father Piotr Cielemęcki
entries 630 833 1664

Home › Castle court records / Old sources › The Łuków castle court records 1743–1744 › Surnames › Cielemęcki
The Łuków castle court records 1743–1744
persons 8 · entries 3 · years 1743–1744
Dear reader, remember that this is an AI study, that it may contain errors; treat it as indicative and verify it for yourself.
„Persons (different given names)” means: different combinations of a given name with a byname, not persons proved to have existed. Two namesakes from one family merge here into a single item, and the acts give nothing to tell them apart. An entry naming several families stands beside each of them — because the record names them together, and they must not be separated.
The persons of this surname in the acts, with the number of entries and with the kinships the record states outright.
father Piotr Cielemęcki
entries 630 833 1664
father Piotr Cielemęcki
entries 630 833 1664
father Piotr Antoni Cielemęcki, Piotr Cielemęcki
mother Joanna Jezierska
This item certainly merges several persons: under this given name the acts name 2 different parents of the same degree, and one person has one father and one mother. The card file gives nothing to tell them apart — for that one must go to the entries below.
entries 833 1664
father Piotr Cielemęcki
entries 630 833
spouse Joanna Jezierska
entries 630 833
father Piotr Cielemęcki
entries 630
father Piotr Antoni Cielemęcki
mother Joanna Jezierska
entries 1664
spouse Joanna Jezierska
entries 1664
The localities beside which the acts name this surname, with the number of entries.
Fragments of families assembled from the kinships the acts state outright. One fragment is as much as a single entry, or a group of entries, allows to be joined without guessing — not a whole family tree, only a certain piece of one.
confidence B — 2 acts
A line assembled from 2 acts, linked by persons whose filiation is recorded. Predominant acts: Compromise.
630 · call no. 56/100, f. 97r, 18 June 1743 833 · call no. 56/134, f. 130v–131r, 3 August 1743
confidence A — a single act
The whole structure comes from a single act (entry 1664). Type of act: Quittance for a sum of principal and of interest.
Every entry in which the acts name this surname. With each one: the chancery date in translation, the folio of the register, the kind of act, an outline of the case, and the persons and localities named in the entry.
kind of case Compromise and arbitration court (compromissum) compromissum; electio superarbitri
Compromise (a submission to an arbitration court) – the choice of an umpire and of arbiters in the dispute over the inheritance share of the Cielemęckis
active party Hiacynt Cielemęcki Adm. Rev. · archdeacon · Party
passive party Adam Łaski Gen. · deputy voivode of Łuków · Party
persons in the entry Father Hiacynt (Jacek) Cielemęcki, archdeacon [the reading of the office uncertain], and Krzysztof, Adam and Józef Cielemęcki, sons of the late Piotr Cielemęcki, chamberlain of the Mielnik land, brothers german – the first and the second party; Adam Łaski, deputy voivode of Łuków – the third party; Krzysztof a Gołąbki Jezierski – umpire; Joanna née Jezierska, 1° voto wife of the late Piotr Cielemęcki, 2° voto wife of Adam Łaski
localities in the entry Łuków – the convent of the Friars Minor of St Francis Observant (the place appointed for the condescension)
[Heading:] The ninth protocol of inscriptions, under the act of the Tuesday within the octave of the feast of the Most Holy Body of Christ Our Lord, of that same year 1743 [18 June 1743].
The venerable (Ven.) Hiacynt [Cielemęcki], archdeacon […], on the one side, and Krzysztof on the other […] the Cielemęckis, and likewise Adam and Józef, sons of the late magnificent (Magn.) Piotr Cielemęcki, chamberlain of the Mielnik land, brothers german to one another, as also the well-born (Gen.) Adam Łaski, deputy voivode of Łuków, as the third party, being of sound mind and body, deposed that – for the final settling and deciding of the classes of claims, both between themselves the brothers and […] held and arising up to this day –
as the highest arbiter and judge (the umpire) they choose, inscribe, appoint and solemnly […] the magnificent (Magn.) Krzysztof a Gołąbki Jezierski, giving and granting to that same magnificent (Magn.) umpire […] the right to hold a condescension and to establish the jurisdiction.
