Skip to content
Let us seek what unites us, and avoid what divides us
The Jasiński Family of JasionkaThe Łuków Land·Zbuczyn parish
PL

Home › Castle court records / Old sources › The hearth-tax registers 1775–1794 › Surnames › Dyminicz

Hearth Tax Registers of the Łuków Land 1775–1794

Dyminicz

separate records 1 · places 1 · registers 1775–1794

Dear reader, remember that this is an AI study, that it may contain errors; treat it as indicative and verify it for yourself.

Separate entries for persons
1
Occurrences on the cards
1
Hearths in total
0,0
Localities
1

„Separate entries for persons” means: separate entries of a given name with a surname and a byname, not persons proved to have existed. The same man recorded in four registers is one entry, but two namesakes from the same village are sometimes impossible to tell apart, and over twenty years a parcel could pass to a son of the same name. The hearths given at a collective entry are an equal division among those named — a calculation, not a reading.

YearSourceEntriesPersonsHearths
1789List of possessors of holdings of 178911—

Where the surname occurs

The localities in which the card file records this surname, with the number of entries and of the hearths falling to it in each village.

establishments recorded with this surname propination (the right to sell drink) Mościbrody

The card-index entries

All the extracts for this surname in the wording of the cards. One block is one occurrence: this person, in this register. In a collective entry the same text of the card stands beside every person named — because the card names them together, and they must not be separated.

MościbrodyZbuczyn parish

DyminiczKazimierz
1789List of possessors of holdings of 1789
T₀89took the oathpossessorpropination (the right to sell drink)T₀89 wś Maszczybrody z wsią Białkami w pos. Kazimierza Lemnickiego za przys. Kazimierz Dyminicz temi dobrami zarządzający – propinacja;card 2)

the same entry also names: Lemnicki Kazimierz2 persons on a holding without hearths

A list of the possessors of 1789 — without hearths, the hearths figure empty in line with the rule for T₀89. PROPINATION is written out plainly, the last word of the line, read at six-times magnification — this is not an uncertain reading. The extract ties the village to its appurtenance directly: „wś Maszczybrody z wsią Białkami”, both in one possession. „za przys.” = under oath / swore the oath; the oath was taken not by the possessor but by the manager of the estate, hence beside him the the status: „zaprzysiągł” (just as on cards, 184, 263, 344, 363). THE MANAGER'S SURNAME [READING UNCERTAIN]: I read „Dyminicz”. The letters broken down: a capital letter with a loop and a broad belly = „D”; a second letter with a long descender below the line = „y”; then „m” (three legs), „i” with a dot, „n”, „i” with a dot, and at the end a curve plus the characteristic crossed stroke descending below the line, identical to the „z” in „Kazimierz” in the same line and to the „cz” in „Maszczybrody” on the same card — hence the ending „-cz”, not „-ez”. Alternatives I cannot rule out: „Dziminicz”, „Dyminiez”, „Dymnicz”. Above the first letters stands a small mark shaped like a little „u” or „c” — I cannot decide whether it is a compiler's mark (like the ǂ over „Markowskiego” in T94) or a letter inserted above the line; I do not carry it into the text. A surname of this shape occurs neither in the hearth-tax card index nor in SLOWNIK-OKOLICY — I do not force it onto the list and I report it to the owner of the card index as an item to be resolved. The possessor's surname is written here „Lemnickiego”, without the tail — the same as in T90 on card 1), and differently from O83 on the same card („Lęmnickiego”).

the surname [reading uncertain] — see the entry's the note

This surname in full edition of the hearth-tax registers — together with the search across all persons, the comparison of figures through the registers, the modern map and the Perthées engraving of 1786.