CzarneckiSzymon
1775Hearth tax register 1775
T751 hearthcz. Szymona Czarneckiego dym. 1card 1)
Home › Castle court records / Old sources › The hearth-tax registers 1775–1794 › Surnames › Czarnecki
Hearth Tax Registers of the Łuków Land 1775–1794
Czarnecki
separate records 2 · places 1 · registers 1775, 1790, 1794
Dear reader, remember that this is an AI study, that it may contain errors; treat it as indicative and verify it for yourself.
Separate entries for persons
2
Occurrences on the cards
3
Hearths in total
2,0
Localities
1
„Separate entries for persons” means: separate entries of a given name with a surname and a byname, not persons proved to have existed. The same man recorded in four registers is one entry, but two namesakes from the same village are sometimes impossible to tell apart, and over twenty years a parcel could pass to a son of the same name. The hearths given at a collective entry are an equal division among those named — a calculation, not a reading.
| Year | Source | Entries | Persons | Hearths |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1775 | Hearth tax register 1775 | 1 | 1 | 1,0 |
| 1790 | Hearth tax register 1790 | 1 | 1 | 0,5 |
| 1794 | Hearth tax register 1794 | 1 | 1 | 0,5 |
No entry from 1789. This is the absence of the surname in the cards transcribed so far, not proof that the family was not there then: in the card file the 1794 register covers fewer villages than the others, and the 1775 one sometimes counts a whole starosty in a single entry, without surnames.
Where the surname occurs
The localities in which the card file records this surname, with the number of entries and of the hearths falling to it in each village.
- JezioryŁukówrecords 3 · hearths 2,0
The card file also records the form Czarnecka entries: 2 localities: 1 We record a surname as it stands on the card, because the feminine form is sometimes the only sign that the person is a woman; the two entries therefore stay separate. Whether this is the same family is for the reader to decide, not for this list.
The card-index entries
All the extracts for this surname in the wording of the cards. One block is one occurrence: this person, in this register. In a collective entry the same text of the card stands beside every person named — because the card names them together, and they must not be separated.
Jezioryparafia Łuków
CzarneckiAdam
1790Hearth tax register 1790
T901 · share of 0.50pł. of.cz. Adama Czarneckiego po dożywociu [imię nieodczytane] Czarneckiej matki, - dym 1 (pł. of)card 2)
the same entry also names: Czarnecka2 persons on 1 hearth
the holding passed to Adam after the expiry of his mother's life tenure; I have not read the mother's forename — [reading uncertain]. The marker „(pł. of)” the card sets at the end of the entry, after the number of hearths.
CzarneckiAdam
1794Hearth tax register 1794
T941 · share of 0.50cz. Adama Czarneckiego pod dożywociem Cecylii Czarneckiej - 1 -"- ;-card 3)
the same entry also names: Czarnecka Cecylia2 persons on 1 hearth
This entry gives the forename of the woman whose forename it was not possible to read at T90, entry 2, on card 2) („po dożywociu [imię nieodczytane] Czarneckiej matki”): here „Cecylii Czarneckiej” stands clearly, and the same forename is repeated by T089 on card 4) („Cecylii Czarneckiej”). Two independent occurrences, the reading is certain. I do not change the record on card 2) — that is a matter for the owner of the work.
This surname in full edition of the hearth-tax registers — together with the search across all persons, the comparison of figures through the registers, the modern map and the Perthées engraving of 1786.