Skip to content
Let us seek what unites us, and avoid what divides us

HomeCastle court records / Old sourcesThe Łuków castle court records 1743–1744SurnamesSienicki

The Łuków castle court records 1743–1744

Sienicki

persons 7 · entries 3 · years 1743–1744

Dear reader, remember that this is an AI study, that it may contain errors; treat it as indicative and verify it for yourself.

Persons (different given names)
7
Entries in the records
3
Occurrences in the acts
7
Years
1743–1744

„Persons (different given names)” means: different combinations of a given name with a byname, not persons proved to have existed. Two namesakes from one family merge here into a single item, and the acts give nothing to tell them apart. An entry naming several families stands beside each of them — because the record names them together, and they must not be separated.

forms of the name in the acts Sienicka Sienicki

bynames used with this surname Kolumna

Persons

The persons of this surname in the acts, with the number of entries and with the kinships the record states outright.

SienickiAleksander«Kolumna»Adm. Rev.1

father Piotr Sienicki

entries 160

SienickaDominellaMagn.1

father Andrzej Rudzieński

mother Salomea Opacka

spouse Stanisław Sienicki

entries 1179

SienickiFranciszek«Kolumna»Magn.1

father Piotr Sienicki

entries 160

SienickiPiotrMagn.1

entries 160

SienickiSebastian«Kolumna»Magn.1

father Piotr Sienicki

entries 160

SienickiStanisławMagn.1

spouse Dominella Sienicka

entries 1179

SienickaZofiaGen.1

spouse Andrzej Chrościechowski

entries 819

Localities and estates

The localities beside which the acts name this surname, with the number of entries.

Family trees

Fragments of families assembled from the kinships the acts state outright. One fragment is as much as a single entry, or a group of entries, allows to be joined without guessing — not a whole family tree, only a certain piece of one.

The Sienicki family

The Sienicki family — descendants of Piotr Sienicki

confidence A — a single act

The whole structure comes from a single act (entry 160). Type of act: Quittance for mortgages redeemed.

Aleksander Sienicki known as Kolumna entry 160 Franciszek Sienicki known as Kolumna entry 160 Sebastian Sienicki known as Kolumna entry 160 Piotr Sienicki entry 160

160 · call no. 56/030, f. 26v, 2 March 1743

Entries

Every entry in which the acts name this surname. With each one: the chancery date in translation, the folio of the register, the kind of act, an outline of the case, and the persons and localities named in the entry.

1743chancery year

2 March 1743entry 160card 26vscan 56/030

kind of case Mortgage of estates (inscriptio obligatoria) inscriptio obligatoria (oppignoratio bonorum)

Quittance for pledges returned (a gilt object and a ring) and for a sum of 600 złp; extinction of mutual claims

active party Franciszek Sienicki Magn. · sword-bearer · Creditor (giving the quittance)

passive party Stanisław Rzewuski Magn. · pantler · Debtor

value 600

persons in the entry Franciszek Kolumna Sienicki, sword-bearer of the Bielsk land, comrade of His Royal Majesty's hussar banner, in his own name and in the name of his brothers german: Fr. Aleksander, canon of Brześć, and Sebastian, sword-bearer of Mielnik, Sienicki – the party giving the quittance; Stanisław Beydo Rzewuski, pantler of the Łuków land – the party quitted; the late Piotr Sienicki, pantler of Sanok – the deponent's father; the late Jan Rzewuski, hunter of Podlasie – the father of the party quitted

