line in brackets and inserted it, with a large brace, after „Macieja,” (that is, up to the first foursome), and in the final wording struck out „po” and the ending „-ze”, leaving „1 dwór”. Hence the reckoning: 4 manor houses of the first foursome + 1 manor house shared by the second group = 5 hearths, agreeing with the card's own total („= 5 dymów”, underlined with a wavy line) and with the T90 total (5). The second group is „item tychże Jana, Antoniego i Macieja” — THE SAME persons as above, at the second, shared manor house; I therefore enter them once, without repetition, and the full wording remains in the text of the extract (seven mentions of forenames, four persons). I do not fill in the the breakdown of buildings field: „po 1 dworze” is a way of counting the hearth per person, not a breakdown of the holding's buildings — just as in the model collective entry (WZOR.json, T89 card 4, „każdy po 1 dworze”).
ZielonkaAntoni
1790Hearth tax register 1790
T905 · each 1possessorT90. – wieś Baranek – dobra król., przy dzierżawie Wiśniów będąca, w posesji Antoniego; Franciszka; Dominika; Jana i Macieja Zielonków – po 1 dymie – 5 dymów wiejskich 2giej klasy;card 1)
the same entry also names: Zielonka Franciszek, Zielonka Dominik, Zielonka Jan, Zielonka Maciej5 persons on 5 hearths
The whole village in one collective entry: five possessors at 1 hearth each, the card's own total „5 dymów wiejskich 2giej klasy” with the five underlined. The surname stands once, in the genitive plural („Zielonków”) — I reduce it to the nominative „Zielonka”, the form from `nazwiska.json`. „przy dzierżawie Wiśniów będąca” — the name of the leasehold read „Wiśniów”; the same leasehold stands beside Kot Wiśniowski (card: „w cirkumferencji wiszniowa”), there read „wiszniowa/wiśniowa” [reading uncertain as to „sz”/„ś”]. Dominik occurs ONLY here — he is absent both from T89 on the same card and from Ls.89 on card.
ZielonkaDominik
1790Hearth tax register 1790
T905 · each 1possessorT90. – wieś Baranek – dobra król., przy dzierżawie Wiśniów będąca, w posesji Antoniego; Franciszka; Dominika; Jana i Macieja Zielonków – po 1 dymie – 5 dymów wiejskich 2giej klasy;card 1)
the same entry also names: Zielonka Antoni, Zielonka Franciszek, Zielonka Jan, Zielonka Maciej5 persons on 5 hearths
The whole village in one collective entry: five possessors at 1 hearth each, the card's own total „5 dymów wiejskich 2giej klasy” with the five underlined. The surname stands once, in the genitive plural („Zielonków”) — I reduce it to the nominative „Zielonka”, the form from `nazwiska.json`. „przy dzierżawie Wiśniów będąca” — the name of the leasehold read „Wiśniów”; the same leasehold stands beside Kot Wiśniowski (card: „w cirkumferencji wiszniowa”), there read „wiszniowa/wiśniowa” [reading uncertain as to „sz”/„ś”]. Dominik occurs ONLY here — he is absent both from T89 on the same card and from Ls.89 on card.
ZielonkaFranciszek
1790Hearth tax register 1790
T905 · each 1possessorT90. – wieś Baranek – dobra król., przy dzierżawie Wiśniów będąca, w posesji Antoniego; Franciszka; Dominika; Jana i Macieja Zielonków – po 1 dymie – 5 dymów wiejskich 2giej klasy;card 1)
the same entry also names: Zielonka Antoni, Zielonka Dominik, Zielonka Jan, Zielonka Maciej5 persons on 5 hearths
The whole village in one collective entry: five possessors at 1 hearth each, the card's own total „5 dymów wiejskich 2giej klasy” with the five underlined. The surname stands once, in the genitive plural („Zielonków”) — I reduce it to the nominative „Zielonka”, the form from `nazwiska.json`. „przy dzierżawie Wiśniów będąca” — the name of the leasehold read „Wiśniów”; the same leasehold stands beside Kot Wiśniowski (card: „w cirkumferencji wiszniowa”), there read „wiszniowa/wiśniowa” [reading uncertain as to „sz”/„ś”]. Dominik occurs ONLY here — he is absent both from T89 on the same card and from Ls.89 on card.
ZielonkaJan
1790Hearth tax register 1790
T905 · each 1possessorT90. – wieś Baranek – dobra król., przy dzierżawie Wiśniów będąca, w posesji Antoniego; Franciszka; Dominika; Jana i Macieja Zielonków – po 1 dymie – 5 dymów wiejskich 2giej klasy;card 1)
the same entry also names: Zielonka Antoni, Zielonka Franciszek, Zielonka Dominik, Zielonka Maciej5 persons on 5 hearths
The whole village in one collective entry: five possessors at 1 hearth each, the card's own total „5 dymów wiejskich 2giej klasy” with the five underlined. The surname stands once, in the genitive plural („Zielonków”) — I reduce it to the nominative „Zielonka”, the form from `nazwiska.json`. „przy dzierżawie Wiśniów będąca” — the name of the leasehold read „Wiśniów”; the same leasehold stands beside Kot Wiśniowski (card: „w cirkumferencji wiszniowa”), there read „wiszniowa/wiśniowa” [reading uncertain as to „sz”/„ś”]. Dominik occurs ONLY here — he is absent both from T89 on the same card and from Ls.89 on card.
ZielonkaMaciej
1790Hearth tax register 1790
T905 · each 1possessorT90. – wieś Baranek – dobra król., przy dzierżawie Wiśniów będąca, w posesji Antoniego; Franciszka; Dominika; Jana i Macieja Zielonków – po 1 dymie – 5 dymów wiejskich 2giej klasy;card 1)
the same entry also names: Zielonka Antoni, Zielonka Franciszek, Zielonka Dominik, Zielonka Jan5 persons on 5 hearths
The whole village in one collective entry: five possessors at 1 hearth each, the card's own total „5 dymów wiejskich 2giej klasy” with the five underlined. The surname stands once, in the genitive plural („Zielonków”) — I reduce it to the nominative „Zielonka”, the form from `nazwiska.json`. „przy dzierżawie Wiśniów będąca” — the name of the leasehold read „Wiśniów”; the same leasehold stands beside Kot Wiśniowski (card: „w cirkumferencji wiszniowa”), there read „wiszniowa/wiśniowa” [reading uncertain as to „sz”/„ś”]. Dominik occurs ONLY here — he is absent both from T89 on the same card and from Ls.89 on card.
JasionkaZbuczyn parish
ZielonkaJakub
1775Hearth tax register 1775
T751 hearthcz. Jakóba Zielonki dym 1,card 2)