That same magnificent (Magn.) umpire is to come down to the condescension at the convent of the fathers of the Order of St Francis Observant here at Łuków on the Wednesday after the feast of the Nativity of St John the Baptist [26 June 1743], together with the magnificent (Magn.) arbiters, two appointed by each side.
First of all he shall bind the well-born (Gen.) Adam Łaski, deputy voivode of Łuków, and the magnificent (Magn.) Joanna née Jezierska – by her first marriage the wife of the late magnificent (Magn.) Piotr Cielemęcki, chamberlain of the Mielnik land, and by her second marriage the wife of that same [Łaski] – her husband, to produce the documents, throwing light upon the mass of the Cielemęcki substance; upon that production, preceded above all by an oath taken and confirmed, he shall establish that mass and shall separate from the Cielemęcki substance what passed to the successors by title of the late Joanna née Jezierska Łaska;
next he shall examine the lawfulness of the succession – both after the late […] and after Piotr Cielemęcki, the father, and after the nobles (Nob.) Franciszek and Józef Cielemęcki, brothers german, who died without issue, and after Antoni […]; regulating the rights and actions of the parties, he shall decide all the transactions, shall ascertain to whom what fell, and shall cancel or confirm the claims of the parties – according to equity; from whatever source they arise, he shall judge them according to the degrees of law that shall be required;
finally, in his decision, according to the classes described above, he shall order the setting apart […] of sums of that kind in due proportion both to the parties and to the competing claimants, in […] the making of satisfaction.
As regards the noble (Nob.) deputy voivode of Łuków – on account of the sum of six thousand Polish złoty contracted by the late […] in favour of […] Hiacynt, he shall decide and shall compel to warranty whomsoever it shall fall to, or shall secure him upon the sums concerning him, so far as they suffice; and should the warranty upon the sums named above and upon others prove insufficient – he shall reserve to himself the indication [of further security].
Promising and inscribing themselves that whatever shall be decided and adjudged by the said magnificent (Magn.) umpire together with the magnificent (Magn.) arbiters, they shall hold as valid and agreeable; and this under the land-law damages and under the jurisdiction of the present office.
[Signatures:] A. Łaski, deputy voivode of Łuków; Jacek Cielemęcki in his own hand; Fr. Krzysztof Cielemęcki in his own hand
notes and marginalia The entry opens the NINTH protocol of inscriptions of the register (f. 97r), under the date 18 June 1743. It is an extensive compromise (a submission to an arbitration court) in the inheritance dispute of the Cielemęcki family, with Krzysztof a Gołąbki Jezierski as umpire; the condescension appointed for 26 June 1743 at the Bernardine convent of Łuków (the date verified: St John the Baptist 24 June 1743 – a Monday, the Wednesday after it – 26 June). The text is in places much abbreviated and effaced; the illegible passages have been marked with brackets. The office of Father Hiacynt („Archidiaconus”) and part of the given names of the successors are uncertain readings. All the persons agree with the tags for scan 100.
date as the chancery wrote it Protocollon Inscriptionum Nonum sub Actu Feria [Tertia] intra Octavas Festi Sanctissimi Corporis Christi Domini Anno ejusdem 1743
kind of case Compromise and arbitration court (compromissum) compromissum; electio superarbitri
Compromise (an inscription submitting to an arbitration court) – the choice of an umpire and a programme for separating the masses of property
active party Krzysztof Cielemęcki Adm. Rev. · land chamberlain · Party
passive party Adam Łaski Magn. · deputy voivode · Party
persons in the entry Father Krzysztof Cielemęcki, son of the late Piotr Cielemęcki, land chamberlain of Bielsk, acting also in the name of his brother Father Hiacynt Cielemęcki, archdeacon of Bakowo [uncertain reading] – the first party; Adam Łaski, deputy voivode of the Łuków land – the second party; Krzysztof z Gołąbek Jezierski, starosta [the reading of the office uncertain] – umpire (superarbiter); Jan Jezierski; the late Franciszek and Józef Cielemęcki
localities in the entry Łazy
The very reverend (Adm. Rev.) Father Krzysztof Cielemęcki, son of the late venerable (Ven.) Piotr Cielemęcki, land chamberlain of Bielsk – in his own name and in the name of the very reverend (Perillustr. et Adm. Rev.) Father Hiacynt Cielemęcki, archdeacon of Bakowo [uncertain reading], his brother german, by virtue of a special power of attorney deposed for him by that brother, for the acts described below, before the present records on the Wednesday, on the vigil of the feast of St Peter in Chains of the present year 1743 – on the one side, and the magnificent (Magn.) Adam Łaski, deputy voivode of the Łuków land, on the other side, being of sound mind and body, deposed that they – for the final quieting and settlement of the classes of claims arising mutually between them – choose as their highest judge and umpire (superarbiter) the magnificent (Magn.) Krzysztof z Gołąbek Jezierski, starosta [the reading of the office uncertain], and inscribe this, giving and permitting to that same magnificent (Magn.) umpire to come down to the ground at the term described below and to found his jurisdiction.