localities in the entry

The magnificent (Magn.) Franciszek Sienicki, sword-bearer of the Bielsk land, comrade of His Royal Majesty's hussar banner, in his own name and in the name of the very reverend (Adm. Rev.) Father Aleksander, canon of Brześć, and Sebastian, sword-bearer of Mielnik, Sienicki, his brothers german, for whose ratification he stands surety, being of sound mind and body, deposed that he gives a quittance to the magnificent (Magn.) Stanisław Beydo Rzewuski, pantler of the Łuków land, and to his successors for the pledges returned to him – a gilt object and a ring [uncertain reading] – pledged by the late magnificent (Magn.) Piotr Sienicki, pantler of Sanok, the deponent's father, with the late magnificent (Magn.) Jan Rzewuski, hunter of Podlasie, the father of the party now quitted, for the sum of one thousand Polish złoty; and likewise for the sum of six hundred Polish złoty – in completion of the sum of four hundred Polish złoty for a horse, secured for payment by a hand-written bond given by the party now quitted to the said late magnificent (Magn.) Piotr Sienicki, pantler of Sanok, and hitherto unpaid, and now set off and reckoned by the deponent. For that sum of six hundred Polish złoty he gives a quittance; they reserve to themselves no mutual claims on account of those pledges or of the sum of one thousand Polish złoty – on the contrary, they cancel them.

notes and marginalia Signature beneath the entry: „ręką własną i braci – Franciszek Kolumna Sienicki”.

date as the chancery wrote it (under the date of the Saturday after Ash Wednesday 1743)

31 July 1743entry 819card 128vscan 56/132

kind of case Inscription of a sum and dower settlement (inscriptio, dotalitium) inscriptio simplicis debiti; dotalitium et reformatio

Inscription (inscriptio) of 1152 złp with interest of 10%, payable by 23 June 1744

active party Andrzej Chrościechowski Gen. · Debtor

passive party Stanisław Rzewuski Magn. · pantler · Creditor

value 1152

persons in the entry Andrzej Chrościechowski and Zofia née Sienicka, his wife – the parties making the inscription; Stanisław Beydo Rzewuski, pantler of the Łuków land, lieutenant colonel of the Crown armies – creditor

The well-born (Gen.) Andrzej and Zofia née Sienicka Chrościechowski, spouses – and the wife with the assistance of that same husband of hers – being of sound mind and body, deposed that to the magnificent (Magn.) Stanisław Beydo Rzewuski, pantler of the Łuków land, lieutenant colonel of the armies of His Royal Majesty and of the Commonwealth, and to his lawful successors they are bound and obliged for the sum of one thousand one hundred and fifty-two Polish złoty by way of a certain, true, just, liquid and simple debt; which sum they inscribe and secure upon all and each of their estates and upon any sums whatsoever, those of interest as well, and likewise upon their movables and livestock; and they undertake and bind themselves to pay that sum to their magnificent (Magn.) creditor on the vigil of the feast of the Nativity of St John the Baptist falling in the coming year 1744, God willing, together with the interest at ten per hundred – for which interest for the present year, being paid, the deponents themselves give a quittance – and to lodge it with the Łuków castle court records, and this under a penalty of one thousand one hundred and fifty-two Polish złoty and under the present court.

[Autograph signatures:] A. Chrościechowski; Z. Chrościechowska

notes and marginalia The wife's maiden name („de Sienickie”) agrees with the PTG tag for scan 132 („Zofia Sienicka Chrościewicka”). The rate of interest 10% – the same as in the inscription of Ostroróg (no. 816).

date as the chancery wrote it Feria Quarta pridie Festi Sancti Petri in Vinculis Anno Domini 1743

1744chancery year

24 February 1744entry 1179folio 20v–21rscan 57/022

kind of case Compromise and arbitration court (compromissum) compromissum; electio superarbitri

Inscription of submission to an arbitration court (compromissum) in a suit over a dowry, with the appointment of an umpire (superarbiter)

active party Adam Rudzieński Magn. · deputy cup-bearer · Party

passive party Dominella Sienicka Magn. · standard-bearer of Latyczów · Party

persons in the entry Adam a Mińsko Rudzieński, deputy cup-bearer of the Stężyca land, and his brother [the given name read with uncertainty] Rudzieński – sons of the late Andrzej Rudzieński, pantler of Bracław – the first party; Stanisław Sienicki, standard-bearer of Latyczów, acting also in the name of his wife – the second party; Dominella née Rudzieńska Sienicka, his wife, daughter of the late Andrzej Rudzieński – over whose dowry the suit is carried on; Andrzej Rudzieński, pantler of Bracław – the late father; Salomea Opacka – the late mother; Wiktor Aleksander of Cieszków Cieszkowski, land clerk and clerk of the castle court of Liw – the chosen umpire

localities in the entry the estate of Rowy Principaliora (the ground of the arbitration journey); the Crown Tribunal at Lublin

