Stoiński

separate records 3 · places 3 · registers 1790, 1794

Dear reader, remember that this is an AI study, that it may contain errors; treat it as indicative and verify it for yourself.

Separate entries for persons

Occurrences on the cards

Hearths in total

28,0

Localities

of these, recorded as deceased

„Separate entries for persons” means: separate entries of a given name with a surname and a byname, not persons proved to have existed. The same man recorded in four registers is one entry, but two namesakes from the same village are sometimes impossible to tell apart, and over twenty years a parcel could pass to a son of the same name. The hearths given at a collective entry are an equal division among those named — a calculation, not a reading.

Year	Source	Entries	Persons	Hearths
1790	Hearth tax register 1790	1	1	6,0
1794	Hearth tax register 1794	3	3	22,0

No entry from 1775 and 1789. This is the absence of the surname in the cards transcribed so far, not proof that the family was not there then: in the card file the 1794 register covers fewer villages than the others, and the 1775 one sometimes counts a whole starosty in a single entry, without surnames.

Where the surname occurs

The localities in which the card file records this surname, with the number of entries and of the hearths falling to it in each village.

LipniakTuchowiczrecords 1 · hearths 2,0
Wólka ZastawskaTuchowiczrecords 1 · hearths 8,0
ZastawieTuchowiczrecords 2 · hearths 18,0

The card file also records the form Stoińska entries: 1 localities: 1 We record a surname as it stands on the card, because the feminine form is sometimes the only sign that the person is a woman; the two entries therefore stay separate. Whether this is the same family is for the reader to decide, not for this list.

offices and dignities deputy cupbearer of Lublin (podczaszy lubelski)

establishments recorded with this surname inn Lipniak Zastawie

The card-index entries

All the extracts for this surname in the wording of the cards. One block is one occurrence: this person, in this register. In a collective entry the same text of the card stands beside every person named — because the card names them together, and they must not be separated.

Lipniakparafia Tuchowicz

Stoiński

1794Hearth tax register 1794

T942 hearthsinnT94. - Karczma na Lipniaku Stoińskiego, do dóbr wsi Zastawia, 2 dymy;card 3)

The only entry of this village that names a private person, and the only one that does NOT concern the Dominican estates: the inn stands „na Lipniaku”, but belongs to the estate of the village of Zastawie. The figure 2 is underlined; the numbering „1” is editorial, the card does not number its entries. The same inn and the same figure of 2 hearths stands in T90 on card 1) („karczma na Lipniaku - do dóbr Zastawie należy, dziedz. - dymów wiejskich - 2”) — two years of the register, 1790 and 1794, agree to the single hearth, which is an independent confirmation of the reading of the figure. Verification of 17 September 2026: the line examined under magnification, the buildings entered in the the breakdown of buildings field, because the card names them outright. The two hearths concern the whole inn; the the breakdown of buildings field says that there is one building. The the breakdown of buildings field serves to set the hearths out by buildings and must sum to them; here the card does not set the hearths out, so we record the building by a marker in the annotations.

The card gives no forename — only the surname in the genitive („Stoińskiego”), so the recorded form of the name remains empty (this is not a form derived from a husband's name, but simply the absence of a forename). THE SURNAME [READING UNCERTAIN]: the elements „-o-i-ń-skiego” are certain; the second letter is in dispute, written as a tall loop with a crossbar — I read it as a „t” (hence „Stoiński”), but by its shape it could just as well be an „ł” („Słoiński”). The leading letter „S” cannot be compared with any second capital „S” on this card. This surname is NOT in `nazwiska.json` — I report it as new and do not enter it myself.

Wólka Zastawskaparafia Tuchowicz

Stoiński†

1794Hearth tax register 1794

T948 hearthssuccessors† deceasedT94 – folwark Wolka Zastawska, przyległość wsi Zastawia sukcesorów Stoińskiego, 8 dymów;card 3)

The card gives no forename — the surname alone; O83 (IX) adds the office („podczaszego łukowskiego”), but I do not merge the years, and so I do not enter the office here. The card gives no total for the year — the two entries together give 10 hearths.

Zastawieparafia Tuchowicz

Stoiński†deputy cupbearer of Lublin (podczaszy lubelski)

1790Hearth tax register 1790

T9012 · share of 6successors† deceasedpossessorT90. – wieś Zastawie z przyległościami (t.zn. Zastawie, Wólka Zastawska i karczma na Lipniaku), dobra sukces. Stoińskiego podczaszego lubelskiego w poses. dożyw. Heleny Stoińskiej. – folwark Zastawie – dymów wiejskich 2giej klasy – 12;–

the same entry also names: Stoińska Helena2 persons on 12 hearths

The opening of the entry describes the whole estate (Zastawie + Wólka Zastawska + the inn at Lipniak), but the number of hearths refers plainly to the grange of Zastawie itself („folwark Zastawie – dymów wiejskich 2giej klasy – 12”), and so these 12 hearths do NOT take in Wólka: Wólka has in T90 an arithmetic of its own on card 1) (8 + 2 = 10 hearths). The figure 12 is underlined; the card gives no total for the year. The card gives no forename for Stoiński — the surname alone; „sukces.” makes him dead. Helena Stoińska holds the estate in possession for life — a woman, the surname in the feminine form („Heleny Stoińskiej”). DISCREPANCY: here Stoiński is „podczaszym lubelskim”, while O83 and T89 of the same card speak of a „podczaszynie łukowskiej” (O83, card 3) of Wólka Zastawska — of a „podczaszym łukowskim”); I record each year as it stands. The abbreviation „T.zn.” I expand as „to znaczy”, that is, only in the explanation; in the text I leave the form from the card.

Stoiński†deputy cupbearer of Lublin (podczaszy lubelski)

1794Hearth tax register 1794

T9412 hearthssuccessors† deceasedT94 – wieś Zastawie z przyległościami sukcesorów Stoińskiego, należą do tej wsi: folwark Zastawie, folwark Wolka Zastawska, karczma na Lipniaku; folwark Zastawie 12 dymów;card 2)

The figure 12 concerns the grange of Zastawie alone — the card lists three parts of the estate, but gives a hearth only beside the first. The grange of Wólka Zastawska has in T94 8 hearths of its own on card 3), and the Tuchowicz holding in Wólka a further 2; to the inn at Lipniak none of the cards of Zastawie assigns hearths. The card gives no total for the year. The card gives no forename for Stoiński, nor does it repeat the office — it stops at the surname and at the „sukcesorach”, and so I do not add here the office from T90 or from O83 (I do not merge the years). The name of Wólka card 2) writes without the stroke over the „o” („Wolka Zastawska”), unlike the T90 of card.

This surname in full edition of the hearth-tax registers — together with the search across all persons, the comparison of figures through the registers, the modern map and the Perthées engraving of 1786.