Łabuski

separate records 1 · places 1 · registers 1790

Dear reader, remember that this is an AI study, that it may contain errors; treat it as indicative and verify it for yourself.

Separate entries for persons

Occurrences on the cards

Hearths in total

0,0

Localities

„Separate entries for persons” means: separate entries of a given name with a surname and a byname, not persons proved to have existed. The same man recorded in four registers is one entry, but two namesakes from the same village are sometimes impossible to tell apart, and over twenty years a parcel could pass to a son of the same name. The hearths given at a collective entry are an equal division among those named — a calculation, not a reading.

Year	Source	Entries	Persons	Hearths
1790	Hearth tax register 1790	1	1	—

No entry from 1775, 1789 and 1794. This is the absence of the surname in the cards transcribed so far, not proof that the family was not there then: in the card file the 1794 register covers fewer villages than the others, and the 1775 one sometimes counts a whole starosty in a single entry, without surnames.

Where the surname occurs

The localities in which the card file records this surname, with the number of entries and of the hearths falling to it in each village.

JeleniecTuchowiczrecords 1

establishments recorded with this surname brewery Jeleniec inn Jeleniec

The card-index entries

All the extracts for this surname in the wording of the cards. One block is one occurrence: this person, in this register. In a collective entry the same text of the card stands beside every person named — because the card names them together, and they must not be separated.

Jeleniecparafia Tuchowicz

ŁabuskiWincenty

1790Hearth tax register 1790

T90innbreweryKarczma z Browarem w Uroczysku przy tamie Jelenia do folwarku Wincentego Łabuskiego.card 1)

The surname [reading uncertain]: certain are the opening „Ła-” (a small capital with a crossbar) and the ending „-uskiego”; the third letter is a tall loop closed with a bowl, that is, in this hand, a „b” (cf. „brow.” on card 2), and not a „d” (cf. „dwór”, „do” — there the „d” has first the bowl, then the ascender without a loop). Hence „Łabuski”; I do not rule out „Ładuski”. „przy tamie Jelenia” [reading uncertain] — on the card „pry_amie” is legible, which I expand as „przy tamie”, by the dam; O83 records a mill at Jeleniec, and so a dam makes good sense. The entry gives no number of hearths: it is a note on an object lying in Uroczysko (the card cross-refers „zob. Uroczysko”, „Patrz Stanin”), and not a hearth-bearing holding of Jeleniec — and so the hearths figure is null and it does not enter the total of 28. Verification of 17 IX 2026: the line examined under magnification, the buildings entered in the the breakdown of buildings field, because the card names them outright. At this line the card gives no hearths, so the hearths figure remains empty; the 28 hearths of the second T90 extract belong to the grange of Jeleniec, not to the inn. The the breakdown of buildings field serves to break the hearths down into buildings and must sum to them; here the card gives no breakdown of the hearths, so the building is recorded with a marker in the annotations.

This surname in full edition of the hearth-tax registers — together with the search across all persons, the comparison of figures through the registers, the modern map and the Perthées engraving of 1786.