The magnificent (Magn.) Adam a Mińsko Rudzieński, deputy cup-bearer of the Stężyca land, and the other brother, [the given name read with uncertainty] Rudzieński, sons of the late magnificent (Magn.) Andrzej Rudzieński, pantler of Bracław, on the one side, and Stanisław Sienicki, standard-bearer of Latyczów, in his own name and in the name of the magnificent (Magn.) Dominella née Rudzieńska – by her first marriage the wife of the magnificent (Magn.) Prusiński, deputy pantler of Latyczów, by her second the wife of the magnificent (Magn.) Leszyński [uncertain reading], pantler of Czernihów, and now his own wife, and daughter of the above-named magnificent (Magn.) Andrzej Rudzieński, pantler of Bracław – for whose ratification he stands surety, on the other side, being of sound mind and body, deposed and acknowledged that they, wishing to allay and finally to determine the suit and action over the dowry falling to that same magnificent (Magn.) Dominella née Rudzieńska, now Sienicka, out of the paternal and maternal estates, brought and lodged with the Lublin Tribunal courts, do inscribe and have besought as highest judge and umpire (superarbiter) the magnificent (Magn.) Wiktor Aleksander of Cieszków Cieszkowski, land clerk and clerk of the castle court of Liw.

Which magnificent (Magn.) umpire, together with the arbiters chosen two from each side, is to journey to the ground of the estate of Rowy Principaliora on the Monday after Cantate Sunday, falling in the present year 1744. First of all he shall enjoin upon both appearing parties the production of the documents of the mass of the substance, both the paternal – left by the late magnificent (Magn.) Andrzej Rudzieński, pantler of Bracław – and the maternal, devolved from the late magnificent (Magn.) Salomea Opacka, to whomsoever it may have fallen; and as to the honest production of them he shall bind them by an oath. Out of what is produced he shall come to know and shall establish the mass of both substances, both movable and immovable, devolved from both parents. Having established the mass of the substance, he shall assign and adjudge to the magnificent (Magn.) Dominella née Rudzieńska Sienicka a dowry proportionate according to the mind of the law of nature; and the suit itself over the dowry he shall determine according to the terms issued to the Tribunal courts of the Kingdom, keeping their tenor. The rights and the condition of the estates, both the present and the former, together with the inquisitions, should there be need to carry them out, he shall come to know and shall decide; and all and each of the mutual claims, as the need of the case shall require, without going beyond the tenor of the terms issued, he shall determine, moderate and set aside. To his decision both parties – both those inscribing themselves and those chosen – undertake and inscribe themselves to submit entirely and to be obedient to the award, and this under the land-law damages and under the court of the Lublin Tribunal of the Kingdom.

[Autograph signatures:] Adam Rudzieński, deputy cup-bearer of the Stężyca land — Stanisław Sienicki

notes and marginalia The most elaborate entry of the year 1744 in point of procedure: a full *compromissum* with a description of the course of the arbitration proceedings (the journey to the ground, the production of the documents under oath, the establishing of the mass of the inheritance, the assignment of a proportionate dowry, the limits of adjudication set by the tenor of the Tribunal terms). As umpire there was chosen Wiktor Aleksander Cieszkowski, land clerk and clerk of the castle court of Liw – the same person who appears in entry 1162 as the second husband of Hilaria née Laskowska. The term of the journey has been reckoned: the Monday after Cantate Sunday 1744 = 4 May 1744. The given name of the second of the Rudzieński brothers has been read with uncertainty („Ign…”), and for that reason it has not been entered in the personal records; it is not in the PTG tags for scan 57-022. Neither Prusiński nor Leszyński (the two former husbands of Dominella) is there – the discrepancy has been noted. The PTG tag gives the given name „Dominella”; the manuscript writes „Domicella” – the reading of the tag has been adopted and the form of the manuscript noted.

date as the chancery wrote it (under the same date)

This surname in full edition of the castle court records — together with the search across all entries, the family cards with their trees, the prosopography and the study of the source.