Skip to content
Let us seek what unites us, and avoid what divides us

HomeCastle court records / Old sourcesThe Łuków castle court records 1743–1744SurnamesStypiński

The Łuków castle court records 1743–1744

Stypiński

persons 1 · entries 1 · years 1743

Dear reader, remember that this is an AI study, that it may contain errors; treat it as indicative and verify it for yourself.

Persons (different given names)
1
Entries in the records
1
Occurrences in the acts
1
Years
1743

„Persons (different given names)” means: different combinations of a given name with a byname, not persons proved to have existed. Two namesakes from one family merge here into a single item, and the acts give nothing to tell them apart. An entry naming several families stands beside each of them — because the record names them together, and they must not be separated.

Persons

The persons of this surname in the acts, with the number of entries and with the kinships the record states outright.

StypińskiAntoniGen.1

spouse Marianna Burska

entries 227

Entries

Every entry in which the acts name this surname. With each one: the chancery date in translation, the folio of the register, the kind of act, an outline of the case, and the persons and localities named in the entry.

1743chancery year

18 March 1743entry 227card 38rscan 56/041

kind of case Cession of a sum (cessio summae) cessio summae

Cession of a sum of 500 złp together with a penalty of 14 marks

active party Józef Klembowski Nob. · Party

passive party Marianna Burska Gen. · Acquirer

value 500

persons in the entry Józef Klembowski, son of the late Maciej – the cedent; Antoni and Marianna née Burska Stypiński, husband and wife – the cessionaries

localities in the entry the Łuków castle court office

The noble (Nob.) Józef Klembowski, son of the late noble (Nob.) Maciej, being of sound mind and body, deposed that to the well-born (Gen.) Antoni and Marianna née Burska Stypiński, spouses of one another, and to their successors he cedes the sum of five hundred Polish złoty – awarded to the deponent in the first place by a decree of compromise (of the arbitration court), and afterwards adjudged and enjoined to be paid, together with the luitum (lucta) penalty of fourteen Polish marks, by a decree given in the terms for complaints (the courts of suits) of the present office on the Monday after the feast of the Assumption of the Most Glorious Virgin Mary in the Year of Our Lord one thousand seven hundred and forty-two, between the deponent and the present cessionaries – and this because the present cessionaries have in fact paid out that sum together with the penalty, after the deduction of two Hungarian red złoty, to him, the deponent, according to the tenor of the decree cited. The cession takes in all the conditions both of the original inscription as to that sum and of the decrees; he gives and grants the power to pursue that sum together with the penalty, to receive it and to give a quittance for the receipt. Moreover that same deponent undertakes and binds himself to defend and to warrant those same cessionaries against all hindrances in the keeping of that sum, in every court and office, upon all his estates, together with his successors.

notes and marginalia A note: the deponent cannot write.

date as the chancery wrote it (under the same date)

This surname in full edition of the castle court records — together with the search across all entries, the family cards with their trees, the prosopography and the study of the source.