Which magnificent (Magn.) umpire, having come down to the ground of the estate of Łazy, the leasehold of the magnificent (Magn.) Łaski, deputy voivode of Łuków, on the Monday after the feast of St Lawrence the Martyr coming in the present year, together with the magnificent (Magn.) arbiters – two taken by each side – shall first of all compel the said Adam Łaski, deputy voivode of Łuków, and the magnificent (Magn.) Jan z Jezierskich [uncertain reading], as the husband of the [granddaughter] of the late venerable (Ven.) Piotr Cielemęcki, chamberlain of the Bielsk land, to bring in both the documents and the whole mass of the Cielemęcki substance; and out of that bringing in, which is to take place first of all and is to be affirmed by oath, he shall establish that same mass and separate it from the Jezierski substance, fallen to the successors by title of the late lord z Jezierskich Łaski; next he shall settle the lawfulness of the succession – both after the late venerable (Ven.) Piotr Cielemęcki, the father, and after the late lords Franciszek and Józef Cielemęcki, brothers german, who died without issue – and shall declare upon whom it has fallen; further he shall examine any claims whatsoever of the parties, arising from whatsoever source, whose adjudication they shall demand; and lastly, after the settlement of the above classes, he shall carry out a division of the estates, proportionate to the sums charged upon them, between the parties and the participants, as also the restitution of the movables and the livestock.
Moreover he shall join to this the claim of the lord deputy voivode of Łuków on account of the sum of six thousand Polish złoty contracted by the lord Cielemęcki for the very reverend (Adm. Rev.) Father Hiacynt Cielemęcki, shall settle it and compel to warranty whomsoever it shall concern, or shall secure it upon the sums concerning him, so far as they suffice; and in the event of an insufficient warranty he shall reserve the vindication upon the sums enumerated above and upon others.
Promising and inscribing that they will accept as valid and pleasing all that shall be settled and adjudged by the magnificent (Magn.) umpire together with the magnificent (Magn.) arbiters, and this under the land-law damages and under the present court.
[Autograph signatures:] Adam Łaski; Fr Krzysztof Cielemęcki, also in the name of [his brother]
notes and marginalia For scan 134 and the following the Skanoteka has no tags any more – the reading rests on the manuscript alone, hence the greater number of reservations. The date of the session verified: 3 August 1743 did indeed fall on a Saturday; the term for the meeting of the arbiters (the Monday after St Lawrence) is 12 August 1743. The entry is a classic compromise (compromissum) with a full programme of the umpire's acts: the bringing in of the documents, the oath, the separation of the Cielemęcki and the Jezierski masses of property, the settlement of the succession, the division of the estates and the restitution of the movables. The office of Krzysztof z Gołąbek Jezierski and the dignity of the archdeacon have been read with hesitation.
date as the chancery wrote it Sabbatho post Festum Sancti Petri in Vinculis proximo Anno Domini 1743
This entry is awaiting an English translation; below stands the Polish translation from the Latin.
kind of case Compromise and arbitration court (compromissum) compromissum; electio superarbitri
active party Jan Antoni Cielemęcki Gen. · burgrave · Creditor (giving the quittance)
passive party Adam Łaski Magn. · deputy voivode · Debtor
value 228
This surname in full edition of the castle court records — together with the search across all entries, the family cards with their trees, the prosopography and the study of the source.